ML20065R581
| ML20065R581 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1982 |
| From: | Brandenburg B, Morgan C CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC., MORGAN ASSOCIATES, POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| To: | Gleason J, Paris O, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8210290271 | |
| Download: ML20065R581 (2) | |
Text
...
't POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
,OCMCTED
- USNR'-
CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
4 IRVING PLACE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10003
'82 OCT 28 mg c October 27, 1982
'.- ~3ECRt A3,y
' Gi:3 & SERvlCE BRANCH James P.
Gleason Esq., Chairman.
Dr. Oscar H. Paris Administrative Judge Administrative Judge 513 Gilmoure Drive Atomic Safety and Silver Springs, Maryland 20901 Licensing Board U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Mr. Frederick J.
Shon Commission Administrative Judge Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 In the Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of liew York (Indian Point, Unit 2)
Power Authority of the State of New York (Indian Point,' Unit 3)
Docket Nos. 50-247-SP and 50-286-SP
Dear Administrative Judges:
On October 1, 1982, this Board issued its
" Memorandum and Order" (October 1 Order) reformulating conten-tions in the captioned proceeding.
The Board invited all parties to file responses to the Order on or before October 15, 1982,
- which deadline was subsequently extended until l
October 19, 1982**.
The Licensees are in receipt of the following pleadings filed by intervenors and interested par-ticipants in response to the October 1 Order:
l l
(1)
" West Branch Conservation Association's l
Reply to Memorandum and Order of October 1, l
1982," dated October 13, 1982.
1 l
(2)
"New York City Council Member Motion in l
Response to ASLB Memorandum and Order (October 1, l
1982)", dated October 13, 1982.
l l
October 1 Order at p.40 l
,See Mailgram from the Eoard to the parties dated l
l October 14, 1982 8210290271 821027 l
PDR ADOCK 05000247 G
PDF Dsos
i' i
Administrative Judges October 27, 1982 Page 2 (3)
" Parents Concerned About Indian Point -
Pre-Hearing Motion," dated October 15, 1982.
(4)
"Intervenors' Response to ASLB Memorandum and Order of October 1, 1982," dated October 19, 1982.
(5)
"Rockland County Motion In Response to Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Memorandum and Order
- 1982,". dated October 19, 1982.
(6)
"Westchester County Executive Motion In Response to ASLB Memorandum And Order (October 1, 1982)",
dated October 19, 1982.
While the pleadings.of the New York City Council members, Parents, Rockland County and Westchester County are nominally styled as " motions", they in fact comment upon and take issue with certain provisions of the October 1 Order, primarily regarding the scheduling of emergency planning issues.
Treating-these responses strictly as motions, however, would mean that responses would be due as early as October 28.
The principal purpose of the pre-hearing conference to be held on November 3-4 is to discuss the positions of the parties on the October 1 Order, and to schedule further pre-hearing and hearing matters in this case.
Since the previously filed " motions" all deal with these same issues, the Licensees submit that efficiency and good order would be served if the positions of all parties respecting the October 1 Order were aired at the pre-hearing conference, rather than in discrete filings responding to separate motions.
Therefore, absent objection from the B,oard, the Licensees will plan to orally address all matters raised by the various responses and motions relating to the October 1 Order at the upcoming pre-hearing conference.
Sincerely, Brent L.
Brandenburg Charles Morgan, Jr.
Counsel for Consolidated Edison Counsel for Power Authority Co. of New York, Inc.
of the State of New York BLB:erf cc:- Service List (express mail)