ML20065T163

Forwards Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program Schedule Status as of 901211 & Updated List of Key Action Plan Info

ML20065T163
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	12/14/1990
From:	Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9012270293
Download: ML20065T163 (14)

Text

. - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ .

s .

' B ALTIMORE i , GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER

• P.O. 00X 1475 o BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 1475 LEON B RUSSELL December 14, 1990 uca,$7.MS.pau.cmaamm US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Document Control Desk

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 Performance Improvement Plan Update Enclosed please find a copy of the Performance Improvement Plan Implementation Program-(PIP-IP) Schedule Status as of December 11, 1990. Also attached is an updated list of key Action Plan information, including verification status and a synopsis of our most recent activities.

Please contact me - (260-6680) or Rich Olson (260-3771) should you aavo any questions.

Sincerely, aS

1. cn 3 /lujt Leon B. Russell ec: Bruce R. Boger US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 14A2 Washington, DC 20555

/ Attachments 9012270293 901214

% l PDR ADOCK 05000317 e g, P PDR

/. v ., u J

i t +

1 December 14, 1990 Page two bec: Messrs. G.C. Creel (w/ synopsis & list)

C.H. Cruse (w/ synopsis & list)

R.E. Denton (w/ synopsis & list)

R.P. Heibel (w/ synopsis & list)

J.R. Lemons (w/ synopsis & list)

D.V. Graf (w/ synopsis & list)

G.L. Detter (w/all)

B.S. Montgomery (w/all)

R.C.L. Olson (w/ synopsis)

R.F. Lewis (w/ synopsis)

J.S. Fuoto (w/ synopsis)

I

l SYNOPSIS OF PIP PROGRESS Period of 30 November - 14 December Imolementation Verification: 12 action plans are verified and-closed. 4 action plans have finished their scheduled tasks and await completion of verification activities. 5 action plans have been verified with open items are pending reverification.

Transition Plannina: Active PIP Action Plans are being integrated with the Nuclear Program Plan. The tracking of progress for these Action Plans and other long term self-assessment and ana-lytical functions of PIP are being assumed by the Management Sys-tems Unit.

t i

CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN l

SCHEDULE STATUS AS OF December 11,1990 '

1 i

l-u i BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY l

ie -4J-a J--r --,hA+--4--4 -- .Mae J--- -- 4_4- ,DJ-- -,J4-w-h --M .- -+aWm- 3a--#4-a- el A+A-+r-h-4 5 * .m- ...A...A..h-% a M aA mp. %s4-a...ha

+ 4 CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES I~

a

}

)

l I

i'. _ e --

I PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS DECEMBER 14, 1990 A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR MILESTONES.

WHERE ACTION PLANS ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE SO IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.

• 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE -114 DAYS

• 4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NEGATIVE -43 DAYS 4.01.0 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING NEGATIVE -8 DAYS 3.06.1 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW NEGATIVE -7 DAYS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE ANALYSES FOR THE DECEMBER 11, 1990 DATA DATE:

• 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM PRITCHETT, TOM -114 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -114 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED '

TO THE REPRIORITIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF A REQUEST BY THE VP-NED TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE HIERARCW2 PROCEDURES IN PLACE BY DECEMBER 31, 1990.

• • RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM (PUP) PLAN IS BEING REVISED TO REFLECT THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT. TARGET FOR APPROVAL BY MR. CREEL IS DECEMBER 14, 1990. COINCIDENT WITH THIS, PIP ACTION PLAN 5.2.1 WILL BE REVISED.

REVISED PROJECT PLAN WILL SHOW SLIP BEYOND THE DECEMBER 31, 1990 END DATE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE PROGRAM PIP ITEMS.

THE SCHEDULE REVIEW MEETING WAS PLANNED FOR DECEMBER 14, 1990 TO REVISE ACTION PLAN 5.02.1 SCHEDULE SO THAT IT COINCIDED WITH REVISION 3 OF THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT PLAN. THIS MEETING HAS NOW BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR 8:30AM ON DECEMBER 17, 1990.

