ML20064B540
| ML20064B540 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 10/10/1990 |
| From: | Sieber J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9010180069 | |
| Download: ML20064B540 (8) | |
Text
\\r 5.
4jl; i
i y
j.'.4.,.,
,1 f
.it-4 4'lM:, ' '
j
/
I'.
QX 5
Z~z ; -
Stuppngport. PA 1507700C4 i T-e i
I i
.i NYweso%
1412) wJ62551
~
l
-l l
October 10, 1990' (U. S.'. Nuclear Regulatory Commission x
-Attn:' Document' Control Desk l
Washington, DC '20555 1
'l
Reference:
,. Beaver Valley Power Station,. Unit No.'1 and No.'2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR BV-2-Docket No. 50-412,. License No. NPF-73 1
{-
Fitness-For-Duty-Program Six' Month' Report' 4[
Gentlemen:'
l O
Please find a revised copy of our six month report..
The original-f report Lcontained't an ' error -due= to a-misunderstanding. by thefMRO regarding reporting,an adjudicated positive for' opiates as a positive J
rather than a
negative.
The error.was reflected in the^ licensee.
. employees: Lrandom,. positive column.
In addition, there-is also~a' D
l correction.regarding'our.six month random testing: status, fj The' attached: report contains the information required by 10.CFR l
'26.71 (d)Eand~ encompassed the reporting period January.- June 1990.
C If :there are.any. questions concerning this-report, please contact F
Ms;' Pat Casasanta, Manager of Human Resources'(412).393-5238..
Very t'ruly yours, l(
\\
N NAu-6 D. Sieber Vice President' Nuclear' Group
- l cc:
Mr. J.
Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr.'T. T. Martin, NRC Region I. Administrator Mr. A. W. DeAgazio, Project Manager 1
-U.
S. NRC Mail Drop P1-137 H
9010i80 69"901010 ADOCK 0500g' {4
((?;{/
PDR R
I//.
m ; \\';;6_ :(- ; ;
a
, o me.
. 6.%
3 b
1 t/ y l Fitness for Duty Program l
-1
%w < -
Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 m
e m
y s
i e
Duquesne L1ght Company June'30,;1990' 7
- commen, e m snerg s!
P Beaver Valley Power Station I
x(*
LOWen T
Pat Casasanta 412-393-5238 canum m lP Phere lwune eres eseel h
Cutoff s: ScreervConfirmaten (ng/mt)
. E Appendix A to 10CFR 26 i
a Manjuana
/.
Amphetarnines
-/
I-Cocaine
/
Phencyclidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/:
- a
' il Lon0 Term
. Short Temi -
i Testing Results Contractor Contractor-Ucensee Employees-Personnel-Personnel 1
Average Number with
@Q@{g:ggy Unescorted Access 1376 227
-291 y
y.
Referred Access i
Categories Tested Positive:
to EAP Restored Tested Positive' Tested Positive.
ff I
Pre employment :
upp,.y., 7
,. -7mv a v<.w
. :- : g.,
Pre-badging
- 130 0
126 0
357 5
@d[h;.js;fi@gfgg'$
f MN I
Penodic gjf p;2iWM 9N@ gee For cause t
t$
1^
- gmy 1
0 4 *w>
+
ovuw 1-0
{'
f
,k Post acceent er m!$$192dh i?S$$$
650 3
92 0
193 i
Follow up 5.
0 2
0 h_m$kfb_)$hfi Other 2^
l a Total 788 4
3 1
219 0
552 6
a
-y,.
,i 4 0 '
j 4
4
{
i e.
g 4,:
m i
k b
9i.,
,N<?-
i s
u s
g
.8 g
D u
2 E Jig in
\\
R
+
6,,
- a..
