ML20070H221
| ML20070H221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1982 |
| From: | Longenecker J ENERGY, DEPT. OF, CLINCH RIVER BREEDER REACTOR PLANT |
| To: | Check P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| HQ:S:82:152, NUDOCS 8212230263 | |
| Download: ML20070H221 (25) | |
Text
.
O Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20545 Docket No. 50-537 HQ S:82:152 DEC 211982 Mr. Paul S. Check, Director CRBR Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Check:
MEETING
SUMMARY
FOR THE RELIABILITY PROGRAM MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1982 The purpose of this letter is to summarize the resolution of items discussed between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant project on December 20, 1982. is the list of attendees, Enclosure 2 is the agreements and commitments from the meeting, and Enclosure 3 is the handouts.
Any questions regarding the information provided or further activities can be addressed to A. Meller (FTS 626-6355) or E. Wittry (FTS 626-6099) of the Project Office Oak Ridge staff.
Sincerely, h
. c. mR 16 John R. Longenec Acting Director,jer 4
Office of Breeder Demonstration Projects Office of Nuclear Energy 3 Enclosures cc: Service List Standard Distribution Licensing Distribution Dool s
I Yb 8212230263 821221 PDR ADOCK 05000537 A
Enciscura 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES RELIABILITY PROGRAM MEETING December 20, 1982 Name Organization A. R. Meller CRBRP-P0/PMC S. Singh Bajwa NRC (DL), NRR Bill Horton SAI - La Jolla Stan Basin SAI - Palo Alto, California Bob Liner SAI - McLean George Clare W-OR Peter Gross CRBRP-P0/ DOE-OR Dan Ujifusa DOE - Germantown Bryce Johnson SAI - McLean/Palo Alto Ed Wittry CRBRP-PO Tom King NRC-CRBRP l
1
RELIABILITY MEETING AGREEMENTS AND COMMITMENTS December 20, 1982 Overall Program Document: The project will provide a document describing the overall program for ensuring reliability of the system. The docu-ment will include the following:
the overall purpose (goal) of the program and a summary description of how the goal is to be achieved; the specific programs which support overall reliability and where they fit in the overall program (i.e., PRA, QA, various testing programs; etc.)
the elements of the organization responsible for reliibility, including item by item responsibility, overall responsibility and lines of authority; a schedule of accomplishment of the elements of the program relative to construction, fuel loading, power operation etc.
The document will allow the reader to determine what the overall program is and to identify the sub-programs and (associated documentation) which contribute to the overall program.
The document will be provided to NRC January 7, 1982.
t
- - = -.. :.:...:.; ::.:..
~-.
f 6
l g
- 's e
4 4
O O
8 i
e i,
h s e,12$~Igsl
's a
=
c g
=ge a
=
hg 8
- gg
[g' g
F-b O
e e
G l
...-4.*..
-s
~ ^ '
'e e
e e
e 9
0 e
s W-ly
~
,r g
M
~
E$-
!=t
$8 5 ts BE E
g gE G
=
g$
g n!!!
- l3 g
ae s
N EE O6 EE E
d E E_g a
3g 4
E Rs E
E E9 5
8 5 gE G
d 5
W5 E
M h
l$$!!$
O e
-,~ '
, g g +~-
- g*
& 4 eAMSaeems w M e&
4 9
e
= - *W
'W-
"O E
g 9
q 6
o t
e l
g IC y
.4
~==
N I B.k g
e_ m I:l::
C y
~$k h$
h BW g
B k
E E
~
Ek
=
a S
E 6
E ih E
E
~
E
- 3
- 1 I
ds i
e e
0 e
~
i u
Eg e
=
B B
5-s:
mi g
a a::
Y G/1 R
E yk h
a e
s
-,E lB
$5 B
E a
w Ee s
h
[b g
a e,
a*
NHe la se i: W 9
3 l E!!
$s$g5
=
5 M
" ~s e, m 5
CE d
l E d E 's. l W 5
5s 2
E u
~
~
W@
e.a $
E 's M
F:
g Ps l'
I 8
9
-.,w.-
Om CREP PRQJ,ECT CURRBIT PalMILITY PRTfW1 OlUECTIVE f
IS MWEST NO RFALISTIC.
"FROVIDE ADDITIONAL ASSURMCE 111AT 11E FROBABILITY OF E IS ACCEPTMLY LGi." (601:. LESS Ilim GE CINCE lii GE MILLION Y!
