ML20064K735
| ML20064K735 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie, Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/1993 |
| From: | Grazio R FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grimsley D NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| References | |
| FOIA-93-284, RTR-NUREG-CR-5250 NUDOCS 9403230258 | |
| Download: ML20064K735 (22) | |
Text
-!
/'
Florida Power & Ught Company P.O. Box 14000, Juns Beach, FL 33408-0420 f
L FPL May 6, 1993 FAf1 DOM 0F INFORMATION Mr.
D.H.
Grimsley, Director ACT REQUEST l
Division of Freedom of Information and
[d(( $~M Public Services Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission g/
-/f
[ -
Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Grimsley:
In January 1989, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL),
under contract to the USNRC, published an eight volume report NUREG/CR-5250 (UCID-21517) on seismic hazard characterization of 69 nuclear power plant sites east'of the Rocky Mountains.
Two of the sites, Turkey Point and St. Lucie are owned by Florida Power &
i Light Company and they were ranked 67th and 68th, respectively in seismic hazard characterization.
At a NRC staff public meeting held at the Crowne Plaza, Rockville, MD on March 9, 1993 Dr. J.
Savy of LLNL and Ms.
P. Sobel of USNRC presented revised, but unpublished seismic hazard characterizations for Pilgrim, Braidwood, Millstone, Shearon Harris, Crystal River, Byron, Vogtle and Seabrook.
Dr. Savy verbally informed Mr.
J.R.
l Luke of my staff that LLNL had also prepared
- revised, but i
unpublished seismic hazard characterizations for Turkey ~ Point and St. Lucie.
t Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act and the implementing of I
regulations in Title 10 of the Code of ' Federal Regulations, I i
hereby request the following:
Any and all narratives,
- tables, figures,
.f charts,-graphs or other documentation in the
{
possession of the USNRC. or it's contractor l
LLNL pertaining to the seismic hazard characterization of the Turkey Point and/or St. Lucie sites prepared by LLNL subsequent' to i
January 1, 1992.
t Note:
Representative sample documentation from NUREG/CR-5250 is provided herewith as Pages E-1 through E-10 and G-1 through G-10 to r
assist your staff.
I 9403230258 930506
~
an FPL Group company
~1
I
\\
JNL-93-093 Page 2 of 2 1
If the USNRC is not able to provide documentation which is in the possession of LLNL, please inform me as soon as possible so that I can send a FOIA request directly to LLNL.
Please let me know if the cost of responding to this request will exceed $1,000.00.
Ver truly yours, 14C
~
Robert E. Gra io Director Nuclear Licensing REG /JRL/vmg cc:
JNL-93-093
+
h h
t
.r l
E.U.S. SEIEMIC HA ARD CHARACTERi2ATioN l
LOWER MAGNITUDE Cf if4TEGPATION 15 5.0 i
-i HA:ARD CUPVES USING ALL EXPERTS
'O e - BEST ESTIMATE.-
2 3f A - ARITHMETIC MEAN E
i O
-3 t 10
- \\.
\\
-4 A.
.> 10 N
B
\\.
m A
o s
\\g go i
N
'* x g
N N
s 6
io
~ _.
-7 10
.4 m
o e
e on
-g O
ACCELERAT ION CM/ SCC'2' ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.1 Comparison of the BEHC and AMHC aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the St. Lucie Site.
E-1
r.
m
.q y
E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHARACTERl2Afl0N LOWER MAGNITUDE CF INTEGRATION IS 5.0 BEST ESTIMATE FOR THE SEtSuiCITY EXPERTS
-1 10
-2 10 n
5 w>
tb s
m
.N x
s v
1L g
w
_4 s
y 10
\\[.
.I vs w
h.\\.
4 N
'N Yijy, k' J
to
)
'Da N
,,7
'A.
-n n
n n
e e
n e
e O
ACCELERATION CM/SEC'*2 ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.2 BEHCs per S-Expert Combined over all G-Experts for the St.
LuCie site. Plot symbols given in Table 2.0.
