ML20070T645
| ML20070T645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1991 |
| From: | Kwiatkowski D Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Congel F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20070T641 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9104050022 | |
| Download: ML20070T645 (18) | |
Text
_
o 1
s
, s Federal Emergency Management Agency
)
i Washington, D.C. 20472 MS 51991 Mr.. Frank J.
Congol Director, Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U'.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Congel:
Enclosed'is the final report for the October 17, 1990, unannounced radiological emergency preparedness drill, site-specific to the-Cooper Nuclear Station.
Participants in this drill included the State of Nebraska and the Counties of Nemaha' and-Richardson, as well as the State of Missouri, Atchison County, and the Brickyard Hill Wildlife Area.
The report, dated January 14,- 1991, was prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region VII staff and a copy has been forwarded to both States.
There were no Deficiencies identified during the October 17, 1990, unannounced drill.
However, three Areas Requiring Corrective Action were identifica.
A schedule of corrective actions will be provided by.the State of Nebraska and the State of Missouri in response to the weaknesses identified during the drill.
Additional verification of corrective actions will be provided.by FEMA Region VII during the next exercise or drill for the Cooper _ Nuclear Station.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Craig S.
p Wingo,-Chief, Technological Hazards Division at (202) 646-3026.
Sincerely, M
Dennis H. Kwiat owski Assistant Associate Director Office of Technological-Hazards Enclosure i
l i
I 9104050022 910401 t
PDR ADOCK 05000298 j
F PDR
e-T{
t TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS.............................. 111 DRILL
SUMMARY
............................................ iv 1
INTRODUCTION................................
1.1 Drill Backgrour.d........
1 1.2 Drill Evaluators................................
1 1.3 Evaluation Criteria...
2 1.4 Drill Objectives.................................
2 1.5 Drill Scenario.........,
3 1.6 State and Local Resources.......................
4 4
2 DRILL EVALUATION............................
2.1 Nebraska State Operations..............
6 2.1.1 State Emergency Operations Ce 6
2.1.2 Dose Assessment..............nter.........
6 2.1.3 Field Team Coordination 6
Monitoring Teams......./ Radiological Field 7
2.2 County Operations...........................
2.2.1 Nemaha County Emergency Operations Center.
8 2.2.2 Richardson County Emergency Operations 8
Center..................................
9 2.3 Missouri State Operations......................
2.3.1 State Emergency Operations Ce 9
2.3.2 Dose Assessment..............nter.........
9 2.3.3 Field Team Coordination
............. 10 Monitoring Teams......./ Radiological Field
................... 11 2.4 County Operations..............................
2.4.1 Atchison County Emergency Operations 11 Center.............................
2.4.2 Brickyard Hill Wildlife Area.........
11 12 3
SUMMARY
OF ARRAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION 13 11
i s
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ARC American Red Cross ARCA Area Requiring Corrective Action ARFI Area Recommended for Improvement CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOC U.S.
Department of Commerce DOE U.S.
Department of Energy DOI U.S.
Department of Interior DOT U.S.
Department of Transportation EOC Emergency Operations Center EOF Emergency Operations Facility EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPZ Emergency Planning Zone FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GM Guidance Memorandum HHS/FDA U.S.
Department of Health & Human Services /
Food & Drug Administration HHS/PHS U.S.
Department of Health & Human Services /
Public Health Service KI Potassium Iodide NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological 0654 Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1)
RAC Regional Assistance Committee SOP Standard Operating Procedure USDA U.S.
Department of Agriculture I
111
i DRILL
SUMMARY
The purpose of an exercise, or in this case a drill, is to determine the ability of appropriate of fsite agencies to respond to an emergency covered by State and local Radio-logical Emergency Response plans.
The scope of this drill limited to demonstrating the ability of State and was local governments to fully activate Emergency operation Centers (Eocs), and to mobilize all staff that report to the EOCs.
The evaluation of such an effort will, of necessity, tend to focus on the negative aspects of the exercise, on in-adequacies in planning, preparedness and performance.
This focus of attention on the negative should not be taken to that there were not a great many positive accomplish-mean ments.
Indeed, there were; however, in the interest of brev-ity, only inadequacies will herein be summarized.
FEMA classifies exercise inadequacies as deficiencies or areas requiring corrective action.
egories follow.
Definitions of these cat-Deficiencies are demonstrated and observed inadequacies that would cause a finding that offsite emergency prepared-ness was not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can be taken to protect health the and safety of the public living in the vicinity of nuclear a
power facility in the event of a radiological emer-gency.
