ML20070J290

Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors - 1981

ML20070J290
Person / Time
Issue date:	11/30/1982
From:	Brooks B NRC OFFICE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (ORM)
To:
References
NUREG-0713, NUREG-0713-V03, NUREG-713, NUREG-713-V3, NUDOCS 8212270459
Download: ML20070J290 (118)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- NUREG-0713 Vol. 3 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1981 Annual Report U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission offico of Resource Management B. G. Brooks ,d**"*%, / n B212270459 821130 O 3 PDR

NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources:

1. The NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20555

2. The NRC/GPO Sales Program, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555

3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publications, it is not intended to be exhaustive.

Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Docu-ment Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and ir.vestigation notices; Licensee Event Reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee documents and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the NRC/GPO Sales Program: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-spoasored conference proceedings, and NRC booklets and brochures. Also available are Regulatory Guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service include NUREG series reports and technical reports prepared by other federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal and periodical articles, and transactions. Federal Register notices, federal and I state legislation, and congressional reports can usually be obtained from these libraries. Documents such as theses, dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and non-NRC conference proceedings are available for purchase from the organization sponsoring the publication cited. Single copics of NRC draft reports are available free upon written request to the Division of Tech-nical information and Document Control, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Copies of industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regulatory proiess are maintained at the NRC Library, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland, and are available there for reference use by the public. Codes and standards are usually copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating organization or, if they are American National Standards, from the American National Standards Institute,1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. GPO Pnnted copy price: _$5.50 ~ c' y., - \\ c, [ ', * ; "a ', J ~,. 1 16 : ' f..f,.,, g < & v - -c..

c.,f.

",e % % ; - %.;,. -

NUREG-0713 Vol. 3 Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1981 Annual Report Manuscript Completed: September 1982 D:te Published: November 1982 B. G. Brooks Management Information Branch Office of Resource Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20666 s..... r ,9 g, ' e h '.k *1 ,k-r- A \\;

A' k

PREVIOUS REPORTS IN SERIES 1. T. D. Murphy, "A Compilation of Occupational Radiation Exposure from Li ht Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, 1969-1973," USAEC Report 0 WASH-1311, May 1974. 2. T. D. Murphy, C. S. Hinson, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1969-1974," USNRC Report NUREG-75/032, June 1975. 3. T. D. Murphy, et al, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1969-1975," USNRC Report NUREG-0109, August 1976. 4. L. A. Johnson, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1969-1976," USNRC Report NUREG-0323, March 1978. 5. L. A. Johnson, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Light Water Cooled Power Reactors, 1977," USNRC Report NUREG-0482, May 1979. 6. B. G. Brooks, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors, 1978," USNRC Report NUREG-0594, November 1979. 7. B. G. Brooks, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors, 1979," USNRC Report NUREG-0713, Vol. 1, March 1981. 8. B. G. Brooks, " Occupational Radiation Exposure at Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors, 1980," USNRC Report NUREG-0713, Vol. 2, December 1981. i -r'---.---..___.___.

ABSTRACT This report presents an updated compilation of occ'upational radiation exposures at commercial nuclear power reactors for the years 1969 through 1981. This report is one of a series of reports which are published annually and is available at all NRC Public Document Rooms, or may be puechased from either of the organizations identified on the inside of the front cover of this report. The bulk or the information contained in this document; was derived from reports submitted to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission in accordance with requirements of individual plant technical specifications and in accordance witn S20.407 of Title 10, Chapter 1, Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR S20.407). This year's report contains data received frca the 70 light water cooled reactors (LWRs) and one high temperature gas' cooled reactor that had been declared to be in commercial operation for at least one full year as of December 31, 1981. This represents an increase of two reactors over the number contained in last year's report. The total number of personnel monitored at LWRs in 1981 was 124,504, a slight decrease from that found in 1980. The number of workers that received measurable doses during 1981 was 82,183 which is about 2,000 more than that found in 1980. The total collec-tive dose 'at LWRs for 1981 is estimated to be 54,142 man-rems, which is only about 350 man-rems more than that reported in 1980. Ine result was that the average dose per worker decreased slightly to 0.66 rems, and the average collective dose per reactor decreased by about 20 man-rems to a value of 773 man-rems. The collective dose per megawatt year of generated electricity by each reactor also decreased slightly to aa average value of 1.7 man rems per megawatt year. A brief prospective on the health implications of these annual occupational doses is also provided. The staff projected that receiving 0.66 rems each year during an entire working career would increase the risk of dying from cancer by about two percent over the risk if no occupational radiation exposure were received. The report also presents a summary and some analyses of the exposure data containd in the "terndnation reports" that have been submitted by nuclear power licensees to thetCommission pursuant to 10 CFR 620.408. As of December 31, 1981, personal identification and exposure information had been collected and cemouterized for some 210,000 of these terminating reactor personnel. Analysis of these data indicate that in 1980 there were about 2,200 quarterly transient

• workers who incurred an average dose of 0.46 rems and some 5,500 yearly transient
• workers who incurred an average dose cf 1.11 rems.

The collective dose (about 6,000 man rems) incurred by the yearly transients constituted 11% of the total collective dose calculated for 1980. The termination data reported in 1981 has not yet been completely computerized, and, therefore, such analyses for transient workers in 1981 were not available for presentation in this report. Transient workers are those workers who begin and end their employment or work assignment at two or more #ifferent licensed facilities within one calendar quarter (quarterly transients) or one calendar year (yearly transients). iii 4 ~ g .-i

m CONTENTS Page g ABSTRACT................................ iii 1 1. INTRODUCTION........................... 1 2.

SUMMARY

OF OCCUPATIONAL MONITORING DATA AND POWER = 7 GENERATION........................... 2 2.1 Definitions of Terms and Sources of Data........... 2 2.1.1 Number of Reactors. 2 2.1.2 Collective Dose............ 2 ~ 2.1.3 Breakdown of Collective Dose............. 2 2.1.4 Workers with Measurable Whole Body Doses....... 6 f 2.1.5 Megawatt years of Electricity............. 6 5 2.1.6 Collective Dose per Megawatt year........... 6 j 2.1.7 Average Rated Capacity................ 6 2.2 Average Annual Occupational Doses.............. 7 2.3 Plant Rankings by Ccilective Dose per Reactor.... 12 3. ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS..................... 16 3.1 Annual Whole Body Dose Distributions............. 16 3.2 Dose Distributions by Work and Job Function......... 19 3.3 Health Implications of Average Annual Doses......... 19 3.4 High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor............. 23 i m 4. TERMINATION DATA SUBMITTED PbRSUANT TO 10 CFR 920.408....... 25 K L 4.1 Termination Reports, 1969-1980................ 25 4.2 Limitations of the Termination Data............. 25 4.3 Transient Workers per Calendar Quarter............ 25 y 4.4 Transient Workers per Calendar Year............. 28 4.5 Temporary Workers per Calendar Year............. 31 5. PERSONNEL OVEREXPOSURES...................... 34 REFERENCES............................... 36 APPENDIX A - Personnel, Dose, and Power Generation Summary, 1969-1981......................... 37 APPENDIX B - Annual Whole Body Doses at Licensed Nuclear Power Facilities, 1981.................. 51 APPENDIX C - Number of Personnel and Man-Rems by Work and Job Function, 1981.................... 59 m E E E V E.

TABLES AND FIGURES ~ TABLE 1-Summary of Annual Information Reported by Commercial g Boiling Water Reactors, 1969-1981.............. 3 TABLE 2 Summary of Annual Information Reported by Commercial Pressurized Water Reactors, 1969-1981............ 4 TABLE 3 Summary of Annual Information Reported by Commercial Light Water Cooled Reactors, 1969-1981............ 5 TABLE 4 Boiling Water Reactors Listed in Ascending Order of Man-Rems per Reactor, 1975-1981............... 13 TABLE 5 Pressurized Water Reactors Listed in Ascending Order of Man-Rems per Reactor, 1977-1981.............. 14 TABLE 6 Light Water Cooled Reactors Listed in Ascending Order of Man-Rems per Reactor, 1977-1981.............. 15 TABLE 7 Summary Distribution of Annual Whole Body Doses at Commercial Light Water Cooled Reactors, 1969-1981...... 17 TABLE 8 Collective Annual Doses by Work Function and Personnel Type, 1981..................... 20 TABLE 9 Percentages of Annual Collective Dose at LWRs by Work Function........................... 21 TABLE 10 Annual Collective Doses by Occupation and Personnel Type, 1981.......................... 22 TABLE 11 Annual Doses at Fort St. Vrain, 1974-1981.......... 24 TABLE 12 Termination Reports Submitted for Reactor Personnel, 1969-1981.......................... 26 TABLE 13 Transient Workers per Calendar Quarter at Nuclear Power Facilities, 1972 1980................. 27 TABLE 14 Transient Workers Per Calendar Year at Nuclear Power Facilities, 1977-1980.................... 29 TABLE 15a Actual and Compiled Dose Distributions of Transient Workers per Calendar Year at LWRs......... 30 TABLE 15b Effects of Transient Workers on Annual Statistical Compilations.................. 30 TABLE 16 Temporary Workers Per Calendar Year............. 32 TABLE 17 Personnel Overexposures at Power Reactors, 1971-1981..... 35 Vi

FIGURES FIGURE 1 Average Annual Collective Doses and Number of Workers at Commercial Light Water Cooled Reactors, 1969-1981...... 8 FIGURE 2 Plot of Total Annual Values at all LWRs, 1969-1981...... 9 FIGURE 3 Plot of Average Annual Values at all LWRs, 1969-1981..... 10 FIGURE 4 Average, Median, and Extreme Values of the Collective Dose per Reactor, 1973-1981................. 11 FIGURE 5 Cumulative Percent of Annual Individual Doses, 1981..... 18 vii

OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE AT COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS 1981 1. INTRODUCTION l In 1974, the NRC staff began changing the technical specifications of operating nuclear power reactors to require the submittal of an annual report which indicated the number of individuals exposed and their cumulative annual doses, broken down by type of personnel, work function, and occupation. (The format for reporting is contained in Regulatory Guide 1.16, " Reporting of Operating Information - Appendix A Technical Specifications," and is similar to that shown in Appendix C of this report.) To obtain data for previous years, each reactor licensee was requested to provide similar information for each year since 1969 in which they had a unit in commercial operation. In every instance, an estimate of the total collective dose (man-rems) incurred by all individuals monitored during the year was provided; however, the number of workers who received measurable doses could not always be determined. The information given in Appendix A, therefore, is not complete for all plants for the years 1969 through 1972. On February 4, 1974, 10 CFR g20.407 was amended to require licensed nuclear power utilities, among other licensees, to submit an annual statistical report indicating the distribution of the whole body doses of all individuals mon-itored at each facility. These reports (see Appendix B) allow an estimate to be made of the total collective dose, and of the number of workers receiving measurable doses. These values were used throughout this report (except for Tables 8, 9, 10 and Appendix C) for the years 1973 through 1981. The plant operating data, such as plant capacity and megawatt years of electricity generated, was obtained or derived from data included in various issues of the " Operating Units Status Report," (Ref. 1), and from the report "U. S. Central Station Nuclear Power Plants, 1976" (Ref. 2). This report, and each of its predecessors, ;ummarizes information reported during previous years. However, more plant specific data, such as the annual report submitted by each plant pursuant to 10 CFR 20.407 and Regulatory Guide 1.16, may be found in those documents listed on the front cover of this report. Additional operating data and statistics for each of the years after 1972 through 1979 may be found in a series of reports, " Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience" (Refs. 3-8). These documents are available at all NRC public document rooms, or they may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, as shown in the Reference section. The 1980 and 1981 reports in this series should be published in 1983. 1 M b

2. SupMARY 0F OCCUPATIONAL MDNITORING DATA AND POWER GENERATION 2.1 Definitions of Terms and Sources of Data 2.1.1 Number of Reactors Tables 1 through 3 provide summaries of the plant data given in Appendix A for boiling water reactors (BWRs), pressurized water reactors (PWRs), and all light water cooled reactors (LWRs), respectively. The number of reactors included each year (those without parentheses) are those reactors that had been in commercial operation for at least one full year as of December 31 of each of the indicated years. The figure shown in parenthe-ses (for the years 1969-1972) is the number of reactors that provided both the number of individuals that received measurable doses (referred to as " workers") while visiting or working at the facility and the summation of the annual whole body doses (called man-rems) of all of these workers. The annual collective doses shown in parentheses and the other information marked with an asterisk are also based on the data submitted by the number of reactors shown in parentheses. 2.1.2 Collective Dose The collective doses (in man-rems) shown for 1969 through 1972 were ob.tained by special requests made to the licensee or from monthly and semi-annual operating reports that had been previously submitted pursuant to plant technical specifications. When possible, the number of workers receiving measurable doses was obtained in the same manner. Beginning with 1973, the collective dose and the number of workers receiving measur-able doses were obtained from the annual reports submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 620.407. From these reports, the annual collective dose was calculated by summing the products obtained by multiplying the number of individuals shown in each of the dose ranges (shown in Table 7 and Appen-dix B) by the midpoint of each range. Past experience has shown that the actual mean dose of individuals reported in each dose range is less than the midpoint of the range. Thus the collective doses

• shown in this report may be about 10% too high.

2.1.3 Breakdown of Collective Dose In Appendix A, the collective dose that was calculated from the 520.407-type annual reports is broken down by work function (operations and maintenance) and by personnel type (contractor, and station and utility combined) for each plant site. The proportion of the collective dose shown for o ch type is the same as that reported in the plant's annual report required by its technical specifications (see Appendix C). This was done in the following way: (1) The collective dose incurred by workers in the work function " Reactor Operations and Surveillance" on each plant's annual report submitted AA few facilities reported the actual collective dose of those individuals shown on the 620.407-type annual report, and this figure was used instead of the calculated value. 2

TABLE 1

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY COMMERCIAL. BOILING WATER REACTORS 1969-1981 ^** ^ * * Average Average Number Annual Gross { Of Collective MW. Yrs Man-rems Rated Reactors Doses Electricity Per Capacrty included (Man-roms) Generated MW.Yr Not $WWe) Doses (Rems) (Man-rems) Reactor Reector I 1969 3 (2) 586 (300) 290' 192 1.03' 195 145' 3.1 64 112 1970 6 (4) 764 (510) 1,321' 912 0.39' 127 330' O.8 152 267 1971 7 (5) 1,784 (1,069) 1,873* 1,30P 0.57' 255 375* 1.4 187 339 1972 10 (7) 2,858 (2,130) 2,258' 3,058 0.94* 286 323' O.9 306 434 W 1973 12 4,564 5,340 3,394 0.86 330 445 1.3 283 459 1974 14 7,095 8,769 4,059 0.81 507 626 1.7 290 513 1975 18 12,611 14,607 5,786 0.86 701 812 2.2 321 611 1976 23 12,626 17,859 8,586 0.71 549 776 1.5 373 647 l 1977 23 19,042 21,388 9,098 0.89 828 930 2.1 396 645 1978 25 15,096 20,278 11,774 0.74 604 811 1.3 471 668 1979 25 i 18,322 25,245 11,671 0 73 733 1,010 1.6 467 669 1980 26 29,530 34,094 10,868 0.87 1.136 1,311 2.7 418 664 1981 26 25.471 34,832 10,899 0.73 900 1,340 2.3 419 674 During the years 1969 through 1972, all plants reported collective doses but a few did not submit the number of personnel that received measurable doses. The number of reactors that did report doses and number of workers is given in parentheses in the second cofumn. The collective doses shown in parentheses in the third column, as well as the asterisked numbers in the remaining columns, are all based on the data submitted by the number of reactors shown in parentheses. This correction, and others, changed some of the values from those appearing in earlier NUREG documents.

TABLE 2

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY COMMERCIAL PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS 1969-1981 ^** ^** ^**

• Average Average Number Annual Gross Workers Dose Collective Personnel With MW-Yrs g

y,y RM Per Do:e Per Measurable Generated Reactors Doses Electricity p,, included (Man-rems) Generated MW-Yr Net (MWe) Doses (Rems) (Man-rems) Reactor Reactor 1969 4 (3) 661 (363) 454' 1,097 Of0* 165 151' O.6 274 349 1970 4 (3) 2,738 (1,099) 1,340' 979 0.82* 684 447' 2A 245 349 1971 6 (4) 1,844 (912) 905* 1,912 1.01* 307 226* 1.0 319 399 1972 8 (5) 3,708 (2,083) 1,885* 2,544 1.11' 464 377* 1.5 318 446 b 1973 12 9,399 9,440 3,770 1.00 783 787 2.5 314 533 1974 20 6,627 9,697 6,824 0.68 331 485 1.0 341 619 1975 26 8,268 10,884 11,983 0.76 318 419 0.7 461 643 1976 30 13,807 17,588 13,325 0.79 460 586 1.0 444 675 1977 34 13,469 20,878 17,346 0.65 396 614 OA 510 699 1978 39 16,713 25,720 19,840 0.65 429 659 OA 509 723 1979 42 21,659 38,877 18,249 0.56 516 924 1.2 434 729 1980 42 24,266 46,237 18,287 0.52 578 1,101 1.3 435 721 1981 44 28,671 47,351 20,552 0.61 652 1,076 1.4 467 745

• During the years 1969 through 1972, all plants reportad collective doses but a few did not submit the number of personnel that received measurable doses. The number of reactors th t did report doses and number of workers is given in parentheses in the second column. The collective doses shown in parentheses in the third column, as well as the asterisked numbers in the remaining columns, are all based on the data submitted by the number of reactors shown in parentheses. This correction, and others, changed some of the values from those appearing in earlier NUREG documents.

I

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF ANNUAL INFQRMAY10N REPORTfB ~ BY COMMERCIAL LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORS 1969-1981 ^ " '

• Number Annual

^"## ^"'* Average Average Gross Dose Mutin Penonnel WM Of Collective MW-Yrs Man-rems Rated Reactors Doses Electricity Per Capacity included (Man-rems) Generated MW-Yr Net (MWe) Doses (Rems) (Man-rems) Reactor Reector 1969 7 (5) 1,247 (663) 744' 1,289 0.89* 178 149' 1.0 184 247 1970 10(7) 3,502 (1,609) 2,661* 1,892 0.60* 350 380' 1.9 189 300 1971 13(9) 3,628 (1,981) 2,778* 3,220 0.71* 280 300* 1.1 248 367 1972 18 (12) 6,566 (4,213) 4,1 13 ' 5,602 1.02' 365 345' 1.2 311 408 cn 1973 24 13,963 14,780 7,164 0.94 582 616 1.9 299 496 1974 34 13,722 18,466 10,883 0.74 404 543 1.3 320 575 1975 44 20,879 25,491 17,769 0.82 475 579 1.2 404 630 l 1976 53 26,433 35,447 21,911 0.75 490 669 1.2 413 663 1977 57 32,511 42,266 26,444 0.77 570 742 1.2 464 677 1978 64 31,809 45,998 31,614 0.69 497 719 1.0 494 702 1979 67 39,981 64,122 29,920 0.62 597 956 1.3 447 705 1980 68 53,796 80,331 29,155 0.67 791 1,181 1.8 429 699 1981 70 54,142 82,183 31,451 0.66 773 1,174 1,7 449 719 During the years 1969 through 1972, all plants reported collective doses but a few did not submit the number of personnel that received measurable doses. The number of reactors that did report doses and number of workers is given in parentheses in the second column. The collective doses shown in parentheses in the third column, as well as the asterisked numbers in the remaining columns, are all based on the data submitted by the number of reactors shown in parentheses. This correction,and others, changed some of the values from those appearing in earlier NUREG documents.

pursuant to their technical specifications (the first number in the last columns in Appendix C) was determined. (2).The ratio of this dose to the total collective dose (the last number in the last columns in Appen-dix C) was calculated and multiplied by the total collective dose that had been estimated using the $20.407-type annual report. This product is the number of man ress shown'in the column headed " Operations" in Appen-dix A. (3) The number of man-reas shown in the column headed " Maintenance and Others" in Appendix A was determined by first summing the collective doses incurred by workers in the five remaining functions, given in Appendix C, and then calculating the fraction that this dose is of the total collective dose. This fraction was multiplied by the total collective dose estimated from th $20.407-type annual reports to yield the number of man-reas shown in this column of Appendix A. (4) A similar procedure was followed in determining the number of man-rems in the type -of personnel columns " Contractor" and " Station & Utility" in Appendix A. 2.1.4 Workers With Measurable Whole Body Doses The number of workers with measurable doses, rather than the total number of individuals monitored, is shown in Tables 1 through 3 and Appendix A. These values were used to calculate the average annual dose per worker and the average number of personnel per reactor. This was done to delete those individuals, many of whom probably did not routinely work in radia-tion areas (and were monitored for convenience or for identification purposes), who may have received exposures too small to be detected by personnel monitoring devices. 2.1.5 Megawatt years of Electricity The number of gross megawatt years (MW-Yr) of electric energy generated each year by each facility is shown in Appendix A. This number was obtained by dividing the gross megawatt-hours of electricity annually produced by each facility by 8,760, the number of hours in the year. The gross megawatt years of generated electricity that are presented in Tables 1 through 3 are the sums of that produced by all of the reactors included each year. This sum is divided by the number of those reactors included each year to yield the average amount of electric energy generated (MW-Yr) per reactor, which is also shown in Tables 1 through 3. 2.1.6 Collective Dose per Megawatt year The number of megawatt years generated was also used to determine average values of the annual collective dose per megawatt year generated. This was calculated by dividing the total collective dose by the total gross megawatt years generated to yield a quotient, having the units " man-rems per MW-Yr," that is used as a measure of the doses incurred by workers at power reactors in relation to the gross electric energy produced. This value was also calculated for each *eactor site and is presented in Tables 4 through 6 and Appendix A. 2.1.7 Average Rated Capacity The average rated capacity, shown in Tables 1 through 3, was found by dividing the sum of the net maximum dependable capacities (Net MWe) of 6

l l the reactors by the number of reactors included each-year. The net I maximum dependable capacity-is defined to be the gross electrical output as measured at the output terminals of the turbine generator during the 'most restrictive seasonal conditions, less the normal station service loads. This is the " capacity" shown for each plant in Appendix C. 2.2 Average Annual Occupational Doses Some of the data presented in Tables 1 and 2 is graphically displayed in Figure 1, where it can been seen that the average collective dose and average number of workers per BWR has been higher than that for PWRs for i the last seven years and that the values of both parameters have, in general, continued to rise at both types of facilities. At BWRs in 1981, the average collective dose, dose per worker, and collective dose per megawatt year decreased by about 1S% from the 1980 figures to 780 man-rems, 0.73 rems, and 2.3 man-rems per megawatt year, respectively. The number of-workers per reactor (1340) remained about the same. At PWRs, the values of these three parameters increased to 652 man-rems per reactor, 0.61 rems per worker, and 1.4 man-rems per megawatt year, while the average number of workers per reactor (1,076) remained about the same as the 1980 value. Figures 2 and 3 show plots of much of the information that is given in Table 3 for all light water reactors. One can see that the total values of the three parameters (workers, collective dose, and megawatt years) showed only slight increases over last year's values, while the average dose per worker, number of workers per reactor, and collective dose per megawatt year decreased slightly. To further assist in the identification of any trends that might exist, Fig.4 displays the average and the median

• values of the collective dose per reactor for BWRs and for PWRs for the years 1973 through 1981.

The ranges of the values reported each year are shown by the vertical lines with a small bar at each end marking the two extreme values. The rectangles indicate the range of values of the collective dose exhibited by those plants ranked in the twenty-fifth through the seventy-fifth i percentiles. Since the median values are not as greatly affected by the extreme values of the collective doses, one can see that they do not fluctuate as much from year to year as do the average values. The median collective dose for PWRs appears to have levelled off at about 400 man-rems, while for BWRs, it has generally increased and reached a high of 940 man-rems in 1981. In all but one case the median collective dose is less than the average, which indicates that the collective dose for most plants is less than the average collective dose per reactor (the value that is widely quoted). t 4 AThe value at which 50% of the reactors repcrted greater collective doses and the other 50% reported smaller collective doses. 7

FIGURE 1 COMMERCIAL LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORS 1969 - 1981 AVERAGE ANNUAL COLLECTIVE DOSES AVERAGE NUMBER OF WORKERS 1400 1400 ~ 1200 .~ ............. B W R 1200 .................... B W R PWR PWR / LWR LWR A l% 2 i *. ,E,1000 ,/ .h 1000 f l 8 i' !! 800 j'. / E 300 'f.g** / 5 / 8 e L x /.s -e .I s'- 5 l e 800 t 800 S \\ .I i f h l \\ 'i / l */ \\ / /w./ !. /\\/ N' _ A ~~ l u ,o y.] \\ -,i ,v, l m M 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1900 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 191H Year ya, l 1

FIGURE 2 PLOT OF TOTAL ANNUAL VALUES AT ALL LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORS 1969-1981 1 I I I I I I I I I I I l 80 TOTAL ANNUAL VALUES: 2 2 (1) WORKERS (2) MAN-REMS (3) MEGA-WATT YEARS (4) REACTORS u3 70 70 ,**,e 7 ,/ k 60 / 80 l k / o h / o y p' j-B 5 8a s0 / / s0 viz / l 3$ I S ea / a !! 40 / [ / p#.! h 40 i / E 4' / d./gR i e- / / e, o of f S s l / / E / / s/ m i / /oAp z 20 20 f / 10 / / 10 } s/ = I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 1969 70 '71

• 72

~73 '74 '7s '76 ~77 '78 '79 '80 ' 81 1982 YEAR 9

FIGURE 3 PLOT OF AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUES AND AT ALL LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORS 1969-1981 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 X X$ AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUES: $ g 12 (1) WORKERS PER REACTOR ~ 6"$ (2) MAN-REMS PER REACTOR f m (3) MAN-REMS PER MEGA-WATT YEAR f g3 (4) DOSE (REMS) PER WORKER f DI / I g 10 / / 5t; s / om f 55 1 ,- go. 8 / cm $3 *= / om OS c< / z2 /\\ 6 <a N s,' / g mz W< km gAWBM pea BEACTOR 2R 50

a. 64 N

mm 35a m. dE 2 /[\\ \\ MAN-REMS PER MW-YR / %j ~--~~ ,/ y /N w.#*

• *
• YE PYh/

KEI * '"" * -* -* " D 5' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0-.J69 '70 '71 '72 '73 '74 '75 '76 '77 '78 '79 '80 '81 1982 YEAR 10

FIGURE 4 AVERAGE, MEDIAN AND EXTREME VALUES OF THE COLLECTIVE DOSE PER REACTOR 1973-1981 6.000 5.000 Middle 50% of BWRs 4,000 Middle 50% Of PWRs 3.500 @ Average Collective Dose @ Median Collective Dose 3.000 V

?

2.s00 1 'r 8 4= 2.000 E Q 2 E 1.500 ~ o g hg 1.000 6 ',',;- [ '878 'sn i. Year 11

2.3 Plant Rankings By Collective Dose Per Reactor-The number of reactors from which data have been collected is still rather small, and the information reported by a few reactors where unusual conditions or problems may have occurred could have a large impact on some of the statistics presented in this report. In an effort to identify those plants, Tables 4 and 5 list the BWRs and PWRs in ascending order of man-rems per reactor for each of the years 1976 through 1981. Two other parameters, dose per worker and collective dose per megawatt year, are also given for each plant and could have been used in ranking the plants i as well. Also, shown for the first time is a parameter "CR" which is defined to be the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at indi-vidual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose. This shows the proportion of the total collective dose at the plant that was received by individuals who incurred annual doses of 1.5 rems or greater. CR is one of the parameters that the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) recommended be used in the analysis and comparison of exposure data. The draft of the latest UNSCEAR report

• states that the normal values of CR lie between 0.05 and 0.50, and one can see that CR for most of the plants fell within this range in 1981.

Table 6 ranks the plants that had been in commercial operation for at least five years as of December 31, 1981. At BWRs, the number of workers per reactor, year, and values of the average collective dose per reactor-year and collective dose per megawatt year increased by about 10% over those that had been calculated for the five years ending in 1980. At PWRs, the five year averages for the collective dose per megawatt year and the collective dose per reactor year increased less than 10%, while the average number of workers per reactor increased by about 14% over the previous five years' values. The average dose per worker decreased slightly at both BWRs and PWRs during this period. In general, one can see from the listings in Tables 4 through 6 that the plants having the lower values of the three parameters shown for each year are usually the newer plants. Some of the older, smaller plants also appear near the top of the listings since they report small collec-tive doses; however, the ratio of their man-rems to the number of megawatt years generated will be higher because of their limited power generation capacity. Usually, when a plant reports a large annual collective dose, and a large man-rems to megawatt year ratio as well, it indicates that extensive maintenance or modifications were undertaken during the year. For example, the PWR facilities reporting high values for these two parameters during the last few years generally have been involved in major repair and replacement of steam generators. At BWRs, torus modifications contributed significantly to their 1981 doses. At both types of plants, in-service inspections and other plant modifications (such as pipe hangers, snubbers, and fire protection) were also major contributors. It should be noted that there are significant differences in nuclear plant designs, even between plants of a given type. Therefore, one should be careful when attempting to draw conclusions from this data, sThe final report should be made available by the General Assembly of Official Records, United Nations, New York, late in 1982. 12

TAKE 4 BOILING WATER REACTORS LISTED lN ASCENDING ORDER OF MAN. REMS PER REACTOR ~ 1977 1978 igyg gest IMan. Dem Men. IMan-Dose Man-I I Me Dase Mas Mea-Dom Men. im w nam. Rems per Rems Rems per Ans Rems per Rems Rus per Rus Rme per Rams per Wwkw per per Worker per ,,, w her pe, per Worker per per Wwher per SeeNeme $ste (Rams) MW.Yr. Site Neme Sits (Remel MW-Yr-Sits kame Site (Remsl MtYr. Sitr Name 2 S

• • 'I

""'Y'- Srte Name Site (Renel MW-Yr. CR Cooper Station 198 0 53 0.37 Cooper staten 158 0.53 027 Humboldt Bay 31 123 M Humboldt Bay 22 0.15 ."."e Humho4dt Boy 9 0.12 - ' O.00 La Crome 225 1.59 20.36 La Crese 164 030 740 Menticaele 157 IL42 0.30 La Crones 214 1.78 8.25 La Crosse 123 0.08 4.2 0.00 Yarment Yankee 258 0 40 0 81 sg Rock Pome 175 041 330 La Crosse 186 1.22 7.75 Hatch 1,2 449 0.23 0.45 Blg Rock Point 100 0.33 2.8 0.47 Herch 1 244 0.19 0.48 Duene Arnold 299 0.56 034 Cooper 221 0.52 IL37 Big Rock Pomt 354 0.59 724 Cooper Station 579 0.82 1.3 0.45

• '
• P"*'

Bg Rock Post 334 0.72 7.59 Ovane Arnold 275 0.36 0.78 Monticelle 531 148 1.29 Heesh 1,2 1,337 0.46 1.5 0.35 Millmens Poet 1 394 0.37 0.68 Sig Rock Poset 455 0.73 35.00 Nine Mile Point 591 0.50 1.11 Vennont Yankee 731 0.58 1.7 0.46 r M N att 2.s age Srowns ury 1&2 863 0.48 0 65 Oyster Casek 487 0.55 0.88 Browns Ferry 1,2,3 1,825 0.57 0.H Monricarte 375 035 0A2 Broums Perry 1,2,3 2,300 0.70 1.1 0.40 F 667 ES2 030 Duane M 671 R$1 1.98 Hetch n 465 0.36 1.04 Brud 1&2 1004 OAS 048 Oyster Creek 017 0.54 2.9 0.40 Quod Ch a 3D 1031 1.14 1.06 Dresden 1,283 1529 0.79 123 Han n 582 0.27 1.45 Drseden 1,2,3 2,105 0.77 1.95 Drseden 1253 1894 0.91 1.43 Browns Ferry 1,2A3 1792 0.75 030 Dresden 1,2,3 1,800 0.75 1.78 Cooper Station 859 1.08 1.32 IllontiesNo 1,004 0.80 2.8 0.52 uptscello 1000 US 2.34 Peach Bottom 2&3 1317 039 030 peach Bonom 2,3 1,388 0.81 0.80 Peach Bottom 2,3 2,302 0.83 1.88 Peach Bottom 2,3 2,508 0.00 2.2 0.94 Quad Cnus 1&2 1818 m t44 %pse 8H W M4 komWankee 1,338 H3 M4 Poech Bottom 2&3 2036 0.72 134 Brunswick 1,2 2,438 0.08 2.s 0.08 Fupstrick 1080 0 78 2.34 Pitzpeuick 1A25 1 57 2.5 E44 Duane Arnekt 974 0J6 833 Quad Cities 1,2 2,158 1.28 2.01 Brunswick 1,2 3,870 1.02 5.83 Brunemck 2 1120 0.74 3.86 neinstone 1 1,406 0.00 4.9 0.44 Mdisone t 1239 0J9 223 vermont Yankse 1,170 0.98 2.85 Fitzpatrick 2,040 0.99 4.00 Quad Cities t,2 3,146 1.40 2.7 0.81 Nes Mde Point 1383 1.27 3.99 Oyaw Creek 1275 OSI 236 Brunswick 1,2 2.603 0.90 3.21 Mdistone s'oint 1 2,158 til 532 Nine Mlle Point 1,502 0.78 4.1 0.58 Oywar Creek 1814 038 4.18 Pilgrim 1327 0JO 235 Nine Mae Point 1,497 1.13 4.23 Quad Cities 1,2 4,838 1.57 5.58 Puyim 1,830 0.eni 4.5 0.44 Humboldt sey 1905 1.79 Averages pe' Pis rim 3,828 1.02 10.08 Mdistone Pomt 1 1,793 1.01 3.55 e Pderia l 3.42 1.87 9.91 Reacter 604 034 1.35 A'eges per A'"'8" 8 Reactor 733 IL73 1.57 Reactor 1,138 0.87 2.72 l Reacter 828 0 89 2.1 l l I For these ute enth more then one operating reactor,the numbus of man 4 ems per reactor is obtained by dividing the number of man-vems reported by the ses by the number of reacters. 2CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems so the total annual collectin dose.

