ML20071H077
| ML20071H077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/20/1983 |
| From: | Wetterhahn M CONNER & WETTERHAHN, PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Brenner L, Cole R, Morris P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8305240489 | |
| Download: ML20071H077 (87) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_. O LAW OFFICES GONNER & WETTERHAHN. . . 1747 P E N N M Y LVA N I A AV E N U,E k MAun I E in IN %*AS !!!N OTO N. D C. :2 0 0 H O M E,H T M . RADEN INnN Q M. OLbON A RC H A. MOONF..JH :,- ',
'/
j HOS ENT H. PI' B L 07T,LL , o c. May 20, 198'31 b ,,,"' i f ,e ? 3 10petE Aoouss. AroMuw
\s ugC N/
Judge Lawrence Brenner Judge Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 Judge Peter A. Morris Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2) Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 Gentlemen: This letter is being submitted in response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's " Order Regarding Quality Assurance Documents" (May 13, 1983). Attachment 1 is a copy of NRC I&E Inspection Report No. 50-353/76-06, including the related Notice of Violation. Attachment 2 is Applicant's response thereto which is a letter from V. S. Boyer to J. P. O' Reilly dated December 15, 1976 with three attachments of which only the first is relevant to the macter raised by Mr. Romano. Attachment 3 is a December 29, 1976 letter from R. T. Carlson to V. S. Boyer acknowledging receipt of Mr. Boyer's December 15, 1976 letter. Counsel for the Staff has reviewed these three documents and agrees that they are accurate copies of the inspection report and letter sent by it and Mr. Boyer's letter received by it. G305240489 830520 ~ PDR ADOCK 05000352 G PDR r s
=
Judge Lawrence Brenner Judge Richard F. Cole Judge Peter A. " orris May 20, 1983 Page 2 The remainder of the attachments hereto (Nos. 4 - 9) are those dccuments which were made available to Mr. Romano in response to his informa_ discovery request. In accor-dance with my conversation with Mr. Romano yesterday, I am sending to him by Federal hpress a copy of this letter and actachments such that he may make any presentation to the Board that he desires regarding these documents. The remainder of this letter discusses how the documents made available to Mr. Romano demonstrate that all suspect welds, rather than those which were merely accessible, were rein-spected. Attachment 4 is a Philadelphia Electric Company Quality Assurance Finding Report No. N-093 which was issued to the 3echtel Power Corporation (October 27, 1976). This Finding naport is the method by which, inter alia, NRC items of noncompliance are entered into the quality assurance system of the Philadelphia Electric Company for followup and disposition. Page 2 of the finding report notes the issu-ance of Nonconformance Report No. ("NCR") 1980 which was utilized by Bechtel to disposition the specific welds which were found to be deficient by the NRC inspector. Bechtel NCR No. 1980 is provided as Attachment 5. PECO Quality Assurance Finding Report N-093 also requires a reinspection of all other accessible welds inspected by the particular Bechtel Quality Control Inspec-tor who accepted the deficient welds described in the subject NRC Inspection Report and NCR No. 1980. Bechtel Field Inspection Reports (sometimes referred to as "QCGl-1 Reports" after the form utilized) which have control Nos. C-63-7 through C-63-19, issued from October 26, 1976 through November 8, 1976, (Attachment 6) document the reinspection and disposition of welds examined in 1976 in rasponse to PECO finding report N-093 and which form the basis for Mr. Boyer's letter. Bechtel Field Inspection Reports Control Nos. C-63-20 and C-63-21, both dated January 17, 1977, (Attachment 7) document additional reinspection of welds which were subse-quently determined to have been possibly inspected by the particular Bechtel Quality Control Inspector involved. No unsatisfactory welds were found. Bechtel Field Inspection Report Control No. C-63-22 dated April 4, 1977 (Attachment 8), documents the comprehen-sive review conducted to determine which of the welds inspected by the particular Bechtel Quality control Inspec-tor were not accessible as a result of being embedded in i
I ' Judga Lawrenca Brcnnor Judge Richcrd F. Colo Judge Peter A. Morris May 20, 1983 Page 3 concrete and which of the welds not previously accessible, e . g._, due to construction scaffolding, were then sufficient-ly accessible for inspection. The results of this review are documented in Bechtel Field Inspection Report No. C-63-22. Page 8 of 8 is a summary correlation between the original Welding Inspection Plans in which the particular Quality Control Inspector par'icipated and the Field Inspection Reports which document the reinspection of the affected welds. Bechtel Field In-spection Reports Control Nos. C-63-24 through C-63-32 and C-41A-493 dated July 1, 1977 through July 6, 1977 (Attach-ment 9) document reinspections not previously performed because of accessibility problems in 1976. Field Inspection Reports Control Nos. C-63-30, C-63-31, C-63-32 and C-41A-493 describe reinspections of certain welds which were partially embedded in concrete. NCR-2710 which was generated as a result (not provided) demonstrates the acceptability of these welds. That nonconformance report documents that, for purposes of analysis, it was assumed that only the reinspected portions were sound and that the remaining embedded portion of the weld was nonexis-tent or failure of the entire weld was assumed . In all cases, the function of the structural member was not impaired. I would note that Field Inspection Report Control No. C-41A-493 which is similar to the other nine in this catego-ry was inadvertently not provided to Mr. Romano during discovery. If the Board has any questions concerning this matter, please let me know. Sincerely, I f . Mark J. Wetterhahn Counsel for the Applicant MJW:sdd Enclosures cc: Service List
p, /, 1 l c -il_
. (([gC'Ri\
x I t f:' h ,, ;? , --
/ Y& ,, A j /
,\ ^ % , , ,,? x s DOCKET tsu;;;;m
;,Tr0D.a CT!L Fqc g
. , ,~n 3D ATTACHfiENT 1
, Letter from R. T. Carlson to V. S. Boyer, dated 11/10/76, transmitting NRC IE Inspection Report No. 50-353/76-06 4
2-I V i l
- - . _ . . . . _ _ - _ . _ . _ . , _ _ . . . _ . . . _ , , . _ _ _ . . _ ~ , . _ . _ , _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ , _ , _ _ . , . . , _ _ _ , _ . - - . _ , _ . _ _
s CS
- f
, .,M e r ' '#* <,,
Ordlif o ST At t 3 f
..., :41 fCL E AR hEGtlLATORY CO '.**.'ISSI O N p.f.,. % *- rt onou e S . # 6 3 3 n. .s e .w t *atif
- <[,/ w.c o r es.w wea. ce r. v.. v u..s. n.ss
( :,
***** November 10, 1976 i
Philadc3phia Electric Conpany License ::o. C?PR-107 Attentict : : r. *.~. S. Boyer Inspection :*o. 76-06 Vice President Docket ::o. 50-253 l Engineering and Aesearch 2301 Market Stree: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Centlecen: This refers :o the iaspectica conducted by :*r. A. Toth of this of fice on October 16, 19-22, 1976 at the !.i'serick Cc era:ing Station of activities authorized by ::RC I.icense ::o. C?PR-107 and to the discussicas of cur findini;s held by ::r. Toth vich : r. J. Corcaran of your s:sif at the cenelusion of the inspection, and to a' subsequent telephone discussion between ::r. Tc:h and :*r. Corcoran on : over.ber 2,1976.
~
Areas era .ined during this inspection are described in the 0ffice of Inspection and Enfercenent Inspection Reper: which is encI sed with this letter. .ti:hin these areas, the inspection consisted of selective eye inations of precadures and ra; recentnti e records, interric ::: vi:h parsa.wl, :..aure._ sacs cal.a by the inspec:or, and observations oy tne inspector. Based on the results of this inspection, i: appears that certain of your activities vere r.:: conducted in full ec:.pliance with :.7.C requirc ents, as set forth in the ::ctice of Violation, enclosed *nerevi:h as Appendix A. These itens of nonco pliance have been cateccrized into the levels as describcd in our correspondcnce to you dated Dece=Ser 31,197 *.. This notice is sant to you pursuan to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the
- RC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title l'J, Code of Tederal Reculations.
Section 2.201 requires you to sub=ic to this of fice, within tecnty (20) days of your receipt of this notice, a vrf tten state:ent or explanation in reply includin:,: (1) corrective steps which have been taken by ycu and the results aahieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further ite=s of nonconpliance; and (3) the date when full compliancu will be achieved.
I a .
..l In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NP.C's " Rules of Practicc", Part 2, Title 13, code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this 1ctterIfand the this enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Docu=ent Roo=.
report cent Ins any information that you (or your contractor) believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you =ake a written application within 10 Cays to this office to withhold such inforr.ation from public disclosure. Any such application =ust be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the infor=ation, which identifics the docu=ent or part scuzht to be withheld, and which contains a state:ent of reasons which iddresses with specificity the itcas which will be considered by the Co==issi n as listed in subparagraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790. The infor:ati:n ought to be withhcid shall bc incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidseit. If we do not hear from you in this rer:rd within the specifice period, the report will be placed in the Public 2 ace =ent Roem. Should you have any questions concerning this inspectica, we will be pleased t; discuss then with you. Sincerely,
&s W~/S
/. Gau? -
Robert T. Carlson, Chief R. actor Construction and Engineering Support Branch
Enclosures:
- 1. Apperdix A, Notice of *.'iolation
- 2. lE Inspection Report No. 50-353/76-06 L
I d . I o License No. CPPR-177
?
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOL'sTIO_N_ Based on the results of the *.nC inspection conducted on October 16,19-22, 1976, it appears that certain of your activities were not condue:ed in full co=pliance uith conditions of your SRC Facility License No. CPPR-107 as indicated below. These iters are infractions. A. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion IX requires in part, " Measures
- shall be establisned to assure that special processes, includin welding, ...are controlicd and acennalished by qualified nersennel using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable cedes.
standards, specifications, criteria and other special require-cents." Contrary to the above, the established seasures were insuf ficicnt to assure that velding of structural stuel en Septc=her 22, 1976 was acco=plished in accordance with the sypticahic ATS-D.I.1. The fillet welds en structural steci ,besa c'onnecticas at elevatica 233, calcuna 23-C cnd d, did net sect the quality rcquirc cats of the AWS Structural Welding Code. - k*elding electrode holders were used attached to extension sticks which were not "desi:ned or manufactured so as to enable qualified welders. . .to attain the rest its prescribed" in the A%5 code, nor were procedures alternatively qualified to establish that acceptable weld quality could be attained with such sticks. Quality control surveillance inspections conducted and cocu=ented did not identify and effect correction of the condition. B. 10 CFR 50, Ap;cndix 3 Criterion X requires in part, "A progra:: for t inspection of activities sffectin: quality shall be established and i executed by or for the organization perfer=ing the activity ec verify confernance with the cccutonced instructiens...shall be performed for cach work operation where necessary to assure quality." Contrary to the above, the inspecticn of activitica during Octe*aer 1976 did not verify confor=ance with specification A-26 Revision 2 requirements for prcccction of eachined surf aces during sandblasting I and painting operations on the contain:ent donc, and such protection was not raintained and the nachined surfaces were inadvertantly painted and possibly sandblasted. t I t f { L
o . 1 1 C. Ir> Cr 50, App.:ndir. II, crite.cion V requites in part, "Ac t i .-it i es
.f fectins; quali:y shall be prescr' hoc by doen...:nted inst ructi.-nr. . .
a.d s:4.11 Le asconp113.;.ed in accordante eith these instrurtiens. ..' 1 Co..trdry to th: abm , ca Octcber 20, 1976 the doct. rent control rcT,2 re=ents, of j eu rule JR-G-3 .ere not impit=ented for desic:: decia.fonc to place holes in t:w tipp<_r flang;c cf structural steel beans a:. elevation 253 cf Ares is of the reactor building.
/
I - i
(__ e . 3E:I Form 12 (Jan 75) (P..a-) I t U. S.1.'JCLT.'s ul:C'JLiTO:'J CC:::: SSIO:: OrrICE OF I::3.':'CTIO:: A::D 1:: FC.iCO:E::T t RI:CIO:' I TI Inspection Rcrert ::o: Sn- 35 3 # 7A-.4 Docket f:o: 50-353 Licensec: Philadelphia Elect ric Cernany License !!o: CPPP.-117
-~
2301 Market Street . Priority: Philadelphia, Penn.sylvania 19101 A Ca t er,ory: _ Safeguards Location: Li=erick, ?cnnsylvania Type of Licensec: F/JR - 1065 '".?e (CT) Routi:*e, l'nanncunced Type of I:2.gcetioc: October 16, 10-22, 197/- Dates of Inspection:
" # I" '
Dates of Prevleus Inspection: e
/ #
A ~f // p gf Y ~ / U n/ P.cporting Inspecter: C' # ,![///, A. D. Toth, Leastor .nspector D/,Ti; Acconpanying Inspcetors: _
.N' enc ____
DATE DATE DATE II "* Other Acccmpanyin;; Personnel: Rev.*.cved Ey: / ' JWf [ _ R. Keinir,, Nting Chie'.~.' Construction Projects Scittion
// DATE[/f/ -
/ D/yIE F
.'esctor C ru.: t ien a::;;ineerin:. Su;: pert i: ranch
^^k= & -
s ..nn -- _ _ _ . - _ _ __ _ )
f? i e e i i SI"**ARY OF FINDINGS Enforcement Action Itens of Nnnco 911ance A. Infractions! (Details, isragraph 3) 76-06-01: Failure to Lie!d Structural Steel Per A*/S code 76-06-02: Failure to Inzpect Pre tuctive Covers of Containment Dere Flange Face During Cleaning /?pintin Activities 76-06-03: Failure to I=plerent Joo Rule .,-5 Recuire=ents. For Control of Design Caanges Licensee Action on Previous 1.- Identified Enfercement Itens I Not inspected. DesignChanced None identified. Unusual occurrences None reported. Other Signifiennt Findings A. Current Findines
.1. Acceptable Items The following ite=s were inspected with respect to those aspects described in the Details of this report. No decartures from regulatory recuirements or SAR cen=itzents ver. identified, subject to any specific exceptions which =ay be nor ad elsewhere under Enforcement Action or Current Findings of this report.
(Details, Paragraph 5. Subparagraphs as listed belev).
- a. Structural Steel Welding Ouality Records - Audits
- b. Contain ent Penetrations Records - Piping
- c. Structural Steel Welding Work decc itics
- d. Structural Steel Welding - Records
- e. Safety Related Jomponent Work Activities - Storage, Handling and Protection
- f. Reactor Building Reinforcing Steel Quality Control Insne:tien
- g. New On Site Vault For Documentation Storage j
i
r-
- 2. Enr5 solved itens d The following itens have been identified as unresolve .
(Details, Paragraph 4) 76-06-04: Implement Nonconformance Control System for Concrete Aggregate Material Receiving Determine Adequacy of concrete In Reactor Building 76-06-05: East k'all l Deternine Impicsentatien of the Monconformance Contro 76-06-06: System for the Structural Steel Vendor Identified l*nresolved Ittns B. Status cf Previousiv None inspected. C. Deviariens Nene identified. ysnece ent Inte rvi c.t as held at the site with the conclusion of the inspection a meet ng w i izations. Attendees At representatives of the licensee and centr. actor organre hir. blighted (i.e.*) The inspector at this meeting consisted of persennel whose nancs ai su==arized the purpose and the scepe of the inspec(as lis ted in the "Sunnary graph 2), and the results of the inspection cf Findings"). 11 information was i < In a Nove=ber 2,1976 telcphone conversation, i andcddit on. were cen=itments d cenclucions reached as provided by the licensee management representat veSrecifically cade which related to the infor:atien described in the Details of this report. di d rathermd the inspector anan audit that 76-06-06, the licensee a v se enced. unresolved item of structural steel nonconfor=ance control has coen I l l l
I it D ET?. II.S
- 1. _Persens Contacted PhiladcInhia Electric Cc-many
*J. M. Corcoran, Site Quality Assurance Engineer
*D. A. Marascio, quality Assurance Engineer
*J. T. Robb, Quality Assurance Engineer
*A. McLean, Construction Engine er - Civil W. T. Baxter, Quality Assurance Engineer
*J. W. Austin, Construction Engineer Bechtel Corocration
*J. R. Reincy, Jr. , Project Construction Manacer
*E. R. Elossin, Lead Site Quality Assurance T.ncineer
*A. G. Weednan, Freject Field Encincer
*R. G. French, Subcontract Engincer
*M. Bresm, Project yield Quality Centrol Engineer
*R. Ow, Quality Assurance Engineer L. Erown, Concrete Leh Cuality Centrol Supervisor
*K. Bishop, Q*olity Centrel Welding Ergineer R. Larley , Assistant Proj ect Fiel.' Ouality Centrol Engineer S. Su=r.ers, Quality Control Enginecc .Cadwelding D. Miller, quality Control Engineer .- Cadwelding J. Casparich, Qaality Control Engineer - Cadwelding V. Ferretti. Quality Control Engineer - Welding A. DiPietro Quality Control Engineer - Civil L. Brown, Quality Centrol Engineer - Civil P. Glanski, quality Centrol Engineer - Civil D. Kaas, Quality Control Engineer - Civil R. H. Pauza, quality Centrol Engineer - Receiving Inspection M. Greenidge, Area =1 Engineer - Construction Supervision J. Johanson. Area =1 Structural Engineer R. Merdell, Area al Robar Superintendent j' E. Icuan, Field Assistant - Area Otfice Stock Coordir.atot R. DeWitt, Construction Assistant - Weld Rod Room J. Windsor Area di Structural Steel i Rigging Superintendent R. Beech, Quality Control Decu=entation Coordinator R. Seisle, Foreman - Ironwork C. P. Auclair Welder IU-l J. Kier, Wclder IH-3 S. Olson, Cadwelder f M. Walsh, Cadwelder l
S. Bradburn, Material Superviser l R. Carlson. Assis tant "itorial Su,orvisor i S. W. Cearhart , A= sis tant Mat erial Supervf =or l
=-
- r. ,
4 = l 1 O. P., Cannon Cc ,anv E. Pokropski, Field Quality Control In.soector 1
- 2. Cencral I
A pre-inspection rectina was held on site on October 19,1976, with the ; senior licensae reorcsentative, to discuss the scope' of the ~ inspection, and verk progress or occurren:cs which r.sy hear upon the inspection. The status of previously identified ,unrecolved items , corrective actions or other outstanding items was discussed. The' inspector stated that the scone of the inspection would include observation of structural steel work in precress and associatcd records, review of contain:ent penetration records for centrol rod drive hydraulic lines, and general observatien of work.
/
The inspector stated that he had also been on site October 16,107A in conjunction with an inspection of RP'.* transport tests for license CPPR-la6, and at that time had observed cencrete curing activitics for the C?PP.-107 conta!=:ent dryvell vall. l l l I i l l- . l 4 1
~
m __ -- 1 1 k-
F' I l
- 3. Ite-s of *:om er11ance The following three items appeared to involve nerce=nliance with retulations of the Nuclear P.caulatory Cc=nissic.n er cenditions cf the applicable 5?C license. These itets are iniractions.
