ML20072H178

Rev A,To Program Plan for Independent Review of Zimmer Project Mgt. W/One Oversize Figure.Aperture Card Is Available in PDR

ML20072H178
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	05/31/1983
From:	TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY
To:
References
GA-C17044, NUDOCS 8306290356
Download: ML20072H178 (49)

Text

. ,

l Toch) t % S D '> f I GA-C17044 l Revision A I

PROGRAM PLAN g

--, s.

I INDEPENDENT REVIEW 0F l ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT

'I i

h PREPARED FOR CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY I

I I

I XA Copy Has_Been Sen_i_folDJ ll MAY 1983 l TORREY j PINES TECHNOLOGY l A D vision of GA Technologies Inc. -

'I eode035p x*) 2eoM(t

. . _ , . _ _ _ _ , - _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _a - ume.-A_1.- . ._. _ o- ---- . --- ._

I I

GA-C17044 I Revision A I

g PROGRAM PLAN I INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF l ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT I l 1

PREPARED FOR

g CINCINNATI GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY l

1 I 1 I

I I

MAY 1983 g

I l I ~

I

- s I

I TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE I

SUMMARY

................................................... 1  !

II TASK DESCRIPTIONS ......................................... 4 Task A TPT Program Management and Integration .......... 5 Task B Evaluation of CG&E Project Management I Organization .................................... 8 Task C Evaluation of CG&E Management Policies Toward Quality Assurance .............................. 11 Task D Evaluation of CG&E's Management of the Quality I Assurance Program ............................... 14 Task E Evaluation of CG&E Quality Confirmation Program ........................................ 18 Task F Evaluation of CG&E's Project Management Interfaces with Major Subcontractors ...................... 22 Task G Evaluation of Planned Transition from Plant Cons truction to Operations Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Task H Evaluation of CG&E's Management of Zimmer through I the Case S tudy Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Task J Evaluation of Alterr. ate Project Management Organizations .................................. 31 Task K Reports and Recommendations .................... 34 I i

I 1 I I.

SUMMARY

I This Program Plan has been developed for the independent review of Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company's (CG&E) management of the W. H. Zimmer, Unit 1, Nuclear Power Station (NPS) Project in the areas of organization, management, quality assurance, quality confirmation, and interface control.

This program will be performed by Torrey Pines Technology (TPT), a division of GA Technologies, Inc. (GA), for Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company.

The program is divided into ten tasks as follows:

Task A TPT Program Management and Integration Task B Evaluation of CG&E Project Management Organization Task C Evaluation of CG&E Management Policies Toward Quality Assurance Task D Evaluation of CG&E Management of the Quality Assurance Program Task E Evaluation of CG&E Quality Confirmation Program Task F Evaluation of CG&E Project Management Interfaces I

with Major Subcontractors Task G Evaluation of Planned Transition from Plant l

l Construction to Operations Phase Task H Evaluation of CG&E's Project Management of Zimmer through the Case Study Approach Task J Evaluation of Alternate Project Management Organizations Task K Reports and Recommendations i The program is structured to determine what organizational changes a must be effected to ensure that construction of the Zimmer 1 NPS can be completed in conformance with NRC regulations and the construction permit.

Individuals assigned to this program will file statements of indepen-eence, under oath or affirmation, attesting to their freedom from conflict 1

I I of interest on the Zimmer Project with CG&E, Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Company, Dayton Power & Light, Sargent & Lundy, Kaiser Engineers, I General Electric Company and Bechtel.

This program will be performed under a documented QA program prepared specifically for this project utilizing the NRC-approved GA Quality Assurance Program.

All communications with CG&E will conform to the " Protocol Governing Communications Between CG&E and Independent Organizations Conducting Reviews or Audits under the Commission's Order," as transmitted by letter I dated 3/2/83 from NRC to CG&E.

This independent review is scheduled to be completed in July, 1983 The overall schedule is sliown in Figure 1.

I I

I l

I I

I lI 2

lI t

.=

DOCUV1ENT .

~

PAG _: .

l PU _ LED l

j i

l ANO. t

-se NO. OF PAGES #

REASON O PAGE ELEGS2 l D wAno core raso AT. pon er OTHER

/ I D BETTER COP ( REQUESTEo DN 00"**E 10 FEM.

a e <o - , 1, ,,,

OTHER RFEMED DN APERTURE CARD NO C l

L - - . - .

