ML20062K092

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Incorporation of Ultraflow Spacer on 9x9-IX/9X BWR Fuel Design
ML20062K092
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/28/1993
From: Thadani A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Copeland R
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
Shared Package
ML20062K078 List:
References
NUDOCS 9312140418
Download: ML20062K092 (1)


Text

e s*OUh i$@dS I

UNITED STATES yi NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y64/

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 28, 1993 Mr. R. A. Copeland, Manager Product Licensing Siemens Power Corporation 2101 Horn Rapids Corporation P. O. Box 130 Richland, Wa. 99352-0130

Dear Mr. Copeland:

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING 0F ULTRAFLOW" SPACER ON 9x9-IX/X BWR FUEL DESIGN The staff hu reviewed the request submitted by Siemens Power Corporation (SPC) by a letter dated February 26, 1993. This request provides the description and bases for incorporating the SPC ULTRAFLOW

  • spacer into the 9x9-IX/9X BWR fuel design which was approved by the staff.

The staff finds the subject request to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the NRC's associated technical evaluation.

The evaluation defines the basis for accepting the request.

The staff will not repeat its review of matters described in the SPC request and will find acceptable, when referenced in license applications, except to ensure that the material presented applies to the plant involved.

Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the SPC request.

In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, the staff requests that SPC publish accepted versions of this submittal, proprietary and non-proprietary, within 3 months of receiving this letter. The versions will incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation between the title page and the abstract.

The accepted versions shall include an "A" (designating accepted) after the report identification symbol.

If our criteria or regulations change, such that our conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, SPC and or the applicants referencing the topical report should revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without a revision of their respective documentation.

Sincerely /

y

)X r

e

~

Ashok C Thadani, Director Division of Systems Safety and Analysis Office 'of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Request for incorporation of ULTRAFLOW" on 9x9-IX/9X BWR fuel design 312140428 931007 TOPRP EtfVEXXN C

PDR