7 f- C A-Ol : Za52urs To *: eld Structural Stool Per At;% rodo During observation of weldinp of st;uctural steel at Area 13 elevatice 2S3,;the inspector obau ved that one steci floor Fes= pasr.cd clcse to colu n H at wall line 23. The clearance was such 'as to i!=it . access to the required fillet welds of angle clips to the beat end and the en.ed on vall No. 23. Interviews with craf t and supervision persennel revealed the plan to perforn the welding with the eiscerede holder fastened to the end of a bree: stick; the personnel stated, and licensee and centractor CA and QC rersennel 1cter confirned that this apprcach had been used en the similar licited access weld joints at elevation 253, colunns y and H at vall 23. The inspector determined that the weld procedure PI-A-Lh (Structural) 7.ev. O had net been qualified using electrode heicer extcasions, nor red the veld.'r b:en qualified usin; euch extenef ors. Altbouch the applicabic Ced: AWS DI-1-72 does not soecifically address the use' of elect; ode helder extensions with respect to procedure /wcider cualifi-cations. it does in Part 3.1.2 require that equipment be designed and
=anufactured so as to enable cualified wclders to attain the results prescribed in the AWS Code. The inspector considered that an electrede tcider attached to a stick did not rect this recuirc=ent unless provcn satisfactory by qualification test for rbe six different weld conficur-ations to be walded at the limited access joints. The licensee dis-agreed, and the insocetor requested that provisiens be =ade to permit his visual inspection of the limited access welds perforned at elevatien 253 en steel bes= piece numbers 23237. An elevater hoist and an insrec-tien cirror and light were cade available to the inspector. The welds were found to not cenply with the recuirccents of AWS-D-1-1 Sectica 3 "Workranship ," in that the welds were of unacceptable profile, cen-tained excessive undercut, and were incemplete at the upner end lover edge of the angle clip (root pass complete, only). For the veld joints designated n3 in the record drawing of the in-p*.ocess checklist, all inspection itens had been checked-off by the Sechtel cuality control inspector, including " Final Ouality Verification." The OC inspection apoarently did not comply with the requircnonts of AWS-D-1-1 Section 6
" Ins pec t ion." The inspector reviewed the following decumentation relative to the above item:
l QCIR-C- 201-W-1-5 Quality Control Inspectica nenert - E1253 C-41A-515-3 Vendor Drawin;: (Record Ccpy) Clevation 253 QC I R-C- 20 '.-W- 1-2 Ouality Control Inspec tion f.epert - E123 3 C-41A-657-3 Vendor Drawin;; (Record Cooy), Elevation 283 PI-A-1.h (Structural) Pev. O Weld Procedure Quality Control In-Ptocess Check-Of f ' Sheet - Welding, C-201-W-1-8. This ite= is a nonce:pliance with regard to 10 CFK $0 Arpendix B, Criterien IX require ents that special processes such as velding be controlled in accordance with applicable ccdes and standards. 76-06-02: .'e Failure To Inecct ?rotect (vo Covers of Contair est D0 0 Fla race nurinc Cle.nrinz Ointina Activitirs Durin,; observatica of storage conditiens of the centain ent do .e. the inspectcr observed wcr;;:en finishing the extcrior surface of tie done which had recently been painted. The inspector oi. served and inter-viewed the paintini; centractor quality control su ervisor at the work. The inspecter observed that, at several locatione, several featThe of protective tape had cene loose fron the :achined flange face. protective coating which had been on the face, aci covered by the tape, was also missinc; phenol base paint had been spraved on the cachined surface. It was not evident that the protcetive coatin::s had been removed by sandblasting or other operatiens. t*o to the time of these observations, the de=e inner surface had been sand! lasted and painted and the cuter surface had been sandblasted and painted. The job specification A-26 Revision 2 for Special Coatines requires to in part 9.9 that "Prefinished ite:as and adjacent surfaces not receive coatings shall be rasked and protected prior to surface preparation and durin;; all operations." This existuace hedmasking of the been inftape, tiallybut acco=plished as evidenced by the controls durin;; operations had apparently failed to caintain complianco. This is a noncompliance with regard to 10 CFR 50 Jopendix re, Criterion X requirements for examination of each work operation to assure quality. i l l i
r: , ] l i 1 7 A- 0(.- 0 3 FaiIure to fr,h 9t Job Rule C-5 Recuirerents For Control of Desi: n Chanje 4 i Durin;; r.enefal o'rwervation of structural steel erection vork 1:. the reacter buildin:t exterior to the contain ent vcssel, the inspector cbserved f r9nver; crs cut and rem hnics in thevor;=en The top flange of structural described these steel heans at elevaticn 253 in area 18. heles as beine fer the attach ent ei tennerary stccl cress hears as a construction aid to stabilize the floor for u5c as a 12ydern area for reinforcinr steel. The inspector e:mnined de si:;n drevices and found that the holes were not shown, nar- wcre chev simn on the record drawin;;s er othc: ise identified for the rescensibl.: cuali ty centrol inspectors. The inspector intervicued the ironverkers a:d forc=an, construction engineer, field enginner and cuality control engineers ani found that ua holes were-identified in a telerhene record in the constructica ent.ineers' files. There was ne Field Change Recuest (FCR), :!cncen:orrance herort C:CR) Design Chan;c ::otice (DC:!), or Field D6 sign ebew,e ;;otice (FT,C:;) available. ac cite job rule JR-t-5 recuires that design chance informatien or clarificatien in the fer: Of TW. er ether cerresprndence shall ' e handled in a specific =anner, including issuance of a field Design . Chant.e ::otice 'T"C::) , ref erence of the FPC:' on the appr:priarc. drawincs , and specific revious and apprevals. Failure to aspiv this cont:01 is a nonconpliance with regard to 10 CTR 50 Appendix 5 Criterien V re-quirements to i: ole =ent established ncasures for the cescrol of issuance
' of design doct=ents.
The inspector reviewed the following docu=cntation relative to the above iten: 1 C-201 Rev. Structural Steel Drawing QCIR-C-216-C63-2 Qualite Centrol Inspectica Report Telecon Record dated rebr<.at 6, 1976 l FI"-G-2 Rev. 3. PSF-G-2-1 Rev. O, JR-G-5 Rev.12: Project I l Procedures , i I
r-1 _ g-4 Unresolved Trens The following ite=s were identified by the inspector as unresolved items, subject to future inspection and excmination of supplemental informa tion. 76-n A-04: Inn 1rnent ?:ence.'f ar ance Co-trol Svstem f or Concrete M.irocate
1 t e r i a l Neelv ' n '
Durian I a walk-thrauch inspection at the on-cite concrete batch plant, the inspector observed aggregate fines on the surfcce of the coarse aggrecate pile in a= aunts -aich would normally be considered excessive. dovever, this batch plant has provisions to withdraw aggregate from the bottom of the conter of the pile, and to rescreen the a;gregate as it is transferred to weiching happers. The inspector laterviewed quality control personnel rceardin: effectiveness ef such rescreening. At this ti=c the inspector determined that en Septe=ber 27, 1976 the concret e batch plant quality control laboratery staff identifisd that coarse ar.7,rtgate received f rom the supplier contained excess fines o a degree such that cven af ter processing thrcuch the batch plant screens the naterial did net rcet gradatien specificatienc. Cencrete fer safety related structurcs was not produced in the hatch niant that day, and subsequent test records shewed that the gradation was corrected. Ilowever, no nonconfor=ance report was prepared, and the corrective action taken to segregate and dispositien the nonconforning =aterial was not documented. The inspector observed that the batch plant caterial receivinc inspection control recuire=ents are variable, in that the batch plant is used for production of concrete for both safety related and non-saf ety related s tructures at the site. In this particular case safety related structures were not involved and a nonco=pliance situation was avoided. However, the practice of not impiccenting the nonconformance control sys tem at the batch plant for safety related work is unresolved pending NRC further inspection of con-crete records. The licensee stated that a ceeting is scheduled on site the following week to determine a resolution of this. item. .
r 7(.-or.-Oi: f Tn Peactor l'utidf-~ Eaet *la' 1_ Ad. .ma c y of rencroto INternin During a walk-throur.h I:vpection at reactor hulldin:: ele:Stion 25 3 the insneetor observed a noncenfornance can nu .ber ::C?.-193". at the back up records shewed that cen rete cast wall. The asscelated '!J-23 and- 30 involved low 20 day cylir. der-placce:ent s nu .bar ' '.? The bre ak strengths for three cons :cutive test cyli:Ider cairs. 2cv str s.':th (1535 psi. 4825The 4770 psi) vas iden:ified in
.si NOR
- CR-182', on .Jul v 2t , lo76 was dispositioned "usc-as-is" on tlc b.si.s that "t he design Ic::d is not 0:pec:ed cn the above placenent for at least 90 days , at which tiev the!":veve cencra:a vill reach r.On the requir d co: pr ssive stren::th of 3000 rsi." the September 27, 1976 th*- field cuality contrel staf f found : hat required strencth had not been recchedviso;). af:(r f;] days (170'1staff he field si and 45'i4 ps! values for test cy!;nder pair tagned the plac rent uith ths c': served ::CR-IC34, whien 1 as been ref erred to the here of ~ ice cn:-ineers f or di:. position.
This Ita is unresalved pcndine, review of the final dispesition of this f re: , and the con:rn!s to assure folic..-up en :his tpe of use-as-iv dispesitien (i.e. predicated on asste ed .~uture action er occurrences). , 76-06-06: Determine innle rmratic . of r% ::encenfor ance Centrol Svetc= for thc Structural Stect Wehr D.:rf ng a valk-through inspectien of elevation 217 :he inspector observed that existing bolt heles had been elengted in a horizen:al directien, in the vcb of structural s tocl bean '.i-30 v.132-6, at coluen line T. The inerector discussed this itc= with *ronworkers i 'or pass-in the vicinity, who stated that r r.isting heles, desis 4.iches in through of reinforcing steel, could be elencated up directien the longitudinal direction only; this was based upen yet. from the construction snsineers. The inspector discusscd this itca with the respensible ernstructien 10) engineers and reviewed the applienble design drawing (C-Ic3 7,ey, and vender drawing (C46-273-3) . The design drawings sheredThe the cen-helet as clongated, but the vendor drawing showed no elonraties. :he vendor struction engineer stated that the field was cerrecting: There apparently error, as necessary, within li=its of the design. was no nonconfornance report arnlicable for this i ( . This itc= is unresolved pendinc further review of the controls for structural steel vendor nonconforcances. k
a a i In a telephone conversation on ::ovember 2,1976, the licensee advicdd the insrector that his site -rp staf f is ow en: aged in a survoi11ance audit of this i t e.t to ascertain whether the contrsetor's controls require i=provccent. 1 h l l l I i l t
r i
*:t
- 5. Accentable Trees The following ittes were examined by the ins;ectcr to ascertain inplenentation of the cuality assurance crecrun with respect to thene itens. The inspector did not identi f- any departuren frc=
regulatory requirements or PSAR con =itnents, <xcept as nay be specifically de. scribed in other paragraphs of this report and ref erenced in subparagraphs belev. i Structural Stcol Weldinc n u ality Fecerd< - Audits a. lhe inspector exanined the 5echtel audit schedule and t.co audit reports regarding audit of structural steel activities. The inspector also examined three audit repe rts prepared by the licensee's evn cuality assurance on-vite vtsif . regarding structural steel verk en the reactor buildinp and control roon. For the F.echtc1 audits, the innpcctor also exanined the backup checklists and field notes. The Ecchtel audit records included detailcd checklists, including separate veld observation checklists with acceptance criteria ~ and space for data. The records of both Ltchtel snd the licensee showed cranizance of applicable specificatiens, drawines, job rules, inspection quality centrol, and she. ed that work obser-v: tion, quality records review, and interv ev af personnel vere included. Audit findings were docu=ented in the prescribed cannt e and there was evidence of cananecent review. The insocetor exa=ined one audi t finding and observed that timely corrective action was docu=ented. The inspector exa:Ined the follering specific records: PEco Site Audit Reports C-59 (June 1975) C-79 (March 1976) C-82 (June 1976) Bechtel Project Audit Reports FFA-55, 18-6-1 (June 1975) PEA-81,18-6-2 (December 1975) Bechtel Finding Report AFR-C-047
- b. Centainment penetration Records - picie; The inspector exanined the survey recerds for the control red drive hydraulic line penetrations of the reactor containment
7 l 1 dryvell wall. O.e survey rt. rds showed that the pipe 1Ines f side of the wall, but did slo;vd to .f rair. Into the contain-ent not neet the 1/2 in h per icot slope srecified en the CIN.I desi;;n drawing. licserer. a nene,niornance repict had bcon prepared ard hcd be(n acc..rtel dispasiti.med by the Ens:ineer-coastruccar as use-as-is an t: e aasis t!.at ach penet rat iaa slaps- exceeded the mini u: 1/3 inch per foot specified un the NS3S supplier's desit;n 8ravi n;;. The inspector exanined the followin;; specific documents: CMI Drawin;; :~a. 70-7199 a7 3 Rev. 6 70-7199; i Dimensional ins 6ction Reports, File 7-2-1,' Contract Index *13 dated *sy 19, 1976 Eccuest for Appr: val of Eeviation: RAD-C-8; PJ.D-C-12. Specification @31-C-2.'
- c. Structural ete : ".'e dine
- c rk Ac tivf ties The inspecter crre-red strecural st-1 velding activities
~
. elds inat eleva:. ion 223 si area 13 of the. reacter buildici;.
progress consf *ted of fillet welds on angle clips cennectinr, three floor be s to e. beds in the vest wall of the buildin:. Each connectirn included tvc clips, each of which was welded to the web of the bes: and to the embed. The insocetor observed joint preparatim and align = tnt and welding progress. The welded connections were identificd on quality control inspection re::rd drawin::s and checklis ts. The records did net identify each veld, but rather tiic connection number In-:*rece which s inspectien/ included two angle clips and four volds. surveillance cherklists indicated that fit-up, joint c1 caning, proper veld caterial, weather protection, and final cuality verification vere among the items which were Theinspected for ench inspector observed connection and vere found satisfactory. base =ctal cles::ine and joint preparation to be as required in the applicable specification. The licensee stated that con-sideration was :eing given to =cre specifically identify each
~
weld of each connection, on the in-process checkoff shects. The inspector otserved that connleted velds met the flaw final profile. reautce-size, length, u=f formity and lack of undercut anri l eents of the applicable construction cede (A'.3 Dl.1) and veld procedure (p -A *.h-Structural) . IIe observed that velders renoved and avoided slag at veld 1,esd tie-in and between veld passes i are strikes cn adjacer.: hae netal. t I i I
r ,
?
I
- 1 3-The inspector interviewed the weldinc auality control ens:ic.eer (GCE) ;:nd examined his records of welder cualification ano in-procet.n inop-ctions. The QCE statcd that in addition to other observktienn, he also randecly checks electrical paraneters.
The Ir.spector also insrected the weld red issuance trailer and rod issue records for the days of welding observation. " eld rods wbre identificd and stered in calibrated rod ovens. Attcndants interviewed stated that they checked returned- rod for defects in flux coating, burnt tips and any general da are. Da:.a ed red segrega ted f ron the oven s tr Je was obaerved as evid<rce of this ins;xction. The inspector checked the veld rod isuuo record for the observed weld joints and verified that t he issued red was as called for by precedure and was in fact in use by t he volder. No uncontrolled filler ta*erial was .nserved in the welding areas. Thei inspettor alre observed various structural steel columns where fit-;p for velding or where velding hcd been ec=plete. Lase metal weld greeves vere. ebserved where paint had not been appliud in crder to facilitate joint treparation, a=d run-off plater were installed to ensure sound groeve wcld ternination. The inspector interviewed a weldinc forc=an, who expressed aware ens of pre-heat and weather orotection reautre ents,
- d. Strurtural Steel Veldine - Records -
The f ar.pector examined the records associated with the welding activitics he observed during this insccetion. These included recorde, for hoan ccnnections nunhered 1, 2 and 3 at the reactor l building area 13 cast wall at elevatien 283. Record drawines,
- inst ctica reports, in process surveillance checklists, persenrol qualif
- caticns, and veld rod issue forms were examined, and no discr.nancies fren NRC requirecents or SAR cc==it=ents wcre
! identified, other than the iten of nonce:pliance (1 en 76-06-nl of this repert) associated with limited access welding. The folle.Inc records were exacined: , QCIR-C-204-U-I-2 QC Inspectien.Renort Record Drawing (layout) C-2n4 Rev. 3 C-193 Rev. 3 Record Drawing (connection details) C-4* A-f.57-3 Vendor Print (layout) C-204-W-1-2 Weld OC In-Process Checkof f Sheet WR-NC-2 (10-19-76) Filler Metal Withdrawal Authori:ation(s) ( GWS-Structural, Rev. 1 General Welding Standard l PI-A-Lh (Structural) Rev 0 Welding Procedure Specification i l
i l ,1 Werk Act !vi ties - Storace, '!a~!1f nc
- c. Sa_fety Rel. ecd Co soncnt and Prorcetfen (1) The >torage, handling and protection of safety related cor penents at the ADWIN warci.cuse were inspectW spainst The techanical the applicabic canuf acturer's specifications.
co:penents selectcd verc: Recirculation Puno (S 32-CC01) Recirculation Systen Cate Valve (B 32-Fn23) Core Sprav Pump (E 21-C001) Jet Punp .\ssenblies (3-il-D213) The inspector exacined the storare and t:sincenance file for each conponent and deternined the necessary storar.e requirenents. The inspector then exanined the r.tcrace condit tens for each cc=nonent, verf f ying such things as in place; he also space heaters energizcd and devic: ant inspectcd the cleanliness and rreservation conditien of each ceaponent. The "Insulari:n p.esistance Test .n Report" also for the recirculatica systen gate valve no or vos reviewed. The in.srector intervicued 'the Material Suoetvisor. PC Enginect and other personnel recpensible for sur.eillance durinc storage. The general program for nainten ::ce during, storage was discussed and several outstanding raintenance tic pcrsonnel action cards were reviewed by the inspector. interviewed appeared knouledr.cchie of the ce=puter system for contro111og natntenance actica and vere fanfliar with specific maintenance and surveillanco requirements for tbc components examined. No discrepancies were noted. (2) Storare cenditions of the following electrical cenponents were also examired: Recirculation Punn Motor (B 32-C001A) Recirculation System SC Set (B 32-5001) RhR Punp Motor (E ll-C002A)- The inspector exanined the storace and caintenance file for cach co=ponent and determined the storage requircrents. The inspector then veritied compenent storage conditions, exanining such things as space heaters being energi cd and
>=-=mww - =U
r- , E [ , equipment proper oil levels where applicable. The "Insu-lation U.sistance Testing Report" for each correncnt was reviewed. The megner in use at Advin had a proper cali-bration sticker. The calibration record dated .iune 17, 1976'vas also reviewed. No discrepancies vere noted. (3) The inspector observed general storace conditiens of =ost safety related corpenents at the ADU15 varehouse. During the inspection, the inspector noted vareno':<c personnel changing the desiccant in the follcuing centrol red drive assemblies: Serial F6238, 6547, 7337 and 6741. Handling of the components during desiccant replacceent appeared to be with due care to prevent danage.
- f. Reactor Euildin- Pcinforcine Stoc1 'ualit Centrol Inesect!cn During ja valk-through inspection of elevatten 217 of th> reactor buildipg, the inspector observed ir.:c-ier vall ferning and rein-forcing steci erection nearly cc plet for vall nunter 31. The inancdtor observed n9 vertical reinforcin: s teel bars lapsed a dis'tance of 3-fect, with seven bars in a plane across the 13 inch channel in the !!-cole =n number F/24.5. Rebar. clearance did not eppent sufficient to permit fler cf the usual 3/4 inch apprt ate concrete nix into the channel, and did not meet the mini =un 1 inch specified in applicable AC1 codes. The inspecter dis-cussed this iten with the responsible cuality control enpir.ecrs (QCE), and the Field Engineers, noting that concrcre voids had previously occurred at a similar colurn at a lever elevatten of the facility. The QCE's stated that they had not yet inspected this area, and norcally defer such inspections until work progresses to the point that reinforcin; steel is tied-eff and i generally fixed in place and reviewed by the responsible field i engineer. The OCE's subsequently inspected this area and orceared an in-process rework notice for this and other items they found.