I I II. TASK DESCRIPTION I

The purpose of this program is to conduct an independent review of Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company's management of the W. H. Zimmer Unit 1 Nuclear Power Station (NPS) project including its quality assurance program and its quality confirmation program to determine organizational changes needed to encure that construction of the Zimmer 1 plant can be completed in conformance with NRC regulations and the construction permit.

The program will review the organizational structure, policies and procedures and QA activities of CG&E, including its interfaces with Sargent

& Lundy, H. J. Kaiser Engineers and General Electric Company. The evalua-tion will examine four periods of time encompassing the Zimmer Project viz (a) project inception to che assumption of increased construction responsi-bilities by CG&E circa 1976, (b) from 1976 to the Immediate Action Letter (IAL) in early 1981, (c) from the IAL to the Stop Work Order (SWO) in November 1982, and (d) since the SWO.

The basic approach used in the review will be to separately examine I key characteristics and aspects of the Zimmer project management and QA programs. As a cross-check selected " case studies" will be examined to assess managements collective role and behavior in response to specific problems and/or series of events.

l Alternative organizational structures including procedural and organi-zational changes that have been implemented and/or proposed by CG&E since the stop work order will be evaluated and appropriate ways of strengthening the Zimmer project management will be recommended.

I Technical review, construction inspection and evaluation are not

, included in the program.

l Detailed descriptions of the tasks included in this program are pro-vided in the following subsections.

,I

E I TASK A - TPT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND INTEGRATION Objective To manage and direct all activities related to TPT's independent review of the W. H. Zimmer, Unit No.1, NPS Project Management.

I Subtasks I A1. Prepare a program plan identifying the planned work and schedule. The plan and appropriateness of approach will be reassessed following the review by the survey team ( AS below) and a final program plan pre-pared.

I A2. Prepare a Quality Assurance Program Document (QAPD) specifically for this TPT project, utilizing the NRC-approved GA Quality Assurance Program. This document will define internal audits to assess com-I pliance with the independent verification of project requirements.

A3 Hold introductory meetings with CC'Z management. Set up programmatic interfaces and communication / correspondence procedures.

A4. Obtain information and documentation related to W. H. Zimmer Unit l No. 1 project management and related major subcontractor interfaces (e.g., organization charts, policies, procedures and practices, QA manuals, status reports, histories and related documents).

l AS. Assemble survey team comprising key TPT personnel for meetings with i CG&E and Zimmer 1 project management staff. Interview key CG&E, subcontractor and other personnel as required to obtain additional information and/or explanation of the documentation received in A4.

l A6. Arrange follow-up detailed meetings and interviews, and obtain addi-l tional cross-check documents /information as appropriate based on the assessment of the initial survey team. Include interviews with repre-t l aentatives of related organizations, such as NRC, Advisory i

l l

l 5

I I Groups, Intervenor Groups, Insurance Companies, State Inspectors, etc.

to obtain a comprehensive assessment and information data base on the existing Zimmer project management organization. The interviews will include past and present management and other individuals having information pertinent to this review.

A7. Initiate the following Tasks B through H, and any additional tasks deemed necessary to meet the independent review objective.

I A8. Monitor costs and schedule.

A9 Final Evaluation and Report (See Tasks J and K).

I Milestones (Assume project initiation 3/7/83)

I A1 Program Plan (Initial Issue / Reassessment) 3/23-5/13 A2 QAPD 3/23 I A3 Introductory meetings with CG&E 4/27 A4 Project management documents 3/30 & 4/29 A5 Survey team meetings with CG&E 5/2 - 5/6 A6 Follow-up meetings 5/16 - 6/10 A7 Tasks B through H 3/21 - 7/1 A8 Monitor costs / schedules On-going A9 Final Evaluation and Report 7/15 I

I I

I 6

I

W W W W W W W W W W W W W M M M W W W TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE PAGE OF A DIVISION OF GENERAL ATOMsC COMPANY REVISION LTH TASK A - TPT PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND INTECRATION DATE PROJECT TliLE PROJECT MANAGER MAR APR l MAY JUN JUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY l l l W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 PROJECT INITIATION 3/7 1f T FORMAL AUTIK RIZATION PUBLIC MEETINGS Y y y Al PROGRAM PLAN T 3f REASSESS A2 PREPARE & ISSUE QAPD A3 INTRODUCTORY MEETINGS W/CG&l, Y A4 RECEIVE PROJECT MGT. DOCS. Y V AS SURVEY TEAM MEETINGS W/CG&E Y j A6 FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEWS INITIAL A7 TASKS B TilRU H Y

