|
---|
Category:REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE REPORT (SEE ALSO AO LER)
MONTHYEARML20072D5071994-07-27027 July 1994 Ro:On 940722,drift of Temp Trip Setting of Primary Coolant Occurred.Suspect Drift Occurred Since 940522 Due to Failure of Compressor That Provides Bldg Compressed Air.New Equipment Ordered to Replace Current Unit 1994-07-27
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20210E9411999-07-22022 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 14 to License R-97 ML20207A6541999-02-26026 February 1999 1998 Annual Rept for Ga Institute of Technology Research Reactor. New TS No Longer Require Annual Operating Rept to Be Submitted to Nrc.Rept Submitted Since Facility Under Previous TS for Portion of CY98 ML20155G9901998-11-0404 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 13 to License R-97 ML20236Q0781998-06-0404 June 1998 Rev 3 to 82A9083, Ga Inst of Technology Research Reactor Decommissioning Plan ML20217K7981998-04-0202 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 12 to License R-97 ML20203H0571998-02-24024 February 1998 1997 Annual Rept for Ga Institute of Technology Research Reactor ML20135D2821996-12-31031 December 1996 1996 Annual Rept for Ga Institute of Technology Research Reactor ML20106G4281996-02-27027 February 1996 Annual Rept for Ga Inst of Technology Research Reactor for CY95 ML20078A0001995-01-10010 January 1995 SAR for 5 MW Ga Tech Research Reactor, Revised from First Submittal,Apr 1994 ML20149G8581994-10-31031 October 1994 Provides NRC W/Error Notice Received from Former Software Supplier ML20072D5071994-07-27027 July 1994 Ro:On 940722,drift of Temp Trip Setting of Primary Coolant Occurred.Suspect Drift Occurred Since 940522 Due to Failure of Compressor That Provides Bldg Compressed Air.New Equipment Ordered to Replace Current Unit ML20070M9701994-04-30030 April 1994 SAR for 5 MW Georgia Tech Research Reactor. W/Financial Qualifications of Georgia Institute of Technology to Operate Georgia Tech Research Reactor ML20064N3581994-03-31031 March 1994 Nucleate Boiling Characteristics & Critical Heat Flux Occurrence in Subcooled Axial-Flow Water Sys ML20063L4971994-02-25025 February 1994 Annual Rept for Ga Inst of Technology Research Reactor ML20058L9001993-05-0404 May 1993 Part 21 Rept Consisting of Gtices Program Error Notice 93.14 Re Ibm RS6000 Computers Gt Modeler Recovery File.Resized Graphics Screen Can Not Be Completely Recovered.Lists Customers Not Notified Because of Unknown Current Addresses ML20128A1481992-09-30030 September 1992 Analyses for Conversion of Ga Tech Research Reactor from HEU to LEU Fuel ML20090B3821992-02-24024 February 1992 Annual Rept for 1991 (CY91) for Ga Institute of Technology Research Reactor ML20096H5461991-12-31031 December 1991 Corrected Pages 13 & 14 to Annual Rept,Consisting of Item 7(e) Re Max Cumulative Radiation Dose Which Could Have Been Received by Individual Continuously Present in Unrestricted Area During Reactor Operation ML20079B1551991-06-0707 June 1991 Amend to 1990 Annual Rept - Georgia Tech Research Reactor. Submittal Corrects Error in Item 1.f on Page 5 Re Changes in Plant Staff & Committee Membership ML20065S7981991-01-0202 January 1991 Requalification Program for Reactor Operators/Senior Reactor Operators,Georgia Tech Research Reactor ML20235W8571989-02-21021 February 1989 Annual Rept for 1988 ML20151C0681988-07-12012 July 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 7 to License R-97 ML20154N0061988-04-19019 April 1988 Neely Nuclear Research Ctr Response to NRC Concerns ML20151R1981988-03-29029 March 1988 Rept of Visit to Georgia Tech Research Reactor Facility to Inspect Facilities & to Interview Operational Staff ML20148E3451988-03-14014 March 1988 Incident Rept of Cadmium Spill on 870818 ML20148F3191988-02-26026 February 1988 Annual Rept for 1987.Related Info,Including Revised Procedure 3800, Liquid Waste Disposal Sys, from Chapter 15 of Auxiliary Sys Encl ML20207T4171987-02-16016 February 1987 Annual Rept for 1986,including Operations Summary,Power Generation,Shutdowns,Unscheduled Maint on safety-related Sys & Components & Changes,Test & Experiments W/O Prior NRC Approval ML20235X1721986-12-31031 December 1986 Rev 1 to 1986 Annual Rept, Correcting Several Errors in Section 7, Environ Monitoring ML20137E9871985-10-0303 October 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Order Terminating License R-111 for AGN-201 Reactor ML20009A1861981-03-13013 March 1981 Annual Operating Rept for 1980 ML19310A3451980-05-23023 May 1980 Ro:On 800410,heavy-water Temp Recorder TRA-D1 Was Not Recalibr After Replacement of Worn Sliding