ML20063J923
| ML20063J923 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 02/14/1994 |
| From: | Dennis Morey SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9402240385 | |
| Download: ML20063J923 (4) | |
Text
Southern Nuc car Operat:ng Company
- Post Otf4ce flos 1295
)
Ehrmngham Atacama 3520t Te!* phone (2DM Bf.8 5131 m
' outhern Nudear Operating Company 0,,,,u,,,
ll$f,77l;'
- w. we n+wm wsm February 14, 1994 10 CFR 26.71 Docket Nos.
50-348 50-364 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant Fitness For Duty Performance Data Gentlemen:
Southern Nuclear Operating Company hereby submits Fitness for Duty Performance Data for the six month reporting period, July 1993 through December 1993, as required by 10 CFR 26.71(d).
The data is summarized on the attached enclosures.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, j'!} hi v. /
Dave Morey '
DNM/JMG Enclosures cc: Southet0 Nuclea_r_Operatina Company Mr. R. D. Hill, General Manager - Plant Farley V. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washinqton. DC Mr. T. A. Reed, Licensing Project Manager - Farley V. S. Nucleat Reculatory Commig ion. Reaion 11 Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr. G. F. Maxwell, Senior Resident Inspector - Farley
} O i 3.U.3 (ORI 9402240385 940214
{DR ADOCK 05000348 g l PDR
4 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Corporate Headquarters Fitness for Duty Program The data generated under the Fitness for Duty (FFD) program from July 1993 I
through December 1993 has been reviewed and analyzed.
The data reflected in this report is that of employees of the J. M. Farley Nuclear Plant and employees of Southern Nuclear Operating Company Corporate Headquarters.
The random pool contains not only those badged for unescorted access, but -
also those employees who may, in an emergency condition, be called upon to work at the site and may require unescorted access.
Contractors without approved programs are included in the pool while on site.
Testing during this time period was performed on a nominal weekly basis to include swing shifts, weekends and holidays at a rate which was equal to 100% yearly of the total population.
In summarizing management actions associated with the FFD program, it should be emphasized that the incidences of confirming positive tests have i
been low.
Consequently, management actions relative to determination of ffD have been limited. Contractor employees screened as positive are denied access and no further action is taken.
There were no management actions taken on licensee employees during this six month period.
There was one occurrence where a performance test specimen (certified to the supplier to be positive and screened on site to be positive for marijuana [1HC]) was reported as negative by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services certified laboratory used by Southern Nuclear. An investigation was conducted regarding this occurrence.
It was determined a readjustment of the reagent and sensor probes on the Olympus analyzer was required for correction. A report of the unsatisfactory performance testing was submitted to the NRC on August 30, 1993.
There was an identified need for a computer software modification on December 1,1993 when a check of the FFD database pool was conducted which compared the three main file pools against the active badge pools at each of the sites where Southern Nuclear manages the FFD programs. This check was confirmed on the program run date of December 2,1993 when a total of 25 individuals at plant farley and 24 individuals at plant Vogtle that should have been in the random selection pool were absent from the pool.
After further investigation it was decided that, as a conservative measure, 18 of the 25 individuals at plant farley and 17 of the 24 individuals at plant Vogtle should have an immediate FFD test conducted. These individuals, although out of the random selection pool for a period of over 60 days, were under a continuous behavioral observation program. These immediate FFD tests were conducted and all were negative.
Southern Nuclear corporate information resources department identified the causative factor in the database pool program and an immediate correction was made.
In addition to the FFD testing of the previously mentioned individuals, issuing a quarterly quality control check of the entire random selection process and a plan for consolidation of the pools in a revised program by August 1, 1994 was determined to be appropriate actions.
Notification of this computer software issue was verbally communicated to the NRC on December 9, 1993.
r-Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 Southern Nuclear Operating Company 12-31-93 comon v s wre Eno.no Plant J. M.
Farley and Corporate Headquarters - Birmingham, AL Ltocany Francis Jessup (205) 868-5168 C v:ar Na+4 Pfiore (mcuoe area coce)
Cutetts: ScreervConfirmation (ng'mt)
II Appenda A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana
/
Amphetamines
/
/
Cocaine
/
Phencychdine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% B AC)
/
Lorg-Term Short-Term Testing Results Lcensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number we Unescorted Access 1418 31 354 Categories Tested Posrtive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre 4ccess 72 0
10 0
1082 4
k Post accident 3
0 0
0 0
0 P
g Observed behavior 1
0 0
0 3
0 Random 783 0
13 0
155 1
Fotbw-up 16 0
0 0
10 0
h1W Other Retest 39 0
4 0
0 0
can s e n f f Total 912 0
27 0
1250 5
REV.1/92
4 s
Bre kdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances Amphe-Phency Refusat Mari}uana Cocaine Opiates tamenes cidne Alcohol to Test 1
2 3
4 5
Licensee Employees 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Lor.g-Term Contractors 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Short-Term Contractors 3
2 0
0 0
0 0
A Total 3
2 0
0 0
0 0
5 m
-m
.a-
+---L.
a-mu m
N
'