ML20065L803
| ML20065L803 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1990 |
| From: | Russell L BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9012100107 | |
| Download: ML20065L803 (13) | |
Text
.
to BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER
- P.O. BOX 1475
PLANNSIG DEPARTMENT November 30,1990 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention:
Document Control Desk
Subject:
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos. I and 2, Docket Nos. 50 317 and 50-318 Performance impro/cment Plan Update.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Performance improvement Plan Implementation Program (PIP.
IP) Schedule Status as of November -27,1990. To date,13' Ac'. ion Plans have been verilled as implemented. Of these,lthe original Action Plan 4.1 (Plant Operating Experience Assessment Committee) was verified and further expanded into new Action Plan 4.1 (Operating Experience
~
. Review). The remaining 12 Action Plans were closed by the Performance Improvement Review Panel, as discussed in the' attached synopsis; of our most recent activities. Eight Action Plans are i
pending completion of verification, and 20 Action Plans remain active.
- Attached in addition to the synopsis,is an updated list of key Action Plan information, including verificmion and completion status.
Please contact me (260-6680) or Rich Olson (260-377!) shAuld you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~vg nGe N ?untll Leon B. Russell i.
E Attachments cc:
Mr. Bruce R. Boger US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 14A2 Washington, DC 20555 1
i.
j
(
\\ \\ \\t 9012100107 901130
\\
PDR ADOCK OS000317 p
FDC
~
~
.k "'
- r--
- -.1 !. o,.' JO,,.
I i
, n.qp s.,
w
+
- fiF,
se.
.r
- -Document Control Desk November 30,1990 =
t 1
, Page'2.-
q 4
1
-Messrs.
G. C. Creel (w/ synopsis & list) i 7bec:
l C. H. Cruse (w/ synopsis & list)-
T
. R. E. Denton (w/ synopsis & list)
D. V. Graf (w/ synopsis & list)-
R. P. Heibel '
(w/ synopsis & list) s un J. R. Lemons -
(w/ synopsis & list)
G. L Detter
.(w/all) o B. S. Montgomery.
(w/all) y R. C. L Olson -
(w/ synopsis)
L R. F. Lewis (w/ synopsis) 4
' J. S. Fuoto.
(w/ synopsis) -
vo d
ISI c,
a b 'I'
.,j h [. -
4
, )
n o
nw
^
M m ' :r 9;.,
t
, MJ
. -r w
/ l'
,e h
?.I, t
)
d.h E. r, ?
(jI,
, }! k t.
,.y,
- ,\\3,
- -q 9
s a
t g
'{
i i
.. c,.a i,,h '-'
I
. 5 s
r f
W
,4*
') ;
- l'
[
.1 b,
w i
M s
+1
- s n
l
- a..
-.w t
b
~ _ _.,..
I SYNOPSIS Ol'l IP PROGRESS For the period November 15 November 29,1990 Implementation Wrification:
The schedules for Action Plans 2.1. 3.5, 3.9, 4.6, and 5.3.5 show all activities complete and im plementation verification is in process. Action Plans 2.2,2.3, and 4.7 have had implerantation verification 'eports issued and each has one open item to be addressed for close out.
Effectiveness Verification:
The report of the second effectiveness verification, which covered self assessment and events analysis functions, was issued to BO&E November 5,1990. Working responses to the recommendations and significant observations have been prepared and are pending management review and approval.
Performance Improvement Review Panel (PIRP):
The PIRP met on November 21,1990. The PIRP, consisting of the NED managers and chaired by the VP NED, was established to review PIP Action Plan results.
Twelve (12) Action Plans were reviewed at this meeting, and all 12 were closed, with some follow up action proposed in several areas. The date for the next PIRP meeting has not been set.
i f.
4' I
e.
CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 4
PERFORMANCEIMPROVEMENT PLAN SCHEDULE STATUS AS OF November 27,1990 1
l BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY L
L
CRITICAL PATH ANALYSES l
l l
)
1
s PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 30, 1990 A CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED FOR ALL ACTION PLANS TdAT HAVE TOTAL FLOAT VALUES LESS THAN ZERO ON THEIR MILESTONES.
WHERE ACTION PLAi4S ARE TIED TOGETHER CAUSING MULTIPLE ACTION PLAN NEGATIVITY, IT WILL BE SO IDENTIFIED IN THE TEXT OF THE ANALYSIS.
