ML20069M520

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Documents Presented to NRC Witnesses Bellups & Kornegay During 830422 cross-examination
ML20069M520
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/1983
From: Farrelly T
CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC.
To: Doris Lewis
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8305030531
Download: ML20069M520 (24)
v • d • e


Text

e Law Department Consolidated Edison Company of New York,Inc.

i 4 trying Place, New York, N.Y.10003 "hKIJD April 28, 1983

'm ,

David Lewis, Esq.

Law Clerk to Atomic Safety and Licensing Board United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc.,

et al (Docket Nos. 50-247-SP, 50-286-SP)

Dear Mr. Lewis:

Enclosed are the following documents which were shown to NRC Staff Witnesses Bellups and Kornegay during their cross-examination on April 22, 1983.

1. Page B-101 of the " Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operatin of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant Unit No. 3", together with the cover sheet to this document (see Tr. 14308-09).

2.

~

The cover' sheet and page 2 to the Addendum to the Environmental Statement related to the Operation of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 (see Tr.

14309-10).

3. Page V-152 of the " Final Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant Unit No. 3" together with the cover sheet to the document (see Tr. 14310-12)
4. The cover sheet and page VII-51 to "Entrainment Impact Estimates for Six Fish Populations Inhabiting the Hudson River Estuary" Joint Testimony of John Boreman, et al., May 1979 (see Tr. 14313-15).
5. A May 1, 1982 letter, with attachments, from John D.

O'Toole to Ronald C. Haynes (see Tr. 14316-17).

6. The cover sheet and Table 4-11 f rom the Indian Point Generating Station Entrainment Survival and Related Studies, 1980 Annual Report (see Tr. 14317-18 and 14320).

8305030531 830428 PDR ADOCK 05000247 O PDR N,'

0

7. A New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Certificate for Ravenswood 3 (see Tr. -

14324-25).

8. A New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Certificate for Astoria 4 (see Tr. 14325).
9. A New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Certificate for Astoria 5 (see Tr. 14325-26).

Ve trul ur

/Thoma

. Farrell TJF/evr Attachments cc: All parties

? '

. ,j .

NUREG-75/003 a ,

, b 6)kud ^'* ' Y r.. --. , - - _ -- -

-_c ,,-. - - - - , r. r ll_Il-'1(3-11

~

C4 'l -- \_/ . _ ' L3 - _ _ l_' d_ I _

f L pas- .f6 .me .s y ps- pae n 'pm . Y.

l. T ) _

l s,--.-.. .-

l 3 related to operation of .

4 3 IND]AN P-0]NT

] NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT I UNIT NO. 3 CONSOUDATED ED1 SON COMPANY OF NEW YORK , INC.

DOCKET NO. 50 286 i l

! i

, j February 1975 i

j volume ll 1

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION h

  • ~.4.N, =y

..s, e ~ . . c , , ,,w ,,~. y ...s

4

? .

I B-101 used in the applications of the staf f's model are presented in Table B-28.

ll f Table 3-28. Int 2ke avoidance factor and optimum plant survival percentage 9

values employed in the staff's model Ilfe stage Intake avoidance factor Optimum plant survival percentage Egg 0.00 0.20

} Yolk sac ~ larva 0.00 0.20 3 Post yolk-sac larva 0.00 0.20 Juvenile I 0.20 0.00 Juvenile II 0.80 0.00

_ Juventle III 1.00 0.00 (iii) Plant Survival Conditions The reductions in the age group population densities, as they pass through the power plant system, are based on the plant percentage survival factors for the life stages. This factor represents the

- mean survival probability of a striped bass young-of-the-year life stage (based on physiological capabilities) af ter it is exposed to representative levels of mechanical and thermal stresses that generally occur in passing through the plant. The differences in the overall plant percentage survivals for different plants are readily considered in the general formulation of the model by assigning appropriate values to the intake and discharge geometric factors that incorporate the special design characteristics of the particular plants.

Because the plant survival percentage depends both on mechanical and thermal stresses, it is considered in two parts, as the optimum plant survival percentage without the thermal effects and a multi-plicative factor to modify the optimum value for the cases with the thermal effects.

The optimum plant survival percentage values employed in the staff's model are presented in Table B-28. These represent the best esti-mate values for the optimum surrival percentages for the striped bass young-of-the-year life stages based on the discussion given in Chapter V. -

M

-H " r .np _ w . .g g 6:,*.+x-- q g :;- g y a., y p , . c .. ge,., ; 3.., a r wr-c;-;;s e ,-

I(

1 m

1 d Environmental Statement

.Q related to operation of

} INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR CENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 3

i Consolidated Edison Co=pany of New York, Inc.

Q Docket No. 50-286 Yt Volume II, February 1975

.m-N "2 ADDENDUM

  • b h In Appendix B the results given for the Striped Bass Young-of-the-

.e -

Year Model (Section 4.b) and for the Striped Bass Life-cycle ig.f Population Model (Section 4.c) are intended as illustrative examples M only. The results used in ene staff's assessment are given in j Chapters V and XI.

a

II The various parameters given in Appendix B correspond to the re-

-j sults given in Appendix B. The parameters used to obtain the

'jj results in Chapters V and XI are given in the Tables in this Ad-

.i dendum. Only those Tables in which the parameters are dif ferent

) are included; parameters in other Tables are the same. An addi-J tional Table is attached which gives the values used to obtain the q results in Chapters V and XI which differ from the corresponding

} values in the text and Figures in Appendix B.

.H.

?