A8 HONITOR COST /SCllEDULE ON COINi; l

i A9 FINAL REPORT (TASK J & K) l l

l l

1 i

4 1

l GA 1/57 (Hev 8 f0)

I I TASK B - EVALUATION OF CG&E PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION I Objective To evaluate the CG&E Project Management Organization for the Zimmer 1 NPS, to determi.ne whether deficiencies existed in its structure, staffing, policies and/or procedures that have kept implementation of the project from meeting the high standards required for nuclear power plant design, I procurement and construction. Evaluation of CG&E's interfaces with major subcontractors will be evaluated under Task F.

Subtasks B1. Prepare a procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

B2. Evaluate the CG&E project organization structure based on the infor-mation and interviews described in Task A. The evaluation will assess I project management visibility, staffing adequacy and qualification, clarity of position descriptions, inter-organizational relationships, scope, communications, document control, and performance measurement systems. The possibility for and existence of an informal organiza-tional structure will be investigated also.

I B3 Evaluate CG&E project policies to determine if project management responsibilities and authority are clearly and adequately defined for all project act'.vities on Zimmer.

I .

B4. Evaluate CG&E project management system and procedures to determine if procedures are available which clearly define how policies and respon-I sibilities are intended to be implemented. Selected documentation will be examined and interviews held to determine if the procedures have been effectively implemented in practice.

I I

I

I I B5. Evaluate CG&E project management systems and procedures to determine if they adequately and effectively control all interfaces between internal organizations. Interfaces between the CG&E project organiza-tion and major subcontractors will be evaluated under Task F. Se-lected documentation will be examined and interviews will be held to determine if the management systems have been implemented in practice.

B6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task B.

I Milestones B1 Procedures (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/20 B2 Evaluate organization structure 5/27 B3 Evaluate project policies 5/27 B4 Evaluate project procedures 6/17 B5 Evaluate project management systems for interface control 6/17 B6 Internal summary report 6/24 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

5 L 1 M U J

8 W g o

l 1

W 4 2

Y e H E T cT T N a L A U 7 p N D J 1 M O I

S I

V N 0 E

A 1 L

R Y M N E

l 3 J I

. V I M A 7

2 I

I 0

M T R E

2 N

E G Y M A A 3 L E N H 1 A G A N M A N

M T

I F

A C M E 6 l

J T O C

M E L

E J

R P

9 2

U O N D R O E P I l

l T 2 C E A 2 M S & Z C I T C N T C A N E F G E R 5 J O R M P 1 O O E A M R P

N O

G A

I N 8 T A A M M

U L T l V A C 1 T

V E F E J A O R

_ - R 5

D P

M B K

R E

2 S M A M R 8 T I A 1 Z M F

1 O 1 W

E I

M Y N

A V

E R

E

/

W S S

N T P EN O S M T I O RI Y T YC O N CI OT S R N I T FI O W GC OM LO I

E D

N E

Y T

I O

I T

LA OR PE SI EF N TO GR MT L

P E

R P V A D RE N Y OTA E I

T Z TI UD TO Y E S NL A D C I N

CS EN D

EY CC E

R A

mRROINCE E HR EE N

N I A

/

M A

G R

JO OC R

PR CT OI RL J E OC R A I

D F

U TPT G F E E

T S

E O

E E PI B

P F R

S 0)

O L i

R ER EP EI E E L 8

_m N T K U TU TO TS TT A 8 O

I T R D AT AR AN AN N v l

E UC UP UO UI R e i

v T O C LU L LP L E i C W O AR AR AS A R T R(

D E R VT VO VE V O N 7 A J P ES EF ER E F I 5

_m 7

O 1 H 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 A P B B B B B B G

~

TASK C - EVALUATION OF CG&E MANAGEMENT POLICIES TOWARD QUALITY ASSURANCE In the context used herein, the term " quality assurance" includes control measures implemented by all persons performing quality-related activities and is not limited to activities of the QA Department.

