ML20070D763
| ML20070D763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/1991 |
| From: | Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9103010156 | |
| Download: ML20070D763 (5) | |
Text
--
D A LT IMORE OAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER e P.O. BOX 14/5 e DALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 Ltcav0jtlssttt Pebruary 22, 1991
.m. u.,...... n... m.. n. w US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Document Control Desk
Subject:
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50 317 and 50 318 Performance Improvement Program Update Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find a brief synopsis of our most recent Performance Improve-cent Program (PIP) activities. You may recall that this Program was integrat-ed with our Nuclear Program Tian (NPP) in January of this year.
This inst.tu-tionalized the performance 'mprovement process and established line organiza-tional responsibility for rerformance improvement administration and implemen-tation.
Also enclosed is a status update of our NPP Performance improvement Initia-tivos.
These are categorized as Business Process or Cultural (division wide) initiatives.
They include the remaining PIP Action Plans plus several new initiatives added as a result of our Summer Planning Conference.
Please contact me (301) 260 6680 or Mike Markowski, our Nuclear Program Plan administrator (301) 260 4479, should you have any questions.
Very Truly Yours, f'
k(UAM /
l Attachments cc:
Mr. J.T. Wiggins (NRC)
Mr. D.G. Mcdonald, Jr. (NRC)
Mr. L.E. Nicholson (NRC) i 910?O10156 910222 F'OR ADOCK 05000317 r
P PliR
l j
rebruary 22, '991 i
Page two bec: w/ Attachmo,ts G.C. Creel l
C ll. Cruse R.E. Denton G.L. Detter D.V. Graf R.P. Heibel J.R.
Lemons i
R.F. Lewis M.T.-Markowski M.J. Hiernicki B.S. Montgomery R.C.L. Olson P.A. Pieringer J.A. Tlernan b
4 s
I a
s i
2 I
d h
l u..
.-..u.
2
]-
1
<06> ACTION PLANS ON THE PIRP AGENDA POR CLOSURE 2.2 01/91 Communications Plan M Moody l
2.3 02/91 NPP Issues Based Planning H Markowski 3.9 12/90 Quality Circles Program S Elkins l
4.2 02/91 QV Improvements K Romney 4.7 12/90 POSRC J Carroll 5.2.2 02/91 Surveillance Test Program C Dunkerly 2
dates = completion of verification activities
<12> CLOSED ACTION PIANS (PIP rev 5: Appendix D) i 2.5.3 11/23 Performance Objective Improvements M Markowski
~
3.3 11/23 Leadership Conferences M Matkowski 4.8 11/23 Off Site Safety Review Committee M Miernicki 4.9 11/23 Visiting Other Plants G Campo j
$.1-11/23 Auxiliary Systems Engineer Unit L Tucker 2.5.1 11/23 Commitment Tracking System M Markowski 3.8 11/23 System circles S Davis 5.2.3 11/23 Post Maintenance Testing J llayden 5.4.1 11/23 Sys*em Engineer Training J Yoo 3.2 11/23 Managing Org and Program Change M Markowski 3.7 11/23 Engineering Planning M Marinari 4.3 11/23 QA Internal Assessmet.t Improvements A Anuj o dates - FIRP nuesting & closure date
<48) TOTAL PERPORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES t
NOTES
-Nuclear Program Plan Initiatives are des.ignated by NPP prefixes.
PIP Action Plans are represented by numerical prefixes.
PIP Action Plans modified as a result of NPP initiatives have mixed NPP and numerical prefixes.
Sponsor Managers are identified by initials preceeding the project manager for NPP " cultural" initiatives.
-Blanks in the date column indicate that these have not been set at the time of publication.
SY!;0PSIS OF RECENT PERPORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ACTIV! TIES i
21Feb91 Twelve Action Plans were reviewed and closed by our Performance i mp r ov e tte n t Review Panel (PIRP) in Novettbe r.
The panel consists of the Vice President Nu-clear and his Managers.
Their charge is to evaluate verified Action Plans againsc their root. causes and menagement expectations Pollowup actions were assigned to 6 and investigations addressing the need for further imp rovettent s were initiated for 3.
