ML20069A566

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supplemental Motion to Compel Further Answers to Intervenor Interrogatories 4,5,6 & 9.Applicant Second Set of Answers on Interrogatories,Per ASLB 801222 Order,Were as Inadequate as First Set.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20069A566
Person / Time
Site: 05000142
Issue date: 02/06/1981
From: Pollock M
COMMITTEE TO BRIDGE THE GAP
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML20069A565 List:
References
NUDOCS 8102170059
Download: ML20069A566 (16)
v • d • e


Text

. . .. .. ..

i I

O s ..

DECIAllATICM OF MAHK S. POLIACK 5

4 I, MARK 3. POLLOCK, declare s i

1.-I an an attornt[y licensed to practice law in the State of f

California and in the courts of the United States, and the attorney of record for the Intervenor in the present action, Campus Committee to Bridge the Gap.

i

2. This hearin6 before the Atomic Jafety and Licensing Board

(" Board") regards the applicaticn of the Regents of the University of j California to the I;uclear Regulatory Commission for the renewal of the

) .

operating license of the research reactor sited on the campus of the

]

i- University of California at Los Angeles.

) 3. Intervenor propounded the first set of interrogatories regarding i

Contention 11 on or about' October 20, 1980, and received answers from Applicant .to those interrogatories on or about November 14, 1980.

Cn or about November 25, 1980, Intervonor filed a motion to compel i

l D further answers to interrogatories 4.5,6, and 9 On or about December I

22, 1980, the Board issued an. Order (tranting Intervenor's Eotion to Compel.

Board also directed Intervenor to "promptly pursue all records offered to date or records offered in the futura." (Order, p.4. ) On or about i

December 30, 1980,~ Intervenor requested of Applicant those records offered ty Applicant in its Answers to Intervonor's First ' Set of Interroratories.

l On or about January 19, 1981, Applicant notificd Intervonor it was prepared

~

to make available' the relovant financial and accounting records, offer of which Intervenor immediately availec' itstilf, but Applicant made no nention of- nor provision for making available the other records requested I' 'and previously offered by Applicant (operating logs, scheduling ' data,-

. specialized Annual (Activity) Reports, and Craduate student . theses and sloairoest

. - . .._= = . _ - . -.

1

-dissertations.) On or about January 22,1)81, Applicant made further .

answers to Interrogatories Ios. 4,5,6, and 9, in response to the compelling '

' order i$ssued try the Board. It is those Further Answers that are the subject  ;

i- t of this Further !!otion to Compel. On or about February 4, Councol for Intervenor contacted Counsel for Applicant arwi renewed request for those records previously offered and not yet rode available; Intervenor ,

provided Applicant with a list of those records.

4. Applicant's Further Answers to Interrogatories I!cs. 4, 5, 6, and 9 I are found by Intervenor to be as fully inadequate as the previous set of answers. Intervonor thus requests the Board to further compel

'i .

The basis of

~

Applicant to provide further answers which are adequate.

inadequacy of response to Interrogatories !!os. 4.5,6, and 9 is set forth below.

5. The deficiencies as to these responses to Interrogatories 4, 5, 6, and 9 are nanifest upon an examination of the questions, the original responses and further answers to them, arvl Intervenor's I argument. The deficiencies are further rade clear by Attachments A and B l hereto, which clearly show that information Applicant asserts it does r

not possess is indeed in its possession, clearly demonstrating the need for a further order of this Board compelling further answers to -!

I j theco interrogatories. The interrogatories, answers and contentions 'of Applicant are, in order propounded, in the following argument au follows:

i In terroratory fio. - 1 For each of 'the years 1960 up to and including 1980 please specify:

a. What portion of the cost of maintaining and operating the Reactor was devotbd to sales and services? '

_4

b. What portion of the cost of maintaining and opera ting the Roactor uns devoted to research?

, c. What portion of the cost of :aintaining and operating tho heactor uns devoted to education?

d. What portion of the cout of nain taining and operating the Noactor was devoted to tntining?

Interrora tory No. 2 For each of the years listed in Interrogatory 1 specify precisely n

h how and by what method the costs of raintaining arxl operating are being allocated to the functions of sale or services, education, research and traininc.

Interrocatory lio. 3 Specify the Source of the data on which the answers to Interrogatories 1 and 2 were based, including both summarios and rau data sources, such as log books ard invoices.

A)

(

\J ***

IPTUT:CCATORY 1:0. 4 For each answer to Interrogatories 1, 2, and 3 specify precisely how the various Reactor functions are defined :

a. What is the definition of rencarch?
b. What is the definition of education?
c. What is the definition of trnining?

d . Wha t a n) sold services?

-5

1 AliSWER TO_ Ii?TERROGATORY UO. 4:

The " function" of the Research Reactor in the !!uclear Encrcy Inboratorios at the UCLA canpun is education. That education takes the form of research and training, as unll as formal classrocia Ins truc tion.

Thoro are no activities of the Reactor unrelated to oducation.

F_URTHER ATSilER TO ll"fERROGATORY I!O. 4:

Apjilicant previously ansucred this interrogatory by stating that e the " function" of the Research Reactor is education. While this rerains (m!

true, Applicant uill rake available, pursuit to Rule 33(c), Federal Rules of Civil Frocedure, its financial and accounting records which include, the operations of the Research Reactor which are relevant to this interrogatory.