TABLE 5 PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS LISTED IN ASCENDING ORDER OF MAN-REMS PER REACTOR 1981 1990 1979 1978 1977 Das Mese I 'Ma* Does Man. Men-Dom Men. Roms por Asms IMan-Dom Man-IMan-Dom Ms. Rome per Rams Rams per Rome 88' h per Rems per Rome 2 per Worker per per Worker per Rems per Rome Se thems) MW.Yr. CR SaaName Site (Rend MW Yr. $ste Name Site (Rems) MW-Yr Site Name $ste (Rams) MW.Yr. SiteName Sde (Remel MW-Yr. Sim Name per Worker per per Wormer per Bevor veilev $7 0.23 0.27 Davis Bess 48 0.11 a.15 Davis some 30 0.10 0.08 Davie Bene 154 0.12 0.50 onsie-Geese 88 0.10 0.1 0.04 Pelindes 100 0.30 0.1g Fartey 1 108 020 0 15 Prairieldand s,2 180 0.30 E21 Kaasunes 186 0.41 0.38 Kemounee 141 0.37 0.3 0.18 Prairie telend 1&2 221 0.40 024 Fort Calhoun 128 0.28 0.29 Prairie idend 1.2 353 0.38 0.44 Prairie t innd 1,2 320 0.30 0.4 SJO Kamounee 140 0.45 0.33 gag ~ Heddam Neca 117 054 021 Rancho Sece 128 0.44 0.18 Three MileIdend 1,2 394 0.17 Three hate telend 1,2 378 0.18 Prairie Island 1&2 300 0.42 0.33 Keweense 127 0.37 0.31 Yankas Rome 213 E42 5.98 Seever Vaney 220 0.10 0.4 0.13 Salem 1 122 021 022 st. Lecie 152 0.34 0.23 Yankee Rone 127 0.29 0.85 North Anno 1 218 0.10 0.32 seiem 1 264 0.15 0.3 ggg Keanume M4 0.48 03 Trojan 174 0.29 022 Seever Valley 132 0.19 0.80 Cook 1,2 483 E37 0.32 Point esseh 1,2 SOS 0.77 0.8 0 48 Point Beach 142 430 123 0.49 San Onofre 139 0.27 0.35 Point Beech 1.2 598 1.07 0.82 Yankee Rome 302 0.00 2.8 0 43 Mdisone Point 2 243 0.38 0.47 Maine Yankee 54 0.39 0.29 ladien Point 3 308 0.32 E84 Calvert Chffs 1,2 007 0.30 0.4 0.10 I Meine Yankee 245 0.48 0.40 &2 8 Troian 257 E35 E41 Calmrt Cm (2 877 E45 E52 Cook 1,2 085 E40 E4 0.29 Artenus 1 258 0.43 0 42 Yankee Rows 282 050 the Tropn 312 0.45 155 Point Beach 1,2 844 1J8 E80 Arkamm1 342 E28 EM Nor$ Anne 1,2 000 E20 EE 0.37 Fort Calhoun 297 0.58 034 Cook 1 300 0.37 0.55 Crystal River 321 0.50 1.03 Ocones 1,2,3 1,001 0.48 0.59 Oconee 1,2,3 1.055 0.50 0.82 tusen Point 3 304 0.54 1.0 OJS Yankes Rows 355 0.49 2A5 Ranche Sece 323 0.64 053 Cook 1,2 718 0.50 0.52 Rancho Sace 412 0.48 E78 Rancho Snoo 402 0.52 1.3 0.38

• Inden Point 1*2&31071 G.77 0.84 Cook 1 338 0.43 0.45 Arkansas 389 0.28 0.93 Troien 421 0.38 0.50 cesnes 1,2,3 1,211 0.50 0.7 0 45 Three Mde lstend t 380 0.32 0.54 St. Lucie 337 0.42 058 Calvwt cliffs t,2 805 0.58 0.89 Psiiandse 424 0.32 1.47 Crystel River 3 408 0.38 0.8 0.39 Ranc% bce 391 0.78 055 San Onofre 401 0 52 1.24 St. Lucie 438 0.48 0.74 Farley 435 0.33 0.78 Maine Yanhoe 434 0.40 0.7 g.20 Genne 401 0.78 1.10 Fort Calhoun 410 OA9 1.20 North Anna 449 0.22 0.89 Salem 1 440 0.28 0.08 Fort Calhoun
• &3 0.08.

1.8 ggs Oconee f,243 1329 0.83 eJ5 Maine Yankee 420 0.88 035 Mdistone Point 2 472 0.82 0.91 Zion 1,2 920 0.88 0.86 Po,te, s11 0.38 1.8 SJB Robinson 2 455 0.72 039 Ginne 450 0.88 1.17 Crystal Rivw 495 0.43 1.09 Meine Yankas, 462 0.83 0.88 Mlueenne 2 531 0.00 0.7 0 44 Ziea 182 1003 1.28 0.73 Oconu t,283 1383 035 0.73 684 0.39 2.34 Indian Poist 1,2 911 ES2 1.90 m,heneas 1,2 1,102 0.50 1.0 SJS salem Three IJile Ishnd 1,2 1,170 0.29 4.40 St. Lucie 532 0.50 0.05 Trojan 800 0.48 0.0 gas Three Mile Island 1 504 028 0.73 Twkey Point 344 1038 0.79 1.08 Calvert Chffs 1 547 0.24 0.98 Ginna 592 0.87 1.87 Seever Valley 563 %Je 13.88 enne M6 0.71 1.8 0.45 LonI&2 W 032 W Heddom Neck B42 0.72 1.33 Indian Point 3 838 0.79 1.12 trysamt River $25 0.50 1.58 Reinneen 2 733 0.00 1.7 0.51 Twkey Point 3&a 1032 0.77 123 Sen Onefre 847 0.88 3.01 Zion 1,2 1,274 0.87 1.03 Minstone point 2 838 0.71 1.10 Zion 12 1,720 0.00 13 0.00 nt.2&3 indien Point l',2 1,279 0.95 2.23 Ft. Calhoun 808 0.75 2.78 Puhendes 902 0.42 2.2 0.41 Surry 1&2 2307 124 2.02 1&2 W 033 152 i 2 SH 132 2M Itey 643 0.52 3.05 Ginne 708 0.06 1.91 St. Lucio 020 0.83 13 ~ 0.43 Averages per Minstens 2 182f 1.14 3J2 Twkey Paint 3,4 1,880 0.84 2.07 Twkey Point 3,4 1,861 ES2 1.87 Heddam Neck 1,038 0.87 2.1 Ett reliesde 854 0.53 2.08 Heddam lieck 1,353 0.73 3.17 Turkey Point 3,4 2,251 0.77 3.4 0.51 Avarses per l Rasetor 428 0.85 034 Haddam Neck 1,161 0.95 2.35 Robimen t 1,I62 0.32 4.78 Ineman Point 1*,2 2,731 1.05 F.4 0.5 Robinson 2 1,188 0.82 2.48 Swry 1,2 3,838 0.72 8.75 gu,ry 1,2 4,344 1.13 4.7 0.77 l $ wry 1.2 3.544 E71 10.45 San Onofra 1 2,301 E78 34.53 sen Onofre 3,223 1.11 33.8 E72 i ^ Averages per Averages por Rector 10 055 1.17 fleetter $78 8.52 1.33 Rosseer est 0.01 14 0.83

• gndian Point 1 wee defueled in 1974.

IFer these sitm utth more then one operating reactor, the numbas of man-rees ser reacter is obtained by owiding the number of man-sees reported by the alte by the ausser et resceers. 2C2 is me sede of to annual soNestive dose delivesed et indleklusi deses enessmas 1.5 soms to the toest anment oosteenise does. 1 -.-...c.--.+....

TABLE 6 FIVE-YEAR TOTALS AND AVERAGES LIGHT WATER COOLED REACTORS LISTED IN ASCENDING ORDER OF MAN REMS PER REACTOR 1977 - 1981 BOILING WATER REACTORS PRESCURIZED WATER REACTORS I Total Total Average Average Total Totag Average Average Man-Workers Dose Total Man. Man-Workers Dose Total Man. Rems with per Mega-rems 2 with P" Mega-rems 8m8 2 l Site Name per Measurable Worker watt Site Name per Measurable Worker watt r Site Doses (Rems) Years grYr. Site L 3ses (Rems) Years -Yr. La '.,rosse 915 787 1.16 112.9 8.1 Prairio Island 1,2 1383 3677 0.38 4374.6 u.3 Big Rock Point 1478 2451 0.60 210.9 7.0 Kewaunee 726 1774 0.41 2189.2 0.3 Cooper 2014 2758 0.73 2610.6 0.8 Beaver Valley 1191 4735 0.25 1494.0 0.8 l Humboldt Bay 2301 1735 1.33 0.0 Yankee Rowe 1280 2748 0.47 563.2 2.3 Duane Arnold 3009 4801 0.63 1471.6 2.0 Point Beach 1,2 2587 2697 0.96 4083.9 0.6 Monticello 3067 4471 0.69 2208.1 1.4 Rancho Seco 1653 2972 0.56 2563.2 0.6 Vermont Yankee 3836 5502 0.70 2011.9 1.9 Maine Yankee 1705 3142 0.54 2948.5 0.6 Peach Bottom 2,3 9549 12978 0.74 6964.7 1.4 Trojan 1780 4508 0.39 313t.6 0.6 Ninn Mile Point 5377 6183 0.87 2148.2 2.5 Fort Calhoun 1959 3295 0 59 1637.3 1.2 Oyster Creek 6010 7581 0.79 1906.2 3.2 Oconee 1,2,3 5988 9900 0.60 8548.6 0.7 Fitzpatrick 6313 7680 0.82 2378.9 2.6 St. Lucie 2388 4696 0.51 3074.5 0.8 Quad Cities 1,2 12791 9137 1.40 51914 2.5 Ginna 2806 4063 0.69 1876.6 1.5 MillstonePoint 1 7078 9765 0.72 2347.4 3.0 Zion 1,2 5934 6477 0.92 6988.2 0.8 D,sden 1,2,3 9929 11340 0.88 5498.2 1.8 Palisades 3044 6238 0.49 2058.3 1.5 l Pilgrim 10946 12352 0.89 2179.3 5.0 Millstone Point 2 3502 4626 0.76 2877.0 1.2 Turkey Point 3,4 7650 9392 0.81 4435.3 1.7 Grand Totals and 84,613 99,521 37,242.3 Haddam Neck 4308 5750 0.75 2451.4 1.8 Averages per Reactor-year 891 1048 0.85 392 2.3 Robinson 2 5191 6502 0.80 2287.9 2.8 San Onofre 6997 8235 0.85 1198.6 5.8 Surry 1,2 15808 18198 0.87 4168.4 3.8 g Grand Totals and 77,880 113,625 62.940.3 Averages per Reactor.vear 557 184 2 0.69 466 1.2 I For those sites with more than one operating reactor, the number of man-rems per reactor is obtained by dividing the number of mantems shown by the number of reactors at the site. 2Multiple unit sites where all reactors had not completed one full year of commercial operation as of 12 31 77 are not included.

3. ANNUAL DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS 3.1 Annual Whole Body Dose Distributions Table 7 summarizes the distribution of the annual whole body doses received by workers at commercial LWRs during each of the years 1969 through 1981. This distribution is the sum of the annual dose distri-butions reported by each licensed nuclear facility each year. The distribution reported by each facility for 1981 is shown in Appendix B. From Table 7, one can see that prior to 1973 the reports had a different format such that there were only two dose ranges, 0.0 to 1.25 rems and 1.25 to 2.0 rees, for doses less than two rens. This did not allow an estimate of the collective dose, as previously described, to be made for these years. For the years after 1972, the table indicates that the annual collective dose increased nearly every year, as did the number of monitored individuals. However, the values of CR show that the portion of the collective dose due to individual doses greater than 1.5 rems has decreased from a high of 0.72 in 1973 and has leveled off at about 0.55 for the last few years. The data for 1981 is graphically displayed in Figure 5 by plotting the log of the annual dose against the cumulative percent on a probability axis. If the data were log-normally distributed, as has even found to be the case for certain dose ranges (Ref. 11), the data points would form a straight line. However, distributions in which there are annual doses that exceed 2 rems frequently depart from a straight line because of the licensees' efforts to meet various recommendations and limits. The curves in Figure 5 show the cumulative distribution of the number of workers receiving measurable doses that were reported in various dose ranges (shown in Table 7) for all LWRs and for BWRs and PWRs, separately, (as shown in Appendix B). From these curves it can be quickly :een that at all LWRs about 76% of the workers received annual doses that were less than one rem, and that about 99.7% of them received doses less than five rems. The position of the curve for PWRs (above that of the curve for BWRs) at doses less than four rems indicates that a larger portion of the workers at PWRs received lower individual doses than at BWRs. For doses greater than four rems, the situation reversed. Also, using the curves in Figure 5 and the values of CR s:iown at the bottom of the figure, one can determine that the 14% of the workers at LWRs whose dose exceeded 1.5 rems received 54% of the collective dose in 1981. The compilation of the distribution data submitted by each facility into one report, however, introduces an additional source of error. Since individuals are not identified in the annual distribution reports, an individual who was monitored by five different reactor facilities would have been counted once on each facility's report. Therefore, when the data were summed to determine the total number of individuals monitored by all facilities, this person would have been counted as five individuals rather than as one. This could affect the distribution of doses as well as the number of individuals and their average dose, because the indi-vidual would have been counted five times in the lower dose ranges rather than one time in a higher range in which his actual accumulated dose (the sum of his doses incurred at each facility) would have placed him. Further discussion of this is provided in Section 4.3.4. 16

TABLE 7' SUMUUff DETRBUTIUlf UF MNNURL WHOEE BODY DOM AY COMMERt2 U6HI WATER BOOLED REACTOM 1969-1981 Number of Individuals with Whole Body Exposures in the Indic5ted Ranges (Rems) " Annual Number No Measurable Measurable 0.10-0.25-0.50-0.75-1.0-2.0-3.0-4.0-5.0 6.0-7.0-8.0-9.0 10.0 Doses CR Exposure <0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 (Man-roms) 0.0 1.25 1.25-2.0 1969 2,479 128 134 65 25 5 2 2,838 1970 6,839 146 166 163 88 98 8 1 7,509 1971 8,586 410 315 137 105 17 11 9,581 1972 14,095 688 532 199 111 46 21 9 6 6 15,713 1973 19,043 5,494 1,698 1,214 740 652 2,468 1,584 422 251 125 71 38 16 7 33,823 13,903 0.72 Y j 1974 20,472 6,735 2,887 2,056 1,182 906 2,503 1,376 471 226 86 30 6 38,938 13,722 0.63 l 1975 18,854 8,841 3,674 2,750 1,685 1,339 3,948 1,872 691 423 169 60 24 12 1 44,343 20,879 0.65 1976 25,704 12,821 5,130 4,135 2,520 2,030 4,880 2,354 789 487 188 70 26 11 5 1 61,151 26,433 0.62 1977 24,868 13,970 6,534 5,050 3,258 2,486 6,162 2,837 1,130 569 141 66 36 21 6 67,134 32,511 0.61 1978 30,143 16,639 6,943 5,504 3,399 2,498 6,405 2,969 1,080 418 67 26 8 76,121 31,804 0.50 1979 41,191 24,512 9,8 81 8,090 5,147 3,426 7,898 3,306 1,255 477 86 28 13 2 (11 12: 105,313 39,981 0.54 1 1980 47,377 29,638 11,750 9,820 6,082 4,518 11,474 4,515 1,537 686 192 98 18 3 127,708 53,796 0.56 b12) 1981 42,323 29,332 12,217 10.326 6,625 4,903 11,766 4,546 1,793 486 93 81 11 2 1 g 124,506 54,142 0.55 Summary of reports submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 20.407 by plants that had been in commercial operation for at least one full year as of December 31 of each of the indicated years.

• The collective dose and CR were not reported by the facilities but were calculated by the NRC staff using methods described in this document.

CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose.

FIGURE 5 CUMULATIVE PERCENT OF ANNUAL INDIVIDUAL DOLES 1981 99.99 99.9 99.8 99.5 ~ gg 98 95 go 80 E 70 8 5 60 n. e 50 b 40} a b 30'- CR ~~ O 1981 1980 20 A!! LWRs 0.54 0.56 BWRs 0.57 0.63 PWRs 0.52 0.47 10 I l I I I I III I I I I I I I I-S ~ o o o P o P o @ -' M u

• M ** !* 8 o

m w a ai m u be en o o o 6 Annual Dose (rems) NOTE: Each point on the curves represents the cumulative percentage of workers with medsurable doses who received doses less than the indicated annual dose. CR is the ratio of the annual collective dose delivered at individual doses exceeding 1.5 rems to the total annual collective dose. 18

3. 2 Dose Distributions by Work and Job Function Tables 8, 9 and 10 summacize the annual data submitted in accordance with plant technical specifications in a format similar to that shown in Appendix C.

The licensees are requested to record the collective doses received by station employees, utility employees, and contract workers among various prescribed work functions and occupations. The report submitted by each station for 1981 is contained in Appendix C. One should note that in some cases, the licensee data had to be modified slightly in order to fit into the prescribed categories. Table 8 provides a detailed summary of the distribution of collective dose by work function and personnel types for BWRs, PWRs and all LWRs. It shows that contract workers performing special maintenance at LWRs incur the largest portion of the collective dose. Table 9 presents a more general summary of this data for the last seven years, and one can see that workers involved in routine and special maintenance activities continue to incur most of the total cumulative dose. At BWRs (Table 8) workers irvolved in these activities received 75.3% of the cumulative dose for BWRs, a decrease of about 5% from last year's value, and at PWRs these workers received 73.6% of the cumulative dose, an increase of 3% over last year's value. The portions of the collective dose received by workers during inservice inspection and refueling at BWRs are 3.7% and 2.5%, respectively; at PWRs such workers received 6.5% and 7.0%, respec-tively, of the collective dose. Overall, contractor personnel received 68.0% of the collective dose (about the same as last yar), and the station and utility employees received the remaining 32% at LWRs. Table 10 presents the distribution of the collective dose at all LWRs among five occupations. As expected, maintenance personnel incurred the majority (70.6%) of the collective dose with contractor-maintenance personnel receivir.; more than twice as much as the station and utility maintenance employees, combined. Supervisory personnel received 2.4% of the dose, while workers in the remaining three occupations - operations, he lth physics, and engineering - received 9.5%, 8.6%, and 9.1%, respec-tively, of the cel'ective dose. The total collective dose, 48,421 man-rems, shown in Table 10 does not equal that shown in Table 8 because several sites did not provide the distribution of the collective dose by occupa-tion. Also, the collective doses shown in Tables 8 and 10 do not equal those shown in other tables in the report because they are the sum of the doses taken from the type of annual reports shown in Appendix C rather than the collective dose that was calculated from the S20.407-type annual reports. 3.3 Health Implications of Average Annual Doses If any biological effects are caused by exposure to radiation in the work place, the effects are likely to occur only after many years. The most important radiation-induced health effects are excess cancers, which can only l I be manifested years after exposure, and genetic damage, which can only be expressed in subsequent generations. A vast amount of scientific infor-mation is available from which estimates of these risks can be made. Much of this information, however, has been obtained from epidemiologic studies of human populations at levels 19

TABLE 8 ANNUAL COLLACTIVE LOSES 8I WORK FUNCTION AND PERSONNEL TIPE 1981 NORK FUNCTION STATION E5ELOIEES. UTILITI B5PLOIRES CONTRACT NORKERS & OTHERS TOTAL PAR BUNCIIOh 5&N-Rigs 5 DF TOTAL R&B-BB5S 1 OF TOTAL 315-85FS 5 0F. TOTAL BAN-RhaS. 5.Qll2cIRL EQ1 LING NaIIR_EdEI9!! BE ACTOR OPER ATIO NS & SU RV EILL ANCE 1303.318 5.2 5 126.276 0.5 5 439.353 1.8 5 1868.947 7.5 A ROUTINE BAINTENA NCE 1964.022 7.9 5 1812.172 7.3 5 6731.897 27.0 5 10508.091 42.2 A INSERVICE INSPECTION 124.246 0.5 5 80.513 0.3 5 713.329 2.9 5 918.088 J.7 A SPECIAL 8AINTENA NCE 1000.031 4.0 5 402.544 1.6 5 6839.190 27.5 5 8241.765 33.1 5 N ASTE PR OC ES SI NG 661.127 2.7 5 16.757 0.1 5 2061.513 8.3 5 2739.J97 11.0 A RE FU ELIN G 359.500 1.4 5 69.343 0.3 5 188.661 0.8 5 617.504 2.5 5 TOTA LS 5412.244 21.7 5 2507.605 10.1 1 1697J.943 68.2 5 24893.792 100.4 5 EREftElll3EE_ MATER BEM2911 RE AC TOR OP AR ATIO NS & g SURVEILLANCE 1683.055 6.0 5 130.413 0.5 5 911.842 3.3 5 2725.310 S.8 3 ROUTINE HAINTENA NCE 2380.471 8.5 5 353.285 1.3 5 5279.972 18.9 5 8013.728 28.7 A INSERVICE INSPBCTION 277.964 1.0 5 182.598 0.7 5 1360.960 4.9 5 1821.522 6.5 3 SPECIAL 5AINTENA NCE 1197.547 4.3 5 1408.865 5.0 5 9927.091 35.5 5 12533.503 44.9 A N A STE PR OC ESSI NG 379.026 1.4 5 28.036 0.1 5 479.636 1.7 5 8u6.698 3.2 A REFUELING 670.802 2.4 5 259.614 0.9 5 1009.614 3.6 5 1949.030 7.0 A TOTA LS 6597.865 23.6 5 2362.811 8.5 5 18969.115 67.9 5 27929.791 100.0 3 ALL_llSRI_llIEE_REE I911 RE AC TOR OPER ATIO NS 6 SU RV EI LL ANCE 2986.373 5.7 5 256.639 0.5 5 1351.195 2.6 5 4594.257 8.7 3 RO UTIN E HA IN TE N A NC E 4344.493 8.2 5 2165.457 4.1 5 12011.869 22.7 5 18521.819 J5. 0 A INSERVICE INSPECTION 402.210 0.8 5 263.111 0.5 5 2074.289 3.9 5 27J9.610 5.2 S SPECIAL BAINTENA NCE 2197.578 4.2 5 1811.409 3.4 5 16746.281 31.7 5 40775.268 39.3 a N AST E PR OC ES SI NG 1040.153 2.0 1 44.793 0.1 1 2541.149 4.8 5 3626.095 6.9 A RE FU ELIN G 1039.302 2.0 5 328.957 0.6 5 1198.275 2.3 5 2506.534 4.9 3 TOTA LS 12010.109 22.7 5 4870.416 9.2 5 35943.058 60.0 5 52823.583 100.0 3

TABLE 9 PERCENTAGES OF ANNUAL COLLECTIVE DOSE 1 AT LWRS BY WORK FUNCTION Percent of Dose 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 10.8% 10.2% 10.5% 13.3% 12.2% 9.5% 8.7% nd eI n i Routine Maintenance 52.6% 31.0% 28.1% 31.5% 29.2% 35.5% 35.0% l inservice Inspection 3.0% 6.0% 6.4% 7.7% 9.0% 5.5% 5.2% l Special Maintenance 19.0% 40.0% 42.5% 35.9% 39.4% 40.6% 39.3% Waste Processing 6.9% 5.0% 5.8% 5.0% 3.6% 3.0% 6.9% Refueling 7.7% 7.9% 6.7% 6.6% 6.6% 6.1% 4.9%

TABLE 10 a#NUAL COLLECTIVE COSES BY OCCUPATION AND PERSONNEL TYPE 1981 OC CUP A TION ST ATIO N EsPLOYKES UTILITY E8 PLOY 1ES CONTRACT h0RKERS E OTHEES TOTAL Pin ISBCTION MAN-kAMS S.0F TOTAJ, MAN-Rhas 1 OF TOTAL DAN-EE5S 1 0F.2CT&L BAN -B &53 _._5. Git 20 111 JgIL IN G WARE _ BE ACTORS RAINTENANCA 2638.649 10.6 1 2105.961 8.5 5 12080.039 48.5 1 16824.649 67.6 5 OPER ATIO ES 1479.531 5.9 5 65.815 0.3 A 1620.048 6.5 A 3165.394 12.7 A HE ALTd PHYSICS 589.074 2.4 A 41.212 0.2 A 798.988 3.2 5 1429.274 5.7 A SUEERVISORY 369.107 1.5.A 73.560 0.3 5 65.301 0.3 1 507.968 2.0 3 EN GI ut ERIN G 335.883 1.3 5 421.057 0.9 A 2409.567 9.7 5 296b.507 11.3 5 TOTALS 5412.244 21.7 A 2507.605 10.1 1 16973.943 68.2 5 24893.792 100.0 A PR ES SU BIMD NATER REACTOBS MAINTENANCA 2954.180 12.6 1 1945.086 8.3 A 12452.019 52.9 1 17351.265 73.7 A OPER ATIONS 1102.054 4.7 5 64.271 0.3 1 193.752 0.8 1 1365.077 5.8 A HE ALTH PHYSICS 685.45E 2.9 A 56.998 0.2 1 1978.089 8.4 A 2720.545 11.6 5 M Sd PE RVIS CR Y 305.375 1.3 % 91.153 0.4 A 240.974 1.0 A 6J7.502 2.7 3 ENGINEERING 336.791 1.4 5 109.993 0.5 A 1006.014 4.3 5 1452.798 6.2 5 TOTALS 5383.858 22.9 1 2267.501 9.6 % 15875.848 67.5 1 23527.207 100.0 5 H L LIGHT WAHB BE ACTORS MA IN TdNA NCE 5592.829 11.6 5 4051.047 8.4 5 24532.058 50.7 5 34175.934 70.6 5 OPER ATIONS 2581.585 5.3 1 130.086 0.3 % 1818.800 3.8 5 45J0.471 9.4 5 HEALTd PHYSICS 1274.532 2.6 A 98.210 0.2 1 2777.077 5.7 1 4149.819 8.6 5 SU PE RV IS OR Y 674.482 1.4 5 164.713 0.3 A 306.275 0.0 5 1145.470 2.4 A EN GI NEERIN G 672.674 1.4 a 331.05C 0.7 % 3415.581 7.1 & 4419.305 S.1 J A TOTA LS 10796.102 22.3 1 4775.106 9.9 A 32849.791 67.8 5 48420.999 100.0 A ^ The remaining 4,402.6 man-rems of the total coIIective dose shown in Table 8 were not categorized by the Point Beech 1&2 and Surry 1&2 plants. l l l [ ___

of exposures consiaerably higher than those normally experienced in the work place. Complementary to this, information obtained from many animal and cell biology studies have greatly enhanced our knowledge and understanding of the biological effects of ionizing radiation. Although using this information to estimate risks in the work place introduces uncertainties, these uncertainties can be dealt with in such a manner that the risk is not likely to be underestimated. Thus, the discussion below is likely to overstate the health implications rather than understate them. Cancer induction as a result of radiation exposure has been examined by many organizations having scientific and medical expertise in the subject. One of these, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), published a compre-hensive review of the biological effects of ionizing radiation in 1980 (Ref. 11). Based on this report, a large working population receiving one million man-rems might suffer an estimated 100 to 200 additional cancer deaths over the remaining years of their lives. This risk estimate. can be applied to the 54,142 man rems (Table 3) and the 82,183 workers who received measurable exposures. The result is that for the total work force exposed at commercial LWRs in 1981, the number of additional cancer deaths would be less than ten. These deaths would be in addition to the approximately 12,000 cancer deaths that would occur normally in a popula-tion of 80,000 workers without exposure to this amount of radiation. Perhaps more meaningful to the individual workers are the health implica-tions to the workers receiving the average dose of 0.66 rems or the maximum dose, under normal conditions, of 9 rems or so durina 1981. The estimated excess risk of dying of cancer during the remainder of life ~ is one chance in 10,000 for the. average dose and one chance in 1,000 for the nine-rem dose. The estimated excess risk for the accidental overexposure of 21 rems is one chance in 300. Should a worker receive 0.66 rems per year continuously during this entire working career his risk of dying from cancer will increase by about 2% of the normal risk. These risks can be compared to the Aaerican Cancer Society's estimates of one chance in four of having cancer and one chance in seven of dying of cancer. The potential genetic effects from a worker population receiving about 50,000 man-rems is very small compared to genetic damages that occur spontaneously in this population. Based again on the 1980 NAS report, from zero to four serious genetic diseases could be induced in first generation children of the 80,000 exposed

• workers and from three to 60 in all future generations.

This number is compared to the approximately 100,000 serious genetic defects that occur normally in one million live births. 3.4 High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor (HTGR) The only HTGR operating in the United States is the Fort St. Vrain plant near Denver, Colorado. It is owned by the Public Service Company of Colorado who was licensed to operate the plant on December 21, 1973. The 330 MWe (net) rated plant achieved initial criticality on January 31, 1974, and began generating electricity in December 1976. However, the plant did not declare commercial operability until July 1,1979 and during 1981 it was still restricted to a 70% power level, except for testing.

• Assuming that, on the average, each exposed person will have one child in the future.

23 i

As shown in Table 11, annual whole body doses incurred by workers at the plant have been minimal. In 1981, everyone monitored received a whole body dose that was less than 0.10 rems, and no one has ever exceeded an annual dose of 0.25 rems. The average dose per worker remains at about 0.05 rems or less. For the eight years ending on December 31, 1981, the total collective dose for workers at the site was 22.0 man-rems, and a total of 301.1 megawatt years of electricity had been generated. This yields an eight year average of about 0.1 man-rems per megawatt year. The average value of this parameter for LWRs is seventeen times as much (Table 3). TABLE 11 ANNUAL DOSES AT FORT ST. VRAIN 1974 - 1981 No. of Individuals with Annual Doses in Ranges (Rems) Average Total Annual Measurable No No. of Collective Gross Dose Per Measurable Measurable 0.10-Individuals Dose MW-Yrs Worker Year Dose 0.10 0.25 Monitored (Man-Rems) Generated (Rems) 1974 1597 63 1 1,661 3.3 0.0 0.05 1975 1263 0 0 1,263 0.0 0.0 0.00 1976 1362. 25 0 1.387 1.3 2.8 0.05 1977 945 55 1 1,002 2.9 29.8 0.05 1978 896 34 0 930 1.7 75.7 0.05 1979 1149 120 2 1,271 6.4 16.0 0.05 1980 9]2 57 1 960 3.0 83.2 0.05 1981 1C96 31 0 1,127 1.0 93.6 0.03 24 m. ,..,; : s g.,,., _, _, u,._ _.. y, y _. ; q _.,. _ _, _. _,..

4. TERMINATION DATA SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 920.408 4.1 Termination Reports, 1969-1980 In 1969 the NRC (then the Atomic Energy Commission) began requiring operating nuclear power facilities and three other types of licensees

• to submit personnel identification and exposure information upon the termina-tion of each monitored person's employment or work assignment in the licensee's facility.