Objective I To review and evaluate CG&E'S project management policies which affect quality assurance, and to assess the degree to which management involvement and commitment towards quality is adequate to assure an effective Quality Assurance program. I Subtasks C1. Prepare a procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

C2. Evaluate the organization level and status of the CG&E QA Department I to determine if the level and status are consistent with that required for an effective QA program.

C3 Evaluate the CG&E QA Department's access to upper management to deter-mine if QA program status and problems can be, and have been, brought to the attention of upper management and acted upon, as appropriate, in a timely manner.

Identify and interview appropriate personnel and obtain relevant I C4.

supporting quality assurance related documents as a follow up to the initial survey in Task A to provide a basis for the following evalua-tions.

C5. Evaluate the CG&E QA Department's involvement in project activities to determine if the QA Department is sufficiently involved to help assure adequate control and cognizance over the project.

I

I C6. Evaluate CG&E management's involvement in quality assurance activities to determine if management is sufficiently involved to provide an appropriate level of support and status to the QA program. Evaluation will include organizational level of QA with relation to line and site managers responsible for activities affecting quality, communication channels between QA and other senior management positions, distribu-tion of QA reports to management, QA and project meeting attendance and CG&E policy statements regarding QA.

I C7 Evaluate the CG&E project management attitude and commitment toward quality assurance. Assess impact with respect to resulting effective-ness of the QA Department, quality program, quality-related imple-menting procedures, management's quality assurance responsibilities, and the role of quality assurance in achieving a facility of adequate quality.

C8. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task C.

I Milestones C1 Procedure 4/6-5/20 C2 Level and status of QA Department 6/3 C3 QA Department access to management 6/3 C4 Follow-up interviews, document collection 6/10 C5 QA Department involvement in project activities 6/17 I C6 C7 Management involvement in QA activities Management attitude toward quality assurance 6/17 6/17 C8 Internal summary report 6/24 I

I l I

12 l l

l l

W W W M M M M M M M M W W M TORREY PINES PR JEC SCHEDM.E TECHNOLOGY A DIVISION OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY TASK C - EVALUATION OF CC&E MANACEMENT POLICIES REVISION LTR DATE TOWARD QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJEC T TITL E INDWENDM REM OF ZIMER PROM MACDM PROJECT M ANAGER A. J. NEYLAN MAR l APR l MAY l JUN l JUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY U/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 DI AFilf F :NAL Cl PROCEDURES 37 C2 LEVEL & STATUS OF QA DEPT.

Y V

03 QA DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO MANAGEMENT l

, C4 FOLLOW llP INTERVIEWS, 5I IX)CUMENT COLLECTION C5 QA DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT II IN PROJECT ACTIVITIES C6 MAi4ACEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN TI QA ACTIVITIES C7 MANAGEMENT ATTITUDE TOWARD Y QUALITY ASSURANCE C8 INTERNAL Sil}9fARY REPORT 17 w

j 1

] GA 1757 (llev 8 80)

I I TASK D - EVALUATION OF CG&E MANAGEMENT OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM I Objective:

To review and evaluate CG&E's management of the QA Program to determine if systems, procedures and techniques have been established and that the QA Program is adequate and effectively implemented.

Subtasks I D1. Prepare a procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

D2. Determine management's control of the adequacy of cg&e's qa program by evaluating the methods used to assure that the documented qa system meets the requirements of the paar, chapter 17; 10CFR50, Appendix B; and ANSI Std. N45.2.

D3 Review the results of the evaluations performed by CG&E to investigate major quality-related problems experienced at Zimmer. Assess the thoroughness and accuracy of these evaluations and the actions taken by management to implement the recommendations.

D4. Review management of the QA program by CG&E in the following areas:

I a. Work Instructions - developing, maintaining and implementing sub-tier procedures and instructions for work and inspections I

that affect quality. ,

1 l

b. Training and Indoctrination -

establishing and implementing appropriate quality-related training programs and employee indoc-trination.

14 1

I I c. Qualification, Certification - assuring that personnel performing quality-related activities are certified as being properly train-ed and qualified.

d. Procurement Controls - effectively communicating quality require-ments in procurement documents, assessing the capability of suppliers, and surveillance of supplier activities.

e. Design Controls - effectively reviewing design control processes I and practices of major contractors.

f. PSAR/ Code Controls - establishing and implementing a system to assure that PSAR and Code commitments are met, design changes are compatible with PSAR/ Code, PSAR changes are carried out in the design.