.y -

3 A

r

'a U

p l

l 1

1 I

j W m.' v v m .g y p w- ,

f

,. - - .1 4,+_.

.- - ,pfy g g c 7 __ _ _

. b

.i 2

d s 6

Table B.24. Parameter values employed in the staffs model for population density dependent compensatory mechanism for survnal percentages of Isfe stage populations Maxunum population Effective Critical population Optimum

^,;

Life stage denuty survival density survival (number per 1.000 ft3 ) percentage (number per 1.000 fts ) p,,,,,,,,,

':\

i< Egg No population density dependent compensatory effect 36.0 g

f Yolk 4ac larva Post yolk. sac larva 7.08 5.56 40 64 0.354 0.278 58.0 74.8 Ty Juvenile i 1.84 90 0.092 93.0 W Juvenre II 1.13 90 0.057 93.0

?.h Juverule 111 0.45 95 0.022 96.5

. Q1 lk -

ii Table B.26. Approumate data employed in the staffs model i for the mobility characteristics of life stage age group populations

  • 2 Crowdmg d Maximum swunming Sustained Intake Shoahng Life stage speed duration avoidance effect eflect 4 parameter

] (fps) (hour) parameter pasameter

-3 Juvenile 1 0.50 2.00 0.00 0.4 0.2 4 Juvendeil 1.00 4.00 0.80 0.4 0.2 g Juvende !!! 1.00 6.00 1.00 0.4 0.2 5

5 1

'l i

Table B-23. Intake avoidance factor and optimum plant sumval percentage values employed in the staffs model

$ Life stage Intake avoidance factor Opamum plant sumval percentage 1

-) 0.20

..J Egg 0.00 Yolk-sac larva 0.00 0.39 Post yolk-sac larva 0.00 0.39 JuvendeI 0.00 0.28 Juvendeil 0.80 0.00 n

1 Juvende III 1.00 0.00 i

i i

4

.i

~

-x c = w w . g - m .e g ,,. - m n , & .. m m y n . y . e n a g. r

i a NUREG-75/CO2 ,

i

8 A) p!AC.~3 6)i.ul  :

s e _. _.. . . . - _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ , _

.-- ., n ., , e r. , O

- @ _1_\[c-,_',Q _ Q 1111 @ _1.Ud_l

/. n. . s.

$r.dUhLl1@l,lU U

.n

.. ,._ .- - . ._. ~ . ,

~. .. . - _ - .

related to operation of

,r-INDIAN PO]NT NUCLEAR GENERAT]NG PLANT UNIT NO. 3 CONSOL] DATED ED] SON CONIPANY OF NEW YORK , INC.

DOCKET NO. 50-286 i Feb rua ry .1975

!, Volume I i

~

,e UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION m

.w)i,r ) .

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION E g e

\

'*.- w. ,

. s.--g gg .; .,

x.-.,._._.- ...

4 _.

N.

' .gl .}i V-152 h

  • e f,

quantitatiw properties of the forecasts. The staff offers no

[ apology for not presenting a c: ore quantitative assessment, which d has a lower level of uncertainty, of the potential impact ofOur j

I, , , d- Indian Point on the Hudson River striped bass population.

U  ! ( fr " l y! of efforts reflect the state of the science and the state-of-the-art forecasting the effects of environmental impacts on a large

', t '

Cfish population, inhabiting an open system, that is the subject of an intense sport and commercial fishery. The staff hastens

l F to add that these comments are equally valid for the applicant's f modeling efforts.

R  :

?  ;

The staff emphasizes that its striped bass life-cycle model is a E single-species population model, which appears to simulate thein

$, However, behavior of the population in a reasonable manner.

}g f reality, the Hudson River spawned striped bass population is one j ' component of a complicated fish com= unity that inhabitsThus, an theeven dy-3 more complicated estuarine and marine ecosystem.

( namics af the striped bass population undoubtedly depend, to k some extent, on interactions between striped bassIn and other addition, j /

biotic and abiotic components of the ecosystem.

E ,

since striped bass are the subject of an intense sport and com-

} mercial fishery, and since fishing mortality is of importance in

,' regulating the population, the dynamics of the Hudson River striped j bass population also depend on social and economic factors that

.g affect fishing effort. Neither the staff's nor the applicant's 4 life-cycle model includes interactions between the striped bass 3 and other biotic and abiotic components of the ecosystem or the y social and economic factors that may influence fishing effort.

,1 The justification for the more limited approach adopted is that

) data on these interactions and social and economic factors are j

e lacking, and even if they were available, an understanding of the cause-eff ect relationships necessary to include such phenomena Y

i in a model is not adequate. The hope is that by focusing on the population per se_, where there are adequate data on fecundities f and survivals, the staff's life-cycle model will be sufficiently J. realistic to a first approximation to serve as part of the basis 3 for making a rational management decision concerning the unaccept-i ability of once-through cooling at Indian Point Unit No. 3 (base 6

design or Alternative A) and the timing of installation of closed-f cycle cooling at Unit No. 3.

7 i

The staff's life-cycle model has certain properties which must be

) ,

kept in mind when interpreting the results but which the staff feels are justified given the present state-of-the-art of fore-casting the long-term effects of environmental impacts on a fish A natural steady state has population such as the striped be ,s.

g been assumed such that following the removal of a perturbation to i .