The appropriate information on each report is manually coded'and entered into the Commission's computerized Radiation Exposure information and Reporting System (REIRS) at Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The data are retrievable through numerous ways - social security number, name, facility, etc. which allows stact,tical analysis of the data, as well as the tracing of individual dose histories. During the years that this information has been collected, some 680,000 termination records have been received for approximately 210,000 individuals who have been reported as having terminated their employment at nuclear power plants. The figures given for the number of reports and the number'of individuals are different because numerous individuals have been terminated more than once over the years and because some individuals may have had external doses reported for more than one part of the body, as well as estimates of internal depositions of radioactive material, each of which is counted as one record. Tabie 12 provides a breakdown of this information for individuals terminating during each of the thirteen years and shows that the number cf such records continues to increase each year. This indi-cates a grownig industry need for workers even though the number of operating reactors is increasing very slowly. 4.2 Limitations of the Termination Data When examining or using the statistics shown in th( report that are based on the termination data, one should keep in mind that these data have various limitations, such as the following: soma licensees submit a termination report for each monitored non-utility eaphyee at the end of each monitoring period rather than wai: 'ng until the individual actually leaves the facility; the period (s) o exposure that are reported for terminating individus1s may indicate che monitoring period during which he may have own exposed to radiation rather than the actual dates of exposure; some licensees report cumulative periods of exposure and doses rather than the actual petiods and dose incurred during each period; licensees having more than one licensed fa.cility sometimes file a termina-tion report when the individual leaves-the second facility that includes the dase which he incurred at the first facility which had already been reported. Although attempts have been made to correct for some of these problems, they are still an additional source of error in any statistics developed from the termination data. 4.3 Transient Workers per Calendar Quarter One use that is being made of the information contained in the termination reports is the examination of the doses being received by short-term A Industrial radiographers; fuel processors, fabricators, and reprocessors; and manufacturers ano distributors o% specified quantities of byproduct material. ~ 25

E l e TABLE 12 TERMINATION REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR REACTOR PERSONNEL 1969 - 1981 5 I E Number of Number of E Termination Terminating 5 Year Records Individuals F 1969 790 730 j 1970 2,130 1,910 1971 2,350 2,200 [ 1972 4,500 3,890 g 1973 11,530 9,070 k 1974 16,950 11,600 k 1975 38,380 22,630 1976 63,590 35,290 1977 80,400 36,550 1 1978 84,540 37,100 f 1979* 114,250* 47,900* 1980* 158,580* 64,510* 1981** 104,920** 45,120** A Data for these years were updated based on more recent compilations. nn All of the termination data for individuals terminating d *ing 1981 has not yet been et { into the REIR System. workers. Since nearly half of the termination reports indicated periods of exposure that were less than 90 days, it is possible that several thousand individuals could have been employed by two or more licensees during the same calendar quarter. Thus, in this report, a " transient" L worker is defined to be a radiation wurker who began and terminated E employment at two or more different licensed facilities within one calendar quarter. This allows one to examine the doses of those workers most likely to approach the quarterly limits without their employer's knowledge since they move so rapidly among facilities. Table 13 displays some of the information gathered from these termination reports that were submitted by the license.d nuclear power facilities. The number of these workers has increased more than twentyfold during the g five years 1972 through 1976, but now appears to be increasing at a much 26 ?

m TABLE 13 TRANSIENT WORKERS PER CALENDAR QUARTER AT N;.'M EAR POWER FACILITIES 1972 -1981* No. of No. of Workers Collective Average lear Commercial Terminated by Does Does i Reactors Two or More Licensees (Man-roms) (Rems) i 1972 18 57 57 1.00 1973 24 146 123 0.84 1974 34 295 157 0.56 l 1975 44 684 493 0.72 l 1976 53 1,257 809 0.71 I 1977 57 1,435 851 0.59 1978 64 1.500 000 0.46 1979 67 I,754 802 0.46 1980 69 2,186 1,006 0.46 0 No.of Workers connective Average No. of Workers Collective Average No.of Workers Collective Average Year Terminated by Dose Dose Terminated by Daae Does Terminated by Does Does j Two Licensees (Man-rems) (Rems) Three Licensees (Man-rems) (Rems) Tnroe Licensees (Men-roms) (Rems) l l 1972 54 52 0.96 2 3 1.50 1 2 2.00 1973 133 108 0.81 11 13 1.18 2 2 1.00 1974 255 132 0.52 28 24 0.86 2 1 0.50 1975 609 427 0.70 70 62 0.89 5 4 0.00 1976 1,095 720 0.66 145 146 1.01 17 23 1.5 1977 1,271 718 0.56 147 115 0.78 17 18 1.06 1978 1,303 590 0.45 185 75 0.45 32 15 0.47 1979 1.527 647 0.43 178 130 0.73 49 25 0.51 1980 1,871 832 0.44 253 138 0.56 62 36 ' O.58 ~._..e.-,,_. l } ~' em -um e,

~. _., smaller rate. The top part of Table 13 shows that the average individual dose (which is close to being a quarterly dose for most of these workers) showed a decreasing trend in the earlier years and has leveled off at about 0.46 rees. The lower half of the table breaks down the information 4 shown in the first part and presents the doses of the workers employed by two, three and four or more different reactor licensees. One can see that the majority of these workers were reported by two different licensees during a quarter, while the smaller number of those terminated by three or more licensees generally showed higher average doses. Examinations of these records have revealed that some individuals have worked for as many as five different NRC licensees during one calendar quarter.

However, only a few instances have been found in which a worker exceeded his quarterly limit of three rems as a result of his working at two different licensed facilities within one calendar quarter.

Two of them occurred in 1980 when the doses that the workers had received while employed by the first utility were revised upward later in the year. This resulted in their receiving a quarterly dose that slightly exceeded three rems. That is not to say that no other workers' doses have exceeded the quarterly limit because the records of those who were employed by a second licensee for a period spanning the end of a calendar quarter could not be examined l-in this manner, and the records of those employed by other than four J categories of NRC licensees are not submitted to the NRC. 4.4 Transient Workers per Calendar Year Since the number of transient workers per calendar quarter comprise only i a small percentage of the total number of individuals terminating each year, it was decided to change the L.;teria such that the records of more workers would be examined. This was done by selecting the records of all individuals who began and terminated two or more periods of employment with at least two different reactor facilities within one calendar year and by summing each worker's whole body doses. An examination of this data would allow one to determine the number and average dose for these " annual transients." Tabic 14 presents the number and doses of these l " annual transients" that was found among the individdals terminating during each of the four years 1977 through 1980. This has not been done for the 1981 data because not all of it has yet been computerized. The figures shown for 1980 have been updated from those shown in the 1980 annual report to reflect the additional reports that were computerized after the 1980 report was published. One can see that the number of these workers has nearly doubled since 1977. The average dose, however, has remained at about one rem. The lower portion of the table shows the number and doses of workers that were terminated by two, three and four or more different reactor licensees during each year. One can see that the average dose of workers employed by two licensees increased to 0.91 rems in 1980, while the average dose of workers employed by four or l more licensees has continued to decline to a value of 1.85 rems. l In order to determine the impact that the inclusion of these individuals in each of two or more licensee's annual reports had on the annual summary (Table 7) for all nuclear power facilities (one of the problems mentioned in Section 3.1) Tables 15a and 15b are presented. Table 15a shows the actual distribu, tion of these transient workers' doses as determined from the above-described termination reports and compares it with the 28

l TABLE 14 TRANSIENT WORKERS PER CALENDAR YEAR AT NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES 1977 1980 No. of No.of Workers Collective Average Year Commercial Terminated by Dose Dose Reactors Two or More Licensees (Man-coms) (Rems) 1977 57 3,161 3,776 1.29

• 1978 64 3,202 3,231 1.01
• 1979 67 4,022 3,891 0.97 l
• 1980 69 5,463 6,028 1.10 l

l N l No.of Workers No.of Workers Collective Average No of Workers Collective Average Collective Average TeiW W Year Terminated by Dose Dose Terminated by Dose Dose b Done p,,,,, g,,, Two Licensees (Man-rems) (Rems) Three Licensees (Man-roms) (Rems) Lh (Men-roms) (Rems) 1977 2,166 1,987 0.92 572 842 1.47 423 947 2.24

• 1978 2,119 1,490 0.73 621 792 1.30 462 949 2.05
• 1979 2,761 2,0 97 0.76 688 805 1.17 493 989 2.01
• 1980 3,444 3,772 0.91 959 1,245 1.30 732 1,339 1.83 Figures for the years 1978,1979, and 1980 have been updated based on the latest compilations.

1

TABLE 15a ACTUAL AND COMPILED DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS OF TRANSIENT WORKERSPER CALENDAR YEAR AT LWRS Type of Distribuh I Number of Indivr. als with Whole Body Doses in the Ranges (Rems) and Total Total Avg. Ar8. Mees. Len vian u.asw 0.10-0.25-Om-0.75 - 12-2m-3m-4.00-5.00-8.00-7.00 s oo s.co 10.00 11 , Year MeannatWe < 0.10 0.25 0.50 015 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 00 6.00 7.00 9.00 9.00 10 00 11.00 12.0 0 usta Rams (Rems) (Rems) 2A individ. Man-Dose Dose Actual Gatnbution of 228 782 300 236 184 151 500 381 213 100 50 23 11 2 1.161 "3,776 1.19 1.29 Transients - 1977 ,,, a_gy 1,594 2,357 804 768 552 417 1,013 362 55 8 5 7,935 "3,776 0.48 0.60 AC'"*' **"""""""I 308 885 317 282 171 131 463 307 168 107 C 13 1 1 3.202 3.231 1.01 1.12 h Transients - 1978 Compiled Distribution of 2,079 2,423 918 788 488 382 873 262 51 11 0 2 8,277 3,231 0.39 0.52 Transients - 1978 Actual Distnbuuan of 373 883 398 35R 281 240 678 410 195 71 32 14 4 1 Transients-1979 3,938 3 888 0.99 1.09 pi Dis ht 2,130 2.676 1,259 1,048 673 460 1,040 313 46 3 1 9,649 3,8as8 0.40 0.52 b g 533 1,175 065 482 388 277 829 595 353 174 47 25 15 4 1 5,463 6,028 1.10 1.22 3.207 3,910 1,639 1,398 900 661 1,632 503 74 29 4 4 4 13,965 6,028 0.43 0.56 g g TABLE 15b EFFECTS OF TRANSIENT WORKERSON ANNUAL STATISTICAL COMPILATIONS 27,671 15.523 6,750 5,179 3.300 2,600 6.174 2,838 1,130 569 141 66 36 21 6 71,904 32,731 0.46 0.74 _ jg i C Adjusted Statsstical Distribution - 1977 26.305 13,948 6,246 4.647 2,932 2,234 5,661 2.857 I,288 661 186 89 47 23 6 67,130 32,643 0.49 0.80

• Competed Statisticat

~ Distribution - 197E 31 039 16,673 6.943 5,504 3.399 2,498 6,405 2,989 1,000 418 67 26 8 2 77,051 31,806 0.41 0.80 3 ,,"r 29,268 15,135 6.342 4 998 3.088 2,247 5,995 3,034 1,197 514 109 37 9 1 2 71 976 31,668 0.45 0,74 tion 7& [' 42,340 24,632 9,883 8,09G 5,147 3,426 7,898 3,306 1,255 477 86 28 13 2 1 106.584 39,987 0.38 0.62 9 40.583 22,831 9,022 1,400 4,7 55 3,206 7,536 3,403 1,404 545 117 42 17 3 1 100,873 39,525 0.39 0.86 D 9 t980 47,377 29,6S5 11,751 9,820 6,082 4,51 8 11.474 / 15 1.537 686 192 96 18 3 128,868 53,798 0.42 0.67 st ion 1 44,703 26,960 10.677 8,904 5.570 4,134 10,671 4,607 8816 831 235 119; 79 7 1 120,166 53,626 0.45 0.72 g abased on data submitted by all reactors, althougt all of them may not have been in commercial operation for a full year. "Collectrve dose found by summing tte actual doses reported for these workers on their armination reports. C Distribution found by subtracting the actual from the compiled distribution shown in Table 15s and then subtracting this ditforence from the compiled statstical distribution shown in Table 15b.

• Figures for the years 1978,1979, and 1980 have been updated to reflect the latest compilations.

-~ distribution of the whblo b:dy d:ses as th:y w:uld hava app:amd in a compilation of the annual statistical reports submitted by each of the nuclear power facilities. During each of the years shown, there was an increasing number of transient workers who wem counted more than once. Some individuals wem reported by as many as nine different facilities. In 1977 the 2,933 transients'that received a measurable dose were counted as 6,341 workers._ By 1980 the number had grown to . t 4,930 transients who were counted as 10,728 workers, and taey incurred a collective dose of 6,040 man-rems, an average dose of 1.11 rems, and an average measurable-dose of 1.23 mms. Table ~15b illustrates the impact that the multiple reporting of these-transient workers had on the staff's compilations of the annual statisti-l cal reports for the years 1977 through 1980. Since each nuclear power l facility reports the distribution of the doses received by workers while l monitored by that particular facility during the year, one would expect that a summation of these~ reports would result in individuals being J 1 counted several times in dose ranges lower than the range in which their total accumulated dose (the sum of the personnel monitoring results i incurred at each facility) would actually place them. Thus, while the total collective dose would remain about the same, the number of workers, i their dose distribution, and their average dose could be affected by this multiple reporting. This was found to be true because too few workers were reported in the higher dose ranges. For example, in 1977 the compiled annual reports indicated that 270 individuals received doses greater than five rems, wnile the adjusted distribution indicated that there were at least 351 such workers. This resulted in an average measurable dose of 0.80 rems rather than the 0.74 rems obtained from the compiled reports. Although the number of these transient workers has continued to increase, the number of them with doses exceedireg five rems remained at about 50 during 1978 and 1979. In 1930, however, the number increased to 92. As a result, 391 workers with doses greater than five 4 rems were found in the adjusted compilation as compared to the 311 such workers found in the compiled statistical distribution. In general, how-ever, since the number of transient workers receiving measurable doses is only about five percent of the total number receiving measurable doses during the year, their impact on most of the statistics derived from i compilations of the annual summary reports is not very great. 4.5 Temporary Workers Per Calendar Year In order to complete the examination of the doses received by the short- ) tenn workers employed at nuclear power facilities Table 16 summarizes ~ the data compiled on " temporary workers". Temporary workers were defined to be those individuals who began and ended their employment at only one nuclear powe" facility during the calendar year. The chart at the top ,} of Table 16 shows that the number of these individuals has grown durins the last few years and that there were 28,305 of them that received a measurable dose in 1980. Comparison of these figures with those in Table 15b reveals that these workers comprised 38% of the total number i of workers (74,561) receiving a measurable dose in 1980, while their i collective dose was only 30% of the total collective dose. Their average measurable dose of 0.57 rems was also considerably less than i the overall average of 0.72 rems. 31 l l ,v, -,-,-- - - - = ~. - r,- ---n 4

TABLE 16 TEMPORARY WORKERS PER CALENDAR YEAR (ledididuals terminated by renly one employer) YEAR No. of tow No. No. M WMwe Avg. b Avg. h % Reactors Monitored Mees'ble Dose Dose (Rems) Does (Rems) 1977 57 29,090 19,094 11,373 0.39 0.00 1978 64 28,864 17,110 9,821 0.34 0.57 l 1979 67 38,347 21,491 9,488 0.25 0.44 1980 69 48,383 28,305 16,168 0.33 0.57 DISTRIBUTION OF TEMPORARY WORKER DOSES BY LENGTH OF EMPLOYMENT w 1980 s, Number of Individuals with Doses in the Ranges (Rems) Total Deys of Total Collective Dose Employment Less then Mess *ble 0.10-0.25-0.50 0.75-1.00-2.00-3.00-4.00-5.00-gWen-roms) l Mees *ble 0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 10.00 1-7 9,318 1,705 138 75 66 45 129 41 1 0 0 11,518 459 j 8 - 14 762 1,937 287 195 117 66 252 81 1 1 0 3,899 865 i 15 - 21 564 801 260 160 87 43 92 27 4 1 0 1,839 ' 429 22 - 28 2,170 1,006 280 216 117 93 335 110 2 0 1 4,330 1,059 i 29 - 60 4,370 3,143 1,040 904 591 431 1,076 296 54 17 1 11,927 3,847 61 - 90 1.044 1,313 627 536 316 280 771 290 80 39 1 5,297 3,054 91 - 180 1,226 1,706 814 639 456 345 889 454 152 59 24 6,764 4,332 i 181 - 270 463 526 281 157 110 80 204 129 78 25 29 2,082 1,428 l 271 365 157 210 116 102 79 47-84 65 41 23 3 927 895 Totals 20,078 12,147 3,843 2,984 1,939 1,430 3,832 1,493 413 165 59 48,383 16p168 l 1 l

The second chart in Table 16 shows tho d:s2 distribution of theso work;rs by total len.gth of employment. This was compiled by summing each period of employment and each whole body dose that was reported for those workers that were employed at only one nuclear power facility during to 1980 and placing them in the proper range according to these totals. When using this chart, one should keep in mind that the days of employment are not necessarily continuous. For example, the worker shown as being employed from 22-28 days and receiving a dose between five and ten rems was actually exposed for about a week during each of three different quarters so that he never exceeded his three rem quarterly limit. The chart shows that very few workers received doses greater than five rems and that most of them were employed less than two months. Overall, the distribution of doses incurred by the temporary workers is quite similar to that shown in Table 15b for all workers with the exception of there being a slightly higher percentage of temporary workers in the range " measurable less than 0.10 rems" and a speller proportions of workers with doses greater than five rems. l l l l l 33 L

5. PERSONNEL OVEREXPOSURES Table 17 presents the number and types of personnel overexposures that have been reported by power reactors pursuant to 10 CFR 920.403 and 920.405 since 1971. In 1981, the number of overexposed individuals decreased sharply from last year's figure, but one of the individuals received a whole body dose of 21 rems, the second highest overexposure shown in the table. This overexposure occurred on March 3, 1981, at Commonwealth Edison't Dresden 2 plant when a contractor employee removed shield plugs during a refueling outage. The feedwater spargers had been replaced and the radiation protection procedures for this operation did not adequately cover shield plug removal. Also, the reactor vessel water instrumentation indicated a water level higher than that which actually existed. The employee did not exhibit any observable clinical effects of the overexposure. In 1980, the number of overexposed individuals was unusually high because about sixty workers were slightly overexposed during steam generator testing and repair work at. San Onofre. The licensee had failed to properly monitor the area of the body (the top of the head) most likely to receive the highest dose. l 34 l

TABLE 17 PERSONNEL OVEREXPOSURES AT POWER REACTORS 1971-1980 Sum of Number of Workers Number of Workers Whole Body Exposed to Excessive Maximum Year Overexposed to Whole Body g, Concentrations of Exposure

• ( "

External Radiation (Man-rems) Radioactive Ma*erial 1971 2 4.5 3.1 21 3 1972 16 49.7 5.1 2 2000 MPC-hrs 1973 19 61.2 4.0 0 1974 43 155.9 6.1 12 433 MPC-hre 1975 14 44.2 3.8 7 1976 20 74.3 10.1 1 248 MPC-hrs 1977 27 52.9 3.6 0 1978 9 71.1 27.3 b 1979 21 43.4 10.1 0 1980 73 266.2 4.9 0 1981 7 35.4 21 0

REFERENCES

• 1.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, " Operating Units Status Report," USNRC Report NUREG-0020, 1975, 1981. 2. U. S. Energy Research and Development Administration, " Operating History, U. S. Central Station Nuclear Power Plants,1976," USERDA Report ERDA-77-125. 3. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, " Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience During 1973," USAEC Report COE-ES-004, December 1974.* 4. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, " Nuclear Power Plant Operating ' Experience 1974-1975," USNRC Peport NUREG-0227, April 1977.* l 5. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, " Nuclear Power Plant Operating l Experience 1976," USNRC Report NUREG-0366, December 1977.* 6. M. R. Beebe, " Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience 1977," USNRC Report NUREG-0483, February 1979.* I 7. " Nuclear Power Plant Operating-Experience 1978," USNRC Report NUREG-0618, December 1979.* I l 8. " Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experience 1979," USNRC Report NUREG/CR-1496, May 1981.* 9. " Trends in Nuclear Power Plant Man-Rem Per Megawatt-Year," L. A. Cross, A. P. Cross, presented to American Nuclear Soc kty-European Nuclear. Society International Conference, Washington, D.C., November 17-20, 1980. 10. Brodsky, A., R. Specht, B. Brooks, et al., " Log-Normal Distributions of Occupational Exposure in Medicine and Industry." Presented at the 9th Midyear Topical Symposium of the Health Physics Society,1976. Denver,CO. IL National Academy of Sciences, "The Effects on Populations of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: 1980," Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations, July 1980. Available from the National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20418. AReport is available for purchase from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, and/or the NRC/GPO Sales Program, Division of Technical Information and Document Control, U.S. Nuclear l Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. l l l l 36

l l l APPENDIX A* Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary 1969-1981 'A discussion of the methods used to collect and calculate the information contained in this appendix is given in Section 2.1.

Appendix A Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Man-reas per Men-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Oose per Man-ress Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) IW-Yr ARKANSAS 1, 2 1975 588.0 76.5 147 21 0.14 0.0 Docket 50-313; DPR-51, NPF-6 1976 464.6 56.6 476 289 27 262 100 189 0.61 0.6 / 1977 610.3 76.8 601 256 28 228 111 145 0.43 0.4 1st commercial operation lj/g,- 1978 627.2 77.5 722 189 32 157 109 80 0.26 0.3 Type - PWR Capacity - 836, 858 MWe 1979 397.0 55.3 1321 369 54 315 252 117 0.28 0.9 1980 452.8 63.7 1233 342 81 261 213 129 0.28 0.8 1981 1104.7 68.3 2225 1102 130 972 843 259 0.50 1.0 .) BEAVER VALLEY 1 1977 355.6 57.0 331 87 8 79 58 29 0.26 0.2 Docket 50-334; DPR-66 1978 304.2 40.8 646 190 11 179 152 38 0.29-0.6 1st commercial operation 10/7G 1979 221.0 40.0 704 132 22 110 67 65 0.19 0.6 Type - PWR 1980 39.8 6.8 1817 553 76 477 477 76 0'.300 19 .4 13.9 'l Capacity - 810 MWe 1981 573.4 73.6 1237 229 38 191 141 87 M BIG ROCK POINT 1969 48.1 165 136 0.82 2.8 Docket 50-155, DPR-6 1970 43.5 290 194 0.67 4.5 1st commercial operation 3/63 1971 44.4 260 184 0.71 4.1 Type - 8WR 1972 43.5 195 181 0.93 4.2 Capacity - 64 MWe 1973 50.9 241 285 119 166 1.18 5.6 1974 40.7 70.3 281 276 54 222 42 234 0.98-6.8 1975 35.1 59.8 300 180 58 122 20 160 0.60 5.1 1976 29.5 50.1 488 289 82 207 105 184 0.59 9.8 1977 43.6 73.4 465 334 94 240 60 274 0.72 7.7 1978 48.5 77.9 285 175 93 82 9 166 0.61 3.6 1979 13.0 23.5 623 455 89 366 102 353 0.73 35.0 1980 48.9 79.0 599 354 16 338 9[ 263 0.59 7.2 1981 56.9 90.6 479 160 58 102 30 122 .33 2.8 BRv=.$ FERRY 1, 2, 3 1975 161.7 17.8 2380 325 0.14 2.0 i Docket 50-259, 50-260, 50-296; 1976 337.6 26.9 2207 234 0.11 0.7 DPR-33, -52, -68 1977 1327.5 73.0 1858 863 60 803 249 614 0.46 0.6 1st commercial operation 8/74, 1978 1992.1 73.5 2376 1792 4 1786 259 1533 0.75 0.9 3/75, 3/77 1979 2393.0 79.1 2689 1667 0 1667 289 1378 0.62 0.7 Type - BWR 1980 2182.1 73.6 2712 1825 4 1821 49 1776 0.67 0.8 Capacity - 1065, 1065, 1065 MWe t981 2132.9 69.5 3379 2380 100 2280 404 1976 0.70 1.1 l l e

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Sumary Mega-Unit Total Man-ress per Man-rems per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-ress Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per tor Utility (Rees) MW-Yr (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others BRUNSWICK 2, 1 1976 297.2 56.0 1265 326 15 311 222 104 0.26 1.1 Docket 50-324, 50-325; DPR-62, -71 1977 291.1 55.7 1512 1119 48 1071 782 337 0.74 3.8 1st comercial operation 11/75, 1978 1173.1 83.7 1458 1004 99 905 695 309 0.69 0.8 3/77 1979 810.0 60.1 2891 2602 97 2505 2074 528 0.90 3.2 Type - BWR 1980 687.2 52.2 3788 3870 111 3759 3098 772 1.02 5.6 Capacity - 790, 790 MWe 1981 925.2 56.9 3854 2638 159 2479 1890 748 0.68 2.9 CALVERT CLIFFS 1, 2 1976 753.4 95.2 507 74 28 46 8 66 0.15 0.1 Docket 50-317, 50-318; DPR-53, 1977 583.0 72.1 2265 547 36 511 224 323 0.24 0.9 -69 1978 1188.5 75.8 1391 500 13 487 143 357 0.36 0.4 1st cor.nercial operation 5/75, 1979 1161.0 74.0 1428 805 33 772 423 382 0.56 0.7 4/77 1980 1309.9 84.1 1496 677 15 662 402 275 0.45 0.5 Type - PWR 1981 1379.7 83.1 1555 607 29 578 378 229 0.39 0.4 Capacity 825, 875 MWe COOK 1, 2 1976 807.4 83.1 395 116 13 103 71 45 0.29 0.1 Docket 50-315; DPR-58. -74 1977 573.0 76.1 802 299 21 278 138 161 0.37 0.5 1st comercial operation 8/75,7/78 1978 744.8 73.6 778 336 49 287 139 197 0.43 0.4 Type - PWR 1979 1373.0 65.3 1445 718 45 673 454 264 0.50 0.5 Capacity - 1044 MWa 1082 MWe 1980 1552.4 74.1 1345 493 46 447 323 170 0.37 0.3 1981 1557.3 73.4 1341 655 48 607 442 213 .49 0.4 COOPER STATION 1975 456.4 83.6 579 117 30 87 19 98 0.20 0.2 Docket 50-298; DPR-46 1976 433.3 75.5 763 350 39 311 210 140 0.46

0. 8 1st comercial operation 7/74 1977 538.2 86.2 315 197 50 147 66 131 0.63 0.4 Type - BWR 1978 576.0 91.0 297 158 40 118 58 100 0.53 0.3 Capacity - 764 MWe 1979 591.0 87.6 426 221 50 171 89 132 0.52 0.4 1980 448.3 71.2 785 859 70 783 644 215 1.09 1.9 1981 457.1 71.2 935 579 63 51 6 382 197 0.62 1.3 CRYSTAL RIVER 3 1978 311.5 41.4 643 321 8

313 244 77 0.50

1. 0 Docket 50-302; DPR-72 1979 453.0 58.9 1150 495 29 466 346 149 0.43 1.1 1st comercial operation 3/77 1980 402.1 53.2 1053 625 24 601 382 243 0.59 1.6 Type - PWR 1981 490.4 62,2 1120 408 18 340 236 172 0.36 0.8 Capacity - 782 MWe

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Sunnary Mega-Unit Total Man-rees per Man-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-ress Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses reos tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) mi-Yr DAVIS-BESSE 1 1978 326.4 48.7 421 48 13 35 14 34 0.11 0.1 Docket 50-346; NPF-3 1979 381.0 67.0 304 30 8 22 5 25 0.10 0.1 1st commercial operation 11/77 1980 256.4 36.2 1283 154 4 150 121 33 0*12 0'.6 Type - PWR 1981 531.4 67.4 578 58 1 57 32 26 0.10 01 Capacity - 874 MWe DRESDEN 1* 2, 3 1969 99.7 286 2.9 Docket 50-010, 50-237, 50-249; 1970 163.1 143 0.9 DPR-2, -19, -25 1971 394.5 715 1.8 Ist commercial operation 7/60, 1972 1243.7 728-

0. 6 7/70, 11/71 1973 1112.2 1341 939 143 7%

344 595 0.70 0.8 Type - BWR 1974 842.5 54.9 1594 1662 57 1605 1.04 2.0 Capacity - 197, 772, 773 MWe 1975 708.1 S4.6 2310 3423 271 3152 2252 1171 1.48 4.8 1976 1127.2 80.8 1746 1680 228 1452 749 931 0.96 1.5 1977 1132.9 77.0 1862 1693 316 1377 693 1000 0.91 1.5 1978 1242.2 79.5 1946 1529 204 1325 619 910 0.79 1.2 1979 1013.0 74.7 2407 1800 191 1609 641 1159 0.75 1.8 1980 1074.4 55.0 2717 2105 236 1869 1093 1012 0.77 2.0 1981 1035.7 51.5 2408 2802 120 2682 1850 952 1 16 2.7 DUANE ARNOLD 1976 305.2 78.0 350 105 14 91 62 43 0.30 0.3 Docket 50-331; DPR-49 1977 353.6 78.9 538 299 36 263 220 79 0.56 0.8 1st commercial operation 2/75 1978 149.2 33.2 1112 974 59 915 932 42 0.88 6.5 Type - BWR 1979 352.0 78.0 757 275 35 240 219 56 0.36 0.8 Capacity - 515 MWe 1980 339.1 73.3 1108 671 32 639 570 101 0.61 2.0 1981 277.7 69.8 1286 790 56 734 598 192 0.61 2.8 FARLEY 1 1978 713.8 86.5 527 108 39 69 34 74 0.20 0.1 Docket 50-348; NPF-2 1979 211.0 28.6 1227 643 108 535 460 183 0.52 3.0 1st commercial operation 12/77 1980 557.3 69.3 1339 435 106 329 185 250 0.33 0.8 Type - PWR 1981 310.2 41.4 1331 511 96 415 270 241 0.38 1.6 Capacity - 804 MWe Dresden 1 is shutdown, but it is still included in the count of commercial reactors shown elsewhere in the report.

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Man-ress per Man-rems per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-ress Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Main C Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others - tor Utility (Rems) MW-Yr FITZPATRICK 1976 489.0 71.6 600 202 0.34 0.4 Docket 50-333; DPR-59 1977 460.5 68.4 1380 1080 14 1066 937 143 0.78 2.3 1st commercial operation 7/75 1978 497.0 72.1 904 909 166 743 597 312 1.00

1. 8 Type - BWR 1979 349.0 50.8 850 859 169 690 538 321 1.01 2.5 Capacity - 810 MWe 19CO 509.5 70.3 2056 2040 118 1922 1808 232 0.99 4.0 1981 562.9 74.7 2490 1425 187 1238 1072 353 n_m7 9s FORT CALHOUN 1974 294.0 83.5 327 71 24 47 0.22 0.2 Docket 50-285; DPR-40 1975 252.3 67.4 469 294 92 202 0.63 1.2 1st commercial operation 9/73 1976 265.9 69.5 516 313 28 285 38 275 0.61 1.2 Type - PWR 1977 351.8 79.4 535 297 33 264 72 225 0.56 0.8 Capacity - 478 MWe 1978 342.3 75.1 596 410 59 351 151 259 0.69 1.2 1979 440.0 95.7 451 126 19 107 47 79 0.28 0.3 1980 242.3 60.4 891 668 38 630 426 242 0.75 2.8 1981 260.9 72.3 822 458 61 397 254 204 0.56 1.8 GINNA 1971 327.8 340 430 69 361 108 322 1.26 1.3 Cocket 50-244; DPR-18 1972 293.6 677 1032 71 961 278 754 1.52 3.5 ist commercial operation 7/70 1973 409.5 319 224 55 169 84 140 0.70 0.5 sype - PWR 1974 253.7 62.4 884 1225 1.39 4.8 Capacity - 470 MWe 1975 365.2 76.7 685 538 0.78

1. 5 1976 248.8 58.2 758 636 29 607 210 426 0.84 2.5 1977 365.6 85.5 530 401 15 386 120 281 0.76 1.1 1978 386.5 80.6 657 450 20 430 98 352 0.68 1.2 1979 355.0 72.8 878 592 68 524 207 385 0.67 1.7 1980 370.5 76.0 1073 708 64 644 302 406 0.66 1.9 1981 399.0 82.1 925 655 49 606 251 404 0.71 1.6 HADDAM NECK (CONN. YANKEE) 1969 438.5 138 106 27 79 0.77 0.2 Docket 50-213; DPR-61 1970 424.7 734 6:19 463 226 0.94 1.6 1st commercial operation 1/68 1971 502.2 289 342 166 176 1.18 0.7 Type - PWR 1972 515.6 355 325 181 144 0.91 0.6 Capacity - 555 MWe 1973 293.1 951 697 544 153 0.73 2.4 1974 521.4 91.2 550 201 0.36 0.4 1975 494.3 89.9 795 703 20 683 0.88 1.4 1976 482.9 82.5 644 449 5

444 253 196 0.70 0.9 1977 480.7 83.9 894 641 59 582 440 201 0.72 1.3 1978 563.4 98.6 216 117 25 92 18 99 0.54 0.2 1979 493.0 87.5 1226 1161 73 1088 783 378 0.95 2.4 1980 426.8 75.0 1860 1353 175 1178 1076 277 0.73 3.2 1981 487.5 84.3 1554 1036 174 862 809 227 0.67 2.1

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Man-rees per Man-ress per. Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-reas Reporting-Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Centrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Oth(.rs tor Utility (Reas) Itf-Yr a HATCH 1,2 1976 496.3 83.8 630 134 79 55 4. 130 0.21 0.3 Docket 50-321; DPR-57; NPF-05 1977 446.8 66.3 1303 465 96 369 220 245 0.36

1. 0 1st commercial operation 12/75,9/79 1978 513.0 72.8 1304 248 88 160 52 196 0.19 0.5 Type - 8WR 1979 401.0 54.6 2131 582 85 497 382 200

0. 7 Capacity - 757, 767 isle 1980 1008.7 70.9 1930 449 143 306 163 286 0 3 1981 870.9 64.3 2899 1337 200 1137 792 545

0. 6 b

HUMBOLDT 8AY 1969 44.6 125 164 69 95 12 152 1.31 . 3. 7 ' Docket 50-133; DPR-7 1970 49.3 115 209 130 79 37 172 1.82 4.2 1st commercial operation 8/63 1971 39.6 140 292 114 178 65 227 2.09 7.4 Type - BWR 1972 43.1 127 253 81 172 57 196 1.99 5.9 Capacity - 63 MWe 1973 50.1 210 266 60 206 1.27 5.3 1974 43.4 83.8 296 318 103 215 1.07 7.3 1975 45.3 83.9 265 339 131 208 112 227 1.28 - 7. 5 1976 23.5 46.4 523 683 37 646 50 633 1.31 29.1 + 1977 0 0 1063 1904 24 1880 973 931 1.79 1978 0 0 320 335 13 322 145 190 1.05 1979 0 0 135 31 11 20 2 29 0.23 1980 0 0 142 22 10 12 3 19 0'.15 1981 0 0 75 9 0 12 INDIAN POINT 1, 2, 3 " 1969 206.2 298 1.4 Docket 50-3, 50-247, 50-286; 1970 43.3 1639 37.8 DPR-5, -26, -64 1971 154.0 768

5. 0 -

1st commercial operation 10/62, 1972 142.3 %7 6.8 8/73, 8/76 1973 0 2998 5262 709 4553 2847 2415 1.75 Type - PWR 1974 556.1 59.4 1019 910 _0.?9 1.6 1975 584.4 74.8 891 705 166 539 47 658 0.79 1.2 1976 273.9 34.8 1590 1950 154 1796 172 1778 1.23 7.1 1977 1278.3 75.3 1391 1070 189 881 383 687 0.77 0.8 1978 1172.3 67.8 1909 2006 260 1746 759 1247 1.05

1. 7 8

Hatch 2 was counted for the first time in 1980. bHumboldt Bay is shutdown indefinitely. It is still incicded in the count of commercial reactors. Indian Point 1 was defueled in 1975. It had a capacity of 265 MWe. It-is still included in the count of commercial reactors. " Indian Point 3 was purchased by a different utility and now reports separately.

