ML20071P925

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violation & Deviation Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-298/82-32.Corrective Actions:Employee Completed Medical Physicals & Monitoring Program of Physicals Established
ML20071P925
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/11/1983
From: Pilant J
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Madsen G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20071P918 List:
References
LQA8300012, NUDOCS 8306080219
Download: ML20071P925 (4)


Text

-

s GENERAL OFFICE Nebraska Public Power District eteMoleSS4'fa^!aP'""

LQA8300012

/

April 11, 1983

\\

$gzff

\\

\\b Mr. G. L. Madsen z

Reactor Project Branch I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011

Subject:

NPPD Response to IE Inspection Report No. 50-298/82-32

Dear Mr. Madsen:

This letter is written in response to your letter dated March 7, 1983, trans-mitting Inspection Report No. 50-298/82-32.

Two items were identified during the inspection as being in violation of NRC requirements and one item iden-tified as a deviation from a commitment to the NRC.

As stated in the above letter, the NRC inspector reviewed corrective action in regard to item 1 in Appendix A, Notice of Violation, and therefore, no re-sponse is required for this item.

We were required to submit a reply to you within 30 days of the notice, that is, by April 6, 1983. However, because of delays in attempting to gather more information regarding the deviation and the interference of the recent Emergency Exercise with preparation and review of this response, L. C. Lessor requested and was granted an extension by you on April 6, 1983.

Following is the statement of violation, item 2, Appendix A, Notice of Vio-lation and our response in accordance with 10CFR2.201.

Statement of Violation 10 CFR Part 20.103(C)(2), " Exposure to Individuals to Concentrations of Radioactive Materials in Air in Restricted Areas," requires that a determina-tion by a physician prior to the initici use of respirators, and at least every 12 months thereaf ter, that the individual user is physically able to use the respiratory protective equipment.

Contrary to this requirement, the NRC inspectors found that after an initial determination is made by a physician, the health physics department makes the 12-month determination that an individual user is physically able to use respiratory protective equipment.

8306000219 830519 PDR ADOCK

(.

05000298 PDR

. ~ - - ~

-Mr. G. L. Madsen April 11. 1983-Page 2 Discussion With regard to a determination of the individual user's physical ability to use respiratory protection equipment, the station respiratory protection

_ program was in compliance with 10CFR20.103(C)'until April 15, 1982 when this

- rule was_ amended by 47CFR16162. That amendment introduced a requirement for physician determination of user physical ability at least every twelve months.

Prior-to the amendment, our program complied with NRC guidance which required "only an initial medical determination and an annual review of medical status."

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved Several medical physicals are required to meet NRC requirements for the various activities conducted at CNS.

These activities include such items as fire fighting, visual. examination of new fuel, operator licensing. _ and security-screening as well as use of respiratory protection equipment.

In addition, NPPD management has a corporate interest concerning the medical status of its employees at CM.

However, the requirement for a separate medical examination for each specific activity has introduced a significant fiscal and manpower impact. Much redundancy is also involved, as many medical tests _ are repeated for each type of examination.

To avoid these inefficiencies, CNS has consolidated all the medical physical examination requirements, including' respiratory protection requirements, onto one medical

~

]

form (except for the NRC form for operator licensing program physicals).

Administrative Procedure 1.5 and Health Physics Procedure 9.1.5 have been revised _ to include this form and annual physical examinations which meet respiratory protection standards are now required for all CNS employees.

- These examinations are conducted by a physician.

To date all station employees have completed the medical physical for use of respiratory protection equipment except for those employees who have either

-had a - medical physical within the last six months or are in the operator licensing program. These exceptions will be scheduled for medical physicals within the next six months or in conjunction with their operator licensing physical if they are involved with this program. Physicals will be scheduled such that_all employees will have had a medical examination by a physician

- within the last twelve months.

Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violation A monitoring program has been established to identify the date of the last medical -physical of each employee so they will be medically examined by a Lphysician at least every 12 months.

The Date When Full Compliance'Will Be Achieved We will be in full compliance by November 1, 1983.

i--

7 ws-re v*--

g - - -

y wam_-,-y_,m-w.=~i--ie+y-

-wy.y um py_.pw,evywy-

.,.-,.m_.y-,rwy m,

=4

,q--g-pay-g,,

e.

w--v-

Mr. G. L. Madsen April 11, 1983 Page 3 Following is the statement of deviation in Appendix B, Notice of Deviation and our response in accordance with this Notice of Deviation.

Statement of Deviation IE Bulletin 79-19. " Packaging of Low-Level Radioactive Waste for Transport and Burial," dated August 10, 1979, describes action to be taken by licensees to assure that safe transfer, packaging, and transport of low-level radioactive waste. Specifically, Item 5 requires, in part, that the licensee is expected to maintain a record of training dates, attendees, and subject material for future inspections by NRC personnel. A licensee letter of August 31, 1979, in response to IE Bulletin 79-19, from Jay M. Pilant, Director of Licensing and Quality Assurance, Nebraska Public Power District, to Mr. Karl V. Seyf rit, Director, Region IV, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, stated, in part, in Items 5 and 6 that training records will be available for future inspection by NRC personnel.

In deviation from the above, the NRC inspectors found that training records were not available for two individuals involved in the transfer, packaging, and transport of radioactive material.

Discussion We have contacted the NRC inspector involved to identify the two CNS individu-

-als referred to in the statement of deviation. This effort was partially successful in that one individual was identified. Unfortunately, the second individual whose training records may not have been available has not been identified.

Since it is not clear what responsibility or participation the second individual may have had in the observed radioactive waste handling procedures, this response to the deviation must necessarily be limited to a discussion of the one identified individual involved.

The deviation statement indicates that " training records were not available."

We interpret this to mean that training records did not reflect all the specific training that this individual had received to conduct handling and packaging of radioactive material.

It has been our experience that lecture and. demonstration type training.. while most amenable to documentation and audit, do not adequately prepare an individual to handle and package radioac-tive materials. CNS has established a detailed program of on-the-job training to fully prepare an individual for operating all the various radwaste systems as well as packaging and handling solid radiological waste.

The individual observed is a participant in this program.

Our records indicate that this individual had documented completion of 404 hours0.00468 days <br />0.112 hours <br />6.679894e-4 weeks <br />1.53722e-4 months <br /> of formal training in his training record at the time of the inspection much of which involved work in processing radiological waste.

The individual observed in the detailed on-the-job training was under the direction of the senior radiological waste plant operator.

In view of this

' deviation, the supervisor's records were checked to verify that the supervisor had received training in radioactive material shipments, radiological waste

?f

.s e

! z,9(

0 Mr. G. L. Madsen April 11, 1983 Page 4 processing, and radioactive material shipments.

The records show that the supervisor had completed this training prior to the date of the inspection.

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved l

The licensee agrees to continue to document training as indicated in the commitment in the statement of the deviation.

Corrective Action Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Deviations The licensee agrees to continue to document training as indicated in the commitment in the statement of the deviation.

The Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved The licensee is currently in full compliance.

If you have any questions in regard to th!s response, please contact ne or L. C. Lessor at the site.

Sincerely,

,0. WM b

. M. Pilant Director of Licens.ing and Quality Assurance JMP:JVS:KRW:cg I

1.

i I

e