1 4

6t 3 ., -

~

j.. g -

, ggpm - n.9 ==W mw.m:. , .;.g - + +: i;na.;.-4.;=- .-

. . Garreefed n/. ia/79 p a r. is/x/79(MG)N (X- 2 o o geg/acem en-/ Pages V// / - /6// 7// F J

. . ., ' l

~

,j.r..D ~

Y ENTRAINMENT IMPACT ESTIMATES FOR SIX FISH POPULATIONS INHABITING

~

THE HUDSON RIVER ESTUARY Joint Testimony of John Bore =an, Ph.D.

Lawrence W. Barnthouse, Ph.E Douglas S. Vaughan, Ph.D.2 C.'Phillip Goody. ear, Ph.D.

Sigurd W. Christensen, Ph.D. .

bationalPowerPlantTeam' U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2929 Ply =cuth Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 Environ = ental Sciences Division

! Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 l

PREPARED FOR THE U'.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION II

[

May 1979J l

!.~......

VII-51

~

Table VII-10. Immectate sechanical mortalitiese for four Hudson River plants by population and life-stage with 1 =er and upper estimates representing : one standard error aDout the stadle estimate (calculated from cata tapes proviced by utilities on NovemDer 16, 1977 and April 5,1978)

Bowline Indi an Danskanner Species Lif e-stageb Point Roseton Point Point Lower estimate Striped Sass Y 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33

- P 0.13 0.18 0.16 0.0 J 0.0 0.0

  • 0.0 0.0 White Perch Y 0. 33 0.33 0.33 0.33 P 0.0 0.31 0.58 0.0 J 0.0 0.0 0.0* C,0 Clupeids ' Y 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 P' O.0 0.41 0.12 0.34 J 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Middle estimate
  • Striped Bass Y 0.44 0.44 0.44 Q.44 P 0.17 0.Z3 0.23 0.03 J 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 White Perch Y 0.44 0. 44 0, 44 0.44 P Q.0 0.38 7.73 0.0' J 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Clupeids Y 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 ~

P 0.15 0.44 0.41 0.43 J 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 t::er esti=ste Striped Bass Y 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 P 0. 22 0.29. 3.29 O.25 J 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

. *htta

. Per:n f 0.54 0. 54 0.54 0.54 P 0.0 0.46 0. 99 0.17 J 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 Clunetos Y 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 P 0. 34 0.47 0.71 0.51 J 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 40istnarse ter.ceratare less than 30=C.

by . yoik-sac larvae, P = post jalk-sac lar'vae. J = entrainante

! juvensles.

i

c ;.-

-m.m

, Joha D. O' Toots

-- ** *, Vc Prescent Consoticated Ec' son CcmfMnv of New Yerv **

4 Irving Place. New Yorw NY 10003 Telechone (212) 460 2533 May 1, 1982 Re: Indian Point Unit Nos.1, 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-03, 50-247 and 50-286 Mr. Ronald C. Haynes, Regional Administrator Region I Office of Inspection and Enf orcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

Dear Mr. Haynes:

Transmitted herewith are two (2) copies of the Indian Point Site Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report and the Indian Point Site Annual Environmental Operating Report - Radiological for the period January 1, 1981 to December 31, 1981. These reports are submitted in accordance with Environmental Technical Specification Requirements (ETSR) contained in Appendix B to facility licenses DPR-5, DPR-26 and DPR-64 for Indian Point Unit Nos. 1, 2 & 3, re spec tively. Specifically, these reports satisfy the requirement of Section 5.4.1 of Part I of the ETSR and Section 5.6.1 of Part II of the ETSR.

Should you or your staff have any questions, please contact us.

Very :.ruly yours,

~

I

  1. /kW 14 p - _

ene.

cc: Mr. Richard DeYoung, Director (20 copies)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement c/o Distribution Services Branch, DDC, ADM U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coc: mission Washington, D. C. 20555

l Mr. William C. Mcdonald. Director (2 copies)

Office of Management Informatlan and Program Control c/o Distribution Services Reanch, DDC, ADM U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Leroy W. Sinclair, President Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, N. Y.10019 Mr. Ted Rebelowski, Senior Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocsission Post Office Box 38 -

Buchanan, New York, 10511 Mr. W. H. Baunack, Acting Chief, Indian Point

. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 38 Buchanan, New York 120511 Mr. T. J. Kenny, Resident Inspector Indian Point Unit 3 U. S. Nucle.tr Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 38 Buchanan, New York 10511 O

4

Annual Envirtnmental Prcticticn Plan Reptrt for ths Psrind -

April 24,1981 through December 31, 1981 and the Interim January 1,1981 through April 23, 1981 I Pursuant to Appendix B to Facility Operating Licenses Indian Point Generating Units Numbers 1, 2 and 3 This Annual Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) Report is prepared pursuant to Section 5.4.1 of Appendix B, Part I to The Facility Operating Licenses for Indi-an Point Units 1, 2 and 3 which was issued April 24, 1981.

Section 5.4.1 of the EPP requires that an Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report describing implementation of this EPP for the previous year shall be sub-mitted to the NRC prior to May 1 of each year. This report is for the period April 24, 1981, when the EPP became effective, through December 31, 1981. How-ever, in order to provide continuity, activities conducted between January 1 and April 23, 1981 pursuant to the Environmental Technical Specification Require-ments specified in Appendix B to the Facility Operating Licenses for Indian Point Units 1, 2 and 3, prior to their revision, are addressed.

Section 5.4.1 specifies that the report shall include summaries and analyses of the results of the Environmental Protection activities required by subsection 4.2 of this Environmental Protection Plan for the report period. Since Section 4.2 specifies that no environmental monitoring is required, no summaries or ana-lyses are provided herein.

