ML20066K566
| ML20066K566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 02/21/1991 |
| From: | Hairston W ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9102270264 | |
| Download: ML20066K566 (4) | |
Text
-
__ e t ~
s c
Atabima Power Comp:ny 40 invernas C4nter Perkw:y
+ Fbst Office Box 1295 Birmingham. Alabama 35201 '
.1elephone 205 BR5581 W. G. Hairston, Ill Senior Vee P esident Nuclear Operations g;gggjg g,g tre sewen wc miem February 21, 1991 Docket Nos.
50 348 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I
ATTN: Document Control Desk r
Washington, DC 20555 J. M. 'Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 I
Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen:.
Alabama Power Company hereby. submits Fitness For Duty Performance Data for i
the second six month reporting seriod, July 1990 through December 1990, as.
required b
-enclosure.y 10CFR26.71(d). T11s data is summarized on the. attached Should you have any. questions,_please advise.
~ Respectfully _ submitted.
.j 3
p.
I WGH.III/JMG
- Enclosures l
a cc: Mr.LS. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. HoffmanL Mr. G. F. Maxwell i
I
- /
i 9102270264 910221 PDR ADOCK 05000348 R
_ nmy, m nun musu Performance Data Personnel Subject to CFR 26
_ 90 12 Alabama Power Company COMPAM 6 MONTHS (NINNO
_ Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant tecatoN
_ J. A. Ripple (205)868-5075 CDNTAC1 NAM [
NONf UNCWDC ARLA ColO CutorFS: SCREEN /CONnRMATION (ng/ml) b APPENDIX A TO 10CFR 26 MARUVANA
/
AMPHETAMINE $
/
B8rbiturates 300 / 300 COCAINE
/
PHENCYCLIDINE
/
E1M0dialeDine$ 300/ 150 OPIATES
/
ALCOHOL (% BAC)
/
LONG-TERM SHORT TERM CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL PERSONNEL AVERAGE NUMBER WITH UNESCORTED ACCESS 1009 395 1291 REFERRED ACCESS CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE TO EAP RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE TESTED POSITIVE PRETMPt.0YMENT 0
0 0
0 0
0 PRE BADGING 157 1
90 0
1481 11 PERIODIC 0
0 0
0 0-0 4
FOR CAUSE 1
0 0
0 3
1 POST ACCIDENT 0
0 0
0 0
0 RANDOM 555 3
218 1
149 0
FOLLOW UP 10 1
0 0
37 0
OTHER Retest 0
0 0
0 3
0 TOTAL 723 5
3 2
308 1
1673 12 6/7/89
RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS INDMDUALS TESTED 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 2
4
/ # NEGATIVE 788 918
% POSmVE 0.25
.435 GRAPH 0F 5
l l-
% POSITIVE 4
3 2
^
1 v
v CONFORMED POSITlYE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUSSTANCES MARUVANA 2
6 COCAINE 2
8 OPIATES AMPHETAMINES 1-PHENCYCLIDINE ALCOHOL 1
'4 6/7/89 r eerv g
w6w -
r
---w w--m-
--7*e w-e
- =. - - -
n----
t----
s '_ _'
J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Fitness For Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from July, 1990 through December, 1990 has been reviewed and analyzed.
The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access. Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool while on tite. Testing is performed on a nominal weekly basis at a rate which will equal 100% yearly of the total population.
Two program weaknesses were identified as a result of an NRC inspection.-
One weakness related to the generation of the random selection list in that employees were eligible for selection on a weekly basis but repeat collections were not permitted during a collection week.
The random selection program was modified to allow multiple selections of the same employee during any testing week.
The second weakness related to the training of contractor ' supervisors.
Procedures regarding contractors have been amended to ensure that contractor supervisors receive training specified by the rule. No events reportable under 10 CFR 26.73 occurred during this period.
In summarizing management actions associated with the Fitness for Duty Program, it should be emphasized that the incidence of confirmed positive tests remains extremely low. Consequently, management actions relative to determinations of fitness for duty-have been limited to the few confirmed positive test results identified by the program on regular full time employees and four for.cause tests.
Contractor employees screened as
-positive are denied access and no further action is taken by Alabama Power Company in these cases.
7 Management actions during the reporting period involved-nine personnel, i
none of which was-a supervisor or an individual licensed to-operate the reactor. One: employee tested positive on follow-up testing md was.
terminated. A second employee tested positive for alcohol
.. suspended and referred to the EAP The employee was cleared to retu<n to work'after a negative follow-up drug and alcohol screen.. At that time, the employee -
was placed in a three-year follow-up testing program in addition to the-random program, and his access was restored. Two additional employees who tested positive were s.ipended for 14 days. _ During that time, one of-L these employees was referred to the EAP and was cleared to return to work after a negative ~ follow-up drug-and alcohol screen. At that time, the employee was placed in a three-year follow-up testing program in addition
- to the random program, and his access was restored.
The-second employee
-who tested positive was referred to the EAP and was still off work in rehabilitation'at the end of this period. Another individual was an
~ Alabama Power Company emp oyee who was assigned to Farley. Nuclear Plant in-1
-a support rolo. This emp oyee was returned to his previous operating group and his access has een denied for a period of three years.
The for cause tests involved one em)1oyee and three contractors. The em 1
tested negative and no furtier management action was necessary. ployee Two contractors also tested negative requiring no further action to be taken.
.The third contractor tested positive and access was denied.
F
..