ML20064B601
| ML20064B601 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1990 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20064B597 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9010180159 | |
| Download: ML20064B601 (2) | |
Text
......
l
[f c{
UNITED STATES
+
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, v.
g s
W A SHING TON, D. C. 705b5
\\q -
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR. REGULATION I
RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 63 TO FAClllTY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-38 i
ENTERGY OPERATIONS. INC.
i i
WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION. UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-382 l
n
1.0 INTRODUCTION
l 1
By application dated July 25, 1990, EntergyOperations,Inc.(thelicensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (Appendix A) to facility Operating License No. NPF-36 for Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.
i The proposed changes would update the name changes in the organization to reflect operations by Entergy Operations, Inc.
2.0 O!SCUSSION in License Amendment No. 60 dated December 14, 1989, the NRC approved the transfer of operations from Louisiania Power and Light Company to Entergy Operations, Inc.
It was understood at that time that changes would be made at the three affected sites to reflect operations by a single entity.
Accordingly, Entergy Operations, Inc now proposes to combine the duties
~
of Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations and Vice President - Nuclear, l
and replace the titles with Vice President Operations. Each of the three sites will now have a position of the same title and duties.
Entergy Operations, Inc. also proposes to change the titles of certain positions with no change in duties.
These positions and duties will correspond to those at the other sites.- Those-sites are for the Grand Gulf Unit I and the Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2.
l i
3.0 EVALVATION The licensee proposes to combine the site duties of two upper management positions and rename four positions with no change in duties. The site duties of the two previous upper management positions as defined in the-i I
Technical Specifications can be accomplished by the one individual. The i
other changes are in title only with no change in responsibilities. We find the proposed changes acceptable.
4.0 CONTACT WITH STATE OFFICIAL The NRC staff has advised the Administrator, Radiation Protection Division, i
Department of Environmental Quality, State of Louisiana of the proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration. No connents were received.
h 9010180159 901002 PDR ADOCK 05000382 PNU
_____,.u
i.
2
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
This amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, reporting, or administrative procedures or requirements. Accordingly, the amendment meets the elig)ibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10CFR51.22(c(10). Pursuantto10CFR51.22(b)noenvironmentalimpact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
6.0 _ CONCLUSION i
Based upon its evaluation of the proposed changes to the Waterford 3 Technical Specifications, the staff.1as concluded that:
there is reason-able assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and 1
security or to the health and safety of the public. The staff, therefore, concludes that the proposed changes are acceptable.
Dated: October 2. 1990 principal Contributor:
D. Wigginton 1
4 N
8
.n
+. - - -
-.L.