I g. CG&E overview - establishing and implementing effective programs I in the area of audits, surveillance, inspection and independent assessments of contractor activities.

l

h. Records - establishing and implementing a quality records control i i

system which meets the requirements for assuring validity, accu-racy, completeness and traceability of records in a retrievable manner.

l

1. Control of Nonconformances - establishing and implementing an I effective system for documenting and reporting deficiencies, including reports to the NRC and the policy / procedures for imple-menting "stop work."

j.

Corrective Action /Cause Analysis - estab'11shing and implementing the system to assure that significant deficiencies are investi-gated and corrected promptly by an effective priority action system including a means for assessing a cause of problems and I analysis of deficiency trends.

I j

I I k. Tracking Systems - establishing and implementing the effective means for tracking activities, action items, open items and the I follow up of problems.

DS. Evaluate CG&E's QA program interface relationships with Sargent &

Lundy, Kaiser Engineers, and General Electric Company. Measure con-formance to requirements for assuring transmission of information and records relating to quality. The evaluation will also examine quality-related interfaces between CG&E's QA, Project, and Construc-tion and Operations organizations, to assure that the QA program structure and supporting procedures necessary to effective implementa-I tion are in place.

D6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task D.

Milestones I D1 D2 Procedures (Draf t/ Final)

CG&E's QA Program Adequacy 4/6-5/20 6/10 D3 CG&E Evaluation of Quality Problems 6/10 D4 CG&E QA Program Implementation 6/10

a. Work Instructions

b. Training and Indoctrination

c. Qualification, Certification

d. Procurement Controls

e. Design Controls

, f. FSAR/ Code Controls

g. CG&E Overview

h. Records I i. Control of Nonconformances '

j. Corrective Action

k. Tracking Systems D5 CG&E QA Program Interfaces 6/14 D6 Internal Summary Report 6/24 I

16

m

• M M W W W W W W TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE PAGE OF O DIVISION OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY REVISION LTR TASK D - EVALUATION OF CG6E'S MANAGEMENT OF THE DATE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM PHOJECT TITLE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGER A. J. NEYT.AN MAR l APR l MAY l JUN l JUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 DI PROCEDURES W D2 CG&E'S QA PROGRAM ADEQUACY Y D3 CG6E EVALUATION OF QUALITY y PROBLEMS D4 CG6E QA PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATJ ON Y DS CGEE QA PROGRAM INTERFACES U l

D6 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT Tf

~

GA 175/ (th v 8/80)

I TASK E - EVALUATICN OF CG&E'S QUALITY CONFIRMATION PROGRAM Objective Review and evaluate CG&E's management of the Quality Confirmation Program to determine its adequacy and effectiveness in achieving the objec-tives and the commitments of the program.

Subtasks E1.

I Prepare procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

E2. Evaluate the management controls in place to assure that the objec-tives and commitments of the Quality Confirmation Program (QCP) are met.

a. Evaluate organization structure for effective management control of the QCP and assure that management personnel clearly understand their relationships regarding the QCP, including their author-ities, responsibilities, and accountabilities. Includes staffing level and use of contractor personnel.

b. Examine and evaluate qualifications including technical knowledge and mnagement skills of personnel in supervisory / management positions.

c. Review the QCP to determine that:

1. Steps have been taken to assure uniform understanding of the I scope and envelope of each of the action commitments.

2. QCP management has assured the project is broken into elements

of work that are addressed in an orderly, controlled manner.

I

, ,e

I 3 Each commitment listed in the action section of the QCP plan has been addressed in implementing procedures.

I

d. Determine that appropriate management tools are in place to pro-vide QCP management with:

1. Effective planning

2. Implementing procedures 3 Tracking, reporting, and procedural compliance system used to stay abreast of activities in each area of responsibility

4. Program status information, reporting methods I 5. Organizational interface information

6. Training 7 Schedule information.

e. Evaluate CG&E management's action on problems encountered with the QCP with respect to timely detection, root cause identification, resolution, and instituting preventive measures.