)
1 E-2
7 S
E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHAPACTERIZATION LOWER MAGNITUDE OF INTEGRATION IS 5.0 PERCENTILES =
15., 50. AND 65.
1 HAZARD CURVES USING ALL EXPERTS to
-2 to E
O
-3 g to E
5
\\
U 10
\\
sN
-5 N
3 to
\\
5
\\
s x
E
\\,
\\
10
'N
-7
\\
~
10 u
n c
o u
e e
g O
ACCELERATION CM/SEC
ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.3 CPHCs for the 15th, 50th and 85th percentiles based on all S and G-Experts' input for the St. Lucie site.
E-3
t1 4
i l
I r
o P
HAZARD CURVES USlHG ALL EXPERTS
-1 10 CURVE 1 3.75<MG<5.0
-2 CURVE 2 5.0<v0<5.75 10 CURVE 3 5.75<u8<6.5
{
U CURVE 4 6.5<us 5
-3 3 to d=
E b
3
-4 y 10 N
w I
b
-5 s
s 10 4
10-
.l 7
9f
,{
n n
w an e
n a
m
-g C
ACCELERATION CM/SEC'*2 4
ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.4 BEHCs which include only the contribution to the PGA hazard from earthquakes within the indicated magnitude range for the St. Lucie site.
E-4
('
g;
?,,..
1 k
?
i i
t..U.5 3 ISMIC HAZARD CHARACTER 12AT IOt4 LOWER MAGNITUDE OF INTEGRATION 15 5.0 500.
1000.
2000..
5000..
10000. TEARS RETURN PERIOD DEST CSTluATE SPECTRA COMBINED OVER ALL EXPERTS 3
to 2
10 84 10
/
~
0 10
/
-1 10
,,,,,n,
,, n,,,
,,,,, m
~ o Yo Io PERIOD (SEC) o ST. LUCIE i
BEUllS for return periods of 500, 1000, 2000, 5000 and 10000 J
Figure 2.14.5 years aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the St. Lucie site.
)
E-5
,S' E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION LOWER MAGNITUDE Or INTEGRATION IS 5.0 BEST ESTIMATE SPECTRA BY SEISMIC EXPERT TOR 1000. YEARS RETURN PERIOD 3
10 2
to o
M N
n
/
5 3
3o' E
/8 Y
lj t h ' f) 8
'c" k/
f>/
io
~
Yo Io PERIOD (SEC) o o
ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.6 The 1000 year return period BEUHS per S-Expert aggregated over all G-Experts for the St. Lucie site. Plot symbols are given in Table 2.0.
E-6 i
, 9 P
E.U.S SEISMIC HAZAno CHARACTERIZATION LOWER MAGNITUDE OF INTECRATION IS 5.0 500.-YEAR RETURN PERIOD CONSTANT PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR :
PERCENTILES = 15.
- 50. AND 85.
5 to
.)
l i
2 10 l
8R 3
io' C
U S
E O
10 j
-1
'O n n v.n m u n < e sono n p n c.omo o-O.
.i Yo Io PERIOD (SEC)
I I
ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.7 500 year return period CPUHS for the 15th, 50th and 85th percentiles aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the St.
Lucie site.
1 E-7
\\
f E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION LCwCR MAGNITUDE Of INTEGRATION 1S 5.0 1000.-YEAR RETURN PERIOD CONSTANT PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR,
PERCENTILES =
15.
- 50. AND 25.
3 10 2
10 d
R 5
30 8
d#
/
0 to
-1 to
,,m
,, n,,o,
,, n
,o w
~
Yo PERIOD (SEC) o o
S ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.8 1000 year return period CPUHS for the 15th, 50th and 85th percentile aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the St.
Lucie site.
t E-8
r.
e.
E.U.S SElSWIC HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION LCWER MAGNITUDE OF INTEGRATION IS 5.0 10000.-YEAR RETURN PERIOD CONSTANT PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR.
PERCENTILES =
15.
- 50. AND 85.
