ML20062H669
| ML20062H669 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/28/1990 |
| From: | Johari Moore NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Bollwerk G, Moore T, Wilber H NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| CON-#490-11114 OLA-5, NUDOCS 9012050223 | |
| Download: ML20062H669 (2) | |
Text
_ _._._ _ _ __ _ _ _. _ _...
- ~ ~ -- ---
q yAiog Io, UNITED $TATES
- ['
(l'
,c-NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
I WASH 6NGTON, D. C. 20$55
- A rii1.L' t
'/
umc
}
90 my 29 P5 32 November 28,1990
,syacm ma r.N W ie a u tt uvid bitANCH f
Thomas S. Moore, Chairman Howard A. Wilber Atomic Safety and Ucensing Appeal Atomic Safety and Ucensing Appeal Board Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Washington, D.C. 20555 G. Paul Bollwerk, III; Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 r
In the Matter of FLORIDA POWER & UGHT COMPANY (Turkey Point Plant, Units Nos. 3 and 4)
Technical Specifications Replacement' Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA 5. 50 251-OLA 5
Dear Administrative Judges:
The purpose of this letter is to inform the Appeal Board of recent information-1 received by Staff Counsel concerning consideration by the ACRS Subcommittee'on Reactor Operations of certain issues referred to the ACRS by the Ucensing Board in the i
l above-captioned proceeding.
By letter. of November 1,1990, I informed the Appeal:
Board that, contrary to the Staffs. initial understanding, the Subcommittee on Reactor. '
p Operations had decided to consider those issues. Therefore, Staff Counsel believed that -
some clarification of a statement made in its brief filed in this proceeding before the Appeal Board on October 22,11990,' was necessary.
- On November 14,1990,.I was informed (by telsphone) by Mr. Raymond Fraley,;
l
-Executive Director of the ACRS, that during a recent ACRS meeting, the Subcommittee on Reactor Operations had decided not to consider the issues after all. Therefore, I am.
writing to apprise the Appeal Board that, as of this time, it is the Staffs understanding:
7 4
e
,,4
=
2 s
)
that neither the ACRS nor any subcommittee of the ACR$ intends to consider the issues 3
referred to the ACRS by the Ucensing Board in this proceeding in its order of September 5,1990.
Sincerely, d ME Oh Janice E. Moore i
Deputy Assistant General Counsel for Advanced Reactors and Special J
Pioceedings l
cc: Service Ust l
T I
L p
s a
1
.