(See letter of January 19,1981).

ARGUIGiiT REGARDI!:G__II:TEPROPATORY 1:0. !! :

Applicant's Further Answer is no less incomplete and evasive than the first response. In neither case are the definitions sought in the

,a I )

'(j interrogatory provided.

In the first answer, Applicant asserts, without definition, that the function of the reactor is "educa tion." It states that education includes research, training and clasaroon instruction, again without providing a single definition sought in the interrogatory.

In the Further Answer, Applicant merely restates its assertion that the function of the reactor is education. As the Board stated in issuing tbc Onler compo111n6 further ansucrs, "While it night be true that everything concerned with the operation of the reactor or the

~ University is ' educational', ue do not think this simple answer is responsive to the information being sought." (Order, p. 3-4)

r. . - . , _. _ _

i jd "

,s N

' Applicant's only addi tional annuer is Llutt it will provide

{ ,

c O

Intervenor with financial records. It' is difficult to underst$nd how

, .\

Applicant expects Intervonor to extract Applicant'h definitions of

. .N y terms'such as "research" and "eduen tiori" frog"f4nancial and accounting

,I reconis which are relevant to this. interrog$ tor 'k Attachment A herein s

$  ?.. s

]p . shows a sample page of the financial. records Ap$1 cant has mde available.

d- i ml
  • Extraction of Applicant's definitinos of terns from'such records is i
  • -a c1carly impossible. ,

' I 2'

\s, As stated 'in the ar6urent to Interrogatory No. 4 \int.he Qvious

,4 w v-

,9 Motion to Compel, it is necessary for Intervenor to obtain evy ence of

.d '

and an understanding of Applicant'c definihlons of research, education, 3 s

training and sold services as they relate to the operati{n of this e>

N .%L. -

reactor, so as to facilitate a thorough hearing on t' a, n issues raised in, Conten tion II. The Board has pointed out the relevancy of\the questions ,

. -) r

,i. in its Order granting Eotion to Cor'pel (p. 3 .0nier: ["Theinterrogatcries ,

g -7 ,

J are without doubt relevant to the adirdtted contenti;or..") s ,It is now ,

4 N ,

incumbent upon the Applicant to respond to definitional querigg. '

Applicant's offer of financial docunents only evades '$ne of trey't.L:ary

)O , y *

.s [<

purposes of intorro6atories, which is for Intervenor to obtg{n L }

-~ s.

[f \g Applicant's own definitions and interpretations of its reckis and w gj operations under oath for purposes of' verification and $'r$p4chtent. t Applicant has relied upon the above . terms and simil .;b in=

i '

\ .[ J 1 s its Application for license renewal and in related connyd $tions W wita NRC-

., n.

, S taff. Furthernore, Applicant has been wil' ling to provide ly'C,Jtaff with a -

its definitions of related terrs, as evidenced by an April T/,1980, L

i letter. from Applicant to TBC Staff, included heroin as Attachment' B.

. .): This letter only becate available to Intervonor af ter filing it's first, i

.w. s'

,. Motion to Compel by the letter beconing available in [.KFublic Document Roon ys. .

l established in this case. Rather detailed definit' ions +ofhhcicr use' '
c x

.d N* h ty 4

~- -- .- .

, pg c - . -

n a1 Ja .

3, k" -

t .

categories are given by Applicant in answer to i;hC Staff questler.u,

~yet no definitions are provided to In tervenor in renponse to its s' interrogatories. Applicant nust be compelled to define the terris Intervenor has requested in Interrot7i Lory 4 An orderly and cooperativo

(. ,

discovery procens is crucial to a sourd resolution of the relicensing pro ceedings.

1 IIITERROCATORY !!O. 5 m

For each of the years 1960 up to and including 1980 please specify:

(L 3')<

a. What percent of the income derived from operating The Reactor vas devoted to the sale of services? .
b. What percent of the income derived from operating the Reactor was devoted to education?
c. What percent of the inecne derived from operating The 2eactor was devoted to research?

I A"5'<!ER TO II TERROCATORY 1:0. 4:

-m 1

I }

's J This interrogatory is objected to on the grounds tlnt it is vague, anbiguous an uncertain.

Notuithstanding that objection, the Beactor income is not allocated; it is pooled for the I:uclear Ener6y Laboratories as a whole. See Answer to Interrogatory I:o.1, which is incorporated herein by reference.

/

Ft'RTHER A3',7UR TO I!!TERRWATCHY I;0. 3:

As previously indicated in its nunwer to this interrogatory, Applicant is unable to secure the informtion from its files to te abic to categorice the income derived as requested by this interroCatory.

I;evertheless, Applicant uill agree to rnke available its financial and j I

accounting records of TEL income as set forth in Attachment A hereto.

i

.. - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ .- J

]RCUi$i{1' REGARDIUG 1RERHOCATOWI !!O._ja Once again, the Further Answer M no more responsivo than the first answer. Applicant says it cannot answer the question and is unabic to secure the infornation fron its filos yet Intervenor, upon thoso financial reconis being mde available referred to in tho i<urther Ansuor, uns readily able to pull out relevant informtion. Tho clain that Applicant cannot secure the requested informtion is simply untrue.