3 to t
2 10 u
M N
b 10
/
d
/
/
r 0
10 to n n ~ cm
<< n w c orm se n m.a m
~
Io PERIOD (SEC) o o
o ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.9 10000 year return period CPUHS for the 15th, 50th and 85th percentiles aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the St.
Lucie Site.
E-9
I 5
i i
i E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHARACTERl2ATION LCWER MAGNITUDC Of INTEGRATION IS 5.0 50-TH PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR ALL RETURN PER1005 3
to 2
10 8
R b
to C
A
~
to 5
- /
RETURN PER1005.
/
CURVE 5 = 10000. YEARS
/
CURVE 4 = 5000. YEARS 3[
CURVE 3 = 2000. YEARS CURVE.2 = 1000. YEARS 2'[
CURVE 1 m 500. YEARS
.i io O
Yo Io PERIOD (SEC) o i
ST. LUCIE Figure 2.14.10 Comparison of the 50th percentile CPUHS for return periods of 500,1000, 2000, 5000 and 10000 years for the St. Lucie site.
E-10 1
i E.U.S. SEISMIC HA:ARD CHARACTER 12AY10N LCwCR MAGNITUDE CT INTEGRATION (S !.0
-t HAIARD CURVES USlf4G ALL EXPERTS 10 s.
B - BEST ESTlMATE 2
3f A - ARITHMETIC MEAN E
W
-3 a
to 4
y k
Ib
'-x' s
,' N w
5 B-E
'O g
E M.s ' Ni a
-s 10 i
l l
7 10 e
e, n
n e
s e
m g
0 ACCELERAT ION Cu/SEC"2 1
TURKEY Poll 4T Figure 2.15.1 Comparison of the BEHC and AMHC aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the Turkey Point site.
G-1
l
- ,s 4 l
ci E.U.S SEISv;C HAZARD CHAPACTrRIZATION LOWER MAGNITUDE Cf INTEGPATION is 5.0 BEST ESTruATE
.i FOR THE SEISMICITY ErPERTS 10
-2 10 E
O
- g
=
3
$ 10
\\
N O
'N
'N r.'
N N
-4 U to
\\
QN, < A1%
O
- l 8
Y '; \\
\\ }\\\\
N N
t
-5 NN' $
i N,
l'
'90. ' 9
\\
$h 8
-6 s
I i
NN x
Nl
'wN 10 g
a n
w n
e n
e m
C ACCELERATION CM/SEC"2 TURKEY POINT Figure 2.15.2 BEHCs per S-Expert combined over all G-Experts for the Turkey Point site.
Plot symbols given in Table 2.0.
G-2
e 1
,1 i
l s
t L
i t
f l
E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHAPACTERl2ATION LCwCR MAG 7817UDE Cf INTECPATION 15 5.0 t
PERCENT!LEs =
15., 50. AND 85.
l
-1 HAZAFD CURVES USING ALL EXPERTS 10 l
t
-2 10 ce i
h h
i
-3 6
'O
\\
\\
w E
\\.
g N
\\
s.
w y 10
\\
J B
I
-s w
\\
~
5
- 10
\\
\\
1 5
\\
o
-N s
E
.'N i
10 4
1 l
-7 s'
10 r
g N
n w
n e
n
.e m
O ACCELERATION CM/SEC' TURKEY Poll 4T Figure 2.15.3 CPHCs for the 15th, 50th and 85th percentiles based on all S and G-Experts' input for the Turkey Point site.
G-3
. m i
i m
-1 HAZARD CURVES USING ALL EXPERTS 10 CURVE 1 3.75<u0<5.0
-2 CURVE 2 5.0<u0<5.75 10
{
CURVE 3 5.75<uB<6.5 W
CURVE 4 6.5<u8 g to E
j i
3
-4 a
10 1b K
5 8
-6 10 k N N
7 jf
-~
~
~
O ACCELERATION CM/SEC"2 TURKEY POINT Figure 2.15.4 BEHCs which include only the contribution to the PGA hazard from earthquakes within the indicated magnitude range for the Turkey Point site.