Review the results of CG&E's own evaluations and audits of the I E3 effectiveness of the QCP including evaluations of major problems experienced in its implementation. Assess adequacy and accuracy of CG&E evaluations.

E4. Assess the existing CG&E management structure and capability to suc-cessfully develop and complete the broader scope of a Quality Verification Plan (QVP).

Evaluate the results of Subtasks E2, E3 and E4 and make recommenda-I E5.

tions for completing the program and meeting program objectives and commitments.

E6. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task E.

19 l l

I I Milestones El Procedures (Draf t/Finsi) 4/6-5/20 E2 Quality confirmatica review 6/10 E3 CG&E's evaluatica of the QCP 6/10 E4 Capability to develop a QVP 6/10 ES Evaluate .-esults 6/17 ES Interr.a1 summary report 6/24 I

1 1

I 20

TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCIIEDULE PAGE OF O DIVISION OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY REVISION LTR TASK E - EVALUATION OF CC6E QUALITY CONFIRMATION DATE PROGRAM INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIta1ER PROJECT !!ANAGEMENT PROJECT M ANAGER A. J. NEYLAN PROJECT TIILE l APR l MAY l JUN l JUI.

WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E I1 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 is E1 PROCEDURES DUAFTl f F :NAL y E2 QUALITY CONFIRMATION REVIEW If E3 CG&E EVALUATION OF Tile QCP Kf i

i E4 CAPABILITY TO DEVELOP A QVP Kf

, ES EVALUATE RESULTS Tf f

, E6 INTERNAL SUt&tARY REPORT 37 l

N i

GA l/57 (fhiv 6 60) 4

I I TASK F - EVALUATION OF CG&E'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT INTERFACES WITH MAJOR I SUBCONTRACTORS Objective To evaluate the adequacy of CG&E's project management's methods for (a) administration and control of the work of major subcontractors and suppliers, and (b) for managing changes to their work and contracts to ensure effective control of performance. The evaluation will be made by determining if CG&E's project procedures on Zimmer 1 NPS were defined and I implemented in a manner to assure that major subcontractors were made aware of and fulfilled their responsibilities. The evaluation within this task will include CG&E interfaces with Sargent & Lundy, H. J. Kaiser Engineers, General Electric Company and Catalytic Corporation.

Subtasks F1. Prepare a procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

F2. Evaluate the Zimmer 1 project management staff and structure, based on the information and interviews described in Tasks A & B, for ability to control subcontractor interfaces and monitor subcontractor perfor-mance. This will be accomplished, in conjunction with Tasks A and B, by reviewing the education, skills, and experience of the project staff and their access to upper management.

F3 Evaluate Zimmer 1 project management procedures for controlling inter-faces with major subcontractors by examining procedural requirements I for the following items:

o definition of responsibilities o established lines of communication o review of subcontractor activities I

I 22 l J

I I o preparation and utilization of schedules to prioritize and coordi-I nate work -

o verification of subcontractor performance o identification of problem areas o methods of problem resolution F4. Evaluate whether project procedures have been implemented by inter-viewing key personnel and examining a representative sample of project work statements, meeting notes, reports, memoranda, and correspondence for compliance with the requirements. The sample will include design and construction interfaces between CG&E and Sargent and Lundy, H. J.

Kaiser, Catalytic Corporation, and General Electric as appropriate.

F5. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task F.

I Milestones I F1 Procedures 5/20 F2 6/10 I

Organization and interfaces F3 Project procedures 6/10 F4 Implementation of procedures 6/10 F5 Internal summary report 6/24 I

I l I l

I I

m M W m M M M M M M M M M M M TORREY PlNES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE PAGE OF O DIVISION OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY TASK F - EVALUATION OF CC&E PROJECT MANAGEMENT INTERFACES REVISION LTR WTTil MAJOR SIIBCONTRACTORS DATE PROJEC I ll T L E INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGER A. J. NEYT.AN MAR l APR l MAY l JUN _ l JUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15

DRAF.. F1 NAL F1 PROCEDURES 1f jf l F2 ORGANIZATION & INTERFACES I F3 PROJECT PROCEDURES F4 IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCEDUREt Y F5 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT 3y i

)

i (iA 17:>/ (Hev ti 80)

I TASK G - EVALUATION OF PLANNED TRANSITION FROM PLANT CONSTRUCTION TO OPERATIONS PHASE Objective To review existing procedures and the methods by which these procc-dures are to be implemented in the transition of the plant from the con-struction phase to the operations phase. The review will cover organiza-tion and procedures. Follow-through to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the planned transition is not included within the scope of this task.