The QCE's denenstrated awareness of governing ACI recuirenents and applicable job specifications. The inspector exanined the l' following docu=ents relative to this ites: Drawings: C-701 Rev. 7, C-712 Rev. 5, C-121 Rev. 6 C-601 Rev. 18, C-123 Rev. 5, C-127 Rev. 6 l In-Process Revork Notice: dated 10/22/76 l Field Change Requests: FCR-1834 FCR-817, FCR-834 l l l I i 1 1 l
, _ s ._ _ 4 l
r
- g. ':ev On Site Vanir Fcr necune_nt..r f on (;t erne-The inspec:or perf or c3 a walk-thrcuch inspection of t!.e ac.cly constructed quality reccrds vault on r.ite. The vault it. larrer than the previous vault and has shcli s; ace fer ra lfographs and all other <S records. A tempera ture on.1 hu:-idity centrol syston is provided, and a halon f f re pro:ccr lea r.ysten i.s installed with auto atic door clesure installa:f en in err;;rsss. A count er/
gate area access ir provided and service versenr.el in strendance. The facility appe srs to provide c:any of t t'e features recct menus d in /GSI : 4.2-9, snich the records supervis.:r stated was used I by Bechtel as a guide. t I e e 1 Abt 8 1 .Mh bum i en m a , - -.- - . . . , . b s
ATTACHMENT 2 Letter from V. S. Boyer to J. P. O'Reilly, dated 12/15/76
6 PHILAC ELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY a v:,n <t s nzz-
= w : L;. ; E L ? w ; /.. ::. '9 0,:
"!s64*45::
V s.00 YEA
..e s .ea s e s =* n
~3-n Mr. Ja=es P. O'Reilly, Ciree cr United States Nuclear Regulatory C::=ission Office of Inspection and Inforce=en:, Fegion :
631 Park Avenue ' King of Prussia, Pa. 19'36
Subject:
CINRO II:I Le:ter dated Nove=her 10, 1976 Ke: Site :spection of Cctober 16, 19-22, 1976
- spection Reper: Sc. 50-353/76-06 Li erick Generating S:a:ica - 7:i: 2 File: QUAL i-2-2-2 (76-06)
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
We offer the f:11eving responses :o the subj ec t letter regarding 1:e=s iden:ified durfag the N2C visit to Limerick Generating Station - !:i: 2 on Cc::ber 16, 19-22, 1976 for inspec:icn of cons: ucti = activities auchorized by NRC License No. CPPR-107. Attachment I - Eespo se to Ites A of Appendix A of subject letter. Attachcen: II - Kesponse to Ite: 3 of Appendix A ci subject letter. Attachment !!! - Respo=s2 to Ite= C of Appendix A of subjec: letter. The due da:e for this response was e:: tended to Dece=ber 15, 1976 in a telecon wi:5 your s:aff os Dece=ber 2, 1976. Should you have any questions cc=cerning :hese ite=s, we would be pleased to discuss them with yeu. Sincerely,
~
, .A,, ' c./ , .,-:_-s.
-~
Attachments
1 ATTACHMENT 3 Letter from Robert T. Carlson to V. S. Boyer dated 12/29/76 i
'fNITED STt.YE s NUCLEAR REGUL/.TCRY CO *.*;SSIO N RE: eon I ist eaa s A .E % vt
.m.o on .. .ssia. .sw sve, a . a se4oe
~ ~ ~ ~'-%
Oe :ence r 2 ? , 17 6,.. %
. i Philadelphia Elec:ri: Campany , Li:ense 50. CFP2-lC7 Mr. '.*. S . Saye r Inspecti:n No. 76-06 A ,
A::en:icn:
" lice Presiden: .
f Decke: Nn. 50-253 - h, Engineering s Resear:h \_ 2331 Marke: 5:ree: Philadelphia, Pennsyl ania I?!G1
Reference:
nur le::cr dated e:e bar 15, 1976
- n response es zur l=::ar dated Navc:ber 10, I??6 I
Gen:.kerea: Thank you for Laf::-.ing us o f :ne carrac:ive and preventive acti:ns you d::::en:ed in resp.'nse :: :ur c:rrespondence. These actions
.v.li .e exanised durin; a su:sequen: inspec:ian of y ur licensef pre;ra=.
On Oe e:Ser 20, UT6, !r. A. !::h f this Office and .M r. J. C:rcoran af y:ur s 2ff discussed 0:c.er s:eps taken :: avef d fur:her ir m cf nen::::liance of :he :yre discussed in A::achnen: ;I of**y -he ur a'steps covetaken referanced :2:::r. '.?a unders-- d --at, in ddd--~a regarding :ne can:si=en i: e, ::her st.bcon:rac:Or-furnisn:d ite=s are also en:ered ints :he project s:orage maintenance progrs= when
- hese are erec:ed Or placed in their desi;na:ed *.aca:icns in the plan:. Fur:her, we unders:and tha: the storage -ain:enance pre;ran
~
pr:vides cleanliness pre:ection and inspec:Lon unich will assure pro:ce: ion against sand *olas:ing/ spray-pain:ing effects. is If Scr understanding of these addi:ional corrective =easures no: cerrec:, please advise as accordingly. Yeur :: opera: ion vi:h us is appreciated. Sincerely,
.s v , .
/> ' ~ --
Rober: T. Carlson. Chief Reacter Cons:ruction and Engineering Support 3 ranch [,,c *"C+ ,%
% ',M .e .T rw / um% ) :~
s % %r
~ z r,.
,* p
%'V e s a. ..g6 l
l
l j ATTACHMENT I Resoonse :s : : c r. A of A a m e n f i:' 2 Deficienc-
"10 C7R 50, Appendix 3, criterion II requires in part,
" Measures shall be es:ablished to assure tha t- special processes, including welding, ... are controlled and acco=plished by qualified personnel using ualified precedure in accordance with applicable ccdes, stancards, specifica: ions, criteria and o:her special require =en:s."
Con:rary to the abeve, the es:ablished seas'ures were insufficient to assure that welding of strue: ural steel on Sep e=ber 22, 1976 was accomplished in accordance wi:h :he applicable AWS-3.1.1. The fille: welds on structural steel bea= cennections 2: eleva: ion 253, colu=ns 23-G and E, did no: cee: :he quality require =en:s of :he AWS Strue: ural Welding Cede.
,I We.iding electrode holders were used attached to ex:ensic a t i : *< = vhich were not " designed or =anufac:ured so as to enable qualified welders ... to attain the results pre-scribed" in the AWS cede, nor were procedures alternative 1v qualified to establish that acceptable weld quali:y could be a::ained with such sticks. Quality con:rol surveillance inspections cenducted and docunented did n:t identify and effect correction of the c o nd i t io.. . "
"Although the applicable Code AWS D1-1-72 foes no: specifically address the use of electrode holder extensions with resp ec t to procedure / welder qualifications, it does in Part 2.1.2 require that equip =ent be designed and nan:factured so as to enable qualified welders to attain the results prescribed in the AWS Code."
Reseense
- 1. The following corrective =easures have been taken:
- a. The fillet welds on structural s:e el b e,e=
connections at elevation 233, c olu=n s 23-G l and E, have been repaired. i
- b. The inspecter, who originally accep ted these two welds, is no longer e= ployed by the con-tractor and a reinsp ec tica o f al'. o the r wo rk i
l
- a*
323/e,:s .:
= ,fj L
. . f 2 - perforned by hi= has been a:::np*'shed, where . accessitie. f approxinately II' . elds re-a a ,e..a+.
<..pec.e., ...
.a e.s. . .. . ..e.. =. . . . e. :- ....
. . . . 2.
.s
.o..e.a.e
- .. ... a .. .. .. . as , c. _
e ... . . , . . .. . . . . .
- 2. Actiob. :aken :o ,reven: recurrence:
- a. A training class was condue:ed 0:::ber Of, 1976 for re-indoctrina: ion and re-rrien:a:1:n in the var,ous . aspec:s o.a acceptance ::. :enp. e:e .
c vo r.r. , reviewing of inspection criteria, and :he respen-
- s s. u. < l i . a..es o:. ... e l .a s... .. . <.s.e..
. . . . , .... .s. 1, . . . c. a.a..
l field welding personnel were re aired := a::end
,i :his training class.
w
. u ec. e....o-.u_ e _ o . a . 2 .. , - e. v. . 4 , o. . ..a
.. a P.o4 .
. issued prohibiting the use of unauthori:ed extensions.
- c. ffec:ive Dece=ber 16, 19 6 all velds hz:
require :he use of veld ex:ensi:ns shai he identified and approved by the lead weld engineer. s),/~~,' -:_~a.
- l. .
A.. - I
u I Attach =ent !! Response te I:en I :f 1.e e e n d i n A reft:1en:r 1 10C7?.50, Appendix 3, Cri:eri:n :" requires cality in part. "A prorra= shall be
- hat inspection of activities affecting established and executed by er for the :rganization perfer=ing the ac:ivi:y to verify conf:::ance vi'h the docu=en:ed instructions . . .
shall be parfor=ed f:: each vork eperation where necessary :o assure quality". f a::iviites during Contrary to :he abcve, the inspec: ion s October 1976 did to: verify cc=f ormance vith fpecifica ion A-26, Revision 2 requirements fo: p rote:: ion of nachined surfaces during sandblas:ing and pain:i g operaci: s en
- he containment dome, and suchinadver protecti:: 'vaspainted an:17 ne: =aintained and and the =achined surfaces vare i possibly sandblasted.
*ese:nse steps which have been :. ken and resui:s i
- 1. Corrective achieved:
- a. The deficiency was documented by 3echtel NCR 41981 dated October 22, 1976.
- b. The exposed surfaces of both the Unit di and Uni: d2 dryvell heads were inspected by 3echtel cuality
' Control with the fellowing findings:
- 1. No evidence of surface da= age due to sand-blasting or rus:.
- 2. Por: ions of both surfaces show evidence of dry overspray of Amercoa: 90.
- c. As coating of bo:h dryvell heads is co=plete, they will be placed into project storage maintenance program.
2. Corrective steps take: :o avoid f t :her ite=s of nonco=pliance : A periodic inspection of the machi=ed surf aces of the dry-the projec:'s well heads has been inc=rporatedThe is:oac: ion card was entered storage =aintenance program. 353/76-06 ATT II/1
l Att -hees: !!! Reseense :3 :er C of .ierendix A efi:ie-:y . 1:CTR51 Appendix E, criterion *.* req uir e s in part. "A::1vities quality sha*1 he prescribed by d: ucented instructiens affecting 1:strue:icas . . . and shal*. be acco:plished in accordance with these C :::ary :s the abeve, on October 20. 1776 the decu=en: no: i=plemen:ed for con:::1 desian require decisions =ents of jch :heles
- s place le JR-C-3 werein the upper fla:ge of s::uctural steel hea:s s: ela:::lon 253 of Area 13 of the reactor building.
2ee : st
- 1. Cor e::1ve steps which have been :aken and .resui:s achiaved:
- a. : CN *:2. 2 :: Revisto: 10 of drsving 3031-C-200 issued c::eber 26, 1976 au:h:ri:es :he drillina f heles in
- he ::; flange of beans at Eleva:ien temp 233'-0" in the
- ary : ears.
Reae::r ~.uilding in c dar to sepper DCN No. 1 =c Revision 13 cf drawing 8031-C-193 issued Neve:ber 2', 1976 au:horizes. == a generi: basis in 5. the drilling the Reae:or Sufiding &cd Cen:::1 Roo= Area, cf holes 1: the top flange of bea=s and girder in c de: 1 te suppc te=porary bea=s.
- c. project Cuality Controi :nst; ction 8031/C-2.10, Revision has incorporated a task to inspect for the re : val of te=porary bea=s, if installed, and tha:
the per:ane:: beams uere no: da=sged.
- d. This activity was app;cved by ?:oject Engineering via a telephone discussion with the ?esider: Enginear, Ecu- and a telece: canorandu: was prepared on February 6.
ever, ec ::ary to projec: precedures, no 7CR vas issued c: change to the appli:able design documun:
=ade as reqeired for =odifica:icn of a q-listed cc=po=ent, A review has been made of ce=s::uction sc:1ons which have resulted fro = =clephor.e conversations (te7econs) be: vee:
- he Residen: Engineer and pr: ject Enginee"ing, and frc
**here necesstry, FCRs Residen: E=giner Memoranda.
have been initiated :o revise :he design documents. 353/75-06 ATT III/1 l
4 4
- 2. Correc:1re steps :sken to avoid further items of n:ncen;11an:e:
- a. e
. . . ...ee....
.... ..e ...e
. . . . . a.. I .. s....c.
. . .. . . . . . ..., r. ?. ...,1, ,ss,e.s
- e ver.b e r .., 19'6, recuires a documented retiev f
?esiden- I.zineer :'e-oranda by ?re'e:: Enrineerina ::
e.sure :?a- an . ne c e s s a ry *!*;
- s '7C ? 's a re i d e..t i f i e and; issued.
a e
- n. Oe . A e s:31*O 90 1
f.. T6 T. T.
d into :his progra: en Dece:ber 1, 1976. : spection a: three-=.onth intervals is scheduled. I
- A procedure for appli:ati:n of a new rus: preten:ive
. a t c ... ,a ., .....
. , , . se ,.......s...c.2 .,...
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . e.. .....a.....
. ece e.. --, .
- 2. . . . .. e .- . _ , . . , . _ . . ...e..s.a.....
equ,.e.e...
.. .. . . s .e ,z ~, c :- s. . a.,.... . .....
. . . . . . , .,_...a.
.. .e .
present preservative and eve rsp ray vill :: he :::ple:ed until June 1, 1977. Over :Fis six nen:h period, s:orare of the dryvell heads in : heir present s:a:e vill net jeopardi:e :he quali:y of :he =achined surfaces. t l t i a
/
/
4 e 353/76-06 A.. 7. .M m
ATTACHMENT 4 Philadelphia Electric Company Quality Assurance Finding Report No. N-093, dated 10/27/76
D
\- ... , A A ty' 0 .5/73
- stet . er 3
' " ' " "3 FINDING REPORT "f Linerick Units 1 5 2 G[42. .D. ItPE:
["" O 6:.:if e **
' C ::;nvE ttu%:1 G EdC NPC ,yne, ! :viun ansvaaset, O s:R C ::zt.I:Tn! A:T :9 ;E:'c. 3, Sechtel Power Co p.
3 I:cm of Nonce:pliance e ner c:=;a.:r: C.K. Seppet - Project Mana23; 4 7.ITI: N E3
- 2. ISSUED T0 e. : D1 - - ' '
a"" "e -*
' ' - 4 T.0RGANIZATION Sechtel Power Corporation ',o;yg,l' #
s.THOSE CONTACTED T. Alton - K. Bishop tjEC 10 I:iG s.10 CFR 50. APPENDl! 5 ORITERIA p , A, '.".d.W.' *. se. FINDING (usE AND REFERENCE AC:lf!3NAL SHEETS As RECUlRED) Two welds from the beam to the clip on be2=s 23237 and 23239 in uni: 2 on . Elev. 257 were both incocolete and unaccectable and were made with the did' ' ' of a broom stick handle aitached to -he sh'in;er" o reach the joint to be welded; which is contrary to ANS section 3 1.2. Furth6r, inspec ion surveillance records' indicated that thes'e. beam -
' ~
donnections were inspected. . , f t.D I SCUSSION (usE ann RErEnENcE AcsiTioNAL saEEis as REcuiREn> Bechtel issued NCR No.1980 identifying the non-confoming condition. l u.RECCMMENDAT10N (us! ANo aEFERENCE ADDITl:NAL SHEETS As REQUIRED) et cA stristuct :nts A. Both Inspector 10/27/76 ,,N ,, 033 ,,y, ,, ,,206
! .s. IDENTIFIED TITLE CATE ,, , es g i ?' NAME
- stasnutica IDENTIFIED NAuE TITLE D ATE A. Teller - TLC l
Site QAE 10/29/76 P.L. Sauk - - - issu!D sv 2 4N wwE 8W-w m TITLE DafE IbD*b 34
/ et v.
=ar-a l /. , sa. s er
(
e- _. p
,j: .t :n 2.st s sy g, , ,, 3
,,. .... . n-o92 Q}Y.p[?~
4 .# FINDING RE.00RT k'2EE6Er:ckunits1s2 ] [JEC 10 E'75 no "ano ! enun u:aus:: is. CCRRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO F 10LVE FINDING { N M [ u" ",", N ';, , n,. , ,, . 3
- 1. Issuance of NCR 1950 to a: knowledge the nonconforming c:n'dition and to acquire dispositioning to correct sa:e.
- 2. A Reinspection of all other work perfe red by the particular inspector who accepted the welds in question was accomplished wherever accessible. s l
/. f)ffsd n S m a'AtL /950 - tr/ti/7f -
2.lWN& $l N" W$c-4.%7i
'^ #
$. # ^ l
(- AcTicN TuEN n - - /4n 7f.,cTics vEnirituY4fLf x - MA /d c
.c
.n nu ,,n un !?;g a
- n. CORRECTIVE ACTION TAXEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE "" ' " ' " " " " "
sesittenat sursts u agevlars) A training class was held 10-25-76 for re-indoctrination and re-orientation in the various aspects of ace ept ance of ce=pleted work, reviewing or inspection criteria and ultimate responsibilities for weld inspections with all personnel in attendance from both the QC and field welding groups. fCAA h/0ML S -/b/ lb Z $9 .ff.St Id/W ()W W lh/%g7*.4fr7ie/-. &WW1/5S 0 5
/s ACTION TuEN SY /!"2 7*7I-- Acil3N VERIF, ED/Y .' n. P.E. ACCEPTANCE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION pf
' N2 REIOLVE, FINDING dA'%$ 4.,
@ UN c:EPTABLE (SEE SHEET 3 DF 3) a L.,, ,, ,, Q ithd "'*
un a mn..., o E uNnL ,umucN NT "" [
~.
t i..~ r 1 a;
.r.v..,t,17$ _.
r E i, u 4 ( e U-003 18
//;,
~ ~ .
. ,.........*.y w. I I e.
i* .. \. e m I'.m *s =e I
.T - . 6e 4 'J . H .w .;..6 .}p
, q. ,' . . ...... t 4 . ,e T 4 p 4 y,.1. u ._ ...
-., : . n u -g Cf ! ::4u n us;is.st v.
'".~.s. 'hM t.1
[ N .. v *a.
,. ~
u/.'!! / .'. t s:(ri ss.'2,; % . : ;,<*4. I
- . . .J
- r. :, O N U,i. vu:.r:-:
-. ., : . n:: ..: itrrit :: .:: n:: it utc::
- s w
t u . ,e
.h,v
. r.'!//, ,.,3
. . J,y. " i t.* ! \ . U~ ':he ERC fi:::lin.g. 4h.t pne ateh'his N"l2, asEr'eplie? . o
- 1. *be 3ECEi's*ED . . i reference to fur'5a- --
~'s by 3scht'el ?:-er Cois. .'. .. M !
- --~ Oj Z R'3 ,. --- -
.. C.l.- . .
- 2. T..is CR should refle:- th::e fu-ther co # tten .s refef:nici 'in h.r.e -b P., eve.
7.. . .s.. _. s .u-2*daEfy Mc d.:.eum.cd/ as/ eerfci;/lc wA)c4 47.&h.zfe-: q wc.'s': M& ecyan: y ,. , ,,, ,p p c y c,,p ,,,; , l n w/ Je i % ;t,y,;.y 4 , vy 9 y ' 4 & W = t % .
