ML20071J275
| ML20071J275 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 04/22/1982 |
| From: | Schroeder C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 3822N, NUDOCS 8204270192 | |
| Download: ML20071J275 (6) | |
Text
9
[c Commonwealth Edison
) Ons First NJtionIl Plua. Chic 1go, lihnois C 7 Addr;ss R: ply to: Post Offico Box 767
\\
/ Chicago. Illinois 60690 April 22, 1982 O
g A
b O
RECQygg Mr.
A. Schwencer, Chie f 12 4PR261 b
79 Licensing Branch #2 "N
Division o f Licensing 2
U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 s
Subject:
LaSalle County Station Units 1 & 2 Comments and Clarifications on Meeting Transcript, March 31, 1982 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 Reference (a):
Transcript, United States o f America Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Docket No s. 50-373 and 50-37 4, Room P-422, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, Bethesda, MD, Wednesday, Ma rch 31, 1982.
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
Commonwealth Edison Company has reviewed Reference (a).
This review provided three types of comments:
TYPO:
Misspelling.
CORRECTION:
Wording change to correct the transcript to what was actually said.
CLARIFICATION:
Wording change proposed by CECO to add clarity to what was said.
These comments are contained in Attachment A to this letter.
Commonwealth Edison Company believes that the transcript accurately represents our position on the allegations contained in the petition from the Attorney General of the State o f Illinois.
Where clarifications are listed in our comments, they are presented to remove any doubt as to our intent.
Commonwealth Edison does not intend to update this transcript in the future.
It is our intention to provide you with a final report in the near future which will summarize the results o f our review of damaged rebar cue to drilling or coring holes.
By copy of this letter, our comments are being transmitted to the At torney General of the State of Illinois and to Alderson Reporting, pl 8 2 0 4 27 0 lej(
bt
i-i i
f A. Schwencer April 22,1982 i
i j
If there are any further questions in this matter, please contact this office.
1 y --
Very truly yours, CWh 412,/s2.
C. W.
Schroeder j
Nuclear Licensing - Administrator 1m Attachment i
1 3
cc:
At torney. General, State o f IL Alderson Reporting NRC Resident Inspector - LSCS J
i t
i 3822N 1
i, t
E i
4 k
j l
1 1
4 f-
ATTACHMENT A
.Page Line Commen t 4
2 7
L. DelGeorge ( Typo) 2 13 V. Reklaitis ( Typo) 6 4
Lou DelGeorge.
( Ty po) 6 21 MR. REKLAITIS:
V. Reklaitis.
( Typ o) 9 3
DelGeorge.
( Ty po)-
10 9
floor should be roo f (Clarification) 10 25 Commonwealth should be County (Correction) 15 18 deficiency should be concern.
The review established that there was no deficiency 4
( Clari fica tio n) 16 13 measured should be mentioned (Correction) 18 25 MR. REKLAITIS:
( Typ o) 19 5
MR. REKLAITIS:
( Ty po) 20 11 Mr. De1 George ( Typo) 21 1
line should read " negative moment, bottom reinfor-cing carrying positive moment".
The insertion o f reinforcing provides technical accuracy
( Cla ri fica tion) 23 17 con trolled ( Typo) 23 23 line should read " evaluation o f all reported" The words " structural -- or" should be removed.
Inten t was to say reinforcement (see line 24)
( Cla rifica tion) 24 2
repaired should be impaired (Correction) 26 2
both should be _those (Correction) 26 14 ther should be there (Typo) 28 19 fromo should be from (Typo) 30 16 core should be cored ( Ty po) 30 17 drill should be drilled (Typo) 30 18 core should be cored (Typo)
n c.
'l
-2 Page Line Commen t 30 19-core should be cored (Typo)-
30 25 core should be cored (Typo) 31 2
core should be cored (Typo) 32 8
audited should be routed ( Co rrectio n) 32 9
auditing should be routing (Correction) 32 14 core hold should be cored hole
( Typ o) 32 24 audit should be routed (correction) 33 24 is should be has (Typo) 34 6
o f should be on (Typo) 35 7
core should be cored (Typo) 36 9
distress should be stress (Correction) reiforcing should be reinforcing ( Typ o) 36 19 reduction should be increase.