• 4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE -43 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -43 7AYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE EXTENSION OF REVIEW TIME BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE PROBLEM REPORT (PR) FORM, THE IMS ORGANIZATION PLAN, THE REVIEW CRITERIA, THE VERIIFICATIONS AND CLOSURE PROCESS, THE TRAINING SPECIFICATION, AND THE PR ANALYSIS PROCESS. IN ADDITION THE TESTING OF THE PR FORMS BY FUTURE USERS IS TAKING LONGER THAN SCHEDULED. THE PROJECT DID NOT CLARIFY AND ESTABLISH PROPER INTERFACES AMONG IMS, PUP MAINTENANCE, AND QV ON PROCEDURE CHANGES INCLUDING CCI-200, CCI-116, QAP-26, QAP-14 AND OTHERS.

THE SCHEDULE HAS BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT THE CURRENT COMPLETION OF DECEMBER 21, 1990 TO iUOLUDE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW, INCORPORATION OF COKMENTS, REVISED PROCEDGnFC, AND SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL VIA PROPER PROCESSES. ALL PROCEDURE CHANGES MUST BE APPROVED BY FEBRUARY 1, 1991 TO COMMENCE TRAINING.

"*" INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ON CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS REPORT MORE THAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.

l

o T

• • RECOMMENbED CORRECTIVE ACTION'**

PREPAREE AND- SUBMIT A CHANGE REQUEST THAT REFLECT CURRENT GOALS- AND ADJECTIVES: -!

-THE CHANGE REQUEST IS IN THE PIP MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS. )

4.01.0 OPERATING. EXPERIENCE REVIEW PIERINGER, PAUL -8 DAYS

.THIS ACTION PLAN IS -8 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO -!

.THE DEFERRED-ISSURANCE OF CCI-165 AND START OF THE NEAR MISS PILOT ,

PROGRAM BY THE PLANT MANAGER.

THE LARGE NUMBER OF COMMENTS TO BE RESOLVED AND INCORPORATED INTO CCI-165 WILL CONSTITUTE REISSUING THE PROCEDURE TO THE APPROPRIATE -i

, COMMIT 2EES - FOR APPROVAL. THE CURREKr PROJECTED ISSUE DATE FOR CCI-165 1S FEBRUARY 28,1991 AND THE NEAR MISS PROGRAM IS SCHEDULED TO COMMENCE >EARLY IN JANUARY 1991. *

• • -RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

PREPARE AND SUBMIT A CHANGE REQUEST THAT REFLECTS CURRENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. a THE-RESPONSIBLE PLANNER AND. ACTION PLAN-MGR ARE PLANNING TO MAKE THE 1NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS TO PREPARE A CHANGE REQUEST-AND REVISE THE SCHEDULE DURING1THE-WEEK-ENDING DECEMBER 21, 1990.

'3.06.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING DOSWELL, JOE -7 DAYS HTHIS ACTION PLAN IS -7 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE EXTENDED-REVIEW TIME OF THE SIS ORGANIZATIONAL AND STANDARDIZED REPORT-PROPOSALS.

~THE SIF ORGANIZATIONAL PROPOSAL IS,BEING REVIEW BY THE SIS MANAGEMENT STAFF Abu THE STANDARDIZED REPORT PROPOSAL WAS ISSUED TO THE ADVISORY-

= COMMITTEE FOR'THEIR REVIEW'ON DECEMBER 11,-1990 SIX DAYS BEHIND -q SCHEDULE.

THE' CURRENT SCHEEULE' FORECAST COMPLETION DATES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL PLAN l' AND STANDARDIZED REPLRT ARE' JANUARY 25, AND 28, 1991 RESPECTIVELY.-

Jo* RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **

EVERY EFFORT ~SHOULD BE'MADE TO IMPROVE'THE CURRENT COMPLETION DATE.

l l

APPENDIX A EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT LEOEND:

% COMPLETE PIP BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES DIRECFLY RELATED TO COMPLETION OFTIIE ACrlON PLAN OR MILESTONES.