- 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM NEGATIVE -114 DAYS
- 4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NEGATIVE
-43 DAYS
- 5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION NEGATIVE
~42 DAYS
- 5.03.3 TECHNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS NEGATIVE
-41 DAYS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE ANALYSES FOR THE NOVEMBER 27, 1990 DATA DATE:
o 5.02.1 PROCEDURES UPGRADE PROGRAM PRITCHETT, TOM
-114 DAYS l
THIS ACTION PLAN IS -114 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE REPRIORITIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF A REQUEST BY THE VP-NED TO HAVE THE ADMINISTRATIVE HIERARCHY PROCEDURES IN PLACE BY DECEMBER 31, 1990.
0* RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
THE PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROGRAM (PUP) PLAN IS BEING REVISED TO REFLECT THE l
CURRENT STATUS OF THE PROJECT. TARGET FOR APPROVAL BY MR. CREEL IS DECEMBER 14, 1990. COINCIDENT WITH THIS, PIP ACTION PLAN 5.2.1 WILL BE RF, VISED.
l l
REVISED PROJECT PLAN WILL SHOW SLIP BEYOND THE DECEMBER 31, 1990 END DATE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE PROGRAM PIP ITEMS.
SCHEDULE REVIEW MEETING HAS BEEN PLANNED FOR WEEK ENDING DECEMBER 14, t
1990 TO REVISE TEIS ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE TO COINCIDE WITH REVISION 3 OF THE PROCEDURG UPGRADE PROJECT PLAN.
c 4.10.0 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE
-43 DAYS L
THIS ACTION PLAN IS ~43 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE EXTENSION OF REVIEW TIME BY THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE PROBLEM REPORT (PR) FORM, THE IMS ORGANIZATION PLAN, THE REVIEW CRITERIA, THE VERIIFICATIONS AND CLOSURE PROCESS, THE TRAINING SPECIFICATION, AND THE l
PR ANALYSIS PROCESS. IN ADDITION THE TESTING OF THE PR FORMS BY FUTURE l
. USERS IS TAKING LONGER THAN SCHEDULED. THE PROJECT DID NOT CLARIFY AND ESTABLISH PROPER INTERFACES AMONG IMS, PUP MAINTENANCE, AND OV ON i
' PROCEDURE CHANGES INCLUDING CCI-200, CCI-116, QAP-26, QAP-14 AND OTHERS.
THE SCHEDULE HAS BEEN REVISED TO REFLECT THE CURRENT COMPLETION OF DECEMBER 21, 1990 TO INCLUDE ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW, INCORPORATION OF COMMENTS, REVISED PROCEDURES, AND SUBMITTAL OF PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL VIA PROPER PROCESSES. ALL PROCEDURE CHANGES MUST BE APPROVED BY FEBRUARY 1, 1991 TO COMMENCE TRAINING.
INDICATES ACTION PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN ON CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS i
REPORT MORE TRAN ONE UPDATE CYCLE.
0*
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
PREPARE AND SUBMIT A CHANGE REQUEST THAT REFLECT CURRENT GOALS AND ADJECTIVES :
A REVISED SCHEDULE AND CHANGE REQUEST HAS BEEN PREPARE FOR THE ACTION PLAN MANAGER'S APPROVAL. THE ISSUES MANAGEMENT STAFF IS EXPECTED TO COMPLETE THEIR REVIEW DURING THE WEEK OF DECEMETR 7, 1990.
0 5.03.4 DESIGN BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL
-42 DAYS THIS ACTION PLAN IS -42 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE PREPONDERANT NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO TASK 7 " DETAIL TASK CONTINUATION SCHEDULE" h'HICH WAS TO BE
- APPROVED BY OCTOBER 1, 1990, ALONG WITH TASK 3 " STAFFING" AND TASK 5 "HVAC SYSTEM EFFORTS".
TASK 5: RVAC AND AIR HANDLING CONTACT WAS AWARDED ON NOVEMBER 9, 1990.
TASK 7: THE TASK CONTINUATION SCHEDULE WAS APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 30, 1990.