Attachment A heroto is a copy of a page of Applicant's financial reconis. As explained to Intervonor's representatives when they were (n) v I'rovided thcno reconis in Applicant's accounting offices, I;EL incono is c1carly coded and recorded. For exarrple, in Attachnent A, incone from within the University is coded "53" under " Typo Entry," and incone fron outside the University is coded "51." The amounts of incone are listed with a negative cicn under " Expenditures." Copios of separato invoices are included inthose financ3al records, so that one can confirn tnat a particular iten of incorre was from, say,a connercial entity and for reactor services. Thus, in Attachment A, under "Rechargos," the nur.erous n' entries for Emil K. Kalil, coded "51" and inserted with a negative si n 6

\.)'

(

under "Expenditurca" are all income fron sold services of the re:.ctor to a commercial user, Emil Kalil being in the ore assaying business. The assertion by the Applicant that it is unable to find in its own reconic the inforration requested is thus c1carly untrue.

This interrogatory is in the nature of an admissien in that Intervenor, although now being able to interpret Applicant's reconis for i toolf, requests Applicant to anchor the question itself, for purposes of verification ar.d impeachment. Resolution of this contentien will be nost difficult if the Applicant continuca to refuse to state, for cxample, how nuch incor.o it believen itself to bring in from connercial endeavors. The Further Answer provides no further ansuer to that question: the clain that the inforre tio" j A

c'loosn' t, exis t is un t.rne, intorvonor thus bolleyes Applicant rount be conpolled to answer.

INTERRMATORY "O, _ />:_

For each of tho years 3960 up to and includin6 19f0 please specify the soirco, amount, and naturn of all incono derivc<1 fron the operation of the reactor,

a. .For each year listed in Interrogatory 6, how nuch of the income was generated by the Reactor operation, as opposed to the cervices?

7 b..For each year listed in Interrogatory 6, specify each transaction involving the operation of The Reactor for which the I!uclear Energy Lab or the University of California received payment for the operation of the Reactor including:

1) The name of the contracting party;
2) The nature of the services rendered by the I!uclear Er.crgy Inb; ar.d
3) The persons who perfornoI the work.

A"S'lER TO INTERR0 CATCHY UO. />:

p -

(,) This interrogatory is objected to on the grounds that it is vacuo, anbiguous and uncertain.

Notwithstanding that objection. Applicant's financial records do not permit a separation of incono derived from the Reacter at UClis fron that for the Nuclear Energy laboratories as a whole. See Answer to Interrogatory No. 5. uhich is incorporated herein by rcrorence.

Ffm'IC'? AUJER TO IrTERRCCAT RY NO. 6:

As indicated by its previous answer to this interrocatory, Applicant has reviewed its financial reconis and cannot separate out Noactor incor.u as called for in this interrogatory. Applicant uill, however, make available to Intervenor its financial and accounting recon!s which include that informtion, as set forth in Attachment A hereto.

ARGUE!.7 REGARDII:C IUTERROGATORY UO. 6:

The Further Answer romins no nore responsivo than the first.

As indicated in Argument to Intorrogatory No. 5, Reactor incono is easily separable in Applicant's financial reconici computer codes indicate uhother income was from inside or outsido the university, name of user indicates commercial or research function, and the irdividual billings for each item of income indicato income was for reactor uso.

However, the names of the persons who perforned the work--casential in judging Applicant's claim of educational benefit in undertaking commercial work--cannot be determined from the financial records, nor-is it provided in the answers to the interrogatory. 'ihe informtion is doubtless available in the operating logs which have not yet tcon provided Applicant, despite repeated requests.

The argument regarding Interrogatory No. 5 is included here by reference.

II"TERROGATORY 1:0, 0:

For each of the years 1960 up' to and including 1980 specify how much of the Reactor operating timo uns devoted tot

a. thintenance
b. Classroon instruction
c. Commercial rental
d. EEL research not performed in connection with commercial reactor rental
e. Research by University personnel other than TEL or SEAS staff and not performed in connection with commercial rental of The Reactor.

r

f. Training of reactor operators g.. Other concral purposes.
h. Any other activity not included above which accounted for greater than fivo hours in any Given year.
1) For each function listed above or for any other functions that rny bo specified in the answer to Interrogatory 9, please define and describe what activities are being included within that functional category.

\'"/

At'SWER TO TUTERROCATCRY I'O. 9 Prior to 1971, reactor operatinC tiro was not categorized by function, and thus it is not possible for Applicant to provide any inforration for those years in the form requestel.

Beginning in 1971, reactor oper tting tino was categorized into three functions: (1) naintenance, (2) classroon instructions, and (3) research, This data is extracted from operating logs by the reactor

,-- supervisor and is reported in sunnary form to the UBC annually. L'pon i.

)

intervenor's roguest, the reported da ta can be nado available for examination at a nutually convenient time and place.