Areas recuirino corrective action (ARCAs)_
are demon-strated and observed inadequacies of State and local govern-ment performance, and although their correction is required, they are not considered, by themselves, to adversely impact public health and safety.
In addition, FEMA identifies areas recommended for im-provement, (ARFIs) which are problem areas observed during an
- exercise, or drill, that are not considered to advers-aly im-pact public health and safety.
i While not required, correc-tion of these would enhance an organization's leval of emer-
{
gency preparedness.
There were no deficiencies identified during this drill.
However, three areas requiring corrective action were identi-fled and are summarized as follows:
Two areas requiring corrective action were identified at the Nemaha County,
- Nebraska, Emergency operations Center.
The first was identified because the Sheriff's dispatcher did iv
1 not have standard operating procedures or a call-down roster for the notification of Emergency operations Center
( E.'C )
personnel.
- Secondly, the call-down roster utilized by the county Eoc staff did not identify the second shift personnel for all of the positions.
An area requiring corrective action was identified at the Atchison County,
- Missouri, Emergency Operations Center.
Dosimetry issued to the staff was not consistent with the Atchison County plan.
A summary of the areas requiring corrective action is located in Section 3 of this report.
These inadequacies are explained in detail in Section 2 of this report under the re-spective facility, v
._~ =.=
4 1
- INTRODUCTION 1.1 DRILL BACKGROUND On December 7, 1979, the President directed the Federal Emergoney Management Agency (FEMA) to assume lead responsi-bility for all offsite nuclear planning'and response.
I'EMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency ning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:ylan-Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of radiological emergency re-sponse plans developed by State and= local governments.
Determining whether such plans can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises and drills of the plans developed by. State and local gov-ernments.
Coordinating the activities of the following Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emer-gency planning process:
- U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC)
- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- U.S. Public Health Service (pHS)
- U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
- U.S.-Department of Agriculture (USDA)
- U.S.
Department of the Interior (DOI)
Representatives of these agencies serve as members of the Regional Assistance Committee - (RAC),- which is chaired by FEMA.
Formal submission of the radiological emergency response plans for the Cooper Nuclear Station to the RAC by the States of Nebraska and Missouri and affected local jurisdictions was followed by a-critique and evaluation of these plans.
Conditional approval of these plans was granted by FEHA on June 26, 1984..
Formal' approval, including the Alert and Notification System,-was granted by FEMA on May 20, 1987.
An unannounced radiological emergency preparedness drill conducted for the Cooper Nuclear Station on October 17, was I
w
t
--w w
ry 4
e,p4
-y d '
w a= r
'n-
.~
- 1990, to assess the capability of State and local emergency preparedness organizations-to fully activate their fa-cilities, mobilize their response staff, and complete the no-tification of all participating organizations during a radio-logical emergency at the Nebraska Public Power District's Cooper Nuclear Station.
In Nebraska, the plans evaluated in-cluded the " Nebraska Radiological Emergency
Response
Plan" and the emergency response plans for Nemaha and Richardson Counties.
In Missouri, the plans evaluated were the
" Mis-souri Radiological Emergency Response Plan" and the emergency response plan for Atchison County.
This vas-the first unannounced drill for the Cooper Nuclear Station for the States of Nebraska and Missouri, and for the respective coun-ties.
Following the drill, an Exit Interview with the State and lo-cal governments, and the licensee, was conducted by the RAC
-Chairman to discuss the results of the drill.
1.2 DRILL EVALUATORS Eleven FEMA personnel evaluated the offsite emergency response functions.
These individuals and their drill as-signments are given below:
OBSERVER AGENCY ASSIGNMENT Robert Bissell FEMA Atchison County EOC Marlee Carroll FEMA Nebraska State EOC' Jim Donley FEMA Brickyard Hill Wildlife Area Jim Halloran FEMA Atchison County EOC Dewey Johnson FEMA Richardson County EOC Gary McClure FEMA Richardson County EOC Joe Schulte FEMA Nemaha County EOC Norman Valentine FEMA Missouri State EOC Jim Winger FEMA Nemaha County EOC Connie Wisniewski FEMA Missouri State EOC Jane Young FEMA Nebraska State EOC 1.3 EVALUATION CRITERIA The evaluation criteria for this exercise were:
1.
44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 350.9.
2.
NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev.-1 (all applicable re-quirements).
3.