- = s= t.=.kiaes , c%
. ty
. .= . .
is;n ; s . v-m ++ wMM
.(, ; . - .
n.v. mr. / n.t. Ns
. ...t o ut t . esit j
ri. REYlSED CD?.RECTIVE ACil0N cu:t a== irrticiet ac:ni:an sacris as <<:uitro) ,
.[. ~' .# ?Q{-2t.6 Aated 12-17-76 states that any veld thati requires the use of weld -
extension Sc1ders' vill be identified anii appioved by. the Lead Staff Field , Weld'ing Engineer prior to trse. -
. . This'requirenant is being incorporated in' the latest revision of Jnb Rule G-16 " Weld; Lng.
. ~.
l
,e -. .
l
~
.... . . . .j]' . -
'E '! 3 - ACllCN 1 0:*
acts:n tattw i. -
. e J.R.Reiney ,t- dr. f :s' =4= **" .
( i. P.E. ..,., . tr.- , . e . Of :
..V1.s :. ,
- t. n. r. n t i g .: .. - .-u:,. . gvn .. .,
L 3 ,tmm ,mm: __ _a n.m r i.n . m .n om s .s -
.. : smi 3 - cr n .
j p y g, gg, _ 5.y. _ o in ... , , . . m . m .,,,,
... ~- + - , , , . .
-7 ....
i.... . . .. (. . -
- .- . - - - - . . *=--. - -
ATTACHMENT 5 Bechtel Nonconformance Report No. 1980, dated 10/22/76 t l l
. . ".s N
.s.
i i
- c. , ,I~
i i I.<. i s. s d, i
< i .
' N
,9
! t T1
' NT
- N 'i 6 1 F_D ; : d I. 1'9 :s a 14 b' i' : a i4 g k@ 4 $:
i O Z W;4 1 U%$$ T 8 3
' /'[. @t . ji ' -: 'I -
Mi. y l 21 t ' j _ i s s % D, @;j is
! E!_ ! v l'd
= 1.4 . x, 1, , ,
Yv y 2! 'l Nv, Q,i, . i ! - d a b -
, m
- : : . ,; N,,aesV.
m s-- w l 9J ,iy , tM, 3 g- _. ! v.,l f
} 5 Yi $ E wp. i i.j v.-cQu 0- %
c" . :-z e nW c- = e
% N. w w < i <9g I h,. z i .: c;:Jg: i gc RI.q- q (1,k i -
g, e' s . ! , ii
- 5 91 ,'pA[.i: - :
i ( I N -
=
ch hi.! ' : l d:i t WN.A '%(, e q
.t
\9 tg M c- d g~ %l s ir :
s . 4' s I k s (yh s Jv i
- i
'5 ,d .O'.$ W
- O IQ 'D 5 e l%
i i ! E es -- ' s a hg y-
- 5 Q N f
tl
%l
=-
- *i V i
.i Q- '=
.6 =
2 .3'Em oq g l\ g:P q-i*
.J. m!s\ C0 3
M.&j ' s .> 5
\i s -,. b R l 4 ( li a'f sa
's. .ji N.* k D @Q :: e>% '3 I k
"$'o<judid! ! N k MEk k gbgk N @d 't!$kk kl : !!
W :' p : 1.N ! ip!
=
- 3. nji EW x-WN g e
s o
)>
o al y %e% .o 4 i i i l.
/
ip !.:19 i ! 1 de g h,( . s w). Y ff Bi g4 . l' bl 92d !h ug- 0 l37 w Ea
~
5 y
;a: s s - hg 4 i
dh,ggi -
~
s it - [q . f \ z !
- 8. I ~%.
22 P[: N
)
k hs k i 1b k'! y v i
. f (E
s <
. i !
~
i ! di !6 d b k ! )@W $ G' d !
- SQ i@di
$' : x;s ti'{
1 " A N( N
- i s"i s j slein!b tu e ~j ) g
' M' y - s.o .
j
.s s. .
to 0 > 9, 'sx u I a Q: 1 y% : : (a .c o 3g Q g 9 D Ns ,N mM 9 i
!c - i :o i g : c N to, < '1 =
g h q i- = 9 - 4
- z l83B 3 l 7, l5 h $N ? y, ! g $E
, k Eg ~r 's:(SU@ .n (
- j. g e eu v-. v: .
- g
( =~ ~ ~ 4 t ) g %(o T g tj e$ 4 2 a g:
...m.c. /l O/ .;.G! ?q fa i ;
A
&syf
- - n B
'Q k C h <; 3 14 r.f' :.g
~
$ V 2 e Qg $.g.
NJ 4 eq Q k g h i2 z 9 3
% (<
g y' , e
\
1
-'e e os s& s = =
, N z
o z o gD og l i tu rr e e i-
- g
(
- .... iG : "q ~
3"
~
a w
. 'G 0 .1 u, 3 ;
i is b-j F g N g . w f7 3
f*:-lEN'.
. !. k. =!.b b
_Ih a h, o b 9!
% 6 $b s)e$! a 0
1 !. . h= i.
. , g.
.- w.
I" ! ! ! o
. s (3 9 d
=
0 3 !
=.
k '% k!p ! 4 = . . = e _2,. ;- s .[s
i I: y c O I k 3 6 4 W I Y Nh' % X ' i i,4 8 s \0 e
! cq - D k ?r a% % T n
- s g% .
$p y gvyq. 'q ,
4 m ea ,, hsy) N i . r, .d , k. m .d YUS g sos s s
\',
ts t w. \' / .. / \
,,s..'
i h /a k Q F.. ). ' e s? L' qk\ y E 2i T 'q n,Q =l p S > o % \ % Yi A A h f r
\. f (g fi
', k * {l.. e a ; 8 P;
b U
.5
- l
- N d
1
\
9 : y .j l )$ 5 E
~ i lih s (6 410y- ,
E4 4 0D\ ' 63 s hc 93 S; 0 h 51R N
%, jc28,0 3 * ^J i i k
1 ! 2i s\ t g\ a<a,s< e l e: % d d C y
/
a)!$f t ~ o 2 6 3" y Q 9 b=- f g
! t ) Q If-@o s3$ad1 c:
9 aa 41411 s rg 5 8 kL 4 h
- z. I Q@p i l y
S - t o N Q<\ h i D it A / ,' # hhQ Q k VJ' s
\
).,J.
6 if ll h , l s, g o .- '
^d -
p.fd: p- -/bT k t d i c1 . , a; fV y li7 /ll QN n d?
*d 0 e U '=1,, ;-
l ($x % Na p> D },A 3%:h r g , ' .& ~...
% ,')'
4]asIg a ug 0n y9 '. * . . '.
% T A ! .T o J J R
> k;_\N \ $t' s q d 1
ai a Yh $ Al < ~ 0 lO
's fg l $
A
......YU '
( M I
% j i
.y, Y.
O'h h a : v f : 5 L
' j l 13 0 -
tif, d) 1 I. -
; =-
O S - j
.a ]1 l _' i a
~ i !
l M ! i d
- T '
l N h V l i T i N ' ! qs tii ? h- , l
$ 2 -
I mM, n D $. N '\g l g N' u h 4 t' 2 , -
*\ j w nc :0 -1 O e t
4 4 P ! c 3 O E
~
I f. C:
- go E D 2r a N t
d< a9 O d d .T~ o I- O G4 e - i i i- 0 -@ 71 J g ' I tA i z eu 2 < d ; o{ P. 2:'w N 0N
$ a l l' yN N g
]n!. g o j L
,h \ .
l i 5 9 N[ IT %, I
@ f., -
@/ O d C
m $ ~%H-. ' f! (byg i O w 3 _ ll s e
- 2 [- l
! \ !
j-el- hi w i I 4, e 7 i i i 1- 4 i
\' !
h u 01 > d i . z
- c. I + >
+ b J 3
l o1 I e' o U4 I@ - ' l 2 O z i e , o s-- e
, c i
- i 5
8 2 i
+,
u e 22 o I <M 'I @L *i 2 I W t--c.y'I 2 l 3 $; ti 2"
" g" '? G $ l y V I
'l 2 oli di d*9 '
h 1 19 e 5 S y u 2
$ai ia &( lr
( ! e 4' N~ a a W g . . ib ! U @d M
! E .
i
) G Ej ci . ! ;
10 jo3i i a e 1 Oj d 4 d. g- j ; s j
;* i i '9
~' q d tr .: i !
,1 i -di 1J
' Qt *;
j i j j (
., l ! ?g W_. -
. 3:
*6 : . f l
i! j i
%:A ,
' 4 l' j i
j' G; 3'l~; i I ! i___________ , _ l_i _ -I - ll'*:
ee ** W e
- De 4 ge ee a e% mge e p e@G ese @
I ' ' 01j . p. c < s D)o lI . - N( lh .
!- gW M i
! 'l d ,'
.: .I' uws :
=) s a e.3 Il' 4
y
~ .
I'< 4 i
.h
~ . .. l l b \s !
i l-ti s' - D' ' ', k i vL ti Mm ,
?'r ht.
Nl
\ :
Q l' l l
-J
"{ N : ==::
D
.E
)*se.
h, Z j lN} 9si iT c, o sk. kh
'.i- A>
t ?:
...2 ,
t.Et m+ . , l
. . o .- I ; I -
S' l .
$! \g l
~ .! '
. O! ! l 1
@ . ' i .,',
- C' pl (N' I w! s b l or GN -3
-.-h i ,
*Z N' ,
'y . 6 l ,.
h, % k I= j 7 f o-Y k V,
@i;. d ;D t ' '
o i . ~ ( f. Zj ,$ - D -h 4 '
-. . N, !
- w. -\ 4
; I ,
l . l $9khE , W.
~~
I NN&=f, Q
~
Q $ $ lb - k L f , wa-
, 4W .
#a % I l
~
i % t
%
- h l .
1
% i .
} Qi .Q % N l
~
4! s 8 . ( ,
. ]
k.--) 8 .
> l j
!o
,\ o .I i I l ,
1 l
.e i
4 ATTACHMENT 6 Bechtel Field Inspection Report (QCGl-1 Report) Control Numbers C 7, dated 10/26/76 C 8,-dated 10/27/76 C 9, dated 10/28/76 i C-63-10, dated 10/28/76 C-63-il, dated 10/29/76
~~
C-63-12. dated 11/1/76
- C-63-13, dated 10/29/76 C-63-14, dated 11/2/76 '
C-63-15, dated 11/1/76 C-63-16, dated 11/1/76
- C-63-17, dated 11/2/76 C-63-18, dated 11/8/76 C-63-19, dated 11/4/76 l
\ .c e i
. - _ . _ _. . _ - . - . . . . - _ . _ ~ . - _ . _ _ . . _
~ ,._ .._.._-.. _. _ __. __ _ _ _ --, . ... . _
3 RECORD CONTHOL
,2 FIEl.D INSPECTION REPORT
, ,, : r - CcNTROL NO. d*N'7
, rete NO -R'-/- 4 % ~
- 1. PciOJECT NO. T.c 3 /. 2 C ATE _4 0./_Adj.2_f"* PACE OF
- 4. tTEM SNSPECTEO To TA l. O f ~7*^J_Wa r e fron Cf ll/ : /.s3 < A r e e:JA /Lic/// A e al T'N'E f o L.L e f.ts>A) C C.C.T '7' N < /EC ?> o N / !J M . c s q q- ly j . y i O/92 f.2/ / = ? C '2. 0 / W/ ~ 7 C 'E Qf__y/ /= / Q l
~
1 S / o a i "
.- S. LOCATION A AA C 70lf "1 fl. V *2 S *T I A JPf4 13 .J. / _7 4
- 6. TYPE OF ens?EcisoN \// % () A_L 4 A sig psy g sn At g /,
- 7. STANDARD s CODE i PROCEDURE / OR AWING i SPECIFICATION T =
A I4' S A/ / 72 M/_- 7 3
~
82 ) 44 SO G~~1o C 9/ /</C'3!,b-7h='** W G 1/o c G 2 -/ 4 D A -r /- e:-: m- FA/1 . c to 9 w-s - L,. G I' V 2. (Ab/ - 9 C 'L e h (,4, L/ ~) O 1o/ W-/- I c N C A* /9 ?c _
- 8. INSPECTION ECUIPMENT USEO 8 / t.- l # 7- t/,/ 4"/M t'" M6 s
4
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY O
.f .10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISF ACTORY a '1 . SA E6' - LA l.c/srr/c us
~
i NoN~ ' A7ecew/es.rm . 4&a s ded-
~
Oc;'*G/ - / 0,.Cf We s. C-6a.7 dergo /c -z 7- 7c., no C-b ~;T- / W.ctpc //- 2 '% . Vir>DGk At~*0 f~i' L dt~ -. r v4/a e-7. ew - Jee N_,Eer 0-6.3-22 e c'ey::;c V-s- h~ drMghi.~2.i'-)
; O .reunon:
f i
'Y - ' '" ' '
n,.....,, id . ,' b. it. eNciNeER j_ _[f/ D. ..... i
.i . . .. .-
- 3. RECORD CONTROL
, ,, : '3 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
.' - CONTROL NO- g'f,- ._g
,yetE NO. 5' / W ?:4_ -
- 1. PROJECT NO. T0.3 / - -
2 c4rE _ /_o22 > / 7c._ PAGE OF
- 4. l TEM INSPECTED .'I"O TAl-
$f-TN $l.fC Y/Q)J ^A IWfl Af A l' C 0 N 91 / < // F
'7'WF fo LLQ WJN r 0.t 'T nN "T*ALSffC7Lcp C /99 W > - tJ C 20/ W / .7 ./_kA.N { . C /9 7 G(_ / '<
02 c) / !/./ / - 9
/ C' 2 0 / -- ll./ ) - / Q
- 5. LOCATION k YA C YO/f N"L A l f> '2 O A J?A' /1 / 9' /- / (J
- 6. TYPE OF 1NSPECTION W/ $ fl Al- t
-i-A/N FN $ / A N/]/
a _ __ 1
- 7. STANDARO i CODE i PROCEDUR' / DRAW PECIFICATION 4 WS, 81- # 7 % 8-_L _7 3 /F 2 . > <s C C 1-) ADD T l- Yb2 W 0 1l0 C 192. W i- 9 C 9 /,/ x fo /o- D r :..< u e- 194 Us /- 11 .
& ac/ tt/1- 7 e ' r e) ful. 0 h1 c A 19 90 O 20/ tt/ / - / o
- 8. If4SPECTION EQUIPMENT USED J~/ t L A""r /1./ #(, d (* Ac# -
l l t
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY C l
l 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY l -
/
NDY6'~ .' SdA AC4* dA//t'A3WM ka7.#de) s ?/ d e=t-Ys M 4.2D
/
t h. ".fe=c?-/'s45" A76.50 %$~d d' & C 6 /-/ h&W //f24 C*6 :T ~? WA'h*d so -2 4-?4 A/JD 0 6.S'// dr.2.7<*/J } AMD R/ b2*AJr.fc*c7 /cd - Je*<* k e' & ,d f d - 6 3 - 2 2 /datra / ] 6 . O / -d.t. k X . y s ?? W~.2f- D l Oistribution: WNie - OC Files JPO ' bb 7-25-11 Canary - Originato'
,,,,,,.n,
[L ./ 11. ENGlNE ER j ' / [/M'6
,f
,, na L ,
, d p CC" Y *g
..,o.. ,
3 WECORD CO.YTROL s FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
. . . ,, , e
, CONTROL No. c 9.3.q .
FILE NO flCld,'O.'I
- 1. PROJECT NO N 03/ 2.DATE J R /'7- 7C PAGE OF l
, 1. lTEM nNSPECTEO 9~0 7*t? 1. Af- fuiffc 7/o n n# IL-ft n C s1 t~t* s L4 /L is /// is e Al l 7~//f /~, L L c r.4 /N n _O . e . _-r* 1*n < /Fe & st //3p< ,
c /99 12 s - / L Q t 79 fu/-/7 C / 9 <~ lis I . / 'I
/ / /
S. LOCATION A S A C ~Y 0 A A 50 l/ 2 I l AA 2D /7 11 l l l l
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION fll $ //A$. l 0 INFAl M fA N d! l l
l l A T 7.STAP QuQ /fCNE c& / PROCEDURE s DRAWING / SPECIFICATION # f. 74 #1-5 av--.<p;., ,; , . A . /- / . 7 2. ia Y/<o~ .
"P u C h,/(* 11 / 0 7./n & C 2- ) B Mn T / -dr* L'/ t
/~ k9 (1/ .$JT c/o r t.t.//-/ , S /= <? ID I - / 7__
//YN/98c _
- 8. lNSPECTION EQUIPMENT USEO /C /L-L. K ~T~ (1./ WLid C, M,M I
l l
. 1
! 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY O UNSATISFACTORY 7 l l
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY N C IE IT9I V/ A < (I E Al B A S pf 7 f /f ju f* ~7" O l l
U N A C C K/ 7"D 15 /. /* IJ.,s & L/Js o e 1) dWMA oA C.c.7 j?. c 199 W I. / I l A/o 72 - FeA $e' .s~.- AAs'Pfer w u:r 4?eeo.us//swd..& as OT 0d 6 /-/ 8r */e!L ?~ W O6 3 - 2 2 g;7'.R ,JPe?' d T ,7?, Q g & 'g__ 7-2f-)? -. l l [ Ostf ril)WlH3n: 08 u,. a.n, Y~ "9 "
- d -
. 11. ENGIN EER ./ 6,4,,fi_
- d p u. 30 "C C "' "
3 RECORD CiJNTROL
. _ . FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CONTHOL NO c, .c3., g 3- .
FILE NO. Ill' / ?*! A * ^ 1 PPOJECT NO. S O 3./ 2. D ATE dM2_9'/7N . PAGE OF
- 4. lTEM INSPECTEO ~'~o 7~A L ff - DLS /Ec 7'on i of Luft.s r s:Te c o g sr_ i s gf,r47 cN "I"l/F fo b L. <? !///At t' O.C ~1' -Wnc. 7/qn !?f__p s . C 197 91 ) 1. ) O C /9 7 W /- 9 A c 19 7 tM 1- it -
l '
- s. LOCATION AfA C YO $ $ FL t1 Q/2 A ff) // jr ,L fp
- 6. TYPE OF lNSPECTION JJ s UA L + D fp in < it] 19 4_L l
r
- 7. STAND AR D i COA
- 4*"CC ' P90CEDURE / DR AWING f SP ECIFICATICN ,_,,f,jv_f f) ./- / 7 'T 8. /. 7 7 #2. J &
(* fo
- 3 f.; ~. r 7 s 4e u.
O ?//P lV O ?./o e C ?-/ D A D 7' /- + /s22 N 1 C /9 7 tis l- I n c /9 > ts /. 9 A k' t ? ? W -/-J/ hr c A / G q'O l
- 8. INSPECTION EQUIPMENT USED [/ 6 6 # 7" 11/E rf Q,QA- q
- 9. R ESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISF ACTORY UNSATISFACTORY C
- 10. ACTIO!4 TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY l A
/Vd7f* VDL
$8 TA.1.5*/ G d 7/'d/ds' kl'<~6A//d4dAff,A 8dd &
- \ $~e=p Eps'od'7 W063 ~2 z si'd.+s ;Gs~- 2^2 Orsf w 2 2-)
{ ! Oistributen: A ! White - OC Files Canary - Originator
- 11. ENGINEER //
/ , / @
o,...,,, - l 7 L . . . - - - . . - .
