ML20070E603
| ML20070E603 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1982 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TVA-SQN-TS-33R1, NUDOCS 8212170318 | |
| Download: ML20070E603 (2) | |
Text
,
e, e~
=
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOGA, TENNE'SSEE 374ol 400 Chestnut Street Tower II December 13, 1982 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Ms. E. Adensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ms. Adensas:
In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority
)
50-328 As requested by Melanie Miller of your staff, enclosed is the additional l
information regarding the ice condenser door surveillance inspection results. This information is being submitted to supplement information provided by my previous submittals to H. R. Denton dated July 29 and August 12, 1982 (TVA-SQN-TS-33R1).
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch I
with J. E. Wills at FTS 858-2683 Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY-L.MIMils, Manager Nuclear Licensing Sworn d subscr bed before me thi%
day of 1982 a
Notar Public
~
i My Commission Expires
/
/
Enclosure i
cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission Region II Attn:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator
}O 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 l
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 f
i G
An Equ9 Opportunity Employer
- -,, - - - -...., - ~ ~ -, - - _,,.. -
b f -
o ENCLOSURE SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT ICE CONDENSER DOOR SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION RESULTS Based on our review of the data provided, the parformance history is summarized as follows:
1.
The unit 1 inlet doors were tested ten times beginning on May 1,1979 The unit 2 inlet doors have been tested three times.
2.
One test failure occurred on October 24, 1979 when the left door on bay 19 failed the test by one inch-pound (675 required). This failure occurred prior to receipt of the operating license. No other failures have occurred.
3 In May 1980 a bad seal and spring were replaced on a door although it passed the test without this maintenance being performed.
4.
In February 1981 a missing door spring was replaced although the door passed the test before the maintenance was performed.
5.
In June 1981 ice was removed from the reactor side of five doors (no ice near the seals) although the doors passed the test before the maintenance was performed.
6.
No other inlet door maintenance has been needed.
4 e
9 0
e
-