Contacts on Scanner Select Switch.Cause Not Stated.Importance of Recalibr Emphasized to Personnel ML19309F1241980-04-14014 April 1980 RO 80-02:on 800305,low Flow Scram of Flow Recorder FRA-D1 Resulted in Reactor Trip & Subsequent Shutdown.Caused by Broken Teflon Gasket Pieces Restricting Flow.Gasket Repaired & Sys Refilled ML19309F0881980-04-11011 April 1980 RO 80-1:on 791009,during ECCS Tank TD-2 Monthly Flow Rate Verification,Flow Rate Observed to Be 8 Gpm.Caused by Loose Lock Nuts Which Fix handle-to-ball Operating Shaft. Surveillance Program Will Be Strengthened ML20009A1891980-02-28028 February 1980 Annual Operating Rept for 1979 ML20009A1901979-03-0707 March 1979 Annual Operating Rept for 1978 1999-07-22
[Table view] |
Text
. -
/, . . . . . ,,\ Georgia Institute of Technology j NEELY NUCLEAR RESEARCH CENTER .
@g,-,1j - 900 ATLANTIC DRIVE ,
'C \
',, # ' '"' ' j ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30332-0425 j gg4 (404)894 3600 1 July 27, 1994 Mr. Craig Bassett U.S. Nnclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 101 Macletta St., N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30323 Dear Mr. Bassett Enclosed please find a report from Mr. Parker concerning the drift of the temperature trip setting of the primary coolant. The i steps taken to assure reliability of this setting include: 1 (1) lowering the trip setting to 124 F so that the current thermocouple simulator may provide accurate test signal, and (2) ;
purchasing a new continuous temperature simulator. Should you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
. f.} . & ,
R.A. Karam, Ph.D., Director Neely Nuclear Research Center RAK/ccg Enclosure-1
. ,c~
G Lo i n
9408190100 940727 /
PDR S
ADOCK 05000161 PDR kqb (k Tedex: $42507 GTRIOCAATL Fax 404-853 9325 (Verdy 404 894-3600)
A und of the Unwersdy System of Georgia An Equal Education anri Employrnerit Opportundy institution
i
. 1 o ;
TO: .
Dr. R. A. Karam, NNRC Director FROM: Dixon F. Parker, Reactor Supervisor '
SUBJECT:
Primary Temperature SCRAM Channel #2 On 7/22/94 a non-licensed NNRC operations employee tested and calibrated the primary coolant system second temperature scram channel as part of a six month calibration procedure. The test requires an as found check of the scram setpoint. The setpoint was found to be 146 F. This is in excess of the Technical Specification Limiting Safety System Setting of 139 F. The scram point was set to 138.2 F at the end of the test. Billy Statham brought this to my attention on 7/26/94, arid together we brought this to your attention that same day.
This scram channel is tested on a weekly basis prior to reactor startup. The weekly test is accomplished by using a thermocouple simulator that provides test signals in 25 F increments. Consequently a signal of either 125*F or 150 F can be used to test the trip setting. Therefore the weekly test does not have adequate resolution to determine if the scram setting is actually below 139 F. There is no prior history of trouble with this l instrument, and there is no positive indication of when the failure occurred. It is possible that the failure occurred during the current extended shutdown of the reactor since 5/25/94 due to failure of the compressor that provides building compressed air.
For a brief time during this period the building air conditioning was out of service and the containment building was humid. It is possible that the humidity caused the channel setpoint to drift. ,
l During the six months since the last calibration reactor operations were at a minimum, '
and at powers such that the reactor outlet temperature never approached 139 F. ,
During the six month period the first primary temperature channel scram was always l I
operational, and the scram on the reactor inlet, set to 124 F, was also operational. I believe the safety implications of this failure are insignificant.
A new piece of equipment has been ordered to replace the current unit. The new unit will allow for temperature indication via a digital panel meter. The digital panel meter will also allow visualinspection of the system setpoint and visualindication that the unit is working by comparison with other temperature monitoring channels. The new unit will allow the weekly channel test to be modified so that the actual system setting can be determined. Until the new equipment is installed the setpoint for the existing unit will be set to approximately 124 F. This will allow the thermocouple simulator to check that the channel setpoint is below 125 F. A channel test will be performed daily prior to reactor startup until the new equipment is installed.
.