ML20063P040

Application to Amend Licenses NPF-4 & NPF-7,revising Tech Specs Re Staff Working Hours.Request Does Not Involve Unreviewed Safety Question Per 10CFR50.59

ML20063P040
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	10/01/1982
From:	Leasburg R VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20063P041	List: ML20063P040 ML20063P045
References
569, GL-82-02, GL-82-12, GL-82-2, NUDOCS 8210120215
Download: ML20063P040 (1)

Text

• ,

VInOINIA ELucraic Awn Powsm CoxPANY H acatwoxn, Vanoin A 20 261 H.H.LEAssBUMO vice t>ms.immar Getober 1, 1982 Na:ca. sam Oramaraons Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 569 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation N0/JHL:acm Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket Nos. 50-338 Operating Reactor Branch No. 3 50-339 Division of Licensing License Nos. NPF-4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NPF-7 Washington, D. C. 20555 Centlemen:

AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSES NPF-4 AND NPF-7 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests an amendment, in the form of changes to the Technical Specifications, to Operating Licenses NPF-4 and NPF-7 for North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. I and 2. The proposed changes are enclosed.

This proposed change is to revise Table 6.2-1 of Technical Specification 6.2.2 to comply with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's requirements on Nuclear Power Plant Staff Working Hours (Generic Letter No. 82-02) and also as per Nuclear Regulatory Commission letters dated February 8, 1982 and June 15, 1982 (Generic Letter No. 82-12). This proposed change is administrative in nature and does not pose any danger to the safe operation of the plant and/or public health. The proposed changes are provided in Attachment 1.

This request has been reviewed and approved by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committee and the Safety Evaluation and Control Staff. It has been determined that this request does not involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50.59.

We have evaluated this request in accordance with the criteria in 10 CFR 170.22. Since this request is administrative in nature, a Class II license amendment fee is required for Unit 1, and Class I license amendment fee is required for Unit 2. Accordingly, a voucher check in the amount of $1600 is enclosed in payment of the required fees.

Very truly yours, i

Lool ul &

[ UR. Y. E H. Leasburg Attachments

1. Proposed Technical Specification Changes

/[00 00

2. Voucher Check for $1600 cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator Region II i 8210120215 821001 i PDR P

ADOCK 05000308 ppg