ML20070M011
| ML20070M011 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1983 |
| From: | Letsche K KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20070M013 | List: |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8301120218 | |
| Download: ML20070M011 (2) | |
Text
--
~
[;. _g -
\\
Jcnuary_7, 1983_
,I
.y.
.c
~
DOLKETED
- UNITED STATES OF. AMERICA USMC
? NUCLEAR REGULATORY ^ COMMISSION E3 JAN10 Ali:j5 BefoEe the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board r'
l*,TE Or tyghy,,p:,
9^,',
3 M-Q Q.*iG.i S
. RAl!CH
~
\\'
In. the Matter :of
- )
.Jn LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
)
)'
Docket No. 50-322-0.L.
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,
)
. Unit 1)
)
)
^
)
STATUS' REPORT ON HALAPATZ CONCERNS e
During the hearing on December 21, 1982, the Board ordered.
1 Suffolk County to report to the Board on January 10, 19 83, -its y4;
. decis' ion on whother, it[ intends to advance a contention relating to'the Halapatz concerns.
(Tr. 17,216).
The County is filing.
this.. report to inform the Board.of the current status of this
_ ;.9..
matter.
The County will be prepared to address this matter
- TC '
.or$11y on January 10.
T' l~ The Board's requirement that the County report on January 10bi.tsdecisiononadvancingacontentionontheHalapatz y.--.
l DPO;was contingent upon the County's having received two things
.g by1. December 30, 1982:l (1) the Staff's report on resolution
}
of.ithe Halapatz DPO, and (2) a copy of the Monticello inspection g
program. The Board sthted_that if_both items were not provided
. =- :.,
i...____.__..
to;the County by December 30., the dates set for reporting on, i
filing and respondingito a contention would 'need to be changed.
.. ~..
(Tr. ~17,216-20).
The.'~dhte's" set at that time were :
=
83011202i8 830107 PDR ADOCK 05000322 Q-PDR
e-u.
~
u
. County report on decision to' advance contention January'10 t
County to' file contention and arguments in. support thereof January 14 LILCO ind Staff response y January 21'
~
~
The County received the Staff report on December 30, 1982..
Following a review of the. Staff repott, the County sent a letter to Staff counsel setting forth several specific questions which remained unanswered bycthe Staff report.
The Board was provided a copy of the letter but a copy is also attached hereto.
'At the time this report is~being pye)sred, the County still has not yet received a copy of the'Mont1 cello program, although in response to the County's inquiries to the Staff, we have been informed that the Staff has sent it to us.
Accordingly, the-County is ' not in a position to determine by January 10 whether
~
it will advance a contention on the~Halapatz concerns.
Assuming that the County does,'in fact, receive the pertinent
.Monticello documents today, the County proposes that the dates originally set b'y the Board (which were based on a December 30 receipt date) be extended.
The new' schedule would be as follows:
County report on decision January 19 County formal filing January 25 l
i LILCO and Staff response February 1 l
Respectfully submitted, David J. GiLmartin 4
Patricia A.
Dempsey Suffolk County Department of Law Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppa ge, New York 11788 Kaqla J.
Lets e ~
KIMPATRICK, LOCKHART, HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 stor.wwsa 3L Sunmt COL __JNewaruasefe emesam e,cm,rsm -
-