ML20067C744

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Addl Response to NRC Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-266/82-12 & 50-301/82-12.Corrective Actions: Area Roped Off,Conspicuously Posted & Flashing Lights Used as Warning Device
ML20067C744
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/29/1982
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20067C739 List:
References
NUDOCS 8212100223
Download: ML20067C744 (3)


Text

.

lHsconsm Ekchc rowca couraur 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046, MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 November 29, 1982 Mr. J. G. Keppler, Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Region III U.

S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Dear Mr. Keppler:

DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 REPLY TO INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-266/82-12 (DETP) AND 50-301/82-12 (DETP)

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 This is in completion of our response, initiated on October 15, 1982, to your letter of September 15, 1982, which transmitted the special safety inspection conducted on May 3-4 and June 15, 1982 by Messrs. P. C. Lovendale and R. L. Hague.

At the time of our October 15, 1982 response, additional time was requested to adequately reply to the question of the control of areas within containment where the radiation levels exceed 1000 mrem /hr.

Prior to our October 15, 1982 response, we realized there were inadequacies in our Technical Specification 15.6.11,

" Radiation Protection Program".

These inadequacies were resolved in our submittal of Technical Specification Change Request No. 84 which, after several discussions with various members of the NRC staff, has been approved.

Among other changes, this revised Technical Specification now requires that "for individual areas accessible to personnel with radiation levels such that a major portion of the body could receive in one hour a dose in excess of 1000 mrem, that are located within large areas, including containment, where no enclosures exist for purposes of locking, and no enclosures can be reasonably constructed around the individual areas, then that area shall be roped off, conspicuously posted, and a flashing light shall be used as a warning device".

These revised Technical Specifications were implemented on November 19, 1982 and described to the plant staff via a health physics standing order on that date. 8212100223 821207 PDR ADOCK 05000266 G

PDR DEC 2 E02

e Mr. J. G. Keppler November 29, 1982 We believe that the above action, in concert with the plant staff's approval on November 18, 1982 of the modifications discussed in our October 15, 1982 response, brings to a conclusion our responses in this matter.

Should any further questions arise regarding these matters, please feel free to call us.

Very truly yours, i

Assistant V ce President C. W. Fay Copy to NRC Resident Inspector

~ _-

. b- - -

.. :5 y,3gg.. 3-_-,

y :-. :,.

.q, ~.,7_g;s..;.y. p.3 7

.q Items 2 and 5 are applicablo to your contaction and==re considered in arriving at our decision to issue a motice of violation. Item k was considered, but in our-avle+,;, has little bearing on who was at fanit for the entry. On the one band, it demonstrates that the operator ecumitten numerous errors during this incidents on the other hand, it raises questions regarding the adequacy cf your training and auditing programs for ensuring procedural adherenee.

g, p

,,ggy

.O. - ^ -

n

~

W"W

. - r.:,.

... ~

Mth regara to your segroot..

your request.ama semelede that.the mitatlan3a malia. 'TreseRaroM SJE

' M states: " Area surveys shall be sempleted ta potentia 23p hamarcous eyens 5

prior to peroommel entry." We rooognise that this is a generalinea 7

requisweest which any be modii' led in speelal situations. Mosever,as stated ta pour letter eated Detaber 15,1982,*the eenditions spesified in Procedure 1tP 2.T arhich would allor snodifteetion of the general survey requirement were mot met. -*therefore, 30 modiftention of the general annoy requiresent of Procedure EP B.E was applie=Mm.

~ U Eo response to this letter is necessary. 'Your scoperaties with us is appreciated.

~

sincerely, Original signed by A, Bert Davis

.l James 41. _Eappler Regional AA=1m1strator ec:

J. J. Each, Plant Manager 1

ec w/1trw sta 10/15/82 and

[

11/29/82:

m e/ Document control Desh (rim )

l Resident Inspector, RIII l

John J. Duffy. Chief I

Boiler Beetion Peter Anderson, Wisconsin's Environmental Decade j

l Btanley York, Chairman l

~'

Public Service t',==nission i

orr CEk

==--

g g g g -- --

gggg egg

_e_

  • E--

NRC F orm 3180 (H ID ) (178) NRCM 0240 DU.S. GOVE RNME N1 PRINTING OF F ICE : 1979 289 237 1

- - - -