The Exercise Evaluation Methodology (EEM):
Ob-jective thirty-six of the thirty-six standardized 2
o objectives identified in FEMA GM-EX-3 issued by FEMA 'as a composite'of exercise (drill) demon-strable elements contained in KUREG-0654.
4.
Nebraska Radiological Emergency Respons-a Plan for Nuclear Power Plant Incidents.
5.
Radiological Emergency Response Plan for Nuclear Power Plant Incidents, Nemaha County, Nebraska.
6.
Radiological Emergency Response
- Plan, Richardson County, Nebraska.
7.
Missouri Nuclear Accident Plan, Cooper Nuclear Sta-tion.
8.
Atchison
- County, Missouri Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
9.
FEMA GM PR-1, folicy on NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev.
1, and 44 CFR
- 350, Periodic Require-ments (October 1985).
1.4 DRILL OBJECTIVES On July 27, 1990, the Nebraska Civil Defense Agency:sub-mitted offsite objectives for this drill.
These objectives were revised on August 8, 1990.
The Missouri State Emergency Management Agency submitted drill objectives on August 14, 1990.
The drill was intended to demonstrate the ability of the States of Nebraska and Missouri, along with Nemaha and Richardson counties in Nebraska, and Atchison County in Mis-
- souri, to carry out emergency mobilization and activation functions _during an unannounced drill.
In this
- drill, only objective number 36, regarding unannounced drills and exercises, was intended for demonstra-tion and evaluation.
The term " unannounced" refers to a drill.or exercise which is held without the time and date being made known to the responders.
For purposes of evaluating response capa-
- bilities, it its deemed appropriate to inform responders that unannounced drill will be held during a particular
- week, an keeping the-date and time confidential until offsite notifi-l cation prompts the responders to activate.
This evaluation concerns a drill, and as such, required l
a specific, limited degree-of response.
3
i The drill was to include the activation of both the Ne-braska and Missouri State Emergency operations Centers (EOCs).
Also to be activated were the Nemaha and Richardson County EOCs in Nebraska and the Atchison County EOC in Mis-souri.
The Nebraska and Missouri State Dose Assessment and Radiological Field Team Coordination functions were to be activated and report to their respective State EOC.
Other field personnel who deploy from EOCs were to report to the FEMA evaluator to establish their readiness, but were not re-quired to deploy to their assigned locations.
Each of the ateve facilities was to establish communications with other organizational EOCs.
When all appropriata staff at each fa-cility had been mobilized, and notification to other organi-zations had been completed, the drill was to be terminated.
1.5 DRILL SCENARIO The unannounced drill began at 0900, due to an ALERT be-ing declared at the Cooper Nuclear Station.
A SITE AREA EMERGENCY declaration was subsequently made, based on dete-ricrating plant conditions.
1.6 STATE AND LOCAL REBOURCEB Listed below are organizations that participated in this drill:
State of Nebraska 1.
State Civil Defense Agency 2.
Department of Health, Division of Radiological Health The State of Nebraska was granted credit for the mobilization of the following State agencies during the September 11, 1990 Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station unannounced and off-hours drill.
- Nebraska Highway Patrol
- National Guard
- Department of Agriculture
- State Emergency Board (Agriculture)
- Game and Parks Co; mission
- Department of Rotus
- American Red Cross Richardson County, Nebraska 1.
County Board 2.
Mayor of Falls City
- 3. Civil Defense Office
- 4. Richardson County Sheriff's Office
- 5. Falls City Police Department 4
- 6. Falls City Fire Department
- 7. Social Services 8.-American Red Cross 9.
County Health Department
- 10. County Attorney
- 11. Falls City Ambulance Eemaha County, Nebraska
- 1. County Board
- 2. Civil Defense Office
- 3. Mayor of Auburn
- 4. Mayor of Faru 5.. Mayor of_Nemaha
- 6. Nemaha County. Sheriff's Office
- 7. Auburn Police Department
- 8. Auburn Fire Department
- 9. Brownville Fire Department
- 10. Nemaha Fire Department
- 11.. Social Services
- 12. American Red-. Cross
- 13. County Health Department State of Missouri
- 1. State Emergency Management Agency Division of Health, Bureau of Radiological Health
- 2.
Missouri State Highway Patrol 3.
4.= National Guard
- 5. Division of Family Services Atchison County. Missouri
- 1. County Commission 2.
County Civil Defense Office
- 3. Atchison County Sheriff's office
.4. Conservation Department 5.
Family Services
- 6. County Road & Bridge
- 7. County Health Department Y
5
-~.
