ML20064G063

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suppls Info Contained in .There Has Been a Check of Procedures to See That All Superseded Procedures Are Clearly Marked.Marking Superceded Procedures Should Avoid Repetition of Generic Prob of Oper W/Old Procedures
ML20064G063
Person / Time
Site: 05000148
Issue date: 11/13/1978
From: Kraft D
KANSAS, UNIV. OF, LAWRENCE, KS
To: Madsen G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20064G061 List:
References
NUDOCS 7812060319
Download: ML20064G063 (1)


Text

.. __ ___ - . _ _ _ _ _ _

l 1

h It !:::: A\

g :j . ;; 4.~..6 .m ~,,

l i, 3 ycf a*

\r rs

'D THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Scho H of F.n:;tneering 0:f. _ e: the Dean 1010 Learned iia 11. Law renca, !{ansas titi'.) l; 913-80 l-3 e1 Novernber 13, 1978 hi r. G. L. hladsen U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis sion 611 Ryan Plaza Drive A rling to n, Texas

Dear M r. Ala d s e n:

I wish to supplement the information in my letter to you of October 26, 1978. I do this as a result of a telephone conversation Air. W M. Dickers on had with ou r rea ctor supe rviso r.

We have checked our Cile of procedures to see that all supe rseded procedures are clearly so ma rked and they w ere. In the future we v.ill make a point of so marking any procedure which becomes superseded.

This should a' cert any repetition of the generic problem of operation with a supe rseded procedure.

Since rely, David C. Kraf t Dean Pc 781206 O> /9

)