FUICJ1ER A::.rdER TO Ifri" ERR 0r.ATCRY 1:0. O s As irdicated previously, there is no functional categorization of reactor operating tine prior to 1971. Beginning in 1971, reactor operating time una catoCorized into three functions: (1)naintenance,(2)classroon instructions, and (3) research. As ntated in the previous ansucr, the financial and accounting records with respec't to these categories and within that time frane will bo made availabic to Intervenor at its request.

-- - . = . ._. - . . - - - .. . - ~ . - . .

4 r

'(300 also Att;tchment A heroto).

l ,

ARCUlT'r RECARDII'C ITTERROCATORY UO. 9:

The Further Answer to Intorrogatory !!o. 9 in an outright, defiance 3

! of the Order granting Intervenor's Ention to Compel. Not only is this l responco as equally . unhelpful as the virtually identical response 61ven 4

in the original answer to Ko. 9, but is known by Applicant as well as Intervenor 1

to be untruthful and nicleading. -

]

In.a lottor from Applicant to NRC Staff dated Jhy l'),1980, included herein as Attachment B, Applicant breaks down reactor uso for 1976-1979 l into seven categories that are virtually identical with the categories roguested try Intervenor'in Interrogatory 9 and which Applicant asserts t

is unavailable. Applicant clains infornation is available in only l throo categorios--mintenance, classroom instructions, and research--

and does not even provide that inforration, despite several requests for it.

1 l Yet six nonths earlier Applicant had provided detailed informtion reCarding reactor usage, ansigning precise annual hour figures for each categorica; in particular breaking "research" down into commercial, UEL Experiments, 1

l- UCLA Users, and Colleges and Universities, and providing definitions for each category. Applicant declines in answering Intervonor's Interrocatory 1

to mke any definition, claims infornation exists for only titreo categories,

and does not even provido that informtion. ,

. Applicant's responso to 1:RC staff questions predatos Intervonor's

.In Lorrocatories by over six months, yet the Answer and Further Answer to

. Interrogatory Uo. 9 deny any such knowledge and information. Thus the

-infornation Intervenor requested was clearly in the possession of Applicant

  • In each instanco uhoro Applicant in its Further. Answers references -

" Attachment A", it is referring to Attachment A of its Further Answers, lotter 'dat.ed January 19,19R1, offering to make available financini and

+ accountingirecoixls.- This is not to te confused with Attachment A of this

m,vthn- rnetnn in ce rn1

, - ,. , ,. . - ~ . . - - ,-

at the very tino it denied having such Inforration.

The information requcated is clearly rolovant to the contention in ques' tion. For example, the figures provided I;RC staff by Applicant but tho existenco of' uhich woro denir"1 in responso Intervonor's Interrocatories indicato that in 1970, the last year for which figures ucro provided, 607 of ' total port-hours woro for Cons ercial Usago, according to Applicant's own terms, and only 31 hours3.587963e-4 days <br />0.00861 hours <br />5.125661e-5 weeks <br />1.17955e-5 months <br /> for Engineering Classes and only 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> cach for ?:EL Experiments and laintenance. These figurcs arc clearly rolovant ,

i to the contention and alculd have been provided Applicant, especially

(I L/

af ter board's conpelling Or3er. l Intervonor rained access to this inforn3 tion only af ter submitting its initial Motion to Compel, because the letter only thereafter tecano available in the recently established Public Docunent Econ. Intcrvenor still needs figures for 1980, not included in the letter to !;HC Staff, as well as other information included in the Interrogatory.

Applicant's offer of financial and accountirg records in its f " 's:

Further Ansucr is conpletely evasive. Financial records deal with noney LJ na tterr. : by Applicant's own adnlosion in its Ansucrs, reactor usage in hours por year are extracted fron operating logs, which have not yet leen nade available to Intervonor, despito its requests. The offer of Financial Records as Further Answer to this Interrocatory is totally unresponsive.

Intervonor wishes a full an1 detailed ansucr to the Interrogatory, which Applicant continues to refuse to provido.

. CONCU'ilu:

Intervenor bol.ieven that Applicant's continual failure to be responnivo and forthcoming in mootinr its diccovery obligations, even nf tor issuanco of a conpolling Onlar by tho Boani, would nake a request for nanctiono purcuant to P.H.C.P.7/(b) appropriato undor theco circumotancoa.

Houover, uinco this in the initial stage of diccovery, we would prefer to attenpt.once more to have these problems corrected without resorting to requests for punitivo r.casures. We reserve the riC ht, nonetheleus, should p)

(, an additional compelling Order be Franted by the Bonni and Applicant continuo to bo nonresponnive, to request canctions at sono future point if those problems are not reco1ved. It diould be c1 car that the responnes to dato are both wasteful of parties' timo and contenticus, contributing nothing to the ongoing diocovery process.

Inter *;cnor recornizec that the Board ray view Applicant's failure to respond adequately to dato as not merely an evasion of Intervenor's ri , hts t to discovery and Applicant'c discovery responsibilitica, but also as (v ) defiance of the Board's Order compelling further ansucrs. For its part, houover, Intervenor at this juncturo merely requests a Supplemental Onler Corpelling Further Annwers.

Intervonor fools Applicant's reptitive offer to inko availabic the financial and accounting reconls regarding these Interrogatories is unresponsivo.