The following reports on environmental studies were prepared pursuant to former ETSR section 4.1.2.a requirements and were distributed to the New York State De-partment of Environmental Conservation and to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 1981.

Indian Point Generating Station Entrainment and Near Field River Studies 1977 Annual Report (December 1980)

Hudson River Ecological Study In the Area of Indian Point 1979 Annual Report

'f (December 1980) 1978 Year Class Report For The Multiplant Impact Study of The Hudson River Estuary (September 1980) 1979 Bottom Trawl Comparability Study For The Interregional Trawl Survey (January 1981)

The following reports on earlier environmental studies were completed subse-quent to revision of Appendix B, Part I to the Facility Operating License for Indian Point Units I, 2 and 3 (issued April 24 1981) and have been distributed upon request.

1

R:p:rt en 1976 and 1977 D:ta Analyssa and Applicttitn of Life Cycle Modals of tha Hudson River Striped Bass Population (April 1981)

Indian Point Generating Station Entrainment and Nearfield River Studies /f*bly 1979 Annual Report (May 1981)

Indian Point Generating Station jUL-Entrainment Survival and Related Studies 1979 Annual Report (April 1981)

Indian Point Generating Station Entrainment Survival and Related Studies 1980 Annual Report (January 1982) 1979 Year Class Report for the Multiplant Impact Study of the Hudson River Estuary ,

(March 1981)

Section 5.4.1 of the EPP also requires that The Annual Environmental Protection Plan Report shall include:

a. A list of EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them.

There were no EPP non-compliances during the report period at Indian Point Units 1, 2 and 3.

b. A list of all changes in station design or operation, tests, and exper-iments made in accordance with subsection 3.1 which involved a poten-tially significant unreviewed environmental issue.

There were no changes in station design or operation, nor were there tests or experiments which involved potentially significant unreviewed envircnmental issues at Indian Point Units 1, 2 and 3 during the report period.

c. A list of nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2.

There were no non-routine reports submitted for Indian Point Units 1, 2 and 3 pursuant to Subsection 5.4.2.

d. A list of all reports submitted in accordance with the NPDES permit or the State Certification.

Listed below are the reports submitted in accordance with the NPDES per-mit and the State Certification.

o

1. NPDES Permit Listed below are the recipient, transmitter and transmittal dates for the monthly Discharge Monitoring reports for 1981 submitted to the US EPA, and to NYSDEC, pursuant to NPDES permits for Indian Point Units 1 and 2 (Permit No. NY 000 4472), Unit 3 (Permit so. NY 002 7065), and for Units 1, 2 and 3 combined (Permit No. NY 000 4472), as applicabic.

2 i

RECIPIENT TRANSMI2TER TRANSMITTAL DATE Waste Source Monitoring Alan S. Cheifets, PhD. February 22, 1981 Section Chief Chemical Engineer New York State Department Con Edison of Environmental 4 Irving Place Conservation New York, New York 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12201 March 26, 1981 April 29, 1981 May 28, 1981 June 30, 1981 July 30, 1981 August 28, 1981 September 28, 1981 November 4, 1981 December 1, 1981 December 24, 1981 February 5,1982 Listed below are the recipient, transmitter and transmittal dates for Waste Water Treatment Facility non-compliance reports pursuant to the discharge 2,_ permit for the Indian Point generating station.

TRANSMITTAL C0hTD T RECIPIENT TRANSMITIT.R DATE Waste Water Treat- New York State Dept. John C. Brons, 06/29/81 ment Facility Non- of Environmental Con- Resident Manager compliance Report servation, 202 Indian Point 3 Mamaroneck Avenue Nuclear Power White Plains, Plant, Buchanan NY 10601 N.Y.

and U.S. Environmental 12/08/81 Protection Ar ncy Region II 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278 12/11/81 12/28/81 12/30/81 3

Th3 absva ittos of non-compliance resulted from undstermintd problems with the Waste Water Treatment Facility. The Power Authority and its contractor, LMS Engineers, have been evaluating the design and operation of this facili-ty. The Power Authority has corresponded with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the Westchester County Department of Health concerning the performance of this waste water treatment facility. A l schedule for compliance is being developed with the Westchester County De-  !

partment of Health and the Nov York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

4 The Discharge Permit for Indian Point Units 1, 2 and 3 combined, which was issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation effec- j tive May 14, 1981, incorporated by attachment, The Hudson River Cooling Tow- ,

er Settlement Agreement. This Agreement requires at Section 2.D.2 that "any deviations" from agreed upon circulating water pump flow rates at Indian Point Units 2 and 3 be regorted within five days by con Edison and PASNY re-spectively, to the DEC. Such reports shall state the nature and extent of i the deviation and the explanation therefore".

Listed below are the names and addresses of recipients and transmitters as well as dates of , transmittal of circulating water flow deviation reports.

i RECIPIENT TRANSMITTER TRANSMITTAL DATE Mr. Edward Horn, Chief Kenneth L. Marcellus July 2, 1981 Bureau of Environmental Manager, Regulatory Protection Agency Affairs NYS Department of Consolidated Edison i Environmental Conservation 4 Irving Place 50 Wolf Road New York, NY 10003

. Albany, NY 12233 1

Mr. Valter E. Loveridge William L. Kirk July 22, 1981 Bureau of Environmental Director, Biological.