2 DRILL EVALUATION 2.1 NEBRASKA STATE OPERATIONS 2.1.1 Etate Emercency Ocerations Center Objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Objective number 36, ability to carry out emergency re-sponse functions (i.e.,
activate EOCs, mobilize staff that report to the Eocs, establish communication linkages and com-plete telephone call-downs) during an unannounced drill, was fully demonstrated.
-The Nebraska State Emergency operations Center received notification of the Alert by telephone at 0900.
Notification for the. mobilization of EOC staff was initiated at 0909 and was completed at 0939.
Full staffing of the Eoc was accom-plished at 1015.
Only the State Civil Defense Agency and the Department of Health-mobilized to the EOC during this drill.
The re-maining State agencies, with responsibilities at this facil-
- ity, did not report, as credit was granted to the State -of Nebraska for mobilization of these agencies during the September 11, 1990 Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station unannounced and off-hours. reporting drill.
Communication links were adequately demonstrated.
The primary-system, dedicated telephone to Nebraska State Patrol, failed-during the initial stages of this drill.
However, the backup system was utilized by the utility.
Notification oc-curred directly to-the Nebraska State EOC.
Since the State EOC is not located within the plume EPZ, dosimetry is not required for staff at this location.
How-
- ever, dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI) were provided to State emergency workers who departed (simulated) from this
-facility to locations within the plume EPZ.
l-Summary:
There were no inadequacies observed that would require corrective action for this function, objective num-ber 36 was fully demonstrated.
I 2.1.2 Dose....Assespaent objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Objective number 36, the ability to carry out emergency response functions-(i.e., activate EOCs, mobilize staff that 6
.. - ----- -.. -. ~. -
e s
report to the EOCs, establish communication-linkages and com-plate telephone call-downs) during an unannounced drill, fully demonstrated.
was Dese-Assessment is performed by_ the State Division of Radiological-Health at the Emergency Operations Facility
( EOF),
which is located at the plant site.
At 1009, the Di-vision of Radiological Health was contacted by the Nebraska Civil Defense -Agency and instructed to report to the EOF.
- Hewever, for this drill, the Dose Assessment staff reported to the State EOC, but was not required to deploy to the EOT.
The equipment required for this function, including com-munication systems, was available for transportation.
As the facility to which the Dose Assessment staff would be deployed is located within the plume EPZ, the appropriate dosimetry,.
including potassiur iodide (KI),
was distributed to staff before departure.
Summa ry:
There were no inadequacies -observed that would require-corrective action for this function.
Objective num-
-ber 36 was fully demonstrated.-
2.1.3 Field Team Coordination and Radiolocical Field Monitorina TenRA-Objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Objective number 36, the ability to carry out emergency response functions 1(i.e., activate EOCs, mobilize starf that
- report to the EOCs, establish communication linkages and com-plete telephone call-downs) during_an unannounced drill, was
- f ully_. demonstrated.
Field Team Coordination was performed-by-staff from-the L.
Nebraska Division of Radiological Health.
The Field Team co-ordinator and. Radiological'
?) eld Monitoring Teams.would normally deploy to the_ EOF.-
- However, for_this
- drill, the
~
Field Team Coordinator and field teams reported to the State-EOC, but vereinot= required-to deploy to the EOF.-
The equipment required for this function, including com-L munication systems, was available'for transportation.
As the facility to which the Field-Teamfcoordinator l
field teams would deploy is.within the plume EPZ, the appro-and
-priate dosimetry,-
including potassium iodide (KI),
was dis-tributed to staff before departure.
7
~
4 l
Simmary:- There were no inadequacies observed that would I
require corrective action for this function.
Objective num-ber 3( was fully demonstrated.
2. :t COUNTY OPERATIONS 2.2.1 Nemaha County Emercancy Ocorations Center objective to be demonstrated:
36.
oujective number 36, ability to carry out emergency re-l sponse functions (i.e.,
activate EOCs, mobilize staff that L
report to the.EOCs, establish communication linkages and com-plete telephone call-downs), during an unannounced drill, was i
l not adequately demonstrated.
The Nemaha County Sheriff's dispatcher contacted the Civil Defense coordinator;
- however, neither a standard operating procedure ner a call-down roster available for notification of additional county person-was nel.
Following notification by the Sheriff's dispatcher, the Civil' Defense Coordinator reported to the Nemaha County EOC and then completed notifications of the remaining EOC person-nel.
