ML20062H553

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Board Should Wait for Commission Decision on Reconsideration,Per ASLB Requesting Views on Whether Board Should Not Proceed W/Deciding on Petitions at Present Time.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20062H553
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 11/19/1990
From: Mcgranery J
DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON, SCIENTISTS & ENGINEERS FOR SECURE ENERGY, SHOREHAM-WADING RIVER CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NY
To: Ferguson G, Kline J, Margulies M
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#490-11085 CLI-90-08, OLA, NUDOCS 9012050092
Download: ML20062H553 (4)


Text

---. - _ _ _.. - -. - _.. _... - _ _.

M,, O r5 1

DOW; LOHNES & ALBERTSON l

y ATToRNCYS AT LAW C

1RSS TWENTY-THIRD STREET WASHINGTON, D. C. 20037 90 WJV 21 P6 :06 E

E h e 7 8000 I

tettpMcNE (708) es'.asco 3p taw w d'"*"'*"'"*"'"'

November 19,.1990 o=c, m VIA TELECOPY Morton B. Margulies, Chairman g

Dr. Jerry R. Kline i

Dr. George A. Ferguson Atomic Safety and Licensing-Board' U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555-Re:

ASLB Letter of November.8,:1990'In The: Matter of Long. Island Lighting company (Shoreham Nuclear-Power Station.-Unit-1) Docket No.'

50-332-OIA

& -32.2-Old Gentlemen:

1 l

By the above-referenced letter, you;have: Askedcusrand-other participants in the above-captioned proceeding to-provide our " views on whether there'.-is reason for-the' Licensing Board not 1

l to proceed with deciding the petitionsfat this time, taking into 4

consideration Petitioners' un:esolved request'for reconsideration.

of CLI-90-08."

ASLB November 8 Letter'at 2-As' suggested by your letter, Petitioners Shoreham-

~

Wading River Central School District-(" School" District")'and Scientists and Engineers for Secure; Energy,RInc. ("SE ") have, E by; a

counsel,. conferred with the NRC' Staff on this> issue;and have i

considered the November:16,.1990' letterifrom the licensee's

attorney.

(In this..latter respect', the. School; District: and SE 1

notethatLILCOLoffaredLonly<aconblusion,awithoutanyrationah-l I

that'"the' Board need not'and should'not: wait for the Commission's

! disposition of'. Petitioners October 129f(JointiPetition) for l

.(R)econsideration,-lbut~should proceed to:ruleLon'each;of-Petitioners';pending requestst for' hearing ~in(a' manner consistent-

{

l twith CLI-90-08". 'LILCO's November-16,(1990)ReponseEat 1).-

7j F

W l

Given the possible(significance.of0the commission's-reconsideration l of CLI-90-08'. to.- the adope: of : these: proceedings

and_the facttthat-ths-first orderiof businessiin'any? proceeding, a

.should'be~the/ scoping of!the; environmental impact statement.

4

-("EIS"):or= supplemental EIS,4 going' forward with thefproceedingtat~ '

this time'before'the-Commiss' ion'scforthcoming,decisi,onLcould~ '

]

f i

'9012050092 901119 W

.i POR -ADOCK 05000322 f

,05h:-

0 i

PDR J g

c 1

i.

I c

a Atomic Safety and Licensing' Board November 19, 1990 Page 2 entail and, Petitioners argue,.would entail-a, considerable waste.

of-administrative resources on-the pa*t of'the Board,.the'NRC Staff, the Petitioners and other partics to'this proceeding.

The School District and SEg suggest tha.t there is a' considerable. likelihood that the Commission-will. reverse ~the position originally taken in CLI-90-08 because the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of Energy have-bothi submitted comments urging such a, reversal;which comments the Commission has already determined-that itLwill consider.#as-appropriate in reviewing the Joint Petition."

In the matter of.