6I 4 l p wG (,,,cc . M I 3 RECORD CONTROL j FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
...'.v 4
. : ,.- ,, , i ' i's CcNTROL NO.C-G3-1I
, s. . 4 j FILE NOR !- 6 3 - W t 1. PRO. LECT NO Sd 3./ 2. D ATE _2CI3 G'/2 d . PAGE OF
.s LTE*A tNSPECTEO 10D?l. J?$__ T A/ sad *C(/0N-- 0US/. D3. A C ?_C}/)L/.$1/fr) 0N-
'7"t/p f~c &J_o wie e, q?f ? 7~ ^.*9 y e ric y / L 4.sig .
C / 9 <~ LV / - / / C' /94sf J./C Q/94_p J-/7 C/94 fu /-/ T s - s s
- 5. LOCATION 0FAC YaA El U T of A$fA // / <~ & /C
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION 1/ / UA/ 4 f) / N # A) $ /A A A.f
- 7. STANDARO / COC E, PROCEDURE / CR A'.a.'ING i SP EC:F6 CATION M < A /- /- 7 ~2 /7/ . 73 12 2 7 f./
C 9//C W C7-7 /O C_f T // Annr 1 - <~ CA! d 57 r 19 c tu l- // ( /94* W /-) C Q /?u ou /- / 2 e s9a W J - / <r A/GA M 80
- 8. INSPECTION EOuiPVENT USED ,# / 2 I- /~ T L4' A"4 d d /7 d #
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY C UNSATISFACTORY M
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISF ACTORv A/ r /9 -TMC W#< d # 5/ >= //1e '7#4 6 el#
YO U h) k (* [. $ $ 'f" A 13 !,, $ IN$ &8 ?. ( /~) // WA$A O A$ Q _C.. /. A C / 9 ;" iff 1 - // A YOM~ SUA Y A.__ W 2_l"Y~/O d3__ k. f(o_4rf &V Qf M Aff? A__W GC6/V' 00/M7- W cs.5- 7 z d rr? w +f6 - 9 '? Q f $ f ] ,.. L ' o .2. E n Oistrit>ution: wnite - oC Fii . 4 l Canary - Originator Q / // / - 7C. 11. ENGINEER p_ ((/,/j~ M
- sia a m .
- / ,
ac.c <
. .. u . . . . .. ,
.- p- y-l 3 r;tcor.o cournot l
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT oost,c,,o c.c3.i2. l i
=
ruteno M H t-A -13 I
- 1. F:OJECT NO. TC 3 / 2.DATE // // / 7 6 PA G E OF a.l TEM INSPECTED hA A ")'JM S f Y A A $ $ C T/ a Al OC WP"L A C uf C C es. d AL/ < l} fn o a 7dr re t.-i.ou n a e, 0cT Tn <Ane rien At, an s .
c2oi ly / - M* e 10 t/ tu /- t I - < l
- 5. t.CC ATICN l? A~A C 70 A 1 E L ts '2. $ 3 J 9_ 93 AAAA /3+/u
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTICN f/ / 5 ce 4 L 4 /7 / N EA/ c//1 A/ 4 l
~
T. STAND ARD / CCC E / PRO CEC URE / C R A WING / SPECIFICATIO N A #/ 5 8 /* / ~1_7. # # v / ~7 3 ##v2 7u l C 9/ IP r v _c ets c :/o e t; 3 /?co / Annir l - c , PA '2 C 20l IV / - A~ C 'Z. 0 (J ED /- 2 NCA 19CO
- 8. INSPECTICN ECUIPMENT USEO 8/l-L'87~ f/> #Lp cad #
lI
! 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTCRY UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTCRY i
A/evW ' f e,d' Ef Z~/AS/ed 7/a<ls' A1ccow.#fs as./e6 -Af r. .:se
%.1d* '2'~ G C 6/-/ Nc7# as sf* e s. G-63 2.7 st'm es, :7- /- ? 7 AtAW 1
0- AT- 29 c.fe/> 7-/- 27. & & % r'!k & 4-22-)? _A ff,so Jpc= /e/s27 W C-t,3 2 z .fs W 6 /-s n ' l-a,-- o C* - *= d j gf. f, g g 11. ENGINER - /4
' /
_ , . , _ . . , _ - , . ~ , _ . L o
U . .a ) ' .. h, *[ gW 6 3 RECOAO CONT .0L m (Q:m FIELD INSPECTION REPORT cest,ctso c. c,3. i 3 rets uo. _ rre /.r'4.3 -f a
- s. PROJECT NO. S03/ 2. D A TE / d /7 9/ ~/ 6 PAGE CF 4.lTEMINSPECTED lAATJAl l?f ~ Y^l $ $ff. Y/0 N OP bs FL n e A C C cat /C/$ftw 0N _ 7%f f i:~n LLn usi n t: C. r* . Y ~T*N < D ?r*floAf' AbdNn.
C /9 s f// /- d (S / G t./ ll.// - <~ C' / 9 "4 l4 / - / d
/ / /
5.LCCATICN OfAC Tod d #/ U ToI AAFA //; I 2- h/f
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTICN VI.S fl A l-- */ 0 /JIl #^2 G/ ANAL
- 7. STA NDA R D / C C C E / coCCECURE/ CRAWING / SPECIFICATICN. A fl. " S O l* /- 7 2 /? El/ /- ? I ll5~V 2 ~J 1.J c* ThPF7/ C 11 / 0 5/o c' C 3 /?ful A /1 11/ 7 / - ~;~ ft]"2 C# /? S~ W /- (~ C /?tJ Us)A~~, C' 19 3 W1-/o AJCdE. 1 (~'O S. INSPECTICN ECUIP'. TENT USED I/6 l- E 7" Il/ CLd 646#
- 9. RESULTS CF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY O l 10. ACTICN TAKENIF UNS AilSFACTCRY
/ >
//dYs" ~ SL /Cho 4LrArr7/s<6* A% o.u/ww.o /24 50 Ud2=~~ 06 6 /-/' /OA'w7~ Mks, d- 63 2 d e%?mo ~7-S~ ??
.cAlD G o r -p ~? s f c ,- M W.s'-7?aJA?.e4 & 7 - 2. .?- p ,
A ld*e $ d* ~Z* AA 1/sc 7 sM As/pdf- $ fe .3 -2 c., da 7 b) 2 .S'- ) ) a t:n, & s.* - 7-2.S h kf. ~%9 be~ZA)S//c'T/OAJ ke'/dA7 8 ~fs 3 - t 7. da Ye's8 4/-2.-7) %'?/ God k :' - 1 '
~1 G ) 1 on jf C:,-% - gcQ
- fo.43.x i s. ENGiNeEn
,, /,/d e s ~
L m._..,,,~......,, /
- , . .!, J -
a Mi.V:n C ,:.r y y # 'q e # h
- 3. HECCRO CCNTROL ,
j . FIELD INSPECTION REPORT cest,ceso c.c3.w 'i * l 'i FILE No I*PC
- f ' (' 6 3 * //
; 1. F ACJ ECT NO. SO3/ 2. D ATE // /1/7d PAGE CF l 'k' 4.lTEMINSPECTED & YAl SY = ~? hl 5 lN /'/ A b1 nf ON ~7'//F f~n L t o Ib/A) r,
[ufL A A l' d n :u f L / < llEn
- d. t . "f. ~f M S A fcf/n M 01' A Al I
t' '2 e l (f./ 1. / 6 . 'l
/
5.LOCATICN kEJ3 C. YO A 5 '2. 'CLU '2. < 1 13 A M A /7 l t S.TYFE CF INSPECTION LI / $ C/ Al- + fi 1 Al G At < 10 N A L
- 7. STANCAR O / CCCE/ PROCEDUR E/ ORAWING / SPECIFICATION A lu C O/-/ ") 2 8Sv "f 7 7 I?FJ/ * - 'J U C ?/ A FL/ G lu o. 1/c ' C G 's f?#L/I
. AD Dr 7 f - C ,. f*/9 .2 e '2 c / w t-Jo At c # 19 90
- 8. INSPECTION ECUIP'. TENT USED #~/ 4 4' E /' fb82 A qJSM
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY Y UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTION TAKENIF UNSATISFACTORY
~~~
N ?~d'~.
- J- n A l#d' L// Ocis* T A2 d /e=c 7' / M 23 N r~d</A U SA6O*
,4 /J6 J e ? "~ O/Md'7 A&S, GC 6 / - / C 63 ^) Wure D Je -? b-?&
A7AfD d - 6.3 .Y _ f W ar ;r e-v.) s'd - 2 ? 7 6. U /'fM!< ! k 7-2 P-77. Atde f~c4 $c~ - TAAs E&'c 7o^' 1*- d.e<> .0/d 57 # 0'b 3 2 '2- W4W 2/d 7 ~) \ ;!-/ f & S '7- 1 1- 7 -) o~ n E~-oD Q d' p //. 7, g i t. ENGINEER 4I1_/ [ , r.,c.oi. . - . ni o- . .. . i. ( )
-w.v vuy?
ff 3 RECORb CONTRCL
,A FIELD INSPECTION REPORT ccur,cusa c.c.3-is gi?.J',
vtLE No. ~ k . * . l' _'. ] . s -
- 1. PROJECT NO. SO3/ 2. CATE 8!/N 6 PAGE OF
- 4. ITEM INSPECTED '9"O I'A l- hf~ l'A C AFC Yl0 N 6/ EU EFA14 A C CCid /} G/<//F'9 0 AJ 7///~ 4 L &o ti.< >Al t: 0. C. T YAr s dre rio At D G A AF <
A /Cf T lL/ / - / /+ e'
- 3. LOCATION Af ff f f o A Eb V T/7 AAAA /% + / 7 J
r o
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTION Il l < f> 10 l- & A/MCN$/4NAL
- 7. STANDARO / CCO E / PROCEDUR E / CRAWING / SPECIFICATION O /* 4 A / - / - 7 Z- 8#92 7 .3
$f!/ '1 - 2 44 <* 9//C (W Q ot/0 CC3 A Gts I s2 8 A s r / < EA "A O /99 $1/ / ~ / U b) C jf 1990
- 3. INSPECTION ECUIPMENT USED N/ l- 6* # 7 fu #z id 6 A e A-
- 9. RESU:.TS CF INSPECTION: SATISFACTCRY UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTICN TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY A9Mo 6DC6/-r Er'./s' L7 # G-6-r-2z /'xye41 4 - c - 9 7 s.S ns 4 { w 7 '-6-71 N~ 1/_ , g .- h ; o J. , ., c, 11. ENGINEER l0 - L/---
c.c 4 . . . a n , -- ~, . ~ . . . . ,. L
gV
~' '
CW
- , t ,..] p 3 AECCAD CCNTRCL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT ccyr,ca,a c.c 3 .i c, nuzna I(C /-C 23 '?
- 1. P A OJECT NO. SO3/ 2. C ATE //// / ~? 6 PAGE CF 4.lTEMINSPECTED ./]IA 7"/13 /- Af- DI S /f t*No N Of IMSL A $ 4 C c o s? ll / T//f g CN T'c/F fo 6 L o ifs /N c, Oc t 7~>> s D A~c /T c n / bat a s C L/1 A // C tl./ /- I c' i o 2 u, / - f c' 17 3 (L/ / - U a
i d
- 5. LOCATION A AA C YO A Y El f/ lTO 4 1/ ') blfA / s~,1C 411
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTICN Ut < OAL + DINMN4tANAL
- 7. STAND AR D / COCE/ PROCEDUR E / C AAWING / SPEC:FICATION A l// f O /- / 7 2 /2#l/ /* 7 3
/?ffs 1. ) 4 C 9/ /? f V /* fi/ 0 L /en ; <' C 3 P f'/ / A nn i 7' / r** FA M C 43 /14 // C Lts /- / $ /9 7 W/- C <* 19 7 U/ l - 4 h1 C A (990
- 8. INSPECTION ECU:PVENT USED #/ 6 Z- #7" W 8 4 ef Cd0#
-f
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTCRY UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY A/pr~f~.' FoA Yf~X.C/.r/ecm?.<21 >Gce t.uptsss."/> - Auo & cski~
0 CG/-/ fp/cA7
- C 4/ /A - </9-T h 4s ? ? 7, d 63.J/
dctf.-:0 ? d - 7'?. sn A>D 0-63-32 t/Qno/) '7-S 7 2. &bSu k ? - % 7- Y AND 2 oPo tr d 0 6 2 - 2 t .da n-o </'-s ? h
///_ 8?d,p //. y . i f_ 1. ENGINEER / # 4 u:4 .. - ..n,
. ~ .. n I .
m __
CN '> NEf* O COPY n r- aM wo _c' P G# cF# v nv D V-
! 4 l
I '
""g .
- 3. RECCRO CONTEL
, FIELD INSPECTION REPORT ces1,ctsa. c.c,3 - n
@_Q, r,tsno #c./ M 3 1
,! % ?
I
'5 1. PROJECT NO. _ SO3/ 2.CATE _///_ Z / 7_C PAGE OF 7
- 4. lTE.'.4 INSPECT E D lA E*1"/A L /?f T~n $/A~e f/ 0 N e J~ Wff A $ ACC C M /b> % //tM on 7/' M fo LLo win c. o. e r 1*N s >'re rio a" #L 4s/.
C. T t/ 3 II/ / - A* J e 5.t OCATION 9:2n tbr A C Tf /~ cal
- 1. O $ Csdf _ EL U /W A A P>d to/29
.I
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTICN' fl / $ f/ # /- 4 -O //f/ 8B 4 / A N A l--
- 7. STA NDAR D / COC E / PRCCEDUR E / D RAWING / SPEC:FICATION A&- Il-/-72 Mb/ / -73 f? fts 2 - ) 4 <' 9 / Rev c W o - 1/o 6 tG3 !?no I Ann /7 l- G F4 ~1
/
c 94 3 w i - s- NEA /900 -
- 8. INSPECTION ECUIPMENT USED 4/ 6 6 8 'f" W A'Ld O # 6 #*
l 9. RESUt.TS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY O 1
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY i
I
. WO7'd~' [0A 8 Z- AMAa~C7/4AJ 1* Add' sus al ASA4*d ~ /Y '.J6 UW t&Cc;/~/ En s,er- W d(s.3do sk7es 1-6 ~ ? 7 9'.Da ?-n-Ac ss Joe LWon a c- 6.s - z 2 dans is s,- n lt
\ .
'< c~v~ o. '~ -
g j, 3 _ 11. EN GINEER W? JA [, c.ca... - e.ni ve . = i we
P 3ttP 3 RECO;'.O CCNT!;Ct.
- q, FIELD INSPECTION REPOR,T(O]C (07( ccyr,et ya e e3 is j
f FILE No, FO I-I' - 0 3*l 7
- 1. F A CJ ECT NO. TO 7 ,/ 2. C ATE // ! T b f"- PAGE I CF I a.lTEMINSFECTED _.f.,A 0 71/1l- @ f YA9_c/ftTre n 9C /// n /A s A c cc iv /Jr,is //FA
, C// 7//F FC & Lca.'/Al n 0 C. T T//$1% nen / M At.
i C (J f < & /= T
/
- 5. LOCATION 0 0 N Tb 0 l- I? A 6 O 5"/ 11 Al7 A /PF A %
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTICN Wl4 f) A 1. 4 0 / U f M 9 fr1 N jf L
- 7. STANCAAD / CCCE/ PROCECUR E / C AAWING / SPEC:FICATICN A If>'S O /- / 7 2. 8 8 // / 7 I O#di .7 &
C 9/ SGI) C 'l ./ C) %l6l CG3 An?> 1 ABB>T /-C fA ".-2 C ?C f ll./ /. 3 Af e /? /9 Q c S.lNSPECTION ECulPMENT USED 8/ l 6 E T !!/ 5"L ;1 r"4dX l
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTICN: SATISFACTCRY UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTION TAKENIF UNSATISFACTORY
- 1 1
\ . / _ n N!)?~3~ ' bdA Ef' 1 dlSA~ e'c7'/ddS A7e co u /dxfw<99 R 3c
\Jw EpAs'r W d- 63. n. s4wa A.s - n.usask :, _
j ?-aP-27 a.-
-Na'a' . .
, / [- [. 7 6 11. ENGINEER j,e
?
n
/J m,.,-o,_.,.~,_.,,
.. - - . , J
i 4 c c~4 q w,0ec M
! E. .~: :
i FIELD INSPECTION REPORT (0.";i) CO."/ atec== co~rao' c -G 3 19
, cest,ctso l nLENO.EP' N4 3*N'
- 1. F ACJ ECT NO. NO3/ 2. D ATE //b/7 C PAGE k CF I
, 4. STEM INSPECTED 'I"O YAb kE~ 5N $ lfC Ylo^t NA fl/ K L2/ $ A C C O UI /L-/ S Al EA i 0N 77ff F~e L L.c w in c O e. T 7~n e Arc. rie x J t,,,An e T oo LG /- / .
t 4
- 5. LOCATION A #>l C Yo!! Y Z kl /> *t 3 ? 1% ^#fA //
'I l
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECilCN 11/ 4 u 14 f- J A)M rnAtoA/>t/,
- 7. STA NCARO / CCO E / P AC CEC UR E/ C R AWING / SPECIFICATIC N 411/ < A /-t 72 8EF / "> 3 //ru 2- 7 u
'e ?/ /?fu C Wo /o- eGs I?r01 >t- s 11i r s- & PA "A C 2. 00 11./ / ~/ Al c if f 9 <s e 8.INSPECTICN ECulP'.4ENT USED f / L & f' IJJ M~ L A 6 / G 5" I
l
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTCRY [ UNSATISFACTORY
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTCRY YOYW.* SdA d- 5A/4.;f/6c'7scLO Sd;'"l'*Cu/g'/s'WP8 -
l A r 0 ~d dre 69 d'6/-/ /r/ps7
- C- 6.3-2f 2.%- e,9 l Tw 7 7. G-sscDiei 1- 2e -n A c. J o Jee ,f&^s/7
- d 6 3 - 7 z d.dd 4-s- 7, 1
l Osseaan,eese jy l cW-$m yj ~ 13,gn agngga a,. ll/ofM
/
~
4 / t.nc4i. - a no en.ar e se . aae = p re
ATTACHMENT 7 Bechtel Field Inspection Report (QCGl-1 Report) Control Numbers C-63-20, dated 1/17/77 C-63-21, dated 1/17/77 l l L 1
M ~ , , gg 4 y C-G3 bC 2 3 RECORD CONTROL Q *
.'): .s,',
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT ccy,,ce,o_663 20 FILE NO. ~~#0'/*03*/7 1 5 T. A 'n
- 1. PPOJ ECT NO. TO3/ 2. D/.TE /' / 2* 27 PAGE I OF 4.lTEM \NSPECTED Yo1AL AE TA! S_ EC T!aN OY Nf0'A $ A CCd 11/*l / S AEd ON fis f F~e t-Go tu /Al G d C 7~ . Yn < j'fc rie,tt lL-4 a e .
D Y7 9 W~l l @ L/ ~} .*f W - / ~ _ 't
/ /
- 5. LOCATION % AlTAOL ADOM f L ?> % f 9' AAD *1 q q '
AAfA T
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTICN VI 6 f) A l-- E- 0 / AA A N A /D N/$ l
- 7. STAND ARO / CCCE/ PROCECURE/ DRAWING / SPEC FICATION A lb" I A-/- / *) 2 MEi/ / -73 S8i/ L.' ) Is. d cp/ Afjj g Q fjj c *z_/ n p (, 3 ffg(, j g gp ; y , 7
. yp'. gf g "s*r7-17 j,y ~
- 3. INSPECT;CN ECUIPMENT USED 4 /L k # 7" O 80/7 OAd68
[
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTCRY UNSATISFACTORY O l
- 10. ACTICN TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY Y YW ' ft)A f* X LAS/ f d'T/dAJf he'cesaffA5M6W kdJC Ver 69C & /- / kkPsAr w C 2 z dz m v'-s- 22 .