1 Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Man-reas per Man-reas per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-rees Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor abit; Doses rems tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) MW-Yr INDIAN POINT 1,* 2 1979 574.0 35.7 1349 1279 209 1070 612 667 0.95 2.2 Docket 50-3, 50-247, 1980 510.8 32.3 1577 971 18} 700 398 573 0.62 1.9 DPR-5, -26 1981 367.5 23.0 2595 2731 23 2494 1595 1137 1.05 7.4 1st commercial operation 10/62, 8/73 Type - PWR Capacity - 0,864 MWe INDIAN POINT 3** 1979 568.0 66.5 808 636 63 573 482 154 0.79 1.1 Docket 50-286; DPR-64 1980 367.3 53.2 977 308 47 261 210 98 0.32 0.8 1st connercial operation 8/76 1981 365.8 59.8 677 364 46 318 255 109 0.54 1.0 Type - PWR Capacity - 965 MWe l KEWAUNEE 1975 401.9 88.2 104 28 1 27 12 16 0.27 0.1 Docket 50-305; DPR-43 1976 405.9 78.9 381 270 16 254 193 77 0.71 0.7 1st commercial operation 6/74 1977 425.0 79.9 312 139 8 131 76 63 0.44 0.3 Type - PWR 1978 466.6 89.5 335 154 11 143 89 65 0.46 0.3 Capacity - 512 MWe 1979 412.0 79.0 343 127 6 121 79 48 0.37 0.3 1980 433.8 82.1 401 165 7 158 103 62 0.41 0.4 1981 451.8 86.7 383 141 7 134 94 47 0.37 0.3 ) LACROSSE 1970 15.3 111 40 71

7. 2 1

Docket 50-409; DPR-45 1971 33.1 218 158 0.72 4.8 1st commercial operation 11/69 1972 29.2 151 172 1.14 5.9 Type - BWR 1973 24.4 157 221 1.41 9.1 Capacity - 48 MWe 1974 37.9 81.0 115 139 89 50 6 133 1.21 3.7 1975 32.0 69.6 165 234 1.42 7.3 1976 21.2 47.6 118 111 40 71 6 105 0.94 5.2 1977 11.3 33.7 141 224 60 164. 8 216 1.59 19.8 1978 21.6 62.0 182 164 69 95 6 158 0.90

7. 6 1979 24.0 71.8 153 186 65 121 21 165 1.22 7.7 1980 26.4 68.5 124 218 63 155 11 207 1.76 8.3 1981 29.6 76.0 187 123 62 61 3

120 0.66 4.2

• INOIAN POINT 1 was defueled in 1975. It had a capacity of 265 MWe.
  • INDIAN POINT 3 was purcha:ed by a different utility and now reports separately.

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Sumary Mega-l Unit Total Man-rees per Man-ress per Average I watt- ' Availa-Personnel Oc',al Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-rees Reporting Oraanization Year Year bility With Measur-tian-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) 18f-Yr MAINE YANKEE 1973 408.7 782 117 59 58 0.15 0.3 Docket 50-309; DPR-36 1974 432.6 68.7 619 420 64 356 188 232 0.68 1.0 1st commercial operation 12/72 1975 542.9 79.9 440 319 15 304 181 138 0.72 0.6 Type - PWR 1976 712.2 95.0 244 85 27 58 26 59 0.35 0.1 Capacity - 810 MWe 1977 617.6 82.2 508 245 46 199 112 133 0.48 0.4 1978 642.7 84,1 638 420 54 366 262 158 0.66 0.6 1979 537.0 68.4 393 154 70 84 26 128 0.39 0.3 1980 527.0 72.2 735 462 117 345 277 185 0.63 0.9 1981 624.2 78.2 568 424 11 413 308 116 0.49 0.7 MILLSTONE POINT 1 1972 377.6 612 5% 50 546 340 256 0.97

1. 6 Docket 50-245; DPR-21 1973 225.1 1184 663 125 538 422 241 0.56 2.9 1st commercial operation 3/71 1974 430.3 79.1 2477 1430 0.58 3.3 Type - BWR 1975 465.4 75.6 2587 2022 0.78 4.3 Capacity - 654 MWe 1976 449.8 76.1 1377 1194 54 1140 955 239 0.87

2. 6 2

1977 575.7 89.6 1075 392 118 274 159 233 0.36 0.7 1978 556.6 87.6 1391 1239 140 1099 907 332 0.89 2.2 1979 505.0 77.3 1769 1793 198 1595 1326 467 1.01 3.6 1980 405.8 69.0 3024 2158 100 2058 1864 294 0.71 5.3 1981 304.3 51.6 2506 1496 96 1400 1201 295 0.60 4.9 MILLSTONE POINT 2 1976 545.7 78.7 620 168 26 142 73 95 0.27 0.3 Docket 50-336; DPR-65 1977 518.7 65.7 667 242 38 204 153 89 0.36 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/75 1978 526.6 67.3 1420 1621 72 1549 1534 87 1.14 3.0 Type - PWR 1979 520.0 62.8 757 472 81 391 305 167 0.62 0.9 Capacity - 864 MWe 1980 579.3 69.2 892 636 76 560 514 12'! 0.71 1.1 1981 722.4 82.6 890 531 44 487 393 138 0.60 0.7 MONTICELLO 1972 424.4 99 61 40 21 1 60 0.62 0.1 Docket 50-263; DPR-22 1973 389.5 401 176 48 128 67 109 0.44 0.4 1st commercial operation 6/71 1974 349.3 74.9 842 349 91 258 0.41 1.0 Type - BWR 1975 344.8 72.2 1353 1353 1.00 3.9 Capacity - 536 MWe 1976 476.4 91.5 325 263 59 204 51 212 0.81 0.5 1977 425.6 79.9 860 1000 135 865 661 339 1.16 2.3 1978 459.4 87.2 679 375 62 313 165 210 0.55 0.8 1979 522.0 97.6 372 157 62 95 51 106 0.42 0.3 1980 411.8 78.2 1114 531 82 449 248 283 0.48 1.3 1981 389.3 72.6 1446 1004 101 903 756 248 0.69 2.6

m_._ _~-- t g. f Appendix A (Continued) l. Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary l Mega-Unit Total Man-ress per Man-ress per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Non-rees l Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & . Worker < per i (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) W-Yr 1 i NINE MILE POINT 1 1970 227.0 821 44 12 32 17 27 0.05

0. 2 Docket 50-220; DPR-63 1971 346.5 1006 195 43.

152 63 132 0.19 - 0.6 1st commercial operation 12/69 1972 381.8 735 '285-59 ~226 28 '257. 0.39 0.7 Type - BWR 1973 411.0 550 567 139 428 ~118 449 1.03 - 1. 4 - F Capacity - 610 MWe 1974 385.9 70.5 740 824 42 782 279 545 1.11 2.1 1975 359.0 72.1 649 681 - 68 613 203 478 1.05 1.9 4 1976 484.6 88.2 392 428 52 - 376 229 199-1.09 0.9 1977 347.4 59.2 1093 1383 41 1342 883 500 1.26 4.0 1978 527.7 95.1 561 314 59 255 26. 288 0.56 0.6 1 1979 354.0 66.1 1326 1497 106 1391 940 557 1.13 - 4.2 i 1980 533.9 92.3 1174 591 75 516-251 340 0.50 1.1 1 1981 385.2 66.0 2029 1592 144 1448 i 1064 528 0.78 4.1 NORTH ANNA 1, 2 1979 507.0 61.7 2025 449 78 371 190 259 0.22 0.9 Docket 50-338; NPF-04. - 09 1980 681.8 86.5 2086 218 128 90 85 133 0.10 0.3 + 1st commercial operation 6/78, 1981 1241.9 71.5 2416 680 188 492-343 337. 0.28 0.5 ? Type - PWR a Capacity - 865 Mie OCONEE 1, 2, 3 1974 650.6 60.1. 844 517 18 499

144, 373 0.61

' 0. 8. Docket 50-269, 50-270, 50-287; 1975 .1838.3 75.5 829 497 72 425 90 407 0.60 0.3 j DPR-38 -47. -55 1976 1561.4 63.0 1215 1026 65 961 219 807 0.84 0.6 + 1st commercial operation 7/73 1977 1566.4 65.9 1595 1328 244 1084 294 -1034 .0.83 0.8 9/74, 12/74 1978 1909.0 75.8 1636 1393 179 1214 340-1053 0.85 0.7 Type - PWR 1979 1708.0 67.7 2100 1001 123 878 181 820 0.48 0.6 i Capacity - 860, 860, 860 MWe 1980 1703.7 '70.1 2124 1055 117 938 162 893 -0.50 0.6 i 1981 1661.5 66.8 2445 1211-113 1098 275 936 0.50 0.7 l OYSTER CREEK 1970 413.6 95- '63 21 42 11 52 ' 0. 66 - 0.1 i Docket 50-219; DPR-16 1971 448.9 249-240 50 190 92 148 0.96 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/69 1972 515.0 339 582 150 432 167 415 1.72 1.1 Type - 8WR 1973 424.6 782 1236 195 1041 683 553 1.58-2.9 Capacity - 620 MWe 1974 434.5 70.4 935 984 166 818 162 -822 1.05 2.3 1975 373.6 73.3 1210 1140 169 971 271 869 0.94 3.0 1976 456.5 79.3 1582 1078 70 - 1008 587 491 0.68

2. 4

-1977 385.7 70.1 1673: 1614 76 1538 1048 566 0.96 4.2 1978 431.8 74.3 1411 1279 134 1145 696 583 0.91

3. 0 19Z9 541.0 85.9 842 467 95 372 135 332 0.55 0.9 19t:0 232.9 41.4 1966 1733 97 1636 1182

.551 0.88 7.4 1981 314.8 59.8 1689 917 48 869 479 438 0.54 2.9 .j I e p c r-- ~ -p--

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Man-ress per Man-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-ress Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (W-Yr) Factor able Doses rees tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) W-Yr. PALISADES 1972 216.8 78 0.4 Docket 50-255; DPR-20 1973 286.8 975 1133 16 1117 661 472 1.16 3.9 1st commercial operatio1 12/71 1974 10.7 5.5 774 627 0.81 58.6 Type - PWR 1975 302.0 64.5 495 306 0.62

1. 0 Capacity - 635 We 1976 346.9 55.2 742 696 23 673 109 587 0.94 2.0 1977 616.6 91.4 332 100 13 87 23 77 0.30 0.2 1978 320.2 49.7 849 764 52 712 173 591 0.90 2.4 1979 415.0 59.9 1599 854 99 755 360 494 0.53 2.1 1980 288.3 42.9 1307 424 191 233 312 112 0.32 1.5 1981 418.2 57.2 2151 902 167 735 737 165 0.42 2.2 PEACH BOTTOM 2, 3 1975 1234.3 80.9 971 228 0.23 0.2 Docket 50-277, 50-278; DPR-44, -56 1976 1379.2 73.0 2136 840 180 660 434 406 0.39 0.6 1st commercial operation 7/74, 1977 1052.4 58.7 2827 2036 223 1813 1374 662 0.72

1. 9 12/74 1978 1636.3 84.0 2244 1317 162 1155 709 608 0.59 0.8 n

Type - BWR 1979 1740.0 84.5 2276 1388 245 1143 717 671 0.61 0.8 85 Capacity - 1051,1035 We 1980 1374.2 66.3 2774 2302 311 1991 1596 706 0.83 17 1981 1161.8 58.0 2857 2505 273 2233 1880 626 0.88 2:2 PILGRIM 1 1973 484.0 230 126 49 77 0.55 0.3 Docket 50-293; DPR-35 1974 234.1 39.2 454 415 0.91

1. 8 1st commercial operation 12/72 1975 308.1 71.3 473 798 142 656 412 386 1.69 2.6 Type - BWR 1976 287.8 60.7 1317 2648 66 2582 2270 378 2.01 9.2 Capacity - 670 We 1977 316.6 61.4 1875 3142 146 2996 2176 966 1.68 9.9 1978 519.5 83.1 1667 1327 157 1170 895 432 0.80 2.5 1979 574.0 89.4 2458 1015 131 884 516 499 0.41 1.8 1980 360.3 56.2 3549 3626 207 3419 3076 550 1.02 10.1 1981 408.9 65.9 2803 1836 70 1766 1418 418 0.66 4.5

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Man-ress per Man-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-rees Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rees tions & Others tor-Utility (Rees) IW-Yr POINT 8EACH 1, 2 1971 393.4 164 0.4 Docket 50-266, 50-301; DPR-24, -27 1972 378.3 580

1. 5 1st commercial operc ion 12/70, 1973 693.7 501 588 72 516 1.17 0.8 10/72 1974 760.2 81.3 400 295 70 225 Si 214 0.74 0.4 Type - PWR 1975 801.2 82.9 339 459 1.35 0.6 Capacity - 495, 495 MWe 1976 857.3 86.7 313 370 58 312 107 263 1.18 0.4 1977 873.9 87.3 417 429 63 366 212 217 1.03 0.5 1978 914.4 90.9 336 320 71 249 111 209 0.95 0.3 1979 808.0 80.8 610 644 65 579 449 195 1.06 0.8 1980 727.2 82.5 561 598 60 538 420 178 1.07 0.8 1981 760.4 83.6 773 596 83 513 364 232 0.77 0.8 PRAIRIE ISLAND 1, 2 1974 181.9 43.9 150 18 5

13 0.12-0.1 Docket 50-282, 50-306; DPR-42, -60 1975 836.0 83.3 477 123 0.26 0.1 1st commercial operation 12/73, 1976 725.2 76.6 818 447 68 379 235 212 0.55 0.6 12/74 1977 922.9 87.2 718 300 73 227 60 240 0.42 0.3 D Type - PWR 1978 941.1 92.2 546 221 43 178 48 173 0.40 0.2 Capacity - 503, 500 MWe 1979 865.0 86.0 594 180 29 151 49 131 0.30 0.2 1980 800.7 79.9 983 353 40 313 141 212 0.36 0.4 1981 844.9 80.5 836 329 153 176 128 201 0.39 0.4 QUAD CITIES 1, 2 1974 958.1 72.3 678 482 36 446 0.71 0.5 Docket 50-254, 50-265; DPR-29, -30 1975 833.6 68.4 1083 1618 114 1504 692 926 1.49 1.9 1st commercial operation 2/73, 1976 951.2 73.1 1225 1651 269 1382 64A 1003 1.35 1.7 3/73 1977 970.1 84.0 907 1031 108 923 373 658 1.14 1.1 lype - BWR 1978 1124.5 88.6 1207 1618 156 1462 722 8% 1.34 1.4 Capacity - 769, 769 MWe 1979 1075.0 84.6 1688 2158 215 1943 1250 908 1.28 2.0 1980 866.9 64.4 3089 4838 291 4547 3657 1181 1.57 5.6 1981 1156.9 81.1 2246 3146 100 3046 2623 523 1.40 2.7 RANCHO SECO 1976 268.1 30.4 297 58 6 52 17 41 0.19 0.2 Docket 50-312; DPR-54 1977 706.4 77.1 515 390 61 329 248 142 0.76 0.5 1st commercial operation 4/75 1978 607.7 80.5 508 323 76 247 176 147 0.64 0.5 Type - PWR 1979 687.0 91.1 287 126 27 99 64 62 0.44 0.2 Capacity - 873 MWe 1980 530.9 60.4 890 412 110 302 281 131 0.46 0.8 1981 321.2 40.2 772 402 83 319 266 137 0.52 .1.3 i

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summary Mega-Unit Total Mar.-rees per Man-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-rees Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) MW-Yr RO8INSON 2 1972 580.0 245 215 42 173 137 78 0.88 0.4 Docket 50-261; DPR-23 1973 455.1 831 695 0.84

1. 5 l

1st commercial operation 3/71 1974 578.1 83.3 8B3 672 185 487 0.79

1. 2 Type - PWR 1975 501.8 72.7 849 1142 1.34 2.3 Capacity - 665 MWe 1976 585.5 84.7 597 715 30 685 457 758 1.20

1. 2 1977 511.5 85.2 634 455 52 403 223 232 0.72 0.9 1978 480.5 72.0 943

%3 63 900 529 434 1.02 2.0 1979 482.0 70.8 1454 1188 60 1128 794 394 0.82 2.5 1980 38T.3 62.2 2009 1852 79 1773 1379 473 0.92 4.8 1981 426.6 73.0 1462 733 45 688 51 3 220 0.50 1.7 SALEM 1 1978 546.4 55.6 574 122 28 94 32 90 0.21 0.2 Docket 50-272; DPR-70 1979 250.0 25.5 1488 584 100 484 359 225 0.39 2.3 1st commercial operation 6/77 1980 680.6 69.2 1704 449 55 394 281 168 0.26 0.7 Type - PWR 1981 743.0 78.1 1652 254 4 250 152 102 0.15 0.3 Capacity - 1079 MWe SAN ONOFRE 1 1969 314.1 123 42 10 32 5 37 0.34 0.1 Docket 50-206; DPR-13 1970 365.9 251 155 13 142 59 0.62 0.4 1st commercial operation 1/68 1971 362.1 121 50 12 38 3 47 0.41 0.1 Type - PWR 1972 338.5 326 256 29 227 117 139 0.78 0.8 Capacity - 436 MWe 1973 273.7 570 353 40 313 168 185 0.62 1.3 1974 377.8 86.1 219 71 0.32 0.2 1975 389.0 87.4 424 292 0.69 0.7 1976 297.9 70.2 1330 880 147 733 629 251 0.66 2.9 1977 281.2 63.7 985 847 77 770 451 3% 0.86 3.0 1978 323.2 80.2 764 401 25 376 234 167 0.52

1. 2 1979 401.0 90.2 521 139 23 116 65 74 0.27 0.3 1980 97.3 22.3 3063 2387 219 2168 2018 369 0.78 24.5 1981 95.9 26.7 2902 3223 100 3123 3104 119 1.11 33.6 ST. LUCIE 1 1977 649.1 84.7 445 152 26 126 92 60 0.34 0.2 4

Docket 50-335; DPR-67 1978 606.4 76.5 797 337 15 322 140 197 0.42 0.6 1st commercial operation 12/76 1979 592.0 74.0 907 438 25 413 209 229 0.48 0.7 Type - PWR 1980 627.9 77.5 1074 532 82 450 195 337 0.50 0.8 Capacity - 777 MWe 1981 599.1 72.7 1473 929 20 909 556 373 0.63 1.6

Appendix A (Cc.inued) Personnel, Dose and Power Generation Summarr Mega-Unit Total Man-reas per Man-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man ress Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Opera-Maint. Cor. trac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses reos tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) mi-Yr SURRY 1, 2 1973 420.6 936 152 0.16 0.4 Docket 50-280, 50-281; DPR-32. -37 1974 717.4 49.8 1715 884 72 812 0.51 1.2 1st commerical operation 12/72, 1975 1079.0 70.8 1948 1649 27 1622 1065 584 0.85 1.5 5/73 1976 930.7 60.4 2753 3165 444 2721 1873 1292 1.15 3.4 Type - PWR 1977 1139.0 72.2 1860 2307 348 1959 1380 927-1.24 2.0 Capacity - 775, 775 MWe 1978 1210.6 77.2 2203 1837 726 1111 1029 808 0.83 1.5 l 1979 343.0 42.3 5065 3584 173 3411 2975 609 0.71 10.4 1980 568.2 40.3 5317 3836 353 3483 3117 719 0.72 6.6 1981 907.6 59.3 3753 4244 428 3816 3040 1204 1.13 4.7 THREE MILE ISLAND 1.2 1975 675.9 82.2 131 73 18 55 0.56 0.1 Docket 50-289; DPR-50. -73 1976 530.0 65.4 819 286 23 26? 69 217 0.35 0.5 l 1st commercial operation-9/74, 1977 664.5 80.9 1122 359 15 344 128 231 0.3? 0.5 I Type - PWR 12/78 1978 690.0 85.1 1929 504 23 481 235 269 0.26 0.7 Capacity - 776 MWe 1979 266.0 21.9 4024 1392 197 1196 907 485 0.39 5.2 1980 0.0 0.0 2328 394 29 365 234 160 0.17 1981 0.0 70.0 2103 376 50 326 190 186 0.18 g TROJAN 1977 792.0 92.6 591 174 30 144 105 69 0.29 0.2 Docket 50-344; NPF-1 1978 205.5 20.6 711 319 81 238 124 195 0.45 1.5 1st :ommercial operation 5/76 1979 631.0 58.1 736 257 74 183 113 144 0.35 0.4 Type - PWR 1980 727.5 72.5 1159 421 77 344 305 116 0.36 0.6 Capacity - 1080 MWe 1981 775.6 74.1 1311 609 113 496 363 246 0.46 0.8 TURKEY POINT 3, 4 1973 401.9 444 78 0.18 0.2 Docket 50-250, 50-251; DPR-31. -41 1974 953.6 794 454 88 366 202 252 0.57 0.5 1st commercial operation 12/72, 1975 1003.7 74.9 1176 876 270 606 559 317 0.74 0.9 9/73 1976 974.2 71.2 1647 1184 89 1095 868 316 0.72

1. 2 Type - PWR 1977 979.5 72.1 1319 1036 94 942 522 514 0.78 1.1 Capacity - 646, 646 MWe 1978 1000.2 78.8 1336 1032 90 942 546 486 0.77 1.0 1979 811.0 62.4 2002 1680 E99 1381 997 683 0.84 2.1 1980 990.6 73.6 1803 1651 232 1419 1218 433 0.92 1.T 1981 654.0 46.8 2932 2251 1977 274 1854 397 0.77 3.4

• Three Mlle Island 1 and 2 are shutdown. They are still included in the count of commercial reactors.

Appendix A (Continued) Personnel Dose and Power Generation Summa y Mega-Unit Total Man-rens per Man-rees per Average watt-Availa-Personnel Total Work Function Personnel Type Dose per Man-rees Reporting Organization Year Year bility With Measur-Man-Tpera-Maint. Contrac-Station & Worker per (MW-Yr) Factor able Doses rems tions & Others tor Utility (Rees) MW-Yr VERMONT YANKEE 1973 222.1 244 85 0.35 0.4 Docket 50-271; DPR-28 1974 303.5 357 216 24 192 103 113 0.60 0.7 1st commercial operation 11/72 1975 429.0 87.8 282 153 70 83 63 90 0.54 0.4 Type - SWR 1976 389.6 77.1 815 411 36 375 246 165 0.50

1. 0 g

Capacity - 504 MWe 1977 423.5 85.1 641 258 83 175 90 168 0.40 0.6 1978 387.5 75.9 934 339 78 261 158 181 0.36 0.9 1979 414.0 82.1 1220 1170 546 624 642 528 0.96 2.8 1980 357.8 71.5 1443 1338 141 1197 926 412 0.93 3.7 1981 429.1 84.6 1264 731 121 610 408 323 0.58 1.7 YANKEE R0WE 1969 138.3 193 215 83 132 78 133 1.11 1.5 Docket 50-29; DPR-3 1970 146.1 355 255 90 165 158 97 0.72 1.7 1st commercial operation 7/61 1971 173.5 155 90 46 44 19 71 0.58 0.5 Type - PWR 1972 78.7 282 255 63 192 146 109 0.90 3.2 c.n Capacity - 175 MWe 1973 127.1 133 99 47 52 0.74 0.8 1974 111.3 243 205 99 106 0.84 1.8 1975 145.1 82.4 249 116 52 64 66 50 0.47 0.8 1976 152.2 89.8 152 59 17 42 4 55 0.39 0.4 1977 124.6 73.9 725 356 28 328 17a 182 0.49 2.9 1978 145.0 81.0 565 282 26 256 95 187 0.50 1.9 1979 149.0 81.6 441 127 16 111 52 75 0.29 0.9 1980 35.6 22.0 502 213 6 207 90 123 0.42 6.0 1981 109.0 74.4 515 302 8. 294 136 166 0.59 2.8 ZION 1, 2 1974 425.3 71.1 306 56 13 43 0.18 0.1 Docket 50-295, 50-304; DPR-39, -48 1975 1181.5 74.9 436 127 17 110 49 78 0.29 0.1 1st commercial operation 12/73, 1976 1134.9 61.9 774 571 64 507 257 314 0.74 0.5 9/74 1977 1358.6 75.0 78a 1003 43 960 561 442 1.28 0.7 Type - PWR 1978 1613.5 80.2 1104 1017 150 867 418 599 0.92 0.6 Capacity - 1040, 1040 MWe 1979 1238.0 67.6 1472 1274 168 1106 747 527 0.87 1.0 1980 1411.2 74.1 1363 920 97 823 560 360 9.67 0.7 1981 1366.9 72.'3 1754 1720 50 1670 1155 564 0.98 1.3

l v- + N APPENDIX B Annual Whole Body Doses at Licensed Nuclear Power Facilities 1981 \\ N, s \\ N t s

APPENDIX B ~ ANNUAL WHOLE BODY DOSES AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER FACILITIES - 1981 Amhet of Indeviduals with wholes Body Deses in the Fellowing Ranges (Rems) ','f-h Total wetsi anc M. hoher Wes-Pseet horne, Type w3.es. v.eer. < 0.14 - 0.25-0.50.. 0.75 1.0-2A' 3.0 4A 5.0 sA 7.0 SA eA mas wahie Tense w Empo.we <0.10 l J.25 '

3.50 0.75 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

' 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 to.es E mpo.we maandeems Arkansas 1, 2* PWRs 402 802 842 309 179 138 280 65 3 0 5 1 0 0 1 2 K77 7 ??.; 1,102 Beaver Vallef PWR 704 719 329 87 44 24 31 3 1.941 1.237 229 Big Rock Point BWR 69 317 37 43 18 17 27 15 5 548 479 160 Browns Ferry

1. 2. 3 BWRs 3.393 768 573 471 377 265 646 259 20 6.772 3.379 2.380***

Brunswick 1. 2 BWRs 1.275 1.647 539 365 222 161 431 272 168 48 1 5.129 3.854 2.638*** O Calvert Cliffs 1. 2 PWRs 950 485 353 289 207 101 105 15 2.505 1.555 607 Cook 1. 2 PWRs 540 416 224 240 167 115 147 32 1.881 1.341 655 Cooper Station BWR 997 347 89 127 83 69 164 56 1.932 935 573 Crystal River PWR 882 453 213 195 101 62 87 6 1 2 2.002 1.120 408 -, - > w. r .ep ~ - h. c .e ,d h - - '"The ase.al semesew d.as was prended in the 20.407 report and this wel.e is shown here.

',s. h w ^' ~

• s e
• da e 8

2 0 1 5 8 5 6 7 3 tR 5 0 9 1 2 5 5 3 3 o-Tn 8, 7 5 4, 4 6 0, 3, s a M 2 1 1 1 4 - e 8 8 6 1 0 2 5 4 9 e r r e u bhslabs 7 0 8 3 9 2 2 5 9 mtieao 5 4, 2, 3, 4, 8 9 rp 5, 8, uwHus N 2 1 1 2 1 2 E re 0 4 2 2 7 1 3 1 7 tomhd lab 5 8 8 9 7 5 9 8 1 e 5, 0, 8, 0, 1, 2, 0, 2, 9 ro Tu t 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 4 lc I ) 00 2 1 1 90 1 ( 00 89 j 00 78 -00 87 -s' d me R( 00 2 se 56 gnaR g 3 8 2 0 n i 00 w 45 o llo F 5 1 0 s e 2 1 h 0 1 3 8 1 8 3 ) t 00 t in 34 n s e t o n u C a m e ( D 4 3 2 4 8 1 4 9 u y 00 9 7 1 9 4 4 1 6 c 8 M 23 2 1 o d X B I is s D lo 2 0 1 4 2 0 5 1 1 i h e 4 8 9 8 2 9 6 t N n E h 00 7 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 P W 12 3 d P e A h b t n i e w se 4 5 2 8 7 d s 2 6 4 2 8 3 6 0 7 5 la e. 70 d 5 8 6 1 1 1 o d 01 1 h iv i te dn m.e I 3 0 1 8 6 2 1 8 2 h e e r fo 57 1 6 0 0 1 8 7 0 8 05 t h r g n e 00 1 1 1 2 1 2 n w b s o s m u h u f s f N 4 9 1 8 9 8 0 4 2 s la a e 6 7 7 3 5 5 0 5 7 t u 50 25 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 C v 00 R e N ht e h is 8 7 5 6 0 9 0 9 9 t is 05 9 8 5 2 0 8 2 7 9 y ht 12 2 1 2 4 1 2 4 b 00 d d e n t a a t lu o r . e0 7 1 8 2 4 7 8 1 4 lc p si ab1 1 6 2 9 3 6 7 7 1 c r a e ea 4 6 5 5 8 3 2 4 M v<0 1, i 0 r s 7 1 d 4 n e a 0 2 . e 2 6 6 r 1 / 9 8 7 8 y slu 7 7 9 6 8 2 6 2 1 h t e oabs ?rp 3, e h Nsao 9 6 5 7 6 1 3 5 t c P ux f in a E 1 e d h e t d i y v s s b o R R R 4 R R R R R r W W W a W N W W W d p P B C P' B e P P B t s r a o w pe e ~ r os z. d yn 3 a e e u v s n p 1 u e y d n le d T e l k u k lo o c c c 2 c e, s e. s I n i h e i la s m e r 1 r l N m u a B n A t a 1 e t y a s a N e e p ~C m t c s a a h s e e i 5 n l z t n d c s h r v ,e a r t r n h P D D D F F F i d t T T a t a r u a i o a a G H H E y

lllll e s el m e 9 1 4 1 3 4 6 1 a t R. 3 6 4 2 2 9 3 5 o 3 1 1 4 4 Tn 7, a 1 M 2 e E s 7 3 7 8 6 0 r r e - e bhsl u 7 g 7 8 8 6 0 9 t abs mieeo s. 6 3 1 8 5 8 uwMwp 2 2 x N E r 6 4 8 0 5 8 9 7 9 ed labne 4 3 1 9 4 0 7 9 tomoro 0 1 2 3 1 1 5 5 T uM t N 3 1 1 3 1 -00 80 1 00 88 00 78 00 ) 87 s m L e A R x ( 00 i s d e 58 n gn e a p R p 6 1 A g 0 e n 1 e i 00 w b 45 lo s lo o tr F p e 6 3 4 1 8 re h 9 2 e t 00 p n ) i 34 y t se 6 t s t 1 n n o 0 6 2 0 2 5 4 1 e o D 2 1 4 ir 2 1 2 1 2 m C y 00 e u ( d 23 h c o t o B B in d V s is X e 4 6 8 7 4 8 0 e t d h I lo 5 1 1 3 1 o i 5 0 2 2 2 6 3 r n t D h 00 N W 12 p d E P h er be P t ir A ah cs s 3 6 5 6 9 2 5 e t 5 la 9 4 2 7 8 6 as d u 70 1 1 d id 01 n o v o i

h d

te er n m e I me h f 1 2 1 7 5 5 6 7 . h n 05 o 57 6 6 3 9 4 8 p t w re 00 2 2 e g o b mi h n m a s s u s u e u e f la N R 3 9 9 4 1 0 7 h f 50 3 2 7 1 6 2 i C h a t v t 25 3 1 n s e 1 3 1 00 d R t e s N i ta s r e a h i 4 4 3 1 8 8 5 1 p t th 05 1 0 1 7 1 2 9 4 e 12 3 1 1 3 1 s y s 00 s b id awd n e a t h lu o a tr c .e0 2 7 2 1 3 9 9 8 i c p h sl ab1 s 2 0 4 0 1 0 8 7 wla r 1 e ear0 5 2 1 1 3 8 2 t c M u< 7 4 r is o 0 p d 4 e n 0 e r a 2 .er 9 3 3 2 1 1 1 9 6 0 y e 7 siu oabs 6 4 3 1 6 4 7 0 7 it h Neao 4 4 2 3 3 8 3 4 lic i Mus 2 0 t rp n E l 2 a f d d e e en h d t u n s t y o R R R R R R R R R mb r W W W W W W W W W o d p B P P P B P B P B c e r s a t a d o w e p 2 it r e t e so mly d 1 3 b la e e u u it v p y t t e 1 2 2 u c s s y a n n e e T, d t l B i i k e e o n o lo o o n n n l a n c e t P P e e a o o l 1 i l s m d e s Y t t e e m u a a l n n n s s s c n e c t N o a a u o e l l i o it a b i i a r n l l t l h h t t m d d w c i i i n i is e s n u n n e a a M M o h T fa H I I K L M M l W T P E

z_m. APPFNhff R (Fnnt i Number of Individuals with Wholes Body Doses in the Following Ran9es (Rems) gg, so Total with M Meas. Number Meas. Plant Name, Type v,eas. atwe usatwe 0.10-0.25 0.50-0.75 1.0-2.0 3.0-4.0-5.0-8.0-7.0 8.0-80-Moni-urable Totat ** Esposure <0.10 025 0.50 9.75 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 tored Esposure Man-Rems Nine Mile Point BWR 627 624 292 243 121 129 382 181 52 5 2.656 2.n?o 1.592 North Anna 1, 2* PWRs 348 1,594 265 196 100 85 122 34 15 4 1 2.764 2.416 680 Oconee 1, 2, 3 PWRs 820 945 371 338 195 138 331 121 6 3,265 2.445 1,211*** Oyster Creek BWR 218 554 322 214 168 125 233 67 6 1,907 1,689 917 Palisadas PWR 370 1.047 322 261 153 93 195 55 24 1 2.521 2,151 902 Prach Bottom 2, 3 BWRs 1,634 611 294 479 311 260 564 237 73 25 3 4.491 2.857 2,506 Pilgrim BWR 0 753 357 568 280 223 453 123 41 5 2,803 2.803 1,836 Point Beach 1, 2 PWRs 210 149 107 130 83 80 164 57 3 983 773 596 l Prairie Island 1, 2 PWRs 363 326 168 153 59 38 75 16 1 1,199 836 329 North Anna 2 was counted for the first time in 1981.

• • This item is not unusily reported by the facility and is calculated by the NRC staff using the method described in this '

t.

