ML20072F092
| ML20072F092 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1983 |
| From: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 14509, 83-06-17, 83-6-17, NUDOCS 8306270262 | |
| Download: ML20072F092 (5) | |
Text
r JMINCIPAL STAFF 1]A RU ENF 7,
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
$$)
I39 DPPP Il[0jj P.O. Box 2325, BOSTON. M ASSACHUSETTS O2107 ORMA 60 l
(
EPf4sr I
f
{h-SA f l LE lVe }
g,yg OL 1
Mr. J.G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III June 17, 1983 Nuclear ReCulatory Commission J.0. No.
14509 799 Rossevelt Road NRC File #83-06-17 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
SUBJECT:
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW (June 1, 1983)
A copy of observations noted by CIO of the Management Review Committee of the discussions reldt.ing to the Quality Verification Program is attached for your review and consideration. CIO has commented upon three subjects and have in-dicated conditional approval of QPV.
If you have any questions with respect to this report, please contact me at (517) 631-4286, extension 486.
Very truly yours, 5
S.W. Baranow Program Manager Enclosure SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, NRC Midland (site)
DBMiller, CPCo Midland (site)
RBKelly, S&W APamaruso, S&W DON 22 US 8306270262 830617 PDR ADOCK 05000329 A
PDR 1 N/
j
?.
MANAGEMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW OBSERVATIONS REFERENCES - MEMO -
R. Wells to J. Cook June 7, 1983 Meeting Agenda June 1, 1983 The agenda (copy attached) consisted of 7 items thef.i'st 4 of which were r
satisfactorily dispositioned at the April 29 meeting.
Item 5 - (Management Review Audit Team) identified 23 observations and the validity of these observations was accepted. Responsibility and target dates were assignedto each observations.
Item 6 - (Constraints) addressed the 23 observations and their impact on the Quality Verification Program (QVP)(see memo attached). Subsequent correspondence indicates that MPQAD categorizes these observations as " constraints" to QPV or " Desirable as soon as possible," 14 observations falling into the first category and 8 into the latter. The remaining observations, which concerns the development of a matrix of tommittments made by CPCo to NRC is considered as a constraint by the Management hview Audit Team and " Desirable ASAP" by MPQAD.
CIO agrees with these determinations and considers that the development of a matrix indicating committments to the NRC, responsibility and target date is a constraint to QPV.
Item 7 - (Recommendations) addresses 23 observations in subsequent correspondence.
MPQAD recommends that the QPV is accepted. The recommendation is based upon the fact that the 14 " constraint" observations relate to procedures that are in draft or review and that issJe of the procedures will remove constraints.
The committee is expected to take appropriate action on the " constraint" issue.
All items on the agenda were satisfactorily dispositioned.
During subsequent discussion CPCo indicated that trend analysis of NCRs would be performed by a consultant and in response to a question by CIO stated that procedures and job descriptions for that consultant would be available.
CIO also questioned if job descriptions were available for MPQAD personnel implementing the QVP and was advised that the descriptions are aitailable.
CIO considers-the QVP acceptable with the following conditions.
(a) Copiesof Job descriptions of MPQAD personnel assigned QVP duties is requested (b) The matrix of CPCo committment to NRC should be complete (c) The 14 requred to resolve Management Review Team Observations should be approved and issued
. j~
- (
To JWCook
(]
DBMiller 9
U Fam4 RAWells
=
04rc June 7, 83 POIN$f Sues e cT MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT QVP MANAGEMENT REVIEW OPEN ITEMS g
FILE 23.0 SERIAL 22848 connesconocuce CC
'BPalmer ^
SBaranow (S&W) w/ Reference
/
Reference:
CPCo Serial 22834 dated 6/3/83 - Midland Energy Center Project Quality Verification Program Management Review On June 3, 1983, you were copied on a letter to J A Rutgers from Brien Palmer for me which provided minutes of the June 1, 1983, QVP Management Review and a final punchlist of open items pertaining to implementation of the QVP. The punchlist of open items was included as Attachment C to the minutes and to the best of my knowledge, captures all of the open issues covered by Reference A through F as noted on the cover sheet to Attachment C.
It should, therefore, xq) be a complete list. The task of our management team is to identify which of the open issues are truly constraints to implementing the Q7P.
In order to help us reach a conclusion, I cm recommending below which of the items on Attach-ment C that.I_see as a constraint and which are desirable but not a constraint:
Item Forecast Ccmpletion Date 1.
Constraints 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 - All of these' relate to resolution oi_ comments on and approv W issue of procedures 6/13/83 - Issue Date 2.
Desirable As Soon As Possible 1
- PQCI Improvements 6/9/83 2, 3 - IR Data Base Improvements 7/31/83 5
- Materi.si Traceability (Advise Mgmt) 6/10/83 6
- Inspection Process Control System 8/5/83 10
- Topical Report Organization Changes 6/22/83 13* - Commitment Matrix 6/10/83 14
- Issue QVP Closed 15
- Inspection Safety on T/O Systems No Date Yet
{
(*The Management Review Team reconmends this as a constraint)
o -.
o
- .t My analysis of the above indicates that when the procedures now in draft A
stage there will~be no conscraints to QVP implementation and I recom-are issued, that O
mend this position to the Management Review Group.
I am requesting that J W Cook take action as he feels appropriate as chairman of the Management Review Group to confirm or modify my recommendation to establish
- the Management Review Group's position.
jln i
i i
O e,
t 1
I f
i
.i O
1
.......__----_.-..-.-_....r,
,_-..-_...,,-m._.,-,-,,-_.-__-_-,.
, i.
.~.
AGENDA FOR MANAGEMENT REVIEW OF QUALITY VERIFICATION PROGRAM (6-1-83)
I.
Activity Scope and Purpose Palmer M II.
Organization Palmer MIII.
Procedures Palmer
/ IV.
Training and Schedule Palmer 3
V.
Management Review Audit Slade VI.
Constraints f '**
Palmer
's VII.
Reconumendations Wells
~
-O
/
N
/
1 I
- O
.. -. - - -. _ - - _... _, _, - - -,. _ -,.... _... _... _ -. ~, _ _
- - -