A y-Gm , J-)) N= *
/* *
- 11. ENGINEER ,! o -
/
l t u:<t-s - s ne u.~ m . w u s te ( f-ff. 7f 1
~ s g.- .. :
' c n Gcc,r
- 3. RECCR0 CONTROL p? r.. ,, , ...., ,>. ;, u. .
~
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT cas.noeso 663-11 nue no --ac -/-U-IP
- 1. FPO.!ECT NO. O3[ 2. DATE /-/7-77 PAGE I CF f 4.lTEMINSPECTED YD O l-- Of $ M < dfef/0 /1
_ AP f&i H< Acc0M//A9ffn oat Yf/5 fn 41-r > rs// M & C9. C 7~. f Ar <fre no N l'l A n C 96V- U- ' - / - 3 s.LOCArtON )? AA c 70 A A U/L DIN [ U M IT YA 5bV % f? ' ~fh 2 C y. J
- 6. TYPE CF INSPECTION Y / A M M d- /- ,A / /d 8h $ / d A/ M d-7.)STANDARD 4' C 9/
/CCCE/ PROCEDURE /ORAWING/ SPECIFICATION -.M bI N/- / ~ 7 2 M 8 6 /
17Fi/ ty'9 & c Mc '7 5 M E*v 7
*/-??-77 cv C % R$v i A Dfh r /- 7 fa k 2 llfjy
- s. iNSPECTICN ECUIPMENTUSED /2 h /IT @Idd 0MMA#
I
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY 7 UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTICN TAKENIF UNSATISFACTORY l o,-- e * } ~o 4 ke .Os4e7?om ,decoa AtaxD - Awo de e-
&&'est-s SA t? , A/hs- C - % r d - ts & h , w 7-2/- 7 J sto 9 -
C- M-2 z c/xrw) H-1 ? . O / rr. 4 U. m '7-2T-?7. O%. , - .[
- n. ENGINEER I[#4/iz ~
l / c.co . . - c. n , _ . ., .. . . / L jf. yf ;
ATTACHMENT 8 Bechtel Field Inspection Report (QCGl-1 Report) Control Number C-63-22, dated 4/5/77 i
'~ '
JVE
.c '
P!:' FRFNCE COPY ~sa LeJ>
- 3. RECORD CONTROt.
. O ,p ,, . FIELD INSPECTION REPORT CONTROLNO. d-MJp.
as ,
- ,1u- ~ n g
- 1. FRCJECT NrO. MO/ 2.DATE U-S- PAGE I CF
,.a
- 4. ITEM INSFECTED JM M Nd) Ll ' Y^ A Y/r bd M l dk M l AG M H A bim ar'
' ~~ ~
d + e6/ses,im ;A< IIcm< <:kAA,'<JCi- k w ,2i w . j s
./ /
h 0lb e- P$ b=0k< .Si >$bs) 8udM 1 .
- I , .
d el i 5.LOCATlON N1l-)*0l bM b N'A A b FAV */1' l . b'!>10&h Ab). / dd ' EfD'. lh/
//t>Id $ Als 2/7l 76) 2.04' t
g &id # 2 f41 2 W 7elfpnl23,'w# 7An' .(
- a
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION /b' -
1 . t'
- 7. STANDARD / CCC E / F ACCECURE / D RAWING / SPECIFICATION
-d8 r3 2 M/-0d /
- dI#?
'i .
>3 j . . .t
- j 8.INSFECTION ECh'IPMENTUSED ,,Vf ?, % - -
i
+1
' svs. . k
-0 .t
-] 1
; 9. RESULTS CF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY [ UNSATISFACTORY O 1
j 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY .3 2
-)%.
No, re . - for Anon udeericas && Ke-n _ is A77 Ached l'M7 >=~ o /E /deseks '2~.odi@e7/sJ /WA7D AAJ/) O. d 6 /-/ A'e'/sL7',<fuadd Wi2.dd<h 2-28 &J . e .' _ N
- I ** ) )
.. EEk:_ ;,.eNG, Nee duro a QC41 1 73 unne %.nas tw WFe
'REFERENCE COPY. - wy
-, .a i.. .
Ghsuk Ae CAz.,0 6gQ.f-22 c.s n. .. .
.66uyz '"'"" " "
Abo Af l .. - d- 2s/- h>-/- 9 h/es. za
} 2.so<g3 s dd /Wc/ _
l i 2.5z/z 4 0 /MC/ . 266 BC d $l /N C/ I . . . I. 1 ;S.5I$$ $ $,///Cl - . . . . . . .. . .. 1.-_. i l - .0-li *2- QN- 8 fleo. 220 ' _. Urea. / & /vf /7,4/e 44as "e . f,o9c1 / :,
.. ,4 .. -- . ._. -.. .... .
g g.
~
.-- . . ( [ [ c. ( , ,
! I_1.2 C. . l..
._ .. ..it .
l.(.S& Y. - . -...~....-.--...: 3 '
~
5,
)l AC-l .
., .--.k_...........-.......
b . c --. :. . - Y. -. . - ..' . t, li.se '.._.
.' 4....._.._..._.
j.
=
3 iE' 0A8-0)-I-)2. -.. Out 2i? '. -- Au. ./7v/G , . .
..fla;6 "S- -
~
. -. . ... .l
.-.-../$-
h- - /]G/8'lb . ..
..A i ' '
VC/8bC . , . . L-_ . . - . . . . - - 2 - . e
' bl97-id-/-/0. /$ led 2/7 ' km /& . ..... .: 5//vid U/-......_......--..-
1 U22] <68 -t, . a 6% a .- - -.. .
&,. ... - i <4 .. . '.
w .- .-.-..._ - . . - . . .
,. .! 0.- $5- ld - l- I ~1 klec.201 ./ k l'14I8 lbv'h # 2. a .
. . .A
__.08%1(.5~~l- . _ . . . .- . .._...._ _.. _ __. .. . - _. ._
~
" dOX )l.5-7 , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . _ . . .
A. . . N
--.-. I% NO -3 (MN+5h . . . - .. : - -
0NllE-7 - k
c.w -- wua. ca. , c . cm.- urs m s n . w .i r Gw. /ro -ice ' 6 nA-= 4La. ^ . ";%. n A . . .. . . ..
. /2 76// ./ //EdE .
' .s. a x } s'. ?,s, . . .'. a j t .
Q e-
. 54 ,d'sJ. 257'-Z6V' .dbd 'E- ddO i4'w/>x. ,
f-AT(d-f.3
.g . . . . '?]Cd .. ..
RirE~B,E.h*R.~*
'*" r .2 C0*,r; ';lK..
. . . . . - . . . . . O D
4fs-w./.9 . 440. .w7.' . Am.sd' A6 '*k. . ..-.... - . _ xx'
. - . . . . . . - --.... --.- .. ..=..
- n & la /.u - L&i no..'- _.Ana.n . 1 % d
- A --
2 D s d' A A M W o.
' W m ^' A o /s-' gasi/ n b'kz A -Ae/ .
'A . ,
Eft /3a_d/_ku' 697.ht-si ~ Ada 5 4 2'r ' .- M':< 5 x wA.A. ((Z~2' Y R W Y.,p .2 - * .
.Q _&<_/.*/ _._,,*n h . ... . .' /' .
^~
'A .
242e.g.7s3R
.g Yb/2/
h/Rr-kk-& _/;6. 20/ ' r/c:a.u' lA
- A iz.7an.+1.Ad I ,
Aba.B--_./&Mk
. ~. .-
~
Y3f D. h-'d ~XAa. Ro/' A.......-...... jM8 .. .
<.2 4' - ..- . . A pre . . : . . -
~
?.Ms/pHv7 T/es. zot' . . da /'f .
/ 6/p A d i / e y' ...._ .. .. ... _.........--.._A...................
\.. . . . L- ]
. . c ., m ] .
.s.v r s e c + s QL.Cu.Ik: 0.c0cc, 0= Ctrcrete O' 'A - a -
} . . .. . . 3d../?l'kJ-/-/6
- x. s -
f/Ga e:/ Jaa// A c +' . . ~ . . . <.,...s ..... ,
, ., . n u .
{ /27/.< -v+'-4 f:d a-is) x G/ Ab c.
? _. /A29 s d!'[' . Acc. , ; q 7- - .
- - s - C" t'.(J;Sf j -
i n u ._.. ~ j ._ . . . .
?$-/f /-M.//7 NAa 2./7' di~&1AV .
dd'id z 0,sD . 8/fbk/-/.5~ db. 26/ E'!ca./6' ./.A>id 9 m ,s a.o 6 _. .7 I. , . -.__. . .. _ . . .. _..... .. __.- . ...... _ _ . . _ . t c U.-Al- B-/-/d dAa 20/ ._. ASa.//v/ ' . / dad'/'.. , 4d. :o . .
,i/. 24 ~= C,.f. . . - . . . . . . . , _ . - .._..- . . . . . ......_. . . - . . . . _ .
J./29.
- A 8/*_ .
.. AG4 . . ...
JA/? 8 $/ ' ')4c. . . . ..'.
~
s.x . , . 9 si.g _ [.:rs3f. .g (f/. -
*.//w .._.'.....___,.___.. .
j .. ,, . Al;- M-Af .l' dba 2/7'. . . '/Ev'/4. .4sid9 ~~ v<7A
- r. - .
. .; ' - -~- -- - - - - -
h* . **
- 9
. U. . - . _ ..
av L 589'._.:. d.. . det.__. 3E3 . . A).vG .. ,4s. . _ _ . - _ _ . O tra 7._. 6.._ - Acc. . _... . 363 .. D.st ...A L , . . ... - -_ . := i 66e . s. Aec..._ '/Gz. . /a vs. . .... _ Ace, . . . . . . . . . _ ._. . N36/. .._. p. .v5.. . ... . ._. As . 369/' . _. 4 1 J. ....dec- . _ . _ . - -- . 22 m.s AM. ~ ....A&- . . . . ._. 362. Ao. . W: /t)SS. Ace- . . . : . adz- D. +.S, Abe. .. .. 44 / Dv'd Act. . . .
.. W6& .
G A%. .. 3d3 /OW , Ace. . . .. . .. . < A' /. x.). A:e. . - .. . . . .
.10 /6.$3. . Ace, .. '/4V' A* / fee. .. .3d6~~
s(AYd Ae. ^9Al 4 des
'" " ____.8P - _
e.a.u i- - kw sam e, ona uc s e
; . $2C%f .
.&a. Os . 8.:a.S A acc.,0chw '
l . 269 .az 9 - E2F' . . . /f . ._...
$ . SM LHL . .. . f 4Tf-D-/ ;' .
t I. ._. C/h
...mu,....d.h
. _ . _ . . . . _ . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . ,as ,. a. ..-
. _.so az . . ......
_ /i9 o .. u M v & L ' . .
,Jg3 i
. . . v4rl . . ... _ . ._ _ . . . . . . ... . .._.. . _ _ _.... .. . . . _ .
uw- 2,gs---- - ova .c 7., W z.r..l _1 nwn
.m . ,g-~ COP- ,.- g#;; ._. at v tes - -
y gg y,y . 242 GS
~
L
* *~
j /
- f yg .
h , . . ygg .,g - = . 1'- - - _L&j * /4 - v .. . . . f i
)..
l _
.l., u I ;
A/K . '-/ 27/d - 2/7' . .$=N?0f/.3-.. -- s' t - n t_ . . . _ 1- g.
..q.. gc,t_ :. . -.
__ ___._._._._...m
._m_ he e
- D.- e Og b6
- M h. . .e._ .e.. . . ..e i ... . . . . . . . . ....... - . - .. e -e..--. * * * * * * * * . * - . . . .= -
i
. ***-..=**..-*=.*#a-e
.. _ . __ ....~. _._.
=.-._ . . ... . .
l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. I g, = - - _ _ _ - O
.<- = . . --
hi-Ft.Ri-NCE COP"Y SnT G
- W5 rA
?
.,,,,(
?Liulk . :h 0.Lc. ) C- CDivnM. d'6i .$*.i???~S E/s. &7' Ae.:. /4 .%G-d -V .. __
J [. .. C ~1=v.=r 2AS . A' .
- . -. u ~.... :-
c.u .
. m. u ..;>
_..g . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . .. .- l /9 k'/ . . dbu. ^2/7' < d& /6~ fdvi4 /
---2d6~8 .
A 4 . -- - - - _ . .-- l--tc8x!7-2
. __ c o. t - . - -.. -- _ - . .
S.$ --b Scfd-- 2O
~
b b. ld. !&Y [ -.. . . . _ _ .. U887 .. .. A . ... _. _ . . .
- J.+ $ 6 3. / .
/39/JC- -
^
.g
* ~
-l 4g . .' -
6 . _ . =
% , e L.Ef&'/ E?6Y M642f A762__Edd2' .. . ./#df~ -
A 26't 9 6 6'6' z ynde _.: -- l _ ._ . h f. ..
. i- -
/DeM&rx_dda.u. ou
.med_.. - ._
. :i.: .
. , . , , . ga
_. . . m ee. .. . . , , . . , . .
.e-.e.g- . . . . . m I.=_..MM*."e*. --
w *
*l i
k J --
j.. n r, r-
. .. . O C CCg.c 1\Li Li _j.yb Cg,- ,>Y s Hr 7 o s. t g ,
f * . a+n ". . a - Q&u kt. & =Ga. I 0 .C o n OT:!4 6y d 5- 2 5. . ,.i -
.... . .a.
h 'Cf.:i-JU-!'/ '
$0.a. ES3' /a--1 / ~7
.. . . A t '.'2 1
' 246 4,3 s
.. n~ .
=
@/-sz
. . 2228.4 . . . .
.. .22240'
. .. _. az ew,i , . , _ .. . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . _ _ . . _ . .
l _. -. 2s, -
. . s.. .
yzo . . . . .
.. ~ ... . . . . . .
. s :.-
_. __2:se</ 4 GL. //26 . . .. _ _ - ?.. .. n. ., . 0/ /SC/
. '2 SC6z.J., . . . - _ . . _
e :. : . **
~
.228Ed% $d /NC 2 .
0.;28/-l.NS/0. . _- ,.bb2. ^ ~16~ .. 8ea./~7 Yd 2# -'
- i. .. ' 2528. b~~ A$. //'2 C2' < .. . .-. .. . _.' ._. ..
k . '. .
- 0. *200- w-/ /
'i //es. 238.'. _.h /} :. _ . ... /ML/ A/.
23 .gf .
~.
~
- O g
-) og - {.l.')-/- /
g - c/7 - & 43
.(0 Y' 7 x- /02 . 7 ._. s.63r'__.. 2' c -
_.. _.. _ A_ _ . . . - - _ . . .. B3x//G 7 .-.' .. . . .. - . . . - . . .. - . . . . - _ . - _ _ . . 6
.ed.-..e. ..e. .....e .e.... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .-*.==*.3 . . . . . . .
. ... $- 26/-ft)-/-S~ A da. 2*s 3 ' Arts /f' /dt.//f2. . ._. .
p ._.zz9sts al /ce z . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .. A . .. . ... .. 236A/ A 0/ /09C/ 1 . : . 29.7.d'/4 d?/ /d9c2 1
-_ g
'3. R E CO R D CO*J T ROL
'D-CONTINUATION SHEET contact No[65-E rnErao.__
. 1. PHOJECT NO. ON 7.DATE 7' '
- 4. F A GE O___ O F _
y s. von m r*0. 7.HCPCF<Tr<PME 4 77 p g g/ g a r* q g :*p 7 7g- [- g 3. z z gg Q OC- & /-/ YC' ///ts/{' c 7 sg,<) C/= Z//.37s7s/dp b/%*ucyg,gg,\._$~/3arq-B) ef_D //sf7_ ]_-~.s); f k / u- O C &/-/ 0 c~~O /~ /U - / 01 0 - 6? 3 - 8 6c-22-M) 0 / V2 / -8 _C_ __6_3 -mb'**?98 6 3 - Mi e -t 3- 2 0)
$- / Q 8 - CA.)- / - / ^2. _d_ . (p_.5- 9 00-2.2-7G)
C- /9 7- (A)~/-/O (1 - (s 3 - /O (t o -Z 6 -7 0) 0- / 96 - w -/-s 7 g- fo 3 - 9 (/ o - 2 9 - 7 c.) d- d +/3 - />J - / - s- d - 6 5-3 ok%) C / 7 (.> ' %) _C- ?S</- du - / -3 d 2 /617-7)d (IS<,f- (s l'1-zt->')) - 0 -/ 98 - /O - / - V d 6 3- 8 6e-u.,w 6 3 Z (ic -zu->c) d - /q -)- 60 -/ -// d so Go- z e-p c) _G- /9_? / - BA d /o 60-18-20) _0- / 9 ^7 - (AJ - / - :S" A/o O7 -ss-d & C [7 /-/.h &sx)&*,c; eL7 0- /90'- 6L) - /- / / d- 63-// {o-L.9-2s-) ?- /dls S 4c) - /-(o $- hf b
- 63 - Z 7 (7-s -J 2) 0- / 9 +/ /- /8 d - b3-// (/o-z9-20) -
()- /? /- to -/- / 7 8-63-s/ ((0 - 2A - J c ) f- / 94 /- h)-/- /fo 2 - b3- // (/o - 2.9 -?o)~ .. ?- /98 - h> - / / 7 Adf &?.</ef CDC 6,/-fi 6sv-ne'.47<$ ?- /9ff - kJ-/ ~F G -p 3 -/5f c;Qg. gg . g (, (g. g., y) ?- /93- 40 -/-/O O zypef) d 2'4 (>. s ,9 % /9 2 - cd-/- 4f ,c/s pr;ve,g &C6/- A & gds,rre,y .
- f7 "'- n.)- /-3 d- 6 3- g o (i-12-2))
?- 78- to-/-/ d- 6.3- Zs (1- /*7- 2 2) L /98- LD -/-B d- 63- 9 (/ o - 1 s- Ju) ' /97 /- /o d- &3 - /4'-(11-176) d- 6 is .3z. (1 21)
~
h / 9 7 Sr.) - / - # Lf - (;3 - /(, (1s s-%) d - 6 3 J/ ( 7-G.,-))' "_~ N 26f / d - 6.3 - Z 8 (*1- D) d 6 3 - /2 {tt - t -7 G) W/4- //(L- B.) - /-/ d- 6 3- /c,> d +///2- 4ff 3 (-1 0 - 9 2) (-Q[//- d- 70)
/ b. r 6 0 - /- 3 0 /$ ~
?- Es/- 40 - / - 7 d- 6 3 8(sa is -,Q d. 63 7(10-1s. 7v)
- 26/-
/<>-/-/o d.63-/ggw9d (a.5- glie.2,.,0 C 7 Ge z&
~ Q z es - to - /-/
d- 63 / 9/: ~)d- L3 - 2_s_(i- s-72) '- / 92 w -/-/V ' d /s- Cit-/ 7 c.) '- 26/- 4e) -/-S- C- fs3-/ 7 (u-**%)d 6 3 - 5 9 (,-i-n) h47 << 5- /A/ ?A'$2A/ 7?/e Sss $G~~/c'C? SA!t e .< /^/Sk e7,t-d 60Ad S.cMwe /.h. bution: e - OC Files 9 ENGINE _ 7"
- h733 GC GI 2 L
6
- ATTACHMENT 9 Bechtel Field Inspection Report (QCGl-1 Report)
Control Numbers C-63-24, dated 7/5/77 C-63-25, dated 7/5/77 C-63-26, dated 7/5/77 C-63-27, dated 7/5/77 C-63-28, dated 7/1/77 C-63-29, dated 7/1/77 C-63-30, dated 7/6/77 C-63-31, dated 7/5/77 C-63-32, dated 7/5/77 C41A-493, dated 7/6/77 6 t e
,y,--g -w - - - ,-wm,-- ~
e- weer wrypr e . w , v e. v.,en u.~, e~~~rsu e mwrmy
4v z C M qM - hfA ) * . WC5*}s,_ .