• • • The actual coiledive does was provided en the 20 407 report and shis value is shown here.

m @n s ^ a v 6 3 3 4 3 9 4 6 9 l e tR 4 0 3 5 2 2 4 7 0 3 6 o-4 7 2 2, 9 2, Tn 1, a 3 3 4 M e r - e r e u 6 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 bhsl t abs 4 7 6 5 0 7 5 0 1 MiWao 2, 4, 6, 9, 4, 7, 3, 7 w rp 1 us E 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 l' red 3 4 9 9 7 2 2 2 3 l i abne 5 5 5 1 2 4 1 6 6 tomor T uH t 9, 0 2, 3, 0, 3 9, 1, o 5 N 2 1 2 3 5 2 3 7 3 -00 80 1 2 00 89 9 00 8 78 1 00 7 ) s7 s me R 5 4 ( 00 s e 58 gnaR 1 g 2 1 9 0 in 7 00 1 w 45 lo lo F 2 1 5 5 1 1 4 9 ) e 2 3 h 3 2 4 1 t t 00 o in 14 n s C e s t ( o n D 8 1 0 2 0 e B 4 1 6 4 5 4 1 2 m s y

o. 0 4

2 7 5 2 u d 21 o 3 c X o I B d D N e is s 7 3 9 8 5 0 7 7 9 h E lo 0 1 7 1 7 6 9 2 8 t P P

0. 0 4

1 1 6 2 5 1 in h A W 12 d h e it b w ir s 0 6 1 3 0 7 4 4 1 sc 5 0 6 6 3 5 9 5 4 7 e la d u 70 1 1 1 id 01 do v h id e t n m I 9 4 2 3 4 4 5 7 6 re f 05 0 9 9 5 7 6 8 8 3 h h e e o 57 1 r 1 1 1 1 t e 00 g n n w b i o m s u u h 8 6 4 2 8 5 3 3 2 s N 4 3 1 3 1 3 6 7 5 f u f e 50 a 25 1 t 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 s la 00 C v R e h N t 0 7 e s 5 8 2 0 6 9 5 3 0 h i 05 7 5 8 9 4 3 8 4 2 t is 12 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 y h 00 b t d d, n s a 2 4 8 3 9 9 5 1 3 la tr u o .e0 5 9 4 2 4 9 9 4 3 la r sl c p ab1 5 1 7 1, 8 3 0, 2 5 e ea M u<0 'l c r 1 1 is 7 0 d 4 n e 7 2 7 7 6 9 9 9 2 a 0 r .e 2 sl u 0 8 9 6 2 6 5 5 5 y . abs 7 2 7 Neao 6, 1, 8 1 it e 4, 8, l h rp Mus 1 2 5 1 ic t E f in a e d s s s h e R R R R R R R R R t W W W W W W W W W y idv B P P P P P P P P b ro d p te s r a o w pe e d r s 2 n ly do a e l la e v p s u t 1 y I u i s c s o e T. t l e c 2 e 2 e o i n n i e r e l e e t S n f i i i o 1 o c 1 M is l m a N h n m O L y e2_ n m u a C o s n u t e c a t d c i e r e j i a tn a n b l n r r, o is e a u a o a a t u h1 r h hT l Q R R S S S S T T T P

APPENDIX B (Cont.) Number of Individuals with Wholes Body Doses in the Following Ranges (Rems) Number No Total with Meas. Meas. Number Meas-Plant Name, Type urabie utebie 0.10 0.25-0.50-0.75 1.0-2.0-3.0-4.0-5.0-8.0-7.0 s.0 s.0-Moni. urable . Man-Rems To tal*

• E s posure

<0.10 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.C 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 tored Es posure Turkey Point 3, 4 PWRs 1,664 710 422 446 294 213 600 175 60 10 1 1 4.596 2.932 2.251 Vemont Yankee BWR 591 435 209 167 112 92 175 62 12 1,835 1,264 731 Yankee Rowe PWR 1,575 185 63 72 55 27 88 23 2 2,090 515 302 Zion 1, 2 PWRs 445 587 163 113 140 110 339 185 79 25 9 4 2.199 1,754 1,720 l (>12) BWR Totals 15,345 11,130 4,869 4,536 2,939 2,326 5,373 2,485 911 224 32 4 2 1 50,177 34,832 25,471 PWR Totals 26,978 18,202 7.348 5,790 3,686 2,577 6.393 2.061 882 262 61 77 9 2 1 74.329 47,351 28.671 Fort St. Vrain HTGP. 1,096 31 This item is not usually reported by the facility and is calculated by the NRC staff using the method described in this documerit. The actual collective dose was provided in the 20.407 report and this value is shown here.

..n. APPENDIX C Number of Personnel and Man-rems by Work and Job Function 1981 0 ? Note: A 't' preceding a plant name indicates that the licensee's input was { recategorized by NRC staff. l

APPENDIX C ( Cont.) HUMBER uF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT 2. ARKANSAS 1.2 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSO% DEL (>100 M-REM) T0'At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONT RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CON"RACT TOTAL e WORK t J03 FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 4 OT iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 52 4 21 18.448 1.360 10.905 OPERATING PERSONNEL 53 0 0 29.756 0.0 0.0 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 22 0 73 11.996 0.0 28.067 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0 1 3.930 0.0 0.163 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 .0 2 0.193 0.0 0.487 TOTAL 138 4 97 239 64.323 1.360 39.622 105.305 e ROUTINE MAINTEPANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 88 13 159 38.537 3.575 69.835 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 12 6.409 0.0 2.961 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 5 0.0 0.0 3.202 TOTAL 94 13 176 283 44.946 3.575 75.998 124.519 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 9 28 0.146 1.174 11.487 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.130 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.142 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.132 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 1 10 0.258 0.140 2.101 TOTAL 5 10 39 54 0.676 1.314 13.720 15.710 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 45 1 446 10.894 0.112 217.348 0PERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 m o HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0 27 7.959 0.0 5.972 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.329 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 12 0.107 0.0 2.523 TOTAL 59 1 487 547 18.960 0.112 226.172 245.244 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 8 3 19 1.674 0.679 10.759 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7 0 0 1.253 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 6 4.753 0.0 2.267 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.797 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.830 TOTAL 23 3 27 53 8.477 0.679 13.856 23.012 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 75 14 457 44.414 6.035 235.472 GPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0 0 2.935 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1C 0 77 5.524 0.0 47.264 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9 0 4 2.756 0.0 1.020 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 0 61 2.859 0.0 28.184 TOTAL 114 14 599 727 S8.488 6.035 311.940 376.463 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 269 44 1130 1443 114.113 12.935 555.806 682.854 OPERATING PERSONNEL 75 0 0 75 34.074 0.0 0.0 34.074 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 59 0 195 254 36.783 0.0 86.531 123.314 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 20 0 8 28 7.483 0.0 1.644 9.127 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL to 1 92 103 3.417 0.140 37.327 40.884 GRAND TOTAL 433 45 1425 1903 195.870 13.075 681.308 _890.253

• Workers may be counted in more than one estegory.

~ APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: BEAVER VALLEY (PWEl 1981 = = HUMBER OF PERSQHNEL (>100 1-REM) T0'At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONT RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y CON TACT TOTAL e WORK 2 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEI) 1 OT iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0'HERS MAH-REMS REACTOR OPERATIOH? 3 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSOPHEL 44 0 42 2.705 0.0 2.050 OPERATING DERSONNEL 44 0 0 7.520 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0 52 1.380 0.0 10.200 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EhGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 8 0.0 0.0 0.560 TOTAL 135 q7i[ 1 10? 207 11.605 0.0 12.810 24.415 e ~ ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ~~ NAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 65 0 95 37.285 0.0 42.080 OPERATING PERSONNEL 34 0 0 1.630 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 16 1 53 1.375 0.120 12.785 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.6 0.100 0.0 14 0.0 0.555 3.350 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 2 ~- 162 281 40.290 0.775 58.215 99.280 TOTAL 115 4 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 0 0 __ 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 19 0 77 0.490 0.0 12.795 c)0PERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 " HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 27 0.0 0.0 1.605 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 2 3 0.0 0.180 0.490 TOTAL 19 2 107 128 0.490 0.180 14.890 15.560 e WLSTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 21 0 24 1.095 0.0 2.125 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 7 0 0 1.085 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 32 0.260 0.0 2.225 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10TAL 35 0 56 91 2.440 0.0 4.350 6.790 e REEMELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 0-0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 e g f0TAL BY JOB FUNCTION u MAINTENANCE PERS0HHEL 149 0 238 387 41.575 0.0 59.050 100.625 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 85 0 0 85 10.235 0.0 0.0 10.235 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 40 1 164 205 3.015 0.120 26.815 29.950 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.100 0.0 0.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 4 25 29 0.0 0.735 4.400 5.135 GRAND TOTAL 274 6 427 707 54.825 0.955 90.265 146.045 Workers may be counted in more than one category.

APPENDlX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERSuddEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTIDH PLANT:tBIG ROCK POINT (BWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERS0ddcg (>100 M-REN) T0"Al MAN-RE*5 'RACT TOTAL e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPL0ffE% ~ CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI "Y CO* STATION UTILITY 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & U'NERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 24 61 3.297 0.536 2.153 OPERATING PERSONNEL 48 2 17 18.324 0.006 0.748 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 7 to 7.287 0.038 1.260 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 25 1 0 7.025 0.007 0.0 ~ ~ 24 6.976 0.908 0.325 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 34 47 TOTAL 134 16'.._ 112 322 42.909 1.495 4.486 48.890 t LOUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 31 33 24 14.285 3.842 2.355 OPERATING PERSONhEL 4 0 2 0.086 0.0 0.012 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 2 1.088 0.0 0.169 $UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.071 0.0 0.0 j 3 0.0 0.001 0.016 ENGINEERING PERS0ENEL 0 1 31 109 15.530 3.843 2.552 21.925 TOTAL 44 34 e l JN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 10 2 0.0 1.072 0.113 i OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.025 0.0 0.0 16 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.008 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.304 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 2 10 3 15 0.337 1.072 0.134 1.543 l 1 e l SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 31 31 10.344 9.312 22.768 I m OPERATING PERSONNEL 13 0 2 0.871 0.0 0.079 N HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 5 7.524 0.0 0.292 i SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 0 0 0.248 0.0 0.0 I ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 4 1 0.068 0.077 0.019 TOTAL 47 35 39 121 19.055 9.389 23.158 51.602 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12 4 6 4.286 0.361 1.269 OPERATING PERSONNEL 23 0 0 1.164 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0 3 1.320 0.0 0.039 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.059 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNE1 1 1 0 0.031 0.004 0.0 'OTAL 50 5 9 64 6.860 0.365 1.308 8.533

• REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 19 0 0 1.131 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 9.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 0 0 0.171 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSCINEL 6 0 2 0.167 0.0 0.306 TOTAL 29 0 2 31 1.469 0.0 0.306 1.775 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 72 102 124 298 32.212 15.123 28.663 75.996 OPERATING PERSONNEL 107 2 22 131 21.601 0.006 0.855 22.462 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 42 7 20 69 17.227 0.038 1.760 19.025 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 39 1 J 40 7.574 0.007 0.0 7.581 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 46 48 30 124 7.546 0.990 0.666 9.202 GR AND TOT AL 30A 160 196 662 86.160 16.164 31.944 134.268

• Workers may be counted in more than one category.

1 APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND J00 FUNCTION PLANTtTBROWNS FERRY 1.?.3 (BWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL.(>10O M-REM) -TOTAL MAN-REti STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATIJN UTILJ YY C0 4'RACT' TOTAL I e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION ' EMPLOYEES EMPLOYlEES 8 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLtyEES 8 3"NERS MAN-REMS i REACTOR OPERATIONS 8 $URV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 47 2 1.400 19.700 0.2Je OPERATING PERSuhNEL 97 2 0 22.000 0.300 0.0 i HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 19 2 29 3.800 0.200 8.0P0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 34 47 1 6.300 16.700 -0.100 TOTAL 161 98 32 291 33.500 36.900 8.400 78.800 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 364 1352 139 141.300 1040.400 -80.900 I OPERATING PERSONNEL 181 9 4 75.000 1.200 2.900 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 56 6 53 22.600 1.000 26.400 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 L.0 0.0 0.0 i ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 66 168 52 36.200 84.300 22.600 TOTAL 667 1535 248 2450 275.100 1126.900 132.800 1534.800 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 5 4 0.0 0.0 1.800-OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 l HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.100 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 5 12 0.0 1.700 4.600 1 TOTAL 1 10 16 27 0.100 1.'00 6.400 8.200 e 4 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4 112 3 0.800 44.700 1.600 m OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W HEALTH PliYSICS PERSONNEL 16 0 3 5.600 0.0 0.700 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 26 7 168 L700 2.600 160.50@ TOTAL 46 119 174 339 13.110 47.300 162.800 223.200 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 14 0 0 3.900 0.0

0. 0.

OPERATING PERSONNEL 5 0 0 1.100 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.200 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0

0. 0 -

0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 21 0 0 21 5.200 0.0 0.0 5.200 e b REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12 58 2 2.006 13.100 0.500 OPERA".ING PERSONNEL 17 0 0 5.400 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 0 2 0.200 0.0 0.200 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0

0. 0 -

8.400 4 l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 3 25 0.100 0.600 0.0 TOTAL 32 61 29 122 7.700 13.700 9.100 30.500'~ e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 405 1574 150 2129 149.400 1117.900 85.100. 1352.400 OPERATING PERSONNEL 300 11 4 315 103.500 1.500 2.900 107.900 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL -96 8 87 191 32.500 1.200 35.300 69.000-SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 8.400 -8.400 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL v27 230 258 615 49.300 105.900 187.800 343.000 GRAND TOTAL 928 1823 499 3250 334.700 1226.500 319.500 1880.700

• Wo.kers may be counted in moso then one categosy

APPENDlX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REli BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: BRUNSWICK 1.2 (BWR) 1981 . NUMBER OF PERSOHNEL (>100 M-RRM) T0"AL MAN-RE1S STATION UTILITY CONTRAC" TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y C0 1"RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION' EMPLOYIES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYliES & 0'HERS MAN-REMS { REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. j MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5 1 0 6.762 0.157 0.356 i OPERATING PERSOHNEL 63 0 93 70.739 0.0 23.326 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 4 21 19.061 2.650 16.029 l SUPE 2VISORY PERSONNEL 2 1 2 0.467 0.301 0.428 l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 14 5 6.003 4.914 e 2.992 TOTAL 96 20 122 238 103.032 8.022 '43.131 154.185 l l ROUTINE MAINTENANCE l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 79 11 208 124.182 5.665 284.335 OPERATING PERSONNEL 16 0 0 17.649 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 2 16 13.914 1.726 13.622 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 1 0 0 0.268 0.0 0.032 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 5 17 3.827 1.658 9.055 TOTAL 114 18 241 373 159.840 9.049 307.044 475.933 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION I MAINTENANCE PERSONMEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 4 7 3 2.338 2.278 3.163 TOTAL 4 7 3 14 2.338 2.278 3.163 7.779 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 110 66 777 188.044 36.045 1091.104 g DPERATING PERSOHNEL 16 0 0 17.649 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 32 6 42 35.508 3.820 40.137 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 2 3 0.930 0.277 0.834 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 36 34 117 22.420 11.202 61.778 TOTAL 197 108 939 1244 264.551 51.344 1193.353 1509.748 WASTE PROCEESTNG MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 34 4 198 57.315 1.514 270.157 OPERATING PERSONNEL 41 0 0 45.414 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHY3ICS PERSONNEL 11 2 14 12.077 1.447 12.311 SUPERVISORY PEP.SONNEL 0 0 0 0.281 0.028 0.032 EHGIHEERING PERSONNEL 6 7 6 3.827 2.357 3.122 TOT.AL 92 13 218 323 118.914 5.346 285.622 409.882 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 00 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 228 82 1183 1493 376.303 43.381 1645.952 2065.636 OPERATING PERSONNEL 136 0 93 229 151.451 0.0 23.326 174.777 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 72 14 93 17 9 80.560 9.643 82.099 172.302 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 6 3 5 14 1.946 0.606 1.326 3.878 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 61. 67 148 276 38.415 22.409 80.110 140.934 GRAND TOTAL 503 166 1522 _ 2191 648.675 76.039 1832.813 2557.527"~

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT CALVERT CLIFFS 1.2 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-RRM) T0'AL MAN-RE M L STATION UTI.ITY CONT *AC" TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y coi 'RACT TOTAL e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYUES A h'HERS MAN-RER5 REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6 0 0 0.832 0.0 0.0 GPERATING PERSONNEL 43 0 3 15.819 0.0 0.901 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0 7 4.303 0.0 2.352 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.117 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 68 0 to 78 21.071 0.0 3.253 24.324 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 63 7 50 14.681 2.505 11.062. OPERATING PERSONNEL 16 2 14 3.353 0.347 2.993 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 12 2.328 0.0 4.859 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 3 0.327 0.0 0.591 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 7 0.308 0.0 1.315 TOTAL 93 9 86 188 20.997 2.852 20.820 44.669 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4 24 14 1.134 6.056 3.534 i OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 1 7 0.152 0.123 0.975 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.121 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.103 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 1 0.203 0.0 0.156 TOTAL 6 25 24 55 1.489 6.179 4.889 17.557 i SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 84 96 535 37.bie 30.136 233.866

• 0PERATING PERSONNEL 28 11 25 12.064 4.306 8.566-02 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0

62 6.424 0.0 24.044 SUPERVISORY PER$0NNEL 6 0 10 2.274 ~ 0.0 2.464 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 1 13 0.834 0.318 4.157 TOTAL 136 108 645 889 58.616 34.760 273.097 366.473 1 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.269 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.486 '0.0 0.0 { HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 14 30 4.470

2. 37 ';

7.758 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.317 0.0 3.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 14 14 32 60 5.273 2.372 8.027 15.672 EXEMELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 35 28 5 15.202 14.124 0.919 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 8 0 2.321 2.207 0.0' HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 2 2.026 0.0 0.462 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 6 0.106 0.0 1.112 I TOTAL 55 36 13 104 19.655 16.331 2.493 38.479"~ e' TOTAL 3Y JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 192 027) 155 015) 606 $70) .953 (812) 68.869-52.821 249.650 371.340 OPERATING PERSONNEL 104 led) 22 07) 49 Gl7? 175 048) 34.195 6.983 13.435 54.613 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 53 (38) 14 07) 112 (tel 179 061) 17.525 2.372 39.134 59.031 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 02) 0 16 Ob 30 07) 5.061 0.0 3.620-8.681 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 m) 1 (2) 27 (30) 37 (41) 1.451 0.318 6.740 8.509 GRAND TOTAL 372izrw 192 001) 810 tonn 1374 (11MH 127.101 62.494 312.579 502.174 ' Workers may be counted in more then one estesory. Numbers in parentheses are total numtprs of individuals. i =

APPENDlX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERadnaEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: COOK 1.2 (PWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) T0'At MAN-RDS 'RACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CON' RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y C0 i . WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0' iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES Ai 'HERS MAN-REM 5 REACTOR OPERATIONS 3 SURV. . MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 84 0 35 3.830 0.0 1.855 OPERATING PERSONNEL 69 0 2 28.385 0.0 0.150 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0 29 2.630 0.0 4.437 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 17 2 4 1.950 0.430 0.330 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 0 1 0.500 0.0 0.040 TOTAL 196 2 71 269 37.295 0.430 6.812 44.537 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERS0HNEL 117 0 192 85.680 0.0 33.433 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 29 0 7 1.380 0.0 0.942 HEALTP PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0 31 2.470 0.0 6.974 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 1 11 2.580 0.140 2.150 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7 0 2 0.470 0.0 0.060 TOTAL 181 1 243 425 92.580 0.140 43.559 136.279 IP-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 78 0 110 16.360 0.0 15.828 OPERATING PERSONNEL 9 0 11 1.140 0.0 3.648 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 27 0.630 0.0 6.840 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 11 0 6 0.990 0.0 0.390 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 10 0 12 1.170 0.0 2.990 TOTAL 115 0 166 281 20.290 0.0 29.696 49.986 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 82 1 425 15.080 0.140 207.965 gOPERATINGPERSONNEL 8 0 19 0.360 0.0 8.380 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 34 0.840 0.0 7.642 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9 5 24 1.65C 3.980 11.182 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 1 3 0.300 0.200 0.210 TOTAL 119 7 505 631 18.230 4.320 235.379 257.929 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 50 0 142 8.140 0.0 36.321 OPERATING PERSONNEL 26 0 to 1.390 0.0 8.244 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 0 24 2.770 0.0 1.680 SUPERVISORY PER$0HNEL 4 0 6 0.550 0.0 1.760 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 1 3.130 0.0 0.100 TOTAL 97 0 183 280 15.980 0.0 48.105 64.085 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 59 0 92 5.380 0.0 39.577 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 12 0 2 0.770 0.0 0.410 HEALTH PHYSICS FERSONNEL 2 0 23 0.050 0.0 3.120 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 0 7 0.700 0.0 1.090 _{NGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 2 0.220 0.0 0.340 TOTAL 81 0 126 207 7.120 0.0 44.537 51.657 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 470(117) 1 996 (541) 1467 (669) 134.470 0.140 334.979 469.589 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 153 (ES) 0 51 (31) 204 (100) 33.425 0.0 21.774 55.199 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 68 (18) 0 168 (36) 236 (543 9.390 0.0 30.693 40.083 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 58 (20) 8 (5) 58 (27) 124 (52) 8.420 4.550 16.902 29.872 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 40 (16) 1 21 (15) 62 (32) 5.790 0.200 3.740 9.730 GRAND TOTAL 789(240) 10 U) 1294 (460) 2093 (ES7) 191.495 4.890 408.088 604.473

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in perentheses are total numbers of individuals.

i APPENDlX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: COOPER STATION (BWR) 1981 14 JMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 1-REM) 70'At MAN-REni 'RACT TOTAL STATI ) 4 UTILITY CONT TACT TOTAL STATION UTI.I'Y C0 i e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYEES 8 OT 4ERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPL )Yl!ES & Q'NERS MAN-REMS ggACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 0 0 1.091 0.0-0.0-OPERATING PERSONNEL 43 0 0 31.431 0.0' O.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0 0 7.305 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 2 1 5.180 0.845 0.272-ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 19 5 0 12.463 0.382 5.0 TOTAL 86 7 1 94 57.470 1.227 0.272 58.969 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 52 0 197 79.467 0.0 76.115 OPERATING PERSONNEL 8 0 0 0.493 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0 0 5.780 .0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 0 1 1.072 ~0.0 0.084 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 1 14 0.751 0.003 - 2.913 TOTAL 84 1 212 297 87.563 0.003 79.112 166.678 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 13 0.0 '0.0 3.730 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.009 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.459 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 4 0 13 17 0.468 0.0 3.730 4.198 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNIL 13 0 339 8.663 0.0 260.084 $OPERATINGPERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.565 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 0 2.042 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 6 8 0.073 4.690 4.350 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 13 19 0.799 9.789 11.705 TOTAL 26 19 366 411 12.142 14.479 276.139 302.768 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.050 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 17 0 0 .3.044 0.0. 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0 0 1.887 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.014 0.0 0.0-ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l FOTAL 30 0 0 30 4.995 0.0 0.0 4.995 i e 0.0 0.0-REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 0 .0 0.579 OPERATING PERSONNEL 33 0 0 4.509 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0 0 0.830 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.411 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 49 0 0 49 6.329 0.0 0.0 6.329 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7 1 -(52) O 549 620 M43) 89.850 0.0 339.929 429.779 OPERATING PERSONNEL 104 M4) 0 0 -104 M4) 40.042 0.0-0.0 40.042' HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 56 03) 0 0 56 03) 17.853 0.0 0.0 17.853 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 16 NH 8 Ul to NH 34 GSI 6.339 5.535 4.106 16.580-ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 32 (19) 19(13) 33 131) 84 (OG 14.883 10.174 '14.618 39.675 GRAND TOTAL 279 (137) 27 501 592 W311 898 168.967 15.709 359.253 543.929

• Workers may be counted in more then one estesory. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of indiM.

APPENDlX c (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: CRYSTAL RIVER (PWR) 1981 N.MBER OF PE tSONNEL (>100 1-REM) T0'At MAN-RE4i STATI0 i . TI.ITY C0 i " TACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y C0 'RACT TOTAL i WORK & JOR Fud!' ION EMPLOYE LS E' PL0YEES A Q' 1ERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYHES A "NERS MAN-REM 5 _e REACTOR O 'ERATI 14h A SURV. MAINTEMA 4CE PE t3DNNEL 2 0 0 0.040 0.0 0.030-OPERATING PERSONNEL 26 3 0 7.770 0.730, 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 31 0 0 7.600 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.010 e, TOTAL 59 3 0 62 15.410 0.730 0.040 16.180 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PER$0HNEL 61 109 284 41.070 65.430 120.440 Z OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 2 2 5.850 0.460 0.400 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9 0 59 1.130 0.060 34.380 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 3 16 4.020 0.610 7.720 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 1 ~ ' ' ' 389 607 52.740 66.880 184.580 304.200 28 0.670 0.320 21.640 TOTAL 103 115 eIN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 10 0.050 0.050 2.500 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.150 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.380. SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.010 0.0 0.440 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 14 15 1.260 0.050 4.040 5.350 1 1.200 0.0 0.570 TOTAL 1 0 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ,e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 5 11 0.110 1.470 7.060 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 3 0.040 0.0 3.300 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 3 0.710 0.0-0.980 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.070 0.0 0.130 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 1 5 18 24 0.930 1.470 11.470 13.870 o REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 31 14 3.400 8.770 5.470 OPERATING PERSONNEL. 0 0 1 0.400 0.0 0.170 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.020 0.0 1.010 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.170 0.010 0.340 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 9 0.180 0.100 2.630 TOTAL 11 31 29 71 4.170 8.880 9.620 22.670 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 74 145 319 538 44.673 75.720 135.500 255.890 OPERATING PERSONNEL 48 5 7 60 14.060 1.190 4.020 19,270 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 41 0 67 108 9.460 0.060 36.750 -46.270 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 3 19 30 4.270 0.620 8.630 13.520 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4e 1 38 43 2.050 0.420 24.850 27.320 GRAND TOTAL 175 154 450 779 74.510 78.010 209.750 362.270 1Mostrors may be counted in moes then one catseory. - ~ 3)

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAH-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: D4VIS-BESSE 1 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-RE!1). TOTAL MAN-REE STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY C0 1"RACT TOTAL e_ WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7 1 5 0.075 0.025 0.030 OPERATING PERSONNEL 15 0 0 0.165 0.0 0.0~ HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 5 0.205 0.0 0.125 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 13 0 6 0.250 0.0 0.110-ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.110 TOTAL 41 1 18 60 0.695 0.025 0.375 1.095 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 109 17 321 10.805 0.500 24.395 OPERATING PERSONNEL 73 0 3 6.515 0.0 0.050 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 20 0 11 7.470 0.0 4.905 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 40 0 22 2.815 0.0 1.805 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 4 14 0.015 0.390 0.535 TOTAL 243 21 371 635 27.620 0.890 31.690 60.200 o IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAIhTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 1 0 0.135 0.005 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 11 0 0 0.160 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.015 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 23 1 9 24 0.310 0.005 0.0 0.315 e if_ECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 81 9 169 6.780 0.520 12.985 c) 0PERATING PERSONNEL 7 0 0 0.100 0.0 0.0 @ HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 1 0.230 0.0 0.065 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 15 0 12 0.365 0.0 0.715 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 2 13 0.0 0.150 1.025 TOTAL 111 11 195 317 7.475 0.670 14.790 22.935 o WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6 0 11 0.140 0.0 0.240 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.125 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.030 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 0 2 0.055 0.0 0.025 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 12 0 13 25 0.350 0.0 0.265 0.615 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 1 0 0.035 0.025 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5 0 0 0.035 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.020 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7 0 0 0.080 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.010 TOTAL 16 1 1 18 0.170 0.025 0.010 0.205 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 216 29 506 751 17.970 1.075 37.650 56.695 OPERATING PERSONNEL 112 0 3 115 7.100 0.0 0.050 7.150 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 36 0 17 53 7.955 0.0 5.095 13.050 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 81 0 42 123 3.580 0.0 2.655 6.235 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 6 30 37 0.015 0.540 1.680 2.235 GRAND TOTAL 446 35 598 1079 36.620 1.615 47.130 85.365

• Corkers may be counted in mcre then one category.
  • Doses are based on pocket dosimeter results.

m . APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: DRESDEN 1.2.3 (BWR) 1981 NUMBER OF FERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) 70'At MAH-RE'S STATION UTILITY CONT RACT TOTAL STATION UTI1I'Y COi "RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 OT iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYUES A "HEES MAN-Renn REACTOP OPERATIONS 8 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 0 0 33.300 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 32 3 0 47.000 1.300 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 4 0 4.000 0.400 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 0 11.700 0.0 0.0~ ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 0 1.200 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 53 7J ,[~ 0 60 97.200 1.700 0.0 98.900 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 73 26 0 218.200 36.200 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 95 0 20.900 37.300 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 26 565 0 62.700 20.500 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 17 0 0 39.700 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 53 0._. 669 21.500 0.0 1443.900 TOTAL 183 286 __ 669 1138 363.000 94.000 1443.900 1900.900 IN_-$fRVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 9 1 0 26.000 1.100 0.0 DPERATING PERSONNEL 3 3 0 4.200 1.700 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3 0 0 6.000 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERS'ONNEL 1 0 0 1.603 0.0 0.t ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7 0 21 2.600 0.0 45.600 TOTAL 23 4 21 48 40.400 2.400 45.600 88.400 GPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~ 4 0PERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12 0 0 37.000 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 17 5 0 24.000 2.100 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL y 5 0 21.900 0.700 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 0 0 13.200 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 0 14 1.700 0.0 30.400 TOTAL 48 10 14 72 97.800 2.800 30.400 131.000 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 18 0 0 55.500 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6 0 0 8.400 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 4 0 5.000 0.400 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 0 11.700 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEt 5 0 0 2.000 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 36 4 0 40 82.600 0.400 6.0 83.000 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 123 27 0 150 370.000 37.300 0.0 407.500 OPERATING PERSONNEL 72 106 0 178 104.500 42.000 0.0 146.500 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 42 '178 0 220 99.600 22.000 0.0 121.600 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 34 0 0 34 77.900 0.0 0.0 77.900 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 72 0 704 776 29.000 0.0 1519.900 1548.900 GRAND TOTAL 343 311 704 1358 681.000 101.300 1519.900 2302.200

APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERSOHHEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION FLANT: DUANE ARNOLD (BWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) TOTAL MAH-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILIlY CON"RACT TOTAL WORK & J03 FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES . 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 12 39 0.676 1.616 2.407 OPERATING PERSONNEL 34 3 7 30.218 0.292 0.129 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOMNEL to 0 75 2.482 0.0 15.248 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 13 2 18 1.395 0.283 0.511 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 11 27 0.298 2.238 1.419 TOTAL 74 28 166 268 35.069 4.429 19.714 59.212 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTEHANCE PERSOHHEL 27 48 569 20.286 21.767 296.832 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 33 7 8 18.903 6.750 0.320 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4 0 71 0.075 0.0 13.310 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 20 4 42 2.799 0.523 4.472 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 17 72 1.075 1.267 10.750 TOTAL 93 76 562 731 43.138 30.287 325.684 399.109 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 14 186 0.?35 0.969 24.560 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0 4 1.219 0.0 0.288 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0 41 7.467 0.0 17.001 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 21 6 82 0.533 0.441 4.479 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8 17 122 4.405 2.392 35.349 TOTAL 65 37 435 537 13.859 3.802 81.677 99.338 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 23 29 358 16.283 19.122 185.939 %J0PERATING PERSONNEL 27 3 8 7.786 0.930 0.220 " HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 28 0.010 0.0 1.353 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 12 2 26 2.249 0.120 2.425 ~EliGINEERING PERSONNEL 7 to 42 0.*04 0.63o 6.926 TOTAL 70 44 462 576 26.732 20.808 196.863 244.403 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 5 14 0.0 0.321 1.490 r OPERATING PERSONNEL 8 2 6 17.323 1.320 7.056 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 3 0.015 0.0 0.025 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 8 0.005 0.0 0.999 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.0 0.002 0.0 T O T A_L. 10 8 31 49 .7.343 1.643 9.570 ___28.556 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 4 to 0.020 0.518

0. 18 0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 34 3

5 4.763 0.245 0.806 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 13 J.010 0.0 0.210 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 1 3 0.670 0.020 0.655 l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 1 5 0.220 0.015 0.057 TOTAL 46 9 36 91 5.683 0.798 1.?08 jajll__ TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION 5 i MAINTEMANCE PERSONNEL 76 (27) 112 (51) 976 (500) 1164 (S78) 37.500 44.313 511.408 593.221 DPERATING PERSONNEL 150 (42) 18 (7) 38 Ob) 206 (73) 80.212 9.517 8.819 98.548 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 (14) 3 231 (101) 260 (1151 10.059 0.0 47.147 57.206 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 72 (32) 15 (9) 179 (108? 266 (149) 7.651 1.387 13.541 22.579 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 31 (9) 57 (29) 268 (153? 356 (185) 6.402 6.550 54.501 67.453 GRAND TOTAL 358 (1:M) 202 (90) 1692 (880) 2252 (1100) 141.824 61.767 635.416 859.007 7