As noted in the Onler granting Motion to Compel, Applicant is a " sophisticated university" and nhould be "open and candid as to the details of all existing reconic." Where pcanible, Intervenors have pursued all records offered, although only a portion of those have to date actually been rade available; however, the Interrogatories request more than what can be gleaned from the financial recon]s so far offered. Lcfinitions of terns, reactor usage by hour, and other information are not to be no founcl. A conpolling Culer seem onen ,cain wcom,3 v rv e r un rna connl at e .,nmm*n t o t he T- tervom t nring.

Infornation requested by Intervonor Ina been Luico denied, under oath, to exist, even af ter a compelling Onler from the Board, ovou thourh, as Inttirvonor han heroin dononutrated Applicant clearly posseanon the inforration in quantion and han in fact even provided some of tho allegedly non-oxistent data to !!RC Staff in reqponco to ita questions. AlI future discovery la at stake if Applicant does not begin to be nore responsivo.

Intervonor vicus its role in these proceedirga as askin6 questions and providing infornation helpful to the floard in rnking its final decisions, infornation that uould not be available otherwise ucre the Intervonor not a party. For that reason, Intervenors are cranted by URC regulations discovery rights and Applicanta are given dincovery responsibilitics (and vice versa). Intervenor cannot perform its role in theso proceedings if Applicant fails to live up to 1 ta discovery obligations. Intervonor hereby respectfully requesto the 3oard grant its suppionental motion to compel further annuers to Interrogatorien 4, 5, 6, and 9.

t /

O ,- y w-

-;f '

/

-f i/RK yy p K DATED: February 6, 1981 l l O t

/

3 5 a

\. . -M- 81 tr e

. I' .

th . el.

l'8 ()

8 _8 t.ri3 3

  • 44 59
  1. ,4 eli g et 6 # t-)

4' ,. ..I' of n k) ' 4 Le*

Ef3 *

L U7 y __ _ .. _ . _ . . .

vi O t.J

()

O.

($ / .f "U 'I tfo

%. tr u)

. t1 Pt >

N .3 f7 It O /

hJ

~ . . _

O"h a f 6 0 4 i I 3 0 8 4 0 e 0 4 8 i I 8 1 1 8 3

t. ' O tt) t'n .- Ci O r4 (J in th i .') < t n (i a . O e i t) (e e 4 O *D 'v s s O r o f.f t o ro o O f
  • s. f. tf) 4 -l $' sa e- ( a s (s v.) s gis u n t o 6t* t 4 O als O ti t. ( 8 Os CL)

.s,. rr r)

(") 19 . f == 3 e- f M

. . . . . .3re . . . . . s Li.t O C 3 ( .3

. . (Y.)

O W *- ' O 17 t ** ' ' O C- ifi e i ut in e9 t'. 't47 *f 9 f*. P f9 m 9 e O (pin o .? . ci

.M to si t 1* t.J @Ed .- ( ti e

  • f f = F= f
  • 1.' tw EnM f* 3 W D e f* * ..k
  • F 40 l a- f* *!  ? O *$'Df') CO
  • Ift 'l f1 fh I.1 .* e- 0. to th(*.' D '2 40 m . 'I. . . 01 4D. *- LA N *- r)C.e

/ f3 .- 6g On .- .-.-.-. .* e. *f C")

in 8 C4 in 8') 't n 40 - e-

>< l La l l

LA i t.2

.) M i a i i i i t i l l 6- / 0 c) - f' ci o m gn ci O O O

) .t I

("I f*1 tf1

  • f . (3 (w e . . . .t. .

(1 O. O.

li)

. 6- 6. 6 .. tD #9 6 .f * (b O O O t.4 e I - t?) f . 1.'s ti) f u ./ O t- (D f*

ta .t. V f7 (J.

. v.

> rr V.I 4 C.) . . CD.

L' 44 O .* fW f3 C) . r1 fI fe te (Q c) y 8 tv e.

rs

  • % (t (L

( *if 6.4 4

,g

.' ?- ,', (. p . _ . . - . . _ . . _ . . _ _.. . . _ . _ . . . . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _. __

t- ,Jj g) h,J . . . O........................

  • ," g l{ g --.. O. .- O Eai3 O. O..CD() - .. f 3 O O. O. O. Oi . . . . . . .-.fgCa Osrs (5 r s C. ():.t. Op .- . Op dee .(h - g.) (71 O Cl Og th (73 O O () ()

- . . ,-,,c. m g, (3 (1. e., tv - - ..

  • ,.g (*) (*)

g ;) . . . t') f9 t7 f) (*) f 7 t') f") f1 r1 (7 t'l. P1 (7 . . . . . . . . . . ( v .d a er f y (98 2 t *3. e c) O P3 r) t .- rg M. c)

.J e -

., m, . . . . . s e) ('1. (*) .. .....................

n ') I- f4 F) f

  • f') P1 f*) f*) f1 f9 f*l P1 P1 r') r1 (J on ry (g e. () O O (), - ( 3 ,- g1 tg .. (v r) (*) (*) f9 c) f1 L6 y

(W 3>

,o . n . s _ O O 41 (t O () eattE713 eat.3 U LD

e. O ( 3 .- -.-.-.-Oe- e e- .- .- e .- O e a (p

.s.,),, e s. O, , ,

  1. .. Q @ ie) a.