0*
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
TASK 3: CONTINUE TO EXPRESS THE URGENCY FOR QUALIFIED CANIDATES:
PREPARE AND SUBMIT A CHANGE REQUEST TO REBASELINE THE SCHEDULE BASED UPON TASK 5: THE AWARD OF HVAC AND AIR HANDLING CONTACT, TASK 7:
APPROVED CONTINUTION SCHEDULE AND REVISE TASK 3: THE SCHEDULE COMPLETION OF THE STAFFING PLAN TO CURRENT PROJECTION.
PLANNING AND THE ACTION PLAN MANAGER HAS SCHEDULED A MEETING FOR 8:00 AM ON DECEMBER 3, 1990 TO IMPLEMENT THE ABOVE RECOMMENDATIONS.
l 1
1.
1.
THIS ACTION PLAN IS -41 DAYS NEGATIVE. THE NEGATIVITY IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE CONTINUOUS DELAY IN THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS. COMMENTS WERE NOT RECIEVED AS SCHEDULED FROM DESIGN ENGINEERING.
c* RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION **
i l
A CHANGE REQUEST HAS BEEN INITIATED TO REBASELINE THIS ACTION PLAN.
l l
APPENDIX A EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
REPORT LEGEND:
rc COhtPLETE PIP BASED ON h!AN HOURS ASSIGNED TO ALL ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY RELATED TO COh!PLETION OF THE ACTION PLAN OR hilLESTONES.
We COhtPLETE ALL BASED ON h!AN. HOURS ASSIONED TO ALL ACTIVITIES INCLUDING ONGOING AS A RESULT OF PIP ACTIVITIES OR hilLESTONES.
TOTAL FLOAT THE DIFFERENCE IN WORKDAYS BETWEEN ACTIVITY DATES REQUIRED TO SUPPORTTHE hilLESTONE DATES AND CURRENT STATUS.
NEGATIVE VALUES -
INDICATE ONE OR h1 ORE OFTHE hilLESTONE IS LATE BY THE INDICATED NUhtBER OF WORKDAYS.
POSITIVE VALUES -
INDICATE THAT A CERTAIN AhtOUNT OF SLACK (FLOAT) EXISTS BETWEEN THE END OFTHE ACTIVITIES AND THE hilLESTONE h!!LESTONES.
ZERO VALUE -
INDICATES THE h!!LESTONES ARE EXACTLY ON SCHEDULE AND ACTIVITIES h!UST BE COh!PLETED ON T!htE TO KEEP ON SCHEDULE, lh!PLE VERIF COhtPLETE "YES" INDICATES SATISFACTORY l
COh!PLETION OF THE Ih!PLEhtENTATION VERIFICATION AND THE ACTION PLe',
REVERIFY" INDICATES UNSATISFACTORY RESULTS OFTHE lh!PLEhtENTATION VERIFICATION AND WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL WORK TO BE PERFORh!ED ON THE ACTION PLAN AND ANOTHER l
th!PLEh!ENTATION VERIFICATION.
'N/A" INDICATES NOT APPLICABLE AS NO IhtPLEh!ENTATION VERIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
.,e y.
- f.
- t DATA DATE 27NOV99 PERf 0RMANCE IMPROVEMENT PL AN RUN DATE 29NOV99 9737 HRS ENECUTIVE
SUMMARY
REPORT ALL IMPLEMENT.