% COMPLETE ALL BASED ON MAN HOURS ASSIGNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES INCLUDINO ONGOINO AS A RESULT OF PIP ACTIVITIES OR MILESTONES.

TOTAL FLOAT THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES REQUIRED TO SUPPORTTHE MILESTONE DATES AND CURRENT STATUS.

NEOATIVE VALUES - INDICATE ONE OR MORE OF THE MILESTONE IS LATE BY THE INDICATED NUMBER OF WORKDAYS.

POSITIVE VALUES - INDICATETHAT ACERTAIN AMOUNTOF SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS BETWEEN THE END OF THE ACTIVITIES AND THE MILESTONE MILESTONES.

ZERO VALUE - INDICATES THE MILESTONES ARE EXACFLY ON SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES MUST BE COMPLETED ON TIME TO KEEP ON SCHEDULE.

IMPLE VERIP COMPLETE "YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLAN.

" REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACFORY RESULTS OFTHE IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED ON THE ACrlON PLAN AND ANOTHER IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION.

"N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED.

f DATA DATE 11DEC90 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN RUN DATE 13DEC90 0939 HRS EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

REPORT ALL IMPLEMENT.

TOTAL  % COMPLETE START FINISH TOTAL MILESTONES VERIFICT*"N ACT PLAN s / TITLE PLAN MANAGER MANHOURS PIP / ALL DATE DATE FLOAT COMPLETE COMPLETE .

MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS ====================================================================================================

2.01.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MARKOWSKI, MIKE 1058 100 109 13JUL89 28AUC90 0 2.02.0 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN DONOHOE, ANN 10050 99 99 12JAN89 14DEC90 0 2.03.0 NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 775 96 95 SJUN89 31DEC90 0 2.05.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MARKC-WSKI, MIKE 2766 100 100 21APR89 SJUN90 0 YES YES 2.05.2 RECULATORY COMMITMENT MNGMNT PROCES MANN, BRIAN 87272 2 2 1 MAR 90 6HOV92 0 2.05.3 PERFORMANCE OSJECTIVE IMPROVEMENTS MARKOMSKI, MIKE N/A 100 100 SJAN90 12APR90 0 YES YES CRCANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS IMPROVEMENTS ===================================================================================r===========

3.02.0 MANACING ORGANIZATIONAL 1 PCM CHANC MARKOWSKI, MIKE 1120 100 100 26JUN89 21SEP90 0 YES 3.03.0 LEADERSHIP CONFERENCES MARKDWSKI, MIKE 516 100 10P 12JUM89 20NOV89 0 YES YES 3.04.0 TEAM WORK s' INTERFACES MARKOWSKI, MIKE 1936 93 's3 20JUL89 28 MAR 91 0 3.05.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC 2610 100 A00 10JUL89 12SEP90 0 3.06.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING DOSWELL, JOE 14529 49 49 10JUL89 27SEP91 -7 3.06.2 MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL HAYDEN, JOHN 4290 100 100 IFEB89 7DEC90 0 YES 3.06.3 OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN THORP, JOHN 12314 53 42 IFEM9 ,,wR93 8 3.07.0 ENGINEERINC PLANNINC MARINARI, DAN 5360 103 100 AtAN89 29JAN90 0 YES YES 3.08.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES DAVIS, STEVE 4099 100 100 28MOV88 9 MAR 90 0 YES YES 3.09.0 QUALITY CIRCLES PROCRAM EDWARDS, ANN 13950 100 45 14MARd9 10JAN92 0 YES LSSESSMENT CAPABILITY IMPROVENINTS =================================================================================================