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~

-.. _ ~ -. . - ~.. APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PER3u..4dl AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: FARLEY (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-RIEM) l1'E MAN-REP H STATION UTILI{Y 6 WORK 8 JOB FUNCTIOM EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES-~ CON"RAC' TOTAL STATION UTI :T'Y Co i 'RACT TOTAL 8 0"NERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPL )YUES 8i "NERS MAN-RENS REACTOR OPERATIONS S SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 67 0 2 2.693 0.0 0.013 OPERATING PERSONNEL 119 0 0 27.354 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 59 0 57 16.227 0.0 28.497 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 124 0 17 9.872 0.0 0.525 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 3 163 1.143 0.028 7.530 TOTAL 391 3 239 633 57.289 0.028 36.565 93.882 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 172 0 11 23.795 0.0 0.464 OPERATING PERSONNEL 68 0 0 23.313 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 14 2.044 0.0 0.385 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 37 0 2 2.698 0.0 v.080 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 5 267 0.052 0.090 23.346 TOTAL 292 5 294 591 51.902 0.090 24.275 76.267 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION w MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 0 0 0.108 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.073 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 1 0.016 0.0 0.096 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 4 85 0.366 0.460 46.223 TOTAL 17 4 86 107 0.563 0.460 46.319 47.342 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 169 0 12 80.814 0.0 2.195 4 0PERATING PERSONNEL 43 0 0 3.841 0.0 0.0 h* HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0 18 1.530 0.0 2.593 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 39 0 3 5.498 0.0 -0.107 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 8 560 0.561 0.218 135.559 TOTAL 275 8 593 876 92.244 0.2 18 140.454 232.916 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PER50r4EL 6 0 0 0.274 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNE6 13 0 0 0.437

0.0 0.0

) HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 0 7 2.516 0.0 1.933 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 0 0 1.117 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 5 0.0 0.0 0.079 TOTAL 30 0 12 42 4.344 0.0 2.012 6.356 REFUELING r MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 106 0 4 22.830 0.0 0.300 OPERATING PERSONNEL 36 0 0 2.455 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 9 0.236 0.0 0.486 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 28 0 1 2.553 0.0 0.039 i ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 0 43 0.222 0.0 12.344 1 TOTAL 187 0 57 244 28.296 0.0 13.169 41.465 TOTAL SY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 531 0 29 560 130.514 0.0 2.972 133.486 l OPERATING PERSONNEL 280 0 0 280 57.473 0.0 0.0 57.473 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 96 0 105 201 22.553 0.0 33.894 56.447 i SUPERVISORY. PERSONNEL 236 0 24 260 21.754 0.0 0.847 22.60) ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 49 20 1123 1192 2.344 0.796 225.081 228.221 GRAND TOTAL 1192 20 1281 2493 234.638 0.796 262.794 498.228 hrkers may be counted in moso then one category r

APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERS0nnEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT:tFITZPATRICK (BWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONadL_i>100 1-REM) TOTAL MAN-REMS e WORK & JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYEfS-- CONT RACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CON'RACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY 1 OT iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 88 0 142 14.000 0.0 27.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 183 0 23 62.000 0.0 2.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 25 0 73 10.000 0.0 59.000 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 34 0 35 3.000 0.0 2.000 TOTAL 330 0 273 603 89.000 0.0 90.000 179.000 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 89 0 767 134.000 0.0 238.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 74 0 13 11.000 0.0 2.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 30 0 123 5.000 0.0 20.000 TOTAL 199 0 846 1045 150.000 0.0 260.000 410.000 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 43 0 206 6.000 0.0 26.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 49 0 15 8.000 0.0 10.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 24 0 77 3.000 0.0 13.000 TOTAL 116 0 302 418 17.000 0.0 49.000 66.000 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 69 0 954 12.000 0.0 509.000 'J 0PER ATING PERSOHHEL 51 0 46 2.000 0.0 12.000 W HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING FERSONNEL 23 0 110 2.000 0.0 35.000 TOTAL 149 0 1112 1261 16.C00 0.0 556.000 572.000 e RASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 104 0 299 19.000 0.0 40.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 61 0 12 45.000 0.0 6.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0 6 1.000 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 0 52 1.000 0.0 25.000 TOTAL 184 0 369 553 66.000 0.0 71.000 137.000 o REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 e 10TAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 393 0 2308 2701 185.000 0.0 840.000 1025.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 418 0 109 527 128.000 0.0 32.000 160.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 47 0 88 135 11.000 0.0 59.000 70.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 120 0 397 517 14.000 0.0 95.000 109.000 GRAND TOTAL 978 0 2902 3880 338.000 0.0 1026.000 1364.000

• Workers may be counted in more than one category.

l " l ll PH l l e .pi-APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERSOHNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT

• FORT CALHOUN 1 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM)

T0"Al MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y COCRACT TOTAL WORK 1 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 3 0"HERS MAH-REMS REACTO.R OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINiENANCE PERSCNMEL 9 1 11 3.401 1.506 7.873 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 9 8 12 3.222 6.130 7.706 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 1 1 0 0.563 0.191 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 19 0 0 6.928 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 10 1 23 5.266 0.287 16.844 TOTAL 48 11 46 105 19.380 8.114 32.423 59.917 R.0UTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 44 45 48 24.845 26.970 25.809 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 2 10 1.338 0.968 7.100 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.040 0.005 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.251 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.070 0.010 0.108 10TAL 47 47 ((_ 58 152 26.544 27.953 33.017 87.514 IN-SERVICE I"SPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 2 1 18 1.460 0.420 11.043 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 2 7 0.0 0.284 0.202 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.015 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 3 0 0.023 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 1 0.036 0.0 0.145 TOTAL 3 4 _.. 26 32 1.519 0.719 11.390 13.628 SPECIAL MAINTEffANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 37 51 168 19.216 28.964 134.940 NOPERATING PERSONNEL 5 13 20 1.844 6.606 7.053 " HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.170 0.022 0.007 SUPERVISORY PER?OHNEL 0 0 0 0.317 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 1 4 1.257 0.130 2.258 TOTAL 47 65 192 304 22.804 35.722 144.258 202.784 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENAHLE PERSOHHEL 20 10 0 5.947 2.357 0.080 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.046 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.060 0.010 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.514 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 __ 1 2.789 0.0 0.147 TOTAL 22 10 1 33 9.310 2.413 0.227 11.950 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 24 36 42 13.963 22.987 22.887 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4 1 8 2.072 0.689 4.357 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 0 1.521 0.002 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 0 0 3.273 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSCNNEL 0 0 0 0.070 0.0 0.100 TOTAL 50 37 50 137 20.899 23.678 27.324 71.901 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 136 144 287 567 68.832 83.204 202.632 354.668 OPERATING PEP.50HNEL 21 26 57 104 8.476 14.723 26.398 49.597 HEALTH P:lYSICS PERSONNEL to 1 0 11 2.354 0.245 0.007 2.606 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 34 0 0 34 11.306 0.0 0.0 11.306 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 16 2 29 47 9.488 0.427 19.602 29.517 GRAND TOTAL 217 (100) 173 (93) 373 (253) 763 (446) 100.456 98.599 248.639 447.694 Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAH-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT

• GINNA (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM)

TOTAL MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CON lRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS A SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 121 34 130 7.276 3.146 5.579 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 26 1 0.0 12.023 0.360 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 28 13 1 4.952 5.950 0.061 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 31 15 10 1.813 3.398 0.256 ENGINEERIND PERSONNEL 33 2 11 0.736 0.205 0.290 TOTAL 213 90 153 456 14.777 24.722 6.546 46.045 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE NAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 196 33 180 79.026 22.363 142.907 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 16 0 0.0 1.045 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 13 1 12.658 7.237 0.065 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 33 12 13 7.385 3.382 5.783 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 58 2 10 35.118 0.119 8.249 TOTAL 316 76 204 596 134.187 34.146 157.004 325.357 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 39 16 96 3.508 1.405 21.816 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.0 0.005 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 12 0 1.230 1.172 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9 9 9 1.226 0.756 1.782 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 27 1 2 7.058 0.013 0.565 TOTAL 93 39 107 239 13.022 3.351 24.163 40.536 h QIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 176 34 153 87.829 6.578 39.076

• OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

10 0 0.0 0.399 0.0 N HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 11 0 8.511 2.007 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 32 13 to 7.365 1.148 0.857 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 38 2 7 6.359 0.004 0.859 TOTAL 275 70 170 515 110.064 10.136 40.792 160.992 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 25 21 21 2.519 1.248 0.227 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 10 0 0.0 0.104 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL in 8 0 0.722 0.890 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 5 0 0.118 0.017 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 3 0.007 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 40 44 24 108 3.366 2.259 0.227 5.852 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 19 36 2.715 0.830 5.438 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 4 0 0.0 2.363 0.0 tiEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 4 0 3.497 0.030 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 5 3 1.513 0.175 0.915 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 20 0 1 17.279 0.0 0.090 TOTAL 70 32 40 142 25.004 3.398 6.443 34.845 e TOTAL BY_LOjLEUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 579 (214) 157 (M) 616085) 1352(433) 182.873 35.570 215.043 433.486 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 67 (26n 1 68 (27) 0.0 15.935 0.360 16.299 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 137 (29) 61 03) 2 07 200 (43) 31.570 17.286 0.126 48.982 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 112 (361 59 05) 45 03) 216 (63) 19.420 8.876 9.593 37.889 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 179 (62) 7 (2) 34 (11) 220 Q5_) 66.557 0.341 10.053 76.951 GRAND TOTAL 10 0 7 Q40) 351 (99) 698 (211) 2056(641) 300.420 78.012 235.175 613.607__ Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PExasaaEi AND MAH-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: HADDAM NECK (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERS0dHEi (>100 M-REM) T0"At MAN-REMS e WORK & JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES ^ CONT RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y C0 4'RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI[Y & OT iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.820 0.080 0.330 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 44 2 57 49.140 0.560 13.940 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 3 114 12.230 1.750 99.450 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.010 0.0 0 0.980 0.770 0.090 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 1 ~~ 171 250 63.170 3.170 113.810 180.150 TOTAL 73 6 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 48 11 221 66.170 5.610 211.280 OPERATING PERSONNEL 10 0 10 4.460 0.290 7.650 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 1 114 7.540 0.170 72.990 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 1 5 0.0 0.320 4.140 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8 5 24 2.680 2.570 38.540 TOTAL 81 18 374 473 80,340 8.960 334.600 424.410 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 0 41 2.060 0.040 29.470 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6 0 4 2.140 0.060 2.180 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONHEL 0 0 1 0.100 0.0 0.420 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.030 0.380 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 3 3 3 2.350 2.240 0.980 TOTAL 12 3 50 65 6.650 2.370 33.430 42.450 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 20 to 186 6.910 9.400 159.190 W OPERATING PERSOHHEL 1 7 1 0.510 2.700 0.610

• HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 2

1 23 0.L90 1.350 8.530 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 to 9 0.400 3.440 7.420 TOTAL 24 28 219 271 8.710 16.890 175.850 201.450 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.490 0.0 0.020 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 3 0 0 e 440 0.0 0.060 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 1 95 26.700 0.210 46.220 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.010 TOTAL 17 1 95 113 28.630 0.210 46.310 75.150 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 23 1 105 10.940 0.420 110.240 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4 0 8 1.160 0.070 3.960 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 5 1 40 1.810 0.600 16.890 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.010 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 1 4 0.350 0.290 3.000 TOTAL 32 3 157 192 14.260 1.390 134.090 149.740 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 96 22 553 671 87.390 15.550 510.530 613.470 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 68 9 80 157 58.850 3.680 28.400 90.930 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 60 7 387 454 49.270 4.080 244.500 297.850 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 1 6 7 0.0 0.370 4.620 4.990 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 20 40 75 6.760 9.310 50.040 66.110 GR AND TOT AL 239 59 1066 1364 202.270 32.990 838.090 1073.350 Workers may be counted m more than one category.

- ~. APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: H AT CH 122. (BWR) 1981 70"At MAH-RE'iM NUMBER OF pelts 0HNEL (>10) M-REM) 'RACT TOTAL STATI )N UTI LITY CONT RAC' TOTAL STATION UTI.I"Y C0 i WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPL 3YEES & QT 4ERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLI)YlIES 'HERS MAN-RERS , REACTOR OPERATIONS 8 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 15 2 14 7.000 1.000 2.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 114 5 0 77.000 3.000 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 31 1 82 17.000 0.0 42.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 53 14 3 16.000 5.000 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 44 7 10 12.000 2.000 2.000 TOTAL 257 29 109 395 129.000 11.000 46.000 186.000

• 0UTIHE MAINTENANCE g

MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 176 4 216 101.000 2.000 42.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 52 1 0 3f.000 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 0 15 2.000 0.0 2.000-SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 2 0 1.000 0.0 0.0 l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 3 7 5.000 0.0 1.000 TOTAL 250 10 238 498 140.000 2.000 45.000 187.000

• TH-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6

0 2 1.000 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.P SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 4.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 9 0 4 13 1.000 0.0 0.0 1.000 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 150 20 889 110.000 6.000 542.000 %J0PERATING PERSOHHEL 86 1 2 32.000 0.0 0.0

• HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 1

82 4.000 0.0 31.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 3 26 1.000 1.000 6.000 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 19 6 94 8.000 4.000 29.000 TOTAL 269 31 1993 1393 155.000 11.000 608.000 774.000 o WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 15 0 39 5.000 0.0 7.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 29 1 2 11.000 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 to 0.0 0.0 2.000 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 1.000 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 0 3 1.000 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 49 1 56 106 17.000 0.0 10.000 27.000 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 48 1 39 16.000 0.0 10.000 t OPERATING PERSONNEL 55 2 0 18.000 1.000 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 10 0 46 4.000 0.0 16.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 1 5 1.000 0.0 1.000 TOTAL 117 4 90 211 39.000 1.000 27.000 67.000 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 410 (201) 27 (22) 1199 1919) 1636 (1142)- 240.000 9.000 603.000 852.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 338 068) 10 (6) 4 (3) 352 077) 169.000 4.000 0.0 173.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 9 -(37) 2 (1) 235 (121) 296 059) 27.000 0.0 93.000 120.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 61 18 0 ) 19 08) 33 (34) 113 (112s 18.000 6.000 7.000 31.000 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 83 (70) 17 (14) 119 (111) 219 (195 l 27.000 6.000 33.000 66.000 GRAND TOTAL 951 sam 75 (811 1590(1155) 2616 (1785) 481 100 25.000 736.000 1242.000 ' Workers may be counted in more then one category. Numbers in perentheses are total numbers of individuals.

t APPENDlX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERCONNEL AND MAN. REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION Plant: Humboldt Bay (BWR) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 mrom) TOTAL MAN-REMS STATICN UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL WORK & M FUNCTM EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PE RSONS EPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN-REM Reactor Operations & Surv. Mantononce Personnel 0 0 Operating Personnel. 6 1.4 Health Physics Pm x>nnel 1 0.2 Supervisory Personnel 1 0.1 Engineering Personnel 1 0.2 TOTAL 9 0 0 9 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.9 Routine Maintenance _ Maintenance-Personne 6 1.2 Opereting Personnel 0 n.n Health Physics Personnel 0 n.3 Supervisory Personnel 0 n.0 Engineering Personnel 0 0.0 TOTAL 6 0 0 6 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 bService inspection Maintenance Personnel Operating Personnel Health Physics Personnel Supervisory Personnel Engineering Personnel TOTAL 0 n n 0 0.0 0.0 nn n.n Special M.intenance Mantenance Personnel 0 0 0.0 0.0 Operating Personnel 0 0 0.0 nn Health Physice Personnel 1 0 0.2 n_s Supervisory Personnet 0 1 0.0 0.5 Engineering Personnel U 2 0.0 n6 TOTAL 4 U 3 4 0.2 0.0 1 1 1 1 Weste Processing _Maantenance Personnel 1 0.0 0.1 _ Operating Personnel 0 0.0 0.0 _ Health Physics Personnel 0 0.2 0.0 Supervisory Personnel 0 0.0 0.0 Engineering Personnel 0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 1 0 4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 Refuehng Maintenance Personnel __ Operating Personnel _Heef th Physics Personnel __ Supervisory Personnel Engsneering Personnel TOTAL 0 n n 0 n_n nn nn nn Total By Job Function Memtenance Personaal 6 1 0 7 13 n1 nn 1 1 _Operstmg PMnei 6 0 0 h 1.4 n.n nr i' __ Health Physics Personnel 2 0 0 2 0.9 nn an na _ Supervisory Personnel 1 0 1 2 0.1 0.3 0.5 n.6 Engineering Personnel 1 0 2 1 0.2 0.0 0.6 nn GRAND TOTAL 16 1 3 ?n 1_R n1 1 1 Rn 78

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANTt INDIAN POINT 1.2 (PWR) 1981 14 UMBER OF PE.<SONNEL f>102 1-It EM ) To"At MAN-RE'S STATI )N L TILI"Y C0m ' tA :T TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CD "RACT TOTAL WORK & JOB FUNCTIGN EMPLOY EE3 EPPLOYl!ES & C ' iE tS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYMES S HERS RAM-EERE REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 38 0 0 5.200 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 91 0 0 171.600 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 7 2.800 0.0 16.400 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 42 0 1 24.700 0.0 0.900 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7 16 1 4.800-1.700" 8.500 TOTAL 166 16 9 211 209.100 1.700 17.800 222.600 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 34 14 67 94.200 11.800 62.500 OPERATING PERSONNEL 12 0 0 9.700 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 19 1.600 0.0 11.200 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 12 4 0 31.500 7.500 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 12 0 2.800 1.800 0.0 TOTAL 68 30 86 184 139.800 21.100 73.700 234.600 IN-SERVICE INSPECTIDH MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 38 0.0 0.0 10.200 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 2 0.300 0.0 2.990 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 0 5 3.100 0.0 2.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.0 0.300 0.0 TOTAL 5 1 45 51 3.400 0.300 15.200 18.900 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 302 1084 0.0 '495.800 1111.600 'J OPERATING PERSONNEL 15 0 0 12.500 0.0 0.0

• HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6

0 113 17.200 0.0 105.800 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 41 37 1.400 56.800 44.200 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 8 10 3.200 1.400 1.800 TOTAL 31 351 1244 1626 34.300 554.000 1263.400 1851.700 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 28 0 74 16.400 0.0 125.100 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5 0 8 4.700 0.0 6.100 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 -0 8 2.800 0.0 6.400 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 0 8 6.800 0.0 14.200 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 42 0. 98 140 30.700 0.0 151.A00 152.500 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 14 34 14 21.600 40.900 12.300 OPERATING PERSONNEL 27 0 0 22.800 0.0 0.0 HE.*.LTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 5 0.400 8.0 3.200 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 4 0 8.800 6.200 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 1 1 0.0 0.300 0.200 TOTAL 53 39 20 112 53.600 47.400 15.700 116.700 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 114 350 1277 1741 137.400 548.500 1321.700 2007.600 OPERATING PERSONNEL 150 0 8 158 221.300 0.0 6.100 227.400-HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 0 154 183 25.100 0.0 145.900 171.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 77 49 51 177 76.300 70.500 61.400 '208.200 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 38 12 65 10.800 5.500 2.500 18.800 GRAND TOTAL 385 437 1502 2324 470.900 624.500 1537.600 2633.000

APPENDIX C (Cont) NUMBER OF PERSOHNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION ElfMTs INDIAN POINT 3 'PWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PE150NNEL (>100 M-REM) T0"At MAN-RE19 STATION UTI.ITY CON' RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CO CRACT TOTAL WORK 3 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 4 0 4ERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYl!ES 8 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 0 0 1.240 0.0 0.570 OPERATING PERSONNEL 29 1 2 17.790 0,300 1.510 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 1 28 9.150 0.570 14.610 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL to 0 0 3.850 0.0 0.120 ENGINEERING PERSONHEL 4 0 0 1.400 0.010 0.300 TOTAL 62 2 30 94 33.430 0.880 17.110 51.420

• ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 23 0

42 7.160 0.010 21.650 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4 0 0 1.670 0.010 0.820 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL-0 0 1 0.010 0.020 0.350 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.22J 0.010 0.040 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.090 0.020 0.230 TOTAL 27 0 43 70 9. 13 0 0.070 23.100 32.320 7

• IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4

0 1 1.470 0.010 0.260 5 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.050 0.060 0.040 E HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.050 0.010 0.060 SUPERVISORY PERSONHEL 0 1 0 0.230 0.180 0.250 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 3 0 5 0.950 0.320 2.830 b TOTAL 7 1 6 14 2.750 0.580 3.440 6.7/0

• SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 69 0

214 47.400 0.0 200.950 [ @ OPERATING PERSOHNEL 18 1 1 5.050 0.160 0.330 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 34 11.760 0.020 17.960 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0 to ~ 5.530 0.200 10.540 I ENGIHEERING PERSONNEL 5 1 7 2.230 0.310 5.130 TOTAL 114 2 266 382 71.970 0.690 234.910 307.570 m I)

• WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 2 0.360 0.0 4.800 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.040 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 0 1 0.610 0.0 0.380 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 9.S 0.0 0.0 1 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 ' 0 0.050 0.0 0.080 TOTAL 2 0_ 3 5 1.060 0.0 5.260 6.320

• EFUELING R

? MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0. 0 0.500 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.020 0.0 0.0 l HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 ~ 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.010 0.0 O.0 O.030 0.040 0.210 ENGINEERING PERSONHEL 0 'O O TOTAL 2 0 0 2 0.560 0.040 0.210

0. git _,

~~ ' TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 99 0 259 ~ 358 58.130 c7320 228.240 286.390 OPERATING PERSONNEL 51 2 3 56 J,95.620 0.530 2.700 27.850 33.360 55.560 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 31 1 64 96 21.580 ~~ 0.620 ~ = SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 21 1 to 32 9.840 0.390 10.950 21.180 12 25 4.750 0.700 8.780 14.230 ENGIHEERING PERSONNEL 12 1 348 567 118.920 2.260 284.030 405.210 E GRAND TOTAL 214 5 Workers may be chnted in more than one category. " Doses are bened on pecker dosimeter readings. g s

i APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTICH ( 211NT: KEWAUNEE (PWR) 1981 . MAS-REP3 TOTAL HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY C0t "RACT TOTAL WORK 4 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES A ~0THERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYBd$_ - 1 O 'HERS MAN-REMS e REACTOR OPERATIONS 8 5 U P. 6 _ MsINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.340 0.0 0.6 OPERATING PERSONNEL 17 1 2 3.404 0.080 0.171 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 O.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 1 1.133 0.0 0.0 _EMGIRFFRING PERSONNEL 3 2 2 0.252 0.324 0.408 TOTAL 27 3 5 35 5.129 0.404 0.579 6.112 fa0 TIME MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 33 19 49 8.032 3.743 18.127 0FERATING PERSONNEL 13 1 4 1.240 d.035 0.050 a HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0 11 3.562 0.0 4.174 St;PERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 13 0.029 0.0 2.883 ENGINEEgih'q_EERSONN rt 3 1 2 .__0.016 0.015 0.035 TOTAL 65 21 79 165 12.379 3.793 25.269 41.941 e TN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 25 0.0 0.0 13.219 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 7 0.0 0.0 2.960 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.040 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 3 0 32 35 0.040 0.0 16.179 16.219 'SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 32 19 93 5.085 1.921 31.656 CD OPERATING PERSONNEL 7 1 6 0.708 0.111 0.205 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 0 0 0.003 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 1 0.078 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 2 3 0.260 0.085 0.397 TOTAL 48 22 103 173 6.134 2.117 32.258 40.509 l WASTE PROCESSING l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 15 14 to 0.670 0.086 0.715 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5 1 2 2.799 0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL to 0 0 1.851 .0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 30 15 12 57 5.320 0.086 0.7 15 6.121

• REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 16 8

2.503 3.208 1.459 OPERATING PERSONNEL 10 1 12 0.386 0.0 8.595 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.101 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.009 0.0 0.0 TO7AL 30 17 20 67 2.999 3.208 9.854 16.061 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 98 68 185 351 16.630 8.958 65.176 90.764 OPERATING PERSONNEL 52 5 33 90 8.537 0.226 11.781 20.544 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 32 0 11 43 5.416 0.0

4. 17 4 9.590 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0

15 26 1.381 0.0 2.883 4.264 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL to 5 7 22 0.537 0.424 0.840 1.801 GRAND TOTAL 203 78 251 532 32.501 9.608 84.854 126.963 ' Workers may be counted in more than one category.

-. m } f8J APPENDIX C (Cont.) J-s: NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION

• yk PLANT LACROSSE (BWR) 1981

. f<$. UlMBER OF PER)0NNEL (>101 1-REM) TOTAL MAN-RERM T. 1.cv STATIC P L TI[ITY COD " TACT TOTAL STATION UTIEIT y' CON"RACT ,TnTAL_' , WORK 8 J)B FUSCTION EMPLOYELS EPlP L OYEE S 8( ' 4ERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES em-L DYE h & DHMS + !IRAM-Q REACTOR OP ERATIC NS 8 SURW. ,jp MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 9 0 0 '3.174 ' O.0 0.0 ,_ "~~- x OPERATING PERSONNEL 20 0 0 35.208 / 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 0 8.943 8.9 9.884 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0 0 8.534 0.0 0.213 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 0 0 2.e44 A.029 A.175 TOTAL 52 0 0 52 57.903 a.329 a.476 53.ema e ROOTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTtNANCE PERSONNEL 18 0 1 23.603 8.8. 9.256 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6 0 0 2.076 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PER$0NNEL 6 0 0 1.604 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 0 0 4.384 0.9 9.992 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.643 0.0 0.068 TOTAL 39 0 1 40 32.230 A.d 5.313 32.54a e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6 0 0 .1.174 0.0 -0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.172 8.9 8.9 7* HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 8.024 0.0 0.0 y SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.232 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.4 \\ A.P g.3 cN's TOTAL 7 0 0 7 1.682 - e.O g.g 1.622 e _3' t SPECIAL MAINTENANCE \\ a. 310. 0.00L m Q ~~ ^ ~ ~ MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 14 2 0 7.472 3 gOPERATINGPERSONNEL 7 0 0 1.866 8.8~ 0.0 wCc w _ "-r HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 0 0 1.894 0.'6 " 8.0 s" SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 0 2.006 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 0 0 1.922 3.e-s.154 TOTAL 34 2 0 36 15.16D e.313 5.136 15.656 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0 2 0.478 0.0 1.444 OPERATING PERSONNEL 4 0 0 0.821 0.0 9.9. HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.905 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0-0 0.650 0.0 0.0' ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.850 0.0 A.3 TOTAL 10 0 2 12 2.904 s.B 1.448 x 4.352 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5 0 0 1.501 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.555 0.8 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.537-0.0 0.0 ~ , su SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 b 1 0.277

0. 0.

0.135 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 8.217 A.8 8.8 18 TOTAL 10 0 1 11 3.sa7 E.8 A.153 3.24m TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 54 08) 2 3 59 03) 37.482 0.31C 1.706 39.418 OPERATING PERSONNEL 37 GB) 0 0 37 09) 40.698 S.S. 9.9 49.494 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL' 24 NI) J 0 24 GB) 13.907 0.0 0.088 13.995-SUPERVISORY PFf50NNEL 27 US) J 1 28 09). 16.003 0.0 0.350 16.353 l FNGINEERING P*cRSONNEL 10 D) 7 0 to DI 4.876 a.829 a.387 5.292 GRAND TOTAL 152 01) 2 4 158 071 112.886 3.339 2.531 115.756

• Workers may be counted in more then one setegory. Nwnhors in parentheses are total numbers of indwiduals.

l

s APPENDIX C (Cont.) MUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 1981 PLANT: MAINE YANKEE (PWR), (>10B 1-REM) YoAL MAN-REN!i N JMBER OF PE'tSONNEL STATIO 4 UTI.ITY Colt TACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y CBM'RACT 'TATAL WORK 8 JDs FUNCTION EMPLOYE ES EMPLI)YEES & Ti 4ERS PERSONS EMPLOYEE 5 EMPLOYl FE AD

===i Eir ____ eREACTOR OPERATIONS S SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 e 'O.410 0.005 0.115 OPERATING PERSONNEL 17 0 0 4.490 0.0 0.030 NEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4 0 1 1.140-0.0 0.210 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.370 .0.047 0.122. ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 4 1.14e s. tas 1.277 TOTAL 25 0 5 38 7.550 0.437 1.754 9.741 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 33 0 19 18.351 0.0 6.414 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 C 1.122 0.0 0.105-HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 1 1.930 0.0 0.230 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 8.276 8.8 0.885 - ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 2 S.550 S.818 h.355 TOTAL 44 0 22 66 22.229 5.A10 7.159 29.343 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 0 49 0.850 0.0 28.478 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.165 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.005 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.8 8.178 ENGINEERING FERSONNEL 1 1 20 0.395' e.355 a.175 TOTAL 4 1 78 75

• ' 1e e.355 37.52a 39.293
• SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0

0 0 .8.8 8.0 3.s 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 g OPERATING PERSONNEL HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0-0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 .8 8.0 0.0 8.8 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.8 3.0 ae TOTAL 0 0, 0 0 8.0 e.s 3.s c.s e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 11 0 11 3.870 0.0 4.395 OPERATING PERSONNEL 20 0 2 5.892 0.0 0.895 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 0 1 .0.265 0.0 0.245 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.090 0.160 0.005 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 S. 167 8.8 8.885 TOTAL 33 0 14 47 10.284 a.16e 5.545 15 tas e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 32 0 282 26.360 0.0 187.953 OPERATING PERSONNEL 37 0 2 18.876 0.0 0.237 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 3 1 3.655 0.025-25.654 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 43 4.704 0.0 8.496 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 6 23 5.295 3.137 9.93e TOTAL 96 6 351 453 58.89e 3.162 224.278 was.uws e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 79 0 361 440 49.841 0.005 227.355 277.201 OPERATING PERSONNEL 76 0 4 80 30.545 0.0 1.267 31.412 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0 46 69 8.039 0.0 26.344 34.383 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7 0 2 9 4.391 0.232 0.798 5.421 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 17 7,, __ _ 49 73 7.547 '3.AR7 28.442 31.A76 GRAND TOTAL 202 7 __,, 462 671 150.363 4.124 276.2A6 335.693

• Worken may be counted in more then one setetory.

I APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMAER OF PERSJ.642L AND MAN-REA BY WORT. AHD JOB FUNCTION PLANT: MILLSTONE 1 (BWR) .~ 1981 1UHBER OF PERSUNNdt (>100 M-REM) T0"At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y CON"RACT TOTAL e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMFLOYEES & 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAIN 1EHANCE PERSONNEL 15 0 2 10.400 0.010 0.690 OPERATING PERSONNEL 54 0 0 49.990 0.0 0.180 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 3 47 9.210 1.920 15.050 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.160 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 1 0.960 0.090 0.640 TOTAL 85 3 50 133 70.720 2.020 16.560 89.300__ e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 4 0 1 2.380 0.120 0.320 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.430 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.060 0.0 0.160 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.030 TOTAL 4 0 1 5 2.870 0.120 0.510 3.500

• IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 45 0.250 0.130 14.020 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.440 0.0 0.070 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.170 3.050 1.160 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.040 0.0 0.010 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 2 13 1.210 2.290 7.280 TOTAL 4 2 60 66 2.110 2.470 22.540 27.120 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 47 40 1178 70.350 26.690 857.680 g CPERATING PERSONNEL 40 0 43 12.590 0.050 48.350 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 16 4 103 11.060 1.830 73.690 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 0 7 0.790 0.0 3.190 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 19 21 102 8.720 11.340 66.210 TOTAL 126 65 1433 1624 103.510 39.910 1049.120 1192.540 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0 24 0.760 0.100 13.230 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 29 0 1 9.960 0.0 0.770 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 2 11 2.260 0.460 3.790 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 7 0.540 0.0 7.710 TOTAL 37 2 43 82 13.520 0.560 25.500 39.580 o REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 26 12 5 14.450 8.650 3.040 OPERATING PERSONNEL 35 0 0 10.700 0.0 0.250 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 2 0 to 0.570 0.110 3.390 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.130 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 5 4 1.590 2.250 1.690 TOTAL 67 17 19 103 27.440 11.010 8.370 46.820 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 95 52 1255 1402 98.590 35.700 888.980 1023.270 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 158 0 44 202 34.110 0.050 49.620 133.780 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 38 9 173 220 23.330 4.370 97.240 124.940 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 4 0 7 11 1.120 0.0 3.200 4.320 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 28 28 127 183 13.020 15.970 83.560 112.550 GRAND TOTAL 323 89 1606 2018 220.170 56.090 1122.400 1398.860 Workers may be counted in more than one category. Y" N~' f Y. *j j ,$ ?. _ .a ' l, c. [

• ~

d }, l. 4. .. < f _. v. g ;. x ; 4 ..;V ': y,j.. ~

f. '.s r

o w n .-e. q 7

.y y l -

s c 7,.- 1.-. r . J .._ v_. , y,,, .t 1,: .s.. ' +-' .1,?') \\. I d j) ", f 4-y } ? g ,p '[ ] e h

7 APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: MILLSTONE 2 (PWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>10t M-REM) T0'AL MAH-RENS STATION UTILITY COFTRAC' TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CONTRACT TOTAL WORK 2 JOB FUNCTION' EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & C.THERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN-REMS .REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 1 0 1.290 0.260 0.030 OPERATING PERSONNEL 35 0 0 17.130 0.0 0.020 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0 41 8.910 0.110 11.120 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.110 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERIHO PERSONNEL 3 1 2 1.000 0.400 0.610 T O T A'l 54 2 43 99 28.440 0.770 11.780 40.990 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 8 0 0 1.740 0.020 0.100 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.010 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.050 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 8 0 0 8 1.800 0.020 0.100 1.920

• IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1

0 25 0.640 0.090 12.750 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.0 0.0 5.060 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 7 0.0 0.0 2.110 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.f40 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 12 0.0 0.0 7.350 TOTAL 1 0 48 49 0.640 0.090 27.410 28.140

• SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 49 32 409 49.780 11.810 256.310
• 0PERATING PERSOHNEL 32 0

16 8.410 0.0 1R.750 03 McALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 1 52 5.250 0.450 18.780 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 5 0.070 0.0 5.460 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 8 45 3.050 2.920 21.280 TOTAL 98 41 527 666 66.560 15.180 312.580 394.31g__ MASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 7 0 8 2.310 0.010 1.980 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6 0 0 1.880 0.0 0.200 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.810 0.0 0.950 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PER$0HHEL 0 0 0 0.040 G.0 0.020 TOTAL 16 0 8 24 5.040 0.010 3.150 8.200 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 23 0 15 10.200 0.020 8.370 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.580 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.610 l SUPERVISORY PERSONMEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.010 l ENGINEERING PERSON 1'EL 0 0 7 0.010 0.060 3.280 TOTAL 23 0 24 47 10.790 0.080 12.270 23.140 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 91 33 457 581 65.960 12.210 279.540 357.710 OPERATING PERSONNEL 73 0 20 93 28.010 0.0 16.030 44.040 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 1 102 127 15.020 0.560 33.570 49.150 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 5 5 0.180 0.0 5.6f0 5.790 EHGINEERING PERSONNEL 12 9 66 87 4.100 3.380 32.540 40.020 GRAND TOTAL 200 43 650 893 113.270 16.150 367.290 496.710

• Workers may be coungiin more than one category.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 9 PLANT: MONTICELLO (BWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) TOTAL MAH-REMS STATION U*ILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CON'RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES S OTHERS PERSONS EM,PLOYEE3 EMPLOYEES 8 0"HERS MAH-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS S SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 52 42 246 16.420 1.811 19.058 CPERATING PERSONNEL 47 0 2 36.804 0.0 0.043 HEALTH PHYSICS PiRSONNEL 21 0 32 10.062 0.0 5.058 i SUPERVISOPY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 25 15 48 4.838 0.766 4.872 TOTAL 145 57 328 530 68.124 2.577 29.031 99.732 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 59 107 393 19.445 12.121 50.503 OPERATING PERSONNEL 32 0 0 1.751 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0 13 0.415 0.0 1.330 CUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 21 13 49 1.705 0.565 3.544 TOTAL 122 120 455 697 23.316 12.686 55.377 91.379 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 16 18 0.804 1.254 2.556 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8 4_ 18 0.125 3.507 13.222 TOTAL 18 2 2_, _ 36 74 0.929 4.761 15.778 21.468 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 55 110 605 25,190 49.508 521.463 $ OPERATING PERSONNEL 44 0 0 22.613 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 21 0 38 3.881 0.0 26.965 i SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 24 110 7.514 10.948 89.295 TOTAL 142 134 753 1029 59.198 60.456 637.723 757.377 e MASTE PROCESSING l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 23 0 5 1,005 0.0 0.524 OPERATING PERSONNEL 27 0 2 2.558 0.0 2.285 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9 0 1 1.023 0.0 0.045 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 3 0.014 0.0 0.102 TOTAL 61 0 11 72 4.600 0.0 2.956 7.556 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 33 11 1.151 1.740 0.690 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 45 0 0 4.516 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.503 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 1 19 0.334 0.109 4.881 TOTAL 72 34 32 138 6.001 1.849 6.074 13.924 e 1.0TAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 221 308 1278 1807 e4.015 66.434 594.794 725.243 OPERATING PERSONNEL 195 0 4 199 68.242 0.0 2.328 70.570 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 61 0 86 147 15.381 0.0 33.901 49.282 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 83 57 247 387 14.530 15.895 115.916 146.341 GRAND TOTAL 560 365 1615 2540 _ 162.168 82.329 746.939 991.436

• vvorkers may be counted in more than one cateoory. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.
  • lncluded maintenance performed in primary containment during plant shutdown, fire penetration upgrade, and torus, core spray pipe. and feedwater sparger modifications.