O g6 3
. V gg
.,N R
1
. E gi-x
/
o-9.'O m
71 e.
n a
- 1lll -
m A
g.0 4
m o
0'0 m
n 4
B '=0 ~ 'gl e
oo
' w x
E t
w e
g-I l
r-m,,
n N -
c v>
e
.6
.-g I
e'
_I E
e m
i 2
m om 3
s Es D
~
8 e.
a
[
E 1
6 3
83 i
3
& }
g 3
a l
1 j
f,*J
,y.
p 1.
~k ir
'j y
?'
+
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE: PROGRAM. '(EAP) RESULTS FOR MRO SIX-MONTH'REPOR[
'[
F t-i-
From the inception of the Fitness for Duty Program in January.,1990, through June, 1990,-our records indicate that tt.ree (3) Duquesne Light--
~
, Company: employees were admitted to the EAPI two have s.'nce returned to work. -Our records also i~ndicate that one (1) contracter. was.admi-tted to 1
h, the'EAP-and has returned to work.
e
~/mab-i
'..L t
5 l
i i
k i
\\
<e o
m j
. t i,.
4
'~#
x 3
=.-
by,..
j i.
, ca :..
1,' e i
- )
,q
,V8
' NUCLEAR GROUP' Nuclear Human Resources Department'
'i
- n
. Medical Section; 4
October 8,-1990, Revised i
NRO: 0019 i
MRO 00ttfENTS ON-SIX-MONTH'~ DATA SUttiARY
?
1 <
From January 1, 1990 to June 30, 1990, our random program was desi;>ned, Lto. test the posulation as follows:
TABLE 1: ' Estimated vs. Actual Random Teats g
'; (';
DIE -.SBI-CONT
'IUTAL
=,
2 SHOULD'HAVE TESTED 734-125' 216 1075
' ACTUAL TESTED-
.650.
89 194~
933
- g. -
.r DIFFERENCE 84 36 22 '-
142-
'i 4
i We are tracking our rate of testing and are making adjustments as l
needed.
4
/mab' 3
q i
' l:l l
. (:
'l N.e (j
3
-Y j:yly' ;
7 y
+
7",
g, p; i 1
-n :.
'14.31, X
7 jyv I'
-h1 i
ei NUCLEAR GROUP:
y 'h/,
y
~
- Nuclear Human ResourcesfDepartment~
A+R '
- Medical-Section fll k '
T 1th
. August: 24, 1990, MRO t ' 0020
~
U qin jp MRO COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT. ACTIONS i
\\
M:
As required'on Page 4 of the FFD Performance Data Form Explanation' f:
l(TAB 6of!the FFD Mancal-);, the,following is a list of,-lessons learned and b
' corrective action-taken from January 1,=1990 to June 30,'1990.
f,, -
1.
Problem Identified i n to;be l
- The' random generating program in our computer was noted s'
-pullingelists with several repeat names from a previouselist..
j These names were not all repeated f rom the sameidate, but on"any-
{
'N'(
given day, a new list would have. repeated severalinames,.all of-
-j which had occurred on-a single list-from aEprevious date.
1 q.
n Solytion Imnlemented:
t,',
l r
1 M/
A.new computer program has been' formulated.
It was being tested
}
' Carnegie Mellon-University.
Unien-and management officials were and' independently; evaluated-by a computer specialist from alerted to the problems immediately after.it:was identified.
g Progress of the new. computer.~programEis7being monitored.
j Untirithe new program.was on line,.the old computer program-q generated.our;clist of random employees to test.
Prior to using j
Lthis-test, however,:eachflist was comparedcto;all previous. lists-Si sinceEJanuaryci, 1990, 11 a new list contained more'than'one:(1-)
. l ib
. n a m e.f r r. m the same day of a previous list, or more than three J(3)
I K
names from different days' previous lists, the'new list was~
rejected as'"non-random":and another list printed out.
This has continued to the point where up to 12 new lists ~had-to be
. generated on any given day before a new, valid random list became 1
available.-
The new program was implemented on July-9, 1990..
'2' Problem Identifiedi i
t There is' currently no method in place to check on our day-to-day progress in' attempting to reach a. random test number equal to-l 1007. of the badged work force by year's end.
l i
,c.'
