ML20062L771
| ML20062L771 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1981 |
| From: | Daltroff S PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103110640 | |
| Download: ML20062L771 (3) | |
Text
,
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2301 M ARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 1881 -1981 PHILADELPHIA. PA.19101 sHistos t 04Linorr vrCs passicant ELECTaeC PRODUCTION
arch 6,
1M1 Docket l'o s. Sn_277 50-???
"r.
Thomas M.
?!ov a k, Assistant Director Division of Licensing U.S.
'!u c l e a r Re3ulatory Commission Vashington, DC 20555
Dear t'r. ?!ov ak :
This letter is in response to your letter of February 25, 1 M 1, which forwarded preliminary results of the '!RC's staf f review of information provided by Philadelphia Electric Company concerning the environmental qualification of safety related electriccl equipment at Peach Eottom Atomic Power Stntion (PDA P").
Your letter required, in part, that wa provida a written s t a t em a n t supporting tha safe operation of our facility, that takas into account the "RC staff's preliminary list of potential deficiencies.
The purpose of this statement is to provide the
'!RC with needed assurance ratarding the continued safety o f our facility until we can provide an item by item responsa to the preliminary review results.
I I
In response to your letter, we have reviewed tha l
e nv iro nm e n t al qualification doc uments for the Class l
1E electrical equipment, the Deco. rasponse, dated l
Cetober 31, 1990, to IE Pulletin 79-01n and the preliminary list of potential deficiencies resulting from the current 'IRC partial review.
Based upon this review conducted since receipt of your letter on February 26, 1981, we feel that the MD THlS DOCUMENT CONTAINS \\
L
\\
POOR QUALITY PAGES w
l IG10311 Q(o YD f
1
9 f
Mr. Thom as M.
Movak Page 2 conclusions reached in Appendix A to our October 31, 1930, letter remain v alid.
Therefore, the continued operation of PSAPS does not constitute an l
undue risk to public health and safety due to the failure, for environmental causes, of safety related electrical equipment wh ich wo ul d be required to mitiF,ata the consequences of a postulated accident.
If you have any further questions or require additional i n fo rm ation, please do not hesitate to contact us.
'le r y t r ul y yo ur s,
/
/
/
- ~...,
t e
o t
C0"'In!:" g A L 79: 97 p g;;, ev ty3.;7 4 ss.
C o t? 't T Y OF
'"I I L.\\ n E L n'I I A 1
S.
'. naltrof',
'3 e f r. 2 firqt
.I t t ly s'io r n,.!cnoses ai!
says:
1 That he is l' ice ' resident of Philadelnhia Elect ric Connany; th1t he has read the foregoinq resnonse to
"'C letter l
concerni'11 t '1 e environnenta! <' 't a l i f i c a t i o '1 of safoty r e l a t e.'
o l e c t r i e r.1 e r: u i n n e n t 1nd ' nou s the contents thoreof-a n.! that tha statenents and natters net forth therein are true and.orrect to the b e <: t of his k n o'r le d ae, in e nrnation and heliac.
1 l
)
l Sir b s c r l bo 1 and s u c r ei to before ne this day of j
OA
\\
R
\\
.f),#
'o [1 :,,,,"...;,
ilblic D
Notary Puo. L Ph'3. F"
My Comm;s.i bpitM M Z.,,,,
_.