ML20066F348

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application for Amend to License R-125,changing Description of Tech Spec Section 3.3, Reactor Safety Sys & Removing Pool Water Level from List of Measuring Channels Required in Section 3.2
ML20066F348
Person / Time
Site: University of Lowell
Issue date: 01/15/1991
From: Beghian L
MASSACHUSETTS, UNIV. OF, LOWELL, MA (FORMERLY LOWELL
To: Michaels T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20066F350 List:
References
NUDOCS 9101230272
Download: ML20066F348 (2)


Text

. ~

.y9 b_

q* ::}'

96neveuay Rd

$ne $Amkeudyfwuw-li

$<w$

1JJacktJcNs 0/854 I (508) 452 5000-3 January -15,1991 Docket No. 50-223 Reactor R-125 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision Washington, DC. 20555 Gentlemen, The University of Lowell ~ Reactor wishes' to submit the following changes ~ to our Reactor License-(R-125) Technical--

Specifications These changes -are as follows:'

l. Change the description of 3.3, ReactoriSafety. System', page

~

IV-18 concerning the. function of thel Reactor; Period from:

" Automatic reactor scram" with <3 sec period, &-

e Reg Rod prohibit <l5 se'c period" to:

" Automatic reactor scram with; <3 sec period, &

control blade inhibit with < 15 -sec period.~"

The Regulating Rod has. never 'had-any automatic safety features and, in fact, is not considered 'part of the safety system..This is a description error missed-when we rewrote. our license in 1984.

This automatic withdrawal inhibit.has always -been a function' of the l_

control blades, which are part of the Reactor-Safety System.

L

2. Remove the " Pool Water Level" from the list of measuring channels required in section 3.2 Reactor Instrumentation, page IV-17. The pool water level channel is a' float operated device which causes a reactor scram when the pool is below a certain level. Since it is required by Section 3.3 Reactor Safety System, page IV-19, and because it is not a measuring channel, it should. be removed - from this section.

pgp 2gggg gggggg23 gdd/

p PDR I

~.

)

_Y' 1

These' changes l have-been: reviewed by the-Universi.ty. of Lowell-

__ Reactor Ssfety' Subcommittee and th'ey have determ'.ned that these-

~

changes do not ;c_onstitute.a reduction in-reactor ~ safety 'and actually revert to the ' original _-intent _ of these. systems.

Sincerely yours,

['

l i

7,

- Dr,l. Leon Beg ian,.

Assoc;1Vice President.

i for'.' Research q

3 i

1

l o

-~ !

I i

. _,, _ ~.,. _ _.

..~

.