ML20069M799

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 791207 Meeting Re Basic Concepts for Startup & Test Program
ML20069M799
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/1979
From: Troffer G
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To: Ballard B, J. J. Barton, Broughton T
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8212010300
Download: ML20069M799 (5)


Text

l >

9A.' . . f;yE4 ..

/ p ,.r q METROPOI.lTAN EDISON CO M P A N Y sos,io;.,y or c. .,.i resi;c uiiiiii., co,po,.iion Subject MINUTES OF STARTUP AND TEST PROGRAM MEETING Location TMI HELD DECEMBER 7, 1979 Date December 10, 1979 To B. BALLARD N. C. KAZANAS J. J. BARTON G. P. MILLER T. G. BROUGHTON D. G. MITCHELL J. J. COLITZ I. D. PORTER J. T. FAULKNER M. J. ROSS +

J. F. FRITZEN D. M. SHOVLIN T. M. HAWKINS E. G. WALLACE J. G. HERBEIN P. S. WALSH 1 S. KARKARLA The purpose of the meeting was to review the basic concepts for the Startup and Test Program for the 1%it I restart.

G. P. Miller pointed out that significant engineering help would be required from engineering tp develop the procedures for the test program. H.e pointed out that many of the pro-cedures to be developed are without precedent at TMI. It was agreed that we will have a test working group (TWG) and must develop the interface between the TWG and PORC.

Admin. Program The Unit 1 Restart Program will be patterned after the Unit 2 construction startup and test program. SP-1047 will be used to establish policies and assign responsibilities. AP-1047 will list personnel and establish organizational relationship. It will provide a lir? Of items for TWG control, an MTX, and an index and scope ~~0e apt instruction (TI'S). AP-1047 is being written by the rar no and test group to be signed by R. L. 4 Williams a J T coffer and be reviewed and signed by QA. '

The PORC re, ,a ..,,irements will be satisfied by the signature of the TWG/FDRC reprebentative.

AP-1043 will provide the procedures and a flow chart for ECM's through the review and approval after being received by TMI. .It will pro-vide for field questionnaire (FQ) resolution on engineering design problems. AP-1043 will provide for resolution from either onsite or offsite. A forthcoming revision will termit supplements to specific revisions of the ECM's to become a permanent part of the ECM. It was agreed that the responsible (cognizant) engineer and D. G. Slear must sign and approve any changes to ECMs. PORC will review and sign ECM's as specified in AP-1043. The Quality Assurance review and 8212010300 791210 i PDR ADOCK 05000289 '

INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM P PDR

_f.

4

./ ;*. ~ /. . .

.3 iri?,

?

. p . p. -

[-

. n, - ,'

.4 *

'M

./ y signature will be acceptable from either Mountain Lakes or TMI

'rganizations. QA will review ECMs and ECM changes before

-\ WANs are issued, dd*'

[+f Action

.'O(~

l. B. Ballard and J. T. Faulkner to jointly set-up arrangements-

'for QA review.

Pt f; - 2. J. T. Faulkner and Tom Hawkins to meet with R. W. Dubiel and W. E. Potts to determine ALARA requirements.

.\

s Ar-Built Drawings ise problems with our current as-built drawings and a lack of a program to update drawings to reflect the new change mods were discussed.

Action

1. J. T. Faulkner to complete the development of a formal as-built drawing procedure. J. T. Faulkner to conduct a formal meeting to develop an in process control program for as-built drawings with representation as follows:

Architect Engineer i Generation Group Technical Support l , Quality Assurance

-/ THI Document Control (Weiser)

TMI Engineering Support Group l Startup and Test

> ~

Unit 1 Superintendent i Onsite Manager Unit 1 Restart l/ ' QA Interface

' N. C. Kazanas stated that after the revision 8 to the OQA Plan is

.f published in mid-January 1980 there will no longer be a need for

~ the separate QA plan for restart mods to TMI Unit 1.

l

! N. C Kazanas pointed out that the new Reg 1.33, Rev. 2, Appendix A l

will require an expansion of the QA scope to cover certain areas in the secondary plant that are important to safety. He pointed out that it will be necessary to classify systems and component that are im-portant to nuclear sar'ety.and that the single modeof failure analysis l

is no, longer acceptable. It was pointed out that the schedule of the l expansion is critical with rer,,ect to the impact on the startup and test program. It was agreed that Startup and Test will proceed on i

v 4

?

