ML20064G225

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Expresses Concern Re Proposed Const of Subj Facils & Safe Burial of Radioactive Nuc Waste.Earth Inner Area Fouled W/Chem,Fish Poisoned W/Pcb,Nearby Cook & Palisades Plants Have Faulty Records Re Excessive Emissions
ML20064G225
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook, Bailly
Issue date: 11/17/1978
From: Curtis E
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 7812080028
Download: ML20064G225 (1)


Text

1 l

4 I

d l 60 -4G 7 [/

m -443, W!

620 M. 16th

,g Miles, Michigan 49120 n U n!.T C D O C W E N f;ovember 17, 1978 Nuclear Regulatory Commiscion ,-

1717 H. Street Northuest / C Ls -, ,f-. c r, Q.' .

Washington, D. C. 20C05 Q,/ - s,A3

./.g/ ,

- u.

,s s

/.

- e t . _, ;

.. - u ..tu Sailly Nuclear Plent {i3 ,

. D y. ' ,",.pf. .j 4' j Seabrock Plant .

' Y , _. ' -

q , 6/

Gentlemon: <A. 4% '. ~

N W - - % ,'

Q ~::i ,e ~~

In the hcy 2, 1978 Detroi Free Press in an itcm entitled "i!cu dcubt en a cmic storage" it explained that Governncnt geo]cgists that it is ncu impcssible and may never be possible to quaran".ee thc. permanant, safe burial of radio-active nuclear uastes.

I cannot see the justice of manufacturing electricity resulting in a vaste that the people uho manufacture this vaste co not uish to store. Ue have fouled uc the earth so much eith chemicals--our fish in iiichigan are poisonec uith PCS. Uc Esta in Miles live counuind frcm Cock Guclear and Palisades--these both have hed faulty records with regard to excessive emissions.

Conccuncing these errors by allowing the construction of these two plants is likened, to ce, the pandering of child pornography--bcth are Fcr s cf c-iir abuse.

Sincerely, , . .

L ,. ~'

3.

, ! .- /.*

,,; .6 o c'-
-:p C .r! {, ,- / .

Elaine Curtis

p. PS: At this writing there is an orone problem with cur air.

5s The air is frecher indccrs than cutdcors. Ue are living i

Og in cancer alley. Five of my neightcrs cied of cancer. i'y C'g' 22 year old daughter hao thyroid cancer.

9 Ue are told that radiation emissions from one nuke plant is f equivalent to 1 Chest x-ray a year. Eut we are dounuind from ~

(-T two plants. If esilly were operating three plants--3 chest x-rays a year. Are ue here in Niles expendable?

-. .- .- . ._ - _. - --