s
- RELIABILITY BfWE91 BIT
- RELIABILITY VERIFICATIQ1 PROGRRI ACTIVITIES ARE TAILORED TO PRWUCE GREATEST B RELIABIL11Y (SAFETY RNCTI0tD FROGRM IS MRiBITED WITH AVAllA GENERAT10tD FEDGRM O
e 6
h w
=
~
GBRP PRWECT TlE FOCIE OF TIE RELIABILITY PROGRM IS DICTATED BY THE RM DESIGN
- ll!E RFKTOR CORE IS TIE 6tY S0lRCE WIT 11 RITENTIN. TO EXCEED GUIDELINES
~
- LDSS OF CORE C00lABLE GED1ETRY IS iECESSARY PREREWIS RElfASE
- LOSS OF (DRE 000UHf GEUETRY IS GtY RESIHf WITH
- 1) FAILURE TO SGM
- 2) LOSS OF ABILITI TO REMOVE DECAY il FAT
[0TE: ABILITY OF 00NTAlfNENT SYSTBi TO MITIGATE DEEMDED GRE EVEN ODPSIDERED IN THIS RER#ti IS TREATED ELS8HRE'.'
j
l x
l t
p 2
f.G n E
EM R
shd E
g ggd ggi s
,e sm
$w g-sg
[
g g,W n
.M s a
w f
W
's E*
g gM E
g ej E 3l, R Eg5g Ht E
e s
e jm m2 0
am 5
E,g 5 5 fm
>- 5 g
e EeM
$5
$ _$ $e
' E a
g!g_gg@a g-n as s-i s
m z.
e 2eg
=ssB sg m
=e a
B......h..ma s
NN m
m m
N i
i 4
0 O U P R UJELT j
QW.lTATIVE ASSESS 184TS ME PERRRE IN PARA!IEl. WITH UllER DESIGN N,TIVliiFS AT TIE UNFGW #D SYSIB1 LEVELS
~ RELIMILITY RBNED Cuf0NENIS LIST (RRCO SPECIFIES TIE REQJIRED AfW.YSES
- C0f0NENT: RB #Dj IN S01E CASES! CCFA -
- SYST81:' RELIABIll1Y DESIGil SUPRET DOCUM (RDSD), ifCUD-l INi RE #D CCFA AT UNRXM NO SYST91 LEVEL.S
- D00MNIS ME REQJIRED RR DESIGN REVIEWS
/
i CRBRPPRQJECT i
TESTS 00NFifN DESIGtS MEET PERF0lPMCE RBXllRBEiTS,' D006 TATE MRGil6 #D ALL0lf S110Y- 0F litfWl INTERFACES
~
t s
f PLANT PROTECTION SYSTEM 4
~
mlMARY #D SECOIDARY 91TIDOWN SYSTB1S miff S0Dilti Flf1PS/ DRIVES STEN 1 GENERATORS B1 FilTS 51All LIQJID i1ETAL VM.VES 00hTROL IUN MOCK-UP NOTE: BEMSIS IS ON FIRST-0F-NKII0 0(FMBIS
~
w O
E
-_~
t,
.- J 4
CRIRP RGJELT ii QJAilTITATIVE RELIABILITY ASSESSiEhTS PROVIDE-I!
liEIGiff INTO SYSTETVC01P0lGT llRETNICE
'69 RELIABILITY BLOCK DIfGRINS
'.l FAIUff1 REPAIR RATES BASED Oil AVAllABLEIMTA PLUS
~
ENGilE Rife Jt0GB4ENT f
~.
C0(EERVATIVE lillTIATOR ASSlMPfl006
~
liHIT #0 OllIPlff REVIE)ED BY COGiilZnif DESIGERS l
/
L
- ! !i
]
~
~
-AT S
I Y E E
MP T &
V I
A O
L W
E R
I P
B P
0 A U A
W C I
E S L S O
I f
E E V N f
R T N
E I
T a
N S m R H I
S T
R E i N
H E, W H
I V D E
0 R I
P Q
iC 1
0 V
O E O
R E
C R D
R P D R S S E N
s P A C T
, N N D l
E O
O.,
S E
I R
1 H M W
> N NE S
E 1
l I
T F
T 0 I
I f
E N S Q I
0 W R i
R G W T V D l
E R T
I E
s I
l f
S I
l T L R
N 0
E V
C E S
E A V EI l
1 D
E i
1 T
R M E
D S S
T A R
)
L E
S N
MT C
Z O I
F Y,
S E
E S
H S
I J
N C T N
i T
S Q
A S I
E W
R N
N T
A I
R G
E L G E
N I
s RR P
G I
O 0 i
E E
E Y R
S i
V O T P
l P
I B
G S S E S
S I
R 4
S T
B I
, S S
E A
R P B R E I
E 8
S S
T C
G I
G V O S O E (A C T
A S
I R N R L U
$U A
T D
S P S
N P O P
i C
E R S
S M
P P
R R S
R R
Y S L O P
S O Q
l T
E L
T S
A E
9 R
A E
I O
V S
L R S S
E MN E
N I
L E
E E
V N T
V E
I B A V H I
A I
I B
T T T
T V
A i O S Q
I I
A I
I A
E L
I S L T R WIW (A
T R
E T T B N 0 I
?
R A E A 0
L I
U D D
Z S
I D(
s I
T N
E t
Y N
A C
T E
S G
I E
R F
S L
dm R
I i
S E
uS O
F S V
I O E 6 0 B F E R
M O
R A
H S R
J I
T T Q GI t S E
P C
I I
L A
P R
l i
E V T l
E E
S l
I C
R s E i
P N
uT i
R KR ki VI R
R iI s
V E
U R
R T W
G B
e e
o G
j 8
!E g;E t;
e a
=
iDl!
