ML20064H456
| ML20064H456 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/1982 |
| From: | Lundvall A BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20064H432 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301170314 | |
| Download: ML20064H456 (2) | |
Text
_..-
~_..-.1
?
BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER P.O. BOX 1475. BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 ARTHUR E. LUNovALL. JR.
v.cc enc *=m December 17, 1982 Suppty U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Mos.
50-317 Region 1 50-318 631 Park Avenue License Nos. DPR-53 King of Prussia, PA 19406 DPR-69 ATIETfION:
R. W. Starostecki, Director Division of Project and Resident Programs Gentlemen:
This refers to your Inspection 50-317/82-26; 50-318/82-22, which transmitted two items of apparent noncompliance with NRC requirements.
Enclosure (1) to this letter supplements the information provided in our November 16, 1982 letter, A. E. Lundvall, Jr. to R. W. Starostecki.
Should you have further questions regarding this reply, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Very truly yo
,9
,,')
,/
j.-
/
/
p C,,, sv&m/l_.
Vice President - Supply AEI/IMI/sjb Enclosure cc:
J. A. Biddison, Esquire G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire D. H. Jaffe, NRC R. E. Architzel, NRC 8301170314 830106 PDR ADOCK 05000317 G
l ENCI.OSUPE (1)
SUPPIEME!EAL FEPLY 'IO APPENDIX A OF NRC l
INSPECTICN REPORT NO. 50-317/82-26; 50-318/82-22 I
Item A.1 Although the original response to this item noted that the Calvert Cliffs 9
Technical Specifications do not require a "refbeling procedure" for fuel pin transfers, we reemphasize that we recognize the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B to have procedures for evolutions of this nature.
Accordingly, the current Baltinore Gas and Electric Conpany Quality Assurance pmgram has procedures to comply with the 10 CFR 50 Appendix B requirements and we fully intend to act in accordance with these require-ments.
Item A.2 Although the corrective actions for this item were described in our initial response, that response did not fb11y convey our intent to conply with the requirements of 10 CFr. " 59. The Baltimore Gas and Electric Conpany recognizes the requirentrns of 10 CFR 50.59 and has removed the blind flange fron the replacement air blower discharge.
The Responsible Design Organization will perform an analysis of the effect of flanging the replacenent air blower if we determine that flanging is desired. The results of this analysis will be reported to NRR as required by 10 CFR 50.59 Should we decide to retire the Hydmgen Purge portion of the Hydrogen Control System, an FSAR revision will be processed as specified by 10 CFR 50.59.
l l
To prevent recurrence, we noted the addition of a checklist to the governing instructio~ for the Calvert Cliffs Operating Manual (CCOM).
We stated the checklist would include the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). Additionally, the checklist will include 10 CFR 50.59. Use of the checklist will alert us to proposed CCOM revisions which might be inconsistent with the requirements of the FSAR or 10 CFR 50.59.
We still expect to conplete this preventive action by February 28, 1983 1
m.-
y___.-.e
~ ~ -,--,--nm.,_y,m---,.,4%
.-,._~
.e
., r,..,,, _
_