Protection Studies and Evaluation New York State Department of Consolidated Edison Environmental Conservation 4 Irving Place, 50 Wolf Road New York, NY 10003 Albany, NY 12233 Same as above Same as above July 22, 1981

Same as above Same as above July 23, 1981 Same as above Same as above July 27,1981
Same as above Same as above July 28, 1981 Same as above Same as above July 30, 1981 Same as above Same as above July 31, 1981 i Same as above Same as above August 3, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 6, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 7, 1981 Same as above Same as above Ausust 10, 1981 i

Same as above Same as above August 11, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 18, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 21, 1981 4

9 Sama cs abova Stma as abova August 25, 1981 Same as above Same as above September 21, 1981 Same as above Same as above October 2, 1981 Same as above Same as above October 8, 1981 Same as above Same as above October 8, 1981 Same-as above Same as above December 4, 1981 Same as above Same as above December 15, 1981 Mr. Edward Horn John C. Brons August 21, 1981 Bureau of Environmental Resident Manager Protection Power Authority of New York State Department of the State of New Environmental Conservation York, Indian Point 50 Volf Road No. 3, Buchanan Albany, New York 12233 New York, 10511 Same as above Same as above ' August 24, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 26, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 27, 1981 Same as abeva Same as above August 28, 1981 Same as above Same as above September 2, 1981 Same as above Same as above September 4, 1981 Same as above Same as above November 16, 1981 Same as above Same as above Dece=ber 7, 1981 The Settlement Agreement also specifies at Section 2.J that a Biological Monitoring Program be conducted, the elements of which are to be approved annually by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Studies were conducted in accordance with a Memorandum of Agreement with DEC, and reports on the results of studies are in preparation.

The Settlement Agreement specifies at Section 4.I that an Annual Report is to be submitted to the Parties (to the Settlement Agreement) regarding the implementation of Utility obligations under the Settlement Agreement during the preceding year. Listed below are the reports relative to the Indian Point Generating _ Station which were submitted to the Federal and State Agen-cies who are Parties to the Settlement Agreement.

RECIPIENT TRANSMITTER TRANSMITTAL DATE Director, Enforcement Divi- John A. Nutant, Vice October 30, 1981 sion, U.S. Environmental President, Consolidated Protection Agency, Region Edison Ccepany of New II, 26 Federal Plaza York 4 Irving Place New York, New York 10007 New York, New York 10003

, 5

_s

Genaral Counsel, New Yark St to Dspartstnt of Sams as absvo Sama as absys Environmental Conser-vatign, 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 12233 Assistant Attorney General Same as above Same as above in Charge, Environmental Protection Bureau, New York State Department of Law, Two World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Julio Morales-Sanchez, J. Phillip Bayne November 2, 1981 Director, Enforcement Senior Vice Presi-Division, United States dent, Nuclear Generation Environmentd1 Protection Power Authority of the Agency, Region II, State of New York, 26 Federal Plaza, New York 10 Columbus Circle, New New York 10007 York, New York 10019 Richard Persico, General Same as above Same as above Counsel, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Room 608 50 Volf Road, Albany, New York 12233 Paul Shemin, Assistant Same as above Same as above Attorney General in Charge, Environmental Protection Bureau.

New York State Department of Lav, Two World Trade Center, New York, New York

2. State Certification Listed below are the monthly reports for 1981 submitted to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pursuant to the State Water Quality Certification for Indian Point Units Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

RECIPIENT TRANSMITTER TRANSMITTAL DATE Mr. Robert Flacke, Commissioner Donald M Rosh, February 10, 1981 New York State Department of General Manager, Environmental Conservation Technical Support Albany, New York 12201 Indian Point Unit 2.

Con Edison Buchanan, NY 10511 Same as above Same as above March 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above April 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above May 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above ~ June 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above July 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above August 10, 1981

_6

, -m. - . - , _ _ - _ _ . _ _- , . - ,

.~

j[ gf,-.

6 .-

3. . .

I Same as above Same as above September 10, 1981 y7..;$

Same as above Same as above October 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above November 10, 1981 Same as above Same as above December 10, 1981 Mr. Walter Loveridge Same as above January 10, 1982 Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Albany, New York 12201 ,

34 4

e D

4 9

e 7

1 l

[. ,

.fe EA Report C0tt04K2 If 3!

W

.1J hl 14 w

A:

N N'

S 9

i' A

5

.c

  1. i

-c INDIAN POINT GENERATIllG STATION 3 ENTRAltNEllT SURVIVAL AND RELATED STUDIES q

1 1980 ant!UAL REPORT i

-1

+

,k Prepared for

[ Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

4 Irving Place New York, New York 10003 and Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Prepared by Ecological Analysts, Inc.

j R.D. 2, Goshen Turnpike Middletown, New York 10940 January 1982 i

l

l :.h t '

~

t s TABLE 4-11 ENTRAINMENT SdRVIVAL ESTIMATES (S ) eFOR DOMINANT ICilTHYOPLANKTON COLLECTED AT Tile INDIAN POINT GENERATING STATION,1980 f Discharge (b)

Taxa (3) Life Stage Temperature Range (C) "d Se (%)(c) x2(d) p

\ ,

i l

Atlantic tomcod Late PYSL <26 162 87.7(66.2)(0} 3.456 >0.050(f) and JUV T27 25 48.0 (29.2)(e) 17.568 <0.001 triped bass Eggs -

~24-31(9) 147 57.5 54.076 (0.001 YSL <29 21 70.0 14.839 <0.001

~30-32 16 59.0 21.151 <0.001 t PYSL ~<29 31 78.0 14.005 <0.001

) 30-32 16 85.4 4.633 <0.050 ,

i

>33 160 57.8 62.536 <0.001' White perch PYSL 729 49 96.7 0.452 >0.050(f) q 733 117 53.4 52.319 (0.001 lierrings PYSL 729 13 69.2(9) 2.006 >0.050(f)

,j '

Anchovies PYSL 329 24 12.4 8.297 <0.005

>33 556 5.0 165.227 <0.001 (a) Includes all taxa and life stages for which sample sizes were >10 for at least one discharge

$r temperature category.

