ML20065A905

Requests Copy of NRC Ltr Accepting Monroe County Petition to Intervene as Request for Action Under 10CFR2.206. Guidelines for Submitting Info Per 10CFR2.206 Requested

ML20065A905
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	02/16/1983
From:	Minock J CITIZENS FOR ENERGY & EMPLOYMENT, MINOCK, J.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8302220309
Download: ML20065A905 (3)

Text

~

,..~~+

LAW O P P I C E S JOHN R . MINOC K 1500 BUllL BUILDING DETROIT, MICllICAN 48226 (ans) 063-1700 February 16, 1983 Mr. Harold R. Denton Offioe of Nuclear. Reactor Regulation Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission Washington, DC 20555 RE: In the Matter of Detroit Edison Co.

(Enrico Fermi Atanic Power Plant,

Dear Mr. Denton:

Unit 2)

Docket No. 50-341 OL I am the attorney representing the Citizens for anployment and Energy who are the intervenors in the Detroit Edison Fermi II case before the Nuclear Regulatory Cmmission. I have heard that by letter you informed Monroe County that their Petition to Intervene, which was denied by the Licensing Board and was referred to your office by the Arp mla Board, has been accepted by your office as a petition under 10 CFR 2.206. CEE has not received notification to that effect. Please send me a copy of your letter to the County.

As intervenors in the case, we supported the County's intervention petiticn and appeal before the Licensing and Appeal Boards. CEE remains vitally interested in the offsite emergency planning issues which concern the County. The order of the Appeal Board does not state whether the plavlings CEE filed in support of the County were forwarded to your office.

If they were not, please advise me so that I can send copies to you.

CEE wants to present information to your office pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206. 'Ihe procedure under that regulation seens to be very informal though, and we have several questions regarding the most efficient manner for us to subnit that doctanentation to you.

1) What doctznents did the Appeal Board transmit to your office?

2) What are the time limits within which your office will accept materials?

3) Does your office have a preference for the form in which the materials are subnitted, e.g. written statenents, affidavits, or transcripts of public hearings?

4) If your office receives materials in reply from the Applicants or Staff, will the County and CEE also be served with them?

5) Will there be an opportunity for the County and CEE to reply to the Applicants and Staff?

8302220309 830216 7 PDR ADOCK 05000341 g PDR

Mr. Harold R. Denton February 16, 1983 page 2 Your assistance in giving CEE and bbnroe County sane guidelines for subnitting information to your office will be very much appreciated.

Your truly,

'b / .Yh R. Minock cc: bbnroe County Cmmissioners Attorney for CEE Sen. Carl Ievin Sen. Donald W. Riegle Rep. John D. Dingell Colleen Woodhead Harry Voight Peter Marquardt i

,. _ .__ _ . _ .m . _ ... _

-__ ,.. _ _ _ . . . _ . . . . . _ _ . . . _ . .. _ _ . m . _ .

4 i

.i

?

, - ~ -

., m-. - -

F

..w.,_,,,,

, i 6

• w.. -

, , ,g . i t .

3'; -

' f: . , -

~.. ,

i LAW O l' F I C E S 6, ri

• 2 h ., e ' , i

, l .I O l-l N R . AlINOC K - -

usa -

i 1500 Ill!!IL I)t!!LDING { 15 f i_ a N. s' '

~

DETROIT, MICillGAN 4t$3;?G , -

fo o , ,

- _,~. ,

~_/ ,

1 1

,i Mr. Harold .R. Denton ,

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation -

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 t

t ,

9 I

I k g i f

. (

r i

- - ~ . - - . 7 , , , . , , , , _ _ , , . . . . , , , . . . . , _ y.._,,,,.

i 4

I