ML20065T570

Forwards Responses to 820809 Questions Re Antitrust Review of Facility.Second 138-kV Transmission Not Completed.City Receives Emergency & short-term Power from Util

ML20065T570
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	10/25/1982
From:	Green T PAINESVILLE, OH
To:	Toalston A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8211020581
Download: ML20065T570 (1)

Text

I b cG+ So-44o l1%'.",""[',u,m Od35V'll2-CITY OF PAINESVILLE 1 ,n t . , , .,,, , s , , s1,, , , .,.

l'AIN i'.SVit.l.E, ()]II() 39,77 TLt.truumE (216l 352-9:pH Y *'

JL 2 m - ulat & & u.,6 /

& . y9te n/

~

?a6:~has2:

tyod

~

5 Y+

i. ) 7to .

Q.) % i lm/ 6v e./CA

'Lv ~ -

. A/ae eAuf bb/ $

1% dsandnovdDa-es, p y a u w ois A w.

pnc4 ~f m aez.

5) hte et b $c 0-n .&b x- S 4

)

M &Y Y' .

^

hDD

1dN Sec ,

$ Aw ( .Lv

, %MU -

ps,a/4 V

hfR 0 0 0 0 PDR

[ 4'f4 6 M

Council-Manager Government

l me-- ,-

. c

\

v 5

i 3

aus s dez Mr. T. Green. Superintendent Painesville Electric Division .

7 Richmond Street Painesville,fhio 44077 ,

Dear rir. Creen:

OPEF.ATI!1G LICENSE AT:TITF.1JST REVIEW C# THE PERRY / DAY!S '! ESSE NUCLEAP PLANTS ,

The htC staff is presently reviewing the application of the Cleveland Electric Illur.inating Company, hereir.after. CEI. (as one'of the co-applicant CAPCO pool mer.bers) for an operating license for Unit 1. f of the Perry #wclear Plant.s The purpose of this review-is to establish whether any significant changes, which have antitrust implicationse have occurred as .a consequence of _CEI's (or other CAPCo merbers') activities since the construction pemit antitrust review was cocoleted in 1977 .

As a seans of assisting in.our analysis 'of significant changes, we would appreciate your response to the following questions: - -

b

1. Has CEI corpleted the second 138 tv transr ission line to the i Painesville electric systen?

(

2. What effect has th'e interconne[ tion or lack of the interconnection with CEI had on the systen planning ,and '

j(

the operation of the Painesville electric systen? . .._.

3

,. - G -

- 3. ,

Whattypeofservice..ifany.istheCityofPainesvil_le(

taking fron CE17 .

4 What effect (or anticipated effect) if any. have the chames ,

in the Easic CAPCO Operating Agreepeat and the discontinuation (

ef joint CAPCD generating units had on the City's planning and ,

systen operation? and. ,._ j

' - -/.._.. <

5. What is your judgment of the viability of the Painesville ,

l electric systen? / -

W  !

l g.:- x /Rt -

pt c' . .

e P,I c c -

- w

,3

, _9 .

s. - ..

- a

$p *

.e-j\

.' :  ?

4 3...

s i

1 2

,1 To assure a tioely review of the captioned operating license application. .i

! - we would apprecir.te your response to this Inouf ry within thirty days.  !

@ Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

j

?d a Sincerely,

$ A.L%han i t Argf1 Toalston, Ehfer 6 -

)'j Antitrust and Economic Analysfs Branch Division of Engineering

!] Office of Muclear Reactor a Regulation l I a  :

,Y si h

b *

?h o,  ;

k g

? .

? i-l qi , ,

r .,

); '

L',

s.- c.

h1 g.

L

,[f .

a

>i.

M

-3 d

H (i,

n.

a k!

bl m

• *k

-A