4.00.0 POEAC PIERINCER, PAUL N/A N/A N/A 31JUL89 31JUL89 0 YES YES 4.01.0 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PIERINGER, PAUL 14086 75 75 15AUG89 29JAN92 -8 4.02.0 QC IMPROVEMENTS ROMNEY, KEN 62280 98 97 IJUN89 21DEC90 0 4.05.0 QA INTERNAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENTS ANUJE, ANA 11496 100 100 18 MAYS 9 2JAN90 0 YES YES 4.04.0 INDEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATION UNIT PIERINGER, PAUL 23552 99 99 15JUN88 26DEC90 0 4.05.0 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE 2484 97 97 SMAY89 28FEB91 0 4.06.0 ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENTS DAVIS, STEVE 25600 100 99 IJUN88 11FEB91 0 YES 4.07.0 POSRC CARROLL, JOHN 1570 99 99 IJUN89 21DEC90 8 4.08.0 OSSRC MIERNIKI, MIKE 1229 106 100 20JAN89 25JAN90 0 YES YES 4.09.0 VISITING OTHER PLANTS CAMPO, CENE 1566 100 100 SJUL89 29JUN90 0 YES YES 4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE 14688 31 31' 1MAY90 19AUG91 -43 ACTIVITY CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS ============================================================= ========================================

S.01.0 AUXILIARY SYSTEMS ENCINEERING UNIT THORNTON, AL N/A N/A N/A SJUL89 5JUL89 0 YES YES 5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROCRAN PRITCHETT, TOM 665985 99 45 1FEB89 31DEC92 -114 5.02.2 SURVEILLANCE TEST PROGRAM DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 9081 99 99 IJUN89 *JAN91 0 5.02.3 POST MAINTENANCE TESTING HAYDEN, JOHN 3988 100 100 IFEB89 130CT89 0 YES YES 5.03.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 40258 99 99 SSEP89 SJAH91 0 5.03.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PLNC SYS BROWN, LARRY 78648 74 59 1 MAR 89 14JUN91 0 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TON 6618 99 99 29FE888 14FEB91 0 5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION PFRKS, PAUL 179352 99 le IMAR88 15JAN98 6 5.03.5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT / DOCUMENT CONTROL VOCEL, ANN 4201 100 100 SFEB90 180CT90 0 YES 5.03.6 INFORMATION RESOURCE MNCHNT PROJECT BARTH, AL 13346 72 72 IFEB90 280CT91 0 5.03.7 DRAWING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM KATZ, PETE 49999 29 29 1 MAR 90 30JUN92 0 5.04.1 SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAININC YCE, JIM 15002 100 100 SMAY89 4JAN90 0 YES YES 5.04.2 MINOR MODIFICATIONS HOLSTON, W 7282 77 77 21AUG89 29JUL91 0 5.04.3 RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE CREENE, KEN 14789 68 69 30SEP88 SDEC91 0 PIP VERIFICATION PROCESSES =============================================================*==========================*================

6.01.0 PIP IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRY 930 41 42 7JUL89 15DEC92 0 6.03.0 PIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRY 6640 51 51 5FEB90 SDEC91 0

. . - . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . . - . . _ . . . . . . . . - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - - _ _ _ _ . - - ~ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ .

TOTALS 1419935 76 49 2*FEB83 31AUG94 -114 17 12

MILESTONE OVERVIEW L

.f

._m

r 1

_ . . ~ , .

- STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 11, 1990- M I L.E.S T O N E OVERVIEW ,

' TOTAL NUMBER" SCHEDULED VS ACTUAL R SCHEDULED 4r ' _...____.....

ACTION PLAN R / D E S C R'I P.T Il0 N' PLAN MANAGER MILESTONES COMPLETE COMPLETE (PREVIOUS 2 WKS) NEXT 2 WKS

, __... . .__..__..____. ..._._._-_ ._ ...___ . - _. . .__..___ . _ _ -_ ..e...._ __.e. ..___e_ __

MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS =====================================================================================**==============,  ;

~2.01 0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.

. .MARKOWSKI, MIKE. 3 3 0 2.02.0 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN DONOHOE, ANN 11 10 1- ,,

2.03.0 NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 6 5 0 2.85.1 COMMITMENT. TRACKING SYSTEM . . MARKOWSKI, MIKE 4 4 COMPLETE 2.05.2 REGULATORY cot 011TMENT tedGMNT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN 15 4 1/1 0  !

