ML20070H097
| ML20070H097 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1991 |
| From: | Fay C WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-91-025, CON-NRC-91-25 GL-89-06, GL-89-6, VPNPD-91-086, VPNPD-91-86, NUDOCS 9103130244 | |
| Download: ML20070H097 (3) | |
Text
_
Wisconsin Electnc PONER COMPANY 2M w Memm Po kw m Muuoc w M23 9nw.m VPNPD 066 NRC 02 5 March 5, 1991 Document Control Desk 1
I U.
S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Hall Station P1-137 Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemon:
DQ.QEETE,_50-266 AND 50-301 ADDITIONAL RESPONSE TO NRC GENERIC LETTER 89-21 COMMITTED TASKS POR JULL IMPI&MENTATlQii DJ_ SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTLti We have received your letter dated January 8, 1991, accepting our plan for responding to NRC Generic Letter 89-06.
In that letter it was stated that the SPDS should be fully implemented by March 1991.
Additiona31y ve were asked to inform you if these commitment dates needed to be :: hanged, and also to submit a responso upon completion of.these commitments, at which time the SPDS will be considtred fully implemented.
The information provided with this letter is intended to clarify our ccamitments and report on the progress wo have made to date at completing them.
Our responso to NRC Generic Lettor 89-06 was by letter NRC-09-082 dated July ~12, 1989.
In that letter we committed to a number of actions.
These actions, in the order of their committed completion dates, and their progress are summarized hete 1.
Review all units of measure used in the SPDS to compare J
with control room motors and emergency operating L
procedures (Commitment date of July, 1990).
This task was completed and documented in an internal memorandum dated June 28, 1990.
2.
Implement any changes from the review described above (Commitment date of September 1990).
No changes were required as a result of this review.
L 1
i 9103130244 910305 kDOCK0500Qb a nim,,m;ww,nii n.m,mri y
)
DR.
Document Control Desk March 5, 1991 Page 2 3.
Review of SPDS setpoints for comparison with emergency operating procedures, other control room setpoints, and between different displays (Commitment date of January 1991).
This task was completed and documented in an internal memorandum dated January 30, 1991.
4.
Implement any changes from the review described above (Commitment date of March 1991).
Our review in this matter also concluded that no changes were required.
5.
Document the basis for the SPDS setpoints (Commitment date of March 1991).
This task is not complete at this time, but is expected to be completed in March 1991.
6.
Review all parameter labels and abbreviations used in the SPDS and ensure that they comply with the post-Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) control room indications and the standard usage manual (Commitment date of July 1991).
This task is not complete at this time, but is expected to be completed in July 1991.
We concluded our July 12, 1989 letter with the statement that upon completion of these actions we certify that our SPDS will fully satisfy the requirements of NUREG-0737, Supplement 1, taking into account the information in NUREG-1342.
We would like to point out that the statement in your January 8, 1991, letter expecting full implementation of the SPDS by March 1991 is not consistent with the commitment dates we submitted in our July 12, 1989, letter as noted above.
Since all of these tasks must be complete for full implementation and task six described above had a completion date of July 1991, the correct expected SPDS implementation date should have been listed as July 31, 1991.
This final task above is to compare parameter labels and nomenclature used in the SPDS with those used on control room meters, labels, annunciators, procedures and the Standard Usage Manual.
We had committed to complete this task by July 1991 and still expect to meet this commitment.
We inadvertently neglected, l
e e
D'ocument Control Desk March 5, 1991 Page 3.
however, to provide an estimated completion date for incorporating any changes resulting from this review, as we had done for the other review tasks.
We commit to have any changes resulting from the task six comparison incorporated by December 1991.
We believe that any present inconsistencies in nomenclature between the SPDS and these other reference sources does not significantly impact its use and that-the system now meets the intent of the NUREG-0737, supplement 1, requirements.
As requested in your January 8, 1991, we will notify the NRC when these commitments are complete.
Should you have any questions concerning this-letter, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours, h
[Ad A -
C.
W.
Fay Vice President h'uclear Power Copics to NRC' Regional Administrator, ReElon III NRC Resident Inspector s
we e
---nv---
. ---1
. -