, p (b) Number collected at the discharge station (Station DP) at the indicated temperature range.

(c) S se were calculated for temperature categories for which sample sizes were _>10, at the intake f (over all temperatures) and discharge stations, except where indicated.

! (d) The null hypothesis (fl I 3 the intake (a = 0.05).o) tested by X is that discharge survival is equal to survival of organisms at (e) Numbers in parentheses represent S (%) based on proportions surviving 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> from collection.

l j This alternative S extended-survival portions hro(%) is forpresent8d because of a significant difference between intake and Atlantic tomcod.

(f) Indicates acceptance of H g , which is that the survival of organisms collected at the disch rge was not

] significantly lower than that of those collected at the intake (a = 0.05). The critical X value is 3.84.

(g) Only nine herring post yolk-sac larvae were collected at the intake station, but because of the importance of this taxa, the S is presented.

Note: YSL = yolk-sac larvae; PYSL = post yolk-sac larvae; JUV = juveniles.

F 7 ' 1

8 N

N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION - DIVISION OF AIR ,

0000 CE02 00003 W C tTION FAC EP CERTIFICATE TO OPERATE AN AIR CONTAMINATION SOURCE ST ATIDHARY Cor180STION INST ALL ATI0H UHIT REHEHAL APPLICATION

, OWHER

) CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY FACIL ITY (6) RAVENSWOOD GENERATING STATION h Oikt. 30 (11) C0nrIoenTIAt STATUS (12) COMPLIANCE STATUS non-COnrIouTo IN COM'LIANCE

) 4 IRVING PLACE (7) 38-54 VERHON BOULEVARD DATE OF LAST CHANGE 05/18/82

) HEW YORK (4) NY (8) QUEENS (9) 11101 (13) PRIOR CO ISSUE DATE 10/01/81

) 10003 (10) REP JOHN A HUTANT VP (14) PRIOR CO EXPIRATION DATE 10/01/82 264'INE.OO g g o.f ,((

( 4110Til-E : SCS.9 KM. 84tlSTACK HEIGHT: 499 FT. (431 EXIT VELOCITY: 29tv90 FT/SEC (44tSIC: 4911 (451 AGFi4CV-CODE-1:

IISSION 512.4 kH. 447)HT ADV STRUC: 299 FT. E481 EXIT FLOH- " ' " "" '"* AC F M (49 BCO FEE: 6 501 AGE ttCV-CCt)E-2 :

$JEI (461UIM-II: EDIT: REV. REQ.

00003 I511GRt:0 ELEV: 14 FT. 4523STK DIAM: 202 Ill. (533 EXIT TEttP: 270 DEGR F (541C0 CO*40ITIONS: 3

. ggo,o . . .. ...... ...... .. . . . ... . . . .. .. ., ...

ISS) HEAT IllPUT: 966M9 MILLIGHS STU/HR E56)COHTINUOUS N0HITORS: (AIOPACITY , , .

.............................................................................................................................. g g g ......................

(591 HEAT INPUT: 9 6 4,40 litLLICitS BTU /HR II,T_.,Q 8 5711 Yl'E: 602 BUILT UP 001LER 4581HfG: COM!iUSTI0tt EttGIt3EERING CC-RR-DTP 4601 AIR It!!AKE: 4 OUTSIDE AIR /H DUCT FAH HEATER 861150URCE CODE: 913Q OIL 1.5 % SULFUR 86210 LOG: BOILER 30 (631FLOop HArtE: SO( L.E E >

i l 1648 TYPE: 052 d1EAM ATONIZED (65)MrG: C0t1BUSTIDH EltGIllEERING HR-T-P - / 1668HO. OF BURNEWi: 64 JRHER DATA "i(Ed 9 M.0' 64766,4.

55"l5000

?99999446 47730 11' ( 69 )t1A)f/HR: (791 TOTAL / YEAR:

JE L D AT A (671 TYPE: 036 HD 6 OIL - VIRGIN FUEL fMANTITTI.}: (683 AVG /HR 3'e 0 (741% OP BY SE450H: 21 26 20 23 (711 FUEL SUPPLIER: VARIOUS (721 HOURS / DAY: 22.0- 8731D)YS/ YEAR:

.................................................................................................................................... (68110: 01 to?IDATE It8S N ZD: 12/65 Cf41ROL (861 TYPE: 009 ELECTRIC l'RECIPITATOR (87)ttFG: RESEARCH COTTRELL IHC ,

(90lDISr GAL NETH00: 02 LANDFILL - 0FFSITE (911USEFUL LITT* 45 IE ARS

";ti!PHLHT y

................................................................'0 ...............................................................................................