O t*

[ $a f t/) t/1 i .

ett O aft O O O O O f a ()

e so , 6'su...oa.-..-----

( , ti o m m .c .n tu C6 c . f) on th r.,t*,f1() O O O (3 O

() t 1 ( i ( a f.3 r) f) rie efi O ta 80 f 9 in tD

o. ci us ), ci ci

-* ll C .O. ThOt'sO(h

.-f,) 4 Oe 3 (bci q (J tB a, b (t () 44 C) [3 (D (3 (3 ap O

- . . . + . . . _ . . . . . . .

O.---,.-e- .-..e . . .. .- e. .. re (7 ($ (*) #9 (9 8.l Cs r) r) r) (1 t') (7 f1 (9 r) f7 f7 t-1 r7 r1

.* , i s *= . .- - - .- - u s t() 6.l tD ift u) til O to un in in to af t tre @ (f) to in u) un tre ti) u in nyt af) un u) in N

.t. # . .- () "* . t o t . .si ... r* C t . O fa

.c e .-> I:l n. n. < . r e cr f s re r.e.e.< tre .tc.asrr.erar .aaesrt).vetu.c . . e o o s u.

La e c.e f 4 o o - .. - - c.

- J. to Li ne f.: sa er..a L. n on (s et

  • jWi

. n e g, c o ign r;3 4,3 o o ,rn ,,f.sc s e , o o g, O

  • 7 tf' g e- ._I.* 3 3 et..t tf.4 U8 60.ef_) IA 10. 60 Lf) t_o_ .af t t.f)_U1 t.h_ in. tn u.

te u

.*.I I s bt. A O t t' /

u.
  • t 1. J GA M in (It (A 40 LA 4A In (A F) 8/9 u) 4,1 J u8 to  : ;e 1 ()6 6 e e. e- p- e. 6 6- D H t 1 f) tai tal b3 DJ naJ bl O CD '

gg I

.)h lj .' ,.' n r*

ts

. .4 ..e... ..

hi aC 66 to L. h. ta. h. ts t h. ta

...4 .4 . 4 4 64 e4 .e rr ty 6. H s. 6. b t-La. ta, t. E .. . tal at ;") .,,) 3 ;) 3 3 .... . . . . . . . , , . . . . . ..,4J...

L') f0 ()

. 1 .............,.........

. 1. . ; '

/ t La s.s e.f

.a .c: .- .. .. 6.8684.,8

/ . .tai/hJ. ta.l . 4.0 .La..- 6.n.........t.6..J..l.#

ta.l.ta a ta.a . . . . / d t- t 6-J.8O e-.-....-........-......a-c,OO/

J.1 J.4.J O m aa

't 1 () n.s us ta s i. A to us sea tal s. A L# ba us uJ 4 7 OU6 D6- F- t .A .J # .J .J . A J.J.8.J e 8 8 8 9

/ ,4

,}

e

e. (O C3 t' . f.) 8.3 L.a un t.) i:1 (d C3 f.I 80 ta 6. O U) 4A on sh 4A .4 .I 4 .a *( 4 et et a. .I O C4 ** Os (* ./(

,c . .

.I ta. i,a t . ... ..... . .a l.a .a .. .. ... .. .a to ,a t,o a.. ,

t

.a-.

o

..... .. -. ./. x v v < < v v r v v r.. n n .. n .4

. , < . . .r<s < v o t. . .a n .i .o.

.t* :I v / t i e a t .e e n ( ne.8.9 ( s . ; t e c A> r if :.3i e i4.8 r a .. t, sf n. . u. t. . . ; 7 til i et .4 .f O 8 ./1 ..s 4u. e . . . . . . .J . J . J .3 J.J.9.4.4.4O O st 1*

l l . s n et a . s. #t si no n s et #1 n o .e.i e.4 e.a.s....4 eei e . . . . . > ttt#4ititt ad * . . .

  • 7 . . . .. . " :' ; .- ** .I .I .e et et at . l . . * 'l ' ' la en la ses a e e e t a e t a t o pa sa w e.sa e.s  ! . ..#
    • !T

.I

.I' t - fu he us us e.s et. ea sa Les i.e e.f sa t.e 4 8 asa i4e to a /',' ' e.# ei / / t t t 16 + - ~ * = - - - + ' -

p 000o.0 004..t. o,...t.00 00 0 00 v..

.] o . . < , 0 0 0 0 0 0. o. 0 0 0 0 s i n. o . . t . oosio 6

eis.ti u . . . . .. - . . . . . . . . - . .

41.' .: l .4

  • O 0,ta t't uf U.Osto P.to 41 m (*1 C. th De C ' Os 0* (? On On O) ni u.C. O= D. W C1 Ci O* 0+ P Da 0 t- ID to Un itt (U tD C) . (D f') f') (*) f*> P1 t') r1 f*) P) t's CD f*p t-I P3 M 08 f1 t') ri (1 P3 (1

,n, ' l r en . . EU (3 (U in tu f18 . _. -

  • g . @ @ TOLD QIDt.')b'l13 W Qf")@ Q O 0) (h On f9t {h 06 (h (f4 0e vfI Di (b O. Os O Us (f. 01 0. O (b O U1 e ga " 'i .#

t ,. 66. () CD CD O4 O(t(. t3 (D t9iDOf3 O fD f D f a t1 (b O (8 4 e (t t 3 .t t3 (p (9 FS ( . f . rs .'s ( e ( e 4 3 O (t .e i 1l'. .t 3g,(gg3eegn (3 4eg3 et (t aeeeg3gg ee ggatagoge (3 (1 gy(3gp43 46(t fateae f9 49 4.t9 fp (D (9

.y l , .3 . cm ,o,, ,,o,. .. , o , c . t, . e, ,- .