2.05.3 ACCOUNTABILITY IMPROVEMENTS MARKOWSKI4 MIKE 2 2 COMPLETE  !

ORGANIZATIONAL' DYNAMICS IMPROVEMENTS ===========================================================================s==================== 7}

3.02.0 MANAGING' ORGANIZATION 1 PCM CHANGE MARKOWSKI, MIKE- '3 3 COMPLETE i 3.03.0 LEADERSHIP 'ONFERENCES: C 'MARKOWSKI, MIKE. 2 2 .

COMPLETE  !

3.04.0 TEAMWORK & INTERFACES MARKOWSKI, MIKE 5 3 0/0 1 3.05.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ZUMWALT, ERIC 9 9 0 3.06.1 SITE. INTEGRATED SCHEDULING DOSWELL-, JOE. 14 -3 0/0 0 3.06.2 MAINTENANCE WORK.CONTFOL ' HAYDEN, JOHN . 4 4 0/1 COMPLETE 3.06.3 OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN THORPi JOHN 5 1 0/0 1 3.07.0 ENGINEERING PLANNING MARINARI, DAN 4 4 COMPLETE 3.08.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES DAVIS, STEVE 6 6 COMPLETE 3.09.0 QUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDWARDS, ANN 8 8 COMPLETE ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTS.==-----e_-- ======== _

7 N/A- POEAC PIERINGER, PAUL 4 4 COMPLETE i 4.01.0 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PIERINGER, PAUL 13 - 1 1/0 1  !

4.02.0 QC IMPROVEMENTS ROMNEY, KEN 7 5 0/0 2

- 4.03.0 QA INTERMAL ASSESSMENT IPPROVEMENTS ANUJE, ANA 9 9 COMPLETE :f 4.04.0 INDEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATION PIERINGFR, PAUL 9 4 0/3 2 "t 4.05.0 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE- 10 8 0/0 a 4.06.0 ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS. DAv1S,. STEVE 5 5 COMPLETE 4.07.0 POSRC' CARROLL, JOHN . 5 4 1/0 1 r r 4.08.0 OSSRC MIERNICKI, MIKE 6 6 CONPLETE .!

4.09.0 VISITING OTHER PL ANTS CAMPO, GENE. 5 5 COMPLETE i{

4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .

DOSWELL, JOE 25 '3 0/0 4 '!

• ACTIVITY CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS ======================================-_----- -_- ===================================================

5.01.0 AUXILIARY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING UNIT TUCKER, LARRY 2 2 COMPLETE i 5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM 'PRITCHETT, TOM 15 12 0/0 0 I 5.02.2 SURVEILLANCE TEST PROGRAM- DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 11 10 0/0 1 }

HAYDEN, JOHN 5.02.3 POST MAINTENANCE TESTING .

4 4 COMPLETE 5.03.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 9 8 0/0 1 ,

5.03.2 EQUIPMENT DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS BROWN, LARRY 18 9 1/1 1 L 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM 10 9 0/0 0 .t

! 5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION - .

PERKS, PAUL. le 7 2/1 0 [

5.03.5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT / DOCUMENT' CONTROL VOGEL, ANN 3 3 COMPLETE f 5.03.6 INFORMATION RESOURCE MNGMNT- PROJECT BARTH, AL ' 4 0 0/0 0

5.03.7 DRAWING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BORDSALL, G. 12 5 0/0 0 -[

i 5.04.1 SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAINING YOE, JIM 4 4 COMPLETE 5,04.2 MINOR MODIFICATIONS . HOLSTON, W. 11 8 0/1 0 5.04.3 RELIABILITY CENTER MAINTENANCE GREENE, KEN 10 5 0/0 0 i

========================================================================================================================---- ;_; ;

l' TOYALS' , .

'321 211 (66%) 6/8 16

==================================================================================_____._e-__============.___-___..-__=======_

-TOTAL VERIF. NUMBER DUE NUMBER  !