In addition, the call-down roster utilized by the Nemaha County EOC staff was inadequate, as it did not identify backup positions and the respective telephone numbera cor the Radiological officer, Social Services Director, Medical of-i
- ficer, Public Information Of ficer, Red Cross Representative, Transportation Coordinator, Peru Mayor, Nemaha
" official",
l and the Brownville and Nemaha Fire Chiefs.
Both the Nemaha County Sheriff's dispatcher and the county EOC-staff must be provided with a complete call-dcwn roster and/or standard operating procedures.
Since the Nemaha County EOC is not located within the l
plume EPZ, dosimetry is not required for EOC staff.
- However, dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI) were available for dis-tribution to emergency workers who would depart from this fa-cilityLto locations within the pluma EPZ.
{
Both primary r.nd secondary communications systems were available, but or.ly the primary system was demonstrated.
The secondary system consisted of a hand-held radio.
A direct 1
phone line to the utility could also be utill:ed, but was not demonstrated.
Summarv:
objective-number 36 was not adequately demon-strated.
8
- d, Areas Reauirina corrective Actiga I
1.
The Nemaha County Sheriff's dispatcher did not have standard operating procedures or a call-down roster for notification of EOC personnel. (NURFG-0654, E.2.)
2.
The call-down roster utilized by the Nemaha County EOC staff did not identify backup positions and the respective telephone numbers for the Radiological Of-ficer, Social Services Director, Medical Of ficer, Pub-lic Information
- officer, Red Cross Representative, Transportation Coordinator, Peru Mayor, Nemaha "Of-ficial",
and the Brownville and Nemaha Fire Chiefs.
(NUREG-0654, F.1.)
2.2.2 Richardson County Ruercancy ODerations Center Objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Objective number 36, ability to carry out emergency re-sponse functions (i.e.,
activate EOCs, mobilize staff that report to the EOCs, establish communication linkages and com-plete telephoto call-downs), during an unannounced drill, was fully demonstrated.
The Richardson County Emergency Operations Center re-ceived notification of the Alert 'tatus by telephone from the s
Richardson County Sheriff's dispatcher at 0918.
Notification for the mobilization of the EOC staff was initiated at 0931 and was completed at 0951.
Full staffing of the EOC, in ac-cordance with the Richardson County Emergency Response
- Plan, was accomplished at 1012.
As this facility is not located within the plume
- EPZ, dosimetry is not required for staff members.
Dosimetry was
- issued, however, to the EOC staff and emergency response field personnel who may deploy to the plume EPZ.
Potassium iodide (KI) was also distributed to the emergency response personnel.
Both primary and backup communication systems were dem-onstrated.
All equipment functioned satisfactorily, i
Su===rv There were no inadequacies observed that would require corrective action for this function.
Objective num-ber 36 was fully demonstrated.
t 2.3 MIS 800RI STATE OPERATIONS 2.3.1 State Emercancy ODerations Center Objective to be demonstrated:
36.
1 9
,e Objective number 36, ability to carry out emergency re-sponse functions (i.e.,
activate EOCs, mobilize staff that report to the EOCs, eutablish communication linkages and com-plete telephone call-downs), during an unannounced drill, was fully demonstrated.
The Missouri State Emergency Operations Center received r.ctification of Alert ststus from the Cooper Nuclear Station at 0910.
Notification for mobilization of appropriate staff was ini' d at 0911 and completed at 0930.
Full staffing of the Et'
- s accomplished at 0954.
Both primary and secondary communication systems were available.
- However, only the primary system was demon-strated.
Since the State EOC is not located within the plume EPZ, dosimetry is not required for staff at this location.
How-
- ever, dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI) were provided to State emergency workers who departed (simulated) from this facility to locations within the plume EPZ.
Summarv:
There were no inadequacies observed that would r' quire corrective action.
Objontive number 36 was fully demonstrated.
2.3.2 D21e Assessment Objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Objective number 36, the ability to carry out emergency response functions (i.e.,
activate EOCs, mobilize staff that report to the EOCs, establish communication linkages and com-plete telephone call-downs) during an unannounced drill, was fully demonstrated.
The Missouri Bureau of Radiological Health is respon-sible for this function.
At 0922, the Bureau of Radiological Healt'. was contacted by the Missouri State Emergency Manage-ment Agency and instructed to report to the State EOC.
Dose Assessment would normally be performed at the Emergency Op-erations Facility (EOF) at the plant site.
- However, for the purpose of this drill, the Oose Assessment staff reported to the State EOC and was not required to deploy to the EOF.
