ML20062H669

Informs of Info Re ACRS Subcommittee on Reactor Operations Consideration of Issues Concerning Plant TS Replacement

ML20062H669
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	11/28/1990
From:	Johari Moore NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:	Bollwerk G, Moore T, Wilber H NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
CON-#490-11114 OLA-5, NUDOCS 9012050223
Download: ML20062H669 (2)

Text

_ _._ ._ _ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _.. .

_ _ _- - - - --- - - - - - ~ ~ -- ---

q yAiog  !

.

• Io, UNITED $TATES

['

5 (l'

,c-I NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASH 6NGTON, D. C. 20$55  ; A rii1.L'

} t '/

umc 90 my 29 P5 32 November 28,1990 ie a ma u r.N W

,syacm tt uvid bitANCH f Thomas S. Moore, Chairman Howard A. Wilber '

Atomic Safety and Ucensing Appeal Atomic Safety and Ucensing Appeal

, Board Board .

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 -!

G. Paul Bollwerk, III; Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board -

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,

Washington, D.C. 20555 r

In the Matter of FLORIDA POWER & UGHT COMPANY '

(Turkey Point Plant, Units Nos. 3 and 4)

Technical Specifications Replacement' Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA 5. 50 251-OLA 5

Dear Administrative Judges:

1 The purpose of this letter is to inform the Appeal Board of recent information-received by Staff Counsel concerning consideration by the ACRS Subcommittee'on Reactor Operations of certain issues referred to the ACRS by the Ucensing Board in the i l above-captioned proceeding. By letter. of November 1,1990, I informed the Appeal:

Board that, contrary to the Staffs . initial understanding, the Subcommittee on Reactor. ' '

p Operations had decided to consider those issues. Therefore, Staff Counsel believed that - .

some clarification of a statement made in its brief filed in this proceeding before the Appeal Board on October 22,11990,' was necessary.

On November 14,1990,.I was informed (by telsphone) by Mr. Raymond Fraley,;

-Executive Director of the ACRS, that during a recent ACRS meeting, the Subcommittee l

on Reactor Operations had decided not to consider the issues after all. Therefore, I am.

writing to apprise the Appeal Board that, as of this time, it is the Staffs understanding: .

7 4  !

e

,,4 . = ,

2 - - - . s

) .

3 that neither the ACRS nor any subcommittee of the ACR$ intends to consider the issues referred to the ACRS by the Ucensing Board in this proceeding in its order of  !

September 5,1990.

Sincerely, d ME Oh Janice E. Moore

• i Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Advanced Reactors and Special J Pioceedings l l

. cc: Service Ust ,

l T

I L

p s

a 1

__ . . - . , .