ML20064C232
| ML20064C232 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 11/16/1982 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20064C102 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301040351 | |
| Download: ML20064C232 (2) | |
Text
-
r DUKE POWER GOMPAlHP C E E C' ~
r.o. ex 33189 3 i; # 1, ; _ ; D 1. J.
oHAMLOTTE, N.G. 28242 HALH.TIJGKEH TELEPHONE (704) 373-4531 vusrurnme=t 16,1989 y{}if N A 0
- lb
" " * ' ~ ~ "
November Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:SALP IE Report Nos. 50-269/82-34, 50-270/82-17, 50-287/82-34; 50-369/82-30, 50-370/82-24; 50-413/82-23, 50-414/82-21
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
In response to Mr. R. C. Lewis's letter dated October 19, 1982, Duke Power Company submits the following comments concerning the SALP Board Report for the Oconce, McGuire, and Catawba Nuclear Stations.
In general, Duke endorses the observations contained in the report regarding the performanc'e at each of the nuclear stations. Although pleased with the overall results, Duke will continue to seek improvements in the performance of station activities to maintain or improve conduct of the functions outlined in the report.
The company considers that the report, however, does not fully recognize the considerable efforts that have been expended to reduce the level of personnel errors occurring at its nuclear stations. It is often difficult to fully document in a Licensee Event Report all actions that are taken in response to these occurrences. Trend analyses conducted by Duke and information pre-sented by your Staff in the SALP meeting support the fact that the company has been successful in reducing the frequency of these events and compares favorably with other licensees in this area. The company will continue to pursue the basic cause of any incident to assure proper corrective action and to address any generic weaknesses. This should be the primary purpose of reviews by both the company and the NRC.
We look forward to working with members of your Staff in attaining this goal.
Duke Power Company does not consider any information contained in the subject IE Inspection Report to be proprietary.
Very truly yours, b
(d Hal B. Tucker RWO/php 8301040351 821209 4
PDR ADOCK 05000269 G
o.
k Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator November 16, 1982 Page 2 cc:
Mr. Robert Guild, Esq.
Attorney-at-Law P.O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Palmetto Alliance 2135 Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Mr. Jesse L. Riley Carolina Environmental Study Group 854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 l