ML20064L217

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Performance Improvement Program in Response to NRC 820118 Order Modifying License,Effective Immediately. Program Details 18 to 24-month Period That Will Result in Demonstrated Effective Regulatory Performance
ML20064L217
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 03/18/1982
From: Harrington W
BOSTON EDISON CO.
To: Haynes R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19291G193 List:
References
82-86, EA-81-063, EA-81-63, NUDOCS 8204160222
Download: ML20064L217 (3)


Text

..

~

e t

=

Co:: TON EHCCN CMMPANY 500 BOVLsTON STREET l

BOeTON, MASSADMUSETTS D2199

{

f wituam o. MARRMSTON March 18, 1982 l

BECo. Ltr. No. 82-86 l

1 Mr. Ronald C. Haynes.,

f Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 License No. DPR-35 i

Docket No. 50-293 l

Dear Sir:

i By letter dated January 18, 1982, the Commission by the Director of l

Inspection and Enforcement, issued an Order Modifying License Effective Immediately (the Order). This Order required that Boston Edison Company (BECo) submit to the Administrator of Region I of the Nuclear Regulatory l

Commission (NRC) for review and approval, a comprehensive plan of action j

(the Plaa) that "will yield an independent appraisal of site and corporate j

l management organizations and functions, recommendations for improvements in management controls and oversight, and a review of previous safety-related activities to evaluate compliance with NRC requirements." On l

February 16, 1982, at BECo's request, the time for submission of the l

Plan was extended to March 19, 1982.

l The attached Boston Edison Performance Improvement Program submitted in i

response to the Order details an 18 to 24 month program that will result l

in demonstrated effective regulatory performance and continued safe and l

reliable operation of the Pilgrim f acility. The program includes an independent appraisal of site and corporate organizations and functions, modifications in organizational structure, improvements to be made in aanagement control and oversight systems, and programs designed to improve individual performance.

1 i

The indapendent appraisal is likely to provide information relevant to i

both the scope and schedule of the Performance Improvement Program, and i

is likely to modify _ the long term tasks and milestones identified in the -

i attached plan. BECo will provide the Administrator of Region I of the NRC all program revisions and a description of implementation staff requirments, documentation requirements, and specific schedule milestones Lin July 1982.

We believe the program is comprehensive and focused on effective management

.for continued safe plant-operation. The following are considered to be key tasks.

Specific reference to each aspect of the Order is provided.

  1. y [62oyj6023.X XA.

.@ I f

At.M Y

F c.

~.. ~ ~. - _.. -....... ~..

... ~. -.. ~. - -- -.- - -. - -.-- - -

)

WOSTON EOCIN COMPANY.

. March 18, 1982

)

Page Two i

BECo intends to better control the scheduling and implementation of future modification work performed within the plant. This will be accomplished by limiting the. total number of craf t personnel as well as l

the ntaber of areas being worked.

Complete engineering and procurement will be accomplished prior to the start of work to minimize construction durations. Engineering and analysis efforts will be similarly maintained l

at safe, effective, manageable levels. Work scoping, planning and j

authorization will be implemented with improved rigor and work activities i

more effectively controlled. Emphasis will be placed on the quality of

-work and the ability to achieve committed completion dates. This control program was discussed with Region I personnel on February 16, 1982 and with NRR at our meeting on February 19, 1982 and may require schedule i

rtdief from NRC in meeting certain in service dates, for future modifi-cation. This strategy is an essential supporting element of the Perfor-j mance Improvement Plan.

Obviously a key milestone in the process is the approval of the Comprehensive l

Plan. BECo believes the Plan is responsive to the NRC request; however, i

we are prepared'tndiscuss and resolve any questions which may arise. We j

also consider the Plan to be sufficiently comprehensive to encompass the prr51 ems identified in your Inspection Report dated February 4,1982.

i Once the Plan is approved, BECo will continue to update the NRC through periodic meetings at a frequency to be specified by Region I.

l Very truly yours, j

i e

a 4^'Jd'E 4

WDH/ag Enclosures l

cc:

Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director i

l' l

I t-k l

a.

BECO COMPREHENSIVE ACTION PLAN FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS I

i t

Reference Paragraph in Section V Task to Order Modifying License i

?

1.

INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND EVALUATION E

1.

Management Analysis Company Assessment 1

i 5

2.

Organizational Peer Group Review of 1

Independent Evaluation

+

t II.

ORGANIZATION 1.

Corporate On-Site Review 6

I 2.

Safety Organization Review 3,6,7 i

t III. MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS 1.

Commitment Management Systems 2

L a.

Commitment Control f

b.

Regulatory Change and Compliance c.

Corrective Action d.

Correspondence Review 2.

Safety Management Systems 3,6,7 a.

Safety Review and Assessment b.

QA Audit Program i

3.

Configuration Management Systems 4

a.

Modification Management

[

b.

Plant Procedure and Drawing Evaluation c.

Testing Program d.

Preventative Maintenance System IV.

INDIVIDUAL PERPORMANCE l

t 1.

Improved Training Program 5

1 a

3 1

i f

I.

t h

I i

.. - - - -... --,.