. . 4,.

. .. m, . ., c .

.,,,o.

,e,, a o, c..n,. o, o. c,. . . .. .w. . .. c e. c .e o,1,.

c.c 4,. ...

L, .,.\ fu en --.

t,.

a. -c -a,- e- c. - -o. . o,

. -o, - -u c. o, .. . . . ..

o.., m o o. o, o. . o. . c. c . ..o u.

.. o. o o, m

. 4 "-

af'fe , gg **[ t - -

  • gg *

. ,.a in in in . .. . vi .o .o in if .r. i. , in u .a u . .. in e, in ia . o u n af. i i in tn in .

ta sviQin. t. .oq.* in in.

ia ei .. . a.

5-t.' ta n L e t t. sti t.t t.s 64) 4. ta t est s 's a .i ai tsati a e, s qis L . 4e 0 tJ 1.1 O d's O W 41 g ao.soft o e ta9 t .O 't *:

  • t *f o =f .in 7 tf ) *t er .I at*g *t 't 'I 3 ,er .e t e t ' f .* r. a f. ,* t, . f S F. 4. *,f o; .o...........

t i...t .. . .

7. I
  • t. 4 . . . t t....o

,o f,to f. .e r. ,.e t e r.

. . f. o..t.s.. n.,, ,

,.,o.,,.....4,t,s..,.........(.

.t. .t. ..

. e a 9 9 r9 9 99 9 - =a y y 9 .a a>. y y % . y .o , ,.a9e..........................

y 9 u 9 99 9 .- v99 .
La

.f,

. l. /s pa r n n u i n .t 9 y or 9 .s v v v u ,9 r .i n r .i . v v ' u n .i .: n r v tr .: . .i .t v . . . . _

imelmNman ,ly.1 lO UNI I N110J.W \ IN!!O li'lV3 10 A IINWl Al,s e r y ,o i i . .J

- ATTAClliW;bT D .

. g (; () ,"~, 2, (l () . 6.b3 u

. I TNIYF.llSITY OF GA l llDlih l A.1.( iS Ai,l .1 i .F.S

-~- ... -- - . ..

, asilts.Il t )

  • 3 s.4 4 is . p s e s 1.* t' . I t ia. A r. +.1 t.' , . 8-84 .1 ' If 4 ' * $ Ali 3 . 8 t
  • s a

$ A ?a i P 4 N. r.e.it  ![ '}

,1

. , ' ,#, , , q _. ' 4 N 1 % es s tip t p t

  • t s.

i t g # '4 'I.

  • lf,1, $

til a it f . UI' t.?.VII ' iN !.tl..N 1 A L !!' 41 Til % *.II S

  • f'3.TY Tillt t'l N il.it i Olt l ait; it?.4 8.I t! H ll Ne t s A f t. .n -Ja.! 1 I s, t's t it t;HNI g 9. 1 :a M a :.- 1 :! , 1 11 S 0 i

':U.S Cin lO l

Robert W. Reid, Chief Ope ra t. ilu; i:eu c tors liranch .d.1 United St a ter. i;uc] ear Rogu Ia tory Co:n:.ii s s ion Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. lleid:

e RE: l>OCKET NO. 50-142 -

E nc i.ospyd i t.

Ihe additiont.1 inforrnition you requested in cour let ter of April 17, 198G, regarding the applie'; tion 1er tho 'tcense rr.newal of the '.'CLA reactor . The informatio*:

provided your letter.

is clearly keyed to the fifteen (13) i tens pc: ad in Th o' enclosed inforraation has been revieweil by various me:nbe r s o f UCLA*U Rediation Use Com:nittee and by uyself If you need further details concerning these, or oi.her points, pleas.e let tr.e k n ov. .

O Very truly yours.

q/ 6./L y.? -- /^.'j v/

Waltor F Wer* n t Is i rce ter , Hesca' .:b 1 Oi'Cultat,ional ,afety WFW/1:

C:tc ,1 os u re i

'D A k eL F k' Q O 3 ,* c o % %

,. 4 5 . -

sg, l Table 111/1-3 p%ovides hatttslycius af M.tetor cretation fo's usca'nch,

. clara instituction, and untintenane . Class inshuction account.s fort onbt 8% of .the total hotttts of opr ettion. .VCcase ptovide a breaklown j . in h6u'ts/ year of Zlte types of rescutrcit phoq' tams conducted and tite types of caskmeAs for whom .tivis schuleo nots pcAforuned. s s Table 111/1-3 will be retitled REAC10R USAGE and will be replaced with the tabic and explanations which follow here Detailed figures for years prior to 1976 are not.available.

