ML20062G958

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2-12-20 Order Granting Motion to Intervene (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1019)
ML20062G958
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/12/2020
From: Andrew Averbach
NRC/OGC
To:
References
1828325, 20-1019, NRC-50-293-LT, NRC-72-1044-LT
Download: ML20062G958 (1)


Text

USCA Case #20-1019 Document #1828325 Filed: 02/12/2020 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 20-1019 September Term, 2019 NRC-50-293-LT NRC-72-1044-LT Filed On: February 12, 2020 [1828325]

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Petitioner v.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., et al.,

Intervenors ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Holtec International, Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, Holtec Pilgrim, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted.

Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(e)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order. Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.

Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C.

Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 39 (2019), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 39.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/

Laura M. Chipley Deputy Clerk