In this context, we are increasing the stress levels and/or reducing our i
acceptable levels.
(Clarification) 37 4
cord should be cared (Typo) 37 22-25 Change to read "could not tolerate any more bars being cut.
That did not occur until the latter stages o f drilling operations, primarily 1979 through 1981."
( Cla rifica tio n) 38 1, 2 Omit.
See p. 37 lines 22 through 25 (Clarification) 38 18 tewo should be two (Typo) 38 20 core should be quarter (Correction) 40 14 Add:
MR. LONGLAIS:
Speakers changed at this point (Correction) 41 7,8,9 Change to read " drawings on which we have marked the location of damaged rebar reports submitted due to the drilling operations and the assumed rebar damage locations due to the coring of mechanical equipment foundation antno r bolts. " ( Cla ri fica tio n) 41 16 Change to read " contacted in safety related areas o f Unit 1" (Clarification)
~
m r
, Page Line Commen t I
41 20 Change to read "MR. LONGLAIS:
Yes, that is for Unit
.t 1 sa fety-related area s"
( Clarification) 42 11-12 Replace with "recently plotted the core holes associated with the mechanical equipment foundation 4
anchor. bolts which are shown on Mechanical Drawings" (Clarification) 43 3
. drill should be drilled (Typo) 44 4
Change to read " span, in the top of two-way slabs, and in the middle span" (Clarification) 47 5
Change to read "and are in force prior to going into the drilling operations.
Du ring" (Clarification) 48 2
nipped should be nicked (Typo).
48 4
Change 4-A to 3-A (Correction) 48 14 Change to read "towards the latter part of 1977 or i
the early part" (Clarification) i 48 17 Change studying of to starting ( Correctio n) 48 19 poured should be cored (Typo) 53 17,18,19 Change to read "Mr.
Longlais :
To the extent of all reports received."
(Clarification) 53 24 in the house should be in our house (Typo) 53 25 Change to read " submitted to us are nothing more
(
than a copy o f previous documents received at l
Sargent & Lundy; - - we are going" (Clarification) i 54 4
Change to read "That is the review that is presently taking place.
The" (Clarification) 54 13 Change entire sets o f to RHS (Clarification) 54 16 Add:
No te:
A revised slide will be provided in the final report from Commonwealth Edison.
This is being revised based on the final review by Sa rgent and Lundy.
( Cla ri fica tio n) 55 20-22 Change to read "Mr.
Longlais:
These are the locations of reinforcing steel damaged due to drilling; these are the locations due to damage due to coring" (Clarification)
..e
Pye, -
Line Commen t 56 10 Change 1.33 to 3.33 (Clarification) 57 15 nick should be nicked (Typo) 60 20-22 Change to read "MR. REKLAITIS:
We had some expansion anchor holes in the containment wall.
There were no core holes through these walls.
They were for"
( Clarifica tio n) 61 1
MR. REKLAITIS:
( Ty po) 5 MR. REKLAITIS:
( Typo) 6 Change to read "did not compromise the boundary integrity o f the containment."
( Cla rifica tio n) 62 21 phalanges should be flanges (typo) 63 14 that should be there (Typo) 64 3
ware should be aware (Typo) 64 4
This statement was true at the date of this meeting.
Since then, as a result o f this review, it was determined that there were some discrepancies.
Therefore, this review and evaluation, though sub-stantially complete, is continuing.
We still are not aware that these reports represent any problems in this matter.
This matter was oiscussed with NRC personnel during their field review.
(Clarification) 64 14 LSC should be LSC E A ( Typo) 68 5
replacement should be displacement ( Ty po) l 68 12 Change the number to some ( Clarifica tio n) 69 7
required required should be required (Typo) 71 20 Change to read "each o f the concrete elements.
We have done a selected" (Clarification) 74 17-19 Change to read "MR REKLAITIS:
There are two cuts that were noted in the of f gas building and they were observed, and there are several nicks which are not detrimental.
There were no reported cuts in the roof reinforcing steel ( Cla ri fica tio n) 3822N t
i
-. -