. '. N.'. l ' ' c.:3* *,, ',s 2.^~.' + + ~* - 9% -.. '. * < ' f%... - .' e d.. 3. . '[ ' y , y -, -~\\ '.. ' 4.. i' qb y %,.' y {.j '

a.-

4,p*.,,( ,..o y< .i

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION 9 PLANT: NINE MILE POINT (BWR) 1981 1 UMBER OF PERSONNEL (>1J9 M-REM) T0'At MAN-REMS STATI )N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y CONTRACT TOTAL e_ WORK 1 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYEES t OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAH-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SUR". MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 137 39 172 19.009 1.818 9.669 OPERATING PERSONNEL 134 0 8 27.113 0.0 1.174 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 26 0 /5 33.158 0.0 32.879 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 40 0 15 14.446 0.0 0.829 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 21 10 33 1.723 0.213 2.032 TOTAL 358 49 303 710 95.449 2.031 46.583 144.063 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINiENANCE PERSONNEL 269 104 699 78.243 31.654 100.230 OPERATING PERSONNEL 168 0 10 12.041 0.0 2.785 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 35 0 86 1.711 0.0 10.417 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 43 0 22 2.857 0.0 3.325 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 30 14 59 2.342 0.223 3.460 TOTAL 545 118 876 1539 97.194 31.877 120.217 249.288 IH-SfRVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONHEL 24 23 146 1.013 0.329 107.504 OPERATING PERSONNEL 18 0 2 0.101 0.0 0.007 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 14 0.152 0.0 0.154 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 to 0.155 0.0 5.775 ENGINETRING PERSONNEL 2 8 12 0.015 0.278 0.706 TOTAL 59 31 184 274 1.436 0.607 114.146 116.189 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 533 369 1201 95.946 71.957 626.861 oo0PERATING PERSOHNEL 131 0 16 4.823 0.0 4.975 N HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 49 0 103 1.369 0.0 9.588 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 70 0 33 8.511 0.0 5.744 ENGINEERING PERSONNEt 51 32 127 8.042 2.138 32.785 TOTAL 834 401 1480 2715 118.691 74.095 679.953 872.739 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 87 29 74 22.457 1.543 5.586 OPERATING PERSONNEL 50 0 2 15.521 0.0 0.212 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 20 0 26 4.308 0.0 9.537 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0 1 1.583 0.0 0.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 2 6 0.414 0.030 0.120 l TOTAL 171 31 109 318 44.283 1.573 15.555 61.411 = \\ e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 111 62 248 22.700 22.765 64.796 OPERATING PERSONNEL 43 0 5 6.454 0.0 0.617 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 12 0 28 1.031 0.0 3.104 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 21 0 15 0.984 0.0 3.870 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 20 17 44 2.959 0.266 13.117 TOTAL 212 79 340 631 36.128 23.031 85.504 144.663 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1161 626 2540 4327 239.368 130.066 914.646 1284.080 OPERATING PERSONNEL 549 0 43 592 68.053 0.0 9.770 77.823 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14r 0 332 480 41.729 0.C 65.679 107.408 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 193 0 96 289 28.536 0.0 19.643 48.179 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 128 83 281 492 15.495 3.148 52.220 70.863 GRAND TOTAL 2179 709 3292 6180 393.181 133.214 1061.958 1588.353 ' Workers may be counted in more than one category.

,... e APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAH-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: NORTH ANNA 13 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) TOTAL MAN-REMS STATION U TJ L I T Y CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL e WORK 3 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 4 OTHERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 199 7 518 29.560 0.031 36.424 DPERATING PERSONNEL 109 3 54 52.307 0.006 1.357 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 54 14 90 41.667 0.357 43.238 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 88 7 1 3.890 0.040 0.109 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 29 12 91 1.003 0.139 4.832 TOTAL 479 43 754 1276 128.427 0.573 85.960 214.960 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 158 6 413 133.629 0.638 95.184 OPERATING PERSONNEL 78 0 51 15.069 0.0 2.834 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 30 0 22 5.868 0.0 4.771 SUPERVISORY PCRSONNEL 51 0 1 5.007 0.0 0.388 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 5 75 0.201 0.022 7.024 TOTAL 326 11 562 899 159.774 C.664 110.201 270.635 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 2 122 17.091 0.425 33.473 OPERATING PERSONNEL 21 0 5 1.421 J.0 0.044 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0 21 2.616 0.0 4.637 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7 0 0 1.004 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 0 36 0,166 0.0 3.070 TOTAL 61 2 184 247 22.198 0.425 41.229 63 852 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 74 0 538 25.452 0.0 118.962 osOPERATING PERSONNEL 26 0 19 0.979 0.0 1.791 08 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 18 0.349 0.0 0.805 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 32 1 0 1.034 0.002 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 46 0.030 0.0 2.652 TOTAL 142 1 621 764 27.844 0.002 124.210 152.056 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 98 2 92 2.411 0.006 2.558 OPERATING PERSONNEL 82 1 13 7.379 0.002 8.194 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 34 2 43 8.117 0.007 4.392 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 0 0 0.316 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL to 0 11 0.046 0.0 0.045 TOTAL 238 5 if9 402 18.269 0.015 15.189 33.473 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 73 0 47 18.997 0.0 9.642 OPERATING PERSONNEL 78 0 1 4.798 0.0 0.018 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0 28 0.829 0.0 3.784 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 18 1 0 1.273 0.088 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 6 18 0.017 0.320 2.241 TGTAt 190 7 94 291 25.914 0.408 15.685 42.007 e TOTAL SY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 618 17 1730 2365 227.140 1.100 296.248 524.488 CPERATING PERSONNEL 394 4 143 541 81.953 0.008 14.238 96.199 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 157 16 222 395 59.446 0.364 61.627 121.437 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 210 9 2 221 12.524 0.130 0.497 13.151 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 57 23 277 357 1.363 0.481 19.864 21.708 GRAND TOTAL 1436 69 2374 3879 382.426 2.083 392.474 776.983

• Workers may be counted in raore than one category.

l

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: OCONEE 1.2.3 (PWR) 1981 .HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (3100 M-RPM) ,T0"Al MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONT RAC" TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y COH"RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OT iERL PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS a SURV. MAINTENANCE PERS3HHEL 74 152 38 3.955 6.850 4.510 OPERATING PERSONNEL 97 17 0 46.835 8.675 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PER?qNNEL 68 22 111 18.125 0.960 16.385 $UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 2 0 0.260 0.105 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 90 30 25 18.075 3.550 0.855 TOTAL 334 223 174 731 87.250 20.140 21.750 129.140 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTEHAHCE PERSONNEL 214 378 88 77.570 71.040 46.275 OPERATING PERSONNEL 32 8 0 1.845 1.395 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 63 12 103 8.705 0.440 17.830 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.140 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 59 47 54 9.505 5.057 4.400 TOTAL 371 445 245 1061 97.765 77.932 68.505 244.202 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 63 250 20 8.775 104.745 1.975 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 9 2 0 0.270 0.085 0.0 dEALTH PHYSICS PERSONHEL 34 8 91 2.285 0.320 22.550 SUPERVISORY PEP1NEL 1 0 0 0.030 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PEG _ dHEL 27 19 77 4.505 3.500 50.450 T0fAL 134 279 188 601 15.865 108.650 74.975 199.490 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 218 497 55 106.015 330.990 13.445 osOPERATING PERSONNEL 62 14 0 7.225 1.715 0.0 @ HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 56 19 114 16.400 2.045 39.695 $UPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 1 0 1.515 0.060 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 74 70 105 27.235 23.570 52.880 TOTAL 415 601 274 1290 158.390 358.380 106.020 622.790 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 38 53 35 4.195 2.030 6.405 OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 4 0 1.725 0.105 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 41 2 43 9.735 0.020 1.825 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.145 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 27 1 0 4.850 0.020 0.0 TOTAL 130 60.___ 78 268 20.650 2.175 8.230 31.0S5 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL '57 276 52 55.465 38.130 11.800 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 76 14 0 9.680 1.750 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 37 18 86 4.485 2.830 11.935 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 1 0 0.915 0.030 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 62 32 66 10.255 3.030 11.690 TOTAL 335 341 204 880 80.800 45.770 35.425 161.995 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 764 1606 288 2658 255.975 553.785 84.410 894.170 OPERATING PERSONNEL 298 59 0 357 67.580 13.725 0.0 81.305 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 299 81 548 928 59.735 6.615 110.220 176.570 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 19 4 0 23 3.005 0.195 0.0 3.200 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 339 199 327 865 74.425 38.727 120.275 233.427 GRAND TOTAL 1719 1949 1163 4831 460.72r 613.047 314.905 1388.672

• Doses are based on pocket dosimeter readings, Approximately 93.5 man-rems were received as a result of NRC mandated work.

APPENDIX C (Cont) NUMBER OF PE<aosdEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: OYSTER CREEK (BWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNE JD_100 M-REM) T0'AL MAN-REMS _1TATICM UTILITY __,__ CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CONTRACT TOTAL e WORK & JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE $___ % OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS S SURV. MAINTENANCE PE2SONNEL 68 4 36 3.292 0.12t 4.861 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 87 1 5 19.888 0.0 0.754 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL to 0 31 0.223 0.0 4.240 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 0 0 1.210 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 16 1 8 1.008 0.052 1.163 TOTAL 18 9 6 80 275 25.621 0.180 11.018 36.819 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 212 43 401 136.137 19.997 99.819 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 115 2 39 49.239 2.169 2.429 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 34 0 131 11.974 0.0 78.331 SUPERVISORY PER$0HHEL 36 1 3 7.672 0.372 0.005 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 45 6 63 3.482 0.288 5.144 TOTAL ^4L_ 52 637 1131 208.504 22.826 185.728 417.053 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 24 0 42 0.522 0.0 5.562 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 11 0 7 0.383 0.0 0.334 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 0 8 0.172 0.0 0.418 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0 0 0.2f3 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 15 4 16 0.337 0.035 2.265 TOTAL 66 4 73 14} 1.627 0.035 8.579 10.241 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 182 29 477 42.541 7.766 136.303 u30PERATING PERSOHNEL 70 2 23 8.50! 0.688 3.763 OHEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHE6 17 0 79 1.909 0.0 9.593 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 18 0 0 3.275 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 18 3 33 1.733 0.035 2.595 TOTAL 305 34 612 951 57.961 8.489 152.254 218.704 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 102 2 37 5.090 0.003 3.729 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 26 0 3 1.758 3.0 0.067 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 3 0 10 0.127 0.0 2.467 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 2 0 1 0.031 0.1 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.0 0.0 0.096 TOTAL 133 2 55 190 7.006 0.003 6.359 13.368 REFUELING. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 1 0 0.020 0.005 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.010 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 4 1 0 5 0.030 0.005 0.0 0.035 o TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 591 (215) 79 (43) 993 (S54) 1663 (812) 187.602 27.899 250.274 465.775 OPERATING PERSONNEL 309 016) 5 (2) 77 (52) 391 8173) 79.771 2.857 7.347 89.975 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 69 (35) 0 259 035) 328 (170) 14.402 0.0 95.049 109.454 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 75 (33) 1 0) 4 (4) 80 (43) 12.401 0.372 0.005 12.778 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 95 (51) 14 (9) 124 08) 233 {1_38) 6.570 0.410 11.263 18.243 GRAND TOTAL 1139 R55) 99 (55) 1457 (823) 26 95 (13f6 300.749 31.538 363.938 696.225

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT PALISADES (PWR) 1981 hUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM)

• 'T0'At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y CON"RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES

& OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEEd 1 0'HERS MAN-REMS ,EACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. R MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 0 7 0.342 0.061 2.080 OPERATING PERSONNEL 45 2 4 16.852 0.315 0.748 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 40 3 152 12.667 1.951 89.309 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 5 0 9 2.227 0.149 9.306 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 0 14 1.765 0.079 4.555 TOTAL 100 5 186 291 33.853 2.555 105.998 142.406

• ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 84 26 68 41.246 10.170 32.528 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0

0 0 0.129 0.0 0.031 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3 1 21 0.775 p.247 10.989 SUPERVISORY PERSONMEL 14 2 9 4.736 0.653 2.852 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 7 1.048 0.191 2.906 TOTAL 103 29 105 237 47.934 11.261 49.306 108.501 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERS0HHEL 1 0 3 0.093 0.014 0.478 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.007 0.0 0.007 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.013 0.0 1.791 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 2 0.173 0.061 0.940 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 2 26 0.695 1.039 8.950 TOTAL 4 2 33 39 0.981 1.114 12.166 14.261 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 33 99 840 10.348 26.958 404.181 e OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.004 0.0 0.036 -* HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 0 0 4 0.009 0.0 1.451 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 1 22 0.430 0.694 7.339 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 4 40 1.394 0.744 11.935 TOTAL 40 104 906 1050 12.185 28.396 424.942 465.523 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 3 13 0.435 0.654 2.758 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.004 0.0 3.504 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.029 0.007 0.164 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.006 0.0 2.317 ENGINEERING PER$0HNEL 0 0 3 0.0 0.0 1.942 TOTAL 1 3 25 11 0.474 0.661 10.685 11.820 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 36 0.0 0.0 22.484 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 1 1.165 0.0 0.159 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.372 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.029 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.001 0.0 0.802 TOTAL 2 0 42 44 1.195 0.0 23.817 25.012

• TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 120 128 967 1215 52.464 37.857 464.509 554.830 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 47 2

9 58 18.161 0.315 4.485 22.961 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 43 4 181 228 13.493 2.205 104.076 119.774 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 21 3 46 70 7.601 1.557 22.754 31.912 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 19 6 94 119 4.903 2.053 31.090 18.046 GRAND TOTAL 250 143 1297 1690 96.622 43.987 626.914 767.511__ Workers may be counted in more than one category.

• Doses were normalized to agree with doses determined by TLD's. About 55% of the total plant exposure resulted from special maintenance, such as primary coolant pump seal replacements.

controi red drive seals, and steam generator spa per ring. 1

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: PEACH BOTTOM 2.3 (BWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) T0"At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY COH'RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y COH'RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 3 0"HERS PEPSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS 3 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5 82 76 2.630 37.925 23.081 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 68 8 25 45.647 5.201 4.541 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 47 4 73 43.854 3.250 42.441 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 2 1 0.0 0.232 0.305 ENGINEERING PER.SONNEL 30 13 18 25.030 4.328 15.224 TOTAL 150 109 193 452 117.161 50.936 85.592 253.689 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 545 1034 3.926 360.312 1274.803 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6 3 6 1.134 0.604 8.386 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 16 2 33 7.993 0.711 20.523 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 5 0 0.0 1.712 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 16 8 1.664 7.809 3.101 TOTAL 34 571 1081 1690 14.717 371.228 1306.813 1692.758 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 8 47 0.0 7.424 51.407 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0-0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.0 0.131 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 0 2 3 0.0 1.858 2.001 TOTAL 0 11 50 61 0.0 9.413 53.408 62.821 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 4 185 0.0 1.287 256.445 e OPERATING PERSOHHEL 1 0 0 0.116 0.0 0.0 N HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 0 1 4 0.0 0.132 2.991 TOTAL 1 5 189 195 0.116 1.419 259.436 260.971 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 5 83 0.0 1.857 26.019 OPERATING PERSONNEL 8 0 1 6.612 0.0 0.156 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 4 3.301 0.0 2.330 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 15 5 88 108 9.913 1.857 28.505 40.275 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 0 9 34 0.0 2.410 9.969 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.187 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 3 0 1 1.511 0.0 0.153 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 9 1 0.0 0.0 0.444 TOTAL 4 9 36 49 1.698 2.410 10.566 14.674 oTOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 15 (12) 653 (593) 1459 (1267) 2127 0872) 6.556 411.215 1641.724 2059.495 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 84 (75). 11 01) 32 (41) 127 (127) 53.696 5.885 13.083 72.664 HEALTH PHYSICS PERS0HNEL 73 (54) 6 (5) 111 (93) 190 (148) 56.659 3.961 65.447 126.067 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 8 (7) 1 0) 9 (8: 0.0 2.075 0.305 2.380 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 36 (31) 32 (29) 34 (27) 102 (87 26.694 14.127 23.761 64.582 GRAND TOTAL 218 (168) 710 (645) 1637 ug29) 2555(2242) 143.605 437.263 1744.320 2325 188 ' Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

i..

9, .L J. ' ";a _; M i...; t.) -l'Y ~ ' ' cc +'. & - {;, ~ 0 j ? A' I' ' h ~ -a ." ~ ?. / * !. { 0is L J.l,s u- .l )- y ' / (4 }.#, ' .,.b. .g..,Y : ~,. -' ;[. ', 3 - ), .,, [,, T[ %; ' l [% A* f a t - [ f ' y.7f ,jy

. ~

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: PILGRIM (BWR) 1981 - HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) T0" At MAN-REPS STATION UTI LITY CONT RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y C0b "RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 OT iERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYMES & C 'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS 8 $URV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 85 0 126 8.270 0.0 5.335 CPERATING PERSONNEL 45 0 0 27.020 0.0 0.3 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 38 0 18 12.680 0.0 5.510 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 24 0 0 3.205 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 10 0 12 2.135 0.0 0.280 TOTAL 202 0 156 358 53.310 0.0 11.125 64.435"~ e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 85 0 1256 20.340 0.0 207.440 OPERATING PERSONNEL 45 0 0 2.290 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 38 0 165 12.855 0.0 25.080 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 42 18 46 4.035 1.605 2.400 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 12 6 54 5.840 0.195 2.080 TOTAL 222 24 1521 1767 45.360 1.800 237.000 284.160 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PER5ONNEL 15 0 67 0.835 0.0 37.005 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7 0 0 0.265 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 -24 1.315 0.0 1.015 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 0 8 1.850 0.0 0.450 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.150 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 38 0 99 137 4.415 0.0 38.470 42.885 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 85 25 1585 48.945 1.350 893.465 u)0PERATING PERSONNEL 45 0 0 7.135 0.0 0.0 W HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 38 0 103 7.440 0.0 53.560 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 70 146 30 62.900 53.785 3.835 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 26 19 92 12.335 8.090 19.010 TOTAL 264 190 1810 2264 138.755 63.225 969.870 1171.850 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 80 0 280 16.985 0.0 12.925 OPERATING PERSONNEL 38 0 0 20.270 0,0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 32 0 41 4.355 3.0 3.325 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 0 0 1.215 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 9 0 0 1.750 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 167 0 321 488 44.575 0.0 16.250 60.325 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 24 25 150 7.825 8.675 25.065 45 0 0 8.430 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL. 21 0 42 0.255 0.0 1.555 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 14 0 3.025 2.025 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 14 0 0 1.020 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 114 39 192 345 20.555 10.700 26.620 57.875 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINIENANCE PERSONNEL 374 (85) 5 0 (25) 3464 0585) 3888 (1695) 103.200 10.025 1181.235 1294.460 OPERATING PERSONNEL 225 (45) 0 0 225 14 5 l 65.410 0.0 0.0 65.410 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 178 (38) 0 393 0 03) 571 0 41 38.900 0.0 90.045 128.945 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 157 (83) 17,8(146) 84 (30) 419 (259. 76.230 57.415 6.685 140.330 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 73 426) 25 (19) 158 (92) 256 (137 23.230 8.285 21.370 52.885 GRAND TOTAL 1007 (277) 253(190) 4099(1810) 5359 (2277) 306.970 75.725 1299.335 1682.030

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cent.) Plant:IPoint Beach 1, 2 (PWR) l NUMBER OF PERSONNE L (>100 mrem) TOTAL MAN-REMS WORK & JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYE ES & OTHERS PE RSONS EMPLOYE E S EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN REM Reactor Operations & Surv. _Maiotenance Personnel 0.0 _O =rattng. Personnel _ 24J60 I 52.745 Health Physics Permnnd _SupansorL wsonnel [J42 P Engineering Personnel 0.239 TOYAL /8.686 0.703 79.389 Routine Mamtenance Maintenance Personnd _Oprepng Eersonnel 14_605 O_0 Health Physics Personnel _ Supervisory Personnet O_0 O.O Engmeering Personnel 0.0 TOTAL 14.60i_ 0.0 14.60s In-Service Inspection Mamteriance Personnel 70,433_ _O "'8h_ng Personnel 12,338 P Health Physecs Personnel Q.0 Supjerv sory Personnel 886 Engineering Personnel 0.305 TOTAL 41.552 96.364 13/.916 Special Maintenance Mamtenance Personnel 39,gg7 _Operstmg Personnel O_0 _ Health Physecs Personnet n_n Supervisory Personnel DJ Engineermg Personnel n_0 TOTAL 19.A67 24Q FAQ 2RQ E16 Wast _e Processing Maintenance Personnel 0.0 yating Pwsonnet 8.868 Health Physics _ Personnel 3.021 _ Supervisory Personnel. 0.0 Engineering Personnel 0.0 TOHL 11.889 0.0 11.889 Refuelmg _Mamtenance Porsonnel 2P. 604_. _ Operstmg Personnel U$L ._ _ Health Phy9 cs Pwsonnel_ 7 238 i _ Supervisory Person _nel 0.234. Engmeer3 ersonnel 0.493 6 P TOTAL 34.323 0.0 34.323 Total By Job Function Maintenance Pe sonnel gg Int Ego ._ Operating Personnel _ 65 7 U ns ._ Health Physses Personne_l 14 24,110 ._ Supw_visory_ Personnel 12 10.002 Engmeering Personnel 3 1.037 GRAND TOTAL IQ1 ali ??n o?? 346.736 567.658 94

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAH-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT 2 PRAIRIE ISLAND 1,2 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-RE31 TOTAL MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL WORK &_dOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES A OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN-RENS ,LEACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 74 73 46 7.082. 3.427 1.868 OPERATINC PERSONNEL 50 0 0 9.366 0.0 0.322 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 26 0 22 8.062 0.0 2.024 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 0 2 0.882 0.023 0.492 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 4 7 1.088 0.172 0.835 TOTAL 168 77 77 322 26.480 3.622 5.541 35.643 EDMI.lN L.M., A T N T EN A N C E MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 38 38 4 2.638 0.840 0.014 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.006 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.123 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.022 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 1 0.225 0.0 0.021 TOTAL 43 38 5 86 3.014 0.840 0.035 3.889 IN-LERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 33 51 57 5.861 4.677 47.399 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.035 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 10 0 7 0.967 0.0 0.264 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 2 0.010 0.0 0.292 _fNGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 3 15 1.411 1.025 6.030 TOTAL 57 54 81 192 8.284 5.702 53.985 67.971 }f.EQlAL M A THLE. N ANCE NAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 72 136 118 35.914 48.628 36.443 u) 0PERATING PERSONNEL 39 0 0 2.324 C.0 0.0 0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 24 0 15 1.155 0.0 3.323 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 0 6 0.660 0.036 1. 46 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 4 24 3.104 0.897 12.372 TOTAL 150 140 163 453 43.157 49.561 53.284 146.002 MASTE PROCESSING MAINTEHANCE PERSONNEL 33 14 2 2.727 0.984 0.312 OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 0 1 1.090 0.0 0.231 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0 2 2.147 0.0 0.015 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.031 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 68 14 5 87 5.993 0.984 0.558 7.537 RffjlFL ING F MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 45 98 11 12.264 22.964 3.119 OPERATING PERSONNEL 44 0 0 4.031 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 21 0 21 2.488 0.0 5.606 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 2 0.602 0.0 0.129 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 1 1 1.256 0.211 3.223 INTAL 122 99 35 256 20.641 23.175 9.077 52.8a3 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION NAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 295 410 238 943 66.486 81.520 59.155 237.161 OPERATING PERSONNEL 158 0 1 159 16.852 0.0 0.553 17.405 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 94 0 67 161 14.942 0.0 11.232 26.174 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9 0 12 21 2.207 0.059 2.059 4.325 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 52 12 48 112 7.084 2.305 19.481 28.870 GRAND TOTAL 608 422 366 1396 107.571 83.884 122.480 313.935 _ Workers may be counted in more than one category.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PE<5;m.EL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: QU AD CITIES 1:2 fBWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERI?11;t J )100 M-REM) T0"At MAN-REMS STATI )H UTILJfY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y CON"RACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYC c 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 J 0 25.600 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 39 3 0 46.200 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0 0 15.700 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 48 0 0 44.900 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7 11 6 3.700 2.200 5.18S TOTAL 125 11 6 142 136.100 2.200 5.185 143.485 ROUTIHE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 52 64 784 158.700 46.700 1913.200 OPERATING PERSONNEL 8 0 0 11.100 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 8 0 12 11.700 0.0 10.300 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 30 0 0 20.400 0.0 0.0 66 10.700 2.200 52.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 11 862 1057 212.600 48.900 1975.600 2237.103 TOTAL 120 75 __ IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 5 0 76 9.900 0.0 200.500 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 2.200 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 5 0 0 6.500 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 9 0 0 5.800 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 14 11 47 10.800 2.800 32.800 TOTAL 34 11 123 168 35.200 2.800 233.300 271.300 l l SPECIAL MAINTENANCE l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l c OPERATING PERS004EL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C) HEALTH PHYSICS vERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PFRSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WASTE PRQLESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 20 0 29 64.300 0.0 76.600 l OPERATING PERSOHNEL 53 0 14 85.600 0.0 1470.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 15 0 0 19.100 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 63 0 0 26.900 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 0 6 12 0.0 1.200 10.400 TOTAL 151 6 55 212 195.900 1.200 1557.000 1754.100 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERS0HHEL 28 0 0 76.200 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 6 0 0 11.100 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9 0 0 12.200 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONHEL 18 0 0 15.400 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 3 25 3.000 0.800 12.000 TOTAL 64 3 25 92 117.900 0.800 12.000 130.700 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTEHANCE PERSONNEL 118 64 889 1071 334.700 46.700 2190.300 2571.700 OPERATING PERSONNEL 107 0 14 121 156.200 0.0 1470.000 1626.200 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 55 0 12 67 65.200 0.0 10.300 75.500 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 168 0 0 168 113.400 0.0 0.0 113.400 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 46 42 156 244 28.200 9.200 112.485 149.885 GRAND TOTAL 494 106 1071 1671 697.700 55.900 3783.085 4536.685

. APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PE450nddL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT RANCHO SECO 1 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONHO (>100 M-REM) T0'At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY , WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYE$S~~ CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CON"RACT TOTAL 8 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0'HERS MAH-RENS REACTOR OPERATIONS 8 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 71 5 85 4.250 0.140 3.450 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 73 1 83 15.610 0.090 2.890 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 41 1 72 7.850 0.020 25.660 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 20 1 6 1.080 0.0 0.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 40 2 96 3.440 0.040 3.550 TOTAL 245 to 342 597 32.230 0.290 35.650 68.170 o ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 72 5 178 29.380 1.950 3.320 OPERATING PERSONNEL 18 0 4 1.140 0.0 0.040 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 30 0 48 6.850 0.0 6.690 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0 6 2.260 0.0 1.800 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 20 0 75 2.790 0.0 13.670 TOTAL 151 5 311 467 42.420 1.950 25 J20 69.890 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 55 5 223 11.410 0.430 75.590 us OPERATING PERSONNEL 15 0 2 0.400 0.0 0.200 M HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 23 0 43 3.870 0.0 5.070 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 0 9 0.920 0.0 1.910 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 22 2 92 1.930 0.030 8.820 TOTAL 123 7 369 499 18.530 0.460 91.590 110.580 i WASTE PROCESSING l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 41 1 95 2.060 0.030 19.650 OPERATING PERSONNEL 12 0 1 0.380 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 30 0 15 7.760 0.0 29.640 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 4 0.030 0.0 0.680 _ ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 3 0 2 0.010 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 91 1 117 209 10.240 0.030 49.970 60.240 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 2 SG 1.750 0.050 9.190 OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 1 0 2.440 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 0 17 0.260 0.0 0.680 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 4 0.390 0.0 0.930 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 0 31 0.700 0.0 4.370 TOTAL 61 3 102 166 5.540 0.050 15.170 29.760 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTEHANCE PERSOHNEL 261 18 631 910 48.850 2.600 111.200 162.650 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 140 2 90 232 19.970 0.090 3.130 23.190 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 130 1 195 326 26.590 0.020 67.740 94.350 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 49 1 29 79 4.680 0.0 5.420 10.100 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 91 4 296 391 8.870 0.070 30.410 39.350 GRAND TOTAL 671 26 1241 1938 108.960 2.780 217.900 329.640 e Workers may be counted in more than one category. (, .. N. ' '., g-g.)- ' ,,s t-1: .*s ~. [. ; '. ~ +. '.:, ' }, ^ ;- D.it. J F '., 'j')>.. W.' s,; [ JJ,. },' % ' ~ ' ' ; T i.. f. r,. '.f '. y 5} s,.. J j -l 7. j .r 1 r y. _, n - c-n .. i-5,. p,', I g* 4 'a+4, .M, ',"Y-- , [-

s. r*

_ * * *,, lJ, y 4, ' .'. s - _ v e w .x...

e,_y

. ( <j _ ;w , g.= _. m ., y g.. y s .. ~.

APPENDIX C (Cod.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND s0B FUNCTION PLANT ROBINS 0W 2 (PWR) 1081 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>10D M-REM) T0"Al MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONT RAC TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CONTRACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 OT iERb PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN-REMS ^ REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 2 0 0 1.258 0.091 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 29 0 0 22.837 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 7 2 1 6.938 3.082 0.389 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 1 1 0.191 0.154 0.407 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8 2 0 3.736 0.877 0.0 TOTAL 47 5 2 54 34.960 4.204 0.796 39.960 B.RQIINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 22 1 24 26.990 0.143 19.307 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 6 1 8 6.254 1.941 5.043 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 2 6 0 1.050 0.132 0.0 TOTAL 30 2_ 32 64 34.294 2.216 24.350 60.860 JH-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.140 0.0 0.0 OPERAlING PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.141 0.015 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONHEL 4 0 0 4.232 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 5 0 0 5 4.513 0.015 0.0 4.528 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 33 1 323 40.420 0.303 352.037 m OPERATING PERSONNEL 3 0 0 1.892 0.0 0.0 03 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 5 44 17.627 7.781 24.451 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 24 6 66 14.751 4.145 42.820 TOTAL 74 12 433 519 74.690 12.229 419.308 506.227 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 1 14 11.644 0.085 11.332 GPERATING PERSONNEL 17 0 0 13.335 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 2 1 2 2.200 0.687 0.910 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.552 0.055 0.0 TOTAL 30 2 16 46 27.731 0.827 12.242 40.800 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 1.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERJNG PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IDTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 68 3 361 432 80.452 0.622 382.676 463.750 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 49 0* 0 49 38.064 0.0 0.0 38.064 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 29 9 55 93 33.160 13.506 30.793 77.459 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 1 1 1 3 0.191 0.154 0.407 0.752 ENGINEERIHG PERSOHHEL 39 8 66 113 24.321 5.209 42.820 72.350 GRAND TOTAL 186 21 483 690 176.188 19.491 456.696 652.375 i b, '....~ ' - t ; s e..', t ',,. V. a :. g '. ; '., + -"' 'c ' _4,,,;

.* f y

.1 (.g', .w ~ i

• 4&

-s ^ (,' .M,.}. ij

• , p _.