Long Island Lighting company.(shoreham' Nuclear Power Station, Unit'1),' Docket No.. 50-322,0rder of November-15,-1990.at 21 n.1.

Given tho' fact;that;the Supreme Court hastrepeatedlyL:

ruled.that CEQ's views on the scope and other= requirements.of.an EIS are entitled to " substantial deference", it'would appear highly-likely that the Commission will. follow the specific ~' advice offered by CEQ in these circumstances'on the appropriate scope of NEPA review.

Fu&., Robertson v. Methow Vallev Citizens Council, U.S..

', 109 S.Ct.' 1835,.1849;(1989).

Further,'given;theipendency o'f'the!JointTPetitioni CLI-90-08 is not final and, thus,-the Board sayinct rely on it (or-

" proceed in a manner consistent' with" :it as urged by' LILCO) L The School District and SE2:aleoinote that.the-Commission'sLorder-of November 15, 1990' indicates: filings by all interested parties on these, issues will be completed by. November 26,.1990.

In these circumstances,iwe believe thattit'would also1 be prudent to wait'for the' Commission's decision:on-reconsideration.

. Respectfully submitte%

James P.'McGranary,LJr.:

Counsel lfor the; Petitioners; Shoreham-Wading River Central School District and4 Scientists"and Enginee p for: Secure. Energy,--Inc.

JPM: jab

^

cc:

Service List ~

I

l 4

M r.LitD UshF.C UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION % NOV 21 P6 :06 In the Matter of

)

$[cN d!r[ N M [

):

Docket No. 50 322 Ol%NCH LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)

ASLBP No. 91-621-01 OLA

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the letter Response by Shoreham Wading River Central '

I School District and Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energy,Inc. to the Board's '

November 8 letter were served upon the following by telecopy when indicated by an asterisk, by Federal Express when indicated by two asterisks, or otherwise by first-class '

mail, postage prepaid on this 19th day of November,1990: _

Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board

  • Administrative Judge
  • U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissionc Morton B. Margulies, Chairman '

Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1U.S. Nuclear: Regulatory Commission:

Administrative Judge'

. Washington, D.C. 20555 '

Jerry R. Kline

- Atomic Safety and Ucensing Board -

- Administrative Judge" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ;

. George A. Ferguson Washington, D.C. 20555

'ASLBP '

t

- 5307 Al Jones Drive 4

The Honorable Samuel J. Chilk Columbia Beach, Maryland 20764 i

The Secretary of the Commission.

Office of the Secretary; Michael R. Deland, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Council;on Environmental Quality J

i Washington, D.C. 20555

. Executive Office of the President,

l Washington, D.C. 20500 -

Edwin J. Reis, Esq.*

Deputy Assistant General Counsel

' Carl Ri Schenker, Jr.; Esq.<

a for Reactor Ucensing Counsel,' Long Island Power Authority; 1Mitzi A? Young, Esq.

O'Melveny & Myers 1.

Senior Supervisory Trial Attorney 55513th Street, N.W.i" Office of the General Counsel Washington, D.C. 20004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

^

q (Washington, D.C. 20555

+

i i

f I

g f

t-1

f

. l r

2-Stephen A. Wakefield, Esq.

Donald P. Irwin, Esq.*

General Counsel Hunton & Williams U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 1535 ^

Washington, D.C. 20585

Richmond, Virginia 23212 --

Charles M. Pratt, Esq. _

Samuel A. Cherniak, Esq.-

Senior Vice President and NYS Department of I.aw :

General Counsel

. Bureau of Consumer.

22nd Floor.

Frauds and Protection '

l, Power Authority of State of New York 120 Broadway.

1633 Broadway New York, New York = 10271 l

New York, New York 10019 3

i November 19,1990 o

Ja s P. McGra6ery, Jr.

- //[

nsel for Petitioner Intervefiors '

Shoreham Wading River Central School '

District and Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energy, Inc..

i 1

j o

b k

k t

i 2.

f i

'b'--

.._4,

.....