ML20067D590

Suppls Responding to Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-358/80-05.All Design Document Changes Will Receive S&L Engineering Site Approval Under Existing Procedures Prior to Final Acceptance

ML20067D590
Person / Time
Site:	Zimmer
Issue date:	05/06/1982
From:	Borgmann E CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20067D588	List: ML20067D590
References
QA-1702, NUDOCS 8212210031
Download: ML20067D590 (2)

Text

y -

a.

p e

TIIE CINCINNATI GAS & EIX.CTitIC COMl'ANY d

==

C'"C'"

^ "' """ '

ZIMMER POWER STATION, P. O. BOX 201, MOSCOW, OH 45153 May 6,"^1982 QA-1702 l

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Region III l

799 Roosevelt Road l

Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Attention:

Mr. J. G. Keppler Regional Administrator RE:

WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 1

1. E. INSPECTION REPORT 80 DOCKET NO.

50-358 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO. CPPR 88-W.O. #57300 JOB E-5590 FILE NO. NRC-1 80-05 Gentlemen:

This letter constitutes a supplementary response to our letter, QA-1292, dated May 6, 1980, regarding the subject Inspection Report.

Item 3 of the original response adicated that instructions had been issued which stated that Design Document Changes (DDCs) are not permitted to be written to reflect an "as-built" condition and that all "as-built" con-ditions found in deviation of design drawings would be handled in the form of a Nonconformance Report.

In addition, the* response stated that the QA Department would review future DDCs to assure that they do not reflect "as-built" conditions that deviate from design drawings.

Since this response was issued, conditions have been noted when DDCs are required to:

1) Resolve interferences or deficiencies resulting from field con-ditions;

2) Expedite the performance of physical work on appropriately approved Engineering Change Requests (ECRs);

3) Disposition an in-process deficiency when a document change is considered to be the appropriate disposition of the deficiency identified during an in-process inspection.

8212210031 s21215 PDR ADOCK 05000350 My251EL e

PM

-J

g.**"

s

• Mr. J. C. Keppler Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III May 6, 1982 - QA-1702 Page 2 Under conditions 1) and 3) DDCs will be initiated to notify the 1

Architect / Engineer of a required drawing change to reflect the "as-built" condition. For example, conditions have been found where anchor bolt..

location must be modified in the field to avoid interference with con-crete reinforcement steel.

In such cases Design Document Changes (DDCs) have been and will continue to be initiated to notify the Architect / Engineer of a required drawing change to reflect the "as-built" condition.

All DDCs will receive the S&L Engineering site approval required

. under existing procedures prior to final acceptance of the work. Secondly, since DDCs may reflect "as-built" conditions as described in 1) and

3) above, QA Department review of DDCs to assure they do not reflect "as-built" conditions is no longer required. This policy is consistent with the design requirements of Criteria III and XV of 10CFR50, Appendix B.

We trust the above will be found acceptable as a supplementary response to the subject Report.

Very truly yours, THE CINCINNATI CAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY h

f""

E. A. BORGMANN SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FKP:ple cc: NRC Site Resident Inspector Attn:

W. F. Christianson NRC Office of Inspection & Enforcement Washington, D. C.

20555 l

.