E N I S S I O H S  % COHTROL HRLY ACTUAt. ant 3UAt INISS10ti? 11B3H Etpl IR IBS/if00R 4 ACTilAL 10" PE33'ilSSIBLE OHTat11H& HTS C AS la R18t R ACTUAL UH}L Hou DFl _ ITRMISSIBLE i

FFFICIFHCl

.080 (100) 11 (1011 05 (1025 .100 (103) () (104) 694.000 (1053 41.000 1106) 5 (1073 ARTICULATES 8 098 3 14Y 0 75-00-0 (099) 3 ULFUR DIOXIDE (2003 07446-09-5 (109) 1.550 (1101 11 till) 06 (1121 .400 (115) () (1143 13450 (115) 79.000 (116) t1263 6

6 (117) 25.977 8127I t116i HY210-00-0 11198 .230 81203 11 (1213 05 t122) i123I Q 41243, 2000 i1253 12.000 X1 DES OF ll!TROGEH l PECIAL (14SICOH01TIDH 1. SEE ATTACHED **SPECIAL COHOITIOt4S" Ot:".31T10ttS SIPRIOR C0f01EllTS (1638Y (171DATE (18)CURRttar CO' E 5 (191BY E8 (20sDATE 2 / N/O (211 COMPLIANCE

' JTW a* [ (cu//fd w I / /

I . AT @l$ (221DATE OF faEXT ACTION

  • 2. CERTIFICATE TO OPER ATF
3. I233 ISSUE DATE 8O/OI/71 l.
4. (243EXPIRATIOH DATE T / E/85 e.

5-. (253C0 FEE 10 i.

.RH REP'S SIGNATURE: DATE: M [{ ISSUD3G OFFICER'S SIGNATURL: DATEt

- ~ -

Jr4.w.

- Y a

N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION - DIVISION OF AIR s 630000 CE01 41-42 WC LOCATIOtt FAC EP CERTIFICATE TO OPERATE AN AIR CONTAMINATION SOURCE

' STATIONARY COMBUSTION INSTALLATION UNIT <

RENEWAL APPLICATION .

OWHER FACILITY OOs b NO (11) CONFIDENTIAL STATUS NON-CONFIDI (1) CONSOLIDATED EDISON CD (6) ASTORIA GENERATING STATION (12) COMPLIANCE STATUS IN COMPLIAI (2) 4 IRVING PL (7) 20 AVE 3 21 ST DATE OF LAST CHANGE 12/10/31 (3) NEW YORK (4) HY (8) ASTORIA (9) 11105 (13) PRIOR CO ISSUE DATE 10/05/81 (5) 10003 (10) REP: JOHN NUTANT (14) PRIOR CD EXPIRATION DATE 10/01/82 515.5 tosto 1G.oo gg,qq.

f NISSIOL. 4 411ttiti-E : 591.7 rti. 1423 STACK HEIGHT: 297 FT. 1431 EXIT VELOCITY: 1441 SIC: 4911 (451 AGElfCY-Con E-1 :

po :T 1461Ulti-13: ._ rt1. (471HT ABV STRIPC: 127 fe. 14CIEXIT FLOll -'h^ 00 54-et-F T/SFC

^^ ACFil 1493CO FEE: ( 50 lf.GE HCT-000 E-2 :

  • e 'd

( 51 MJ.13D ELEV: 14 FT. 852tSTK DIAH: 169 IH. ( 53 8EX1T TEt1P: 7.V,0 toe 6RF E 541CD C0tIDITIo'IS: 1 I S$1HE AT ItirUT: 3350.0 NILLI0 tis BTU /HR ( 56 300tlTit?JOU3 flOll! TOPS: (AIOPACITY INI T (; 4 5 7 ti r PE: 002 CUILT UP EOILER - e 50 !i1TG: CO 100STION ENGINE ERIT 4G CCRTP (591 HEAT INPUT 3350.00 HILLIONS DTU/HR 8603 AIR IHTAVE: 4 OUTSIDE AIR /H DUCT FAH HEATER (611 SOURCE CODE: 7210 POW!R GEli - SOLID I 62 6 tit DG: 1631Ft00R FLAME:

Est'Rt:E Q D A T A tt43TrFE: 052 SitAtt ATONIZED e 65 mi c: CottDUST10tl ENGINEERit1G HRT-S (66 ft:0. OF BLMNEDS: 32 2,i2 c c F t'i L D AT A t 6 7 3T YrI: 036 to 6 OIL - VIRGIH [yf t_q'Jy1M g: I681 AVG /HR: 650.0 (69 9t14X/HR : 757.0 ( 70 lTOTAL/YE AR : .3 n 5621

( 718 F UE L SUPPLIER

  • 1721 HOURS / DAY: 16.0 ( 73 )D A) S/YE AR : 300 ( 741% OP Of SEA 50H: 02 29 2f (013 f f")L i06ITYPE: 059 1:^hE E 3'J1ritiHT 90.500  %$oo AIR E N 1 S '. I O H S X CO'4 TROL HRLY TUAL At:tFJ A Et1TETOHS (LBS/Y? Ant FFFICIENCY ty hot'R #C 1 10" P; R,'1Mit

_ Cot 4T/ NIHf tJTS CAS t!UMDER ACTUAL tatsi T HOW Ut T gERNISSintf C A

S- 1106) 4 101AL SOLIO PART 10931 HV079-00-0 10993.67he+4 11001 11 11013 g1029 500 (103) (104) 46 (105) -

(1073 160.(

SULTt;R DIOXIDE (108) 07446-09-5 11093 .300 11101 11 (1111 44 1112) .400 (1131 O (114) 1005 (115) 44sMe 11163 5 (117) 64.'

