ML20069G467

Procedural Reasons for Acceptance of D Gillman 830228 Five Contentions

ML20069G467
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	03/19/1983
From:	Gillman D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20069G437	List: ML20069G456 ML20069G467
References
NUDOCS 8303250159
Download: ML20069G467 (3)

Text

.

i Procedural Reasons for Acceptance of Doug Gillman's Five Proffered Contentions

"(1) Good cause, if any, for failure to file on time" There was no outstanding alleged and uncorroborated structural alteration existing prior to October 24, 1975 Secondly, '

the en51 neering validity of the Zimmer Power Station - Unit.1 may not have been in question in 1975 whereas 1982 engineering research raises serious questions addressed by Doug G111 man's five contentions and, responsibly, must be raised belatedly.

"(11) The availadlity of other means whereby the petitioner's interest will be protected." ,

At the present time, lack of funds makes a suit for fraud or endangerment impossible. A letter to the Ethics Commision of the State of Ohio mailed March 9,1983 and stating:

"What is the . procedure for some statement by the Commission to be proffered and by what record of the question of whether it is ethical for any spokesperson of the owner's group of the '

Miami Fort Power Station to call the Miami Port Power Station

'a coal fired power plant if the Miami Port Power Station is made from coal fired refined, alloyed and shaped parts but uses nuclear energy to heat steam for the turbine driven dynamos?"

This letter has not been answered as of March 19, 1983. ..

"(111) The extent to which the petitionerb participation may reasonably be expected to assist in developing a sound record." -

For some structural alteration of the Zimmer Power Plant the five proffered contentions strive to show that serious generic and existential defects of the plant are now critical if the -

~ alleged structural alteration of the suppression pool is not addressed properly and will thus serve to create a record that will encompass the desires of all parties for a society 's, of aware consumers as opposed to a society of duped consumers i of which a sound record shall serve aware consumers.

"(iv) The extent to which the petitioner's participation will be represented by existing parties'.'

I At the present time Doug Gillman maintains that the issues he has raised in his five contentions are not being represnted me by any of the parties involved in the Zimmer plant, nor is ggy Doug Gillman himself being represented by any existing parties.

MO 88 "(v) The extent to which the petitioner's participation will mg broaden the icsues or delay the proceeding '

o 05 The proceedin5 accepting the logic of Cestantion2 alone would disblrse all remaining funds slated to the Zimmer plant to Og a set' of solar furnaces and a seasonal industrial expe -

mac viewable in the Zimmer plant.

---.--r.,- . - - - , , - - , , _ . - _ , -- , - - - - , - , - - - - . . .. - - , _ _

$ , '. I-The interest or standing of Doug Gillman in filing his five contentions is many-fold. Any individual capable of engaging any possible mechanisms of discussion or due process regarding some fuel cycle commonly accepted as existing as potentially damaging of the biosphere or humans strengthens the notions of individual responsibility in some governmental settingthe Secondly, byquestion engaging any available mechanisms of due process.

of accepting wanton consumerism or striving towards responsible Thirdly, the consumerism is a question of decisive standing.

mechanisms of accountability by. individuals for any institutions of which the individuals are consumers is such that those mechanisms of accountability by individuals for institutions of their consumption are capable of disintegration without interest or standing by any individuals.

The matter of standing to intervene involves finding a socially acceptable forum to recognize the evolutional structure distribution by the National Grid (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers, Transactions in Power Apparatus and Systems). Within this evolutional structure the power of the entrepreneur engaging commerce and industry to create popular consumer items raises the spectre of encroachments of human habitability by long-lived mutagenic and disease causing This is by-products an thereby decreasing the area of habitable earth.

injury which Doug Gillman allows will irreparably damageIn addition, the quality of his life.

to safeEuard the fus1 cycle of the Zimmer plant have damaged Doug G111 man's phycical and mental health and will continue to unless checked. -

' The matter of standing to intervene with is respect t$oby addressed annoting interest- .

' arguably within the zone of interest'that any usurpation o right of individuals to be free of search or seizure or displacement by some 12ny Corps of Engineers in restructuring .

the bed of the Ohio River so as to achieve displace without any Public Document Room raises thespectre of a s precedental mechanism which if unaddressed and unchecked create a society in which all persons could be potentially displaced and especially challenges the notion of individual freedoms which Doug Gillman claims under this government and by those statutes which Doug Gillman exercises in the proffe of his five contentions.

claims that his inotion is timely Doug Gillman, the movant,becauce the obsolescence The motion is demonstra his contentions directed did not safety to a significant exist until 1982.

or environmental issue because the allegations regarding structural alterations t is ft structure <

and the obsolescence of the design of the Zim i Y ._

o Doug Gillman, the covant, maintains that a different result would have been reached initially if the,se five contentions and these legal issues been considered .in weighing the notion of industrial self-sufficiency on a seasonal basis.

Finally, these issues could not have been raised earlier because Doug Gillman was awaiting confination of reports of alleged structural alterations to the supression pool of the Zitmer plant which did not materialize in the inspector reports;- Doug Gillman has only recently become aware of the realization of 2 units at Miami Fort which were projected in the Zimmer Preliminary Safety Analysis Report and possible complicity by the Amy Corps of Engineers involving a possible loss of freedoms of Doug Gillman if the Azuy claims that a Public Document Room on military property would be superfluous, and by recently Doug Gillman means the third week of November when he made an impromptu sales trip to Lawrenceburg, Indiana; and also these issues could not have been raised earlier (i.e. in 1975) because the 3 Mile Island incident established that the piisher (ion exchange resin) transfering system is actually a safety related system and that assimilation of this fact by Doug Gillman leads him to bring forth Contentions 3,4 & 5 which deal with the fact that the ion exchange resin transfering~ system at 1

the Zimmer plant is safety-related.

l

.s e

e 9