ML20065J669
| ML20065J669 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1990 |
| From: | Hairston W ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9011140101 | |
| Download: ML20065J669 (4) | |
Text
,.
]
a:
e-u
" Alabama Power Company
. t.
40 inverness C;ntit Parkway'-
Post Offee Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Telephone 205 866 5501 1
I Il
.]
W. Q. Heirston, til i!
Senior Vee Presicent AlabamaPower Nuclear Operations August 22, 1990-
' thesouthemetresysem <
10CFR26. 71'-
z)
CORRDCTED COPI i1
)
.i l
Docket Nos. 50:348 50-~364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission-ATTN Document Control-Desk d
Vashington, D. C.
20555
<1 Gentlemen:
J. M. Farley Nuclear Planti-.-Units 1 and.' 2:
Fitness For Duty Performance Data:
1 Alabama Power Company-hereby submits F1tness-For Duty Performance 1 Data-for
.the first six month reporting period as required'by 10CFR26'.71(d).
This.
data is summarized on the attached enclosure.-
If there are any-'q'estions,-please advise.
u t
Respectfully _ submitte'd',-
ALABAMA' POWER COMPANY; i
dW H
l-V.--G.~Hairston, III VGH,III/RSF/sej8-2939
. Enclosures y
f.l cc:
Mr.'S. D. Ebneter j
Mr. S.-T. Hoffman Hr. G. F. Maxwell j
M p
950h22 af '
9011140101 PDR ADOCK 05000348
,i
( el l R
PDC 1h
=
.'I
~. -....
Rt J.c<d daue P
u.
Performance Data-Personnel Subjectto CFR26.
1
- t Alabama Power Company 06-30-90 o0werr e was som Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant-l R. S. Fucich (205) 868-5051 i
comcf MWE POE UNCWDE WEA Co04 OUTOFFS: SCREEN / CONFIRMATION (ng/ml)
APPENDIX ATO 10CFR 26 1
- Barbituratea 300.300 MARUUANA
/
AMPHETAMINES -
.' /
7
-q Benzodiazepines :300 '150.
.t COCAINE
/
PHENCYCUDINE
/
j OPIATES
/
ALCOHOL (% BAC) -
J/ -
3
- LONG-TERM
. SHORTTERM CONTRACTOR -
CONTRACTOR TESTING RESULTS LICENSEE EMPLOYEES PERSONNEL.
' PERSONNEL
]
AVERAGE NUMBER 977 380 127' WITH UNESCORTED ACCESS 3
REFERRED
. ACCESS 1
CATEGORIES TESTED POSITIVE
.TO EAP-RESTORED TESTED POSITIVE:
TESTED POSITIVE A
PRE EMPLOYMENT
~
q PRE BADGING 63 0
a 66' 0
135-1 PERIODIC l '-
FOR CAUSE 5
-1.
0
'0 -
0 0--
-i POST ACCIDENT i
'l RANDOM 516 1
255 1
'17 :
0 j
FOLLOW-UP 4
1
'O O
O' 0
OTHER TOTAL 588 3
2 1
'321
,.1 152 1
l 1
6/7/89 f
2 o
4
-y e
d
- + ~. -
w i-e,e-,wew--
,,e
R w ise.d g b & 9 0
' ~
4, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS INDMDUALS TESTED -
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
- POSmVE 2
/
4 NEGATIVE 788 0.25
% POSmVE i
GRAPH OF 5
% POSmVE 4
3 2
1 j
ar CONRRMED POSiftVI TESTS FOR SPECIMC SUBSTANCES J
MARUVANA 2
C0CAlNE 2
OPIATES l
AMPHUAMINES l
PHENCYCLIDINE ALCOHOL 1
6/7/89~
4 9
,s e
.--.-.--.e.,
w w
w v.
i U
1 J.-M.-FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM The data generated under the Fitness For Duty program from January, 1990-I through June, 1990 has been revieved and analyzed and no weaknessesLvere f
identified.
No events reportable.under 10CFR26.73 occurred during:this period; however, a letter was submitted to the Commission on May 25,,1990 reporting a false negative, as required by Appendix A - paragraph 2.8..
- 1 The random pool'contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but also those employees who say,.ta an emergency condition, be called upon to i
vork at'the site and may require unescorted access... Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool'while=on site. Testing is-performed on a nominal veekly basis at a rate which will equal.100% oftthe-total population.
J In summarizing management-actions associated vith the F1tness-For: Duty program, it should'be emphasized.that the incidence of confirmed positivel tests has been extremely lov. Consequently, management action's_ relative to determination of. fitness for duty have been limited lto the'few confirmed cositive test results-identified by the program on regular: full-time e.nployees.
Contractor employees screenedLas, positive are denied ~ access land no further action is taken by Alabama Power Company in theseLeases.-
Management.actionsduringthe-reportingperiodLhave.involvedthree personnel, none of which was a~ supervisor or.an-_ individual lice..;.d to-operate the reactor. One employee, who tested positive for drugs"on a-random test was suspended for fourteen days.and referred.~_t'o the EAP. 1This employee tested negative for-drugs during follow-up: testingt. novever,- he '
l tested positive for alcohol during that same follow-upi est.- This.
t individual has had access restored and is in a follow-up testing program..
1 l
A second employee, who tested positive during a "for'cause" test (resulting' i
from an allegation) was still off~vork~in rehabilitation at,the end of'this period. The long term contractor who tested positive foridrugs!on a' random-test was not badged'for unescorted access, but'vas;in_the pool as "may be l
called upon in an emergency condition." This contractor employee resigned._
i l
L During July, NRC Region II personnel performed a fitness'for dut'j y
i inspection and the results,!vhich are being reviewed by'the Region'(no report has been issued), vill be discussed in thesecond period report.
3 a
i.
i 4
r l
l
?
I l
a, _,
- _ -. -~.-;
J
-