ML20062G823

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Info Re Status of Prompt Notification Sys,In Response to 820730 Request.Deficiencies Found After Sys Activation on 820430 Corrected.Addl Testing Verified Sys Operability
ML20062G823
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 08/10/1982
From: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To: Deyoung R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
NUDOCS 8208130183
Download: ML20062G823 (2)


Text

(

,O

\\

gsuun SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O 6201 S street, Box 15830, Sacramento, Califomia 95813; (916) 452-3211 August 10, 1982 RICHARD C DEYOUNG DIRECTOR OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555 DOCKET 50-312 RANCHO SEC0 NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT N0 1 PROMPT NOTIFICATION SYSTEM

REFERENCES:

10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.D.3 District letter of June 30, 1981 District letter of July 24, 1981 Federal Register Vol. 46, No.182 p46587 NRC Region V letter of October 20, 1981 District letter of December 31, 1981 NRC Region V letter of January 21, 1982 Notice of Violation, February 12, 1982 District letter of February 12, 1982 District letter of March 3,1982 District letter of March 18, 1982 District letter of April 1,1982 District letter of April 19, 1982 District letter of April 27, 1982 District letter of May 5,1982 NRC Region V letter of June 23, 1982 NRC letter of July 30, 1982 This status report is in response to your letter of July 30, 1982.

Between June 16 and July 12, our siren manufacturer installed nadified decoders at each of the siren locations. To give us confidence that the modifications were effectiva, we decided to disconnect the siren; energize its controls, including receiver and decoder; and monitor their activity over a two-week period.

During that two-week period, we found no indications that the sirens would activate

falsely, 8208130183 e20elo PDR ADOCK 05000312 F

PDR AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING MORE IHAN 600.000 IN THE HEARf 0F CAllF0RNiA

t o.

RICHARD C DEYOUNG August 10, 1982 Following the installation of the modified decoders, we performed integrated tests on the sirens. The tests included activating a' siren through the siren.

encoder and communication equipment at each of the respective counties. All the sirens successfully ' activated. These tests were done jointly with County personnel operating the activation equipment at their E0C's. and District personnel at the siren location.

On July 26, 1982, we returned to service the siren alerting systems for Amador and Sacramento Counties. On July 28, 1982, San Joaquin County's siren system was returned to service.

Since then,.we have experienced a. false operation on one siren in Sacramento County.

Repairs are being made to that unit, and we plan on placing it back into service within the next two weeks.

On August 9,1982, full power, sustained sound output tests were done on sirens which either did not receive them during our earlier testing or had not operated

~

properly during that earlier testing. These tests also~ proved successful.

In summary, the deficiencies found after system activation on April 30, 1982,

,have been corrected and the Prompt Notification System for Rancho Seco has been returned to service.

Furthermore, additional testing has been done which further verifies the operability of the system.

' John J. Mattimoe Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer

~

cc:

R. H. Engelken, Director Region V, Office of Inspection and Enforcement t

b 4

w