ML20070Q265

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards fitness-for-duty Program Six Month Rept for 900701-901231,providing Summary of Mgt Actions Required by 10CFR26.71
ML20070Q265
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 03/22/1991
From: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9103280296
Download: ML20070Q265 (2)


Text

9 EK]UOSTE @ Dily yff,i""'""".cm""n"".

w.m,w,m a u March 22, 1991 n n o se

%aw WwI ks ea< Cen in ? ht b ia%

U.

S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:

Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Deaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. I and No. 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 DV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Fitness-For-Duty Program Six Month Report Supplement By letter dated March 13, 1991, we provided the Fitness-For-Duty Program Six Month Report for the period July 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990.

The attached supplement to the above report provides a summary of management actions as required by 10 CFR 26.71 (d).

If there are any questions concerning this report, please contact Ms. Pat Casasanta at (412) 393-5238.

Sincerely, J.

D.

Sieber Vice President Nuclear Group Attachment cc:

Mr.

J.

Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. T.

T.

Martin, NRC Region I Administrator Mr.

A.

W.

DeAgazio, Project Manager I

I 9103280296 910322 PDR ADOCK 05000334 R

Q}3 PDR

_~..--. _ - - -.- -

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT' ACTIONS 1.

Problem Identified:

Deginning 10/90, Duquesne Light Company identified discrepancies with results reported on fourteen blind proficiency samples sont to-Roche Biomedical.

Investigation proved the following:

a.

The blind samples supplied to the licensco were felt to be unstable.

I i

b.

Roche Laboratory's method of screening appeared to have failed.

this was cased on Roche obtaining GC/MS values greater than 1000 on repeat analysis.

c.

It

appeared, on one THC cample, that the antiserum used was too specific.

The licensee's audit of Roche Biomedical indicated a

low-bias on the analysis for THC carlier in 1990.

To arrive at the above conclusions, the licenace used the services of another DHHS certified laboratory and purchased Bio-Rad, FDA

approved, blind samples.

Using the split

method, samples were sent to Roche Biomedical and another DHHS certified lab.

Results and screening mathods were compared and conclusions drawn to explain the falso negative reports.

-Solution Implemented:

To-correct these problems, the licensee'has initiated the services of Clinical. Pathology Facility, Pittsburgh,-PA, as its primary lab, and now purchase FDA approved bl'ind proficiency samples for quality

control, t

o

- _ _ _,