TOTAL Z COMPLETE START FINISH TOTAL MILESTONES VERIFICT"N ACT PLAN e
/
TITLE PLAN MANAGER MANNOURS FIP / ALL DATE DATE FLOAT COMPLETE COMPLETE MANAGEMENT PROCESS IMPRO'EMENTS====================================================================================================
2.C1.9 PERFORMANCE STANOARDS MARKOWSKI, MIKE 1958 ISO 199 13JUL89 28AUG99 9
VES 2.C2.9 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN DONOHOE, AMN 19950 99 99 12JAN89 14DEC99 9
2.G3.9 NPP ISSUES BASED PLANNING TIETJEN, KEN 775 95 95 SJUN89 31DEC99 9
2.C5.1 COMMITMENT TRACKING SYSTEM MA*KOWSKI, MIKE 27 %
199 ISO 21APW89 SJUN99 9
VES VES 2.C5.2 REGULATORY COMMITMENT MNGMNT PROCES MANN, BRI AN 87272 2
2 1 MAR *9 6MOV92 7
2.C5.3 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE TMPROVEMENTS MARROWSKI, MIKE N/A 100 109 SJAN99 12APR99 9
VES VES ORG AN IZ A T I ON AL D YNAMI CS IMPROVE ME N T S = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = === = = = === = = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === = = = = = = = = = =
3.C2.9 MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL 9 PGM CHANG MARROWSKI, MIKE 1129 199 199 26JUN89 21SEP99 9
VES 3.C3.9 LE ADER$ NIP CONFERENCES MARROWSKI, MIKE 516 109 199 12JUN89 29NOV89 9
VES VES 3.94.9 TEAM WORK & INTERF ACES MARROWSKI, MIKE 1936 92 92 29JUL89 28 MAR 91 9
3.C5.9 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2UMWALT, ERIC 2619 ISO 199 19JUL89 12SEP99 9
VES 3.e6.1 SITE INTEGRATED SCHEDULING DOSWELL, JOE 14529 47 47 19JUL89 13SE P91 0
3.06.2 MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL HAYDEN, JOMM 4299 94 96 IFEB89 31DEC99 9
3.06.3 OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN THORP, JOMM 123 3 47 38 IFE889 7APR93 0
3.C7.9 ENGINEERING PLANNING MARIMARI, DAN 5369 ISO ISO 3JAN89 29JAN99 9
VES VES 3.08.9 SYSTEM CIRCLES DAVIS, STEVE 4999 189 199 28MOV88 9 MAR *9 9
VES VES 3.89.9 QUALITY CIRCLES PROGRAM EDWARDS, ANN 13959 100 43 14 MAR 89 2JAN92 9
VES ASSESSMENT CAPABILITV IMPRO*tEMENTS=================================================================================================
4.CO.9 POEAC PIERINGER, PAUL N/A N/A N/A 31JUL89 31 JUTS 9 9
YES VES 4.C1.9 OPERATING EXPERIENCE REVIEW PIERINGER, PAUL 14986 74 74 15AUG89 29JAN92 9
4.C2.9 QC IMPROVEMENTS ROMMEY, KEN e2289 96 94 1JUN89 21DE C99 9
4.93.9 QA INTERNAL ASSESSMENT IMPROVEMENTS ANUJE, AMA 11490 109 199 18MAY89 2JAN99 9
VES VES 4.94.0 INDEPENDENT SAFElf EVALUATION UNIT FIERINGER, PAUL 23552 97 95 15JUN88 28DEC99 9
4.05.9 SAFETY ASSESSMENT KATZ, PETE 2484 97 97 8MAV89 28F E B91 9
4.06.9 ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS IMPROVEMENTS DAVIS, STEVE 25699 199 199 IJUN88 11FEB91 9
VES 4.GT.9 POSRC CARROtt, JOHN 1579 99 99
$JUN89 29NOV99 8
4.03.9 CSSRC MIERNIKI, MIKE 1229 199 100 *9JAN89 25JAN99 9
VES VES 4.09.9 VISITING OTHER PLANTS CAMPO, GENE 1566 199 199 3JUL89 29JUN99 9
VES VES 4.10.9 ISSUES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOSWELL, JOE 14688 27 27 1MAY99 1**;91 45 ACTIVITY CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS====================================================e==--
..=========================================
5.91.9 AUXILI ARY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING UNIT THORNTON, AL N/A N/A N/#
