ML20067B406
| ML20067B406 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/1982 |
| From: | Rausch T COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20067B382 | List: |
| References | |
| 5432N, NUDOCS 8212060181 | |
| Download: ML20067B406 (1) | |
Text
.
['
) One First National Plaza, Chictgo, lilinois Commonwealth Edison g
k '
.s
'7 Address R ply to: Post Office Box 767
(,/ Chicago. Illinois 60690 Novembe r 16, 1982 Fqi Qg,h,,__,,j 4
,L _ _ h t _ L _ _ _
bas.
v Mr. James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator fj9_
1 :,'E., l.
J' d _.__.,l Directorate of Inspection and
("
Enforcement - Region III Cf&_
M uJ. _.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission QW oj hio I
gtb)+(
799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 ML l_
l I
(
pE7TP l _,,,,i,,
OL l
l:lLE lM
Subject:
Quad Cities Station Units 1 and 2
~
Timeliness o f Emergency Planning Scenario Submittals NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 Re ference:
J.
A. Hind letter to Cordell Reed dated October 12, 1982.
Dear Mr. Keppler:
This letter is in response to the referenced letter concerning the timeliness of scenario submittals to FEMA Region VII.
At the time of the 1982 Quad Cities Station exercise planning effort, the exact role of FEMA Region VII in the planning process was not clear.
Contact had been established with FEMA Region V concerning the scenario meetings and submittals, since the station is located within this region.
Also, your o ffice was kept informed of progress in the areas.
Since that time, it appears that FEMA Region VII will be actively involved in the planning process.
Therefore, they will be included in submittals and meetings associated with future exercises at the Quad Cities Station.
It should be noted that only one exercise has been held at the Quad Cities Station since issuance of the FEMA Guidance Memoranda from your of fice to licensees on December 10, 1981.
Furthermore, the dates for submittals in Guidance Memorandum 17 are " milestones for planning purposes and actual schedules may need to be different because o f local circumstance s".
Our letter to J.
Keppler dated June 28, 1982, identi-fled the circumstances which necessitated later submittals for that e x e rcise.
We are confident that we will meet the intent of the advance notification guidance.
If you have any questions, please refer them to this o f fice.
Very truly yours, 8212060181 821201 jb
"~M PDR ADOCK 05000254 Thoma s
. Rausch F
PDR Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m cc:
Region III Inspector - Quad Cities NOV 171982 5432N
_ _ _ _ _