. REACTOR USAGE ACTIVITY  !!0URS PER' YEAR t' .

i 1976 1977 1978 1979 AVG.

i -

I 17 83 52 31 46 l m Engineering Classes, NEL Experiments 4 31  ; 9. I 11 Maintenance 23 14 . m 34 1 18 I UCLA Users 109 106 105 91 103

<- Colleges & Universities 65 ' 47 % 37 53 46 10 6 7 5 7

, . Demonstra tions

- Commercial 1 5 95 264 91 Total Port-Hours

  • 208 290 340 446 3 21 Actual Run Time 184 238 271 372 278 Equiv. Full Power Hours 131 159 203 294 1 97

/

  • Port-Hours are a measure of user demand, two concurrent users for one hour cor. tribute two port hours.
  • Instructional and maintenance hours are counted as one port-hour per hour.

2 Engineering Classes include both graduate and undergraduate laboratory work which includes basic ccunting, activation analysis, reactor parameter determinations and operator training and requalification.

l

! f!EL gEx ieriments are conducted by the reactor staff and include j seed irradiations, gem coloring experiments, activation analysis, tracer studies, isotope production using the fl-P reaction.

\

l UCLA Users include the Chemistry, Geology, Geophysics, Meterology, and fluclear Medicine Departments. The types of experiments include l

activation analysis, tracer studies, delayed neutron counting.

l I

s .

"~

]Nr' h .

Colleges arni, liniversi ties include C.li f ornia l'olytechnic In*,Li tute, J

I yy- Calif ornia insf.ilnle of lechnology. Calif ornia State University -

- ;</ los Angeles, Cali f ornia S ta te Univer s i ty - fiorthridge, liarvey tiudd College,

) -

Mt. San Antonio College, Pierce College, University of California - Santa

  • Barbara and University of California - San I)lego.' The. types of experiments performed are activatten analysis, fission track counting, tracer studies, reactor parameter determinations dreactor operating

.' traini,ng.

characteristics, reactor '

" operationt.,

. , [,f.'

shielding;, ' studies and he Demonstrations were actual reactor runs in which the reactor was

'taEen critical to demonstrate reactor parameters, characteristics or operation. Tours in which the reactor was shut'down are not included.

liigh schools, Pierce College, the press, Southern California Edison Co.

and the University of California Extension were r'ecipients

' -' of reactor demons tra tions. ,

_Commericial User _s include geochemists, gem dealers and engineering firms. Mineral assay through activation analysis and delayed neutron counting, gem color alterations, and radiation shielding studies '

typify the types of experiments performed.

t:0TE: _ Total Port-Hours, Actual Run Time and Equiv. Full Power llours Deviations between~ the reported port-are included in this table.

hours and the Total Port-Hours, ape due to roynd,off; errors.

- . n ., , ,. ,

c ' i e , :n  :.A : ; -

v. .

y .; . .

u..- ,.4 t

af.

6

) .

y i.

9

.a l , . .

i 3

.t i

e 9

! I UNITED STATE 3 0F AlElllCA I *

  • i:"CIEAR IfECULATORi C00111S310D

~

,- _PEFOliE Tl!3 ATONid SAFI'1 PY A! D LICEI.J1:;C DOAlfD ll In the Matter of )

Dockot No. 50-142 TIE RECESTS OF TIE UNIVE!!31TY OF CALIFOR:!IA (Froposed Roncual of Facility Licenso)

(UCLARoccarchReact.or)

CEltTIFICATE OF SERVICE I heroiry cortify that copics of "F001CE OF SUFFLEiEI;TAL LOTION A:.D SUPPLEIE!:TAL E0fl0M TO CCIFdL FURTHElf AUSUERS TO 11;TERROCATORIE3; DECLARATIO::

of I: ARK. S. FOLLOCK" in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this 7th day of February,1981: ,

s Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq. , Chairnan Kr. Steven R. Tekosky . 1 Atomic Safety and Licensing Boani Environnental Section U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 200 Dorth lain Street Unshington, D.C. 20555 City Hall East, Room 215 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dr. Erimeth A. Luebke, L'enbor Atomic Safety and Licensing Board - Docketing and Service Section (3)

U.S. Nuc1 car Regulatory Commission Office of the Jecretary Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Uuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Oscar H. Faris, 1.cmber Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Counsel for ..RCu Staff ,

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission {a.S.,.uclearRegulatoryCommission Washington, D.C. 20555 " shingt n, D.C. 20555 William H. Cormier, E$q., Evan Knicer Office of Administrative Vice . Administrative nssistant Chancel lor atate Senator Alan oleroty University of California 11340 U. Olympic roulevani 405 !!11 gard s Angeles, C.i 900%

' Angeles, CA 90024 Representative Anthony rollenson Christino !!cluick, Esq. U.S. House of hepresentatives Clonn R, Woods, Esq. Washin6 ton, D.C. 20515 Offico of Conoral Counsel '

2200 University. Avenue l 590 University 1:all Berkeley, CA 94720 '

]

f$ ^ , 27 /

%RE yyF0HfiCK

[Cour461forIntervenor

[ .

s

-- m -' *% p? -D-- r  :-q ~ -- -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20069A566&oldid=2936496"