Appropriate dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI) were distributed to the Bureau of Radiological Health personnel.
The equipment required for this function, including com-munication systems, was available for transportation.
10
as Summary 4 There were no inadequacies observed that would require corrective action for this function.
Objective num-ber 36 was fully demonstrated.
2.3.3 Elp1d Team coordination and Radiolooical Field Monitorine Teams objective to be demonstratedt 36.
objective number 36, the ability to carry out emergency response functions (i.e.
activate EOCs, mobilize staff that report to the Eocs, establish communication linkages and com-plate telephone call-downs) daring an unannounced drill, was fully demonstrated.
Field Team Coordination was performed by staff from the Missouri Bureau of Radiological Health.
The Coordinator and Radiological Field Monitoring Teams would normally deploy to the Emergency operations Facility (EOF) located at the plant site.
- However, for this drill, the Field Team Coordinator and field takes reported to the State EOC, but were not r r.-
quired to report to the EOF.
All of the appropriate equipment required for this func-
- tion, including communication systems, was a*.allable for transportation.
Appropriate dosimetry and potassium iodtde (KI) were distributed to the Field Team Coordinator and field teams, summary:
There were no inadequacies observed that would require corrective action for tnis function.
Objective num-ber 36 was fully demonstrated.
2.4 County Onorations htchison County Eneroency Onorations Ceglig 2.4.1 objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Objective number 36, ability to carry out emergency re-cponse functions (i.e.,
activate 20Cs, mobilize staff that report to the EOCs, establish communication linkages and com-plate telephone call-downs), during an unannounced drill, was not adequately demonstrated.
The dosimetry kits issued at the EOC did not include the CDV-730 (0 to 20 R) pockst dokim-
- eters, as required in the Atchison County Radiological Emer-gency Response Plan.
The Atchison County Emergency operations Center received notification of the Alert status from the Atchison County Sheriff's dispatcher at 0905.
Notification to mobilize EOC 11
1 I
staff was initiated at 0906 and completed at 0918.
Full staffing of the Eoc was accomplished at 0931.
eeth primary and secondary communication systems were adequately demonstrated.
With the exception noted above, dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI) were distributed to the EOC staff.
Desimetry is required, as this facility is within the plume Epz.
j Eumm&Iy objective number 36 was not adequately demon-strated.
Area Aeeuirina corrective Action 3.
The dosimetry kits issued at the Atchison county Emer-gancy operations Center did not include the CDV-730 (o
to 20R) pocket dosimeters,.as required in the Atchison County Radiological Emergency
Response
plan.
(NUREG-0654, X.3.a.)
2.4.2 1gickyard mill Wildlife Area objective to be demonstrated:
36.
Demonstration of this objective was limited to notifica-tion and mobilization of staff responsible for performing aerial route alerting in portions of the Brickyard Hill Wild-life Area not under siren coverage.
The pilot was not re-quired to prepare the plane and fly the route.
This limited mobilization was fully demonstrated.
The pilot was notified of the Alert status via telephone by the=Atchison County Sheriff's dispatcher at 0907.
The pi-lot was at the airport,- located in Tarkio,
- Missouri, at the time of the call.
proper dosimetry and potassium iodide (KI) were available for the pilot at the airport, Summary:
There were no inadequacies observed that would i
require corrective action for this function, objective num-ber 36 was fully demonstrated.
1' 12
~ f t '4
- l o
i 3
SUMMARY
OF AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION NEBRASK1 OPERATIONE Nemaha county RERI2ency operations Center 1.
The Nemaha County Sheriff's dispatcher did not have standard operating procedures or a call-down roster for notification of EOC personnel. (RUREG-0654, E.2.)
2.
The call-down roster utilized by the Nemaha County Emer-operations Center staff did not identify backup gency positions and the respective telephone numbers for the Radiological Of ficer, Social Services Director, Medical of ficer, Public Information of ficer, Red Cross Represen-
- tative, Transportation Coordinator, Peru Mayor, Nemaha
" official",
and the Brovnville and Nemaha Fire Chiefs.
(NUREG-0654, F.1.)
M igOURI OPERATIONS Atchison_ county mueraency operations center 3.
The dosimetry kits issued at the Atchison County Emer-operations center did not include the CDV-730 gency (o
to 20R) pocket dosimeters, as required in the Atchison County Radiological Emergency
Response
Plan.
(NUREG-0654, K.3.a.)
13
_.