ACTION PLAN R / D E S C R I P T I O N SCHEDULED TO START IN COMPLETE i

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - -

(INCL.REVERIF) DECEMBER (ACTION PLANS) i j

PIP VERIFICATION PROCESSES -------------- --------~ --------------

t 6.1.0 IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION OVERVIFW PHIFER, JERRY 44 1 17 -[

6.3.0 PIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRY' 4 0 2 OF.4 SLICE VERIF. COMPLETE Kf i

s

. .;,.%. ..Lm.7~. _

.g _ . , _ ;__,._

I 4

i CHANGE CONTROL OVERVIEW

.?

a STATUS AS.0F. DECEMBER 11,.1990 CN' ANGEL [COflTROL 0VERVIEW >

-TOTAL CHANGE ~ CHANGE REQUESTS CHANGE REQUESTS DISAPPROVED ACTION PLAN W / D E S C R I P T I O N PLAN MANAGER ~ REQUESTS WRITTEN . AWAITING APPROVAL - APPV/ INCORPORATED CHANGE REQUESTS -

'I

________...____ _e...._______A.______ .. ..--

.. MANAGEMENT PROCESS' IMPROVEMENTS . j j 2.01.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MARKOWSKI, MIKE.I 3 0 3 0

( 2.02.0 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN . DONOHOE, ANN . 4 0 4 0 ,

l 2.03.0 HPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 4 0' 4 0

! 2.05.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MARKOWSKI, MIKE .1 0- 'l. 0 ,

2.05.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MNGMNT PROCESS MANN, BRIAN . 4 0 4 0 '

2.85.3 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE IMPROVEMENTS . MARK 0WSKI; MIKE .

1 0 .

1 0 ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS IMPROVEMENTS ====----------- ;;a====e--- ---=================================================== 2-- ~--- -=

3.02:0 MANAGING ORGANIZATION t PGM CHANGE MARK 0WSKI, MIKE o 0 0 0 3.03.0 LEADERSHIP CONFERENCES. MARK 0WSKI, MIKE .1 0 1 0 3.64.0 TEAMWORK 1 INTERFACES- '

fMARK0WSKI, MIKE -2 0 2 0 I 3.05.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT .ZUMWALT, ERIC 3 0 3 0 3.C6.1 SITE. INTEGRATED SCHEDULING DOSWELL, JOE 5 0 5 0 l 3.06.2 MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL- - HAYDEN, JOMM 1 0 '1 0 3.C6.3 OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN THORP,. JOHN 2 0 2 0 3.07.0 ENGINEERING f*LANNING ' MARINARI, DAN 1 0 1 0 3.08.0 SYSTEM CIRCLES DAVIS, STEVE - 0 0 0 e i I

3.09.0 QUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDWARDS, ANN 1 0 1 C ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENTS ================================================================================================

N/A POEAC . .

PIERINGER, PAUL ,0- 0 0 0 4.01.0 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PIERINGER, PAUL 3 0 3 0 4.02.0 QC IMPROVEMENTS . ROMNEY, KEN 5 0 5 0 4.05.0 QA INTERttAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENTS ANUJE, ANA 0 0 0 0 4.04.0 INDEPENDENT SAFETY EVALUATION :PIERINGER, PAUL '2 0 2 0 4.05.0 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE 1 0 1 0 4.06.0 ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS DAVIS, STEVE 1 0 1 0 4.07.0 POSRC- CARROLL,. JOHN 3 0 3 0 4.08.0 OSSRC MIERNICKI, MIKE O O O O 4.09.0 VISITING OTHER PLANTS CAMPO, GENE :3 0 3 0 4.10.0 ISSUES MANACEttENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE 4 0 4 0 r ACTIVITY CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS ======================================================================================== ============ I 5.01.0 AUXILIARY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING UNIT ' TUCKER, LARRY 0 J 0 0 -[

5.02.1 PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM -PRITCHETT, TOM S 0 5 0 5.82.2 SURVEILLANCE TEST PROGRAM 'DUNKERLY, CHARLIE 5 0 5 0 I 5.02.3 POS* MAINTENANCE TESTING HAYDEN, JOHN O O O O 5.05.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 4 0 4 0 '