4 (f,
'/c Q i..' -
5
zt7 7
R
~
y(;* {,.'
i,, -
n e
0%
N/ N'.'MRO COMMENTS.ON. MANAGEMENT ACTIONS.
M C',%ugust-24.-1990/
- MRO
- , 0020 e
1 p
- .- o,c G P d g e t 2 c b:
Solution Prqnosedt
-A program"can~be formulated for software in our medical facility l
1 personal' computer.
This software will help us track-our daily.
t progress.
In addition, this software-can help us monitor-the
'F
. progress 'of-';our blinc proficiency testing and our; follow-up testing,-to; ensure its compliance with 10-CFR-26.
We intend to.
implement;the'use of-this software before January i, 1991.
b s
'{
P m3.-
Problem' iden ti f ied :
4
.iO-CFR-26' requires =that the MRO contact the licensee within ten' d
(IO)' days of;a presumptive positive screening test by the n
~ l a boratory., :The problem was that the MRO was-required to J
' adjudicate <each> positive and was not always able to do so'within(
l ten'(10).. days.since the certified copy ofwthe Chain of Custody
. form verifying'the positive test wasn't always available.
g 3
l a
i Solution Imole'mented:
L
.The secured. telety pe terminal prints out the lab report for;the MRO within one (1) day to two (2) days of the lab's test.
Arrangements'were made to overnight express-mail the certified i
copy of;the Chain-of Custody form to the MRO each day..
Weothus
.were able-to circumvent both the U.S.
Post Office and the company, c
. mail system, and their respective time delays.
1 h
Pri'or.to the overnight' express mail, system,.there were times when y
the Chain of Custody would be delayed for over120 days..
Our' d
' current turn-around time is four (4) to five (S) days.
4.
Problem Identified:
The Fitness 7 or-Duty Program Manager was not always immediately 4
F available to attend to' situations in which her input was.
i mandated..
1
(>
Solution implemented:
1 d
A' list was published of the Fitness-For-Duty Program Manager's j
designated representatives.
These individuals, listed in
{
9
' decreasing order of authority, are all well versed in the-Fitness-For-Duty Program.
One of these individuals is available at all times.
i i
i i
l
]
s
%C.yj 7,Sym 4 i
F MM, y <%We s
v U.
V-:
.o m
m;p9 2;
hih*[AMRO!COMMENTSLONMANAGEMENT-ACTIONS-
'Au g'u s t 1 24 ' 7 1990 t
IS"' "MRO : =0020 m-Pcgel3-gd ' f-m;,.
h
^
S.:
Problem Identified 1 y
JA J'
'i dh > < f
'I f :a urine specimen is colder than;90.5 degrees Fahrenheit,fthis l
4 Mj, ',
is reason to suspect it.is adulterat'ed.- Our. thermometer'only
[" '
registered down to 95 degrees Fahrenheit'..
P t f[m;'. a, j..
-Solution Implemented:
jjii gv New. thermometers which register down to BO.O. degrees Fahrenheit were' purchased.
e
.t Of' O
%;l' ' '
y6.
Problem Identified:
f,f,
Two of our personnel were trained as' instructors'onvthe 04 intoxilyzer, instrument.
During,this training, deficiencies were noted in our routine maintenance and care of these instruments.
.Eglution Imnlemented:
A monitored program was. implemented to routinely. rotate our y
/
intoxilyzers'out of service for maintenance and cleaning.
This t
in a.ll documented inJpermanent log books.
7.
Pro bj em Identified:
'An individual came'to the Medical Fa ci lIi ty to be-tested.
He insisted;on recording the entire procedure on a tape recorder.
i This.was allowed.
f i
Solution implemented:
Duquesne Light-Company was notified of this incident after'the r.
fact.-
We determined that it is illegal to tape record someone without their permission by Pennsylvania. State Law.
The collection site is no longer to grantipermission to tape record the collection procedure, t
O '.
OM/mab w
i 1
l i.
r i