Management responses to the findings of the 2nd Effectiveness Verification were received in Decembet.
Analysis of these, including followup of the 1st vertical slice recommendations was initiated in January.
PIP transition to Nuclear Program Plan wns irrplement ed in J anuary.
Management Supervisor) is now responsible for the coordi-Sy s t e ro s
'it (Mike Markowski nation of performance i rrp roveme nt efforts.
Other significant changes associ.
ated with this tree tion include implerren* '
i,eessment/ Performance litp roveme nt Cycle
-refocus..g ecountabitity for performance ittp roveme nt from the PIP project team to the line organization.
-converting PIP P/2 schedules into Action Item Trachite due dates and mile-stones
-adding 8 new performance improvement initiatives and modifying 4 P!P Action Plans in response to Summer Planning Conference recommendations The concept of business process was adapted as a cornerstone of future Nuclear Program Plan performance improvement rfforts.
A business process represents a discrete operation or activity that ran be ditected by an " owner", produces a
" product" for " customers", and has na output goal (performance standard) and a means of measuring achievement against that goal (performance indicators).
The BG6E procedure hierarchy establishes a framework supporting business proc-ess definition.
Future perform 1nce improvement s will be categorized into oi-ther business process upgrades or cultural (nuclear divisional) upgrades.
A pilot program to establish 8 business processes, owners, and performance indi-cators was initiated in January.
Definition of the remaining buniness proc, esses is expected to follow during 1991.
The NRC Site Residcnt inspector was briefed on c,ur recent performance improve ment activities in January.
Two Action Plans were traced through the verifi-cation and closure path by the NRC Site Resident inspector.
The results will be presented in an inspect ton report.
NUCLEAR PROGRAM PIAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITI ATIVES 2.U1h11 Status Update
<16> ACTIVE PROCESS tjPOP,ADES 2.5.2 01/93 Regulatory Com.nitment Mgmt Process B Mann 3.6.3 04/93 Operations Improvement Plan J Thorp 4.4 04/91 Independent Safety Evaluation Unit P Pieringer 4.5 04/91 Safety Assessment B Waskey 5.3.2 06/91 ETD/MPS R Brown 5.3.3 02/91 Technical Manual Ittprovement s T Roy 5.3.6 11/91 Information Resources Mgmt Project A Barth 5.3.7 01/93 Drawing Improvement Program
- 1. Tucker 5,4.2 08/91 M Nor Modifications B llolston 5.4.3 12/91 L inbility Centered Maintenance R Greene NPP
/91 Unauthori: ed Drawings in Shops M Bowman NPP
/91 QC Role /MIP/ basis of proc values D Heibol NPP
/91 Rising O&M Costs M Markowski NPP
/91 Turnover, People Attrition L Miller NPP
/91 E0Ps for Below Power Modes R Wenderlich NPP
/91 System Obsolescence / Life Cycle Mgmt C Cruse dates - target completion dates
<0B> ACTIVE CULTURE UPCRADES 3.4 07/91 Teamwork 6 Interfaces JRL/M Markowski 4.1 06/92 Operating Experience Review LBR/P Pieringer 5.2,1 12/92 Procedures Upgrade Program RED /T Pritchett NPP361 10/91 Site Integrated Scheduling DVG/J Doswell NPP410 01/92 Issues Management System DVG/J Doswell NPP
/9 Administrative Duties vs Leadership JRL/M Markowski NPP
/9 Vertical 6 Horizontal Communications JRL/M Markowski NPP534 01/98 Config Mgmt/DB Consolidation CHC/P Perks dates - target completion dates
<06> 6.CTION Pl ANS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION CYCLE (veri fient ion or rework) 2.1 09/90 Performance Standards M Markowski 3.5 10/90 Project Management Improvements E Zumwalt 3.6.2 01/91 Maintenance Work Control J Hayden 4.6 11/91 Root cause Analysis Improvement S Davis 5.3.5 11/90 Records Management / Document Control A Vogel NPP531 02/91 Procurement R Cellars dates - initiation of verification activities
_