S.03.2 EQUIPMENT DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS BROWN, LARRY- 6 e 6 0 'i ROV, TOM 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS 1 0 1 0 5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION. PERES, PAUL. 3 0 2 1 1 5.03.5' RECORDS MANAGEMENT / DOCUMENT CONTROL- V0 GEL, ANN 2 0 2 0 5.03.6 INFORMATION RESOURCE MNGMNT PROJECT BARTH, AL 1 0 1 0 '

5.05.7 DRAWING IrtPROVEMENT PROJECT BURDSALL, G. 0 0 0 0 5.54.1 SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAINING YOE, JIM 2 0 2 0 5.04.2 MINOR MODIFICATIONS- HOLSTON, W. 4 0 4 0 3 5.04.3 RELIABILITY CENTER MAINTENANCE GREENE, MEN 4 0 4 0 [

6.01.0 IMPLEMENTATION VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRY 2 0 2 *

_=====================================_==========_========================================_========================.==

TOTALS .

95 0 94 1

-==============================================================================================================-=;________======

I

_m . _ _

_, a_._ _

MASIER LLil Rf. Elj21 ELEi M2 M MAN %tR1 12/13/90 STATUS M1 M Mfd

. Pf!M lif.Li

<v> 2.1 M. Markowski 4479 Performance $tendards

<v> 2.? A. Donohoe 4733 Consunications Plan

<v> 2.J M. Blank 4123 NPP lesues Based Planning

• 2.4 Resource Allocation v/c 2.5.1 M. Markowski 4479 Catet Tracking system 2.5.2 8. Mann 6517 Reg Catet Mgmt Process v/c 2.5.3 H. Markowski 4479 Perform. Object.i mrovements

• 3.1 Organizational i mrovements v/c 3.2 M. Markowski 4479 Managing org & Pgm Change v/c 3.3 M. Markowski 4479 Leadership Conferences 3.4 M. Markowski 4479 Team ork & Interfaces

<v> 3.5 E. Zunwelt 4952 Project Management I mrovements 3.6.1 J. Doswell 3506 tite Integrated scheduling a 3.6.2 J. Hayden 4359 Maintenance Work Control 3.6.3 J. Thorp 4427 operatione improvement Plan v/c 3.7 D. Marinari 3942 Engineering Planning v/c 3.8 s. Davis 4612 system circles a 3.9 A. Edwards 6611 Quality Circles Progran, v 4.1(old) 4.1(new) P. Pieringer 4060 Operating Experience Review 4.2 K. Ronney 4900 gv Imrovements y/c 4.3 A. Anuje 4919 QA Internal Assess I mrovements 4.4 P. Pleringer 4060 Inder. Safety Evat 4.5 R. Waskey 4160 Safety Assessment a 4.6 S. Davis 4612 Root Cause Analysis

<v> 4.7 J. Carrott 4103 POSRC v/c 4.8 M. Hiernicki # OS$RC (#159 5450) v/c 4.9 G. Camo 4340 visiting other Plants 4.10 J. Doswell 3506 issues Mgmt System v/c 5.1 L. Tucker 4724 Aux Sys Eng Unit 5.2.1 T. Pritchett 4968 Procedures Upgrade Program 5.2.2 c. Dunkerly 4854 surveittence Test Program v/c 5.2.3 J. Hayden- 4359 Post Maintenance Testing 5.3.1 K. Cellers 4828 Procurement Prograni .'roject 5.3.2 L. Brown 4387 ETD/MPS 5.3.3 G. Roy 3612 Technical Manual I mrovements 5.3.4 P. Perks 3611 Design Basis Consolidation a 5.3.5 A. Voget 4481 Records Management /cocument control 5.3.6 A. Barth 370Z InformationResourcesMgmtProject 5.3.7 P. Katz 2115 Orawing Improvement Program v/c 5.4.1 J. Yoe 44V9 System Engineer ireining 5.4.2 W. Holston 4466 Minor Modifications 5.4.3 K. Greers 4385 Reliability centered Maintenance c= Closed by PIRP. <vis I mlementation verification with open item (s),

as All scheduled activities complete, but not verified.

V= I mlementation Verification done. *e Not an " Action Plan," per se.

I l

_ _ _ - _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ ___ _ - _