ML20069E760

Forwards Corrected Page 3/4 3-13 to Amend 106 Which Reflects Deletion of Steam/Feedwater Flow Mismatch on Amends 106 & 99

ML20069E760
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	06/03/1994
From:	Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20069E763	List: ML20069E760 ML20069E767
References
NUDOCS 9406080019
Download: ML20069E760 (2)

Text

+= .

Southern Nuclear Operating Company l Post Omce Box 1295 ]

Birmir gham. Alabama 35201 Telephone (205) 868-5131 h k o.ve uo,ey Southern Nudear Operating Company -

Vice President Farley Project the Southern eieC!nc SYSlern June 3,1994 10 CFR 50.90 Docket No. 50-348 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Amendment No.106 Technical Specifications Page Correction Ladies and Gentlemen:

Amendment Nos.104 and 97 to the Farley Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications were issued December 29,1994. These amendments changed the Technical Specifications to allow elimination of the steam /feedwater flow mismatch reactor trip (Table 4.3-1, Functional Unit No.14). The amendments were to be implemented upon completion of necessary design modifications following each unit's next refueling outage. Subsequently, Amendment Nos.106 and 99 (Units 1 and 2, respectively,) were issued May 16,1994.

These Technical Specifications amendments changed the surveillance test intervals and allowed outage times for the Reactor Trip System and Engineered Safety Features Actuation System which affected Table 4.3-1. At the time Amendment Nos.106 and 99 were issued, the plant modification to eliminate the steam /feedwater flow mismatch reactor trip had been completed on Unit 1, but had not been completed for Unit 2. (The Unit 2 modification is scheduled for the spring 1995 refueling outage.) Due to the timing of the design change modifications and the issuance of the two amendments for each unit, Page 3/4 3-13 must be corrected to reflect deletion of the steam /feedwater flow mismatch on Amendment Nos.106 and 99. The updated page for the Unit 1 Technical Specifications is attached to this letter. The updated Unit 2 page will be forwarded upon completion of the Unit 2 modification.

The updated page provided with this letter is purely an editorial change not subject to 10 CFR 50.90 since Unit 1 Amendment Nos.104 and 106 have both been approved under this process.

[ ll f)

I 9406080019 940603 l PDR ADOCK 05000348 I p PDR

l

\

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 .

t 1

Ifyou have any questions, please advise. j Respectfully submitted, i f*/ bbcx,

/  !

Dave Morey '

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS$A DAY OF L/AtL/ 1994

))](Ltt NotaryPublic 1 t -

a/L U

bd7r My Commission Expires: // /C//97 Attachment MGr/ cit.rtstst. doc cc: Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. B. L. Siegel Mr. T. M. Ross Dr. D. E. Williamson