'i l course previously assigned until program changes are issued for this. J. J. Barton pointed out that he does not believe this _ .

will affect startup and test program, but only that which QA surveils'and therefore perhaps leads-to retest:and rework.

Action D

  • 4
1. System Engineering Group to provide D. K. Croneberger with guidelines to implement NuReg 1.33.
2. T. . M. Hawkins and I. D. Porter to meet with Blaine 'Ballard .

to develop the working relationship between1TWC and QA and provisions for active QA participation in TWG.

Various gradations of QA application were agreed upon'in principle.

For example, it was agreed that Quality Assurance will apply to installation and then startup and test, but that the hardware can be commercial grade. This will be accomplished by checking the block on the ECM and WAN for "QA and installation, non-QA for proc ur emen t'.' .

Action

1. J. F. Fritzen to convey the above point to D. G. Slear and initiate action so that ECMs can reflect several gradations of QA application.
2. J. F. Fritzen to initiate engineering review of each mod accomplished so far to determine whether to accept as is or direct new efforts to upgrade with respect to QA coverage.

B&W Participation in Chg/ Mod and Test Program Action

1. T. M. Hawkins to work with F. Faist to initiate B&W task for B&W participation in TWG activities of reviewing and approving test documents. The task will be phrased to insure that signa-ture by the B&W TWG representative will constitute B&W concurrence.

l 2. J. F. Fritzen to pursue the matter of B&W participation in

review and concurrence with ECM's aircady issued and those under l development.

l l

l l

,-~,_--.-___._.-_.,..,..,_,,__..r, -

. u A

+

.e PORC Review Scope Action N. C. Kazanas to assist J. R.* Thorpe _in approaching NRC to' change Tech Specs to reflect only the PORC review' requirements's -

of NuReg 1.33 and ANSI 18.7.

Testing Scope It was agreed that although it is not necessary to rerun all of the construction startup and test it may well be desirable to rerun certain of the ES features tests. Surveillance procedures will provide coverage for much of the entire plant test program and duplication is not desired. I. D. Porter pointed out that wire to wire checks on some cabinets may be desirable. It was decided that when a modification is installed, functions of the system other than just those affected by the Chg/ Mod will be checked, as directed by TWG.

Action

1. Startup and test to look at ES features and recommend what testing will be required.
2. TWG review the old MTX and see what tests should be rerun.
3. Startup and test to develop target list for TWG to approve.
4. Startup and test to review those mods that could lead to increased number of reactor trips and develop list of new tests to_be run and old tests to be rerun to explore this problem.

Power Escalation Test Program Action

1. Startup and test to take first cut at developing test require-ments. This will include a review of refueling history power escalation testing, ICS tuning requirements, runback testing, ES feature testing and main feed pump trip testing requirements.
2. J. T. Faulkner to determine schedule impact of power escalation test program and reflect in schedule.
3. G. P. Miller to obtain B&W (F. Faist) assistance to help develop power escalation test program that will reflect the long shut down of machinery problems.

O.

-e .

~5-Test Auditor It was agreed that the function is desirable, but that a different title will be required. Gary Broughton agreed to arrange for the manpower to review the test documents vs all restart commitments.

J: s 4

I G. J Troffer Ext. 8005

dkf cc: R. Cutler D. Croneberger R. Williams D. Slear J. Thorpe R. Rogers (GAI)

F. Faist (B&W)

D. Havercamp (NRC)

_ _ . .