- 3. KECORD CONTROL .
g FIELD INSPECTION REPORT cay 1,c ,0 c.g. s -a // e
- gMe.,,
~ i .
FILE NO NI'b3*23
- 1. PROJECT NO. '[N 2.DATE 77 PAGE I OF !
4.ITEMINSPECTED h-'N]J/NPl/O/?) W/JPihkf IrU Of/M< bn/-) 5/) l'bhDb,& k*.!Y)l
//'ISMt , Ott.) WAA f l- Y?- h]-/-/0 >$,Jok$ b/FA#23 N/>Cl k'9&s' $sdry)b',b 4t ? /r 'k//~b, />fbn'JS A429j'1/x/ /$3$ P+ AA></ b)2/x</f'--W APA-/?N')
- 5. LOCATION O f]f YJ']!I b'/A ?Al
- 6. TYPE OFINSPECTION / f//M / /I'l##2"//~3'98!
.~
- 7. STAND ARD / CODE / PROCEDU R E / D RAWING / SPECIFICATION 8 / /"28 J'- -II
/WArnft//h) S/Gd /1/G-7.#J/-/0~ ' 8&_?/2 '/d/-y
/ /~ J.
.) k')'/. 8-/ //W '
u i
- 8. INSPECTION EOUIPMENT USED /!#M AN /) d 4 8 / /' N M N I N [
~
</ /
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTORY I
A.Jd' rr.' fot J Me's 7.,eMr /'/E'2/ ss,)3 e' .J 4eraunM,~'f'0-- Adu'd %.S~dE~ G d' 6/-/* /8'N/M'7" W C 63'-/3 Ol2 7e*> /0 -J' 9- 76'. A'u s f~s ,C Jhu ous ro.she riss &p LAvr Ov 1O/~ v-22 .-
# d 63 - 7 Z c/a' r'e,a ? u= 7 '?
b s'.~'-- Yl / M h, 77
- 11. ENGINEER recci - a vi u.~ % e 7.//- J
"jd4 c G,2 5pc J
/ cr w o 3 RECORD CONTROL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT eg .S ..g ccy1,c. _ so u
?*[*'ty[lQ %t i'%~i
~~
vnteno. p (~l-b 3 2 4 l .
- 1. PROJECT NO. [M/ 2. D ATE Y !U PAGE I OF I
- 4. STEM LNSPECTED l I/AS A fr b h/J D /O-JN-)!M BOO $$l'
/) $-2/20~///-/-/ fab ',N$ ?)u'<
AsM/d$ ADesttf Nn't)fishid/)sAsk< f tin SkJyb$/1/)b1'1/ f.?m/s/As l
/
~
f/6 A sip N ,S A W)/r) 24A9
\
- 5. LOCATION bhtb)r ll/ lib $ SA/). ???? '
- 6. TYPE OFlNSPECTION lLI/Jf)Y / Y 2. E' N)1}'? l
- 7. TANDARD/ CODE /FROCED 'R / DRAWING / SPECIFICATION ~
'/O 2 /- 72. /-78 // ~7 fib? LG 0 $ b //)se] /*) 8 7/A /s)-/-/ ' d ,4 (z k W ,c3 sgre bAA. ?f)$//d V /
- 8. INSPECTION ECUlFMENT USED */ [d# 8Ad#r //IM cd#//I yj -
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY O
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISF ACTORY ll6/Y ! S o,A TA/ Jfrd')~~/6 A/.S c // O V .1c. // A&dM/// &
sf 4d/ %S&~d~ 0 C6/~ / Er/s,e7-* 0 63-/? dx ref //- d' Jz A &J0 4 e e $'r's#6dr C-6 3 - 2. 2- t?'.et'f/ Y-S ~7 ~7 & de6}' p
'7-3f 7 b -k" ar g g 11. ENGINEER . /
t
- w -
.f, UK~ :.' .;r .: qC-
.~
Cr14 CCG.?
- . . iP,.,. e
- 3. RECORO CONTROL
, , FIELD INSPECTION REPORT cos1,0,,o c.g3,a riteno. ER / J-6 J W
- 1. PAOJECT NO. 8! 2. DATE '7 7 FAGE I OF I
- 4. lTE1.1 INSPECTED br-N)[MC bN' W^ 'o A*l< E') Cs& f'?'} EL ' b !'m$bt' k%b Ml
>>1r M /:&> 'cln> 'ff-/94 n)-/ -3"" Ajo/?A 6 &nsn- n 2 nAh ri, emA~/v4 e6/Ac,4 tifMI, /snin S s h '7, /8/d, M// 3eo,. w/ 2 Mia,Nh%d A/MrJ-,/.<'
nix /. /r/f 2 n -
/k'd-/?A/)
s.tOCATION A"nr_ A v /Y/AA #/ e'XW '20/' -
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION llr'WA Y b71AAA f/bj*bf
- 7. STAND ARD / CODE / PROCEDURE /DT. AWING / SPECIFICATION MI/-M 8I-EF.N-M N ' T I d e n er A n > A /0/_) #-A?MM./ f c7-4 3 /i d ',.,/ /._3 /;/2.
2bn Cf
/7 JP+'A7
/
S. INSPECTION EOUIPMENT USED / / //d ! 0802' 1 8 M
/*c/-
fb/ b (
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORYM UNSATISFACTORY
- 10. ACTION TAKENIF UNSATISFACTORY l
A/6N 1:a~/C /kedstes Ts.M//t7tuds 4(c3upCo, J6c' .4 L J o 6 4 6 /-' E /*wr-
- O 6 3- e d.s w o / t -z 9 J i. . urs .dk a -: 3-21-))
A ! JE haksf/
- 0 6 .?? 'Z WQ f ?d;7 Z/- T ') )
\
\ l i o re.,e g p 11 ENGINEER L A/ Y > 6049 9 Ae31 Maa' Mg htC - // * ) _ _ _ _ _
i Jr.x).OCet.4., y to 4
- 3. 7 ECORD CONTROL FIELD INSPECTION REPORT ccs,nat,o cos a7 Q)(M. I FILE NO N 'i b 'S 2.-
- 1. PROJECT NO. N 2. D ATE (b, 7 PAGE I OF l 4.ITEMINSPECTED YP' 'l(/J?/'b lf) ! ! //2PYY1 btJ '31/f] bC'/2 /AJ />Abba bs1h/'
,,),.s se h in n d ?u ) 97 2 -ki-/- L Am rt 4%/nmx) G/As ss/#
/ /
llCl~/Ib ] 5.LOCAT1ON Yt'Arb'/* lY/h l , A >}- $Nl ' 6.TYPEOFINSPECTION (h ^l f ObEhl)JhFMl h 7 STANDARD /CCDE/P_AOCEDurc / DRAWING / SPECIFICATION //2) /)/ / /-73. N "/Y
$5 ]$<~/Y'/*k'On1 AJ f-ffC /U-/- 6 '- (I--fr Q/7 /ll./ j._.] pglL h)C. 0-
$l/2 A*/) / 7
/
- 8. !NSPECTION ECUIPMENT USED /!M // e
- dM8 g/ </ '
//4 A NMf I
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY i
I 10. ACTION TAKENIF UNSATISFACTORY
/ s NOYd~' SL _L p't:A='& 7 #/ a.e)3 Nd'r.Js ad.s 4- y' ,4 crews ^t/S/Wg?
A ddd L_ S~~^.:.~ 6)C 6/ ~/ /]jM7'W 0-d',5*- 8 st'ne/, h ; 2 G. y c', . y/y. '/ r _ r ? - N'- ? '- I s t a s . 8 0 5 ) 4 7 W d 6 3 ? k f n e".t V s -?) \
't - aic'
/ ' 11. EN GIN EEP !
\ J c cs s - e 2, u.~ ~, x 7- //- 77
T L , ' . . : , .) i,, s . . Qgs.) cc6;.;, 3 RECORD CONT 0]OL [# FIELD INSPECTION REPORT c as ,,0 ,30. _ d g g g (t@G;+) , ritenO z m i./a.sc
- 1. PROJECT NO. 88! 2. D ATE f 77 PAGE I OF I
- 4. lTEM INSPECTED */ 'A A?b'O^'l 0 't#YM 'N A/14A'M I"J '? N k U2 ! Ell
- nA*M)
/_?l?t/ h-$ N-/s$ / 2
,, g ,g.? pg ').sbSb,47, IOM5 A/2fA/M/f.S b A'77/$Y hbd11)YY ppg ,9lpgpgg ..
C'MM A'GA-/OS/*)
- 5. LOCATION hWh/' Ysh'A ? $$'l i fd/
a C. TYPE OF INSPECTION ! T//Al bbYlR')S/h'h2l T. STAND AR D / CCDE/ PROCEDU RE / D R AWING / SPECIFICATION 'M OI/~72 8-Id II-W W8T WWTh& hh/) A.2/N-///-l-2 h4W2 / ! N /. 3 S2'. . _Qw.d.2f//s~ AMd-r FN/) 2 4
~
V / ' ~ B. f NSPECTION EOUlFMENT USED '! //N N d i'7# //b h M ' M / d gy/ -
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSATISFACTCRY
_ / ,
/ Y f/* f ." P 2d i/X fs%. e'7scW3 $ W./dJS( p/ A7c~dt) As/C/S/.'P&' ~
PC t%'O We't ~ G CG/-/ 0;/bf7" # 0 6.5-/2 g,s,y;_9 //- /; /% ,
;/M ebe /a,/'./7* W O 65- 2 z. .fs ry,, s'.g. py, G /:4dyj-
?-2. f ,7 )
>..~ -
SO5 N- g 11. E NGIN EER A# -
//
w I* $ Mh" $M ,MI IW hN -
/. ; '. -.;,' .- . . 3 g_
~ * -
f, . " O. . Of':M~ Gr.,0 6Cgt 3 3 i-3 RECORD CONTROL y,Q
. *.a' e, FIELD INSPECTION REPORT ooy1,otso_ y g-pg FILENO 8' / bI J C.
- 1. FROJECT NO. "' 8/ 2. DATE 7
~/ /
~7 7 PAGE ! OF !
- e. lTE'A INSPECTED b ~I/*M#' O^'} f S /1/CAl< id o'*-A'^d h) f tr' N/r> Ws'?'s"lls *?r? -!-
ErL 4a 2-EM-/U LC A w& -h Amms osdk'ns>>A.x A p/im &/ a si a s 's '
.ATA$7N /l2 2R2A/ 5 kNYes) / Of'P. # '
/bW-$$8
~. LOCATION 0/'b']/"' ll/Sl [b}- ?SE/ _
o
- 6. TYPE C F tNSPECTICN !b ' 'l- W ' E # A QE2 l
- 7. CTA NO ARO / CODE / FRCCEDURE / DRAWING / SPECIFICA TION 8 d2/- 7# I/-7? / #-7 !
? $/f/Dj"!s&_) k!1/) b 2!:A/_/-l-/-5 /7-/W2 N,/f.y jf/9 Asn A T!)//F -
V '
- 6. tNSPECilON ECuiFMENT USED ,hbAQ-N/NYs-OdA /s) E Afs'cA Y N 'r M O r 1 /D' O f y - -
r-
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY 1C. AOTION TAKEN IFUNSATISFACTORY n
l / Ylis% # -
~
rh# A.A. C'A'c~c"7~st) <.23 h 5 e *~2 1 s 't).r & ,' f f w r>xpia'(s.C/<YZ' - i $! d'$ \ _ $~["' 06 6/-l /hp Op fs#* [ f.$ ?-/3 s.& y- <-y) //-/- /f,
- ~~' \ At .h* whe l50,'E.',6',Y W C~ t5.3 -? z _,,fn j' of '/f-7y + J ;'fby &,,., _'
1 I
'.1- 2-P- 7) i l >.%i..
C - ro'
- 11. ENGIN EE R _ O> -
4'
;/
(m,.,-...,,_.~,. l
'9./ "
y .- p ,- -
- A
\ -~~&ccr Su>. y}.a
_ . s 1 3 RECORD cot 6 TROL ( FIELD INSPECTION REPORT aQ "Y' cos,notmo ggy ras e
, RECORD COPY
. ' 1 P;O.teCT NO. bY 2. D AT E ;!77 PAGE_ <~.0,F 4.lT Et.tiNCF ECTED Jh- fh U f/} k <'t? Qi?.~5l)Ax)_.tkhiml/u k^/JlY JL'y.kl5'?.L "1hdfdH-//22.5 8 f2Cb/UlWrf* s .A AmsnS A~/A//mf!q. A c/2/x',
122.a// ?, rder-: rf 2/~d/h6 6 / misc //d/72 n>L his/</hjuo s / c
//m /,b) er.cc M var szw) Ade%d&J A, -
e
.xG2/2_+ Asy,,? / Mar,. 4 w/3_6c:m'-//W, cec 6/7 J//rjl/ s?ss79,L j.:)
.D3ac.21Mde
/kt- A?d'O
- 5. L OC AT ION if //]'1Sh f LA / / _
_s. T v F E OF in5.PECT SON YEt/Al]__.fb7so.f/Nsl7 l l 7 STANCAR /CCDE/ PROCEDURE /CRAWING / SPECIFICATION - 63[.
~
[/-28 8- 7 k-6~YS -
/'I-A 3/2 ,$D 's/ /-3 K47 g/ Y
.751!D*/-Abi) s'~ hr,,) /j1h- A/--/-lb~~
/
E INSPECTION EOLnFt.iENTUSED d' IU K C, f:.)C D/ZA/// s
- 9. RE?ULTS OF INSFECTION: SATISFACTORY I N:,ATISFACTORY
- 10. ACTION T AKEN F UNSATISF ACT ORY /lY- ? 7/d
/
f f f'i/ fix)ti )./ ,GC C / /// '/ 9 6 . Q M l blf*t~C~~ ffE b;/di?.C /N4,US / l$_S~ &d_h!- / 0 63-/_.2_ b rd - / / .2 ,7(.:, Q&'d.:0c a~ 1 - p ? ) 7Gcac See aftfr W C- M - 2 2 ok% 9'-s . p y U- M :r A
'I h#'7 7 gO/ /t! //JA '/ /
co-e , - c- ; aw L w_ p 11. E N GIN E E R
/
(
THS $E stit u s_Agz_.yo_y p f
' ~ -
Vh) , .
*112CL 1LS.C 2 7 .e- }
IN ..MKnNIN.G. STRuc tar E FICIiM2 AT jj.g.q-Q;?.c g
>. U"'E E',0.FofI(f'ff).) _
, f10LS18..AT(y,gjy39p_c7.
j
- '- 7c;7, j.7_!.c_._2
[ 2. F10l SMA. AT_lO.hc2__.- noumuoncz.am e .
'I i, -
1
- nnontg Vk\p/ U %
DV 4 F/o/_ s. u s a 7 /ose-I./G6.c3 N -flOLSJA1 AT l00c'?. - {' I l
\
[gh l i Contml U.. c.4m.tm3 g c..bno _ l$lC.LLgf_;z_y BEAM p @ ggc S ~m- .7 g05.. W5
]
.I n k, f f Brcur_r.9 DEsimi 0-st...-o
~
. i
l' - - -
- .' DETAILS ON Tl!!S CRA'.*/ING 5HOV/ .TIG OEWATI.MG ST/' .t ,
b 9 _]'..b _. b D f? M d C . 11:E Fl!!AL At-0. :LT STRUCTURAL p;, .]',f g j3[c {- 3 STEEL, CEt:T!,'!CD TO BE COR C ' . , , HASE .P; ~ 7s 7 " d [.,_ /./--~[A ' pon MtCaOf tt>AING 11Y TH[. O,W r#Q .;.,3 7 337; ~y,',",7~ ' ' ' " " ' I <, -
. Q
' tn f Irpgrj{,%~ l -
I
.'._....a. _ ____
A I . 1 I :
) ,'
f, l l -4e4 y h M,3,.s T ii , c-- y --$ Py . 7 !c.Cj rt.., p r.Id 7 .. , 7p 'I 'el<t.ootiq[ Y l#
/j/,fl -/8/' I m f]q, %},_
i
~f i
i i
~ ~ !,[ } r .:.
e s (._._1,
\D ICi.l2on.'i2 st es sl
, gg jf g.g
' ~
-(
*' d.bf a't}'! [> G E... .,
p
-- i . . . . . . . . , _ .. - _
j -
- g. f g , ,, q.,gg ,,, ,,, ,, , ; fp ,,j f I.,_/5_.cl '[ku BASA _d.f C_.
s lM ,, , D _ , . . , . ~- a ap- . -.~ - - - . - - --. w >fVl r t-
)
..e s a es T? . . , s s. :s
- p ',f
**** '4 .
G n
...-..5Fb***1Y0\}lAU,?YA*lNCfc~/l4.F.,. is m 5.In1, i.)
' .5 -
A .. ._.._., 7 ,
.,. . t.) ,
n, ._ i. r-i. i .5 -u . > .2 ec r v ra . a n u e_
.- . ~ ,
__.~..._....._'..._-..i.,1 ,g[,j y s . 1 1 - l , .,t .,. _, l . ..- <. - v -
.. 2
i # I ( 6ci.) CocE . .% v,'.+ . y I 3 Kf COAD CONTROL I.* S g , I.', FIELD INSPECTION REPORT co m otuo._ y ~of RECORD COPY 1.FROJECT No. _A1-7/ 2 DATE 8,c ~!M PAGE / OF
- 4. 81 Et.t s *:SPECT ED ~/N!! 'If l!fkl-.Srf// J- 'b' 5-/ /7/re f h'sJ E ) k //r>/f) y hi ssi/ m /
Eyst!12W.J.pbe.) dlv'$2- bbd 9$ sib %2Abys,A4/$%v4 d-4,./,[y]'d 2KK.bfGd bMmf E 2 fC c2O d d E R >> $ rn d e/ o isxzh/ & id f j st i, uld ,-d /,th ,f AM77!b'v/A6rk rb /7:'d/mR denof 24f,L-f gys'2fi'7g,9pj,,fj-j/),pp. mNwjslintaenM/s,jaE2"z&do/"'M' ah. ,\ Oba: by h a egya 3^ \ .:e.
% @\N
- "U L acf ./.Md stoCATION.0*nrhefltil_"l Ou),_2L7' .
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION //O/ I N116. 'lh42M!
~
- 7. ST ANDARD/ CODE / PROCEDURE / OR AWING / SPE CtE!C ATION .