6JUL89 SJLt89 9
YES VES 5.92.1 PROCEDURE t'PGRADE PROGRAM PRITCHETT, TON M5983 99 84 1FEB89 31DEC92
-114 5.C2.2 SURVEILLANCE TEST PROGRAM DUNKERLV, CHARLIE 9981 98 98 IJUN89 9JAN91 9
5.02.3 POST MAINTENANCE TESTING HAYDEN, JOHN 3988 199 ISO IFEB89 130CT89 9
VES VES 5.93.1 PROCUREMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CELLARS, KEVIN 49258 99 99 SSEP89 8JAN91 8
5.03.2 EQUIP TECH DATABASE /MAINT PLNG SYS BROWN, LARWV 78M8 71 57 1 MAR 89 14JUN91 9
5.G3.3 TECNNICAL MANUAL IMPROVEMENTS ROY, TOM h18 99 99 29FEB88 21DEC99
-41 5.C3.4 DESICW BASIS CONSOLIDATION PERKS, PAUL 179352 99 19 IMAR88 31AUG94
-42 5.C3.5 RECORDS MANAGEMENT / DOCUMENT CONTROL VOGEL, ANN 4291 199 199 SFE899 180CT99 9
VES 5.03.6 INFORMATION RESOURCE MNGMNT PROJECT BARTH, AL 13346 71 71 IFEB99 70CT91 6
5.C3.7 DRAWING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM KAT2, PETE 49999 27 27 1 MAR 99 39JUN92 9
5.94.1 SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAINING VOE, JIM 13992 199 199 5MAY89 4JAN99 9
VES VES 5.04.2 MINOR MODIFICATIONS HOLSTON, W 7282 77 77 21AUG89 29JUL91 9
5.94.3 RELI ABILITY CENTERED MANsEMANCE GREENE, KEN 14789 68 68 30SEP88 SDEC91 9
FIP VERIFICATION PROCESSES=========================================================================================================
f,.C1.0 PIP IMPLEMENTATICW VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRY 939 37 38 7JUL89 15DE C92 9
6.93.9 FIP EFFECTIVENESS VERIFICATION PHIFER, JERRY use 51 51 5FE899 19MOV91 0
T3fALS 1419935 75 47 29F E B88 31AUG94
-114
- 8 12 1
4 I
b MILESTONE OVERVIEW l
l I
l
o.,. :
w w
e:ee r
==e:
e
- == : :
e
=
I;v::e g
.w w w., w w w www.w w
w ww
.w w
w w
i,!!!"f-[:if f-I "fllil-f"f-II !!"f -~~f"["!-!
y o.
I !l ll l
l ll ll 0
Wut:
ll g
~
=
-oi.
W8l ll 9
.. ll. ll. * :
B gE ll ll ll
- Ul.u s s ll s ll *g g E l -
ss ss s s:
W l ll s :
s sss ss ssss ss eu:
n=!!
s si
- l
- Mr *U :: :ll l
ll ll ll ll w
8 2 l ll $ 5 :
" ' ll ll l
"M!
>*w.:
l: l ll l
!l ll ll * ::. E : u,
}.~Gg wggjjn.nnu nunenn-<
.. m e..n e in n u u. #.. e e n. in, s.n
- ' ll ll ll ll ll a
ll ll ll l
l l
w ll l
ll l hor o <s E l ll l
ll ll ll ll *
- 5
-."n inn.,nuine<<in
<nsee.inineninauin
<e...n<ne W$
l,,,
i
-gg :
g u
gg,I";<
g
- d l 1; ll ll ll ll : N W l w
r..
u o
o l ll ll l
ll ll ll * ::: ;
a
- ll ll ll ll ll ll w
~
w w
www w
!l w:
ll :
M 5:255u 5
l,E 5
ll ll r
3 d
. = ll ll sq* g:lt"5sta gim.=== :
ww v i :.: *
- a r i: : a a a
- g I I r. W i ll ' *, * *-
5 l ll
- i E 5 5 5 : 555t 8
a I~V,.5"are a! ::a.8*:E ** 5,Ew.:
e*:cer
.Vra.:e ::.-:.2.-...
l:
en.g:nxxa..
s
.W.3
.g.
[ggs z..g zgi,n::!!.!.[rige<:srwraefug..:sE:e=n.=c.==.<g:sr[x:
a.
g.
.a 5 :
- e. age 5.. rg:.. gr::
r:re*
.l:, =a,rm:
..w:
w.:
c.E.
el.::g H
3 I*
n.
H M
ll ll ll W ll E
ll t e
-W 8 i, y I
5 a
l gg l
t :g E
"E VC " * -
W ll ll *:
IE a
ut*g* C i:
- ! g:
CEg y I
=
- s E
W 5
- E"5 5
W E
~3 "l"
2: "r
-lta,
E.Er r,i, Eat g ! 5f:.
- f. 5:
"C E
f<
- : 0 0 *i., -
. s-
.., ie g g w.,
w t d r t.h, W ;. 5:
fra"
" Et'd.5ft
~!,r 5tt*
W E*,
a t
WO E I
- 00EC tEEME3w"Ws E" B E " g * !!
-<w
.e-*
r "l**
a *:
"!$Ee"W W I *. *f v 3. g y lu v l.l ogM5.E>dyI*so*E *ted" 5
E C**45 l
.E2 O
y w r *a $ *! E
- s 0 2 g g R E :
"t n*Ei
" I.
