ML20066F755

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-341/82-12.Corrective Actions:Qa Records Storage Procedures Revised & Surveillances Conducted to Verify Implementation.Commitment Made to Continue Audit Checklist
ML20066F755
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/07/1982
From: Wells D
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To: Spessard R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20066F750 List:
References
EF2-60506, NUDOCS 8211190161
Download: ML20066F755 (3)


Text

4

  • ^

Donald A. Wells Manaqer-Ouamy A%urance 0 13) 237 % 57 2000 Second Avenue 31 3-November 7, 1"82 EF2-60506 Mr. R.L. Spessard, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccumission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Subject:

Nonempliance at Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Construction Site -

IE Report 50-341/82-12

Dear Mr. Spessard:

This letter responds to the item of nonccupliance described in your IE Report 50-341/82-12. This assessment of Enrico Fermi Unit 2 Site Construc-tion activities was perforned by Mr. B.H. Little, Senior Resident Inspector of NRC Region III on July 1 - August 31, 1982, at the site.

The item of nonccmpliance is discussed in this reply, as requimd by Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. The finding and section nurber is referenced.

We trust this letter satisfactorily answers the concerns raised in your report. We will be glad to discuss any further concerns you may have.

Very truly yours, L

8 h

DAW /DF/cp cc: Mr. Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. Bruce Little, Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Coninission 6450 North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166 8211190161 821116 PDR ADOCK 05000341 NOV 5 G82 0

PDR

+

T!!E DETROIT EDISON CQ4PANY OUALITY ASSUlWNCE DEPARIMENT ENRICO FERMI 2 PROJECT Response to NRC Report No. 50-341/82-12 Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR Inspection at: Eermi 2 Site, Monroe, Michigan Inspection Conducted: July 1 - August 31, 1982

. _t yny)U_ h_ s Prepared By:

G.jenper, Idad Systems Engineer Construction Quality Assurance Noted By:

d N//2dV/tfe D. Ferencz, Acti pervisor Construction Qual Assurance

/

Approved By:

/

T.A. Alessi, Director Project Quality Assurance

Response to NRC Inspection Report No. 50-341/82-12 (82-12-02)

Statement of Violation, 82-12-02, Appendix, Item 2b Contrary to 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII and the Detroit Edison Fermi 2 Quality Assurance Manual, Project Quality Assurance failed to conduct re-audits to verify knplementation of the corrective action cmmitted to in the response to an item of noncmpliance identified in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-341/

81-09, dated August 15, 1981.

Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved NRC Inspection Report 81-09 identified inadequacies in the OA Records storage procedures of Detroit Edison and one of the safety-related site contractors.

When these procedures were revised to include the necessary requirments, OA surveillances were conducted to verify implementation. These surveillances, conducted on August 13, 1981, included all safety-related contractors at the site. Although this may not technically meet the OA Manual requirement for re-audit, the same actions were taken to verify proper implementation via the surveillances as would have been done in an audit.

A cmmitment was made sy Project Quality Assurance to " continue to include these requirements as audit check list items to verify implementation". This cmmitment was not effectively cmmunicated to OA personnel responsible for developing the check lists. On August 11, 1982, a mmo was issued by the Acting Supervisor c # Construction OA to rmind audit personnel of the need to verify required elements of OA Record storage and protection on audits which include Criterion XVII. All such audits since the memo date have included these requirements.

Corrective Action to be Taken to Avoid Further Noncmpliance The Construction OA audit scheduling procedure will be revised to more clearly require that all applicable parts of each Criterion will be audited once every 12 months.

Date When Full Cmpliance Will be Achieved The audit scheduling procedure will be revised and issued by November 30, 1982.

.s