E g
~
y 5
d wa
.m Mis g
5
~ig g
E!s !j
=y 5 a
w a
. w
)!
g.$.E
,E n
g
$8
~
G
~
b~
h.th e=BlB er 3
e g
3 2
m e
6' g
d 5
m
-9s W
e 1
(
. 2 : =...=.==.
t BRIEFING ON CRBRP RELIABILITY PROGRAM SCIENCE APPLICATIONS, INC.
PREPARED BY:
B. JOHNSON W. HORTON S. BASIN R. YODER E. RUMBLE DECEMBER 20, 1982
.EI
=::: - -
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The NRC Staff has determined that a Reliability Program is necessary in order to ensure the continuing high relia,
bility of systems in CRBRP which have a potential impact on public risk.
The purpos.e of this review is to ascertain the adequacy of the applicants' proposed Reliability Program.
0 0
BM
- =...=
...... :. :a CRBRP SYSTEMS REVIEWED The allocation of Reliability Program resources may vary between the categories listed below:
e Operating Systems Support Normal Function of Plant e
Systems Which Respond to Faults in Operating Systems Example:
DHRS Standby e
Systems Which Mitigate Accidents Example:
Containment s
J
.- +..:=..=.-...-
.z...
~
~
PHILOSOPHIES OF RELIABILITY 0WNER VS REGULATOR REGULATOR Must ensure that Reliability Program is adequate f.or protecting public OWNER Must protect public as well as consider the financial impact of operation l
\\
Al
CRBRP CANDIDATE SYSTEMS FOR RELIABILITY REVIEW SELECTION PROCEDURE 1.
Tabulate front-line systems associated with large inventories of radioactive material (potentially can exceed 10CFR100 guidelines).
2.
Select from the list developed in #1 above those front-line systems for which high reliability is required due to their potential impoct on public risk.
1 3.
Identify support systems for front-line systems in 1
- 2 above.
o G
nl
~
~
~
~
~.
SYSTEMS SELECTED FOR REVIEW FRONT LINE SYSTEMS REACTOR INTERNALS 5
CORE RESTRAINT FUEL a
HEAT TRANSPORT VESSEL /PHTS/IHTS 2
SGS RHRS s
ENGINEERING SAFETY SYSTEMS RSS - 1 CONTAINMENT / CONTAINMENT ISOLATION - 3 LINERS / GUARD VESSELS / CATCH PANS - 6 AUXLIARY FRONT-LINE SYSTEMS NEW/ SPENT FUEL - 14
' Numbers are relative order of importance with regard to reliability resource allocation df Af
..-...:...;=x. x...c.-
I SYSTEMS FOR REVIEW (CONTINUED)
RELATIVE SUPPORT SYSTEMS IMPORTaCE*
~
ELECTRIC POWER 2
l ONSITE 7
0FFSITE AUXILIARY SUPPORT SYSTEMS 1
HVAC CHILLED WATER 1
DIESEL AUXILIARY SYSTEMS 2
FIRE PROTECTION 7
RECIRCULATION GAS CCOLING 1
INSTRUMENTATIO'N AND CONTROL FRONT-LINE SYSTEM CONTROL 2
SUPPORT SYSTEM CONTROL 1
PLANT CONTROL 7
MONITORING SYSTEMS 2
HUMAN FACTORS INSPECTION AND TESTING 1
1 MAINTENANCE 1
PROCEDURES 1
MANAGEMENT
- With regard to reliability resource allocation of front line systems df AI
i.... 2. _ _.... l. _. ; ~.
~ -
8 i
MAIN CRITERIA FOR RELIABILITY REVIEW e
Existence of adequate reliability'. documentation o
Existence of an overall reliability measure of the plant.
(Not a design requirement) e Existence of overall reliability program which provides a means of assuring continual plant compatibility with reliability measure, e
Existence of front-line and support system programs Which support the overall program e
Appropriate reliability resource allocation e
Means of feedback and implementation of reliability information e
4 J
... m. 2. :._' __.. _ 'i. : _..
~
CHARACTERISTICS OF RELIABILITY PROGRAM e
A reliability organization with appropriate authority and responsibility e
An appropriate analytical program
~
e An appropriate experimental or test program e
Proper coordination between analytical and test programs e
e Use of standard or accepted techniques and appropriate reliability data
/f e
Appropriate reliability procedures for procurement, construction and operation 1
Af DH
~
- . '-... =.=.- - -s=:::
~
t FRONT-LINE AND SUPPORT SYSTEM RELIABILITY PROGRAMS o
Quantitative measures compatible with the overall measures e
Mechanisms for reliability tradeoff at system and component level e
Appropriate reliability information transfer e
Definition of performance requirements e
Assurance of continuing program continuity e
An auditable reliability program s
t Af
- - - - - - -