G-4
g v,-
i t
h i
P s
E.U.S SEISWIC HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION LCwER MAGNITUDE Or INTEGRATION 85 5.0 l
500.. 1000.
2000..
5000..
10000. YEARS RETURN PERIOD 3
BEST CSTluATE SPECTRA COMBINED OVER ALL EXPEPTS 10 2
to S
R b
10 b
l
/
/ /
10
/
_t i
'o
.. -,,.. ~
~
Yo IO PERIOD (SEC) o O
TURKEY POINT l
Figure 2.15.5 BEUHS for return periods of 500, 1000, 2000, 5000 and 10000 years aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the Turkey Point t i site.
1 l
.I r
G-5
.*f E.U.S SEISulC HAZARD CHAPACTERIZATION LCWER MAGNITUDE Cf INTEGRATION l', 5.0 BEST ("suAf f 'F 0 L BY SElsulC EXPERT FOR 1000. YEARS RETURN PERIOD 3
10
=
i 2 !
10 8
R 3
iO
'N 0
M 10 r
N--
y
/
l-10
~
o Io PER800 (SEC) o O
TURKEY POINT Figure 2.15.6 The 1000 year return period BEUHS per S-Expert aggregated over all G-Experts for the Turkey Point site.
Plot symbols are given in Table 2.0.
G-6
)
O i
s e
i E.U.s SElsuic HAZARD CHARACTER 12ATION LCWER MAGNITUDE Cr INTEGRATION 15 5.0 500,-YEAR RETURN PERIOD CONSTANT PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR :
PERCENTILES =
15.
- 50. AND 85.
3 10 2
to I
u M
N b
J to C
o a
5 0
10 9
10 m n w.n wee tv n. 2w -
c.
m, v i ew.
~
Yo Io PERIOD (SEC) o C
TURKEY POINT Figure 2.15.7 500 year return period CPUHS for the 15th, 50th and 85th percentiles aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the Turkey Point site.
G-7
7
^JT t
C.U.S $EISMIC HAZARD CHAFACTER12ATION LCwER MAGNITUDE CF INTEGRATION 15 5.0 1000.-YEAR RETURN PERIOD CONSTANT PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR PERCENTILES =
15.
- 50. AND 25, 3
10 2
10 o
U 10 Go W
10
/
[
-1 10 Yo Io PERIOD (SUC) o o-
~
TURKEY POINT Figure 2.15.8 1000 year return period CPUHS for the 15th, 50th and 85th-percentile aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the Turkey Point site.
G-8
r; l
i E.U.S SEISMIC HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION LOWER MAGNITUDE CF INTECRATION IS 5.0 10000.-YEAR RETURN PERIOD Cot 4STANT PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR :
PERCENTILES
- 15.
- 50. AND 85.
3 10 2
10 8
10
/
/
o S
l W
/
to
/
/
10
~
To Io PEPl00 (SEC) o o
TURKEY POINT 10000 year return period CPUHS for the 15th, 50th and 85th Figure 2.15.9 percentiles aggregated over all S and G-Experts for the Turkey.
Point Site.
G-9
a.
n~
n.._
'N i
.ske 5
(
n<
E.U.S SEl!H8C HAZARD CHAPACTERIIAitON LCwER MAGNITUDE Cr INTECPATION IS 5.0 l
50-TH PERCENTILE SPECTRA FOR ALL RETURN PERIOOS 3
l 10 l
l 2
I to l
l 8e I
10 l
N G
l S
y l
3 0
10 HuuhN PEMODS :
Vr * - t 0000. YEARS CURVE 4 = 5000. YEARS l
CURVE 3 a 2000. YEARS CURVE 2 = 1000. YEARS g
CURYE 1 =
500. YEARS 10
<* n * = > =
s.
o * <> wnao.
c.
n,.n.-
2 70 PERIOD (SEC) o 0
~
TURKEY POINT l
l Figure ?.15.10 Comparison of the 50th percentile CPUHS for return periods of 500,1000, 2000, 5000 and 10000 years for the Turkey Point site.
1 n 1n l
.;