L0$ 1[bN,-8&J SfsfJ (?-lh?-N.)-l 'l JJ/./-74#/-77/2-W li8 -ShM /-3
- M2.
h$ 0- No v -
- 6. INSPECTION EOUsa. TENT USED d // O$8_ff-[./ 4. J
/ il
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SAT!SFACT ORY NSATISF ACTORY
- 10. ACTION TAKEN IF UNSAT:5 FACTORY dDNM//)
f . $* p. / lw $# b fp g f ll$ f fff&f skf = f3 .Ml't \ ft T Od-6 /~/ /b*/ CL 7~ # (_- 6.' 0 <[.' _ , W h (50 //-- /- y 6. Q d.ty{y+
/ C 3o Gpp 42f6A?~ V d? /_.5 - 7 2 . . _
. f' e '- _
.~
'I y , ,
. , , . .b i,. . 7. .
i ,_
. ' ._ , w,. , , ,~
. i .
- .g. ' . . * , t . .
!', l .
; g" ld- ..
,;].
N .
.. c . - .
. . . j . - .
pm. f..
. s. s -
=
- b 'f"-
. .c U V
.- 1 a *
. J y.gil.
. e * . _ i
- . a G E'. L.D
.b : l 'l .- ,
s
.; i.
v - Y i I.. N1 . e i t1-o ,y O
's. i M
f l l s
~ - ,, . r .
.q.;.' . f,M. yM
, I'
. . ' . *,(. ,. ,_ _
c'. N.E Y' .,
.. - . / t, , [. .
,. j. l
]1 l. C O M. l. t i+
. h . _
q'_ S I T. C 0' I E D , M D .T
. .. ,...E. : , . . . . ,_
? F' ' ,
. . , .'. st< : , I
/ .. _
(_; V, 3
.t C - N D
g_'*; Y S ,.
- C i - .
eg"
- s. sn s.
d,
, T . . ( '.
S I. i N
';T
'. - . . . a_. . . . _.
't
*.i._:i u : N S "
N C l c' ' m . ~ )L.
. s t)
U' A E D A GL i . _
. . . ~: -
~
T .
,1 4
L 9 " R L R . , ;. . w,V N A 3
* .7 1. a ' . L i, '
- q. . . s 7
BLL
. t t
E' (t .. N. l.v.:i. :l I _ i . \, > -' 4 F I i . - - ,. _ A ,
/. - ... . -
,~[-. Til Al/
i.l m'*.
. , t . f o. ..t.. n_.p m, .5. t.
- s. A' .
.. N A U' - ,A R
. l
. ) ,
- F M. F -
1 . t f . _ R R RD A A
,s .f a T .' C - . . _ _
F D
% ? n. ' n g _
- r. mH *z s
. O ~. . b l .
S EL . I 3 :._
': VW l
~p ., ; ' ;. _
7 F 1
. :i. . , l-l'. Nill O.U G
, e _
.... . 1 0
ry,, A Ver ,a- .:/ . , 1 D P
- ~
J t
? ,
E . 0
.. i
.T* T... .e . ,, /.
\.
i.
?< ? d' o ,,
O G N 1 8 . , T At f.
.* ? .., .(.
. g uo ,. Y c a !
.. - . i- ,
. 4". .
E .: ! , n<
'l . .
u e j- W 5 X - i.
.. 7
- s C U.M-
/ i i : " , 3 . ,-.i. .
. . M. r*.,.n.
' v. H . y t $ C .( , ,
%>' - - ~ .
.,C t .
.r C y1 '.
; i!
5
'R X ~_.K A a '7 [ ,
;g (r m
. ' c . . \ 6 -
? 3, ,, I \ s p, lrL G l ~
E ,. .d V. . -. .
, .ln
-l[
t 1. .J.
/_7 1 ll_ .Y J 7-
- n. m O, E .
,I f .
l. J 1 1
/
/ L b~ t o ,,
M I F .5 F . ( h ~ . , ,- . . s. 3, I l T 3 , L } L yL . w -
. pl . .
l l (% - h' . v.
. u,.
, \. h- \ .
- g. c' '
~ .
h* g.._,~
. .,'-, ^1g. -; f: .
j$. . e"
- r. ,
f j ,p3.A , (a s
.~
.s ' [e,
= -
S3/nb . ' ,, i
.r
' 7~ . ,
m
. - 's .. .
3-
- l,
. j 3a- . -
]
' 4 C e P! - , f' s.
, . u.
p t 3 3o f.
)
jpi i . : -
/ -
- .q %. a hs .'
s 1.,~r L.,< 0 - , t Ig,. 8
.\.,',. '*;w... g*
- !J,c ' - t 0 -
- - ;?. .
~- . .
f . * ., * . s, d
.i .
.. y.
~ y ; *
" 1,. ,, . .
' , , - )
,d, - ..
, .s
. / - .
'i(t /
J.
.u o .
;n/ . . -
, f_ .
}'
- .s
.. . , ' ( ,-
~ . .. , . ,
~* , , ,
- V. ., - '&.,.y
,+.,.
. L -
..~
~
,'. ,o ,
,+.
[. . )
.f
.i. , . ,.
.. ' . i , ',
, J
- . i. '
). -
y' .. 8 -
. g'./ '
. , s4 *
. J. . . .C C
e., .' ,
.q' , ..'
.s
.,. f
. y
~
Z ., .? t 3"
\
_-, d s *r-. - /. -
.P
. M c. .
- ,. s. - .
3.,. .1s s -
~
;/; _ l( -
* ~
gd c, l I 3 nEccno cosinot _j FIELD INSPECTION REPORT cc,anot e _uc.3_JJ
"' , \ RECORD COPY riu m _
i.FaOsrcT NO _EF 2. DATE _ '7 _/ FAGE c,j
.O .
a_. 4. i1 EM It:5PECTED *..ek'250AYrNO Ol r/Plk O
- f/>18vNW.alE2 A
AbYJ22.)l/M! 14vJplw)-dZd'A/-G _/_ fun,2S_fo A iw tis 2/Grj/hAbsccdx/hJf u1 4 Sci 225_ pdc 12/-2 Oed /m Am/-6-R-S,__0bace (OPA484 s pus />xi1h rb Afnss d' /7/>} /> #sn/go/ ,pY /dt2ei-6cGV/ejae /o i _(?/ x J O /;*s W / h ~ SE ' n / ~< b h / W a h i f 4
/
/"}" g -/?v#8
- 5. LOC ATION Of 7 [!#// d/ M
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION N//O //78(l.L 6M !
- 7. ST ANDARD / CODE / PAO DURE / DRAWING / SPECIFICATION -.. /f ~. 2 - $[j_ [8 02.Z_'_?[1pftifNrJ__/0SvJ A-/07-#]-/-d 'l'-6]?91L/-3_6'z.
4 Ds[06 M 7,A& E. INSPECTION EQUlFMENT US E D ! //I dd t", //l/ .
/~/d
/
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY [
10 ACTIONTAKENIF UNSATISFACTORY /2/ - 27/d
/ a.# [.
Afde U~re- 62t'G /-/ /e=/%s'7~ W d63 -/t. di,' es //-/- 7& L.3/'da)u f Aus &e Z W s t y-- W0-63 2z stares V-s- p y 9 .21-u=. %...,.. 7/}&'?7 4 &g_ _;ffw4, c., 'u enGi :EER
P v 8 ' -
. ~ 6 ,
^ , ~ '* - - - :-- %
. ,. *, ** P
..
- P * #. - . , , , , *
,. ,L
, ~.
. . e
- 4. . ,,. .e
.s - g* e -p a .e.. -g1... . 4 3. . . . .
. .e . . . w
. . g
- - .).* ., .. . tI --~ . ,1em ,.- ..* . . s . . ,. ..,! . . . - f..,a .aw.. a,a., - .--.s. ,.g.p{ . 43. .g
.).g- .*e .,
-l
.r ,
1',.. s.
.. . .e,. . . - t. - .; ,.-.
...4. u.
.g g . . . - , 4* g W 3 **
- g. ...- ., s.. - . ,- f.
p..
...w
, - - . . .- 9. .. ,..5
. . J.
.:, F ., . . ,- ;.<.g . t g.y .. .pn c.
n . ;; a .: .-
.7- : . -. . . . . .
i e l
. .1 7.2..
.g,
.g,.-{,_.. ; 7 s, .. u-..;,
- . .n
, . .t._
-.e t
o s ;
..,s s . -.:: '.' . ,' : ,. 'l' ;
* ..:s...g'*/r,- D ,". ,%,
t .
~
e
-*e -
. ' f's- t..,,.,s
;. . ,. r3..--. .
.' : -. . .:. . . .:. -- t '
4
; . .; _a
.q ', ' a. ., y..-{... . ,I' . -i. '. .. .L>. %. . u.
. . . .. v. .
r : n.~.*~$ , . ..1---}.4 ',+ ? l - r; ,'[' < 3 ... .4. .) , , - . .- a. . ...
;- ' . - ~
. .. I * . '.'. ). ;j a % j.. ? ., '
%-- ?. . . [. ) {
t
.u. _s
;.y;....s- #
- - . - .. . . ;,j ':., . t
- . ,' ~ . . ..~., ?'.3 6 i. . . ,
- f ,. } .* i- i e
.. .' - - -i .
[ . . . . . . . . . n J..i-
....%,5ls?
. . N. ,J". I.v i i . ,' -
u .Q. ?y . l d . s
- s . t. >. .s
. . > . .. f s-s -
~. : ~%, ,. . - ,.
r .e .* .. .,,,. J - . A. .n -- 2 . - -'
,s,, l%
' P 4- m sQp 2 . 3 , ,-. ...-. 4: O LL. ~
_) c !
/-"17 t ., s n,,, .: ? ..,
tg (s <:... '_. 8 - ' ~ - 4 -i~~'I .? .f. _ d[
.. ,' ~ '
O
. . , l- . -r '~~ i *a .d. 1 * ] to. >=
1 i -
- s 9(.-
s-~ , l _ . - . f . r, ,,,
. .. . .- ,. ,, s.,, . .
- , . U, -
3 u I if)- - .'f',t
, ~
U d~ - - I *'
~ ef t
' r ' t.3 ~
r e s '.-
..,t.r ~' O 'h y,. .(. L
.(. /
.- e
.r
.:4(
.; n -
.. t g '.,; --u .- . . , t
>b c<= O t N '
G ?.! U 7, 3' L ;.h ". - - i <h.. . _
< .. c ; - . . - ~ ,.
o* .
- U, _
y lw
^ , ') u.
c .c . - ~m; C. . f ,M.
,, )
. (u .
r- Is. . -. s..'. .
.,- q. ~
.-t
-s .: -
,f
.(: .
na V[ 1'
} ;.- - ,
% .j - k.. ). I * (- ) .
w.-,
' . . -w,s.s f t -.
.,1 w
. z. i - <. . , , , . . .
a< * .1 , <. ., w e
,,.',fj t ?--
1
*c1 i
c,!., 's; . ,. g - ..
=
d _. ._ f
, .r ., ,,,'% ,
.,;.. =, ;
-t ..
se a %,, f y *s e,;, . y, g
*~ J, 8.,.3 '
c.
- s. s e f"'.
.' j *-- g o, '.1 .. s.,? i ,
j -
].t-i
{~ l.* m-~j 0 , ? * % s%.- .
.-~ % l*, s = (~~. n Q*l 4 D
.'ls :
' . . i ,,. .,
- . , s ,. ,; ..J 3 %. * * .. ;- a
~'
r*~ . /_
' ' f- ._ ,n .%., , .R
;,- ~ .- (* r3
. . . s. . n ,3 . ,. ,. 3 -u p. : i.
s-
. .c - - ;
-~ s%
1 sn Q ,> f. Lm.*
- .~ . , ) t
' '^*
-a -
y . -
. s.. . .
W -
.g .
{ . . y , . ,'
.i *
.L .
I ,' A ; ' j , . :,;. - *,a.- > 7 /..
- r. .3 .;
- .s -
T _- ,,. v. ; . 0,
,s,., f) -
y s. , f, .
- s. . . . .
'y' 1,
', Q \ ..: i, ,
; d. 3 < q w exs s: * . ~.n
. . Ls :' s a tA
,o..
' * . ^ . , '
w L_. .s: et f,..
.. ; y.
--.c , w- , .; .
. s
. .. ,.s . .
s M. .-; i
*6 4 p ,C
, r. n jy -
L s. . . - p- i .- ,
>s v. u . ) .
r~ g c,,.s .- 2
* . m' >-
-'. - - ~2
<-s
- ' ;_ V , , .
- 2
? A,% a. , r
,- . .g i
.' . ', e
. ..,,3 o .e
~. .
( m . rs e.-.. , ,.. s, ., . s: .n_ . _ _
,)
i . s ._ - s"- . .. ' f .., I /'- /~
%. %. ji}j f,. ,
% .@')
' ' = i s
4
- - N] .
1
]
4 g.
* - . i n \ :. -
/ * .
rd e
*[ ',-\ - ' . . . ., ' r . -
~y jg { l["1 .: p Q
0; ,\ ' q 3. r e.J
- V .. k-4
. s.
m.y
.% s
-
- e gr-
; y -f . - . - . - .- % lg-6
,c -
c
\ .
t . . .
. y* . ; - ,
h, i v.
. s ., , -
< . . t , - - .
39 ,v.4 . 2 o . ,- ., .. g . '-
. .,,'.. :I
,. ) . .- .2 -
l ' ( '
-( 'N
. , , _-%3 13 ; .. .
, . ' ... .I '. , ,,
.a ...
.. 2 tL ; 4.# ~ * *. .. . \\ ..}
1 (' .'c
- y. - . .
,., '.,6
.. s . . . . [.I .
3 ( -
..i..%-
,. e . g. .
. , I. g ,
.e
. ,. o .
; s 1- .-- ;a \ .-A ,. ' {
r, y *
. ., - . -- ,j t .
C, , .. . . ,,*. . .,
- s ..
t i s s c. s.;
. . . -.-- t g..
(. s . c ./ -
~.<- ..
. c r.. , e -
s 1 - * - s . a. t. ,} i-
. s . .
. g .
, - - . . .. . . . c
. Q r'
y . .. L.* s Q ;: c t
- ~
es ,
'.N w . - g ,
.~
?,
- - k'k
.. i#
.( $, i '/ .
I l
. s g . g,
. . - , .,, ;. i. . - - * . y
. . .g e e 1 .. . e. ;
q.u.) cc c Z .x 3 RECORD COtiTROL f' .U co,,0 no ~6 p WJ FIELD INSPECTION REPORT JR' (T 't%gP - M C O R D L'a t i F1LE NO N'd 1.F ROJECT NO. M7/ 2.DATE 4 77 PAGE. / OF8_.fh
- 4. STET.tiNSPECTED / -
'?
- YA' f}
OU b M'M. I c/D h l
.ia m c,1 w p %>_C-B,05CblA//b-m-i-L Ayes % m/onu.tsA/d -4 :/
jn'8x7JMLud erl,/ lent JW2 26 whsM.LALEZ,422df /88$4e, dl .htd 72?r_ady._-Ary1'mv h;5c/ hwL12J11AAA Anm' nd e-62r' At mile d> (2lLmir)_it.5Qp,ctr7 /?7A2_AnA/ Act.1t'mWrnealL b Mho"r> /Q2J' =J3"Z.rk--. cuait_qbch') Mdivde,.6mir? Y3Ed2Ja4AW/&rdJ.brfEc3EJkA.fchm/2.252
'- Qm)/ &J lt/.A sM}&s1227L%L'Lb hd fikiP/P& l>ynt /A'BH R MArb./1,t&l27tf D
1f]C_&l_.zb fL1l/EM) 8W.'$ 2- /S'l509h s!.J5bi2C S E b. 5 /}7? .-A'%!d&!?g N !! Y {0'id0.-- s LOCATsON bd4141h llfd /9/ .
- 6. TYPE OF INSPECTION _! M[1! //7Mll[ 7AO!
' TANOARD/ COD PROCC RE / DRAWING / SPECIFICATION M I/- M M - dO
[ _ t[JfD?r 62) OX) W '//f- //d-#}-/-/ d-$/'Ab^ & J-9/ 0!1YJ. g7 - 0 5$$lf
/
- s. INS = ECTiON EOUIPt.'ENT USED !!8 d$. 8 d2/M ud >
s
- 9. RESULTS OF INSPECTION: SATISFACTORY JSATISF ACT ORY
- 10. ACTtGNTAKENIFUNSATISFACTORY /l& 2 7/l)
/ V O 7 T .' EOL U A/ & oc7ve.,<lS E start r' ,4rcs,4,'//.r,s.& - N .co AT O C G /-/ 0/Esf W C- 63-/6 cW'.c7e.d / /-/- ? & s.::'d,el2 FZ2- r ~..
AM0 O PP WF/'s,4.I' W d 63- 72 //.e th'f*/-S 2 7 ?) bh5?i"- d ,IsiNEER 4/dd e s _ _ _ j
- ,, .- ,: . . _ s.___
O
. a 3 RECORD CONTROL p'. CONTINUATION SHEET Cor4TnOL r40. 6 v/h/ ;
iEC0i.D COR,
- k. #. '
, FIL E rJO
- 1. rROJECT F40. _dC [ 2. DAT E f 27 4. RAGE __'2_ OF W -n S, t 6. T Ci k t.*. tv 0. 7. h CPO R T f. AM E
_1 oc-c1-I Lf -f0pc q))y) ,)/ a,3t/s ;-, 0,of6 0g/m//]f,ggg./g .194, 8 _aai Axwz_ae&4_dyt Murdg&r.%Wan dwns /unz DB!-Mfd w W e DistributiOft: White - 00 Files cs ury - o ig usor y/t y , gy,
--_7_---_-----_ .
f,h . THB.SLSillMS' ARE To PF ILSEp ' n 1 CZ ' (7 ;
. maux- ausus 57RaczaRL. EloIsM2 gAT(< l4c. .iiscg l12CL .
(U.2Ed}S,REndli;iC(2.)
; L7g;3J019 ll E101SMS AT toe,z tuc2 * *
! n . Figt SM9 Er /03C2
?
' Q Q
ELO.LSM S Ar Ichc?J. 10C,I . . l Rol SM6 AT /03C.1.10[ Cf
\ ,. 1 d
l /0/ Shi7 AT /09Ck - f,,~C QX O .
, IYPic/L BEAM S TO 00L WRos.
~
s - -
& n,,\c.-um-ve, a c.ta-30 BW-TED CONNECT /ON}
i ,e
. i, ~ ~ ~ ~f__ -
U_ y__ ~ r. i . .30DC H Tl* L DE SIG N 0 - M">- Q DL'! TAILS ON THIS CRA'.'llNG SHOV!
! A- Io, OANI C 2
'. -. Om ,
*q THE Fl!!AL AS-uJ't.T STRUCTURAL ,
, j,'.o n 7. ;j l p c,g J3 " ' tu STEEL, CERTIFIED TO BE CORR:: c g ,,y ,,
,,,- ;,]
L //A' N
' [
t Q
% E pon IAICaOFILMING BY THli._OWNF
,/$ ~
I'ADt*/AST2 CU;C ;o ~T.
.( ,
l _
, , c / ~ - -
y .
i e <,. _ ... . . . . . . . _
. y . . . . , e. , , - . . , ,- o , o ams ' .
s ' !' . . . - o m is moe.y AMBR/40 E -
. < lU = U'AhE. b ? noe.r._ M M om it itMSe,,ee,ao ., L J~H o.n!-M"4A'flt
, IM. . EAs r; 7.I ,( ,, e o, G /.M. .
v..!$ c o , n n ,,o
. uma. g. qq . ....... .)>
3A~ 5,F r- b n0 N .LL,t%N'jN.r- B.c/)1S 4n he;.0 U O
,$1 . .
_i( ,0 9Y,e . . . .
-l.
f. A 3 -e ). s ,2
> c_
f i () .s . h. 4-., . .. [ 1e O I \' P'; 1 O fl 11
,_7__
[ __ 1
,; a 2}}