OX1 DES OF tt!IWOGEN (1139 fly 210-00-0 11198 ,l % (120) M 11213 Of t1225 (123) O (1243 *'*-*** c125) 3+,uo 'c le6 ) s 11271 tt . '(o*A poo 21.5c'O 4' 3.700 115) PRIOR COHHEHIS 11610Y (17)DATE (181Ctn:R!flT CottHEHTS (19 tBY N$ (20lDATE ~2 / Mb / (213 COMPLIANCE E 3, 1. /hC M ht( b 8 #dj**tt.U O tdAb h M W (22)DATE OF NEXT ACTION / /

2. 2. fFRTIFTCATE TO OP_' R A,Tj,
3. 3. (2311SSUE DATE 80/ t'//f
4. 4. I243EXPIRAT10H DATE C/ / ff*/ 2
5. 5. 125100 FEE / C)

FIRH REP'S SIGNATURE: D?.TE : g/ ISSUll#G OFFICER'S SIGNATURE: DATE:

{ l f f vaYs[siv.s f!l4.b'?

N.Y.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION - DIVISION OF AIR 630000 CE01 51-52 W C toCATroH FAC EP CERTIFICATE TO OPERATE AN AIR CONTAMINATION SOURCE STATIONARY COMBUSTION INSTALLATION QNIT RENEWAL APPLICATION j

OWHER (1) CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO FACIL ITY (6) ASTORIA GENERATING STATION hoi /fr hh (ID CONFIDENTIAL STATUS (12) COMPLIANCE STATUS NON-CONFIDNT!

(2) 4 IRVING PL IN C011PLIANCI 1

(7) 20 AVE 1 21 ST DATE OF-LAST CHANGE 12/15/81 j (3) NEW YORK (4) NY (8) ASTORIA (9) 11105 '

4 (5) 10003 (13) PRIOR CO ISSUE DATE 12/09/81 (10) REPt JOHN NUTANT (14) PRIOR C0 EXPIRATION DATE 10/01/82 4

ENIS'liott 1419U1N-Es $91.7 KH.

( OM O%.00 3 cA/M.

(42) STACK HEIGHT 299 FT. 4433 EXIT VELOCITY .95-87 FT/SEC (44)SICt PilfLII (46 9Uitt-H2 4911 (451 AGENCY-CODE-18 51-52 (51 st,Rtl3 ELEVE 515.6 KN.

34 FT.

(471HT ADV STRUCt 12 7 F T . (40lEXIT FLollt M ACFM (49)CO FEET $10.00 (503AGEllCV-C00E-28 4 (SinSTK DIAN: 169 III. (53 5 EXIT TEllP 80 DEGR F (54)CO CONDITI0tlSt 1 EDITI REY. REQ.

ISS) HEAT IHPUTI 3350.0 NILLIONS BTU /HR (56)CONTINUOU

......................................................................................S l JAI {_q (57BTYPE8 002 BUILT UP DOILER HONITORS: (AIOPACITY 158 8t1T G t CONDUSTIOff EllGINEERING CCRTP (591 HEAT INPUT

  • 3350.00 HILL 1CHS ETUM!P 8621DtDGt HO. 50 BOILER ROON (601 AIR INTAKEt 4 OUTSIDE AIR /W DUCT FAN ffEATER (611 SOURCE CODEt 7210 POWER GEN - LOLIO (633rt00P HAHEt OPERATING BURNER DATA (64tTYPEt CL2 STEAN ATONIZED 165 )tirG 8 CONDUSTIOtt ENGIllEERING WRT-S i (66tHO. OF BURHERSt 32 FUEL DATA (67tTYPEt 036 ilO 6 OIL - VIRr.It? Turt quAtlTITTE32 (66) AVG /HRt

(.50.0 75;,o t(20000 (711 FUEL SUPFLIER:

-94644.4 1693NAX/HR8 24Pe%4 (70lTOTAL/ YEAR 9M09ett

' 1721 HOURS / DAY (7330AYS/YEARI 300 (743% OP BY SEASON 22 29 25 28 C0!I1ROL t86ITYPEt 099 HOrlE 16.0................................................................

EQUIPitENT

. AIR E N I S S i O N S

!  % CONTROL HRLY ACTUA1. ANNUAL EHISSION*I (LBS/YEARI CONTWINANTS CAS NUMBER ACTUAL i Ut{IC_HOW OET PERLt1SSinLE EFFICItHCY I BSMt0UR ACitfAL 108 PARTICULATES 10983 NYO75-00-0 (099) .027 11001 11 't1011 01 (102) (103) C3 PFPNTSSietL SULFUR CIOXIDE (1089 07446-09-5 (104) 90.500 (1051 39.300 1106) 4 1107) 160.000 (109) .300 11101 11 (1111 06 (1121 .400 (113 O (1141 1005 1115) 43.700 (1163 5 11171 64.320 TOTAL $0 Lits PART (1188 NYO79-00-0 ( 119 ).lM .-999 11203 Pd" (121) ol (122)

(123) Q (124) 633.000 (1255 27.500 l(126) 5 (127)

Il 4

l i

(1510210R C0tittENTS 416 38Y B88 (1730 ATE 12/09/81 (18)CURRt HT C0t1 HEN S fl930Y _E8 _ (2010 ATE 2/N/O (213COMPLIAttCE 5 I

1. SEE ATTACilED SPECIAL ColeITIONS 2.
1. ]'( A0 MPF(Ntk Cgd/[kh4 T (22)DATE Or HEXT ACTION / /

2.

3. CERTIFICATE TD OrrP47{ i:

3.

4. 4.

(2 ptssut DATE IC;

.'yd @ f

. E wlP cI m cart
5. 5.

^

s co ter .f.. l rIRM stP s SIsnArtsEt hp[ 0ATti

/0/ 7Q IS uluo otrICErs s!Ce.Anati m e- ,

2.p om;.~

. c. % e .>

_ . _ . _ - _ .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20069M520&oldid=3545212"