Subtasks G1. Prepare a procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

I G2. Review the overall performance of the Transition Program carried out from its inception to November 1982 to provide insight into the effectiveness of project management's implementation of the prodram.

I This insight will be used to develop recommendations for the future.

G3 Review those policies and procedures which establish the responsi-bility and jurisdiction of organizations involved in the planned future transition from construction to operations. Procedures will be reviewed for:

(a) Definition of when a particular plant system is ready for final construction checkout, preoperational testing, startup testing, I

or for retesting.

(b) Specification of tre jurisdiction and responsibility of each organization invo]ved in or responsible for receiving plant systems at comple', ion of construction and for conducting required I

I 25

I I tests, interpretation / acceptance of the results, and turnover to succeeding test programs, or in determination that retesting is I required.

(c) Specification of the plant condition and documentation required at turnover from construction to operations, and from one test phase to the next, and identification of deficiencies and/or exceptions which exist at the time of turnover.

I (d) Definition of the tracking systems used to monitor items that are incomplete at the time of conditional turnover and items that are identified during testing as requiring resolution.

(e) Specification of the methods by which the functions of the various organizations are to be coordinated to complete the transition as expeditiously as feasible.

G4. Prepare Summary Report for the Results of Task G.

I Milestones G1 Procedure (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/20 G2 Historical review of the prior transition phase 5/27 G3 Organizational policies and procedure review 6/10 G4 Internal summary report 6/24 l I 1 I

I ,

26 l I - __

m m m M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE PAGE Of Q DIVISION Of GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY TASK G - EVALUATION OF PLANNED TRANSITION FROM PLANT REVISION LTR DATE CONSTRUCTION TO OPERATIONS PilASE PHOJECT TliLE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZitE!ER PROJECT !!ANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGER A.J. NEYLAN MAR l APR l MAY l JUN l JUI.

WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 Cl PROCEDURES C2 IIISTORICAL REVIEW OF PRIOR I I TRANSITION PilASE G3 ORGANTZATIONAL POLICIES AND Y PROCEDURE REVIEW i .

G4 INTERNAL SUt&lARY REPORT II 4

t

l l

c.A USl W.v UEO)

I I TASK H - EVALUATION OF CG&E MANAGENENT OF ZIMMER THROUGH THE CASE STUDY APPROACH Objective I To assess CG&E management's role and behavior in response to selected specific problems and/or series of events. The purpose is to use the " case study" approach as a cross-check of the observations and conclusions reach- l I ed separately in each of the other tasks within this review.

Subtasks I

Each of the following events / problem areas will be evaluated using the procedure outlined in subtasks H1 through H4 noted below, o CG&E management attitude toward " whistle blowers" o Structural steel in the control room 2400 feet of small bore piping I o o Welder qualification H1. Review existing documentation on the description of the problem, how it was detected, analysis performed on the problem and determination of its direct and root causes, and corrective actions authorized, taken, and verified. Determine the key people involved for interview about the problem.

I H2. Conduct interviews of key people associated with the problem and corroborate their testimony with others and available documentation.

l H3 Evaluate the effectiveness of CG&E's management in investigating and reporting the problem and for authorizing, controlling, and verifying problem analysis and corrective action.

H4. Compare management's role and behavior with the observations and ~

conclusions reached separately in each of the other tasks within this review. Report the results in an internal summary report.

I 28 I l

I I  :

1 Milestones

)

H1 Gather existing documentation 5/27 H2 Gather additional information 6/10 H3 Evaluate CG&E management 6/24 H4 Internal summary report 7/1 I

I I

I ,

Ie .

I I .

l I

I I

I .