8-~<
-y ws>
5 8Edi
- ', ll ll wlgg*
o
<a o
=
3ka
" w * * " *: E
~inw"g Ors 0*
i i Y : " E
- E..E g ". " i B W f ~ g W :: v ag$*s v.g s -r <. - wg.
- w 5",
ll olg-<=
,h
. ~o Cd.
R 5, a:
WE"gr E
'.!.g m
<m uu e.08dE"EMr$*Ergogg-m<a E:
rt C 055:fw f Ow,0
. W55lo 4"gsog y
.- E.
E a
g-sww ll m: 5t*
<u.
z-g8vEi.go25"jui"O***gt* c 8 E M " S 8 0 E w : E W E E E E E ll 5 l l:' k
--s EtukviW"15 EMibwASE2b8a 3!nnar5Ugn*8svGv !Gftl
't z:
E j
e lE...
una....
un...g
..c......
0.
un-un<in
- unlle" E*'
8 ElddddddiEddiJidi.:diu
- A d i d i.
- i i d C.; d a d i d d a d i d ii d : d l; Els**
- : 1 *. *
- 9 *.
- f n n n..* 9 9 * * * *. * *. 9 *. M
- 9 9 *. *. * *. * *. *. ': *. 9 *. * *. 9 9 " *. *. ". ". 9
- v,<uuuuuu e n n e n n m o x < < < < < < < < < < v in in in in in in in in in in in in in in - a ui o
o
<i
CHANGE CONTROL OVERVIEW I
6 l
w.
n a
a u
eM:
w:
IW;:
8 l
as:
Esl l
l 5l oe u
a u
u u
er 1E:
r3l me,-<- ".-umm-u-. :.nm.u--c.nn".ac.
..-u-.ueW o*!
ll l
l ll l
2 ab:i; ll ll ll o
x, ll ll ll 5l l
l l
ll ll xoit n##-<
. - u m m - u -. :. m m. u -- n. n n u. a m. < 4. u n -. n e e u ' u n J
v"nl 1:
vu*
l
.Eg ll l
ll ll l
I' w
w:www a
ll j
ll ll w
w gg E
ll > E. m ll w
n 2 Ell2:5o y
cernerIa*y%:: E
- 5 l B y g i
. = z E !l
- i3*
8
"**E a--asa:aaagI.Wl:: 'W d
ll z..
o sl
- a a tags:rmsl n-[ssg: shg_es.g -:e.!:5 f."gE'**en w"
lll EwiEM:
Me II'IJJ ta'"gg *graJ5'J:
! nal:--.r:astsa:!Igee,.:e'gHist:
E:
=-
=
a
..re:
ag.gr
.n rnc.:E,:
tl-n :n.n:nna asw: ct en:
e
{0 w
vn:n
=
tr:n E
- 5 e
-w g
IE lv se "b l
a u
W Eg
,s
- s ut" s s -[:
"!si !ag *
- O,!,s ;s ::
nE"
=
a r
ve r
ge su r n
E ':e-l g g l a m r a.,
e-- -e g g, 8
g v
=e eeen nn
. s a::
,g v K, e
=W w
- .seur:
- lge.=y-!u"wl-a: alx5g8 ggeselig.,e-enigs r s e g w n ':1., s sa -
e e r,g n,.s : -,[ n,- !,r,:
r a=
i
= ets e
r :: vls,osa s
r,:s :
asw b < a.,
xmg:
n -:.ge.,- -IIossa eg sts ssytr 5stsw va ss a ves===s5
!a:lsarnun==-!g::n:.,faeng
- Eggg:gw,slesseaumvingts
- a: e.s
==.
I s:
s:,,, glg,g1::wws:!: ::sv:,r-sse-p:rewgs lsey=se:
r 8
s 1
3 o,w
.w gentwes mtg.v 8.paea!ngs-eaer e._et:
--ve-s,,.
gmw s. a o
m:
e : ! t
- t 9 " a * ":
- t 9 " a 9 5 ":
gl2:2002:s2:1 23 23:e. :: ::::::E 222:2000 aggg :::
9 9 ": t t - 9 9 9 0. 9 9 9 9 9 a * *
- 9 9 9 a t : e :
g g Q *adadAdgidididdAddyxiiiiiiiiiigiddiiiiiiiiiiii'8:
g a
.