ML20062M097
| ML20062M097 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1981 |
| From: | Carey J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Keimig R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062M086 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8112170068 | |
| Download: ML20062M097 (4) | |
Text
-
ve.
7f A
a164ss sooo E.UnY November.25, 1981 15219 Unites States' Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Attn:
R. R. Keimig, Chief Projects Branch No. 2 Division of Resident and Project' Inspection 631 Park Avenue
~
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Reference:
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 IE Inspection Report 81-18, Amended Response Appendix A,-Violation D Centlemen:
In response to your letter of November 9, 1981, we are hereby submitting this amended response to Appendix A, Violation D of the subject Inspection Report.
4 You _ stated that.our original response, dated October 15, 1981, to this Violation did not fully address actions taken to correct specifically identified documentation deficiencies including correction of Onsite Safety Committee minutes and elimination of the existing backlog of unissued meeting minutes. The additional actions included in this amended response address these concerns.
If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact my office.
Very truly yours, f
A ns
. J. Carey~I' '
ice President, Nuclear
Attachment:
Amended Reply to Notice of Violation, Appendix A, Violation D cc:
Mr. D. A. Beckman, Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear' Regulatory Commission Beaver Valley Power Station l
Shippingport, PA 15077 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, DC 20555 4
8112170068 811264 PDR ADOCK 05000334 G
_PDR
)
e
.,ja; V
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA)) ss:
COUNTY OF BEAVER
)
n this M#
day of -9 6 2u - / W
/ 9 p/
, before me, N /
U<- & #rti-u, a Notary Public in and for said Commonwealth and County, personally appeared J. D. Sieber, who _being duly sworn, deposed, and said that (1) he is Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing, of Duquesne Light, (2) he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing Submittal on behalf of said Company, and (3) the statements set forth in the Submittal are true and correct to the best of hi.s knowledge, information and belief.
W < W M M & ses HEIDI MARTIN, NOTATf P' SUC J
CHIPPEWA TOYnEP. EEAVER COUNTY MY CCMMIS20N E/PIRES mME 10.1H5 -
Nemt,er, Pennsylvama Associcon of Net 4r:es 1
-)
?-
c:glt",
o DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY Beaver Valley Power Station.
Agended Reply to' Notice of Violation Appendix A. Violation D Inspection No. 81-18
' Letter dated September. 14,.1981-VIOLATION D (Severity' Level VI; Supplement I)
Description of Violation (81-18-08)
Technical Specification 6.5.1.8 states "The OSC shall maintain written minutes of each meeting and copies shall be provided to the General Superintendent of -
Power Stations and Chairman of the Of fsite Review Committee."
- Beaver Valley Power Station Administrative Procedure, Chapter 10, Onsite Safety Committee (OSC), Revision 1, September 26, 1980; Step VI.A.2 states, " Minutes shall be recorded for all meetings, and all significant Committee actions shall be documented; minutes should be distributed to Committee members for review within one month of the -meeting."
Contrary to the above, the following Committee actions were not docum6nted in OSC meeting minutes. generated during 1980:
Fourteen instances-in which the quorum requirements at meetings were not clearly documented.
l l
One instance in which a procedure review was not documented.
Review of sixteen out of 200 temporary procedure changes were not documented.
I Investigations of violations identified in three ' inspections were not documented.
Many instances in which meeting minutes were not distributed for review within one month.
Corrective Action Taken Item No. 1:
The Onsite Safety Committee (OSC) will review those meeting minutes where the established quorum was considered to be inadequately documented.
Item No. 2 The specifically identified instances of inadequate documentation and 3:
of OSC review will be addressed in a future OSC meeting to provide documentation to support the review of these items.
In addition, a check of OSC reviews for the current issue of Operating Manual Chapters will be conducted to assure the OSC review has been properly documented, j
- =-
-r; A'
Ber,vsr Vall;y Pow;r Stnti n,LUnit No. 1 EAmended Reply to N tice of' Violation o
Appendix A, Violation D =
Inspection No. 81-18~
. Page 2 f Violation D (Continued)
~ Description of Violation Item No. 4:
As stated in this inspection-report, all inspection reports were-documented in the OSC meeting minutes.
It is agreed that the tmethod of documenting committee actions may not be consistent,-
however, each inspection report was reviewed and the. statement"
...for information only" documents that the inspection report was presented to the OSC.
The meeting minutes do state that all items on the agenda were reviewed.
Item No.'5:
Additional personnel have been assigned to reduce the backlog of unissued OSC meeting ' minutes.
Action Taken To Prevent Recurrence Item No.1:
Alternates attending the OSC meeting-are more clearly documented to assure quorum requirements are met at the beginning of the meeting. It should be noted that this violation concerned Onsite Safety Committee (OSC) meetings conducted in 1980.
Technical Specification (TS) Amendment No. 39, issued on February 11, 1981, reconstituted the OSC membership.
Since this change, the quorum of the OSC has been properly established and documented for OSC meetings.
Item No. 2 The members of the OSC have been instructed to provide the OSC
.and 3:
Recording Secretary with information on materials presented for OSC review so that the meeting minutes will properly document these activities.
Item No. 4:
To - avoid confusion in the future, the OSC Recording Secretary will be required to be more specific in documenting the reviews conducted by the OSC.
Item No. 5:
Hand written meeting minutes will be distributed to meeting ettendees to insure a timely review within the one month time frame specified in the Beaver Valley Power Station Administrative Procedures.
Date On Which Full Compliance Will Be Achieved
. i, Full compliance for' Item's Nos. 1, 2, and 3 will be achieved by December 15, 1981.
I't m No. 4 has been achieved at this time.
~
Full compliance i For full compliance for Item No. 5 the reduction of the backlog of unissued _0SC
. minutes -will be accomplished by April 2,1982.
A