' ",'. e - ' 7 6 E 'N, t-r 5

- s oa e f,. ' y'

. :. g. 1.. ',. 2,W . i. ,.,. j,. . s... r 4 .... ~, ,,.; s...,. . ;-, m ,.l . t .: c,;...,. y..' ' u. 7 L x *. : ..y., -

.

.. e.

.y 3,( s.,..- .,,g, j r.

.,.4, q 7

.;s. y.. { r t, w. 1, .,s*

3.. y. ; ,.r . r .z.. j ., 7.,.r,..-_. ,,,c _, y. .s 7 _e. ..~ -.n4__ _,e-g. 7-( APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT tSALEM 1 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) TOTAL MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITV CON"RACT TOTAL WORK 3 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOY 2ES 4 0'NERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.407 0.0 0.15C OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 u 1.060 0.0 0.070 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.464 0.0 0.774 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.010 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.010 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 1 0 0 1 1.951 0.0 0.994 2.945 RDUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6 0 0 3.280 0.010 0.185 OPERATING PERSO: Scl 0 0 0 0.030 0.0 0.020 HEALTH PHYSICS PcRSONNEL 0 0 1 0.235 0.0 0.445 SUPERVISORY PERSOMNEL 1 0 0 0.165 0.0 0.0 _ ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 7 0 1 8 3.710 0.010 0.650 4.370 IN-SERM CE INSPECTIRN MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 8 0 10 3.457 0.0 4.685 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.235 0.0 0.030 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.232 0.0 0.555 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.485 0.0 0.235 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.145 0.115 0.460 TOTAL 9 0 11 20 4.554 0.115 5.965 10.634 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 102 0 171 46.098 6.135 73.959 u) OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 0 2.190 0.0 0.265 G HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 11 0 51 4.197 0.0 19.254 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7 0 1 2.619 0.0 1.510 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 4 0.237 0.060 0.215 TOTAL 122 0 227 349 55.341 0.195 95.203 150.739 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5 0 2 1.599 0.0 0.915 OPERATING ~ RSONNEL 0 0 1 0.075 0.0 0.415 HEALTH PH) ICS PERSONNEL 3 0 1 1.365 0.0 0.452 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 0 0 1.035 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.010 0.0 0.e TOTAL 11 0 4 15 4.084 0.0 1.782 5.866 REFUELINH_ MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.140 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.140 0.0 0.0 0.140 IPTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 122 0 183 305 54.981 0.145 79.894 135.020 OPERATING PERSONNEL 2 0 1 3 3.590 0.0 0.800 4.390 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 14 0 53 67 6.493 0.0 21.480 27.973 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 12 0 1 13 4.314 0.0 1.745 6.059 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 5 5 0.402 0.175 0.675 1.252 GRAND YOTAL 150 0 243 393 69.780 0.320 104.594 174.694 ..i..*,4 g jy - 1 8, n.- +. ~.~i.... -a ....e. 7, y, e... - - -.. a., .. -{ ,,f ;,

• '.?

.h. h. ~ f ] . [ '. 2-3 /

• . J7 l

w . }. ; ;,

• E: -,.

t.) .: ;~ %f, [.; a, 7.. _ k,, f. p y. .. 3.;;.. ;.3J_'.:;'l*,, <? ,. - _ f J.,. j [ 9 .~ .. c

I' APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PE420 s.<EL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCT20N PLANT SAN ONOFRE 1 (PWR) 1981 T0"At MAN-REM $ NUMBER OF PERSON _Niq(JJ_10_0 M-REM) STATION UTILITf_,, CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI'Y COH"RACT TOTAL WORK 3 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES, 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMP L O Y lies & 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS 4 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 12 0 16 2.080 0.0 6.730 OPER ATING PER$0HNEL 14 0 12 14.790 0.0 3.490 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 8 0 96 1.530 0.0 39.970 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 10 0 8 5.210 0.0 7.240 ENGINEERING PERSONt!EL 14 1 19 6.720 0.150 10.860 TOTAL 58 1 151 210 30.330 0.150 68.290 98.770 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MtINTENANCE PERSONNEL 68 19 1496 63.600 7.830 2736.220 OPERATING PERSOHHEL 9 0 29 1.470 0.0 16.720 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 9 0 187 5.670 0.0 149.120 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 1 37 4.460 0.370 19.720 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 10 3 88 2.330__ 0.840 68.280 TOTAL 104 23 1837 1964 77.530 9.040 2990.060 3076.630 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0' OPERATING PERSOHHEL HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERS6HHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 1 3 0.0 0.110 1.250 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEt.LTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 a 0.120 0.0 1.940 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 11 13 0.120 0.110 3.190 3.420 TOTAL REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINT ENANCE PERSO:4HEL 80 (70) 20 09) 1515 0 501) 1615 0 590) 65.680 7.940 2744.200 2817.820 OPERATING PERSONNEL 23(21) 0 41 (46) 64 (67) 16.260 0.0 20.210 36.470 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 04) 0 291 (206) 309 (229) 7.320 0.0 191.030 198.350 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 18 01) 1 45 (41) 64 (53L 9.670 0.370 26.960 37.000 9.050 0.900 19.140 89.180 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 24 08) 4 107 11011 135 0 23 GRAND TOTAL 163(134) 25 (24) 1999 (1895) 218 7,Q053l 107.980 9.300 3061.540 3178.820

• Workers may be counted it. more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: ST. LUCIE (PWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) T0'At MAH-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRAC" TOTAL STATION UlllI"Y COH'RACT TOTAL e WORK 2 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS S SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 25 0 0 7.000 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 22 0 17 6.400 0.0 5.300 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 47 0 17 64 13.400 0.0 5.300 18.700 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 106 27 0 35.800 18.000 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 16 0 0 4.400 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 21 0 2 6.200 0.0 0.600 SUPERVISORY PERSONNfl 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PER$0HNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 143 27 2 172 46.400 18.000 0.600 65.000 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 43 33 60 14.600 22.900 49.300 OPERATING PERSONNEL 21 0 0 5.800 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0 16 3.500 0.0 5.000 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 4 3 5 3.100 0.0 2.400 14 0.300 1.000 5.400 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 3 95 213 27.300 23.900 62.100 113.300 TOTAL 82 34 __ SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTEHANCE PERSONNEL 118 39 584 39.500 26.500 411.800 -' OPERATING PERSONNEL 18 0 0 4.900 0.0 0.0 SS HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 17 0 52 4.900 0.0 16.100 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 7 0 8 5.500 0.0 4.200 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 6 15 0.500 2.100 5.800 TOTAL 164 45 659 868 55.300 28.600 437.900 521.800 e WASTE PiOCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 64 12 0 21.200 8.400 0.0 l OPERATING PERSONHEL 15 0 0 4.100 0.0 0.0 l HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 13 0 11 3.700 0.0 3.400 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 6 0 0 2.700 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERIEG PERSONNEL 2 0 0 0.100 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 100 12 11 123 31.800 8.400 3.400 43.600 e EffUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 119 66 0 39.900 44.500 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 47 0 0 12.700 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 18 0 64 4.900 0.0 19.900 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 6 2.000 0.0 3.000 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 189 67 70 326 59.500 44.500 22.900 126.900 e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 450 (134) 177 '(82) 644 NG6) 1271 (852) 151.000 120.300 461.100 732.400 OPERATING PERSONNEL 142 161) 0 0 142 Ni1) 38.900 0.0 0.0 38.900 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 103 (25) 0 162 (70) 265 (96 1 29.600 0.0 50.300 79.900 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 22 (9) 0 19 (15) 41 (24 13.300 0.0 9.600 22.900 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 8 (7) 10 (8) 29 (27) 47 (42l 0.900 3.100 11.200 15.200 l GRAND TOTAL 725 (236) 187 (90) 854 (748) 1766(1074) 233.700 123.400 532.200 889.300

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

l y 4 E, a a4, g ty 'g-i 6 *y- [ [ " [Mi ? g., i l\\ Q.'-i-l ;.} eg 3 mil's.., . [ ". ;j gg ' '[ ].g, J _ y *:. ' { y f ]1 0 -[

y.,

3 m.;, - mm. w.

y ',, m w

m_ k_ -=- e 3 h h APPENDIX C (Cont.) Plant: Surry 1, 2 (PWR) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 mrem) TOTAL MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL ?_ WORK & JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES E MPLOYE E S & OTHERS PE RSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS MAN REM g

• Reactor Operations & Sury.

= Mamtenance Personnel _Operatmg_ Personnel _ Health _P_hysics Personnel

g

_Supwvi orL wsonnd_ t P Engineermg Personnel TOTAL ann a7 0 ans 1;s inn 30.20A n_n 1RA 516 r Routine Maintenance ~- Mamtenance Personnel Operstmg Personnel Health Phdics Personnel Y ~ _ Supervisory Personnel Enginee_ ring Personnel 9 TOTAL Z80 0 0 280 614.315 u.u u.u ble. Jib =-

• Inservice Inspection A

Mamtenance Personnel E _Operstmg Personnei _ Health Physics Personnel Supemsory_ Pe_rs_ on_nd - Engneering Personnel '~ T6TAL A A a7 An 6.RR4 4 72R 21 nal 17 KE1 7

• Special Maintenance T

Mamtenance Personnel w _Operstmg Personnel __Hea[thpysics Pwenel __Supeivisory Personnel 4 Engmeerma Personnel m TOTAL 4 141 2945 3090 4.070 60.295 2723.723 77RR tmR 'Wrte Procewing Mamtenance Personnel _Operatmg Personnel _ Health Physics Personnel _Supennsory Personnel Enyneering Personnel TOTAL 4 n 7 A in 9na nn 1 749 11 aq1 ' Rafueling Maintenance Personnel _Healthpysics_P_ersonnel_ Y Operating _ ~ _Supa_visory P=sonnd Enyneering Personnd TOTAL 7 5 1 11 1 104 n n7q n nin 1 ant 7

• Totai sy Job Function

_Mamtenance_ Personnel _Operstmg _Pwenal _H=Lth_ Physics _Pwsonnd_ _Supwvi_sorL ersonnd P Engineering Personnel W 247 2900 TQ7a aal nne at si n 2:a6 sai 3834.926 . GRAND TOTAL Warhers may be counted 6n more than one ateeory. b "noutin ace

6ncludn 2s40 mannms from steam pnerator inspection and repair.

102 ~ 7

APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION t PLANTS THREE MILE ISLAND 1 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) T0"Al MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CON"RACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CON'RACT TOTAL WORK 1 JOB FUNCTION' EMPLOY EES EMPLOYEES & 0"HERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 0'HERS MAN-RE'1S e REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. NAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 161 8 100 2.145 0.024 0.811 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1/8 29 40 10.824 0.143 0.351 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 81 1 21 11.071 0.0 0.175 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 53 5 13 0.439 0.034 0.040 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 63 34 31 0.735 0.114 0.248 TOTAL 536 77 205 818 25.214 0.315 1.625 27.154 h00TINEMAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 18 1 15 116 19.127 0.217 0.707 CPERATING PERSONNEL 140 5 47 1.241 0.043 0.597 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 65 2 18 1.649 0.0 0.140 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 47 6 9 0.992 0.057 0.028 ENGINEERING PERSONNEt 36 16 23 0.365 0.010 0.056 TOTAL 469 44 213 726 23.374 0.327 1.528 25.229 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION NAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 80 1 73 0.673 0.0 0.820 OPERATING PERSONNEL 104 8 39 0.808 0.175 1.761 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 49 3 4 2.709 0.007 0.030 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 26 2 5 0.255 0.018 0.012 ENGINEERING PERS0hNEL 35 29 48 0.340 0.722 1.119 TOTAL 294 43 169 506 4.785 0.922 3.742 9.449 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE , MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 181 23 426 9.830 2.258 105.264 o CPERATING PERSONHEL 152 18 63 2.802 0.314 5.176 W HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 61 1 12 1.501 0.0 0.237 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 52 5 30 1.531 0.054 2.!70 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 55 41 71 3.454 0.463 6.933 TOTAL 501 88 602 1191 19.118 3.089 119.780 141.987 e WASTE PROCESSING MAIN (EHANCE PERSOHNEL 99 7 47 10.922 0.349 1.200 OPERATING PERSONNEL 79 1 10 7.476 0.009 2.725 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 44 0 7 1.011 0.0 0.020 l SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 14 2 3 0.410 0.002 0.160 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 12 5 4 0.258 0.002 0.140 TOTAL 248 15 71 334 20.077 0.362 4.245 24.684 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PER3ONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEEBING PERSOHHEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 4 0 1 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTEHANCE PERSONNEL 705 (216) 54 (22) 762 (447) 1521 (689) 42.697 2.848 108.802 154.347 OPERATING PERSONNEL 654 (218) 61 (42) 200 (92) 915 (352) 23.151 0.684 10.610 34.445 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 300 (8:7) 7 (4) 62 (42) 369 (1 33) 17.941 0.007 0.602 18.550 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 192 (78) 20 (10) 60.(3S) 272 (1231 3.627 0.165 2.410 6.202 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 201 (SS) 12c (67) 177 (111) 503 (263 5.152 1.311 8.496 14.959 GRAND TOTAL 2052 (EB4) 264 (149) 1261 (727) 358 011SW3 42.563 5.015 130.920 228.503

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

- -} *\\ ,,- [ .;b i j

• }.-

[.,, _ ..,, i, l-l l 9 } J* f, f,. _^ _ ' - _x , s. er r - J. ' [. ' ',, ... e [. ~ h ll i*. :r. A . h.n. ,Tz

. '3 n.

~. s

e, w q

L;*.. ~i e .**yx (,g,_, q- $. .K '., y-p' s,t.p' 7, , - j a . {.. ~ l g,.. w ,s y r ' n '$s ,..,..e P g .c m 's,,- .3 4 (,- } 4

APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBER OF PExsa...iEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT:tTHREE MILE ISL AND 2 (PKR) 1981 9 UMBER OF PER10ggei (>100 M-REM) Ip'At MAH-REMS STATI )N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y COH'RACT TOTA 1 . WORK 2 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYE45 4 OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0'HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS 8 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 95 18 52

6. 160 1.804 0.508 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 67 6

18 2.863 0.136 0.459 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 38 6 65 4.176 0.066 4.498 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 16 3 7 1.214 0.022 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 7 9 20 0.319 0.311 2.040 TOTAL 223 42 162 427 14.75? 2.339 7.50S 24.576 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE i MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 95 11 57 1.866 0.193 0.487 l GPERATING PERSONNEL 40 3 12 0.683 0.072 0.108 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 4 31 0.484 0.106 0.508 SU'ERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0 7 0.119 0.0 0.032 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 3 5 0.022 0.101 0.015 TOTAL 163 21 112 246 3.174 0.472 1.150 4.796 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 6 1 2 0.080 0.075 0.010 OPERATING PERSONNEL 12 1 3 0.053 0.0 0.035 HEALTH Pl!YSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 5 0.044 0.0 0.090 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 2 0 0 0.002 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 2 1 0.020 0.0 0.005 TOTAL 28 4 11 43 0.199 0.075 0.140 0.414 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 150 42 172 16.227 9.960 13.679 $ OPERATING PERSOHNEL 120 21 54 9.504 5.207 8.107 A HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 61 19 110 5.992 7.739 17.785 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 48 6 23 3.104 0.247 2.357 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 31 29 71 1.570 3.670 9.837 TOTtt 410 117 430 957 36.397 26.823 51.765 114.985 I WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 121 23 105 2.416 1.116 0.806 OPERATING PERSONNEL 142 22 56 4.541 0.158 1.172 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 57 9 93 1.362 0.192 3.560 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 59 12 20 0.993 0.096 0.045 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 32 28 69 0.353 0.327 0.928 TCTAL 411 94 343 348 9.665 1.889 6.511 18.065 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 5 2 5 0.0 0.009 0.010 OPERATING PERSONNEL 13 0 4 0.031 0.0 0.030 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 11 0.079 0.0 0.100 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHHEL 0 1 1 0.0 0.005 0.002 TOTAL 25 3 22 50 0.110 0.014 0.142 0.266 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 472 (159) 97 (45) 393 (178) 962 (382) 26.749 13.157 15.500 55.4C6 OPERATING PERSONNEL 394 U M) 53 (34) 147 (80) 594 (268) 17.675 5.573 9.911 33.159 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 182 (67) 38 (21) 315 4116) 535 (204) 12.137 8.103 26.541 46.781 SUPERVISDRY PERSONNEL 136 (68) 21 03? 58 (311 215 012) 5.432 0.365 2.434 8.231 ENGINEER 1YG PERSONNEL 76 (37) 72 (36 167 UG4) 315_076) 2.284 4.414 12.827 19.525 1080 (549) 2621(1142) 64.277 31.612 67.213 163.102 GRAND TOTAL 1260 (485) 281 (148 i

• Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: TROJAN (PWR) 1981 HUMBER OF PERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) T0"At MAN-REMS STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTIL1"Y CONTRACT TOTAL e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & 01MERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS S SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 9 0 0.0 4.970 0.210 OPERATING PERSONNEL 38 0 0 15.210 0.0 0.050 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 32 0 92 17.300 0.030 51.910 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 2 0 4 1.150 0.030 4.390 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 15 15 5 8.780 9.160 2.400 TOTAL 87 24 101 212 42.440 14.190 58.960 115.590 e ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 38 16 6 23.630 6.580 3.560 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 1 0 0.150 0.130 0.070 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 1 0 0 0.250 0.0 0.040 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 2 2 0.490 0.810 0.660 TOTAL 41 19 6 68 24.520 7.520 4.330 36.370 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 59 120 341 33.420 101.750 257.850 $ OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.020 ul HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOMNEL 0 0 6 0.L60 0.060 1.650 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 5 32 0.060 1.680 12.810 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 0 7 0.580 0.020 2.65P TOTAL 61 125 386 572 34.120 103.510 274.980 412.610 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.050 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 1 0.030 0.0 0.770 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9 0 0 3.610 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONHEL 0 0 0 0.040 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.010 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 9 0 1 to 3.690 0.0 0.820 4.510 e EEFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 5 11 19 3.720 17.040 24.600 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 0 0 5 0.0 0.0 1.240 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 8 0.0 0.0 3.520 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 2 0 6 0.970 0.0 2.580 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 2 0.010 0. f,4 0 0.560 TOTAL 7 11 40 58 4.700 17.180 32.500 54.280

• TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 102 156 366 624 60.770 130.340 286.270 477.380 OPERATING PERSONNEL 38 0

6 44 15.240 0.0 2.080 17.320 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSCNNEL 41 1 106 148 21.120 0.220 57.150 78.490 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 5 5 42 52 2.470 1.710 19.820 24.000 ENGINEERING PCRSONNEL 19 17 16 52 9.870 10.030 6.270 26.170 GRAND TOTAL 205 179 536 920 109.470 142.300 371.590 623.360 e Corkers may be counted in more than one category.

___= APPENDIX C (Cont.) NL'MBER OF PERSOHHEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION ELA37: TURKEY POINT 3.4 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PER$QNNEL (>100 M-REM) T0"AL MAL,*JM1 STATION UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y ' TRACT TOTAL WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. _ ;THERS MAN-REMS MAINTENANCE PERSOHNEL 141 17 387 65.620 4.555 122.889 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 26 1 0 35.112 0.210 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 27 0 98 18.647 0.020 55.975 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 19 0 7 8.196 0.125 2.415 j ENGINEERING PERSONNEt 27 2 93 11.921 0.891 29.407 TOTAL 240 20 585 845 139.496 5.801 210.686 355.983 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTEHANCE PERSONNEL 100 15 166 63.649 6.260 106.867 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 4 0 0 1.888 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4 0 84 0.971 0.0 52.494 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 1.090 0.060 0.035 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 4 0 3 2.925 0.020 2.045 TOTAL 113 15 253 381 70.523 6.340 161.441 238.304 IH-SERVICE INSPECTION l MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 68 8 336 49.170 9.130 332.963 OPERATING PERSONNEL 7 0 1 2.560 0.065 0.420 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 40 2.495 0.0 32.340 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 8 2 12 4.380 0.375 6.??6 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 5 3 414 522 25 2.380 0.870 16.450 TOTAL 95 13 _. _. 60.985 10.440 389.079 460.504 SPECIAL MAINTENANCE _. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 80 10 1227 45.111 5.020 1359.871 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0 0 3.992 0.0 0.0 g HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL to 1 148 5.378 0.595 164.809 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 1 18 3.100 0.210 5.740 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL '9 6_ 67 10.650 1.439 60.759 TOTAL 134 18 1460 1612 68.231 7.264 1591.179 1666.674 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 16 2 11 19.261 1.030 5.706 OPERATING PERSOHNEL 2 0 0 0.501 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONHEL 6 0 25 7.846 0.0 18.780 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 2 0 0 0.648 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 0 1m 335 0.0 0.060 TOTAL 27 2 36 65 29.591 1.030 24.546 55.167 REFUELING 9AINTENANCE PERSONNEL 72 6 55 85.180 12.340 18.950 OPERATING PERSONNEL 19 1 0 9.695 0.330 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 18 0.455 0.0 11.945 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 0 1.319 0.0 0.040 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 6 1 3 6.470 0.105 1.530 TOTAL 103 8 76 187 103.119 12.775 32.515 148.409 TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 477 (165) 58 U2) 2182 0509) 2717 0 696) 327.991 38.335 1947.246 2313.572 OPERATING PERSONNEL 72 (44) 2 0) 1 (1) 75 (46) 53.748 0.605 0.420 54.773 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 55 (30) 1 (1) 413 (207) 469 008) 35.792 0.615 336.343 372.750 (32 3 (3) 37 (25) 86 (60) 18.733 0.770 15.136 34.639 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 46 (38)) 12 (10) 191 41 341-265 (182) 35.681 3.325 110.301 149.307 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 62 GRAND TOTAL 712 009) 76 (37) 2824 (1876) 3 612 (>>>>) 471.945 43.650 2409.446 2925.041 ' Workers may be counted in more than one category. Numbers in parentheses are total numbers of individuals.

APPENDIX C (Cont.) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JCB FUNCTION PLANT: VE2MONT YANKEE ([Wgl 1981 MMB.RER OF PEtSONNEL (>100 M-RFM) TOTAL MAN-RE'$ "RACT TOTAL STATION UTI LITY CONTRAC" TOTAL STATION UTILITY C0i WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEE 4 EMPLOYEES a OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES A Q'NERS MA1-RER5 REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 13 2 to 8.950 1.530 3.650 OPERATING PERSONNEL 56 0 0 49.640 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNE8 24 0 35 21.260 0.0 15.620 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.530 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 24 0 7 11.370 0.0 2.510 TOTAL 118 2 52 172 91.750 1.530 21.780 115.060 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 51 112 575 74.642 56.490 246.469 OPERATING PERSONNEL 27 0 0 11.250 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 15 2.164 0.0 7.193 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 2 1 1 1.422 0.163 0.140 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 13 0 1 3.582 0.0 0.440 TOTAL 100 113 592 305 93.060 56.653 254.242 403.955 -) IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENAt4E PERSONNEL 0 26 31 0.110 47.205 37.374 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.110 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.030 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.055 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 2 2 0 1.150 1.970 0.0 TOTAL 2 28 31 61 1.425 49.175 37.404 88.004 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 2 110 0.0 0.320 73.885 $ OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.3 N HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.060 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 2 110 112 0.060 0.320 73.885 74.265 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 5 0 0.829 1.410 0.040 OPERATING PERSONNEL 17 0 0 3.225 G.O. 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.260 0.0-0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 20 5 0 25 4.314 1.410 0.040 5.764 REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 16 3 2.420 3.640 0.910 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.820 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.020 0.0 0.090 SUPERVISORY PERSOMMEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSDJdJt 3 0 0 0.620 0.0 0.060 TOTAL 13 16 3 32 3.880 3.640 1.060 8.580 _ e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 76 163 729 ?68 86.951 110.595 362.328 559.874 OPERATING PERSONNEL 100 0 0-100 65.045 0.0 0.0 65.045 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 32 0 50 82 23.764 0.0 22.933 46.697 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 1 1 5 2.0C7 0.163 0.140. 2.310 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 42 2 8 52 16.722 1.970 3.010 21.702 GRAND TOTAL 253 166 788 1207 194.489 112.728 388.411 695.628

• Workers may be cmsnted in more than one seestory W W"

s. APPENDIX C (Cont.) HUMBEP OF PERSOHNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT YANKEE-RCWE (PWR) 1981 1 UMBER OF FERSONNEL (>100 M-REM) IgfAL MAN-REMS STATI )N UTILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATION UTILI"Y CON"RACT TOTAL e WORK 8 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOY EES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES 8 0"HERS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS & SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 8 0 0.693 1.956 0.020 GPERATING PERSONNEL 6 0 0 2.156 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4 0 1 0.910 0.0 0.638 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 0 0 1 0.030 0.0 0.147 ENGINEERIPG PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.145 0.0 0.C TOTAL 12 8 2 22 3.934 1.956 0.805 6.695 e EDUTINE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 15 24 6 6.305 7.343 3.070 CPERATING PERSONNEL 9 0 0 ?.165 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PER!ONNEL 5 0 12 1.465 0.0 3.390 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.350 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING FERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.120 0.020 0.0 TOTAL 30 24 18 72 10.405 7.363 6.460 24.228 e IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSON 1EL 1 to 8 0.230 2.764 5.955 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.105 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHNEL 2 0 0 0.990 0.0 0.265 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 1 0.090 0.040 0.150 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 3 3 6 2.630 0.735 5.600 TOTpt 6 13 15 34 4.045 3.539 11.970 19.554 e SPECIAL MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 24 70 63 19.156 54.011 29.501 $ OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 0 0 7.277 0.0 0.0 00 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 9 0 39 3.172 0.0 24.094 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 4 0.375 0.0 1.098 _fMRINEERING PERSONNEL 5 3 0 3.760 1.055 0.015 TOTAL 61 73 106 240 33.750 55.066 54.708 143.524 e WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSOHHEL 5 5 1 1.304 1.760 0.710 OPERATING PERSONNEL 14 0 0 4.252 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 5 0 32 2.487 0.0 34.425 SUPERVISORY PERSOHHEL 0 0 J 0.0 0.0 0.065 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.139 0.0 TOTAL 24 5 33 62 8.043 1.894 $5.200 45.137 e REFUELING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 10 5 3 2.410 1.895 0.930 OPERATING PERSONNEL 22 0 0 10.055 0.0_ 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 4 0 24 0.835 0.0 9.250 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 1 0 0 0.190 0.0 0.120 ENGINEERING PERSOHNEL 2 0 0 0.725 0.241 0.135 TOTAL 39 5 27 71 14.215 2.136 19.41) 26.71L__ e TOTAL BY JOB FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 57 122 81 260 30.108 69.729 40.186 140.023 OPERATING PERSONNEL 73 0 0 73 26.010 0.0 0.0 26.010 HEALTH PHYSICS PERS3NNEL 29 0 108 137 9.859 0.0 72.062 81.921 SUPERVISORY PERSOHNEL 3 0 6 9 1.035 0.040 1.580 2.655 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 10 6 6 22 7.380 2.185 5.750 15.315 GRAND TOTAL 172 128 201 501 74.392 71.954 117.573 265.924

• Workers may be counted m more than one category.

h

i I

.N. ,, y ,]. h ;. ' ; f M I yJ',,, .. [ y, T U. f ~,,, E ,,k(.

1. . a. y 7..

s c., w y n.f.s

g. my.3.. g.

q t,

APPENDIX C iCo.:t.) HUMBER OC PERSONNEL AND MAN-REM BY WORK AND JOB FUNCTION PLANT: ZION 1,2 (PWR) 1981 NUMBER OF PFRSONNEL (>100 M-REM 2 TOTAL MAH-REM 1 STATION U'.ILITY CONTRACT TOTAL STATLpH UTILITY CONTR3CT TOTAL WCRK 4 JOB FUNCTION EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTHERS PERSONS EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEES & OTRFRS MAN-REMS REACTOR OPERATIONS 4 SURV. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 2 0 0 3.800 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 43 0 0 20.100 0.0 3.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 12 0 0 11.000 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 0 0 1.000 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PEPSONNEL 30 4 0 8.800 1.300 0.0 TOTAL 90 4 0 94 44.700 1 300 0.0 46.000 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE 106 56 435 229.000 38.100 711.800 MAINTEHANCE PEPSONNEL OPERATING PERSONNEL 31 0 0 52.900 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 26 0 ?5 34.000 0.0 27.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 44 0 0 30.900 0.0 0.0 _ ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 1 0 7 1.400 0.0 4.000 TOTAL 208 55 457 721 348.200 38.100 742.800 1129.100 IN-SERVICE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 89 0.0 0.0 203.000 OPERATING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 22 0 35 17.000 0.0 63.000 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 11 0 0 4.800 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 26 51 0.0 7.200 54.800 TOTAL 33 26 175 234 21.300 7.200 320.800 349.800 SPECIAL MAIHTENANCE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $ OPERATING PERSONNLL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 c HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SUPFRVISORY PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WASTE PROCESSING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 12 0 0 16.300 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSONNEL 7 0 0 7.200 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 5 0 0 2.200 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 11 0 0 9.300 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 35 0 0 35 35.000 0.0 0.0 35.000 REFUELING MATNTENANCE PERSONNEL 5 0 0 10.800 0.0 0.0 OPERATING PERSONNEL 5 0 0 4.700 0.0 0.0 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 3 0 0 3.600 0.0 0.0 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 3 0 0 4.300 0.0 0.0 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 16 0 0 16 23.400 0.0 0.0 23.400 TOTAL BY JOS FUNCTION MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL 113 56 524 693 243.600 38.100 914.500 1196.500 OPERATING PERSONNEL 91 0 0 91 94.000 0.0 0.0 94.000 HEALTH PHYSICS PERSOHHEL 70 0 50 120 72.800 0.0 90.000 162.800 SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL 66 0 0 66 43.200 a.0 0.0 43.200 ENGINEERING PERSONNEL 42 30 58 130 19.500 8.500 58.800 86.800 GRAND TOTAL 382 86 632 1100 473.100 46.600 1063.600 1583.300

$RCloRu 335 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULOTORY COMESSIO BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA SHEET NUREG-0713, Vol. 3

4. TITLE AN D SUBTITLE (Add Volume Na, af apprmnate)

2. (Leave blank)

Occupational Radiation Exposure at Comercial Nuclear Power Reactors - 1981

3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.

7. AUTHORtS)

5. DATE REPORT COMPLETED M ON TH l YEAR Barbara G. Brooks September 1982

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION N AME AND MAILING ADDRESS //nclude Zip Code /

OATE REPORT ISSUED U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MONTH l YEAR Office of Resource Management November 1982 Management Infomation Branch 88*"*' Washington, D.C. 20555 g 7L,,,,,,,,,,

12. SPONSOR NG ORGANIZATION N AME AND MAILING ADDRESS (/nclude tip Codel

10. PROJECT / TASK / WORK UNJT NO.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coninission Office of Resource Management

11. CONTR ACT NO.

Management Infonnation Branch Washington, D.C. 20555

13. TYPE OF REPORT PE RIOD COV E RE D (Inclusive dams)

Annual Calendar Year 1981

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14- (Leave n/8"*/

16. ABSTR ACT t200 words or less)

This report stanarizes the occupational radiation exposure information that has been reported to the U.S.N.R.C. by coninercial nuclear power reactors during the years 1969 through 1981. The bulk of the data presented in the report was obtained from annual radiation exposure reports submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 20.407 and license technical specifications. Data on workers terminating their employ-ment at nuclear power facilities was obtained from reports submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 20.408. The annual reports submitted by the 71 nuclear power plants that had completed at least one full year of operation as of December 31, 1981, indicated that the number of personnel monitored during 1981 was 124,506 persons and the annual collective dose incurred by these individuals was 54,142 man-rems. The average annual dose for each worker that received a measurable dose was 0.7 rems, and the average collective dose per reactor was 773 man-rems. The tennination reports revealed that some 64,500 individuals completed their employment with one or more reactor facilities during 1980.* Approximately 5,500 of these workers could be considered transients and they received an average dose of about one rem.

• The most recent year for which all of the termination data are available for analysis.

17. KE Y WOHDS AND DOCUME NT AN ALYSIS 1 74 DE SC HIP 10 HS Not Applicable 17tt IDENTIFIE PS!OPEN ENDED TERMS

18. AV AILABILITY S I ATEMENT 19 SE CURITY C L ASS (Th<s reporr/

21 NO OF PAGES ""d " # "d Unlimited 20 SECURITY CLASS ITh,s pap / 22 PRICE fine la cci find S NRC FORM 335 (7 77) + .e c 4 jy.y.jh'5

UNITED STATES Fou sin ct Ass man NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION P031'G,3 8,'E f 3 PA'O E WASHINGTON, C.C. 20356 masa o c PE nuit n. In OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE. 4"100 E. T [- 4 E = sf .a 1/059501837/ 1 159nPMANN3 (J S NRL ADM dlV Of 1IDL = P U l I (, Y & Pdat10ATIONS '1 G T dh PUR NUREG GGPY g LA /t/ N A Stt! NG I UN M. / d % 's c 0 F-E' M m T b F T 5 -}}