I 29

m m W W W W -

m m m m m a e m W W W TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCIIEDULE PAGE OF A DIVIS60N OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY REVISION LTR TASK 11 - EVALUATION OF CG&E'S MANAGEMENT DATE OF ZIMMER THROUGH THE CASE STUDY APPROACH PROJECi llTL E INDEPENDENT REVIE'J OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MAN AGER A. . NUW MAR APR MAY JUN JUL WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 l 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 3 15 111 CATilER EXISTING DOCUMENTATI( N Y 112 CATilER ADDITIONAL INFORMATI( N If 113 EVALUATE CC&S MANAGEMENT If 114 INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT s

GA 1757 (flew 4180)

I

I l I TASK J - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS Objective To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various alternate organizational structures for the management of the Zimmer 1 Nuclear Pro-ject and to provide a basis for recommending the one most likely to assure that the high standards required of nuclear power plant design, procurement I and construction are met.

Subtasks J1. Prepare a procedure to accomplish the evaluation described below.

J2. Review the results of tasks A through H to determine what problems occurred in the management and quality assurance programs of the Zimmer 1 Project. Emphasis will be placed on identification of organ-I izational structure or elements which could (a) negatively affect such things as communication between the various groups and top management, (b) result in any missing, diffused or unclear lines of responsibility and authority, and (c) limit the proper implementation of procedures to control the work.

I J3 Interview cognizant personnel, in conjunction with Task A, to obtain and assess ideas and evidence concerning potential management and organization changes which would improve project performance.

I J4. Evaluate at least four alternatives for the management of the Zimmer 1 project as called out in the NRC order suspending construction (CLI-82-33). Include evaluation of procedural and organizational changes that have been implemented and/or proposed by CG&E since the stop work order. Review the alternatives to see what advantages and disadvan-tages would exist if applied to the Zimmer project including consider-ation of the Oc lowing.

I 31

i I (a) Comparison with approaches to the management of other nuclear projects in evaluating the alternatives for the Zimmer 1 plant.

(b) The NRC requirement in Appendix B of 10CFR50 that requires CG&E as the owner of the plant to be ultimately responsible for all activities associated with its design, construction and opera-tion.

(c) The implications of major organizational change on project continuity.

J5. Prepare a summary report on the work in Task J.

I Milestones I J1 Procedures (Draft / Final) 4/6-5/27 J2 Task A through H review 7/1 J3 CG&E and contractor interviews 6/10 as J4 Alternate organizational development 6/30 E J5 Interna 1 eummary repore 7/8 I

I I

I 32

W m W W m m m m ~

W m m TORREY PINES i TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCIIEDULE PAGE OF j A oivision or cENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY i TASK J - EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ftEVISION LTR DATE ORGANIZATPJNS l

i PROJECT TITLE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIMMER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MAN AGER A. J. HmN l

MAR l APR l MAY I JUN l JUI.

WORK ITEM / ACTIVITY W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 Jl PROCEDURES DIAFTl f F1 NAL y ,

J2 TASKS A TilRU 11 REVIEW Y J3 CG&E & CONTRACTOR INTERVIEW 1 J4 ALTERNATE ORGANIZATIONAL -

Y DEVELOPMENT i

JS INTERNAL

SUMMARY

REPORT l

l U

GA 1757 (liev 8 80)

3 1

I I TASK K - REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I Objectives  !

I Prepare bi-weekly reports on the evaluation and progress. Prepare, review and issue a final evaluation report.

Subtasks K1. Prepare and submit biweekly progress reports to CG&E for information.

All communications will be simultaneously transmitted to the NRC.

K2. Prepare a final report compiling all results of the review. The report will include a description of the work performed under Tasks A through J, an identification of documents used in or generated by this project, the results of the review, and the conclusions drawn from each task, and final recommendations.

The final report will be in two volumes: an Executive F,ummary Volume, and a Discussion Volume. The report will be submitted simultaneously to CG&E and the NRC.

I Milestones I K1 Bi-weekly progress reports 5/6, 5/20, 6/3, 6/17, 7/1 K2 Publish Final Report 7/15 I

I I

I

, so

e e e m W W E E E TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY PROJECT SCllEDULE Q DIVISION OF GENERAL ATOMIC COMPANY PAGE OF TASK K - REPORTS AND REC 0telENDATIONS REVISION LTR DATE P110 JECT TITLE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF ZIIDER PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGER A. J. NEYLAN MAR l APR l HAY l JUN Jun WORK l TEM / ACTIVITY l W/E 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 'n 15 K1 BI-WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORTS K2 PUBLISil FINAL REPORT Y i

GA 1757 (Hev tl 110) i