ML20072E083

Interim Deficiency Rept Re Inadequate Review of Condition Identification & Work Authorization Forms for Reportability. QA Group Screening Forms for Reportability.Possibly 10,000 Forms May Require Screening.Next Rept by 830510

ML20072E083
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	03/15/1983
From:	Maurin L LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	Jay Collins NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, W3I83-0084, W3I83-84, NUDOCS 8303210569
Download: ML20072E083 (3)

Text

-

i I OUISIANA 24a OuAnONOc S1 ster P O W E R & L i G H T! A O BOX 6008

• NEW OR' EANS. LOUISIANA . (504) 366 234570174 mias March 15, 1983 t. v MAunin Yce Presnient Nuclear Operatens W3183-0084 Q-3-A35.07.71 Mr. John T. Collins, Regional Administrator j\[ iU Region IV L-}' p: = -l [

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ;A 611 Ryan 121aza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76012 ji MAR I 61983 i-L

[!'[.

SUBJECT:

Waterford SES Unit No. 3 }

Docket No. 50-382 Significant Construction Deficiency Report No. 71

" Inadequate Review of CIWAs for Reportability" First Interim Report

REFERENCE:

Telecon from M. A. Livesay (LP&L) to W. A. Crossman (NRC) on 2/11/83

Dear Mr. Collins:

In accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e), we are hereby providing two copies of the interim report of Significant Construction Deficiency No. 71,

" Inadequate Review of CIWAs for Repoetability". This item was originally fdentified as PRD 101.

Very truly yours,

.)

$/N/tht-L. V. Maurin LVM/ MAL:keh cc: 1) Director 3) Mr. E. L. Blake Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

2) Director 4) Mr. W. M. Stevenson Office of Management Information and Program Control U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

/.

8303210569 830315 PDR ADOCK 05000382 S PDR

u

,, i-INTERIM REPORT OF SIGNIFICANT CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCY NO. 71 l

" INADEQUATE REVIEW OF CIWA's FOR REPORTABILITY" INTRODUCTION This. report is submitted pursuant to 10CFR50.55(e). It describes a failure to properly review Condition Identification and Work Authorization (CIWA) forms for reportability. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been

' identified.to the NRC pursuant to 10CFR21.

DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY The C1RA. form is being used for identification, documentation, evaluation, and correction'of corditions discoverea at Waterford 3. CIWAs are ruuted through Ebasco Start Up, Ebasco ESSE, or the LP&L Work Group for disposition and corrective action.

CIWAs routed.co Ebasco Start Up are evaluated for reportability per the Ebasco N-23 procedure. It has been discovered, however, that CIW.is routed to ESSE and the LP&L Work Group (ainee June, 1981) are not being formally evaluated for reportability.

SAFETY IMPLICATIONS Since the review of CIWAs has not been properly performed, it is possible that the NRC has not been notified of some significant construction deficiencies.

CORRECTIVE ACTION To correct this condition, the following action has been taken by LP&L. The Quality Assurance (QA) group has been assigned the responsibility of performing an initial screening of CIWAs for reportability in accordance with QP19.3, "CIWA Reportability Screening". CIWAs which could be reportable are transmitted to the Onsite Licensing section for the final reportability determination in accordance with NAP-117, " Identification, Evaluation, and Reporting of 10CFR50.55(e)

Deficiencies".

The screening by QA will be performed for all CIWAs directed to Ebasco ESSE (historical), CIWAs written from June, 1981 to present that were worked by the LP&L Work Group (historical), and those which are being generated on a day to day basis (ongoing) . A listing of all CIWAs is currently being reviewed to determine which CIWAs require review. Those requiring review are logged to document the review and screening determination. A similar log book is being used by Onsite Licensing to document the review, and an evaluation checklist is being used to document the reportability determination.

At:the present time, an accurate total number of CIWAs involved has not been determined. It is estimated that as many as 10,000 historical CIWAs may require screening for reportability. The review of CIWAs which are generated on a day to day basis is currently underway. There are approximately 100 CIWAs generated each day.

i

... t I CORRECTIVE. ACTION (cent'd.)

The details of'the notification and reporting of these CIWAs to the NRC is being discussed and coordinated with L. Martin of Region IV. Further information concerning the scope of this condition and the details of the  ;

corrective action will be provided by May 10, 1983. '

l I

l I

i  !

I

[

t l

l i

l i

l l i i

i t

l

_ . - - . - . __.