ML20065E218
| ML20065E218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1989 |
| From: | Morgan W COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Shemanski P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9010020041 | |
| Download: ML20065E218 (2) | |
Text
-
^
4' f:Si L,, t l
J 00mMORWO90th Edl80R' One Fir 2 Ntional Plan, Chicago. lilinoisl M ih_ %.
- 4, Address Reply to; Poet Omce Box 767 m-b ;g; g,
. Ch% tilinois 60690 0767 f j
g
' January 11,,1989'
- X 1
s Jn; w"
h;.
S., y 1
o ~.
7 ly (Office of-Nuclear Reactor Regulation-
' U6S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~ AT'IN Mr. - Paul ~ Shemanski ~
'Nashington, DC'.20555 4
Subjects. LaSalle County Station Unit 2~
Supplement to Application for-
'. M Amendment to Facility Operating i_
. License.NPF-18, Appendix A, Technical Specifications - Revision y
of Table 3.8.3.2-1 NRC Dockgt No._50-374 References (a): 'W.E.-Morgan letter to U.S. NR'C dated
- h December 2, 1988 transmitting Proposed s
+.
-(b):-
P.C. Shemanski1 1etter to H.E. Bliss dated December-27, 1988.-
o'
' Dear Mr. Shemanskis.
.. Pursuant-to 10 CFR-50,. Commonwealth Edison applied'for_an amendment
's
. < to: Facility, Operating License NPF-18," Appendix A, Technical' Specification -
m Jim '
,(Reference _(a)).-_-.The purpose of_this amendment was to revise Table 3.'8.3.~2-1 3'
to reflect new locations; of ' breakers for Valve' 2E12-F009, Residual Heat:
- 2.. A Removal' Shutdown _ Cooling Suction Isolation Valve.
- te, i E S.
, f,"
Reference;_(b) requested' Commonwealth Edison to reevaluate'the
- j f,d
- significant hazards consideration of the above mentioned amendment request!and" Wbk resubmitL.lt;for NRC review. 'Thelfollowing, attachment provides'the: request'e'dg I
b f ys? /information.
1 i
Please direct any questions you may;have'regardinglthis matter!to'
' this' office.
qs x,%
Very truly yours,
'ia
+
f;e ' ~
s -
i n
M
.s '
9'T $
W.-E..
organ Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m
+
n m., n a v
45 NAttachment-9010020041 890111 ADOCKOSCOg4 DR-W' pl ' j5492Ki
- 41 g C /.
} yl i
,@m ' lg S.pt,-!p
. 88 4
jk.
4
+
)
j
7
'ey
' [.
~..
~
j&[
yy y ;,; :.5 - -
+
4 t
s l,[
-)I
{7 s
iATTACHMENT!
%y _
1-g SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION
+
w
.. This proposed amendment reflects the changeLin: location'within the'same motor control center of the breaker compartment used to control l the Residual LHeat: Remov'al: Shutdown Cooling Suction IsolationMalve 2Eit-F809 7 'Itlaiso-ideletes references to' manufacturer part numbers because of changes to thef
~
- part numbers.
. Commonwealth Edison has evaluated the proposed Technical Specifications 4
! Amendment;and-has determined that it-does not represent a significant
. hazards consideration. ' Based on:the criteria for defining;a significant-.
1 hazards' consideration astablish'ed in 10CFR50.92, operation of LaBa11e County d
n s
- Station Unit' E'in accordance with the proposed amendment will net:-
I ;'
i l
1)
Involve.a significant' increase in the probability or consequences of ani p
-accident previously evaluated because l:: ;
The components themselves are unchanged with respect to their[ form,
~
' fit and function.. This change does net in any wayceompromise or i
e change;the basic function;of the equipment affacted,
' 4
- j
- 2) ^
Create the possibility.'ofia.new or different; kind of accident from any accident,previously evaluated because:L i
%g
, The function of the-breakers 'af fected is = unchanged /andfall associated, design requirements as required by.the. Technical Specifications are
-unchanged.
J
~
g
~
iI, '
3)L Involve.a significant reduction ~ in the'marginEof safety becauset
[*
The proposed' change is;merely an administrative changejwhich has no q
effect on the margin of' safety.
]
p&
4 y
jh ?
E.
10 f'
.j g
1
-I
'g t
{,.
p' ' o lf "
i?
ki i
M' s
C
6!
{ < >' l E
_